International Digital Curation Conference (IDCC) 2016 paper/presentation about plans to merge the DMPTool and DMPonline to create a global DMP infrastructure, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 24 Feb 2016
International DMP workshop presentation, IDCC, Feb 2016Stephanie Simms
IDCC 2016 International Data Management Planning workshop presentation on the Smithsonian use case for the DMPTool, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 25 Feb 2016
International DMP workshop presentation, IDCC, Feb 2016Stephanie Simms
IDCC 2016 International Data Management Planning workshop presentation on the Smithsonian use case for the DMPTool, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 25 Feb 2016
Researchers require infrastructures that ensure a maximum of accessibility, stability and reliability to facilitate working with and sharing of research data. Such infrastructures are being increasingly summarised under the term Research Data Repositories (RDR). The project re3data.org – Registry of Research Data Repositories – began to index research data repositories in 2012 and offers researchers, funding organisations, libraries and publishers an overview of the heterogeneous research data repository landscape. In December 2014 re3data.org listed more than 1,030 research data repositories, which are described in detail using the re3data.org schema (http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/re3.003). Information icons help researchers to identify easily an adequate repository for the storage and reuse of their data. This talk describes the heterogeneous RDR landscape and presents a typology of institutional, disciplinary, multidisciplinary and project-specific RDR. Further, it outlines the features of re3data. org and it shows current developments for integration into data management planning tools and other services.
By the end of 2015 re3data.org and Databib (Purdue University, USA) will merge their services, which will then be managed under the auspices of DataCite. The aim of this merger is to reduce duplication of effort and to serve the research community better with a single, sustainable registry of research data repositories. The talk will present this organisational development as a best practice example for the development of international research information services.
Introduction to SUNCAT
Background to the redevelopment of the service
Key enhancements of the new interface
Contributing to SUNCAT
How SUNCAT can help you and your users
Demo of the new service
Future plans
Feedback and questions
Presented by Zena Mulligan at the Interlend 2014 Conference, 23-24 June 2014, Carlton Highland Hotel,
Edinburgh.
Initially prepared for the CERN/RDA workshop on Active Data Management Plans (28-30 June 2016). Also presented in Denver at International Data Week (12-17 Sept 2016).
Researchers require infrastructures that ensure a maximum of accessibility, stability and reliability to facilitate working with and sharing of research data. Such infrastructures are being increasingly summarised under the term Research Data Repositories (RDR). The project re3data.org – Registry of Research Data Repositories – began to index research data repositories in 2012 and offers researchers, funding organisations, libraries and publishers an overview of the heterogeneous research data repository landscape. In December 2014 re3data.org listed more than 1,030 research data repositories, which are described in detail using the re3data.org schema (http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/re3.003). Information icons help researchers to identify easily an adequate repository for the storage and reuse of their data. This talk describes the heterogeneous RDR landscape and presents a typology of institutional, disciplinary, multidisciplinary and project-specific RDR. Further, it outlines the features of re3data. org and it shows current developments for integration into data management planning tools and other services.
By the end of 2015 re3data.org and Databib (Purdue University, USA) will merge their services, which will then be managed under the auspices of DataCite. The aim of this merger is to reduce duplication of effort and to serve the research community better with a single, sustainable registry of research data repositories. The talk will present this organisational development as a best practice example for the development of international research information services.
Introduction to SUNCAT
Background to the redevelopment of the service
Key enhancements of the new interface
Contributing to SUNCAT
How SUNCAT can help you and your users
Demo of the new service
Future plans
Feedback and questions
Presented by Zena Mulligan at the Interlend 2014 Conference, 23-24 June 2014, Carlton Highland Hotel,
Edinburgh.
Initially prepared for the CERN/RDA workshop on Active Data Management Plans (28-30 June 2016). Also presented in Denver at International Data Week (12-17 Sept 2016).
This slideshow was used in an Introduction to Research Data Management course taught for the Mathematical, Physical and Life Sciences Division, University of Oxford, on 2014-02-26. It provides an overview of some key issues, looking at both day-to-day data management, and longer term issues, including sharing, and curation.
Results of a survey conducted by the Manitoba Library Associations Working Group, March 2012. Prepared for the Manitoba Libraries Conference, May 16, 2012.
Data “publication” attempts to appropriate for data the prestige of publication in the scholarly literature. While the scholarly communication community substantially endorses the idea, it hasn’t fully resolved what a data publication should look like or how data peer review should work. To contribute an important and neglected perspective on these issues, we surveyed ~250 researchers across the sciences and social sciences, asking what expectations “data publication” raises and what features would be useful to evaluate the trustworthiness and impact of a data publication and the contribution of its creator(s).
This webinar is intended for librarians, staff, and information professionals interested in improving usability for the DMPTool in their institution. This webinar will also help institutions begin to formalize which individuals or resources will be available to help researchers using the tool. This webinar will be most useful for users that need to customize the tool for their institution.
EZID makes it simple for researchers and others to obtain and manage long-term identifiers for their digital content. The service can create and resolve identifiers, and it also allows entry and maintenance of information about the identifier (metadata). This presentation was given as part of a webinar series.
DMPTool Webinar Series 1: Introduction to DMPTool Carly Strasser
Slides from DMPTool Webinar Series 1: Introduction to DMPTool, given 28 May 2013. Recording available at http://www.cdlib.org/services/uc3/uc3webinars.html
Software development should build on the successful work of others. The DMPTool helps researchers with data management planning, but what about other phases of the data life cycle? In this webinar, we will discuss what software integration with the DMPTool might look like, and why it is important. Topics include:
1. Background: why tools integration is important; why we are talking about this in terms of the DMPTool.
2. Details and plans for DMPTool2 regarding software integration and compatibility.
3. Future possibilities for software integration for DMPTool2
4. Example of successful integration of tools: work at the Center for Open Science.
Research Data Management Programme in EdinburghDCC-info
Presentation by Stuart Macdonald at DCC-Arkivum event 'Data Storage & Preservation Strategies for Research Data Management' at University of Edinburgh 27 October 2014
Presentació a càrrec de Mireia Alcalá, tècnica de Recursos d'Informació al CSUC, duta a terme al workshop en línia "Research Data Management & Open Science" organitzat per l'IDIBELL el 2 de novembre de 2020.
OpenAIRE-COAR conference 2014: Aligning Repository Networks - RED CLARA/LaRef...OpenAIRE
Presentation at the OpenAIRE-COAR Conference: "Open Access Movement to Reality: Putting the Pieces Together", Athens - May 21-22, 2014.
Session 1: Aligning Repository Networks.
RED CLARA/LaReferencia, by Carmen Gloria Labbe, Deputy General Manager of RedCLARA.
A brief overview of the development and current workflows for Research Data Management at Imperial College London, presented to colleagues at the University of Copenhagen and Roskilde University in Denmark.
Keynote : Beyond DM2E: towards sustainable digital services for humanities research communities in Europe? (Sally Chambers – DARIAH-EU, Göttingen Centre for Digital Humanities) at Enabling humanities research in the Linked Open Web – DM2E final event (11 December 2014, Navacchio, Italy)
Sarah Jones - National approaches to data managementdri_ireland
From "A National Approach to Open Research Data in Ireland", a workshop held on 8 September 2017 in National Library of Ireland, organised by The National Library of Ireland, the Digital Repository of Ireland, the Research Data Alliance and Open Research Ireland.
Presentation given as part of the 2018 OpenAIRE-FOSTER Open Access week webinar series. The tutorial is aimed at librarians and data support staff who are assisting researchers with Data Management Plans (DMPs). It reflects on recent trends and developments that will help in service delivery, including changing policies for DMPs, how funders review DMPs, new tools and international activities to make DMPs Open, machine-actionable and FAIR.
PARTHENOS Community Involvement and RequirementsParthenos
Presentation by Sebastian Drude for the PARTHENOS workshop "Introducing PARTHENOS - Integrating the Digital Humanities" on 14 December 2016 in Prato, Italy.
UC Davis National Center for Sustainable Transportation Data Management WorkshopStephanie Simms
NCST held a workshop for research grant recipients to provide information on the USDOT Public Access Plan and its requirements, guidance for writing a data management plan, best practices in managing data, and archiving and publishing data using the University of California’s Dash data repository. https://ncst.ucdavis.edu/research/data-management/
"Data management plans 2.0: Helping you manage your data" - webinar delivered for DataONE monthly series. Main topics include machine-actionable data management plans and the newly launched DMPTool v3.
https://www.dataone.org/webinars/data-management-plans-20-helping-you-manage-your-data
#PIDapalooza presentation in Reykjavik, Iceland on 10 Nov 2016. Persistent identifiers as an ingredient for machine-actionable data management plans. @TheDMPTool @DMPonline
DLF Panel on RDM Strategies in the Library, Oct 2015Stephanie Simms
Panel presentation at the 2015 Digital Library Federation (DLF) Forum with 5 CLIR Postdoctoral Fellows working in different university libraries to coordinate RDM strategies across campus, Vancouver, Canada, Oct 2015
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
IDCC Presentation on the Future of Data Management Planning, Feb 2016
1. The Future of DMPs:
Tools, Policies and Players
Sarah Jones
Digital Curation Centre
sarah.jones@glasgow.ac.uk
Twitter: @sjDCC
IDCC, Amsterdam, 23-24 February 2016 #idcc16
Stephanie Simms
California Digital Library
stephanie.simms@ucop.edu
Twitter: @stephrsimms
2. Overview
• DMPTool, U.S. policies and players
• DMPonline, UK/EU policies and players
• Internationalisation
• Sustaining and extending services
• Moving beyond compliance
3. DMPTool
Create, review, and share data management plans that
meet institutional and funder requirements
A short history
Launched in October 2011 following planning efforts of founding
partners: CDL, DCC, DataONE, Smithsonian, UCLA, UCSD, UIUC, UVa
Released v.2 in May 2014 with extra functionality
Roadmap for new work on API, usability in 2016
4. DMPs in the U.S. context
1. OSTP memo 2013, funder responses
2. Institution/library-led initiatives
3. Individual researchers
7. What about the researchers?
• Individual researchers using the tool, but not
reaching disciplinary communities
• Low return rates (0.86 plans/user for DMPTool)
• International users
8. A web-based tool to help researchers develop and
maintain data management plans
A short history
Launched in April 2010 at the Jisc conference
Released v.2 in March 2011 with extra functionality
Released v.3 in April 2012 with revisions in light of the DMPTool and
work from the Jisc MRD programme
Released v.4 in Dec 2013, incorporating major changes from an
evaluation and extensive user testing
Subsequent point releases in 2014-2015 to add new features
DMPonline
9. DMPs in the European context
• Lots of national RDM pilot projects
• Surge of overseas enquiries and use of DMPonline
• Requests to deliver DMP services internationally
• Translations into French, Spanish, German…
• Engagement with European Commission to advise and
train project officers
10. Locale-aware support for DMPonline
• Supporting use of the tool in different contexts
• Presentation of different (smaller set of) options
based on location / organisation / affiliation
• Single sign-on for non-UK contexts
• Support for foreign languages
11. Move towards chargeable DMP services
• Delivering separate instances of DMPonline for
University of Melbourne and DMPTuuli
• Potential for subscriptions services e.g. admin
access to customise the tool
• Libraries of templates with a feed of updates
12. Engaging with developer community
• Few active forks on DMPonline GitHub repository
• Enhancements and bug fixes shared by developer
teams in UK, Canada and Australia
• Integration projects, e.g. DMPTool with OSF
What support is needed?
• DMPonline-dev mailing list?
• Share roadmaps to avoid duplication of effort?
• Reconcile forks / commit to same codebase?
13. Key stakeholders & common interests
• Researchers
• Disciplinary communities
• Research funders
• Institutions
• Librarians
• Data centres
• Developer community
14. A single platform for all things DMP?
Co-manage, co-develop and issue joint roadmap
Benefit from pooling resources and expertise
Effective engagement with global research community
16. “A number of scientific studies indicate that most global
warming in recent decades is due to the great concentration
of greenhouse gases released mainly as a result of human
activity.” #encyclical
Editor's Notes
V.1 launched in Oct 2011, about a year after DMPonline was born, to address the specific requirements of US funders. The team of founding partners (included DCC) determined that a separate tool was necessary because the original data model for DMPonline was designed for the more centralised funding and policy situation in the UK. DMPTool was and still is offered as a free service that was instantly popular among institutions and researchers.
Partners came back together and released V.2 in May 2014, developed with grant funding from Sloan and Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). Ambitious project: with lots of extra functionality. Also aimed to promote best practices beyond minimum reqs, public library of DMPs to encourage openness and sharing, build communities across all stakeholder groups. V.2 continues to be popular, now 180 partner institutions many with SSO.
Recently issued a Roadmap: in response to community feedback, need for more usage stats, API work to integrate with other systems, improve UX for current system
Lots of activity within a few large stakeholder groups, not great coordination among them.
Government policy-makers and funders
Institutions and libraries
Individual researchers
I stole this slide from a presentation given by Amanda Whitmire and her colleagues who refer to the One Memo to Rule Them All.
The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) memo issued by the White House in Feb 2013 requiring all federal agencies that grant > $100 million annually to provide public access to the results of research. Applies to 18 federal agencies, each working independently, very decentralized in our special American way, continuing to issue new and revised requirements. Another important thing to note: this is an unfunded mandate so everyone is waiting on someone else to provide resources (infrastructure, training) for compliance. In a parallel trend, some private funders (e.g., Sloan, Moore, Gates) have their own requirements for DMPs and public access.
This slide implies that the mandate is evil, but I guess I would just say that it’s complicated.
Amanda Whitmire, Jake Carlson, Patricia Hswe, Susan Wells Parham, Lizzy Rolando & Brian Westra. 2015. “Using assessment of NSF data management plans to enable evidence-based evolution of research data services,” Research Data Access and Preservation Summit 2015 (RDAP), April 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1957/55693
Data librarians (some of whom are here at IDCC) have assumed responsibility for monitoring agency responses to the OSTP memo using this Twitter hashtag #OSTPResp and a crowd-sourced Google spreadsheet (link here). Agencies almost never announce things publicly, just sneak them out on their websites. So it really does take a village to track these evolving policies.
We currently maintain 30 U.S. funder templates in the DMPTool (list on left), not comprehensive, mainly based on demand, we need to add more. Beginning to have more direct communication with funders but slow process since it involves building personal relationships. You’ll notice these drop-down arrows because some funders have different requirements for different divisions and even specific programs, so e.g., National Science Foundation (major funder) = 13 different templates.
DMPTool also has 180 Institutional partners, primarily U.S. universities, who customize the tool for local users. More signing up every week. This reflects a rising trend in library-led initiatives to build IRs and offer DMP consultation services.
Individual researchers are using the tool, but the number of plans per user suggests low return rates. The typical grant cycle and length of funded projects may account for some of this, but we hope to incentivise greater use through enhancements to integrate DMPs with other data management systems and align them with research workflows. We see these as key advantages of forming an international partnership.
DMPTool also has international users in developing world, from unaffiliated universities – really want to understand more about these users. Recently, a data management course at Meru University in Kenya published all of their practice DMPs publicly.
This is a list of the key players we’ve identified in the DMP landscape. On both sides of the pond we’ve determined that we need to do a better job of reaching out to:
Research funders
Disciplinary communities – social networks for education about DMPs, fitting them into workflows
Other common areas of interest for our teams include:
Monitoring policies and updating templates
Supporting institutions to customise the tool and get machine-readable content
Integration with emerging standards, other RDM tools and systems
We’ve concluded that by combining our years of DMP experience to create a single hub, we can engage with evolving community initiatives more effectively, and contribute to developing standards for DMPs at an international scale. This should also help us carry more clout with funders, research communities, other stakeholders whose reach extends beyond national borders.
Move DMPs beyond a culture of compliance to promote culture change
This involves such lofty goals as:
Linking DMPs to their actual implementation
This is part of advancing open scholarship
Using the DMP as a training platform to accomplish these things
We’ll close with the Pope, who recently acknowledged the science supporting human-induced climate change. Climate research is a high profile example of why open science is a good idea. As the evidence piles up, public opinion changes, which (hopefully) increases public support of funding for scientific research and puts pressure on policymakers.
Increasingly good science is defined by openness and this can only be achieved through careful planning.
Questions?