This document discusses the CRAFT (Computerized Relative Allocation of Facility Technique) model, which aims to improve factory layouts to reduce costs and increase efficiency. It will provide a CAD interface to allow users to quickly modify layouts and see the impact on productivity. Key steps include inputting data into the tool, using it to iteratively exchange departments to minimize transportation costs, and tracking progress towards the goal of improved material flow and shop productivity. Training will be provided to users on how to navigate and utilize the application.

1. CRAFT In Action
How do we use this?
Next Steps
C.R.A.F.T. Model
Explained
Computerized Relative Allocation of
Facility Technique improves the
arrangement of machines, material
handling devices, and flow path,
reducing cost and time.
Gives the team a
3
Different
Programs
2 1
Data
Sources
User
Interface
3P Event Impact
Using the layout interface (CAD)
the group will be able to quickly
move tables and immediately
see how this effects the overall
layout score allowing for
immediate decision making.
This tool will empower the
facilitator in dispute
management.
The CAD interface will be limited
and simplified to allow anyone to
easily make changes.
• Initial layout is very accurate
• Flexible department shapes
• Dummy departments
• Fixed departments
• Non rectangular buildings
31
Input data from SAP and the HPG website
can be changed on the fly as well so that
flow data is always up to date.
Digital records allows for easy goal
managing and progress evaluation.
Everyone’s ideas can be included and
the impact can be seen easily.
Keeping everyone on the same page,
project updates and progress can be
easily communicated.
The calculation part of this
application has been
developed and the CAD
interface is currently in
development. This will be a
unique to TE solution for the
facility layout problem.
For more detailed explanation of
the process find Mark on the floor
or email mark.miller@te.com.
This process is an inclusive way to lead to better
material flow and overall shop productivity.
Measure of Success
Starts with initial layout (current state)
and improves the layout by
interchanging the department pair
wise so that the transportation cost is
minimized.
Pros
Cons
• Can result in odd shapes
• Assumes move cost is
linearly related to length
• Path dependent
• Local Optimal
VS.
Core team will be thoroughly trained on
the application and its navigation.
WorkCenter centroids are calculated
and values are pulled from CAD.
Score Calculation Summary
Sales data is pulling into application
for top parts in each GPL.
Using the part batch size this is then
translated into a weekly flow value.
Weekly Flow
From-To Chart and Distance matrix
are calculated and filled.
Layout is evaluated using the cost
model:
New score is displayed, or next
exchange is made.
Important Points