Download to read offline
![Background
NPG (2013). Availability of data and materials. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html
PLOS (2014). PLOS Editorial and Publishing Policies. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/static/policies.action
• Journal Data Policies
• Nature Publishing Group
• “[...] authors are required to make materials, data and
associated protocols promptly available to readers
without undue qualifications. “
• PLOS
• “PLOS journals require authors to make all data
underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully
available without restriction, with rare exception.“](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/scholzeliber2015-06-25final-150625141758-lva1-app6892/75/Scholze-liber-2015-06-25_final-4-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Scholze liber 2015-06-25_final
The document outlines the mission and significance of re3data.org, a global registry of research data repositories that promotes visibility and accessibility of research data across various disciplines. It discusses compliance with data policies from entities like the European Commission and highlights the importance of sustainable practices in data sharing, including legal, technical, and financial aspects. Additionally, the document presents statistics on the indexing of research data repositories and examples of institutional and publisher cooperation with re3data.org.
More Related Content
Similar to Scholze liber 2015-06-25_final
Scholze liber 2015-06-25_final
- 1. Making Research DataRepositories Visible – The re3data.org Registry Frank Scholze | Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, KIT Library Heinz Pampel, Paul Vierkant | GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, LIS LIBER 2015 | London, June 26, 2015
- 3. Background European Commisson. (2014).Horizon 2020 Annotated Model Grant Agreements. Version 1.6.2 .Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/amga/h2020-amga_en.pdf • Funders' data policies • Example: European Commission
- 4. Background NPG (2013). Availabilityof data and materials. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html PLOS (2014). PLOS Editorial and Publishing Policies. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/static/policies.action • Journal Data Policies • Nature Publishing Group • “[...] authors are required to make materials, data and associated protocols promptly available to readers without undue qualifications. “ • PLOS • “PLOS journals require authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception.“
- 5.
- 6. re3data.org - Mission •global registry of research data repositories • covers all academic disciplines • helps researchers, funding bodies, publishers, libraries and scholarly institutions to find research data repositories • promotes a culture of sharing, increased access and better visibility of research data Pampel, H. et al. (2013). Making Research Data Repositories Visible: The re3data.org Registry. PLOS ONE, 8(11), e78080. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
- 7. Schema Vierkant, P., etal. (2014). Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories. Version 2.2. http://doi.org/10.2312/re3.006 39Properties 2.2Version Based on Analyses, Feedback and Experience
- 8. Icons Vierkant, P., etal. (2014). Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories. Version 2.2. doi:10.2312/re3.006 The research datarepository provides additional information on its ser vice. The research datarepository provides open/restricted/closed access to its data. The terms of use and licenses of the dataare provided by the research datarepository. The research datarepository provides apolicy. The research datarepository uses apersistent identifier system to make its provided data persistent,unique and citable. The research datarepository is either certified or suppor ts a repository standard. RESEARCH DATA REPOSITORY GENERAL INFORMATION POLICY LEGAL ASPECTS TECHNICAL STANDARDS QUALITY STANDARDS
- 9. Quality Requirements: • be runby a legal entity, such as a sustainable institution (e.g. library, university) • clarify access conditions to the data and repository as well as the terms of use • have focus on research data
- 10.
- 11.
- 16. RDR Typology • Institutional •Disciplinary • Multidisciplinary • Project
- 17. RDR indexed byre3data 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 Indexed Research Data Repositories
- 18. RDR by Country 48% 15% 13% 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2%2% 1% US GER UK CAN FRAN JPN AUS CH IND NED CHN DEN
- 19. Icons and numbers Froma total of 1260 RDR in re3data (June 2015) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Certification Open Access Persistent Id All Aspects
- 20. Champions by discipline 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 HSSLife Sciences Natural Sciences Engineering From a total of 88 RDR (June 2015)
- 21. Integration of re3datain Guidelines • Funder Example: European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf • Institutional Example: Bielefeld University • „Verzeichnisse, wie das DFG-geförderte "Registry of Research Data Repositories", bilden die Grundlage für die Suche nach geeigneten Publikationsorten für die Forschungsdaten. “ Universität Bielefeld (2011): Resolution zum Forschungsdatenmanagement. https://data.uni-bielefeld.de/de/resolution • Publisher Example: Nature Publishing Group • „Physics, astrophysics, astronomy and geoscience databases should be registered with re3data.org.“ Scientific Data (2013): Data policies. http://www.nature.com/sdata/data-policies
- 22. Cooperation • Deutsche Initiativefür Netzwerkinformation (DINI) • DataCite (MoU, April 2012) • OpenAIRE (MoU, October 2013) • BioSharing (MoU, November 2013) • Databib (MoU, March 2014) • DataCite (Formal cooperation, March 2015)
- 23.
- 24. Organizational sustainability • Mergerwith DataBib under the auspices of DataCite • re3data.org working group within DataCite • International Editorial Board • Cooperations within Research Data Alliance (RDA) and the research data repository community • Community building and feedback loops during RFC phases (e.g. re3data.org schema)
- 25. Technical sustainability • Openinterfaces • RESTful API • OpenSearch • Documentation: http://www.re3data.org/api/doc • Used e.g. by OpenAIRE • Open metadata • Documentation: http://www.re3data.org/schema/ • Long-term hosting commitment by KIT
- 26. Legal sustainability • Openlicenses • CC BY for the website • CC 0 for metadata
- 27. Financial sustainability • Technicalmaintenance financed by DataCite from 2016 • Further development managed by DataCite • Further project funding
- 28. Thanks to theteam • Michael Witt Purdue University, Distributed Data Curation Center (D2C2) • Roland Bertelmann, Claudio Fuchs, Heinz Pampel GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Library and Information Services (LIS) • Maxi Kindling, Jessica Rücknagel, Peter Schirmbacher, Paul Vierkant Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Library and Information Science (BLIS) • Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker, Gabriele Kloska, Evelyn Reuter, Edeltraud Schnepf, Angelika Semrau, Michael Skarupianski, Robert Ulrich Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), KIT Library
- 29. info@re3data.org http://re3data.org With the exceptionof all photos and graphics, this slides are licensed under the “Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)“ Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Editor's Notes
- #8 general information (e.g. short description of the RDR, content types, keywords) responsibilities (e.g. institutions responsible for funding, content or technical issues) policies (e.g. policies of the RDR, incl. URL) legal aspects (e.g. licenses of the database and datasets) technical standards (e.g. APIs, versioning of datasets, software of the RDR) quality standards (e.g. certificates, audit processes)
- #9 Information icons help researchers to easily identify an adequate repository for the storage and reuse of their data.
- #19 US 654 GER 196 UK 176 CAN 65 FRAN 49 JPN 42 AUS 45 CH 33 IND 27 NED 28 CHN 23 DEN 17
- #20 Certification 231 Open Access 1066 (access to repo, access to data, data upload) Persistent Id 388 All Aspects 88 Access to Repository Access to Data Data Upload
- #21 HSS 52 Archaeology Data Service ads , CLARIN-ERIC Life Sciences 21 NeuroMorpho, cancerData Natural Sciences 34 astronomy dataverse network, Easy Dans, pangaea Engineering 11 3tudatacentrum