SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 40
HOW to WRITE
  THE SALIENT
   PARTS OF A
THESIS PROPOSAL
        Arbaya A. Haron-Boquia, MIE

        A lecture presented during the seminar-workshop
          on Thesis Proposal Writing (January 30, 2013)
2
  Developing the Content Domain of the
Pertinent Chapters of a Research Proposal
                   By: Luz B. Sanchez



The Research Proposal
      A research proposal is a written presentation
on the planned investigation of a research problem
or issue which the thesis or dissertation writer
contemplates to undertake for his study. It is
defended before a Research Proposal Committee
that decides on whether the thesis-dissertation
       writer is to proceed with his study or
       whether he ahs to change or modify his title
3




and his planned content domain by improving parts
thereof.

Generally, a research proposal embodies the tentative
text of Chapter 1, The Problem and Its Background;
Chapter 2, Review of Related Literature and Studies;
Chapter 3, Research Methodology

TITLE

      The choice of a good title for the study poses a
demanding but challenging search for an area of
investigation that is closely related to the researcher’s
professional goals, expertise, experience, and interest.
4




While the encyclopedia of educational research,
research journals, thesis-dissertation abstracts, annotated
bibliographies of National PAGE, FAPE and other
universities are good sources of reference for thesis-
dissertation titles and studies, yet the final choice largely
depends on the researcher’s interest, creativity, ingenuity
and advice of his mentor, members of the research
proposal committee, and the defense panel.

Requisite of a Good Title
      The title is a brief descriptive label that subsumes
the theme of the study as a whole.
       It names the major variables that are the subject of
   investigations, thereby giving an instant grasp of what
   the study is all about. It answers the questions of
   “what,” ”who,” and “where.”
5




The question “when” ; that is , the school year covered by
the study should not included in the title since this can be
appropriately included under the section, “Scope and
Delimitation of the study.”

Similarly, such phrases as “ A Study of,” “An Analysis of,”
“An Evaluation of,” etc. are to be avoided as the use of such
phrases only serves to lengthen the title unnecessarily
without adding much meaning to it.

The title must also be “eye-catching” and thought-
provoking” so as to titillate the reader’s attention, to arouse
       his intellectual curiosity into reading further the text of
       manuscript, and to simultaneously achieve brevity.
6
Verbosely-worded Titles Recasted into Improved Briefly-worded Titles


Verbosely-worded Titles             Improved Briefly-worded
                                    Titles
A Comparative study of the          Administrators’, Peers’ and
Administrators’, Teachers’,         Students’ Evaluation of
and Students’ Ratings of            Teacher Performance in
Teaching Efficiency of              Region X
Teachers in Region X
The Married Employees’              Employees’ Income-
Sideline and How These              augmenting Practices: Their
affect their Work                   Effect on Work Performance
Performance and Families’           and Family-related Variables
Socio-economic Status,
Education, and Recreational
Activities
7

Transforming a problematic situation to a
  researchable problem
 Sources of problem may emerge from a
  problematic situation
 E.g. A teacher is disappointed about his students’
  negative attitude towards writing. In particular, he
  finds them reluctant in submitting their assignment.
  After reflecting on what the possible causes are,
  he considers the following tentative explanations:
 The textbook or instructional materials are too
  difficult for them to understand.
 The cognitive skills of the students are very poor.
                                                    8




 The teaching method is boring.
 The teacher is not competent to teach the subject.
 One or more of the tentative explanations could
  possibly be the solution to the problem, while the
  others could be deleted.
 The method of teaching the subject, the entry
  behavior of the students, the influence of the
  home environment on learning, the personality of
  the teacher, the teaching style of the teacher, and
  the textbook used can be treated as independent
  variables and to determine the attitude of students
        towards writing, is the dependent variable.
9
       HOW TO WRITE THE SALIENT PARTS OF THE PROPOSAL


                           Chapter 1

             THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

INTRODUCTION
Approaches suggested on how to start the introductory section
 1. Start with a brief but provocative quotation that is
  applicable to the theme of the study;
 2. Commence with striking facts or statistics that objectively
  portray the existing problem situation;
 3. Begin by presenting a very brief or resumé of events that
  truly depict the present state of the issue abroad, in the
  country, and in the locality;
 4. Begin with the researcher’s firm stand on  10


  the need to bridge the gap between existing
  bodies of knowledge and the prevailing
  problem situation;
 5. Start with the researcher’s rationale
  concerning the need to replicate a
  completed; or
 6. If a new theory is envisioned for the
  study, commence by attacking pertinent
  universally- held theories of psychologists,
  social scientists, or experts on the subjects
          and giving the rationale behind this
           research undertaking.
11
The introductory section starts with
 broad general statements on the
 existing situation and narrow it down
 progressively to a point where it is
 finally linked to the rationale behind the
 research project. It is cautioned;
 however, to refrain from presenting in the
 introductory section the statement on the
 research problem itself. Its appropriate
 place is in the section labeled, “Statement
 of the Problem.” Similarly, discussion on
 the significance of the study to one’s
        agency, or to one’s self should not
12
be taken up in the introductory section. Its exposition is
 best reserved for the section, “Significance of the Study.”
In short, overlaps in the content domain from one
Topic to the next should be avoided.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

  Presented under this section are the main problem
  statement and the corresponding sub-problems.
 The main problem is generally expressed in a
  DECLARATIVE statement that is more or less consistent
  with the title of the study. It is followed by the sub-
  problems which are usually stated in question form.
13
Example:
The main focus of this study was to find out the
   reading comprehension level of grade VI pupils
   using the traditional approach and multi-media in
   their reading comprehension.
   Specifically, this aimed to answer the following
   questions:
1. What is the reading performance level of the
   pupils using the traditional approach?
2. What is the reading performance of the pupils
   multi-media in reading?
3. Is there any significance difference between the
   traditional approach and using multi-media on
   their reading comprehension?
14




• Some thesis-dissertation writers though prefer to
  use declarative statements in the presentation of
  both the main and sub-problems. Whichever of the
  above form is chosen by the researcher, he is
  cautioned to use a reasonably delimited main
  problem for an in-depth study. From three to seven
  sub-problems are suggested where the
  dimensions are researchable units by themselves
  that serve to expand or circumscribe the main
  problem.
15



• In the choice of a good research problem, the
  following criteria are to be considered:
 1. It must be original and novel;
 2. It must be relevant to society’s needs and to
  one’s field of specialization or interest;
 3. It must reflect a noteworthy contribution to the
  country’s national development and progress;
 4. It must express a relationship between two or
       or more variables; and
 5. It must imply possibilities of empirical testing.
Significance of the Study
                                                         16




  This section discusses the importance of the
  study to society, the country, the government,
  the community, the institution, the agency
  concerned and the thesis-dissertation writer
  himself. It expounds the study’s probable impact
  to education, science, technology, on-going
  researches, etc. It also gives the justification for
  the study in terms of its contribution to theory
  and practice. Lastly, it touches on the
  significance of the study to the researcher
  himself, what it does to his profession, and the
  difference it makes to his own professional
  growth.
17

SCOPE AND DELIMITATION
 Explained in this section it’s nature, coverage, and time
 frame of the study. It presents in brief the subject areas
 of investigation, the number of respondents or subjects
 involved the place, the time period or school year
 covered, and the rationale behind delimiting the scope
 of the study.
 Reasons advanced by well-known authority-sources are
 cited to support the researcher’s rationale for delimiting
 the scope of the study. As pointed out, a sufficiently
 delimited study generally permits in-dept and thorough
 investigation within the envisioned time frame while a
 study that is too broad in coverage with too many
 overlapping sub-problems tends to be superficial and
 sketchily treated and produces results that are unwieldy,
 insignificant, and inconsistent for the purposes of
 generalization and conclusions on the study.
18
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Under this topical component are the OPERATIONAL and
CONCEPTUAL definition of the terms that are found in the title
of the study, including other unusual and technical terms.
However, some schools require the inclusion of only those
terms that are found in the title of the study. The other unusual
and technical terms are defined on the pertinent page(s) of the
manuscript where first mentioned. Whichever approach is
followed, it is cautioned to refrain from using only the
conceptual or dictionary definition the terms presented.
OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS are “musts” as these show
how each concept or aspect is to operate or be measured in
the study. To show how an operational definition of a term
differs from a conceptual definition of the same term,
examples are
        shown:
19


• Example: Operational and Conceptual Definition of Terms:
• Operational definition of      the term      ACADEMIC
  ACHIEVEMENT
•       Academic achievement refers to the mean scores
  obtained in a standardized achievement test where
  students are classified as to high achievers(90-100;
  average achievers(70-90); and low achievers (Less than
  70).
• NOTE:
•           To another researcher, the term, academic
  achievement, as used in his study, may mean the grade
  point average(GPA) obtained in all subjects at the end of
  the semester.
20



• Conceptual definition of the same term,
  ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT:
•      Academic achievement connotes the level
  of learning which a student acquires in class
  based on his ability to apply what he has
  learned in a subject course.
21

              Chapter 2
Review of Related Literature and Studies

 This chapter starts with a very brief
 introductory paragraph concerning the
 researcher’s exploration of related literature
 and studies on the research problem. It
 states the main coverage of the said
 chapter, to wit:(1) Related Literature and (2)
 Related Studies. If no studies were included
 due to their non-availability, it is so stated in
 the introductory part of the chapter, and the
 chapter’s heading is modified to “REVIEW
 OF RELATED LITERATURE” only.
22
RELATED LITERATURE
       The introductory paragraph under this main
 topical component merely enumerates the topical
 sections by subject areas that are to be covered
 in it.

 Organization of the Topical Section under the
 Related Literature Component
      Each topical section is organized according
 to the subject area or variables that is related to
 each of the sub-problem under investigation.
 However, some thesis-dissertation writers prefer
 to use each author’s
         name as a section heading and to discuss
23




therein as many variables or subject areas which
each author has expounded on. While others do
away entirely with the topical sections, they merely
narrate one after the other the cited authority-
sources’ expositions on several variables or
dimensional aspects, with no topical divisions
whatsoever. The advantage of organizing the
discussion around a topical conceptual scheme or
variable is to provide a clear delineation among the
various variables and aspects under investigation for
a more illuminating and comprehensive background
of explored facts and information that can help enrich
the research design of the study.
24
Nature and Purpose of the Review

 NATURE.
        The review on related literature embodies
 the cited theories, principles, concepts, Facts,
 ideas and views regarding the pertinent variables
 or aspects as gleaned from books, research
 journals, monographs, and other scholarly
 publications perused by the researcher when
 searching for a research problem for the study.
 Many other reference sources are to be availed of
 by the researcher for the review. These are to be
 critically appraised to determine which ones are
 worthy of inclusion in the review section.
25



PURPOSE
   The main purpose of the related literature review
is to provide the thesis writer with the theoretical
background of information on what is already known
on the area of interest and what still needs to be
done for his research undertaking. It furnishes him
with ample research possibilities by which to
expand, modify, and/or improve parts of his planned
study to make it more novel and noteworthy. It also
opens up avenues of rich ideas to the reader who
may be interested in undertaking a similar project for
his own study or for some other purposes.
26
 Essentials in Developing the Content Domain of Each of the Topical
          Section under the Related Literature Component
Discussed hereunder are the guidelines to be considered when developing
the topical sections under the related literature component:
       Cited views of authority-sources. Expounded under
each topical section are the cited views and expositions of
well-known authors, scientists, theorists, psychologists, and
experts on the subject areas or variables that are related to the
research problem. Their respective theories, concepts, and
informational facts on the subject are compared, contrasted,
and critically analyzed in relation to another and to the
research problem itself. The cited paraphrased ideas or quoted
            statements of such authors serve as the core of
discussion under each topical section. Care, however, must be
exercised to insure that the whole component presentation is
not mere series of quoted or paraphrased paragraphs of cited
authority-sources.
27



Significance and relevance of the review to the study itself.
       While extensive readings on related literature may have
been undertaken by the researcher, yet only the very significant
highly relevant ones are cited and discussed in the chapter on
elated literature. The significance and meaning of the explored
areas of knowledge are explained in terms of the specific
insights that can help improve the research design of his study.

       A synthesized summary at the end of the “Related
Literature” component is deemed essential to show how the
explored areas are related to one another and how each
contribute to the improvement of the planned problem area and
           variables of the study.
28
           Tips on Structuring Literature Reviews


         A common error in literature reviews is for writers to present
materials from one author, followed by information from another, then
another… The way in which you group authors and link ideas will
help avoid this problem. To group authors who draw similar
conclusions, you can use linking words such as:
• also
• additionally
• again
• similarly

        When authors disagree, linking words that indicate contrast
will show how you have analysed their work. Words such as:
        • however
        • conversely
        • on the other hand
        • nonetheless
              will indicate to your reader how you have analysed the
              material.
29




At other times you may want to qualify an author’s
work (using such words as specifically, usually or
generally) or use an example (thus, namely, to
illustrate). In this way you ensure that you are
synthesising the material, not just describing the work
already carried out in your field.
Related Studies
                                              30




• Embodied under this main topical
  component are:
 the cited studies of thesis-dissertation
  authors and others who have conducted
  researches abroad and in the Philippines.

    Its organization and other essentials
    are presented next to guide the thesis-
 dissertation writer when he works on this
 component
Organization of the Related Studies’ Component   31




• Studies Abroad
• Studies in the Philippines
Nature and Purpose of the Review
Nature---Discussed under “Studies Abroad”
  and “Studies in the Philippines” are cited
  completed studies’ research problems and
  findings, including some other noteworthy
  and unique research designs,
  conclusions, and/or recommendations.
32



Purpose
 The purposes of the related studies’
 review section are to provide an overview
 and assessment of the merits and/or
 shortcomings of previous research
 investigations out of which ideas can be
 generated on probable research
 dimensions that may be included or
 modified in the contemplated study.
33
                     Chapter 3

           RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
      This chapter commences with a brief statement
enumerating the main topics that are to be covered in it;
namely: Research Design and Research Procedure.
RESEARCH DESIGN
        This section briefly describe the types of research
method(s) used. Depending on the nature and purpose of the
study, any one of the following research methods may be
availed of: descriptive, correlational, causal-comparative,
historical, experimental, quasi-experimental, and/or special
types such as ethnographic or biblical research.
Locale of the Study                                           34



         This section describes in brief the place where the
study was conducted and the rationale behind its choice. A
map showing the exact location in
  relation to the community and its neighboring towns is
included if the same has not been included under the
topical component, “DEFINITION OF TERMS,” when the
research locale was described.

    Respondents of the Study
          Discussed in this section are the population of
    interest and the sampling of subjects used in the study.
35
Sample and Sampling Technique
  This section describes in detail the sampling procedure
  used in the choice of the subjects for the study. Its purpose
  is to show how the sample group(s) was selected and
  whether it is representative of the population of interest.

    Research Instrument
        The details on the research instrument(s) that was
    used are described in this section. Its nature, purpose,
    construction,     content-validation, pre-testing,  and
    rationale for its use are explained. Tests and research
    instruments that are standardized are preferred over
    self-constructed ones as the former have already been
    nation-wide and are universally accepted for public
    consumption and commercial use.
36
 Statistical tool
This section describes the statistical tool(s) used in
interpreting the data gathered if the research is
quantitative research.
 Data Gathering Procedure
       This main component contains the step-by-step
 procedure used in the administration of the research or
 experimental instrument(s) for the study. It covers more or
 less, the following:
 1. Securing permission to conduct the study or the
 experiment. The approved letter of request is attached as
 an appendix to the researcher’ manuscript;
 2. Orienting the respondents or the subjects on the
 purpose of the study and instructing them how to
 accomplish the instruments or tests. Questions raised, if
 any, are duly answered;
37




3. Administering the research instrument(s) or conducting the
experiment within a specified time frame;
4. Retrieving the duly accomplished research or achievemen
test data for statistical treatment and analysis
38


            References:

 1. Sanchez, Luz B. DEVELOPING THE
  CONTENT DOMAIN OF THE
  PERTINENT CHAPTERS OF A
  RESEARCH PROPOSAL, compiled by:
  Dr. ARMIA U.EBRAHIM
 2. Language Research lectures and notes,
  compiled by Riceli Mendoza,Ph.D. (in
  Applied Linguistics)
39



         The End




   for


Listening
40

More Related Content

What's hot

Chapter 2:review of related literature and studies
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studiesChapter 2:review of related literature and studies
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studiesmhel15
 
Research writing (Experimental Design)
Research writing (Experimental Design)Research writing (Experimental Design)
Research writing (Experimental Design)Jimnaira Abanto
 
Related Literature and Studies
Related Literature and StudiesRelated Literature and Studies
Related Literature and StudiesRoqui Malijan
 
Lesson 14 writing coherent review of literature
Lesson 14 writing coherent review of literatureLesson 14 writing coherent review of literature
Lesson 14 writing coherent review of literaturemjlobetos
 
Review of related literature presentation
Review of related literature presentation Review of related literature presentation
Review of related literature presentation Hotaru Imai
 
Chapter 3 research methodology
Chapter 3 research methodologyChapter 3 research methodology
Chapter 3 research methodologyNeilson Silva
 
Practical Research 1
 Practical Research 1 Practical Research 1
Practical Research 1Monte Christo
 
10. review-of-related-literature (1)
10. review-of-related-literature (1)10. review-of-related-literature (1)
10. review-of-related-literature (1)JamesRaid
 
Data presentation and interpretation I Quantitative Research
Data presentation and interpretation I Quantitative ResearchData presentation and interpretation I Quantitative Research
Data presentation and interpretation I Quantitative ResearchJimnaira Abanto
 
Rationale justification significance of study
Rationale justification significance of studyRationale justification significance of study
Rationale justification significance of studyDendenden Dendenden
 
Review of related literature -ppt
Review of related literature -ppt Review of related literature -ppt
Review of related literature -ppt SharmilaPrasad2
 
Lesson 12 citing related literature using standard styles
Lesson 12 citing related literature using standard stylesLesson 12 citing related literature using standard styles
Lesson 12 citing related literature using standard stylesmjlobetos
 
Writing thesis chapters 1-3 guidelines
Writing thesis chapters 1-3 guidelinesWriting thesis chapters 1-3 guidelines
Writing thesis chapters 1-3 guidelinespoleyseugenio
 
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywordslimitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywordsKamal Marwat
 

What's hot (20)

Writing the rrl
Writing the rrlWriting the rrl
Writing the rrl
 
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studies
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studiesChapter 2:review of related literature and studies
Chapter 2:review of related literature and studies
 
Research writing (Experimental Design)
Research writing (Experimental Design)Research writing (Experimental Design)
Research writing (Experimental Design)
 
Related Literature and Studies
Related Literature and StudiesRelated Literature and Studies
Related Literature and Studies
 
Research methodology handbook 1
Research methodology handbook 1Research methodology handbook 1
Research methodology handbook 1
 
Lesson 14 writing coherent review of literature
Lesson 14 writing coherent review of literatureLesson 14 writing coherent review of literature
Lesson 14 writing coherent review of literature
 
Review of related literature presentation
Review of related literature presentation Review of related literature presentation
Review of related literature presentation
 
Research Instrumentation
Research InstrumentationResearch Instrumentation
Research Instrumentation
 
Chapter 3 research methodology
Chapter 3 research methodologyChapter 3 research methodology
Chapter 3 research methodology
 
Types of descriptive research
Types of descriptive researchTypes of descriptive research
Types of descriptive research
 
Practical Research 1
 Practical Research 1 Practical Research 1
Practical Research 1
 
10. review-of-related-literature (1)
10. review-of-related-literature (1)10. review-of-related-literature (1)
10. review-of-related-literature (1)
 
Data presentation and interpretation I Quantitative Research
Data presentation and interpretation I Quantitative ResearchData presentation and interpretation I Quantitative Research
Data presentation and interpretation I Quantitative Research
 
Rationale justification significance of study
Rationale justification significance of studyRationale justification significance of study
Rationale justification significance of study
 
Review of related literature -ppt
Review of related literature -ppt Review of related literature -ppt
Review of related literature -ppt
 
Conceptual and theoretical framework
Conceptual and theoretical frameworkConceptual and theoretical framework
Conceptual and theoretical framework
 
Lesson 12 citing related literature using standard styles
Lesson 12 citing related literature using standard stylesLesson 12 citing related literature using standard styles
Lesson 12 citing related literature using standard styles
 
Writing thesis chapters 1-3 guidelines
Writing thesis chapters 1-3 guidelinesWriting thesis chapters 1-3 guidelines
Writing thesis chapters 1-3 guidelines
 
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywordslimitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
 
Conceptual framework
Conceptual frameworkConceptual framework
Conceptual framework
 

Viewers also liked

My M.S. Thesis Proposal
My M.S. Thesis ProposalMy M.S. Thesis Proposal
My M.S. Thesis ProposalYaser Sulaiman
 
Areas and-thesis-proposal-outline
Areas and-thesis-proposal-outlineAreas and-thesis-proposal-outline
Areas and-thesis-proposal-outlineJulyn Mae Pagmanoja
 
Thesis outline ppt (1)
Thesis outline ppt (1)Thesis outline ppt (1)
Thesis outline ppt (1)omer2579
 
How to write architectural thesis
How to write architectural thesisHow to write architectural thesis
How to write architectural thesisPranay Kumar Tode
 
Architectural thesis-manual
Architectural thesis-manualArchitectural thesis-manual
Architectural thesis-manualLawrence Ting
 
The Research Proposal
The Research ProposalThe Research Proposal
The Research Proposalguest349908
 

Viewers also liked (8)

My M.S. Thesis Proposal
My M.S. Thesis ProposalMy M.S. Thesis Proposal
My M.S. Thesis Proposal
 
Areas and-thesis-proposal-outline
Areas and-thesis-proposal-outlineAreas and-thesis-proposal-outline
Areas and-thesis-proposal-outline
 
Thesis presentation
Thesis presentationThesis presentation
Thesis presentation
 
Thesis outline ppt (1)
Thesis outline ppt (1)Thesis outline ppt (1)
Thesis outline ppt (1)
 
How to write architectural thesis
How to write architectural thesisHow to write architectural thesis
How to write architectural thesis
 
Architectural thesis-manual
Architectural thesis-manualArchitectural thesis-manual
Architectural thesis-manual
 
How to write a statement problem
How to write a statement problemHow to write a statement problem
How to write a statement problem
 
The Research Proposal
The Research ProposalThe Research Proposal
The Research Proposal
 

Similar to How to write thesis proposal

Chapter 1 Introsduction
Chapter 1 IntrosductionChapter 1 Introsduction
Chapter 1 IntrosductionEric Aguilar
 
How to make a research paper
How to make a research paperHow to make a research paper
How to make a research paperNeth AC
 
Identifying-the-inquiry-and-stating-the-problem.lesson.3.pptx
Identifying-the-inquiry-and-stating-the-problem.lesson.3.pptxIdentifying-the-inquiry-and-stating-the-problem.lesson.3.pptx
Identifying-the-inquiry-and-stating-the-problem.lesson.3.pptxMariaRuffaDulayIrinc
 
CHAPTER 2 - THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
CHAPTER 2 - THE RESEARCH PROBLEMCHAPTER 2 - THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
CHAPTER 2 - THE RESEARCH PROBLEMCRISALDO CORDURA
 
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantita
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantitaCHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantita
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantitaEstelaJeffery653
 
Report writing format
Report writing formatReport writing format
Report writing formatRustam Ali
 
1.1-Research-Guidelines-and-Format.pdf
1.1-Research-Guidelines-and-Format.pdf1.1-Research-Guidelines-and-Format.pdf
1.1-Research-Guidelines-and-Format.pdfaRIANNEdIEZgALEOS
 
CHAPTER 10. THESIS WRITING
CHAPTER 10. THESIS WRITINGCHAPTER 10. THESIS WRITING
CHAPTER 10. THESIS WRITINGMiAnnHae
 
.......Final worksheet manual synopsis
.......Final worksheet manual synopsis.......Final worksheet manual synopsis
.......Final worksheet manual synopsisInvisible_Vision
 
thecomponentsofresearchproposal-160305120959.pdf
thecomponentsofresearchproposal-160305120959.pdfthecomponentsofresearchproposal-160305120959.pdf
thecomponentsofresearchproposal-160305120959.pdfIqraAli875037
 
LESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptx
LESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptxLESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptx
LESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptxJasonPDelosSantos
 

Similar to How to write thesis proposal (20)

Chapter 1 Introsduction
Chapter 1 IntrosductionChapter 1 Introsduction
Chapter 1 Introsduction
 
Chapter 1
Chapter 1Chapter 1
Chapter 1
 
How to make a research paper
How to make a research paperHow to make a research paper
How to make a research paper
 
26093 2
26093 226093 2
26093 2
 
chapter 2
chapter 2chapter 2
chapter 2
 
How to make a research paper
How to make a research paperHow to make a research paper
How to make a research paper
 
Identifying-the-inquiry-and-stating-the-problem.lesson.3.pptx
Identifying-the-inquiry-and-stating-the-problem.lesson.3.pptxIdentifying-the-inquiry-and-stating-the-problem.lesson.3.pptx
Identifying-the-inquiry-and-stating-the-problem.lesson.3.pptx
 
CHAPTER 2 - THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
CHAPTER 2 - THE RESEARCH PROBLEMCHAPTER 2 - THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
CHAPTER 2 - THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
 
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantita
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantitaCHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantita
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATUREBesides selecting a quantita
 
Report writing format
Report writing formatReport writing format
Report writing format
 
1.1-Research-Guidelines-and-Format.pdf
1.1-Research-Guidelines-and-Format.pdf1.1-Research-Guidelines-and-Format.pdf
1.1-Research-Guidelines-and-Format.pdf
 
Lesson 3 chapter 1
Lesson 3   chapter 1Lesson 3   chapter 1
Lesson 3 chapter 1
 
CHAPTER 10. THESIS WRITING
CHAPTER 10. THESIS WRITINGCHAPTER 10. THESIS WRITING
CHAPTER 10. THESIS WRITING
 
.......Final worksheet manual synopsis
.......Final worksheet manual synopsis.......Final worksheet manual synopsis
.......Final worksheet manual synopsis
 
Lesson 3 chapter 1
Lesson 3   chapter 1Lesson 3   chapter 1
Lesson 3 chapter 1
 
My research report
My research reportMy research report
My research report
 
thecomponentsofresearchproposal-160305120959.pdf
thecomponentsofresearchproposal-160305120959.pdfthecomponentsofresearchproposal-160305120959.pdf
thecomponentsofresearchproposal-160305120959.pdf
 
The components of research proposal
The components of research proposalThe components of research proposal
The components of research proposal
 
LESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptx
LESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptxLESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptx
LESSON 2 IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM & ASKING THE.pptx
 
Thesis Writing
Thesis WritingThesis Writing
Thesis Writing
 

How to write thesis proposal

  • 1. HOW to WRITE THE SALIENT PARTS OF A THESIS PROPOSAL Arbaya A. Haron-Boquia, MIE A lecture presented during the seminar-workshop on Thesis Proposal Writing (January 30, 2013)
  • 2. 2 Developing the Content Domain of the Pertinent Chapters of a Research Proposal By: Luz B. Sanchez The Research Proposal A research proposal is a written presentation on the planned investigation of a research problem or issue which the thesis or dissertation writer contemplates to undertake for his study. It is defended before a Research Proposal Committee that decides on whether the thesis-dissertation writer is to proceed with his study or whether he ahs to change or modify his title
  • 3. 3 and his planned content domain by improving parts thereof. Generally, a research proposal embodies the tentative text of Chapter 1, The Problem and Its Background; Chapter 2, Review of Related Literature and Studies; Chapter 3, Research Methodology TITLE  The choice of a good title for the study poses a demanding but challenging search for an area of investigation that is closely related to the researcher’s professional goals, expertise, experience, and interest.
  • 4. 4 While the encyclopedia of educational research, research journals, thesis-dissertation abstracts, annotated bibliographies of National PAGE, FAPE and other universities are good sources of reference for thesis- dissertation titles and studies, yet the final choice largely depends on the researcher’s interest, creativity, ingenuity and advice of his mentor, members of the research proposal committee, and the defense panel. Requisite of a Good Title  The title is a brief descriptive label that subsumes the theme of the study as a whole. It names the major variables that are the subject of investigations, thereby giving an instant grasp of what the study is all about. It answers the questions of “what,” ”who,” and “where.”
  • 5. 5 The question “when” ; that is , the school year covered by the study should not included in the title since this can be appropriately included under the section, “Scope and Delimitation of the study.” Similarly, such phrases as “ A Study of,” “An Analysis of,” “An Evaluation of,” etc. are to be avoided as the use of such phrases only serves to lengthen the title unnecessarily without adding much meaning to it. The title must also be “eye-catching” and thought- provoking” so as to titillate the reader’s attention, to arouse his intellectual curiosity into reading further the text of manuscript, and to simultaneously achieve brevity.
  • 6. 6 Verbosely-worded Titles Recasted into Improved Briefly-worded Titles Verbosely-worded Titles Improved Briefly-worded Titles A Comparative study of the Administrators’, Peers’ and Administrators’, Teachers’, Students’ Evaluation of and Students’ Ratings of Teacher Performance in Teaching Efficiency of Region X Teachers in Region X The Married Employees’ Employees’ Income- Sideline and How These augmenting Practices: Their affect their Work Effect on Work Performance Performance and Families’ and Family-related Variables Socio-economic Status, Education, and Recreational Activities
  • 7. 7 Transforming a problematic situation to a researchable problem  Sources of problem may emerge from a problematic situation  E.g. A teacher is disappointed about his students’ negative attitude towards writing. In particular, he finds them reluctant in submitting their assignment. After reflecting on what the possible causes are, he considers the following tentative explanations:  The textbook or instructional materials are too difficult for them to understand.
  • 8.  The cognitive skills of the students are very poor. 8  The teaching method is boring.  The teacher is not competent to teach the subject.  One or more of the tentative explanations could possibly be the solution to the problem, while the others could be deleted.  The method of teaching the subject, the entry behavior of the students, the influence of the home environment on learning, the personality of the teacher, the teaching style of the teacher, and the textbook used can be treated as independent variables and to determine the attitude of students towards writing, is the dependent variable.
  • 9. 9 HOW TO WRITE THE SALIENT PARTS OF THE PROPOSAL Chapter 1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION Approaches suggested on how to start the introductory section  1. Start with a brief but provocative quotation that is applicable to the theme of the study;  2. Commence with striking facts or statistics that objectively portray the existing problem situation;  3. Begin by presenting a very brief or resumé of events that truly depict the present state of the issue abroad, in the country, and in the locality;
  • 10.  4. Begin with the researcher’s firm stand on 10 the need to bridge the gap between existing bodies of knowledge and the prevailing problem situation;  5. Start with the researcher’s rationale concerning the need to replicate a completed; or  6. If a new theory is envisioned for the study, commence by attacking pertinent universally- held theories of psychologists, social scientists, or experts on the subjects and giving the rationale behind this research undertaking.
  • 11. 11 The introductory section starts with broad general statements on the existing situation and narrow it down progressively to a point where it is finally linked to the rationale behind the research project. It is cautioned; however, to refrain from presenting in the introductory section the statement on the research problem itself. Its appropriate place is in the section labeled, “Statement of the Problem.” Similarly, discussion on the significance of the study to one’s agency, or to one’s self should not
  • 12. 12 be taken up in the introductory section. Its exposition is best reserved for the section, “Significance of the Study.” In short, overlaps in the content domain from one Topic to the next should be avoided. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Presented under this section are the main problem statement and the corresponding sub-problems.  The main problem is generally expressed in a DECLARATIVE statement that is more or less consistent with the title of the study. It is followed by the sub- problems which are usually stated in question form.
  • 13. 13 Example: The main focus of this study was to find out the reading comprehension level of grade VI pupils using the traditional approach and multi-media in their reading comprehension. Specifically, this aimed to answer the following questions: 1. What is the reading performance level of the pupils using the traditional approach? 2. What is the reading performance of the pupils multi-media in reading? 3. Is there any significance difference between the traditional approach and using multi-media on their reading comprehension?
  • 14. 14 • Some thesis-dissertation writers though prefer to use declarative statements in the presentation of both the main and sub-problems. Whichever of the above form is chosen by the researcher, he is cautioned to use a reasonably delimited main problem for an in-depth study. From three to seven sub-problems are suggested where the dimensions are researchable units by themselves that serve to expand or circumscribe the main problem.
  • 15. 15 • In the choice of a good research problem, the following criteria are to be considered:  1. It must be original and novel;  2. It must be relevant to society’s needs and to one’s field of specialization or interest;  3. It must reflect a noteworthy contribution to the country’s national development and progress;  4. It must express a relationship between two or or more variables; and  5. It must imply possibilities of empirical testing.
  • 16. Significance of the Study 16 This section discusses the importance of the study to society, the country, the government, the community, the institution, the agency concerned and the thesis-dissertation writer himself. It expounds the study’s probable impact to education, science, technology, on-going researches, etc. It also gives the justification for the study in terms of its contribution to theory and practice. Lastly, it touches on the significance of the study to the researcher himself, what it does to his profession, and the difference it makes to his own professional growth.
  • 17. 17 SCOPE AND DELIMITATION Explained in this section it’s nature, coverage, and time frame of the study. It presents in brief the subject areas of investigation, the number of respondents or subjects involved the place, the time period or school year covered, and the rationale behind delimiting the scope of the study. Reasons advanced by well-known authority-sources are cited to support the researcher’s rationale for delimiting the scope of the study. As pointed out, a sufficiently delimited study generally permits in-dept and thorough investigation within the envisioned time frame while a study that is too broad in coverage with too many overlapping sub-problems tends to be superficial and sketchily treated and produces results that are unwieldy, insignificant, and inconsistent for the purposes of generalization and conclusions on the study.
  • 18. 18 DEFINITION OF TERMS Under this topical component are the OPERATIONAL and CONCEPTUAL definition of the terms that are found in the title of the study, including other unusual and technical terms. However, some schools require the inclusion of only those terms that are found in the title of the study. The other unusual and technical terms are defined on the pertinent page(s) of the manuscript where first mentioned. Whichever approach is followed, it is cautioned to refrain from using only the conceptual or dictionary definition the terms presented. OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS are “musts” as these show how each concept or aspect is to operate or be measured in the study. To show how an operational definition of a term differs from a conceptual definition of the same term, examples are shown:
  • 19. 19 • Example: Operational and Conceptual Definition of Terms: • Operational definition of the term ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT • Academic achievement refers to the mean scores obtained in a standardized achievement test where students are classified as to high achievers(90-100; average achievers(70-90); and low achievers (Less than 70). • NOTE: • To another researcher, the term, academic achievement, as used in his study, may mean the grade point average(GPA) obtained in all subjects at the end of the semester.
  • 20. 20 • Conceptual definition of the same term, ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT: • Academic achievement connotes the level of learning which a student acquires in class based on his ability to apply what he has learned in a subject course.
  • 21. 21 Chapter 2 Review of Related Literature and Studies This chapter starts with a very brief introductory paragraph concerning the researcher’s exploration of related literature and studies on the research problem. It states the main coverage of the said chapter, to wit:(1) Related Literature and (2) Related Studies. If no studies were included due to their non-availability, it is so stated in the introductory part of the chapter, and the chapter’s heading is modified to “REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE” only.
  • 22. 22 RELATED LITERATURE  The introductory paragraph under this main topical component merely enumerates the topical sections by subject areas that are to be covered in it. Organization of the Topical Section under the Related Literature Component  Each topical section is organized according to the subject area or variables that is related to each of the sub-problem under investigation. However, some thesis-dissertation writers prefer to use each author’s name as a section heading and to discuss
  • 23. 23 therein as many variables or subject areas which each author has expounded on. While others do away entirely with the topical sections, they merely narrate one after the other the cited authority- sources’ expositions on several variables or dimensional aspects, with no topical divisions whatsoever. The advantage of organizing the discussion around a topical conceptual scheme or variable is to provide a clear delineation among the various variables and aspects under investigation for a more illuminating and comprehensive background of explored facts and information that can help enrich the research design of the study.
  • 24. 24 Nature and Purpose of the Review NATURE. The review on related literature embodies the cited theories, principles, concepts, Facts, ideas and views regarding the pertinent variables or aspects as gleaned from books, research journals, monographs, and other scholarly publications perused by the researcher when searching for a research problem for the study. Many other reference sources are to be availed of by the researcher for the review. These are to be critically appraised to determine which ones are worthy of inclusion in the review section.
  • 25. 25 PURPOSE The main purpose of the related literature review is to provide the thesis writer with the theoretical background of information on what is already known on the area of interest and what still needs to be done for his research undertaking. It furnishes him with ample research possibilities by which to expand, modify, and/or improve parts of his planned study to make it more novel and noteworthy. It also opens up avenues of rich ideas to the reader who may be interested in undertaking a similar project for his own study or for some other purposes.
  • 26. 26 Essentials in Developing the Content Domain of Each of the Topical Section under the Related Literature Component Discussed hereunder are the guidelines to be considered when developing the topical sections under the related literature component: Cited views of authority-sources. Expounded under each topical section are the cited views and expositions of well-known authors, scientists, theorists, psychologists, and experts on the subject areas or variables that are related to the research problem. Their respective theories, concepts, and informational facts on the subject are compared, contrasted, and critically analyzed in relation to another and to the research problem itself. The cited paraphrased ideas or quoted statements of such authors serve as the core of discussion under each topical section. Care, however, must be exercised to insure that the whole component presentation is not mere series of quoted or paraphrased paragraphs of cited authority-sources.
  • 27. 27 Significance and relevance of the review to the study itself. While extensive readings on related literature may have been undertaken by the researcher, yet only the very significant highly relevant ones are cited and discussed in the chapter on elated literature. The significance and meaning of the explored areas of knowledge are explained in terms of the specific insights that can help improve the research design of his study. A synthesized summary at the end of the “Related Literature” component is deemed essential to show how the explored areas are related to one another and how each contribute to the improvement of the planned problem area and variables of the study.
  • 28. 28 Tips on Structuring Literature Reviews A common error in literature reviews is for writers to present materials from one author, followed by information from another, then another… The way in which you group authors and link ideas will help avoid this problem. To group authors who draw similar conclusions, you can use linking words such as: • also • additionally • again • similarly When authors disagree, linking words that indicate contrast will show how you have analysed their work. Words such as: • however • conversely • on the other hand • nonetheless will indicate to your reader how you have analysed the material.
  • 29. 29 At other times you may want to qualify an author’s work (using such words as specifically, usually or generally) or use an example (thus, namely, to illustrate). In this way you ensure that you are synthesising the material, not just describing the work already carried out in your field.
  • 30. Related Studies 30 • Embodied under this main topical component are:  the cited studies of thesis-dissertation authors and others who have conducted researches abroad and in the Philippines. Its organization and other essentials are presented next to guide the thesis- dissertation writer when he works on this component
  • 31. Organization of the Related Studies’ Component 31 • Studies Abroad • Studies in the Philippines Nature and Purpose of the Review Nature---Discussed under “Studies Abroad” and “Studies in the Philippines” are cited completed studies’ research problems and findings, including some other noteworthy and unique research designs, conclusions, and/or recommendations.
  • 32. 32 Purpose The purposes of the related studies’ review section are to provide an overview and assessment of the merits and/or shortcomings of previous research investigations out of which ideas can be generated on probable research dimensions that may be included or modified in the contemplated study.
  • 33. 33 Chapter 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY This chapter commences with a brief statement enumerating the main topics that are to be covered in it; namely: Research Design and Research Procedure. RESEARCH DESIGN This section briefly describe the types of research method(s) used. Depending on the nature and purpose of the study, any one of the following research methods may be availed of: descriptive, correlational, causal-comparative, historical, experimental, quasi-experimental, and/or special types such as ethnographic or biblical research.
  • 34. Locale of the Study 34 This section describes in brief the place where the study was conducted and the rationale behind its choice. A map showing the exact location in relation to the community and its neighboring towns is included if the same has not been included under the topical component, “DEFINITION OF TERMS,” when the research locale was described. Respondents of the Study Discussed in this section are the population of interest and the sampling of subjects used in the study.
  • 35. 35 Sample and Sampling Technique This section describes in detail the sampling procedure used in the choice of the subjects for the study. Its purpose is to show how the sample group(s) was selected and whether it is representative of the population of interest. Research Instrument The details on the research instrument(s) that was used are described in this section. Its nature, purpose, construction, content-validation, pre-testing, and rationale for its use are explained. Tests and research instruments that are standardized are preferred over self-constructed ones as the former have already been nation-wide and are universally accepted for public consumption and commercial use.
  • 36. 36 Statistical tool This section describes the statistical tool(s) used in interpreting the data gathered if the research is quantitative research. Data Gathering Procedure This main component contains the step-by-step procedure used in the administration of the research or experimental instrument(s) for the study. It covers more or less, the following: 1. Securing permission to conduct the study or the experiment. The approved letter of request is attached as an appendix to the researcher’ manuscript; 2. Orienting the respondents or the subjects on the purpose of the study and instructing them how to accomplish the instruments or tests. Questions raised, if any, are duly answered;
  • 37. 37 3. Administering the research instrument(s) or conducting the experiment within a specified time frame; 4. Retrieving the duly accomplished research or achievemen test data for statistical treatment and analysis
  • 38. 38 References:  1. Sanchez, Luz B. DEVELOPING THE CONTENT DOMAIN OF THE PERTINENT CHAPTERS OF A RESEARCH PROPOSAL, compiled by: Dr. ARMIA U.EBRAHIM  2. Language Research lectures and notes, compiled by Riceli Mendoza,Ph.D. (in Applied Linguistics)
  • 39. 39 The End for Listening
  • 40. 40