This document discusses the reliability of information presented on an unknown website. Some points argue that the information can be verified through Google searches and the website aims to provide factual information without bias. Other points counter that the website cannot be reliably checked, is not a well-known source, and only presents one perspective without linking to additional information. In the end, the reliability and aims of the website are unclear from the discussion.

1. 4. Yes we can
1. We can know check. Because
who write this when I go to
article Google and type
about this article I
can find same
information
2. This site is clear 5. This article is
because BBC is not bias because
famous website they tell true story
and they want to
give information
about this article
3. This website 6. Yes , This
achieve it’s aims? website give other
Yes because it website that I can
give a lot of go
information.

2. 4. I don’t think
1. I don’t know this information
who wrote this can be check.
article Because I check
on Google and
they show
2. I don’t think
different
this website is
information
clear because this
website is not
popular and I
5. I think it’s bias
don’t know what
because they
did they talking
keep telling one
about.
topic .
3. This website
achieve it’s aims? 6. No, because
No. because it’s they don’t give
give information any link that I can
but they give find other
information that information about
we don’t need this article