Jim Marriott
Deputy Director, Aviation Security and Facilitation
OECD High Level Risk Forum
Washington D.C.
9 December 2015
International Civil Aviation
Security
Standardization of International Civil Aviation
THEREFORE, the undersigned
governments having agreed on certain
principles and arrangements in order that
international civil aviation may be
developed in a safe and orderly manner
and that international air transport
services may be established on the basis of
equality of opportunity and operated
soundly and economically;
Have accordingly concluded this
Convention to that end.
ICAO global leadership
• 191 Member States
• Over 10,000 Standards and
Recommended Practices
• Regular, systematic audits
• No Country Left Behind
ICAO Strategic Objectives
• Safety
• Air navigation capacity and efficiency
• Security and facilitation
• Economic development of air transport
• Environmental protection
Economic benefits of aviation worldwide
Air transport is a vital economic engine and catalyst for economic development
58.1million jobs* $2.4 trillion
Global economic
impact*
* Including direct, indirect, induced and catalytic
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000 1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
RevenuePassenger-Kilometres
(billion)
Aviation security challenges
• Constantly evolving risks
• Scale and growth of aviation
• High public profile
• Consequences of failure
• Many risk management actors
Key critricisms
• Always reactive, never predictive
• Lack of consistency
• Solutions are costly, not sustainable
Continuous assessment
3.1.3 Each Contracting State shall keep under
constant review the level of threat to civil aviation
within its territory, and establish and implement
policies and procedures to adjust relevant
elements of its national civil aviation security
programme accordingly, based upon a security risk
assessment carried out by the relevant national
authorities.
Information sharing
2.4.3 Each Contracting State shall establish and
implement procedures to share with other
Contracting States threat information that applies
to the aviation security interests of those States, to
the extent practicable.
Global Risk Context Statement
• Best practice methods for assessing
risk
• Scenario based, outcomes focused
• Past + present + future risks
Conflict Zone Risk Repository
• Response to MH17
• Single platform for States’ conflict
zone risk information
• Publicly accessible on ICAO
website
Information posted by States
Affected States can post a response
Reporting State: United Kingdom
Information Source Type: NOTAM
State Affected: Egypt
Information Source Reference: 14/12/0274 AS6
Information Title:
Potential risk from anti-aviation
weaponry
Content:
Q)
EGXX/QROXX/IV/NBO/W/000/999/5218
N01451W999 B) FROM: 15/11/18 16:00C)
TO: 16/02/16 23:59 EST E) HAZARDOUS
SITUATION IN EGYPT. POTENTIAL RISK TO
AVIATION OVERFLYING AIRSPACE IN
NORTH SINAI GOVERNORATE WITHIN
THE AREA BOUNDED BY 311400N
322200E - 294000N 324000E - 293000N
345400E - 312000N 341200E - 311400N
322200E (CAIRO FIR, SINAI PENINSULA)
AT LESS THAN 25000FT AGL FROM
DEDICATED ANTI-AIRCRAFT WEAPONRY.
OPERATORS ARE ADVISED TO AVOID
OPERATING AT LESS THAN 25000FT AGL
IN THIS AIRSPACE. CONTACT UK
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (+44)
(0)20 7944 3260 OR (+44) (0)207 944
5999 OUT OF HOURS. 14-12-0274/AS6.
LOWER: SFC UPPER: UNL
Area Affected:
311400N 322200E - 294000N 324000E -
293000N 345400E - 312000N 341200E -
311400N 322200E (CAIRO FIR, SINAI
PENINSULA)
Link to Information:
Valid From: 2015-11-15
Valid To: 2016-02-16
Status:
The State Affected has indicated an
objection.
Attachments:
2014120274NOT70SinaiFIRCairo text
NB.pdf
Post Affecting Egypt Reported by United Kingdom:
International Civil Aviation Security

International Civil Aviation Security

  • 1.
    Jim Marriott Deputy Director,Aviation Security and Facilitation OECD High Level Risk Forum Washington D.C. 9 December 2015 International Civil Aviation Security
  • 2.
    Standardization of InternationalCivil Aviation THEREFORE, the undersigned governments having agreed on certain principles and arrangements in order that international civil aviation may be developed in a safe and orderly manner and that international air transport services may be established on the basis of equality of opportunity and operated soundly and economically; Have accordingly concluded this Convention to that end.
  • 3.
    ICAO global leadership •191 Member States • Over 10,000 Standards and Recommended Practices • Regular, systematic audits • No Country Left Behind
  • 4.
    ICAO Strategic Objectives •Safety • Air navigation capacity and efficiency • Security and facilitation • Economic development of air transport • Environmental protection
  • 5.
    Economic benefits ofaviation worldwide Air transport is a vital economic engine and catalyst for economic development 58.1million jobs* $2.4 trillion Global economic impact* * Including direct, indirect, induced and catalytic
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Aviation security challenges •Constantly evolving risks • Scale and growth of aviation • High public profile • Consequences of failure • Many risk management actors
  • 8.
    Key critricisms • Alwaysreactive, never predictive • Lack of consistency • Solutions are costly, not sustainable
  • 10.
    Continuous assessment 3.1.3 EachContracting State shall keep under constant review the level of threat to civil aviation within its territory, and establish and implement policies and procedures to adjust relevant elements of its national civil aviation security programme accordingly, based upon a security risk assessment carried out by the relevant national authorities.
  • 11.
    Information sharing 2.4.3 EachContracting State shall establish and implement procedures to share with other Contracting States threat information that applies to the aviation security interests of those States, to the extent practicable.
  • 12.
    Global Risk ContextStatement • Best practice methods for assessing risk • Scenario based, outcomes focused • Past + present + future risks
  • 13.
    Conflict Zone RiskRepository • Response to MH17 • Single platform for States’ conflict zone risk information • Publicly accessible on ICAO website
  • 14.
    Information posted byStates Affected States can post a response
  • 15.
    Reporting State: UnitedKingdom Information Source Type: NOTAM State Affected: Egypt Information Source Reference: 14/12/0274 AS6 Information Title: Potential risk from anti-aviation weaponry Content: Q) EGXX/QROXX/IV/NBO/W/000/999/5218 N01451W999 B) FROM: 15/11/18 16:00C) TO: 16/02/16 23:59 EST E) HAZARDOUS SITUATION IN EGYPT. POTENTIAL RISK TO AVIATION OVERFLYING AIRSPACE IN NORTH SINAI GOVERNORATE WITHIN THE AREA BOUNDED BY 311400N 322200E - 294000N 324000E - 293000N 345400E - 312000N 341200E - 311400N 322200E (CAIRO FIR, SINAI PENINSULA) AT LESS THAN 25000FT AGL FROM DEDICATED ANTI-AIRCRAFT WEAPONRY. OPERATORS ARE ADVISED TO AVOID OPERATING AT LESS THAN 25000FT AGL IN THIS AIRSPACE. CONTACT UK DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (+44) (0)20 7944 3260 OR (+44) (0)207 944 5999 OUT OF HOURS. 14-12-0274/AS6. LOWER: SFC UPPER: UNL Area Affected: 311400N 322200E - 294000N 324000E - 293000N 345400E - 312000N 341200E - 311400N 322200E (CAIRO FIR, SINAI PENINSULA) Link to Information: Valid From: 2015-11-15 Valid To: 2016-02-16 Status: The State Affected has indicated an objection. Attachments: 2014120274NOT70SinaiFIRCairo text NB.pdf Post Affecting Egypt Reported by United Kingdom: