1. 1. There is no author of this web site.
2. Yes the aims of the site is clear.
The aim of the site is trying to
persuade us to buy dehydrated
water.
3. No it does not achieve its aim
because it doesn’t seem interesting
to me.
4. It is relevant to me because it is
about water and everyone needs
water.
5. The information can not be
checked because there is no other
website about this information.
6. It does not say when the site was
published.
7. The information is biased.
8. No, the web site doesn’t give any other links Throughout the web site, they tell us
or other web sites to check information. how horrible all the other kinds of
water are.

2. 1. There is an author of this article.
2. Yes, the aims of the site is clear. The aim of
the site is to inform us that there is still no
evidence of mobile phones harm to health
but it might be a long-term effect.
3. Yes, the site achieved its aims. It gave us a
lot of information about mobile phones being
harmless or might be harm to human health.
4. The site is relevant to me because I also use
mobile phones so the information help a lot.
5. Yes the information can be checked. They
gave us where they got the information from
so we can research about the HPA.
6. The site was published on April 26, 2012.
7. No the information is not biased because
they said that there is still no evidence mobile
phones harm human health but they also said
that it might be a long-term effect.
8. Yes the website gave many other stories
and other websites.