image7.pngimage8.png.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include four major sections: the Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References (please see Purdue University's APA Style GuideLinks to an external site. for more information). Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page. For this assignment, please consider the following: How do you plan to use your eyes more intentionally in sending and receiving clear messages from your friends and family members? Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 30 pts Excellent The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. 24 pts Good The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. 13.5 pts Acceptable The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). 0 pts Unacceptable The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning 30 pts Excellent The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/cla.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
OFFICE OF INSTRUCTION HLC Academy – Writing Across the Curri.docx
OFFICE OF INSTRUCTION
HLC Academy – Writing Across the Curriculum at Mohave Rubric
The A paper The B paper The C paper The D paper The F paper
Ideas Excels in responding to assignment.
Interesting, demonstrates sophistication of
thought. Central idea/thesis is clearly
communicated, worth developing; limited
enough to be manageable. Paper
recognizes some complexity of its thesis:
may acknowledge its contradictions,
qualifications, or limits and follow out their
logical implications. Understands and
critically evaluates its sources,
appropriately limits and defines terms.
A solid paper, responding appropriately
to assignment. Clearly states a
thesis/central idea, but may have minor
lapses in development. Begins to
acknowledge the complexity of central
idea and the possibility of other points
of view. Shows careful reading of
sources, but may not evaluate them
critically. Attempts to define terms, not
always successful.
Adequate but weaker and less
effective, possibly responding less
well to assignment. Presents central
idea in general terms, often
depending on platitudes or clichés.
Usually does not acknowledge other
views. Shows basic comprehension
of sources, perhaps with lapses in
understanding. If it defines terms,
often depends on dictionary
definition.
Does not have a clear central idea
or does not respond appropriately
to the assignment. Thesis may be
too vague or obvious to be
developed effectively. Paper may
misunderstand sources.
Does not respond to the
assignment, lacks a thesis or central
idea, and may neglect to use
sources where necessary.
Organization &
coherence
Uses a logical structure appropriate to
paper’s subject, purpose, audience, thesis,
and disciplinary field. Sophisticated
transitional sentences often develop one
idea from the previous one or identify their
logical relations. It guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or
progression of ideas.
Shows a logical progression of ideas and
uses fairly sophisticated transitional
devices; e.g., may move from least to
more important idea. Some logical links
may be faulty, but each paragraph
clearly relates to paper’s central idea.
May list ideas or arrange them
randomly rather than using any
evident logical structure. May use
transitions, but they are likely to be
sequential (first, second, third) rather
than logic-based. While each
paragraph may relate to central idea,
logic is not always clear. Paragraphs
have topic sentences but may be
overly general, and arrangement of
sentences within paragraphs may
lack coherence.
May have random organization,
lacking internal paragraph
coherence and using few or
inappropriate transitions.
Paragraphs may lack topic
sentences or main ideas, or may be
too general or too specific to be
effective. Paragraphs may not all
relate to paper’s thesis.
No appreciable organization; lacks
transitions and coherence.
Support.
Crisis Reflection RubricThe following rubric will be used .docx
Crisis Reflection Rubric
The following rubric will be used to evaluate your writing sample. When preparing your document, please
follow the Five C’s of Effective Writing. Make your writing: Clear, Concise, Correct, Courteous, and
Comprehensive.
Excellent Good Acceptable Unacceptable Score
Content
(20 points
possible)
The essay illustrates
exemplary understanding
of the course material by
thoroughly and correctly:
(1) addressing the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct terminology;
(4) explaining the
reasoning behind key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
points with several
accurate and original
examples.
(20 points)
The essay illustrates
solid understanding of
the course material by
correctly: (1) addressing
most of the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining most of
the key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the reasoning
behind most of the key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
some points with
accurate examples.
(15 points)
The essay illustrates
rudimentary understanding
of the course material by:
(1) mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the key
concepts/ideas (though
failing to fully or accurately
explain many of them); (3)
using terminology, though
sometimes inaccurately or
inappropriately; and (4)
incorporating some key
claims/points, but failing to
explain the reasoning
behind them (or doing so
inaccurately).
(10 points)
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing the
relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology.
(5 points)
Reasoning
(20 points
possible)
The essay reflects expert
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material;
(2) making connections
between relevant
ideas/claims/points; (3)
presenting an insightful
and thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue or
problem; (4) identifying
and discussing important
nuances in the relevant
material; and (5)
identifying and discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(20 points)
The essay reflects fairly
strong reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material,
(2) making appropriate
connections between
some of the key
ideas/claims/points; (3)
accurately evaluating the
issue/problem; and (4)
identifying ad discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(15 points)
The essay reflects basic
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some of
the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2) making a
few connections between
ideas/claims/points, but
ignoring or inaccurately
connecting others; (3)
evaluating the
issue/problem at a ver.
EssayPaper Rubric The following rubric will be used to.docx
Essay/Paper Rubric
The following rubric will be used to evaluate your writing sample. When preparing your document, please
follow the Five C’s of Effective Writing. Make your writing: Clear, Concise, Correct, Courteous, and
Comprehensive.
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Score
Content
(40 points
possible)
The essay illustrates
exemplary understanding
of the course material by
thoroughly and correctly:
(1) addressing the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct terminology;
(4) explaining the
reasoning behind key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
points with several
accurate and original
examples.
(40 points)
The essay illustrates
solid understanding of
the course material by
correctly: (1) addressing
most of the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining most of
the key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the reasoning
behind most of the key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
some points with
accurate examples.
(35 points)
The essay illustrates
rudimentary understanding
of the course material by:
(1) mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the key
concepts/ideas (though
failing to fully or accurately
explain many of them); (3)
using terminology, though
sometimes inaccurately or
inappropriately; and (4)
incorporating some key
claims/points, but failing to
explain the reasoning
behind them (or doing so
inaccurately).
(30 points)
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing the
relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology.
(20 points)
Reasoning
(40 points
possible)
The essay reflects expert
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material;
(2) making connections
between relevant
ideas/claims/points; (3)
presenting an insightful
and thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue or
problem; (4) identifying
and discussing important
nuances in the relevant
material; and (5)
identifying and discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(40 points)
The essay reflects fairly
strong reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material,
(2) making appropriate
connections between
some of the key
ideas/claims/points; (3)
accurately evaluating the
issue/problem; and (4)
identifying ad discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(35 points)
The essay reflects basic
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some of
the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2) making a
few connections between
ideas/claims/points, but
ignoring or inaccurately
connecting others; (.
EssayPaper Rubric The following rubric will be used to.docx
Essay/Paper Rubric
The following rubric will be used to evaluate your writing sample. When preparing your document, please
follow the Five C’s of Effective Writing. Make your writing: Clear, Concise, Correct, Courteous, and
Comprehensive.
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Score
Content
(40 points
possible)
The essay illustrates
exemplary understanding
of the course material by
thoroughly and correctly:
(1) addressing the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct terminology;
(4) explaining the
reasoning behind key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
points with several
accurate and original
examples.
(40 points)
The essay illustrates
solid understanding of
the course material by
correctly: (1) addressing
most of the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining most of
the key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the reasoning
behind most of the key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
some points with
accurate examples.
(35 points)
The essay illustrates
rudimentary understanding
of the course material by:
(1) mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the key
concepts/ideas (though
failing to fully or accurately
explain many of them); (3)
using terminology, though
sometimes inaccurately or
inappropriately; and (4)
incorporating some key
claims/points, but failing to
explain the reasoning
behind them (or doing so
inaccurately).
(30 points)
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing the
relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology.
(20 points)
Reasoning
(40 points
possible)
The essay reflects expert
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material;
(2) making connections
between relevant
ideas/claims/points; (3)
presenting an insightful
and thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue or
problem; (4) identifying
and discussing important
nuances in the relevant
material; and (5)
identifying and discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(40 points)
The essay reflects fairly
strong reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material,
(2) making appropriate
connections between
some of the key
ideas/claims/points; (3)
accurately evaluating the
issue/problem; and (4)
identifying ad discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(35 points)
The essay reflects basic
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some of
the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2) making a
few connections between
ideas/claims/points, but
ignoring or inaccurately
connecting others; ( ...
Application Essay Rubric Excellent Good Acceptable .docx
Application Essay Rubric
Excellent Good Acceptable Unacceptable Score
Content
(40 points)
(20 points) (17 points) (17 points) (27 points)
Criteria
The essay illustrates
exemplary understanding
of the course material by
thoroughly and correctly:
(1) addressing the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct terminology;
(4) explaining the
reasoning behind key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
points with several
accurate and original
examples.
The essay illustrates
solid understanding of
the course material by
correctly: (1) addressing
most of the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining most of
the key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the reasoning
behind most of the key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
some points with
accurate examples.
The essay illustrates
rudimentary understanding
of the course material by:
(1) mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the key
concepts/ideas (though
failing to fully or accurately
explain many of them); (3)
using terminology, though
sometimes inaccurately or
inappropriately; and (4)
incorporating some key
claims/points, but failing to
explain the reasoning
behind them (or doing so
inaccurately).
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing the
relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology
Reasoning
(40 points)
(20 points) (17 points) (17 points) (14 points)
Criteria
The essay reflects expert
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material;
(2) making connections
between relevant
ideas/claims/points; (3)
presenting an insightful
and thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue or
problem; (4) identifying
and discussing important
nuances in the relevant
material; and (5)
identifying and discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
The essay reflects fairly
strong reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material,
(2) making appropriate
connections between
some of the key
ideas/claims/points; (3)
accurately evaluating the
issue/problem; and (4)
identifying ad discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
The essay reflects basic
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some of
the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2) making a
few connections between
ideas/claims/points, but
ignoring or inaccurately
connecting others; (3)
evaluating the
issue/problem at a very
basic/superficial level; and
(4) ignoring assumptions
and i.
Week 3 Assignment - OnboardingInstructionsThe first written as.docx
Week 3 Assignment - Onboarding
Instructions
The first written assignment for this course is due in Week 3 and requires you to draw upon what you have learned in the first 3 weeks of class to analyze the total rewards system offered by two well-known organizations, L.L. Bean and Aflac.
To complete the assignment, you will need to read the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) case study,
Benefits and Business at Aflac and L.L. Bean
, that is posted at the bottom of this page. After reading the case study, you are to answer the questions below. Be sure to incorporate appropriate scholarly and practitioner references to support your key ideas. The total length of your assignment should be no more than 5-6 pages, not including the cover page and reference list. The assignment is worth 100 points and 20% of your total grade. It will be scored according to the corresponding grading rubric that is posted at the end of this page.
Case Study Questions. Pick
one
of the companies presented in the SHRM case study, either Aflac or L.L. Bean, and answer the following:
Think about the internal strengths and weaknesses of the company. How, if at all, did the firm respond to these factors from a total rewards perspective? 25 points
Consider the external opportunities and threats of the company. How, if at all, did the firm respond to these factors from a total rewards perspective? 25 points
Given the corporate values of the organization, what revisions would you make to its benefits program in order to better align it with the accomplishment of the company’s organizational goals and values? 50 points
1st Assignment Benefits at AFLAC and LLBean.pdf
rubric:
Written Assignment Grading Rubric
A
B
C
F
Response Quality
50 points/50%
Student directly addresses main question or issue, and adds new insight to the subject not provided in lectures, readings, or class discussions. Student has retained nearly all of the knowledge presented in class, and is able to synthesize this knowledge in new ways and relate to material not covered in the course.
Student competently addresses main question or issue, but does not add much new insight into the subject. That said, it is clear that the student has learned a great deal and is able to communicate this knowledge to others.
Student attempts to address main question or issue, but fails. The student has retained some information from the course, but does not fully understand its meaning or context and cannot clearly convey it to others.
Student does not address main question or issue, and it is obvious that the student has not retained pertinent information from the course or is not able to clearly convey that information to others.
Evidence
20 points/20%
Provides compelling and accurate evidence that convinces reader to accept main argument (s). The importance/relevance of all pieces of evidence is clearly stated. There are no gaps in reasoni ...
Module 1 Masters Prepared Nurse Interview Guide Criteria.docx
Module 1: Master's Prepared Nurse Interview Guide
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
80%
88%
92%
100%
Content – 70%
Introduction
5%
Introduction lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Introduction is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Introduction is clear, forecasting development of the paper.
Introduction is comprehensive; purpose of the paper is present.
Introduction is comprehensive and makes the purpose of the paper clear by restating the thesis.
Career
Overview
15%
Omits major elements and is disorganized.
Describes but fails to paint a clear picture of the nurse's career and/or progression in a logical order.
Addresses most of the primary elements of the individual's career in a logical fashion.
Addresses the primary elements. Reader can easily see purpose.
Thoroughly presents all of the information to portray a clear chronology as well as richness of detail.
Graduate
Education
15%
Omits major elements; is disorganized; and has no depth or detail.
Describes but fails to address some of the elements; lacks depth and detail.
Addresses the same elements but lacks depth and detail.
Necessary elements are present and clearly presented. Decision-making process is evident to the reader.
Thoroughly presents the process that led to the decision to seek graduate education as well as the program itself with clarity, order, and depth.
Present
Position (includes pearls of wisdom)
20%
Omits major elements; information is tangential and disorganized.
Describes but fails to address most of the primary elements in any depth.
Addresses most of the primary elements of the present position with recognition of competencies but lacks detail.
All key elements are presented with clarity.
Thoroughly presents all of the key elements of the present position with emphasis on competencies required. Describes in rich detail, and includes advice given and original insights.
Conclusion
15%
Conclusion lacks any discernible purpose.
Conclusion is insufficiently developed and/or vague.
Conclusion is clear and identifies key points of interview but fails to draw inferences.
Conclusion is clearly evident to the reader. Career opportunities are present.
Conclusion is comprehensive; paints a clear picture of the potential outcomes and career opportunities of graduate education; identifies key points of the interview; and demonstrates insight and interpretation.
Organization and Effectiveness – 20%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7%
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are com ...
Recommended
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docx
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
OFFICE OF INSTRUCTION HLC Academy – Writing Across the Curri.docx
OFFICE OF INSTRUCTION
HLC Academy – Writing Across the Curriculum at Mohave Rubric
The A paper The B paper The C paper The D paper The F paper
Ideas Excels in responding to assignment.
Interesting, demonstrates sophistication of
thought. Central idea/thesis is clearly
communicated, worth developing; limited
enough to be manageable. Paper
recognizes some complexity of its thesis:
may acknowledge its contradictions,
qualifications, or limits and follow out their
logical implications. Understands and
critically evaluates its sources,
appropriately limits and defines terms.
A solid paper, responding appropriately
to assignment. Clearly states a
thesis/central idea, but may have minor
lapses in development. Begins to
acknowledge the complexity of central
idea and the possibility of other points
of view. Shows careful reading of
sources, but may not evaluate them
critically. Attempts to define terms, not
always successful.
Adequate but weaker and less
effective, possibly responding less
well to assignment. Presents central
idea in general terms, often
depending on platitudes or clichés.
Usually does not acknowledge other
views. Shows basic comprehension
of sources, perhaps with lapses in
understanding. If it defines terms,
often depends on dictionary
definition.
Does not have a clear central idea
or does not respond appropriately
to the assignment. Thesis may be
too vague or obvious to be
developed effectively. Paper may
misunderstand sources.
Does not respond to the
assignment, lacks a thesis or central
idea, and may neglect to use
sources where necessary.
Organization &
coherence
Uses a logical structure appropriate to
paper’s subject, purpose, audience, thesis,
and disciplinary field. Sophisticated
transitional sentences often develop one
idea from the previous one or identify their
logical relations. It guides the reader
through the chain of reasoning or
progression of ideas.
Shows a logical progression of ideas and
uses fairly sophisticated transitional
devices; e.g., may move from least to
more important idea. Some logical links
may be faulty, but each paragraph
clearly relates to paper’s central idea.
May list ideas or arrange them
randomly rather than using any
evident logical structure. May use
transitions, but they are likely to be
sequential (first, second, third) rather
than logic-based. While each
paragraph may relate to central idea,
logic is not always clear. Paragraphs
have topic sentences but may be
overly general, and arrangement of
sentences within paragraphs may
lack coherence.
May have random organization,
lacking internal paragraph
coherence and using few or
inappropriate transitions.
Paragraphs may lack topic
sentences or main ideas, or may be
too general or too specific to be
effective. Paragraphs may not all
relate to paper’s thesis.
No appreciable organization; lacks
transitions and coherence.
Support.
Crisis Reflection RubricThe following rubric will be used .docx
Crisis Reflection Rubric
The following rubric will be used to evaluate your writing sample. When preparing your document, please
follow the Five C’s of Effective Writing. Make your writing: Clear, Concise, Correct, Courteous, and
Comprehensive.
Excellent Good Acceptable Unacceptable Score
Content
(20 points
possible)
The essay illustrates
exemplary understanding
of the course material by
thoroughly and correctly:
(1) addressing the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct terminology;
(4) explaining the
reasoning behind key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
points with several
accurate and original
examples.
(20 points)
The essay illustrates
solid understanding of
the course material by
correctly: (1) addressing
most of the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining most of
the key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the reasoning
behind most of the key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
some points with
accurate examples.
(15 points)
The essay illustrates
rudimentary understanding
of the course material by:
(1) mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the key
concepts/ideas (though
failing to fully or accurately
explain many of them); (3)
using terminology, though
sometimes inaccurately or
inappropriately; and (4)
incorporating some key
claims/points, but failing to
explain the reasoning
behind them (or doing so
inaccurately).
(10 points)
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing the
relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology.
(5 points)
Reasoning
(20 points
possible)
The essay reflects expert
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material;
(2) making connections
between relevant
ideas/claims/points; (3)
presenting an insightful
and thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue or
problem; (4) identifying
and discussing important
nuances in the relevant
material; and (5)
identifying and discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(20 points)
The essay reflects fairly
strong reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material,
(2) making appropriate
connections between
some of the key
ideas/claims/points; (3)
accurately evaluating the
issue/problem; and (4)
identifying ad discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(15 points)
The essay reflects basic
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some of
the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2) making a
few connections between
ideas/claims/points, but
ignoring or inaccurately
connecting others; (3)
evaluating the
issue/problem at a ver.
EssayPaper Rubric The following rubric will be used to.docx
Essay/Paper Rubric
The following rubric will be used to evaluate your writing sample. When preparing your document, please
follow the Five C’s of Effective Writing. Make your writing: Clear, Concise, Correct, Courteous, and
Comprehensive.
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Score
Content
(40 points
possible)
The essay illustrates
exemplary understanding
of the course material by
thoroughly and correctly:
(1) addressing the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct terminology;
(4) explaining the
reasoning behind key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
points with several
accurate and original
examples.
(40 points)
The essay illustrates
solid understanding of
the course material by
correctly: (1) addressing
most of the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining most of
the key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the reasoning
behind most of the key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
some points with
accurate examples.
(35 points)
The essay illustrates
rudimentary understanding
of the course material by:
(1) mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the key
concepts/ideas (though
failing to fully or accurately
explain many of them); (3)
using terminology, though
sometimes inaccurately or
inappropriately; and (4)
incorporating some key
claims/points, but failing to
explain the reasoning
behind them (or doing so
inaccurately).
(30 points)
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing the
relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology.
(20 points)
Reasoning
(40 points
possible)
The essay reflects expert
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material;
(2) making connections
between relevant
ideas/claims/points; (3)
presenting an insightful
and thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue or
problem; (4) identifying
and discussing important
nuances in the relevant
material; and (5)
identifying and discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(40 points)
The essay reflects fairly
strong reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material,
(2) making appropriate
connections between
some of the key
ideas/claims/points; (3)
accurately evaluating the
issue/problem; and (4)
identifying ad discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(35 points)
The essay reflects basic
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some of
the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2) making a
few connections between
ideas/claims/points, but
ignoring or inaccurately
connecting others; (.
EssayPaper Rubric The following rubric will be used to.docx
Essay/Paper Rubric
The following rubric will be used to evaluate your writing sample. When preparing your document, please
follow the Five C’s of Effective Writing. Make your writing: Clear, Concise, Correct, Courteous, and
Comprehensive.
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Score
Content
(40 points
possible)
The essay illustrates
exemplary understanding
of the course material by
thoroughly and correctly:
(1) addressing the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct terminology;
(4) explaining the
reasoning behind key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
points with several
accurate and original
examples.
(40 points)
The essay illustrates
solid understanding of
the course material by
correctly: (1) addressing
most of the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining most of
the key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the reasoning
behind most of the key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
some points with
accurate examples.
(35 points)
The essay illustrates
rudimentary understanding
of the course material by:
(1) mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the key
concepts/ideas (though
failing to fully or accurately
explain many of them); (3)
using terminology, though
sometimes inaccurately or
inappropriately; and (4)
incorporating some key
claims/points, but failing to
explain the reasoning
behind them (or doing so
inaccurately).
(30 points)
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing the
relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology.
(20 points)
Reasoning
(40 points
possible)
The essay reflects expert
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material;
(2) making connections
between relevant
ideas/claims/points; (3)
presenting an insightful
and thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue or
problem; (4) identifying
and discussing important
nuances in the relevant
material; and (5)
identifying and discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(40 points)
The essay reflects fairly
strong reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material,
(2) making appropriate
connections between
some of the key
ideas/claims/points; (3)
accurately evaluating the
issue/problem; and (4)
identifying ad discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
(35 points)
The essay reflects basic
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some of
the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2) making a
few connections between
ideas/claims/points, but
ignoring or inaccurately
connecting others; ( ...
Application Essay Rubric Excellent Good Acceptable .docx
Application Essay Rubric
Excellent Good Acceptable Unacceptable Score
Content
(40 points)
(20 points) (17 points) (17 points) (27 points)
Criteria
The essay illustrates
exemplary understanding
of the course material by
thoroughly and correctly:
(1) addressing the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct terminology;
(4) explaining the
reasoning behind key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
points with several
accurate and original
examples.
The essay illustrates
solid understanding of
the course material by
correctly: (1) addressing
most of the relevant
content; (2) identifying
and explaining most of
the key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the reasoning
behind most of the key
points/claims; and (5)
(where necessary or
useful) substantiating
some points with
accurate examples.
The essay illustrates
rudimentary understanding
of the course material by:
(1) mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the key
concepts/ideas (though
failing to fully or accurately
explain many of them); (3)
using terminology, though
sometimes inaccurately or
inappropriately; and (4)
incorporating some key
claims/points, but failing to
explain the reasoning
behind them (or doing so
inaccurately).
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing the
relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology
Reasoning
(40 points)
(20 points) (17 points) (17 points) (14 points)
Criteria
The essay reflects expert
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material;
(2) making connections
between relevant
ideas/claims/points; (3)
presenting an insightful
and thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue or
problem; (4) identifying
and discussing important
nuances in the relevant
material; and (5)
identifying and discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
The essay reflects fairly
strong reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing material,
(2) making appropriate
connections between
some of the key
ideas/claims/points; (3)
accurately evaluating the
issue/problem; and (4)
identifying ad discussing
key assumptions and/or
implications.
The essay reflects basic
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some of
the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2) making a
few connections between
ideas/claims/points, but
ignoring or inaccurately
connecting others; (3)
evaluating the
issue/problem at a very
basic/superficial level; and
(4) ignoring assumptions
and i.
Week 3 Assignment - OnboardingInstructionsThe first written as.docx
Week 3 Assignment - Onboarding
Instructions
The first written assignment for this course is due in Week 3 and requires you to draw upon what you have learned in the first 3 weeks of class to analyze the total rewards system offered by two well-known organizations, L.L. Bean and Aflac.
To complete the assignment, you will need to read the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) case study,
Benefits and Business at Aflac and L.L. Bean
, that is posted at the bottom of this page. After reading the case study, you are to answer the questions below. Be sure to incorporate appropriate scholarly and practitioner references to support your key ideas. The total length of your assignment should be no more than 5-6 pages, not including the cover page and reference list. The assignment is worth 100 points and 20% of your total grade. It will be scored according to the corresponding grading rubric that is posted at the end of this page.
Case Study Questions. Pick
one
of the companies presented in the SHRM case study, either Aflac or L.L. Bean, and answer the following:
Think about the internal strengths and weaknesses of the company. How, if at all, did the firm respond to these factors from a total rewards perspective? 25 points
Consider the external opportunities and threats of the company. How, if at all, did the firm respond to these factors from a total rewards perspective? 25 points
Given the corporate values of the organization, what revisions would you make to its benefits program in order to better align it with the accomplishment of the company’s organizational goals and values? 50 points
1st Assignment Benefits at AFLAC and LLBean.pdf
rubric:
Written Assignment Grading Rubric
A
B
C
F
Response Quality
50 points/50%
Student directly addresses main question or issue, and adds new insight to the subject not provided in lectures, readings, or class discussions. Student has retained nearly all of the knowledge presented in class, and is able to synthesize this knowledge in new ways and relate to material not covered in the course.
Student competently addresses main question or issue, but does not add much new insight into the subject. That said, it is clear that the student has learned a great deal and is able to communicate this knowledge to others.
Student attempts to address main question or issue, but fails. The student has retained some information from the course, but does not fully understand its meaning or context and cannot clearly convey it to others.
Student does not address main question or issue, and it is obvious that the student has not retained pertinent information from the course or is not able to clearly convey that information to others.
Evidence
20 points/20%
Provides compelling and accurate evidence that convinces reader to accept main argument (s). The importance/relevance of all pieces of evidence is clearly stated. There are no gaps in reasoni ...
Module 1 Masters Prepared Nurse Interview Guide Criteria.docx
Module 1: Master's Prepared Nurse Interview Guide
Criteria
% Value
1: Unsatisfactory
2: Less Than Satisfactory
3: Satisfactory
4: Good
5: Excellent
% Scaling
0%
80%
88%
92%
100%
Content – 70%
Introduction
5%
Introduction lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Introduction is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Introduction is clear, forecasting development of the paper.
Introduction is comprehensive; purpose of the paper is present.
Introduction is comprehensive and makes the purpose of the paper clear by restating the thesis.
Career
Overview
15%
Omits major elements and is disorganized.
Describes but fails to paint a clear picture of the nurse's career and/or progression in a logical order.
Addresses most of the primary elements of the individual's career in a logical fashion.
Addresses the primary elements. Reader can easily see purpose.
Thoroughly presents all of the information to portray a clear chronology as well as richness of detail.
Graduate
Education
15%
Omits major elements; is disorganized; and has no depth or detail.
Describes but fails to address some of the elements; lacks depth and detail.
Addresses the same elements but lacks depth and detail.
Necessary elements are present and clearly presented. Decision-making process is evident to the reader.
Thoroughly presents the process that led to the decision to seek graduate education as well as the program itself with clarity, order, and depth.
Present
Position (includes pearls of wisdom)
20%
Omits major elements; information is tangential and disorganized.
Describes but fails to address most of the primary elements in any depth.
Addresses most of the primary elements of the present position with recognition of competencies but lacks detail.
All key elements are presented with clarity.
Thoroughly presents all of the key elements of the present position with emphasis on competencies required. Describes in rich detail, and includes advice given and original insights.
Conclusion
15%
Conclusion lacks any discernible purpose.
Conclusion is insufficiently developed and/or vague.
Conclusion is clear and identifies key points of interview but fails to draw inferences.
Conclusion is clearly evident to the reader. Career opportunities are present.
Conclusion is comprehensive; paints a clear picture of the potential outcomes and career opportunities of graduate education; identifies key points of the interview; and demonstrates insight and interpretation.
Organization and Effectiveness – 20%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7%
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are com ...
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to vaccinations. Please read the following scenario and for your initial post; be sure to address all the questions posed by the scenario and include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Patient #1
: Two five-year-old girls are on your schedule for a kindergarten physical. The foster parent of one of the children indicates she received all her immunization from birth to one year of age, but after that the child has not had any further vaccines. The second child appears to have been vaccinated per the CDC schedule.
Is there a difference in the immunization plan you will initiate today for these two patients? Why or why not?
What immunizations will you be ordering for each of these two patients today?
RUBRIC
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the convers.
El Centro College Psychology Assessment of Critical Thinking Rub.docx
El Centro College: Psychology: Assessment of Critical Thinking Rubric
Rater (Scorer): Amy Kirchhoff Class/Course/Section: PSYC 2301-_____ Student ID: _________________ Date: _________________
40 POINTS TOTAL
Performance
Element
Exemplary
(5)
Proficient
(4)
Developing
(3)
Emerging
(2)
Minimally or Not Present (1 or 0)
Comments
Score
I. Communication
A. Defines problem in own words
B. Explores topic by listing methodologies, goals of study or meta-analysis and findings clearly and with pertinent details
A. Identifies the main idea or problem with numerous supporting details and examples that are organized logically and coherently.
A. Identifies the main idea or problem with some supporting details and examples in an organized manner.
B. Elaborates on study or meta-analysis using professional sources, and mentions other points of view, but does not clarify or support own views in Comments section. Writer's perspective is acceptable but not sequentially formatted.
A. Identifies the main idea or problem with few details or examples in a somewhat organized manner
B. Provides minimal evidence, with little explanation.
A. Identifies the main
idea or problem poorly
with few or no details.
B.Substantial
inaccuracies in reporting the study or meta-analysis, methodologies, variables, or findings. Elaboration
of evidence is insufficient
or not understandable to the reader
A. Does not identify the main idea or problem. States the main idea or problem verbatim from the text (plagiarized).
B. Essentially an opinion paper with faulty descriptors.
5 4 3 2 1 Ø
ϒ ϒ ϒ ϒ ϒ ϒ
N/A ϒ
II. Analysis
A. Compare & contrast available solutions
B. The topic posed is only part of the total. Does student find interesting angles from which to explore the topic(s)?
A. Uses specific inductive or deductive reasoning to make inferences regarding premises; addresses implications and consequences; identifies facts and relevant information correctly.
B. Raises important questions relevant to the assigned topic in Comments section and answers them with evidence from professional sources.
A. Uses logical reasoning to make inferences regarding solutions; addresses implications and consequences; Identifies facts and relevant information correctly.
B. Raises questions related to the topic in Comments section but may not provide reader with adequate evidence for why these additional questions should be considered.
A. Uses superficial reasoning to make inferences regarding solutions; shows some confusion regarding facts, opinions, and relevant, evidence, data, or information.
B. Topic explored from only one or two perspectives (i.e., sources).
A. Makes unexplained, unsupported, or unreasonable inferences regarding solutions.
Makes multiple errors in distinguishing fact from fiction or in selecting relevant evidence.
B. Fails ...
#35537 Topic Course Project Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Pra.docx
#35537 Topic: Course Project: Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Practice. Continuation of the assignment attached
Number of Pages: 3 (Double Spaced)
Number of sources: 3
Writing Style: APA
Type of document: Coursework
Academic Level:Master
Category: Nursing
VIP Support: N/A
Language Style: English (U.S.)
Order Instructions: Attached
In Part 3 of the Course Project, you consider how the evidence you gathered during Part 2 can be translated into nursing practice.
Now that you have located available research on your PICOT question, you will examine what the research indicates about nursing practices. Connecting research evidence and findings to actual decisions and tasks that nurses complete in their daily practice is essentially what evidence-based practice is all about. This final component of the Course Project asks you to translate the evidence and data from your literature review into authentic practices that can be adopted to improve health care outcomes. In addition, you will also consider possible methods and strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to your colleagues and to the broader health care field.
To prepare:
Consider Parts 1 and 2 of your Course Project. How does the research address your PICOT question?
With your PICOT question in mind, identify at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in two or more of the articles from your literature review. Consider what the evidence indicates about how this practice contributes to better outcomes.
Explore possible consequences of failing to adopt the evidence-based practice that you identified.
Consider how you would disseminate information about this evidence-based practice throughout your organization or practice setting. How would you communicate the importance of the practice?
To complete:
In a 3- to 4-page paper:
Restate your PICOT question and its significance to nursing practice.
Summarize the findings from the articles you selected for your literature review. Describe at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in the articles. Justify your response with specific references to at least 2 of the articles.
Explain how the evidence-based practice that you identified contributes to better outcomes. In addition, identify potential negative outcomes that could result from failing to use the evidence-based practice.
Outline the strategy for disseminating the evidence-based practice that you identified throughout your practice setting. Explain how you would communicate the importance of the practice to your colleagues. Describe how you would move from disseminating the information to implementing the evidence-based practice within your organization. How would you address concerns and opposition to the change in practice?It should be combined with the other two components of the Course Project and turned in as your Portfolio Assignment for this course.
IMPORTANT
Reminder: The School of Nursing requires th.
Motivational Interview PaperA. Introduction Overview of Motivat.docx
Motivational Interview Paper
A. Introduction: Overview of Motivational Interviewing:
Begin your paper by providing an overview of Motivational Interviewing (MI). Ensure you include one article and summarize the main components of MI and populations that are appropriate to use the MI principles.
B. Assessment of Videos:
Using the key components of MI, assess the role play videos in your chosen video for appropriate integration.
C. Discriminatory Analysis Section:
What would you do differently or similarly in the video you chose to analyze? Provide rationales that are specific utilizing sources for substance and depth.
D. Plan and Summary:
Integrate evidence-based information using one to two scholarly articles in your plan and summary of the scenario you watched (opioid or alcohol). How does the concept of coping play out in the scenario you watched? Integrate coping psychotherapeutic skills, as well as teaching and education, into your plan and summary.
Paper Requirements
Your paper should be three to four pages in length, excluding a required cover sheet and references page that includes one to two textbooks and two to three scholarly articles (that were published no longer than three years ago). Use APA formatting for all components of your paper.
https://youtu.be/XsmY1VVxUIE
https://youtu.be/67I6g1I7Zao
Writing Assignment Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Writing Assignment Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Content of Paper
The writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The paper content and theories are well developed and linked to the paper requirements and practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and components of the paper are accurately represented with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Course materials and scholarly resources support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references.
All instruction requirements noted.
26 points
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter as evidenced by components of t.
Motivational Interview PaperA. Introduction Overview of Motivat.docx
Motivational Interview Paper
A. Introduction: Overview of Motivational Interviewing:
Begin your paper by providing an overview of Motivational Interviewing (MI). Ensure you include one article and summarize the main components of MI and populations that are appropriate to use the MI principles.
B. Assessment of Videos:
Using the key components of MI, assess the role play videos in your chosen video for appropriate integration.
C. Discriminatory Analysis Section:
What would you do differently or similarly in the video you chose to analyze? Provide rationales that are specific utilizing sources for substance and depth.
D. Plan and Summary:
Integrate evidence-based information using one to two scholarly articles in your plan and summary of the scenario you watched (opioid or alcohol). How does the concept of coping play out in the scenario you watched? Integrate coping psychotherapeutic skills, as well as teaching and education, into your plan and summary.
Paper Requirements
Your paper should be three to four pages in length, excluding a required cover sheet and references page that includes one to two textbooks and two to three scholarly articles (that were published no longer than three years ago). Use APA formatting for all components of your paper.
https://youtu.be/XsmY1VVxUIE
https://youtu.be/67I6g1I7Zao
Writing Assignment Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Writing Assignment Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Content of Paper
The writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The paper content and theories are well developed and linked to the paper requirements and practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and components of the paper are accurately represented with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Course materials and scholarly resources support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references.
All instruction requirements noted.
26 points
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter as evidenced by components of t ...
These are Statistic answers needed. If this is not your specialty, p.docx
This document outlines three statistical assignments requiring the use of Excel and t-tests. Assignment 1 involves calculating the correlation between two variables using Excel. Assignment 2 involves performing an independent t-test using Excel to compare the means of two groups and determining if there is a significant difference. Assignment 3 requires analyzing a research article, completing a worksheet, and writing a 500-750 word essay explaining why a t-test was the appropriate statistical analysis and why another statistical tool would not be relevant. Rubrics are provided to grade each assignment.
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
Argumentative Essay
by mutiu Olokodana
Submission date: 28-Jan-2020 02:37AM (UTC-0500)
Submission ID: 1247589300
File name: temp_turnitintool_600359574.DoesTechnologyPromoteLoneliness.docx (18.59K)
Word count: 841
Character count: 4498
10. Recycled
42%
SIMILARITY INDEX
9%
INTERNET SOURCES
5%
PUBLICATIONS
42%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 29%
2 5%
3 3%
4 2%
5 1%
6 1%
7 1%
Argumentative Essay
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Straighterline
Student Paper
Submitted to University of North Carolina -
Wilmington
Student Paper
Submitted to Cave Creek Unified District
Student Paper
Submitted to Saint Paul College
Student Paper
Submitted to Squalicum High School
Student Paper
Submitted to Grant MacEwan Community
College
Student Paper
Submitted to American Public University System
Student Paper
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography Off
Exclude matches Off
QM
FINAL GRADE
0/100
Argumentative Essay
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
10. Recycled
Unfortunately, your essay is reworded from a paper that was already submitted to Straighterline or
another university. This is a type of plagiarism called recycling, which is unacceptable by
Straighterline policy. Therefore, you will need to completely rewrite a new essay with a new topic in
order for a submission under this assignment to be accepted and graded.
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
RUBRIC: ENG101 V6:ARGUMENTATIVE FINAL
THESIS (20%)
POINTS
(0)
POINTS
(2)
POINTS
(3)
POINTS
(3.50)
POINTS
(4)
POINTS
(5)
SUPPORT & DEV (15%)
POINTS
(0)
POINTS
(2)
POINTS
(3)
POINTS
(3.50)
0 / 5
0 / 5
Thesis, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions
Thesis or potential thesis is neither present in any portion of the essay, nor is it implied in
any manner. Thesis may be present but incorrect for the assignment’s
objectives/approach. Thesis may be present but the submission overall fails to meet most
assignment objectives (such as the essay is only a paragraph) that determining the thesis’
viability is problematic.
Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Readers
cannot discern the essay’s central idea.
Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed. Reveals limited
awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently
addressed.
Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic.
Awareness of audience may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too
general and supported by irrelevant examples.
Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper.
Awareness of audience is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the
essay.
Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Paper
demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus
maintained throughout.
0 / 5
Thesis support, thesis development, use of examples, logic, ...
Page 1 of 4 Midterm Project Assignment Select a .docx
This document provides instructions for a midterm project assignment. Students are asked to select a term related to cross-cultural education/counseling and conduct a literature search to answer questions about the term's definition and use. The assignment should be 2 pages maximum and follow APA formatting guidelines. It will be graded based on introduction, focus, ideas/support, conclusion, structure/organization, and other writing elements.
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but ...
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
Paper Grade Rubric
1. Significantly insufficient
(6 points)
2. Insufficient
(7 points)
3. Sufficient
(8 points)
4. Good
(9 points)
5. Excellent
(10 points)
Description of Event
Description of event significantly lacks details relevant to concept; only direct citations included or copying existing definitions.
Many relevant facts are missing or inaccurate; more research was needed. Included existing definition by others.
Most facts are relevant and presented accurately; some factual information is misleading or inaccurate; put into both students own words and existing definition.
Details not missing, and are adequate and relevant to the concept; defined using student’s own words.
Concept defined and described completely, put into students own words; other details are complete and fully relevant to the concept.
Interpretation of Event
No concept presented, used, or defined. Weak/no argument presented.
No module concept defined, partial argument; interpretation is inconsistent with concept.
Concept defined but no argument/weak support of argument; interpretation is partly consistent with concept
Concept correctly defined and well presented; argument is somewhat unclear; interpretation is mostly consistent with concept
Understanding of event is correct, and is expanded through exceptional use of concept
Evaluation of Event
No concept presented or use of concept does little or distracts from the understating of event; no evaluation presented
Concept presented but support is weak or lacking, no argument or weak support of argument
Concept presented, very weak argument
Concept defined and clearly presented, evaluation is inconsistent with concept or unclear.
Concept fully integrated into evaluation; understandings of event is expended through the concept
Organization and Grammar of Writing
Organization of paper is inconsistent and distracting from the thesis, significant grammatical errors and typos (more than 7).
Organization of paper only partly supportive of the thesis; substantial grammatical errors and typo (5 to 7), awkward language
Organization of paper somewhat inconsistent with thesis; some grammatical or spelling errors (around 4 to 2)
Organization of paper clear and content organized to support thesis; minor grammatical or spelling errors (fewer than 2)
Organization flawless and fully supports thesis; no grammatical errors nor typos.
Information Literacy
Fewer than five sources, sources are not diverse or not relevant; no or incomplete credibility assessment.; no reference page and in-text citations.
Weak diversity, relevance and credibility assessment of sources. Lacking citations, or wrong format of citations, incorrect citation style.
Adequate diversity and credibility assessment. Lacking some citations, inconsistent citation styles throughout the paper
Good diversity and credibility assessment of sources; minor citation errors.
Exceptional diversity of sources and credibility assessment; correct references and in-text citations.
· ...
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443
Case Study 3 Instructions: Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet
You will complete the “Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet” case in the Nkomo et al. text (#35 on pp. 112–113, 2011). You will write a 3–5-page essay (total does not include title page or reference page) that answers the 4 questions (1–4) on p. 113. Do not simply answer the questions. This is an essay and must be written to include an introduction, body, and conclusion. It may prove helpful to use the topic of the questions (advantages and disadvantages of internet recruitment and selection, the three approaches to online recruiting and selection, etc.) as section headers in your essay. Your response must be supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed resources. These resources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use other textbooks. The essay must be written in current APA format and include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations.
Note: This case study will not use the “small groups” described on p. 113 to answer the 4 questions.
Submit your assignment through SafeAssign as a draft to check for plagiarism before submitting it for points.
Data Analysis Plan
Details:
After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· Locate the data collection procedures you developed in Module 5 to use as reference material for this assignment.
· Locate the mission statement and program description from the existing organization that you referenced in Module 2 to use as examples for this assignment.
· Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Based on ...
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Topic : Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what physiological effects this could have. Provide an example of a patient in which you might check these labs, perform a test, given an injection etc. and how the results or your new knowledge would or could affect your plan of care?
The topic come from Chapter 24 of your text. You may use the textbook as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, you must also locate a scholarly article related to your aging discussion question. Your question should be stated in your initial discussion post and answered based on pathophysiological principles and specifically those related to aging. Remember, you should focus on the pathophysiology of the content for your initial and peer replies as well as applying your knowledge to Advanced Practice Nursing.
RUBRIC:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides add ...
In this SLP, you will prepare a presentation in which you provide .docx
In this SLP, you will prepare a presentation in which you provide your audience with information on the following areas:
1. Introduce the immune system.
2. Explain the differences between antibody mediated immunity and cell mediated immunity.
3. List one example of antibody mediated and cell mediated immunity.
ASSIGNMENT EXPECTATIONS
Number of Slides: 15
Content of Slides: Your presentation should address each of the areas listed above.
Speaker Notes
Each slide will contain speaker notes sufficient to tell me what the purpose of each slide is—specifically, what you would say to a live audience that you were presenting your program to.
SLP: Second Part
Many healthcare programs have modified their operational design and culture to one of being patient-centered while being fiscally viable. As part of your interview of a healthcare manager or executive selected for module 1 discuss how the program was or will be transformed to be patient-centered. In your discussion please address the following questions.
1. How was the program restructured or reengineered to adapt to internal and external factors impacting it?
2. What internal and external factors were considered in the transformation?
3. What were the barriers or obstacles were encountered (e.g. internal politics, economics, resource limitations, time constraints, etc.).
4. What is the potential impact on the program of technology, legislation, etc on the services provided on the program.
*Please note that you may add any additional questions that tie into the themes presented in module 2.
Expectations
Assignment Expectations:
1. Be sure to conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to familiarize yourself with the facts of the case and be sure to justify/support your position.
2. Limit your responses to a maximum of three pages.
3. Please support your discussions with scholarly support (3-5 references). Be sure to properly cite all references.
4. Apply critical thinking skills the the assignment component.
5. I will grade your paper on your ability to address the assignment criteria listed above with depth and breadth of discussion. I will also critique your writing format (i.e. proper reference citations, spacing, etc.).
Your case paper will be further evaluated based on the following criteria:
Precision (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· Each question and or assignment requirement is addressed in the paper
· Accuracy of your answers, key points and supporting discussion
Clarity (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· The paper is well organized, concise, reads clearly, and it is not confusing.
Breadth (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· The paper presents appropriate breadth covering the assignment questions/requirements
Depth (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· Presents key points that lead to deeper matters and issues
· Integrates several points into coherent conclusions
Critical Thinking (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· The paper demonstrates good under.
Faculty of Business and LawaCADEMIC YEAR 201819asse.docx
Faculty of Business and Law
aCADEMIC YEAR 2018/19
assessment brief
Module Code:
UMKD6R-15-3
Module Title:
Marketing Services
Submission Deadline:
Wednesday 13th March 2019
Assessment Component
Coursework
Assessment Weighting:
50 per cent of total module mark
Marking and feedback deadline (20 working days)
10th April 2019
Assessment Instructions
This is an individual case-based assignment that requires you to answer a question in relation to the case study below: ‘Woodchurch Furniture’.
Question: Using services marketing theory, analyse and explain Woodchurch’s loss of customersand recommendhow it might improve the customer experience. (100 marks)
General Guidance
· The coursework requires you to select and apply theories, frameworks, and concepts from the first six study units of the module.
· It is your decision as to what theories/frameworks/concepts to use to inform your answer. There is no recommended minimum or maximum number, but generally, quality of application is more important than the quantity of frameworks applied.
· Remember that the requirement is to apply rather than describe theory.
· You may use subheadings in your answer, but avoid excessive use of bullet points.
· Do not reiterate passages from the case study. Obviously, you will need to refer to the case, but do this as succinctly as you can.
· Evidence of relevant reading beyond the lecture slides, with appropriate application of this reading, will be rewarded. Besides textbooks, you may want to explore relevant articles from Journal of Services Marketing,Journal of Service Research, or Service Industries Journal. Other journals will haverelevant articles, but, as implied by their titles, these three focus on services.
· Include a title page, contents, and references. There is no need for an abstract or executive summary. Please number your pages.
Marking Criteria
Please see the grid below:
Criteria
Grading
Analysis (35%)
Recommendations (35%)
Structure (20%)
Literacy, presentation, referencing (10%)
80-100 PASS
Exceptional
Insightful analysis with originality of thought. Identifies underlying issue(s). Excellent application of theory. Demonstrates excellent integration of relevant literature from outside the module reading list.
Highly appropriate, with originality of thought. Consistent with issues raised in the analysis. Exceptional clarity and detail. Supported wherever possible by theory / literature.
Exceptional organization and flow of material with excellent connections between ideas. Introduction is specific and signposts. Conclusion synthesises and may highlight implications of recommendations.
Exceptional standard of literacy and presentation. Near faultless referencing.
70-79 PASS
Excellent
Insightful analysis. Identifies underlying issue(s). Excellent application of theory. Demonstrates excellent integration of relevant literature from outside the module reading list.
Excellent and appropriate, with some originality of thought. Consist.
The name of the company is South west airlinei chose action pla.docx
The name of the company is South west airline
i chose action plan and evaluative plan
Final Project: Final Paper, Presentation, and Peer Assessment
This assignment is a group project. Students will be placed into groups consisting of groups of four or five students each. Groups will be assigned early, and the expectation is that the groups will work on the various parts of the assignment as relevant material is covered throughout the course. The group will act as a self-directed team, and will therefore determine its own timetable, task list, guidelines for communication, goals, and so forth. As an individual, you are expected to participate fully in the project. Everyone in your group will receive the same grade for the project.
Your group will create a strategic plan and present the plan in a professional manner. The plan requires a paper turn in to the Assignment Folder and a PowerPoint presentation that is presented in the last week of class.
All students in the group will receive the same grade for the final paper and the presentation.
However, if a student fails to contribute to the project, the student will earn a zero for the assignment and/or PowerPoint presentation.
By completing this assignment, students will meet the outcome(s):
examine the impact of ethical decision making, social responsibility, stakeholder analysis, and corporate governance on organizations and society
formulate and evaluate an organization's vision and mission statement, and develop long-term objectives
analyze and synthesize strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) to generate, prioritize, and implement alternative strategies in order to write and present a strategic plan
evaluate the outcomes of selected strategies to determine their success and impact on the achievement of an organization's vision and mission
Required Elements to include in Applied Final Project:
The strategic plan should include:
Ø vision and mission
Ø background organization
Ø industry analysis
Ø competitive analysis
Ø financial analysis
Ø technique analysis (using one technique from chapter 6)
Ø alternative strategy generation
Ø SWOT analysis
Ø strategy and prioritization selection
Ø action plan
Ø evaluative plan
Identify strategies
Discuss strategies used at the corporate, business and function levels using the concepts learned in the course.
Demonstrate critical thinking in the assessment.
Required Formatting of Paper:
This report should be double spaced, 12-point font, 20 - 25 pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;
This paper should be written in the third person. No script should contain the words “I or we;”
Title page with your name, the course name, the date, and instructor’s name;
Include a reference page;
Use APA formatting for in-text citations and reference page. You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;
Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.
This entry should be a 500-750 word description of the topic. The as.docx
This entry should be a 500-750 word description of the topic. The assignment should present a description of the topic with a purpose statement. Review the pathophysiology of the disorder, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment plan per current guidelines. Review Healthy People 2020 and standard preventative guidelines regarding screening for STDs and research the possibility of drug-resistant strains within your state/region.
Topic is : Gonorrhea
Rubric:
Case Study Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Case Study Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsContent of Case StudyThe writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the case study subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The case study content and theories are well developed and linked to the course content, assignment requirements, and practical experience. The case study includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the assignment.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
30 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and the components of the case study are accurately represented with evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role content. Course materials and scholarly resources are present to support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the case study.
Cites two references.
26 points
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter, as evidenced by components of the case study and use of evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Cites only one reference.
23 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
Significant content of case study is vague, inaccurately portrayed, or missing.
No references cited.
Submits assignment late.
20 points30
Analysis and Synthesis of Case Study Content and MeaningThrough critical analysis, the submitted case study provides an accurate, clear, concise, and complete summary of the scenario.
Information from scholarly resources is synthesized, providing new information or insight related to the context of the assignment by providing both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
Case study is complete, providing evidence of further synthesis of course content via .
Hbel 3203 teaching of grammar asgnmt qns
1. The document provides instructions for an assignment on teaching grammar for an education course. Students are asked to write a report analyzing their use of tenses in short essays and describing the grammar instruction methods used.
2. The assignment requires students to teach present and past tenses to others, have them write short essays, and analyze their ability to use tenses accurately. Students must justify their choice of explicit or implicit grammar instruction methods.
3. The report will be evaluated based on introduction, data collection method, analysis of instruction methods, analysis of tense use in essays, conclusion, and organization. Students must attach at least 5 essays for full marks.
10 25 Points.docx
This document provides instructions for a nursing assignment. It outlines the purpose, course outcomes, grading rubric, and requirements for the assignment. Students are asked to write a paper on a nursing topic based on evidence from a recent scholarly journal article. The paper must include an introduction, body, and conclusion section. It must be formatted according to APA style and cannot exceed two pages. Sources must be from nursing journals published within the last five years. The document provides detailed descriptions of the criteria and point values for each section of the paper.
Assignment 2 Audit Planning and ControlDue Week 8 and worth 280.docx
Assignment 2: Audit Planning and Control
Due Week 8 and worth 280 points
It is common industry knowledge that an audit plan provides the specific guidelines auditors must follow when conducting an external audit. External public accounting firms conduct external audits to ensure outside stakeholders that the company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) standards.
Use the Internet to select a public accounting company that appeals to you. Imagine that you are a senior partner in a public accounting firm hired to complete an audit for the chosen public company.
Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
1. Outline the critical steps inherent in planning an audit and designing an effective audit program. Based upon the type of company selected, provide specific details of the actions that the company should undertake during planning and designing the audit program.
1. Examine at least two (2) performance ratios that you would use in order to determine which analytical tests to perform. Identify the accounts that you would test, and select at least three (3) analytical procedures that you would use in your audit.
1. Analyze the balance sheet and income statement of the company that you have selected, and outline your method for evidence collection which should include, but not be limited to, the type of evidence to collect and the manner in which you would determine the sufficiency of the evidence.
1. Discuss the audit risk model, and ascertain which sampling or non-sampling techniques you would use in order to establish your preliminary judgment about materiality. Justify your response.
1. Assuming that the end result is an unqualified audit report, outline the primary responsibilities of the audit firm after it issues the report in question.
1. Use at least two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
1. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
1. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
1. Plan and design a generalized audit program.
1. Determine the nature and extent of evidence accumulated to conduct an audit after considering the unique circumstances of an engagement.
1. Evaluate a company’s various risk factors and the related impact to the audit process.
1. Evaluate effective internal controls that minimize audit risk and pote ...
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
Eng 101
e3 The “Summary + Response” ESSAY: Writing based on reading about language, culture & identity
The summary+response essay requires you to use and engage with other written materials - that is, ideas and quotations from other writers - in an essay.
Articles: Tan, "Mother Tongue" (127-132)
In your essay, you will (A) present the writer's ideas accurately and fairly, using your skills in summarizing, paraphrasing, and using quotations. And you will (B) present a thoughtful response, in which you take a stand on the major issue of the original.
You don't need additional information from the internet and you don't need to look for any more sources. If you do want to use another source, you need to clear it with your instructor.
Preliminary Steps
1. Read, re-read, annotate the article you chose.
2. Complete the "Responding to Writing" worksheet to help clarify and organize your thoughts on the issues.
3. Be able to summarize and paraphrase the material accurately.
A Possible Outline for Your Essay
Your essay might be organized something like this, in which each of the first-level bullets would be one or more ¶s:
• Open: Introduce the issues in a general way, possibly without mentioning the article/author yet.
• Introduce & briefly summarize the main article:
· Summarize the main, relevant ideas of the article and include important details. (Include the author's full name and title of the article.)
· Note that you will also refer to and summarize and quote from the article in the response section of the essay, so you don't need to provide a complete, detailed summary here.
• Respond:
· You will probably use some of the ideas you generated in the "Responding to Writing" worksheet.
· Discuss and offer some analysis of the issues raised in the article, and possibly comment on how the author has presented them, how convincing her/his evidence is, and so on.
· Present your own perspectives, thoughts, and perhaps feelings on the issues. You might describe your own life experiences or experiences of friends, as they relate to the issues in question.
· In this response section you need to be sure to explain your ideas clearly and support them (with logic, with illustrative examples, maybe with more quotes from the article).
· If you wish, you can bring in a couple of ideas/quotes from one or two of the additional articles to supplement or support your points.
· This section should be presented in logically organized, focused paragraphs.
• Close: Wrap up the essay in a meaningful and satisfying way.
Think it through!
Don't just grab onto the first thought that comes to you, an initial and superficial reaction. Consider your thoughts and feelings, think hard about the topic and what you have read about it, and form a coherent and thoughtful response.
In a thoughtful response, you don't need to solve or resolve the problem or the issue. You don't have to try to have the "last word" on the topic. Saying that it's troubling (or not) or an im ...
For this assignment, review the articleAbomhara, M., & Koie.docx
For this assignment, review the article:
Abomhara, M., & Koien, G.M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks.
Journal of Cyber Security, 4
, 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.414
and evaluate it in 3 pages (800 words), in APA format with in-text citation using your own words, by addressing the following:
What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they do so?
Identify the hypothesis or question being tested
Summarize the overall article.
Identify the conclusions of the authors
Indicate whether or not you think the data support their conclusions/hypothesis
Consider alternative explanations for the results
Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches to testing their hypothesis (logical follow-up studies to build on, confirm or refute the conclusions)
The relevance or importance of the study
The appropriateness of the experimental design
When you write your evaluation, be brief and concise, this is not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) you turn in your evaluation. This is good practice for your literature review, which you’ll be completing during the dissertation process.
.
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus N.docx
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus National Security
. This is a particularly "hot topic" because of recent actions by the federal government taken against Apple. So, please use information from reliable sources to support your perspective.
This assignment should be 1.5 pages in length, using Times New Roman font (size 12), double spaced on a Word documen
.
More Related Content
Similar to image7.pngimage8.png.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to vaccinations. Please read the following scenario and for your initial post; be sure to address all the questions posed by the scenario and include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.
Patient #1
: Two five-year-old girls are on your schedule for a kindergarten physical. The foster parent of one of the children indicates she received all her immunization from birth to one year of age, but after that the child has not had any further vaccines. The second child appears to have been vaccinated per the CDC schedule.
Is there a difference in the immunization plan you will initiate today for these two patients? Why or why not?
What immunizations will you be ordering for each of these two patients today?
RUBRIC
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the convers.
El Centro College Psychology Assessment of Critical Thinking Rub.docx
El Centro College: Psychology: Assessment of Critical Thinking Rubric
Rater (Scorer): Amy Kirchhoff Class/Course/Section: PSYC 2301-_____ Student ID: _________________ Date: _________________
40 POINTS TOTAL
Performance
Element
Exemplary
(5)
Proficient
(4)
Developing
(3)
Emerging
(2)
Minimally or Not Present (1 or 0)
Comments
Score
I. Communication
A. Defines problem in own words
B. Explores topic by listing methodologies, goals of study or meta-analysis and findings clearly and with pertinent details
A. Identifies the main idea or problem with numerous supporting details and examples that are organized logically and coherently.
A. Identifies the main idea or problem with some supporting details and examples in an organized manner.
B. Elaborates on study or meta-analysis using professional sources, and mentions other points of view, but does not clarify or support own views in Comments section. Writer's perspective is acceptable but not sequentially formatted.
A. Identifies the main idea or problem with few details or examples in a somewhat organized manner
B. Provides minimal evidence, with little explanation.
A. Identifies the main
idea or problem poorly
with few or no details.
B.Substantial
inaccuracies in reporting the study or meta-analysis, methodologies, variables, or findings. Elaboration
of evidence is insufficient
or not understandable to the reader
A. Does not identify the main idea or problem. States the main idea or problem verbatim from the text (plagiarized).
B. Essentially an opinion paper with faulty descriptors.
5 4 3 2 1 Ø
ϒ ϒ ϒ ϒ ϒ ϒ
N/A ϒ
II. Analysis
A. Compare & contrast available solutions
B. The topic posed is only part of the total. Does student find interesting angles from which to explore the topic(s)?
A. Uses specific inductive or deductive reasoning to make inferences regarding premises; addresses implications and consequences; identifies facts and relevant information correctly.
B. Raises important questions relevant to the assigned topic in Comments section and answers them with evidence from professional sources.
A. Uses logical reasoning to make inferences regarding solutions; addresses implications and consequences; Identifies facts and relevant information correctly.
B. Raises questions related to the topic in Comments section but may not provide reader with adequate evidence for why these additional questions should be considered.
A. Uses superficial reasoning to make inferences regarding solutions; shows some confusion regarding facts, opinions, and relevant, evidence, data, or information.
B. Topic explored from only one or two perspectives (i.e., sources).
A. Makes unexplained, unsupported, or unreasonable inferences regarding solutions.
Makes multiple errors in distinguishing fact from fiction or in selecting relevant evidence.
B. Fails ...
#35537 Topic Course Project Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Pra.docx
#35537 Topic: Course Project: Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Practice. Continuation of the assignment attached
Number of Pages: 3 (Double Spaced)
Number of sources: 3
Writing Style: APA
Type of document: Coursework
Academic Level:Master
Category: Nursing
VIP Support: N/A
Language Style: English (U.S.)
Order Instructions: Attached
In Part 3 of the Course Project, you consider how the evidence you gathered during Part 2 can be translated into nursing practice.
Now that you have located available research on your PICOT question, you will examine what the research indicates about nursing practices. Connecting research evidence and findings to actual decisions and tasks that nurses complete in their daily practice is essentially what evidence-based practice is all about. This final component of the Course Project asks you to translate the evidence and data from your literature review into authentic practices that can be adopted to improve health care outcomes. In addition, you will also consider possible methods and strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to your colleagues and to the broader health care field.
To prepare:
Consider Parts 1 and 2 of your Course Project. How does the research address your PICOT question?
With your PICOT question in mind, identify at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in two or more of the articles from your literature review. Consider what the evidence indicates about how this practice contributes to better outcomes.
Explore possible consequences of failing to adopt the evidence-based practice that you identified.
Consider how you would disseminate information about this evidence-based practice throughout your organization or practice setting. How would you communicate the importance of the practice?
To complete:
In a 3- to 4-page paper:
Restate your PICOT question and its significance to nursing practice.
Summarize the findings from the articles you selected for your literature review. Describe at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in the articles. Justify your response with specific references to at least 2 of the articles.
Explain how the evidence-based practice that you identified contributes to better outcomes. In addition, identify potential negative outcomes that could result from failing to use the evidence-based practice.
Outline the strategy for disseminating the evidence-based practice that you identified throughout your practice setting. Explain how you would communicate the importance of the practice to your colleagues. Describe how you would move from disseminating the information to implementing the evidence-based practice within your organization. How would you address concerns and opposition to the change in practice?It should be combined with the other two components of the Course Project and turned in as your Portfolio Assignment for this course.
IMPORTANT
Reminder: The School of Nursing requires th.
Motivational Interview PaperA. Introduction Overview of Motivat.docx
Motivational Interview Paper
A. Introduction: Overview of Motivational Interviewing:
Begin your paper by providing an overview of Motivational Interviewing (MI). Ensure you include one article and summarize the main components of MI and populations that are appropriate to use the MI principles.
B. Assessment of Videos:
Using the key components of MI, assess the role play videos in your chosen video for appropriate integration.
C. Discriminatory Analysis Section:
What would you do differently or similarly in the video you chose to analyze? Provide rationales that are specific utilizing sources for substance and depth.
D. Plan and Summary:
Integrate evidence-based information using one to two scholarly articles in your plan and summary of the scenario you watched (opioid or alcohol). How does the concept of coping play out in the scenario you watched? Integrate coping psychotherapeutic skills, as well as teaching and education, into your plan and summary.
Paper Requirements
Your paper should be three to four pages in length, excluding a required cover sheet and references page that includes one to two textbooks and two to three scholarly articles (that were published no longer than three years ago). Use APA formatting for all components of your paper.
https://youtu.be/XsmY1VVxUIE
https://youtu.be/67I6g1I7Zao
Writing Assignment Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Writing Assignment Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Content of Paper
The writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The paper content and theories are well developed and linked to the paper requirements and practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and components of the paper are accurately represented with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Course materials and scholarly resources support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references.
All instruction requirements noted.
26 points
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter as evidenced by components of t.
Motivational Interview PaperA. Introduction Overview of Motivat.docx
Motivational Interview Paper
A. Introduction: Overview of Motivational Interviewing:
Begin your paper by providing an overview of Motivational Interviewing (MI). Ensure you include one article and summarize the main components of MI and populations that are appropriate to use the MI principles.
B. Assessment of Videos:
Using the key components of MI, assess the role play videos in your chosen video for appropriate integration.
C. Discriminatory Analysis Section:
What would you do differently or similarly in the video you chose to analyze? Provide rationales that are specific utilizing sources for substance and depth.
D. Plan and Summary:
Integrate evidence-based information using one to two scholarly articles in your plan and summary of the scenario you watched (opioid or alcohol). How does the concept of coping play out in the scenario you watched? Integrate coping psychotherapeutic skills, as well as teaching and education, into your plan and summary.
Paper Requirements
Your paper should be three to four pages in length, excluding a required cover sheet and references page that includes one to two textbooks and two to three scholarly articles (that were published no longer than three years ago). Use APA formatting for all components of your paper.
https://youtu.be/XsmY1VVxUIE
https://youtu.be/67I6g1I7Zao
Writing Assignment Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Writing Assignment Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria
Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Content of Paper
The writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The paper content and theories are well developed and linked to the paper requirements and practical experience. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and components of the paper are accurately represented with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Course materials and scholarly resources support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
Follows the assignment instructions around expectations for scholarly references.
All instruction requirements noted.
26 points
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter as evidenced by components of t ...
These are Statistic answers needed. If this is not your specialty, p.docx
This document outlines three statistical assignments requiring the use of Excel and t-tests. Assignment 1 involves calculating the correlation between two variables using Excel. Assignment 2 involves performing an independent t-test using Excel to compare the means of two groups and determining if there is a significant difference. Assignment 3 requires analyzing a research article, completing a worksheet, and writing a 500-750 word essay explaining why a t-test was the appropriate statistical analysis and why another statistical tool would not be relevant. Rubrics are provided to grade each assignment.
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
Argumentative Essay
by mutiu Olokodana
Submission date: 28-Jan-2020 02:37AM (UTC-0500)
Submission ID: 1247589300
File name: temp_turnitintool_600359574.DoesTechnologyPromoteLoneliness.docx (18.59K)
Word count: 841
Character count: 4498
10. Recycled
42%
SIMILARITY INDEX
9%
INTERNET SOURCES
5%
PUBLICATIONS
42%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 29%
2 5%
3 3%
4 2%
5 1%
6 1%
7 1%
Argumentative Essay
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Straighterline
Student Paper
Submitted to University of North Carolina -
Wilmington
Student Paper
Submitted to Cave Creek Unified District
Student Paper
Submitted to Saint Paul College
Student Paper
Submitted to Squalicum High School
Student Paper
Submitted to Grant MacEwan Community
College
Student Paper
Submitted to American Public University System
Student Paper
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography Off
Exclude matches Off
QM
FINAL GRADE
0/100
Argumentative Essay
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
10. Recycled
Unfortunately, your essay is reworded from a paper that was already submitted to Straighterline or
another university. This is a type of plagiarism called recycling, which is unacceptable by
Straighterline policy. Therefore, you will need to completely rewrite a new essay with a new topic in
order for a submission under this assignment to be accepted and graded.
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
RUBRIC: ENG101 V6:ARGUMENTATIVE FINAL
THESIS (20%)
POINTS
(0)
POINTS
(2)
POINTS
(3)
POINTS
(3.50)
POINTS
(4)
POINTS
(5)
SUPPORT & DEV (15%)
POINTS
(0)
POINTS
(2)
POINTS
(3)
POINTS
(3.50)
0 / 5
0 / 5
Thesis, central idea, audience, purpose, digressions
Thesis or potential thesis is neither present in any portion of the essay, nor is it implied in
any manner. Thesis may be present but incorrect for the assignment’s
objectives/approach. Thesis may be present but the submission overall fails to meet most
assignment objectives (such as the essay is only a paragraph) that determining the thesis’
viability is problematic.
Lacks an identifiable thesis. Limited or no awareness of audience and purpose. Readers
cannot discern the essay’s central idea.
Thesis was attempted but unclear and/or inconsistently addressed. Reveals limited
awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea either lacking or inconsistently
addressed.
Thesis is identifiable, but perhaps too narrow, too broad, or otherwise problematic.
Awareness of audience may be adequate but inconsistent. Central idea is perhaps too
general and supported by irrelevant examples.
Thesis is established and is consistently addressed throughout most of the paper.
Awareness of audience is sufficient. Central idea is clear and maintained in most of the
essay.
Thesis is clearly established and maintained throughout the entire paper. Paper
demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of audience and purpose. Central idea/focus
maintained throughout.
0 / 5
Thesis support, thesis development, use of examples, logic, ...
Page 1 of 4 Midterm Project Assignment Select a .docx
This document provides instructions for a midterm project assignment. Students are asked to select a term related to cross-cultural education/counseling and conduct a literature search to answer questions about the term's definition and use. The assignment should be 2 pages maximum and follow APA formatting guidelines. It will be graded based on introduction, focus, ideas/support, conclusion, structure/organization, and other writing elements.
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but ...
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
Paper Grade Rubric
1. Significantly insufficient
(6 points)
2. Insufficient
(7 points)
3. Sufficient
(8 points)
4. Good
(9 points)
5. Excellent
(10 points)
Description of Event
Description of event significantly lacks details relevant to concept; only direct citations included or copying existing definitions.
Many relevant facts are missing or inaccurate; more research was needed. Included existing definition by others.
Most facts are relevant and presented accurately; some factual information is misleading or inaccurate; put into both students own words and existing definition.
Details not missing, and are adequate and relevant to the concept; defined using student’s own words.
Concept defined and described completely, put into students own words; other details are complete and fully relevant to the concept.
Interpretation of Event
No concept presented, used, or defined. Weak/no argument presented.
No module concept defined, partial argument; interpretation is inconsistent with concept.
Concept defined but no argument/weak support of argument; interpretation is partly consistent with concept
Concept correctly defined and well presented; argument is somewhat unclear; interpretation is mostly consistent with concept
Understanding of event is correct, and is expanded through exceptional use of concept
Evaluation of Event
No concept presented or use of concept does little or distracts from the understating of event; no evaluation presented
Concept presented but support is weak or lacking, no argument or weak support of argument
Concept presented, very weak argument
Concept defined and clearly presented, evaluation is inconsistent with concept or unclear.
Concept fully integrated into evaluation; understandings of event is expended through the concept
Organization and Grammar of Writing
Organization of paper is inconsistent and distracting from the thesis, significant grammatical errors and typos (more than 7).
Organization of paper only partly supportive of the thesis; substantial grammatical errors and typo (5 to 7), awkward language
Organization of paper somewhat inconsistent with thesis; some grammatical or spelling errors (around 4 to 2)
Organization of paper clear and content organized to support thesis; minor grammatical or spelling errors (fewer than 2)
Organization flawless and fully supports thesis; no grammatical errors nor typos.
Information Literacy
Fewer than five sources, sources are not diverse or not relevant; no or incomplete credibility assessment.; no reference page and in-text citations.
Weak diversity, relevance and credibility assessment of sources. Lacking citations, or wrong format of citations, incorrect citation style.
Adequate diversity and credibility assessment. Lacking some citations, inconsistent citation styles throughout the paper
Good diversity and credibility assessment of sources; minor citation errors.
Exceptional diversity of sources and credibility assessment; correct references and in-text citations.
· ...
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443
Case Study 3 Instructions: Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet
You will complete the “Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet” case in the Nkomo et al. text (#35 on pp. 112–113, 2011). You will write a 3–5-page essay (total does not include title page or reference page) that answers the 4 questions (1–4) on p. 113. Do not simply answer the questions. This is an essay and must be written to include an introduction, body, and conclusion. It may prove helpful to use the topic of the questions (advantages and disadvantages of internet recruitment and selection, the three approaches to online recruiting and selection, etc.) as section headers in your essay. Your response must be supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed resources. These resources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use other textbooks. The essay must be written in current APA format and include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations.
Note: This case study will not use the “small groups” described on p. 113 to answer the 4 questions.
Submit your assignment through SafeAssign as a draft to check for plagiarism before submitting it for points.
Data Analysis Plan
Details:
After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· Locate the data collection procedures you developed in Module 5 to use as reference material for this assignment.
· Locate the mission statement and program description from the existing organization that you referenced in Module 2 to use as examples for this assignment.
· Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Based on ...
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Topic : Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what physiological effects this could have. Provide an example of a patient in which you might check these labs, perform a test, given an injection etc. and how the results or your new knowledge would or could affect your plan of care?
The topic come from Chapter 24 of your text. You may use the textbook as one reference as well as the learning materials posted within the course. However, you must also locate a scholarly article related to your aging discussion question. Your question should be stated in your initial discussion post and answered based on pathophysiological principles and specifically those related to aging. Remember, you should focus on the pathophysiology of the content for your initial and peer replies as well as applying your knowledge to Advanced Practice Nursing.
RUBRIC:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides add ...
In this SLP, you will prepare a presentation in which you provide .docx
In this SLP, you will prepare a presentation in which you provide your audience with information on the following areas:
1. Introduce the immune system.
2. Explain the differences between antibody mediated immunity and cell mediated immunity.
3. List one example of antibody mediated and cell mediated immunity.
ASSIGNMENT EXPECTATIONS
Number of Slides: 15
Content of Slides: Your presentation should address each of the areas listed above.
Speaker Notes
Each slide will contain speaker notes sufficient to tell me what the purpose of each slide is—specifically, what you would say to a live audience that you were presenting your program to.
SLP: Second Part
Many healthcare programs have modified their operational design and culture to one of being patient-centered while being fiscally viable. As part of your interview of a healthcare manager or executive selected for module 1 discuss how the program was or will be transformed to be patient-centered. In your discussion please address the following questions.
1. How was the program restructured or reengineered to adapt to internal and external factors impacting it?
2. What internal and external factors were considered in the transformation?
3. What were the barriers or obstacles were encountered (e.g. internal politics, economics, resource limitations, time constraints, etc.).
4. What is the potential impact on the program of technology, legislation, etc on the services provided on the program.
*Please note that you may add any additional questions that tie into the themes presented in module 2.
Expectations
Assignment Expectations:
1. Be sure to conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to familiarize yourself with the facts of the case and be sure to justify/support your position.
2. Limit your responses to a maximum of three pages.
3. Please support your discussions with scholarly support (3-5 references). Be sure to properly cite all references.
4. Apply critical thinking skills the the assignment component.
5. I will grade your paper on your ability to address the assignment criteria listed above with depth and breadth of discussion. I will also critique your writing format (i.e. proper reference citations, spacing, etc.).
Your case paper will be further evaluated based on the following criteria:
Precision (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· Each question and or assignment requirement is addressed in the paper
· Accuracy of your answers, key points and supporting discussion
Clarity (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· The paper is well organized, concise, reads clearly, and it is not confusing.
Breadth (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· The paper presents appropriate breadth covering the assignment questions/requirements
Depth (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· Presents key points that lead to deeper matters and issues
· Integrates several points into coherent conclusions
Critical Thinking (Excellent; Good; Average; Poor)
· The paper demonstrates good under.
Faculty of Business and LawaCADEMIC YEAR 201819asse.docx
Faculty of Business and Law
aCADEMIC YEAR 2018/19
assessment brief
Module Code:
UMKD6R-15-3
Module Title:
Marketing Services
Submission Deadline:
Wednesday 13th March 2019
Assessment Component
Coursework
Assessment Weighting:
50 per cent of total module mark
Marking and feedback deadline (20 working days)
10th April 2019
Assessment Instructions
This is an individual case-based assignment that requires you to answer a question in relation to the case study below: ‘Woodchurch Furniture’.
Question: Using services marketing theory, analyse and explain Woodchurch’s loss of customersand recommendhow it might improve the customer experience. (100 marks)
General Guidance
· The coursework requires you to select and apply theories, frameworks, and concepts from the first six study units of the module.
· It is your decision as to what theories/frameworks/concepts to use to inform your answer. There is no recommended minimum or maximum number, but generally, quality of application is more important than the quantity of frameworks applied.
· Remember that the requirement is to apply rather than describe theory.
· You may use subheadings in your answer, but avoid excessive use of bullet points.
· Do not reiterate passages from the case study. Obviously, you will need to refer to the case, but do this as succinctly as you can.
· Evidence of relevant reading beyond the lecture slides, with appropriate application of this reading, will be rewarded. Besides textbooks, you may want to explore relevant articles from Journal of Services Marketing,Journal of Service Research, or Service Industries Journal. Other journals will haverelevant articles, but, as implied by their titles, these three focus on services.
· Include a title page, contents, and references. There is no need for an abstract or executive summary. Please number your pages.
Marking Criteria
Please see the grid below:
Criteria
Grading
Analysis (35%)
Recommendations (35%)
Structure (20%)
Literacy, presentation, referencing (10%)
80-100 PASS
Exceptional
Insightful analysis with originality of thought. Identifies underlying issue(s). Excellent application of theory. Demonstrates excellent integration of relevant literature from outside the module reading list.
Highly appropriate, with originality of thought. Consistent with issues raised in the analysis. Exceptional clarity and detail. Supported wherever possible by theory / literature.
Exceptional organization and flow of material with excellent connections between ideas. Introduction is specific and signposts. Conclusion synthesises and may highlight implications of recommendations.
Exceptional standard of literacy and presentation. Near faultless referencing.
70-79 PASS
Excellent
Insightful analysis. Identifies underlying issue(s). Excellent application of theory. Demonstrates excellent integration of relevant literature from outside the module reading list.
Excellent and appropriate, with some originality of thought. Consist.
The name of the company is South west airlinei chose action pla.docx
The name of the company is South west airline
i chose action plan and evaluative plan
Final Project: Final Paper, Presentation, and Peer Assessment
This assignment is a group project. Students will be placed into groups consisting of groups of four or five students each. Groups will be assigned early, and the expectation is that the groups will work on the various parts of the assignment as relevant material is covered throughout the course. The group will act as a self-directed team, and will therefore determine its own timetable, task list, guidelines for communication, goals, and so forth. As an individual, you are expected to participate fully in the project. Everyone in your group will receive the same grade for the project.
Your group will create a strategic plan and present the plan in a professional manner. The plan requires a paper turn in to the Assignment Folder and a PowerPoint presentation that is presented in the last week of class.
All students in the group will receive the same grade for the final paper and the presentation.
However, if a student fails to contribute to the project, the student will earn a zero for the assignment and/or PowerPoint presentation.
By completing this assignment, students will meet the outcome(s):
examine the impact of ethical decision making, social responsibility, stakeholder analysis, and corporate governance on organizations and society
formulate and evaluate an organization's vision and mission statement, and develop long-term objectives
analyze and synthesize strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) to generate, prioritize, and implement alternative strategies in order to write and present a strategic plan
evaluate the outcomes of selected strategies to determine their success and impact on the achievement of an organization's vision and mission
Required Elements to include in Applied Final Project:
The strategic plan should include:
Ø vision and mission
Ø background organization
Ø industry analysis
Ø competitive analysis
Ø financial analysis
Ø technique analysis (using one technique from chapter 6)
Ø alternative strategy generation
Ø SWOT analysis
Ø strategy and prioritization selection
Ø action plan
Ø evaluative plan
Identify strategies
Discuss strategies used at the corporate, business and function levels using the concepts learned in the course.
Demonstrate critical thinking in the assessment.
Required Formatting of Paper:
This report should be double spaced, 12-point font, 20 - 25 pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;
This paper should be written in the third person. No script should contain the words “I or we;”
Title page with your name, the course name, the date, and instructor’s name;
Include a reference page;
Use APA formatting for in-text citations and reference page. You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;
Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.
This entry should be a 500-750 word description of the topic. The as.docx
This entry should be a 500-750 word description of the topic. The assignment should present a description of the topic with a purpose statement. Review the pathophysiology of the disorder, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment plan per current guidelines. Review Healthy People 2020 and standard preventative guidelines regarding screening for STDs and research the possibility of drug-resistant strains within your state/region.
Topic is : Gonorrhea
Rubric:
Case Study Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Case Study Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsContent of Case StudyThe writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the case study subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The case study content and theories are well developed and linked to the course content, assignment requirements, and practical experience. The case study includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the assignment.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
30 points
The writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and the components of the case study are accurately represented with evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role content. Course materials and scholarly resources are present to support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the case study.
Cites two references.
26 points
The writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter, as evidenced by components of the case study and use of evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Cites only one reference.
23 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
Significant content of case study is vague, inaccurately portrayed, or missing.
No references cited.
Submits assignment late.
20 points30
Analysis and Synthesis of Case Study Content and MeaningThrough critical analysis, the submitted case study provides an accurate, clear, concise, and complete summary of the scenario.
Information from scholarly resources is synthesized, providing new information or insight related to the context of the assignment by providing both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints.
All instruction requirements noted.
30 points
Case study is complete, providing evidence of further synthesis of course content via .
Hbel 3203 teaching of grammar asgnmt qns
1. The document provides instructions for an assignment on teaching grammar for an education course. Students are asked to write a report analyzing their use of tenses in short essays and describing the grammar instruction methods used.
2. The assignment requires students to teach present and past tenses to others, have them write short essays, and analyze their ability to use tenses accurately. Students must justify their choice of explicit or implicit grammar instruction methods.
3. The report will be evaluated based on introduction, data collection method, analysis of instruction methods, analysis of tense use in essays, conclusion, and organization. Students must attach at least 5 essays for full marks.
10 25 Points.docx
This document provides instructions for a nursing assignment. It outlines the purpose, course outcomes, grading rubric, and requirements for the assignment. Students are asked to write a paper on a nursing topic based on evidence from a recent scholarly journal article. The paper must include an introduction, body, and conclusion section. It must be formatted according to APA style and cannot exceed two pages. Sources must be from nursing journals published within the last five years. The document provides detailed descriptions of the criteria and point values for each section of the paper.
Assignment 2 Audit Planning and ControlDue Week 8 and worth 280.docx
Assignment 2: Audit Planning and Control
Due Week 8 and worth 280 points
It is common industry knowledge that an audit plan provides the specific guidelines auditors must follow when conducting an external audit. External public accounting firms conduct external audits to ensure outside stakeholders that the company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) standards.
Use the Internet to select a public accounting company that appeals to you. Imagine that you are a senior partner in a public accounting firm hired to complete an audit for the chosen public company.
Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
1. Outline the critical steps inherent in planning an audit and designing an effective audit program. Based upon the type of company selected, provide specific details of the actions that the company should undertake during planning and designing the audit program.
1. Examine at least two (2) performance ratios that you would use in order to determine which analytical tests to perform. Identify the accounts that you would test, and select at least three (3) analytical procedures that you would use in your audit.
1. Analyze the balance sheet and income statement of the company that you have selected, and outline your method for evidence collection which should include, but not be limited to, the type of evidence to collect and the manner in which you would determine the sufficiency of the evidence.
1. Discuss the audit risk model, and ascertain which sampling or non-sampling techniques you would use in order to establish your preliminary judgment about materiality. Justify your response.
1. Assuming that the end result is an unqualified audit report, outline the primary responsibilities of the audit firm after it issues the report in question.
1. Use at least two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
1. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
1. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
1. Plan and design a generalized audit program.
1. Determine the nature and extent of evidence accumulated to conduct an audit after considering the unique circumstances of an engagement.
1. Evaluate a company’s various risk factors and the related impact to the audit process.
1. Evaluate effective internal controls that minimize audit risk and pote ...
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
Eng 101
e3 The “Summary + Response” ESSAY: Writing based on reading about language, culture & identity
The summary+response essay requires you to use and engage with other written materials - that is, ideas and quotations from other writers - in an essay.
Articles: Tan, "Mother Tongue" (127-132)
In your essay, you will (A) present the writer's ideas accurately and fairly, using your skills in summarizing, paraphrasing, and using quotations. And you will (B) present a thoughtful response, in which you take a stand on the major issue of the original.
You don't need additional information from the internet and you don't need to look for any more sources. If you do want to use another source, you need to clear it with your instructor.
Preliminary Steps
1. Read, re-read, annotate the article you chose.
2. Complete the "Responding to Writing" worksheet to help clarify and organize your thoughts on the issues.
3. Be able to summarize and paraphrase the material accurately.
A Possible Outline for Your Essay
Your essay might be organized something like this, in which each of the first-level bullets would be one or more ¶s:
• Open: Introduce the issues in a general way, possibly without mentioning the article/author yet.
• Introduce & briefly summarize the main article:
· Summarize the main, relevant ideas of the article and include important details. (Include the author's full name and title of the article.)
· Note that you will also refer to and summarize and quote from the article in the response section of the essay, so you don't need to provide a complete, detailed summary here.
• Respond:
· You will probably use some of the ideas you generated in the "Responding to Writing" worksheet.
· Discuss and offer some analysis of the issues raised in the article, and possibly comment on how the author has presented them, how convincing her/his evidence is, and so on.
· Present your own perspectives, thoughts, and perhaps feelings on the issues. You might describe your own life experiences or experiences of friends, as they relate to the issues in question.
· In this response section you need to be sure to explain your ideas clearly and support them (with logic, with illustrative examples, maybe with more quotes from the article).
· If you wish, you can bring in a couple of ideas/quotes from one or two of the additional articles to supplement or support your points.
· This section should be presented in logically organized, focused paragraphs.
• Close: Wrap up the essay in a meaningful and satisfying way.
Think it through!
Don't just grab onto the first thought that comes to you, an initial and superficial reaction. Consider your thoughts and feelings, think hard about the topic and what you have read about it, and form a coherent and thoughtful response.
In a thoughtful response, you don't need to solve or resolve the problem or the issue. You don't have to try to have the "last word" on the topic. Saying that it's troubling (or not) or an im ...
Similar to image7.pngimage8.png.docx (20)
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
This discussion will allow you to examine several different prev.docx
El Centro College Psychology Assessment of Critical Thinking Rub.docx
El Centro College Psychology Assessment of Critical Thinking Rub.docx
#35537 Topic Course Project Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Pra.docx
#35537 Topic Course Project Part 3—Translating Evidence Into Pra.docx
Motivational Interview PaperA. Introduction Overview of Motivat.docx
Motivational Interview PaperA. Introduction Overview of Motivat.docx
Motivational Interview PaperA. Introduction Overview of Motivat.docx
Motivational Interview PaperA. Introduction Overview of Motivat.docx
These are Statistic answers needed. If this is not your specialty, p.docx
These are Statistic answers needed. If this is not your specialty, p.docx
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
Argumentative Essayby mutiu OlokodanaSubmission date 28.docx
Page 1 of 4 Midterm Project Assignment Select a .docx
Page 1 of 4 Midterm Project Assignment Select a .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docx
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
Paper Grade Rubric1. Significantly insufficient(6 points).docx
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
Topic Explain why obesity is undesirable in the elderly and what
In this SLP, you will prepare a presentation in which you provide .docx
In this SLP, you will prepare a presentation in which you provide .docx
Faculty of Business and LawaCADEMIC YEAR 201819asse.docx
Faculty of Business and LawaCADEMIC YEAR 201819asse.docx
The name of the company is South west airlinei chose action pla.docx
The name of the company is South west airlinei chose action pla.docx
This entry should be a 500-750 word description of the topic. The as.docx
This entry should be a 500-750 word description of the topic. The as.docx
Assignment 2 Audit Planning and ControlDue Week 8 and worth 280.docx
Assignment 2 Audit Planning and ControlDue Week 8 and worth 280.docx
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
Eng 101 e3 The Summary + Response” ESSAY Writing based on read.docx
More from sleeperharwell
For this assignment, review the articleAbomhara, M., & Koie.docx
For this assignment, review the article:
Abomhara, M., & Koien, G.M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks.
Journal of Cyber Security, 4
, 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.414
and evaluate it in 3 pages (800 words), in APA format with in-text citation using your own words, by addressing the following:
What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they do so?
Identify the hypothesis or question being tested
Summarize the overall article.
Identify the conclusions of the authors
Indicate whether or not you think the data support their conclusions/hypothesis
Consider alternative explanations for the results
Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches to testing their hypothesis (logical follow-up studies to build on, confirm or refute the conclusions)
The relevance or importance of the study
The appropriateness of the experimental design
When you write your evaluation, be brief and concise, this is not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) you turn in your evaluation. This is good practice for your literature review, which you’ll be completing during the dissertation process.
.
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus N.docx
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus National Security
. This is a particularly "hot topic" because of recent actions by the federal government taken against Apple. So, please use information from reliable sources to support your perspective.
This assignment should be 1.5 pages in length, using Times New Roman font (size 12), double spaced on a Word documen
.
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy vers.docx
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus National Security
. This is a particularly "hot topic" because of recent actions by the federal government taken against Apple. So, please use information from reliable sources to support your perspective.
This assignment should be 1.5 pages in length, using Times New Roman font (size 12), double spaced on a Word document.
.
For this Assignment, read the case study for Claudia and find two to.docx
For this Assignment, read the case study for Claudia and find two to three scholarly articles on social issues surrounding immigrant families.
In a 2- to 4-page paper, explain how the literature informs you about Claudia and her family when assessing her situation.
Describe two social issues related to the course-specific case study for Claudia that inform a culturally competent social worker.
Describe culturally competent strategies you might use to assess the needs of children.
Describe the types of data you would collect from Claudia and her family in order to best serve them.
Identify other resources that may offer you further information about Claudia’s case.
Create an eco-map to represent Claudia’s situation. Describe how the ecological perspective of assessment influenced how the social worker interacted with Claudia.
Describe how the social worker in the case used a strengths perspective and multiple tools in her assessment of Claudia. Explain how those factors contributed to the therapeutic relationship with Claudia and her family.
.
For this assignment, please start by doing research regarding the se.docx
For this assignment, please start by doing research regarding the severity of prejudicial aggression/violence from the past. After you do this, research the severity of prejudicial aggression/violence that has gone on in the past decade. Target the same specific groups that have been the aggressor and victim in both your historical group and your present-day group. For instance, if you choose "black vs. white" in the 1950s, you must use the same group for your present-day group. Once you do this, discuss various ways that it is the same, as well as why it is different between the time periods. What influences have changed? Why is it better now, or worse now than in the past? Please discuss how the advancements in media (news, entertainment, and social media) have had on this issue, along with whatever you come up with outside of media influence. Make sure you back your information up with citations from your sources.
.
For this assignment, please discuss the following questionsWh.docx
For this assignment, please discuss the following questions?
What was the name of the first computer network?
Who created this network
When did this network got established?
Explain one of the major disadvantages of this network at its initial stage
What is TCP?
Who created TCP?
What is IP?
When did it got implemented
How did the implementation of TCP/IP revolutionize communication technology?
Requirements:
You must write a minimum of two paragraphs, with two different citations, and every paragraph should have at least four complete sentences for each question. Every question should have a subtitle (Bold and Centered). You must also respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts with at least 100 words each before the due date. You need to use the discussion board header provided in the getting started folder. Please proofread your work before posting your assignment.
.
For this assignment, locate a news article about an organization.docx
For this assignment, locate a news article about an organization who experienced an ethical issue related to communication. In 1,200 to 1,550 words, complete the following:
Discuss the circumstances of the incident, the organization’s decision making process, and the public and media reaction to the organization’s decision.
Presume you have been hired by that organization to help strengthen their communication efforts. Outline at least
four strategies
you would recommend the organization follow in the future to enhance the ethics of their communication.
.
For this assignment, it requires you Identifies the historic conte.docx
For this assignment, it requires you Identifies the historic context of ideas and cultural traditions outside the U.S., and how they have influenced American culture.
Topic for this paper:
The history of ramen (technically started in China, moved and developed in Japan) now a pop culture cuisine in the U.S.
The paper should be in APA format and two full pages with double-spaced. Also, since you are researching and writing about new information, be sure cite your source (website name, address, date you visited it) at the end of the two pages, so I know where you got your information.
.
For this assignment, create a framework from which an international .docx
For this assignment, create a framework from which an international human resource management function can address cultural challenges. Within your framework, devise a model that includes due diligence steps, merger steps, and post-merger steps that specifically address cultural acclimation and environmental acclimation, as well as bringing two workforces together.
Supported by a minimum of two academic sources.
.
For this assignment, create a 15-20 slide digital presentation in tw.docx
For this assignment, create a 15-20 slide digital presentation in two parts to educate your colleagues about meeting the needs of specific ELLs and making connections between school and family.
Part 1
In the first part of your presentation, provide your colleagues with useful information about unique factors that affect language acquisition among LTELs, RAELs, and SIFEs.
This part of the presentation should include:
A description of the characteristics of LTELs, RAELs, and SIFEs
An explanation of the cultural, sociocultural, psychological, or political factors that affect the language acquisition of LTELs, RAELs, and SIFEs
A discussion of factors that affect the language acquisition of refugee, migrant, immigrant and Native American ELLs and how each of these ELLs may relate to LTELs, RAEL, or SIFEs
A discussion of additional factors that affect the language acquisition of grades K-12 LTELs, RAEL, and SIFEs
Part 2
In the second part of the presentation, recommend culturally inclusive practices within curriculum and instruction. Provide useful resources that would empower the family members of ELLs.
This part of the presentation should include:
Examples of curriculum and materials, including technology, that promote a culturally inclusive classroom environment.
Examples of strategies that support culturally inclusive practices.
A brief description of how home and school partnerships facilitate learning.
At least two resources for families of ELLs that would empower them to become partners in their child’s academic achievement.
Presenter’s notes, title, and reference slides that contain 3-5 scholarly resources.
.
For this assignment, you are to complete aclinical case - narrat.docx
For this assignment, you are to complete a
clinical case - narrated PowerPoint report
that will follow the SOAP note example provided below. The case report will be based on the clinical case scenario list below.
You are to approach this clinical scenario as if it is a real patient in the clinical setting.
Instructions:
Step 1
- Read the assigned clinical scenario and using your clinical reasoning skills, decide on the diagnoses. This step informs your next steps.
Step 2
- Document the given information in the case scenario under the appropriate sections, headings, and subheadings of the SOAP note.
Step 3
- Document all the classic symptoms typically associated with the diagnoses in Step 1. This information may NOT be given in the scenario; you are to obtain this information from your textbooks. Include APA citations.
Example of Steps 1 - 3:
You decided on Angina after reading the clinical case scenario (Step 1)
Review of Symptoms (list of classic symptoms):
CV: sweating, squeezing, pressure, heaviness, tightening, burning across the chest starting behind the breastbone
GI: indigestion, heartburn, nausea, cramping
Pain: pain to the neck, jaw, arms, shoulders, throat, back, and teeth
Resp: shortness of breath
Musculo: weakness
Step 4
– Document the abnormal physical exam findings typically associated with the acute and chronic diagnoses decided on in Step 1. Again, this information may NOT be given. Cull this information from the textbooks. Include APA citations.
Example of Step 4:
You determined the patient has Angina in Step 1
Physical Examination (list of classic exam findings):
CV: RRR, murmur grade 1/4
Resp: diminished breath sounds left lower lobe
Step 5
- Document the diagnoses in the appropriate sections, including the ICD-10 codes, from Step 1. Include three differential diagnoses. Define each diagnosis and support each differential diagnosis with pertinent positives and negatives and what makes these choices plausible. This information may come from your textbooks. Remember to cite using APA.
Step 6
- Develop a treatment plan for the diagnoses.
Only
use National Clinical Guidelines to develop your treatment plans. This information will not come from your textbooks. Use your research skills to locate appropriate guidelines. The treatment plan
must
address the following:
a) Medications (include the dosage in mg/kg, frequency, route, and the number of days)
b) Laboratory tests ordered (include why ordered and what the results of the test may indicate)
c) Diagnostic tests ordered (include why ordered and what the results of the test may indicate)
d) Vaccines administered this visit & vaccine administration forms given,
e) Non-pharmacological treatments
f) Patient/Family education including preventive care
g) Anticipatory guidance for the visit (be sure to include exactly what you discussed during the visit; review Bright Futures website for this section)
h) Follow-up appointment with a.
For this assignment, you are to complete aclinical case - narr.docx
For this assignment, you are to complete a
clinical case - narrated PowerPoint report
that will follow the SOAP note example provided below. The case report will be based on the clinical case scenario list below.
You are to approach this clinical scenario as if it is a real patient in the clinical setting.
Instructions:
Step 1
- Read the assigned clinical scenario and using your clinical reasoning skills, decide on the diagnoses. This step informs your next steps.
Step 2
- Document the given information in the case scenario under the appropriate sections, headings, and subheadings of the SOAP note.
Step 3
- Document all the classic symptoms typically associated with the diagnoses in Step 1. This information may NOT be given in the scenario; you are to obtain this information from your textbooks. Include APA citations.
Example of Steps 1 - 3:
You decided on Angina after reading the clinical case scenario (Step 1)
Review of Symptoms (list of classic symptoms):
CV: sweating, squeezing, pressure, heaviness, tightening, burning across the chest starting behind the breastbone
GI: indigestion, heartburn, nausea, cramping
Pain: pain to the neck, jaw, arms, shoulders, throat, back, and teeth
Resp: shortness of breath
Musculo: weakness
Step 4
– Document the abnormal physical exam findings typically associated with the acute and chronic diagnoses decided on in Step 1. Again, this information may NOT be given. Cull this information from the textbooks. Include APA citations.
Example of Step 4:
You determined the patient has Angina in Step 1
Physical Examination (list of classic exam findings):
CV: RRR, murmur grade 1/4
Resp: diminished breath sounds left lower lobe
Step 5
- Document the diagnoses in the appropriate sections, including the ICD-10 codes, from Step 1. Include three differential diagnoses. Define each diagnosis and support each differential diagnosis with pertinent positives and negatives and what makes these choices plausible. This information may come from your textbooks. Remember to cite using APA.
Step 6
- Develop a treatment plan for the diagnoses.
Only
use National Clinical Guidelines to develop your treatment plans. This information will not come from your textbooks. Use your research skills to locate appropriate guidelines. The treatment plan
must
address the following:
a) Medications (include the dosage in mg/kg, frequency, route, and the number of days)
b) Laboratory tests ordered (include why ordered and what the results of the test may indicate)
c) Diagnostic tests ordered (include why ordered and what the results of the test may indicate)
d) Vaccines administered this visit & vaccine administration forms given,
e) Non-pharmacological treatments
f) Patient/Family education including preventive care
g) Anticipatory guidance for the visit (be sure to include exactly what you discussed during the visit; review Bright Futures website for this section)
h) Follow-up appointment wit.
For this assignment, you are provided with four video case studies (.docx
For this assignment, you are provided with four video case studies (linked in the Resources). Review the cases of Julio and Kimi, and choose either Reese or Daneer for the third case. Review these two videos: •The Case of Julio: Julio is a 36-year-old single gay male. He is of Cuban descent. He was born and raised in Florida by his parents with his two sisters. He attended community college but did not follow through with his plan to obtain a four-year degree, because his poor test taking skills created barriers. He currently works for a sales promotion company, where he is tasked with creating ads for local businesses. He enjoys the more social aspects of his job, but tracking the details is challenging and has caused him to lose jobs in the past. He has been dating his partner, Justin, for five years. Justin feels it is time for them to commit and build a future. Justin is frustrated that Julio refuses to plan the wedding and tends to blame Julio’s family. While Julio’s parents hold some traditional religious values, they would welcome Justin into the family but are respectfully waiting for Julio to make his plans known. Justin is as overwhelmed by the details at home as he is at work. •The Case of Kimi: Kimi is a 48-year-old female currently separated from her husband, Robert, of 16 years. They have no children, which was consistent with Kimi’s desire to focus on her career as a sales manager. She told Robert a pregnancy would wreck her efforts to maintain her body. His desire to have a family was a goal he decided he needed to pursue with someone else. He left Kimi six months ago for a much younger woman and filed for divorce. Kimi began having issues with food during high school when she was on the dance team and felt self-conscious wearing the form-fitting uniform. During college, she sought treatment because her roommate became alarmed by her issues around eating. She never told her parents about this and felt it was behind her. Her parents are Danish and value privacy. They always expected Kimi to be independent. Her lack of communication about her private life did not concern them. They are troubled by Robert’s behavior and consider his conspicuous infidelity as a poor reflection upon their family. Kimi has moved in with her parents while she and Robert are selling the house, which has upended the balance in their relationship. For a third case, choose one of these videos: •The Case of Reese: -Reese is a 44-year-old married African American female. Her parents live in another state, and she is their only child. Her father is a retired Marine Lieutenant Colonel who was stationed both in the United States and overseas while Reese was growing up. She entered the Air Force as soon as she graduated high school at age 17 and has achieved the rank of Chief Master Sergeant. She has been married 15 years to John, and they recently discovered she is pregnant. The unexpected pregnancy has been quite disorienting for someone who has planned.
For this assignment, you are going to tell a story, but not just.docx
For this assignment, you are going to tell a story, but not just any story. It will be a First Nations story, and it will be your version of it.
Choose one of the two stories at the end of this unit, either "Why the Flint-Rock Cannot Fight Back"
You can write of yourself telling one of the stories.
In telling your story, here is what you will need to consider:
Clarity of speech
Intonation
Pacing and pauses
You will also have to work out how to make this telling of the story yours. You might want to read it aloud with point form notes for a prompt or to memorize it. Perhaps you want to rewrite it so that it sounds more like your words. Maybe you will change names and place-names to those you are familiar with. If you are making a video or performing this live, you should practice facial and hand gestures as well as stance and body language. The purpose of all of this is to bring your own meaning to the story.
HERE IS THE STORY
Why the Flint-Rock Cannot Fight Back
Sto-Way’-Na—Flint—was rich and powerful. His lodge was toward the sunrise. It was guarded by Squr-hein— Crane. He was the watcher. He watched from the top of a lone tree. When anybody approached, Crane would call out and warn Flint, and Flint would come out of his lodge and meet the visitor.
There was an open flat in front of the lodge. Flint met all his visitors there. Warriors and hunters came and bought flint for arrow-points and spear-heads. They paid Flint big prices for the privilege of chipping off the hard stone. Some who needed flint for their weapons were poor and could not buy. These poor persons Flint turned away.
Coyote heard about Flint and, as he wanted some arrow-points, he asked his squas-tenk’ to help him. Squas-tenk’ refused.
“Hurry, do what I ask, or I will throw you away and let the rain wash you— wash you cold,” said Coyote, and then the power gave him three rocks that were harder than the flint-rock. It also gave him a little dog that had only one ear. But this ear was sharp, like a knife; it was a knife- ear.
Then to his wife, Mole, Coyote said: “Go and make your underground trails in the flat where Sto-way’-na lives. When you have finished and see me talking with him, show yourself so we can see you.”
Then Coyote set out for Flint’s lodge. As he got near it, he had his power make a fog to cover the land, and thick fog spread over everything. Crane, the watcher, up in the lone tree, could not see Coyote. He did not know that Coyote was around.
Coyote climbed the tree and took Crane from his high perch and broke his neck. Crane had no time to cry out. Then Coyote went on to Flint’s lodge. He was almost there when Flint’s dog, Grizzly Bear, jumped out of the lodge and ran toward him.
Coyote was not scared, and he yelled at Flint: “Stop your grizzly bear dog! Stop him, or my dog will kill him.”
That amused Flint, who was looking through the doorway. He saw that Coyote’s one-eared dog was very small, hardly a mouthful for Grizzly Bear. Fli.
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. Af.docx
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. After you finish the reading assignment, reflect on the concepts and write about it. What do you understand completely? What did not quite make sense? The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to reflect on the material you finished reading and to expand upon those thoughts
A Reflection Paper is an opportunity for you to express your thoughts about the material by writing about them.
The writing you submit must meet the following requirements:
be at least two pages;
include your thoughts about the main topics
APA Stlye
.
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. .docx
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. After you finish the reading assignment, reflect on the concepts and write about it. What do you understand completely? What did not quite make sense? The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to reflect on the material you finished reading and to expand upon those thoughts. If you are unclear about a concept, either read it again, or ask your professor. Can you apply the concepts toward your career? How?
This is not a summary. A Reflection Paper is an opportunity for you to express your thoughts about the material by writing about them.
The writing you submit must meet the following requirements:
be at least two pages;
include your thoughts about the main topics; and
include financial performance, quality performance, and personnel performance.
Format the Reflection Paper in your own words using APA style, and include citations and references as needed to avoid instances of plagiarism.
The reading assignment that you are to reflect on is Chapter 11, in the text. My written lecture for this Unit is basically a reflection on Chapter 11. Find an interesting part or two of the chapter and tell me what you got out of it. It's not a hard assignment. If you read my lecture, you will see the part of Chapter 11 that intrigued me the most was the subject of codetermination on page 367. Anything that intrigues you in Chapter 11 is fine with me.
Written Lecture
Does the ringisei decision-making process by consensus, which is used by the Japanese, reach the same conclusion as the top-down methods, which are used by American management? Some might label the Japanese decision-making system as simply procrastination. Others appreciate the method and expect productive outcomes. One major challenge is to build an organizational culture to adopt the practice of ringisei. If only half of an organization uses ringisei, it is likely to cause miscommunication and result in frustration.
The ringisei is based on the theory that the employee is an important part of the overall success of an enterprise. It is common to hear a lot about
empowering the employees
. Is creativity and innovation rewarded, ignored, or punished for the lower level employee in America?
Could the Japanese system of decision making have led to the controversy of what Toyota knew about unintended acceleration problems? This may be the best example of the use of silence in the Japanese culture frustrating Americans as a nation. This is not an explicit accusation of Toyota or of Japanese culture. Rather, it is inserted here to demonstrate potential consequences of management methods, processes, systems, and decision making. Read pages 106-108 of Luthans and Doh (2012) concerning this topic. The cause of the unintended acceleration problem announced by the United States government was due to bad floor mats or driver error. Initially, electronic problems were not mentioned.
The March 2011 Fuku.
For this assignment, you are asked to conduct some Internet research.docx
This document instructs students to research a malware, virus, or DOS attack by summarizing findings from an internet source in 3-4 paragraphs. The summary should include the name of the malware/virus, date of incident, impact/damage caused, how it was detected, and a reference citation.
For this assignment, you are a professor teaching a graduate-level p.docx
For this assignment, you are a professor teaching a graduate-level public administration administrative law course at a traditional state university. Your task is to develop a formal presentation providing an overview of administrative law—specifically by comparing and contrasting the key defining aspects of administrative law within the American three-branch federal government structure, explaining how these functions are overseen/regulated, and ultimately, interpreting how they serve the common good of the public-at-large.
Your presentation must include the following with specific examples:
Articulate an understanding of how federal agencies enforce their regulations.
Explain the fundamental role that agency rulemaking plays in regulating society-at-large.
Compare both formal rulemaking and informal rulemaking.
Articulate the similarities and differences between rulemaking and adjudication.
Analyze the various methods of oversight exercised by the judicial, legislative, and executive branches of the federal government over administrative agencies.
Articulate how special interest groups (to include the media) can influence and/or shape public opinion about administrative agencies and place a spotlight on individual policies.
Incorporate appropriate animations, transitions, and graphics as well as speaker notes for each slide. The speaker notes may be comprised of brief paragraphs or bulleted lists and should cite material appropriately. Add audio to each slide using the
Media
section of the
Insert
tab in the top menu bar for each slide.
Support your presentation with at least seven scholarly resources
.
In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources may be included.
Length: 15 slides (with a separate reference slide)
Notes Length: 200-350 words for
each slide
Be sure to include citations for quotations and paraphrases with references in APA format and style where appropriate.
.
For this assignment, we will be visiting the PBS website,Race .docx
For this assignment, we will be visiting the PBS website,
Race: The Power of Illusion
. Click on the "Learn More" link, and proceed to visit these links:
What is Race? (View All)
Sorting People (Complete both "Begin Sorting" and "Explore Traits")
Race Timeline (View All)
Human Diversity (Complete both the Quiz and "Explore Diversity")
Me, My Race & I (View Slideshow Menu)
Where Race Lives (View All)
Given the
enormous
amount of information presented in this website, discuss what was most interesting and surprising to you in
EAC
H of the links.
Post your 200 word assignment.
Discussion Board Activity:
Now that you have learned that the race is a social concept rather than a biological truth respond to TWO fellow students with your thoughts on prejudice and discrimination pertaining to deviance, social class, and race.
(I'll send you two replies)
Due November 3rd
.
For this assignment, the student starts the project by identifying a.docx
For this assignment, the student starts the project by identifying a clinical population of interest. Then, the student is to locate (10) nursing research articles from peer-reviewed nursing journals that reflect the clinical population of their interest. From the articles, the student identifies what has been researched and is currently known about their clinical population. The student is to write a summary of each article in a tabular format and submit a single summary table of all articles that provides a review of current knowledge on the selected population ( example and form will be provided ).
.
More from sleeperharwell (20)
For this assignment, review the articleAbomhara, M., & Koie.docx
For this assignment, review the articleAbomhara, M., & Koie.docx
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus N.docx
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy versus N.docx
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy vers.docx
For this assignment, provide your perspective about Privacy vers.docx
For this Assignment, read the case study for Claudia and find two to.docx
For this Assignment, read the case study for Claudia and find two to.docx
For this assignment, please start by doing research regarding the se.docx
For this assignment, please start by doing research regarding the se.docx
For this assignment, please discuss the following questionsWh.docx
For this assignment, please discuss the following questionsWh.docx
For this assignment, locate a news article about an organization.docx
For this assignment, locate a news article about an organization.docx
For this assignment, it requires you Identifies the historic conte.docx
For this assignment, it requires you Identifies the historic conte.docx
For this assignment, create a framework from which an international .docx
For this assignment, create a framework from which an international .docx
For this assignment, create a 15-20 slide digital presentation in tw.docx
For this assignment, create a 15-20 slide digital presentation in tw.docx
For this assignment, you are to complete aclinical case - narrat.docx
For this assignment, you are to complete aclinical case - narrat.docx
For this assignment, you are to complete aclinical case - narr.docx
For this assignment, you are to complete aclinical case - narr.docx
For this assignment, you are provided with four video case studies (.docx
For this assignment, you are provided with four video case studies (.docx
For this assignment, you are going to tell a story, but not just.docx
For this assignment, you are going to tell a story, but not just.docx
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. Af.docx
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. Af.docx
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. .docx
For this assignment, you are asked to prepare a Reflection Paper. .docx
For this assignment, you are asked to conduct some Internet research.docx
For this assignment, you are asked to conduct some Internet research.docx
For this assignment, you are a professor teaching a graduate-level p.docx
For this assignment, you are a professor teaching a graduate-level p.docx
For this assignment, we will be visiting the PBS website,Race .docx
For this assignment, we will be visiting the PBS website,Race .docx
For this assignment, the student starts the project by identifying a.docx
For this assignment, the student starts the project by identifying a.docx
Recently uploaded
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Covered community pharmacy topic of the subject Social and preventive pharmacy for Diploma and Bachelor of pharmacy
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS Template 2023-2024 by: Irene S. Rueco
Hindi varnamala | hindi alphabet PPT.pdf
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
DRUGS AND ITS classification slide share
Any substance (other than food) that is used to prevent, diagnose, treat, or relieve symptoms of a
disease or abnormal condition
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Aberdeen
PCOS corelations and management through Ayurveda.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.Advanced Java[Extra Concepts, Not Difficult].docx
This is part 2 of my Java Learning Journey. This contains Hashing, ArrayList, LinkedList, Date and Time Classes, Calendar Class and more.
Recently uploaded (20)
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
Community pharmacy- Social and preventive pharmacy UNIT 5
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
What is Digital Literacy? A guest blog from Andy McLaughlin, University of Ab...
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
image7.pngimage8.png.docx
- 1. image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png Each 1-2-page reflection assignment will comprise of 75 points
- 2. toward your grade, for a total of 300 points. You will be given the prompts for each reflection assignment on the week they are assigned. You will need to relate your reflection to the course material for the given week the assignment is in. Be sure to use specific details and cite your textbook and/or external sources. This writing assignment should include four major sections: the Title Page, Abstract, Main Body, and References (please see Purdue University's APA Style GuideLinks to an external site. for more information). Review the assignment rubric available on the assignment's page. For this assignment, please consider the following: How do you plan to use your eyes more intentionally in sending and receiving clear messages from your friends and family members? Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 Reflection Assignment Rubric 75 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 30 pts Excellent The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. 24 pts Good
- 3. The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. 13.5 pts Acceptable The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). 0 pts Unacceptable The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning 30 pts Excellent The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications.
- 4. 24 pts Good The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications. 13.5 pts Acceptable The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications. 0 pts Unacceptable The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem. 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting, Grammar and Mechanics 15 pts Excellent The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. (4) complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar, (5) follows correct formatting style, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. 10.5 pts Good The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of
- 5. terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization (4) complete sentences, few spelling errors and grammar mistakes, (5) follows correct formatting style with minimal mistakes, (6) falls between the minimum and maximum page requirement. 7.5 pts Acceptable The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. (4) incomplete sentences, has spelling errors and uses acceptable grammar, (5) barely follows correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. 4.5 pts Unacceptable The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. (4) no sentence structure, many spelling errors and unacceptable grammar, (5) does not follow correct formatting style, (6) does not fall between the minimum and maximum page requirement. 15 pts Total Points: 75 Thomas The root cause can be found by conducting a study using time as the main metric as well as reason codes that would be recorded in an excel spreadsheet. Every patient that enters the emergency department will be added to the excel spreadsheet with the time they checked in and were seen by a provider. There will also be
- 6. a section with predefined reason codes that indicates the reason why they are waiting. A dashboard would then be generated to show the average amount of time each reason would make a patient wait. To go along with this, interviews or surveys would be conducted with the staff to see what they say about the reasons behind wait times. The predefined reason codes are as follows: 1. No Available Beds 2. Bed/Room Must Be Prepped 3. Patient Triage 4. Awaiting Patient Discharge or Transfer 5. Seen immediately The reported info that should be studied stands as the reason codes with their corresponding wait times and frequency. After studying this data, further studies must be conducted to investigate the causes for each.