Protection and immunity under Cybersecurity Information Sharing ActDavid Sweigert
This document provides guidance for non-federal entities on sharing cyber threat indicators and defensive measures with federal entities under the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015. It defines key terms like cyber threat indicator, defensive measure, and information protected by privacy laws. It also explains how non-federal entities can share indicators and measures through the Department of Homeland Security's Automated Indicator Sharing system or other means. The document aims to help non-federal entities properly share information for cybersecurity purposes while protecting privacy.
DHHS ASPR Cybersecurity Threat Information ResourcesDavid Sweigert
This document provides a summary of resources on cybersecurity for the healthcare sector. It begins with an introduction noting the increased risk of cyberattacks against healthcare organizations and the need for improved cybersecurity practices. The resources are then categorized and include topics such as best practices for incident response, risk assessments, training, and legal/regulatory guidance. The document aims to help healthcare stakeholders better protect against, respond to, and recover from cyber threats.
PYA Principal Barry Mathis presented “The IT Analysis Paralysis,” in which attendees:
Received a compressive review of the many IT frameworks that can be used to develop effective internal audit programs.
Learned the differences between commercial, federal, and industry frameworks.
Received tips, tools, and techniques for creating an effective framework based on risk assessment and identified risks.
The document discusses upcoming FFIEC cybersecurity assessments for financial institutions and provides guidance. It notes that cybersecurity is essentially the same as information security, focusing on protecting digital data and infrastructure. It advises that institutions with a robust information security program in place addressing risk assessment and management will likely pass the cybersecurity assessments after some minor enhancements. The document provides an overview of frameworks like NIST's Cybersecurity Framework that can help institutions refine their programs to prepare.
Whitepaper | Cyber resilience in the age of digital transformationNexon Asia Pacific
We are living in an always-on world using different communications devices, systems and networks. As privacy and protecting one’s identity is becoming increasingly important, the task of protecting these devices, systems and networks from cyber attack is no longer an option, it is a necessity.
This document provides an overview of various cyber threats including cyber attack, cyber espionage, cybercrime, and cyber terrorism. It defines key terms like "cyber attack" and "cyber adversary". The document discusses how Australia remains a target of cyber espionage from foreign states seeking strategic, operational, and commercial intelligence. Cybercrime like ransomware and credential theft pose an ongoing threat. While terrorist cyber capabilities are currently limited, cyberspace presents opportunities for terrorist groups to develop more sophisticated techniques over time.
Protection and immunity under Cybersecurity Information Sharing ActDavid Sweigert
This document provides guidance for non-federal entities on sharing cyber threat indicators and defensive measures with federal entities under the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015. It defines key terms like cyber threat indicator, defensive measure, and information protected by privacy laws. It also explains how non-federal entities can share indicators and measures through the Department of Homeland Security's Automated Indicator Sharing system or other means. The document aims to help non-federal entities properly share information for cybersecurity purposes while protecting privacy.
DHHS ASPR Cybersecurity Threat Information ResourcesDavid Sweigert
This document provides a summary of resources on cybersecurity for the healthcare sector. It begins with an introduction noting the increased risk of cyberattacks against healthcare organizations and the need for improved cybersecurity practices. The resources are then categorized and include topics such as best practices for incident response, risk assessments, training, and legal/regulatory guidance. The document aims to help healthcare stakeholders better protect against, respond to, and recover from cyber threats.
PYA Principal Barry Mathis presented “The IT Analysis Paralysis,” in which attendees:
Received a compressive review of the many IT frameworks that can be used to develop effective internal audit programs.
Learned the differences between commercial, federal, and industry frameworks.
Received tips, tools, and techniques for creating an effective framework based on risk assessment and identified risks.
The document discusses upcoming FFIEC cybersecurity assessments for financial institutions and provides guidance. It notes that cybersecurity is essentially the same as information security, focusing on protecting digital data and infrastructure. It advises that institutions with a robust information security program in place addressing risk assessment and management will likely pass the cybersecurity assessments after some minor enhancements. The document provides an overview of frameworks like NIST's Cybersecurity Framework that can help institutions refine their programs to prepare.
Whitepaper | Cyber resilience in the age of digital transformationNexon Asia Pacific
We are living in an always-on world using different communications devices, systems and networks. As privacy and protecting one’s identity is becoming increasingly important, the task of protecting these devices, systems and networks from cyber attack is no longer an option, it is a necessity.
This document provides an overview of various cyber threats including cyber attack, cyber espionage, cybercrime, and cyber terrorism. It defines key terms like "cyber attack" and "cyber adversary". The document discusses how Australia remains a target of cyber espionage from foreign states seeking strategic, operational, and commercial intelligence. Cybercrime like ransomware and credential theft pose an ongoing threat. While terrorist cyber capabilities are currently limited, cyberspace presents opportunities for terrorist groups to develop more sophisticated techniques over time.
The National Cyber Security Policy 2013 aims to protect India's public and private infrastructure from cyber attacks. It establishes a framework for improving cyber security through strategies like creating a secure cyber ecosystem, strengthening regulatory frameworks, promoting research and development, and reducing supply chain risks. Key objectives include generating trust in IT systems, protecting critical infrastructure and information, and developing workforce skills in cyber security.
The Best Articles of 2016 DEVELOPING AND CONNECTING CYBERSECURITY LEADERS GLO...at MicroFocus Italy ❖✔
Article: Crypto Wars II
By Luther Martin – ISSA member, Silicon Valley Chapter
and Amy Vosters
The debate over whether or not to give US law
enforcement officials the ability to decrypt encrypted
messaging has recently been revisited after a twentyyear
break. The results may be surprising.
The document provides legal disclaimers and information about sustainable cybersecurity practices. It discusses starting cybersecurity at the administration level by making it cultural rather than technical, based on needs rather than vendor features, iterative and continuous. It also discusses establishing a data protection steering committee and reducing reliance on people by ensuring responsibilities are understood and policies and processes are documented. The document provides recommendations on cybersecurity frameworks, controls, and best practices.
NASCIO Cyber Disruption Response and RecoveryDavid Sweigert
Here are some key executive sponsors that would be critical to the success of a cyber disruption response plan:
- Governor - As the chief executive of the state, the Governor provides overall leadership and accountability for ensuring the state is prepared to respond to cyber disruptions. The Governor's support is crucial for securing necessary resources and authority.
- State Chief Information Officer (CIO) - The CIO leads the state's IT operations and security programs. They are well positioned to coordinate cybersecurity efforts across agencies and work closely with emergency management on response planning.
- State Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) - The CISO oversees the state's cybersecurity posture and risk management. They can help drive development of the response plan and
This document summarizes the results of a survey of federal Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) on the state of cybersecurity from their perspective. Key findings include:
1) CISOs see greater national awareness of cybersecurity issues but still lack sufficient resources to fully address threats.
2) While security tools and training are improving, threats and attacks are also increasing.
3) CISOs face evolving responsibilities beyond technical issues to include management, policy, and political roles.
4) CISOs rely on well-trained staff but need more funding, clear mandates, and operational support from agencies.
The Common Good Digital Framework (CGDF) is a proposed campaign and platform to monitor violations of ethical values and standards related to artificial intelligence, personal data, cyber security, and digital activity by governments and large organizations. The CGDF will focus on issues like AI bias, privacy, and cyber security, and will generate policy recommendations in response to identified problems. It will utilize partners, advisors, and social media to distribute its findings and recommendations in order to influence policymaking and encourage corrective actions. The goal is to establish new ethical norms and regulations to help guide digital progress for the benefit of all humanity.
This document discusses best practices for cybersecurity policy and governance in government organizations. It emphasizes the importance of aligning security policies with business objectives to enable operations rather than hinder them. Effective risk management requires identifying critical assets, analyzing threats and vulnerabilities, and understanding breach implications. It also stresses the need for strong executive support of security policies and constant policy refreshment as technologies change.
Rutkowski OASIS CTI F2F Cybersecurity Act Preso 20160115James Bryce Clark
Shared with permission from author. Analysis from individual members of OASIS, presented at a recent meeting of the OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence TC (the development platform for STIX/TAXII). Extracted from a broader set posted to: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cti/201601/msg00000/_cybersecurity_act_reference-model_1.1.pptx
This information is provided for information, but does not represent the output or official views of OASIS or its technical committees..
The document discusses how predictive cyber intelligence can help organizations stay ahead of both cyber and physical security threats. It notes that investigations often find warning signs were missed by conventional defenses. The challenge is for organizations to detect potential threats early through tools like predictive cyber intelligence, which uses software and hardware to monitor public information for pre-incident indicators. This allows businesses to contain threats before damage occurs, whereas reactive security measures only address threats after the fact. The document provides examples of both cyberattacks and physical security risks organizations face and argues that predictive cyber intelligence can add important depth to defensive strategies.
US Government Software Assurance and Security InitiativesiLindsey Landolfi
This document provides an overview of software assurance (SwA) initiatives within the US federal government. It discusses how the Department of Homeland Security established the National Cyber Security Division Software Assurance Program to promote software security, integrity, and resiliency. It also describes the development of a common measurement framework to help organizations implement security best practices throughout the software development lifecycle. Finally, it analyzes security risks and mitigation strategies for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems used in critical infrastructure through examples like the Stuxnet malware.
This document provides information about information governance standards and responsibilities in the NHS. It discusses key topics like the Caldicott principles for handling patient information, the Data Protection Act, Freedom of Information Act, and NHS Constitution. The main points are that everyone in the NHS has a responsibility to maintain confidentiality and handle information securely and ethically according to legal and best practice standards. This includes following guidelines on access, disclosure, records management, staff training, and reporting security breaches.
This document provides an overview of securing healthcare networks. It discusses:
1. The need for healthcare organizations to develop a formal security policy and assess their network for vulnerabilities.
2. Common network security threats facing healthcare such as ransomware, hacking, and insider threats.
3. The costs of security breaches and benefits of a secure network such as improved patient care and mobility.
Zlatibor risk based balancing of organizational and technical controls for ...Dejan Jeremic
This document discusses the importance of balancing organizational and technical controls for effective information security. It argues that a risk-based approach is needed to properly balance these controls. Organizational controls, like security policies and employee training, are important for addressing human and insider threats. While technical controls help manage technological vulnerabilities, both types of controls are needed. A risk-based approach identifies the most critical assets and processes to focus protection efforts. This balancing of controls based on risk can help maximize the effectiveness of an organization's information security management system.
The document describes VIYYA Technologies' Integrated Safety and Security Management System (SSMS). The SSMS provides organizations with an integrated platform for safety and security planning, preparation, training, response and recovery through features like emergency notification, crisis management tools, eLearning, and reporting. The SSMS helps create a culture of preparedness across organizations and enables effective communication and collaboration before, during and after crises or emergencies.
This is my attempt to summarize the policy with salient points. For detailed verbose policy please visit http://deity.gov.in/hindi/sites/upload_files/dithindi/files/ncsp_060411.pdf
This document outlines a lecture on legal aspects of health informatics. It begins by discussing different types of legal systems such as civil law and common law. It then covers laws related to informatics including computer crimes laws, intellectual property laws, and health privacy laws. A significant portion of the document focuses on explaining the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, which established national standards for electronic health information in the United States to protect individuals' medical records and other personal health information.
Michigan has become a leader in cybersecurity through collaborative public-private partnerships and initiatives launched since 2011 as part of the Michigan Cyber Initiative. Key accomplishments include the michigan.gov/cybersecurity website, two cybersecurity conferences, breakfast and luncheon series, the Michigan Cyber Command Center, Michigan Cyber Range partnership with Merit Network, and the Michigan Intelligence Operations Center. The document outlines continued goals such as increasing cybersecurity jobs and training, exercises, awareness programs, and economic development partnerships to maintain Michigan's position as a cybersecurity leader.
This white paper discusses cyber security predictions and trends for the next 18 months. It outlines 5 trends: 1) major mobile exploits due to increased mobility and devices, 2) open source vulnerabilities as adversaries target these, 3) supply chain attacks remaining critical as vendors are easier targets, 4) increased industry-specific attacks and malware, and 5) greater privacy legislation in response to public concerns about data collection. The paper recommends organizations assess their use of open source software, supply chain security policies, industry-specific defenses, and data privacy practices to address these evolving threats.
Protect and Grow Public Report May 2016Rob Blackwell
The document presents a strategic plan from the Michigan Defense Center to protect and grow Michigan's defense and homeland security economy. It was developed with input from an executive council, governance board, and advisory committee. It summarizes Michigan's history as the "Arsenal of Democracy" during WWII and its ongoing contributions to national security through facilities like the Detroit Arsenal and 110th Attack Wing in Battle Creek. The plan was created by the Matrix Design Group and Roosevelt Group consulting firms to make recommendations to guide Michigan's future investments in supporting the military and national security industries.
This webinar will explain how healthcare professionals can use social media to communicate with patients while complying with privacy and security regulations. It will discuss the risks of using social media in healthcare settings and how to avoid HIPAA violations. Attendees will learn best practices for social media policies and documentation, as well as lessons from social media compliance audits. The webinar will cover social media trends, compliance requirements, violation examples, and policy implementation.
HEALTHCARE IT: IS YOUR INFORMATION AT RISK? IJNSA Journal
Healthcare Information Technology (IT) has made great advances over the past few years and while these advances have enable healthcare professionals to provide higher quality healthcare to a larger number of individuals it also provides the criminal element more opportunities to access sensitive information, such as patient protected health information (PHI) and Personal identification Information (PII). Having an Information Assurance (IA) programallows for the protection of information and information systems andensures the organization is in compliance with all requires regulations, laws and directive is essential. While most organizations have such a policy in place, often it is inadequate to ensure the proper protection to prevent security breaches. The increase of data breaches in the last few years demonstrates the importance of an effective IA program. To ensure an effective IA policy, the
policy must manage the operational risk, including identifying risks, assessment and mitigation of identified risks and ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance.
The National Cyber Security Policy 2013 aims to protect India's public and private infrastructure from cyber attacks. It establishes a framework for improving cyber security through strategies like creating a secure cyber ecosystem, strengthening regulatory frameworks, promoting research and development, and reducing supply chain risks. Key objectives include generating trust in IT systems, protecting critical infrastructure and information, and developing workforce skills in cyber security.
The Best Articles of 2016 DEVELOPING AND CONNECTING CYBERSECURITY LEADERS GLO...at MicroFocus Italy ❖✔
Article: Crypto Wars II
By Luther Martin – ISSA member, Silicon Valley Chapter
and Amy Vosters
The debate over whether or not to give US law
enforcement officials the ability to decrypt encrypted
messaging has recently been revisited after a twentyyear
break. The results may be surprising.
The document provides legal disclaimers and information about sustainable cybersecurity practices. It discusses starting cybersecurity at the administration level by making it cultural rather than technical, based on needs rather than vendor features, iterative and continuous. It also discusses establishing a data protection steering committee and reducing reliance on people by ensuring responsibilities are understood and policies and processes are documented. The document provides recommendations on cybersecurity frameworks, controls, and best practices.
NASCIO Cyber Disruption Response and RecoveryDavid Sweigert
Here are some key executive sponsors that would be critical to the success of a cyber disruption response plan:
- Governor - As the chief executive of the state, the Governor provides overall leadership and accountability for ensuring the state is prepared to respond to cyber disruptions. The Governor's support is crucial for securing necessary resources and authority.
- State Chief Information Officer (CIO) - The CIO leads the state's IT operations and security programs. They are well positioned to coordinate cybersecurity efforts across agencies and work closely with emergency management on response planning.
- State Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) - The CISO oversees the state's cybersecurity posture and risk management. They can help drive development of the response plan and
This document summarizes the results of a survey of federal Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) on the state of cybersecurity from their perspective. Key findings include:
1) CISOs see greater national awareness of cybersecurity issues but still lack sufficient resources to fully address threats.
2) While security tools and training are improving, threats and attacks are also increasing.
3) CISOs face evolving responsibilities beyond technical issues to include management, policy, and political roles.
4) CISOs rely on well-trained staff but need more funding, clear mandates, and operational support from agencies.
The Common Good Digital Framework (CGDF) is a proposed campaign and platform to monitor violations of ethical values and standards related to artificial intelligence, personal data, cyber security, and digital activity by governments and large organizations. The CGDF will focus on issues like AI bias, privacy, and cyber security, and will generate policy recommendations in response to identified problems. It will utilize partners, advisors, and social media to distribute its findings and recommendations in order to influence policymaking and encourage corrective actions. The goal is to establish new ethical norms and regulations to help guide digital progress for the benefit of all humanity.
This document discusses best practices for cybersecurity policy and governance in government organizations. It emphasizes the importance of aligning security policies with business objectives to enable operations rather than hinder them. Effective risk management requires identifying critical assets, analyzing threats and vulnerabilities, and understanding breach implications. It also stresses the need for strong executive support of security policies and constant policy refreshment as technologies change.
Rutkowski OASIS CTI F2F Cybersecurity Act Preso 20160115James Bryce Clark
Shared with permission from author. Analysis from individual members of OASIS, presented at a recent meeting of the OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence TC (the development platform for STIX/TAXII). Extracted from a broader set posted to: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cti/201601/msg00000/_cybersecurity_act_reference-model_1.1.pptx
This information is provided for information, but does not represent the output or official views of OASIS or its technical committees..
The document discusses how predictive cyber intelligence can help organizations stay ahead of both cyber and physical security threats. It notes that investigations often find warning signs were missed by conventional defenses. The challenge is for organizations to detect potential threats early through tools like predictive cyber intelligence, which uses software and hardware to monitor public information for pre-incident indicators. This allows businesses to contain threats before damage occurs, whereas reactive security measures only address threats after the fact. The document provides examples of both cyberattacks and physical security risks organizations face and argues that predictive cyber intelligence can add important depth to defensive strategies.
US Government Software Assurance and Security InitiativesiLindsey Landolfi
This document provides an overview of software assurance (SwA) initiatives within the US federal government. It discusses how the Department of Homeland Security established the National Cyber Security Division Software Assurance Program to promote software security, integrity, and resiliency. It also describes the development of a common measurement framework to help organizations implement security best practices throughout the software development lifecycle. Finally, it analyzes security risks and mitigation strategies for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems used in critical infrastructure through examples like the Stuxnet malware.
This document provides information about information governance standards and responsibilities in the NHS. It discusses key topics like the Caldicott principles for handling patient information, the Data Protection Act, Freedom of Information Act, and NHS Constitution. The main points are that everyone in the NHS has a responsibility to maintain confidentiality and handle information securely and ethically according to legal and best practice standards. This includes following guidelines on access, disclosure, records management, staff training, and reporting security breaches.
This document provides an overview of securing healthcare networks. It discusses:
1. The need for healthcare organizations to develop a formal security policy and assess their network for vulnerabilities.
2. Common network security threats facing healthcare such as ransomware, hacking, and insider threats.
3. The costs of security breaches and benefits of a secure network such as improved patient care and mobility.
Zlatibor risk based balancing of organizational and technical controls for ...Dejan Jeremic
This document discusses the importance of balancing organizational and technical controls for effective information security. It argues that a risk-based approach is needed to properly balance these controls. Organizational controls, like security policies and employee training, are important for addressing human and insider threats. While technical controls help manage technological vulnerabilities, both types of controls are needed. A risk-based approach identifies the most critical assets and processes to focus protection efforts. This balancing of controls based on risk can help maximize the effectiveness of an organization's information security management system.
The document describes VIYYA Technologies' Integrated Safety and Security Management System (SSMS). The SSMS provides organizations with an integrated platform for safety and security planning, preparation, training, response and recovery through features like emergency notification, crisis management tools, eLearning, and reporting. The SSMS helps create a culture of preparedness across organizations and enables effective communication and collaboration before, during and after crises or emergencies.
This is my attempt to summarize the policy with salient points. For detailed verbose policy please visit http://deity.gov.in/hindi/sites/upload_files/dithindi/files/ncsp_060411.pdf
This document outlines a lecture on legal aspects of health informatics. It begins by discussing different types of legal systems such as civil law and common law. It then covers laws related to informatics including computer crimes laws, intellectual property laws, and health privacy laws. A significant portion of the document focuses on explaining the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, which established national standards for electronic health information in the United States to protect individuals' medical records and other personal health information.
Michigan has become a leader in cybersecurity through collaborative public-private partnerships and initiatives launched since 2011 as part of the Michigan Cyber Initiative. Key accomplishments include the michigan.gov/cybersecurity website, two cybersecurity conferences, breakfast and luncheon series, the Michigan Cyber Command Center, Michigan Cyber Range partnership with Merit Network, and the Michigan Intelligence Operations Center. The document outlines continued goals such as increasing cybersecurity jobs and training, exercises, awareness programs, and economic development partnerships to maintain Michigan's position as a cybersecurity leader.
This white paper discusses cyber security predictions and trends for the next 18 months. It outlines 5 trends: 1) major mobile exploits due to increased mobility and devices, 2) open source vulnerabilities as adversaries target these, 3) supply chain attacks remaining critical as vendors are easier targets, 4) increased industry-specific attacks and malware, and 5) greater privacy legislation in response to public concerns about data collection. The paper recommends organizations assess their use of open source software, supply chain security policies, industry-specific defenses, and data privacy practices to address these evolving threats.
Protect and Grow Public Report May 2016Rob Blackwell
The document presents a strategic plan from the Michigan Defense Center to protect and grow Michigan's defense and homeland security economy. It was developed with input from an executive council, governance board, and advisory committee. It summarizes Michigan's history as the "Arsenal of Democracy" during WWII and its ongoing contributions to national security through facilities like the Detroit Arsenal and 110th Attack Wing in Battle Creek. The plan was created by the Matrix Design Group and Roosevelt Group consulting firms to make recommendations to guide Michigan's future investments in supporting the military and national security industries.
This webinar will explain how healthcare professionals can use social media to communicate with patients while complying with privacy and security regulations. It will discuss the risks of using social media in healthcare settings and how to avoid HIPAA violations. Attendees will learn best practices for social media policies and documentation, as well as lessons from social media compliance audits. The webinar will cover social media trends, compliance requirements, violation examples, and policy implementation.
HEALTHCARE IT: IS YOUR INFORMATION AT RISK? IJNSA Journal
Healthcare Information Technology (IT) has made great advances over the past few years and while these advances have enable healthcare professionals to provide higher quality healthcare to a larger number of individuals it also provides the criminal element more opportunities to access sensitive information, such as patient protected health information (PHI) and Personal identification Information (PII). Having an Information Assurance (IA) programallows for the protection of information and information systems andensures the organization is in compliance with all requires regulations, laws and directive is essential. While most organizations have such a policy in place, often it is inadequate to ensure the proper protection to prevent security breaches. The increase of data breaches in the last few years demonstrates the importance of an effective IA program. To ensure an effective IA policy, the
policy must manage the operational risk, including identifying risks, assessment and mitigation of identified risks and ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance.
Chapter 1-3 - Information Assurance Basics.pptx.pdfkimangeloullero
The document provides an overview of information assurance concepts and strategies. It discusses developing an information assurance strategy based on 10 core principles including being comprehensive, independent, compliant with legal requirements, and risk-based. It also covers information assurance concepts such as the CIA triad of confidentiality, integrity and availability, and defense-in-depth approach using segmentation and multiple layers of security controls. The document emphasizes that information assurance is important for protecting critical assets, meeting compliance requirements, and gaining a competitive advantage.
Cyber Critical Infrastructure Framework PanelPaul Di Gangi
The following presentation slides were used during the 2014 Cyber Summit Panel Session on Cyber Critical Infrastructure Guidelines at the University of Alabama at Birmingham
The Role of Information Security Policy Jessica Graf Assignment 1 Unit 8 IAS5020Jessica Graf
The document discusses the importance of developing an information security policy that balances security needs with business goals. It explains that a policy should be based on assessing risks and regulations while protecting assets like data, networks, and reputation. A good policy also considers factors like budget, priorities, and how security could impact customers. The goal is to implement controls that cost-effectively mitigate risks through confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information.
Information Systems Security & StrategyTony Hauxwell
This document discusses information security strategies and the importance of protecting sensitive data. It defines an information security strategy as a set of procedures and policies to protect information assets from being lost, stolen or compromised. The core concepts of confidentiality, integrity and availability underpin security strategies and regulations. The document examines techniques for implementing security strategies, including identifying risks and complying with standards to ensure protection of information.
Data and Network Security: What You Need to KnowPYA, P.C.
PYA Principal Barry Mathis served on a panel discussion at the American Medical Informatics Association iHealth 2017 Clinical Informatics Conference.
The panel explored the state of cybersecurity in healthcare organizations and related legal considerations, including the HIPAA privacy and security rules. It considered institutional preparedness, provided examples, and offered preventive measures. The panel also discussed ransomware attacks, including tactics for negotiating with hackers, and provided best practices for organizations to avoid such attacks.
An Overview of the Major Compliance RequirementsDoubleHorn
In this blog, we will explore some of the US government’s compliance standards that are helpful for many federal, state and local agencies while procuring technology and related services.
Healthcare Security by Senior Security Consultant Lennart BredbergLennart Bredberg
This document discusses security issues and solutions for healthcare facilities. It outlines Bearing's model for integrated healthcare security that treats security as a core management process. Top security concerns include protecting patients, employees, visitors, and high-risk areas like infant units and pharmacies. Effectively managing security requires a holistic, systematic approach that converges information and physical security through proper management systems, safety culture, and incident reporting. Technology must support trained staff to securely meet expectations for quality healthcare, safety, and privacy.
This document discusses security issues and solutions for healthcare facilities. It outlines Bearing's model for integrated healthcare security that treats security as a core management process. Top security concerns include protecting patients, employees, visitors, and high-risk areas like infant units and pharmacies. Effectively managing security requires a holistic, systematic approach that converges information and physical security through proper training, technology, and treating security as a business process rather than an isolated function.
Cyb 690 cybersecurity program template directions the follAISHA232980
This document provides an overview of some of the key legal and ethical challenges related to cybersecurity. It discusses how organizations have an ethical responsibility to protect user data from hackers. When data breaches do occur, organizations are often partially at fault for not adequately protecting information. The document also discusses the importance of building and maintaining trust with employees. It notes that employees should feel comfortable reporting any wrongdoing through appropriate whistleblowing channels. Finally, it mentions some of the trade-offs that must be considered when addressing these challenges, such as privacy versus security and individual rights versus public safety.
The document discusses questions regarding a healthcare system's vendor selection process for an IT project. It recommends the types of information an organization should provide to vendors in a Request for Information (RFI) and gather from vendors in the early planning stages. This includes vendor background, technical requirements, functionality, implementation processes, and training. An RFP with more specific details is issued to a select few vendors.
This document provides a three-step plan for healthcare providers to strengthen cybersecurity:
1) Conduct a cybersecurity risk assessment to identify vulnerabilities
2) Purchase cyber insurance to transfer some risks and costs of breaches
3) Consider moving data and IT services to a qualified cloud provider that specializes in healthcare security and compliance. Outsourcing to an experienced cloud provider can improve capabilities while potentially reducing long-term costs compared to maintaining IT systems in-house.
The document discusses cybersecurity and Techwave's approach. It notes that cyber attacks are a threat to businesses and their privacy. Techwave provides cybersecurity tools and technologies to help organizations stay protected. Their solutions include a defense-in-depth strategy with multiple security layers, digital certificates for authentication, and comprehensive security assessments and plans. Techwave aims to maintain data security, manage risks, avoid breaches, and ensure compliance.
Cyber-attacks are an alarming threat to all types of businesses & organizations.The risk of a cyber-attack is not just a risk to your company but also to your privacy.Hence, cybersecurity is crucial for every business. Cybersecurity protects critical data from cyber attackers. This includes sensitive data, governmental and industry information, personal information, personally identifiable information (PII), intellectual property, and protected health information (PHI). If you are looking for tools to fight against cyber threats, then Techwave’s tools & technologies with adequate controls will help your organization stay protected.
The document discusses leveraging control-based risk management frameworks to support HIPAA compliant risk analysis. It introduces the HITRUST CSF framework, which consolidates controls from various standards like NIST, ISO, and HIPAA to provide a comprehensive set of security controls. Performing a risk analysis and selecting controls based on this framework allows organizations to meet requirements from multiple regulations and standards in a simplified way. The framework also supports assessing security controls once and reporting results to various oversight entities.
Assimilation Of Security-Related Policies In U.S. Firms An Empirical Study O...Angie Miller
This study examines the assimilation of security-related policies in U.S. firms, with a focus on how web assimilation and related knowledge impact policy adoption. The researchers surveyed over 500 organizations about their assimilation of policies like acceptable use, security, privacy, business continuity, and disaster recovery plans. They analyze how an organization's web strategy, web-based business activities, and security-related knowledge predict greater assimilation of protective policies. The goal is to understand what drives organizations to adopt comprehensive security measures beyond just technologies.
A Research Project PresentationOnline Policies for Enabling Fi.docxmakdul
A Research Project Presentation
Online Policies for Enabling Financial Companies to Manage Privacy Issues
NAME:
Course:
1
Introduction
Companies in the financial sector handle data that are priority for hackers.
Organizations invest in vast technologies for protecting the data from unauthorized access.
However, they do not adequately invest in behavioral measures for safeguarding the data.
Companies in the financial sector face numerous attempts by the cybercriminals who target stealing data stored in the systems. The corporations handle confidential data that could be used for committing crimes, such as impersonation and illegal transfer of money (Noor & Hassan, 2019). It is a major concern whether financial institutions have effective policies that ensure the data are properly secured from both internal and external threats. Financial companies, especially those that spread across the country have always focused on investing in technologies that promote the privacy of the data and the systems. They are deploying technologies, such as cloud computing, which promote the privacy of the data. Also, they use Bcrypt technologies to encrypt data via algorithms that will take hackers decades to decrypt a single password. Though they invest in such technologies that cost millions of dollars, there are questions whether they invest in behavioral measures to protect the data systems (Noor & Hassan, 2019). Such measures require the use of online policies that will ensure that internal and the external users can adhere to best practices that make them less vulnerable to attacks, especially the social engineering attacks that target unsuspecting users.
2
Literature Review
Financial companies have implemented policies for promoting desirable user behaviors.
They provide guidelines on how to use the networks.
They do not require the users to follow strict rules, which indicates the inefficiency of the policies.
Financial companies have implemented policies on how customers access their data remotely. Such policies outline the standards that customers must follow such as the multi-factor authentication, which aims at ensuring that no unauthorized users access the data (Suchitra &Vandana, 2016). The policies are communicated to the customers when they provide their data. It is an effective approach that mainly ensures that customer must follow certain guidelines that promote the overall security of the data. However, Timothy Toohey (2014) questions whether the policies apply to the side of the users who are very likely to exhibit behaviors that expose data to threats. For instance, the customers may use devices that have weak antimalware tools. Such devices create an avenue that a hacker can use and access the system.
3
Research Method
The researcher will employ a case-study design.
It means that the researcher will focus on individual cases and analyze them.
Interviews and observation will be the primary tools of data.
The da.
Running head POLICIES FOR MANAGING PRIVACY1POLICIES FOR M.docxjeanettehully
Running head: POLICIES FOR MANAGING PRIVACY
1
POLICIES FOR MANAGING PRIVACY
5
Online Policies for Enabling Financial Companies to Manage Privacy Issues
Name: Sunil Kumar Parisa
Date:03/29/2020
University of Cumberland’s
ABSTRACT
Financial companies are under constant threats in the face of cyber-attacks, which are growing by the day. The companies usually implement measures that primarily focus on the deployment of technologies for suppressing the attacks. They do not consider user policies as essential elements that help curb the vulnerabilities. The policies put in place have a low level of enforceability, which lowers the impact of the plans. The research project will determine the relationship between policy enforceability and the vulnerabilities posed to a system by the internal and external users.
INTRODUCTION
Business companies in the financial sector have the responsibility of ensuring the data that belong to the customers are fully protected. Cyber-crimes are on the rise, and the approaches employed today are not entirely practical. Technological tools and measures are not efficient. They should be complemented by the behavioral standards that suppress the vulnerabilities in all the IT domains (Vincent, Higgs & Pinsker, 2015). Enforceable policies will ensure there is an integration of behavioral and technological measures for promoting data security and privacy.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Financial companies usually emphasize policies that guide the collection of customer and storage as well as access to the data by the internal and external users. These policies are relevant as they promote best practices at both levels. The companies have a belief that these are the areas that need closer monitoring and evaluation. However, the policies put in place are not always enforceable. A lack of enforceability creates a situation where the desired outcomes are not realized (Yeganeh, 2019). It explains why data breaches are still experienced even after such policies are formulated and implemented.
RESEARCH METHOD
To investigate the relationship between enforceability of the policies and the vulnerabilities that business organizations are exposed to, a case study method will be used. It is an essential tool that helps determine a causal relationship (White & McBurney, 2012). Also, it will provide insights that will inform the recommendations that need to be considered by the multiple business organizations in the financial sector. Credible data that are free of confounding variables must be collected, analyzed, and inferences drawn. Two data collection procedures will be utilized as follows.
i. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted to collect diverse data on the design and implementation of user and online policies. The interviewees will offer data that expound on the security and privacy positions of the systems.
ii. Independent observations will be made to inform the behaviors of the users, both internally and externally. The observation ...
Running head POLICIES FOR MANAGING PRIVACY1POLICIES FOR M.docxglendar3
Running head: POLICIES FOR MANAGING PRIVACY
1
POLICIES FOR MANAGING PRIVACY
5
Online Policies for Enabling Financial Companies to Manage Privacy Issues
Name: Sunil Kumar Parisa
Date:03/29/2020
University of Cumberland’s
ABSTRACT
Financial companies are under constant threats in the face of cyber-attacks, which are growing by the day. The companies usually implement measures that primarily focus on the deployment of technologies for suppressing the attacks. They do not consider user policies as essential elements that help curb the vulnerabilities. The policies put in place have a low level of enforceability, which lowers the impact of the plans. The research project will determine the relationship between policy enforceability and the vulnerabilities posed to a system by the internal and external users.
INTRODUCTION
Business companies in the financial sector have the responsibility of ensuring the data that belong to the customers are fully protected. Cyber-crimes are on the rise, and the approaches employed today are not entirely practical. Technological tools and measures are not efficient. They should be complemented by the behavioral standards that suppress the vulnerabilities in all the IT domains (Vincent, Higgs & Pinsker, 2015). Enforceable policies will ensure there is an integration of behavioral and technological measures for promoting data security and privacy.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Financial companies usually emphasize policies that guide the collection of customer and storage as well as access to the data by the internal and external users. These policies are relevant as they promote best practices at both levels. The companies have a belief that these are the areas that need closer monitoring and evaluation. However, the policies put in place are not always enforceable. A lack of enforceability creates a situation where the desired outcomes are not realized (Yeganeh, 2019). It explains why data breaches are still experienced even after such policies are formulated and implemented.
RESEARCH METHOD
To investigate the relationship between enforceability of the policies and the vulnerabilities that business organizations are exposed to, a case study method will be used. It is an essential tool that helps determine a causal relationship (White & McBurney, 2012). Also, it will provide insights that will inform the recommendations that need to be considered by the multiple business organizations in the financial sector. Credible data that are free of confounding variables must be collected, analyzed, and inferences drawn. Two data collection procedures will be utilized as follows.
i. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted to collect diverse data on the design and implementation of user and online policies. The interviewees will offer data that expound on the security and privacy positions of the systems.
ii. Independent observations will be made to inform the behaviors of the users, both internally and externally. The observation.
Similar to HIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NIST (20)
This document provides guidance for state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) law enforcement on reporting cyber incidents to federal authorities. It outlines types of incidents that should be reported, such as those affecting critical infrastructure, national security, or public safety. The document details the information that should be included in reports, such as technical details about the incident and impacted systems. It also lists several ways for SLTT law enforcement to report incidents, including email, phone, or online portals, and specifies the federal agencies responsible for accepting different types of reports related to cybercrime, national infrastructure, or investigations.
Sample Network Analysis Report based on Wireshark AnalysisDavid Sweigert
This network analysis report examines a packet capture file containing traffic between two internal hosts downloading a file from a remote server. The analysis found that one internal host, with IP ending in 1.119, experienced significant packet loss during the download, as shown by drops in throughput and bursts of TCP errors. This packet loss indicates a potential failure at an infrastructure device, likely causing the observed retransmissions and degradation in performance. Further analysis of ingress traffic is needed to determine if the packet loss is occurring internally or externally to the network.
Department of Defense standard 8570 - CompTia Advanced Security Practitioner David Sweigert
This document provides notes for the CompTIA CASP exam, organized by exam domain:
1. Enterprise Security topics include placement of firewalls and other security appliances, SELinux mandatory access controls, storage area networks, encryption of multiple operating systems on a solid state drive, and TOCTOU attacks.
2. Risk Management and Incident Response domains cover risk terms.
3. Research and Analysis focuses on cryptographic concepts, enterprise storage technologies, and host and application security controls.
4. Integration of Computing, Communications and Business Disciplines addresses remote access and IPv6 issues.
5. Technical Integration of Enterprise Components involves application integration enablers.
National Cyber Security Awareness Month - October 2017David Sweigert
National Cyber Security Awareness Month is held each October to promote cybersecurity awareness and education. It is a collaborative effort between the Department of Homeland Security and private partners. There are 5 themes highlighted during the month - simple online safety steps, cybersecurity in the workplace, security of connected devices and the internet of things, cybersecurity careers, and protecting critical infrastructure. Each week focuses on one of these themes and provides resources to help organizations and individuals strengthen cybersecurity. The goal is to engage the public and encourage everyone to play a role in cybersecurity.
California Attorney General Notification Penal Code 646.9David Sweigert
This letter requests assistance from the California Attorney General's office for the District Attorney of San Luis Obispo County. It describes activities of an individual named Nathan Ames Stolpman who broadcasts livestreams on YouTube and videos on Patreon directing "crowd stalking" followers to target and harass private citizens by publishing their personal information. Stolpman issues "bounties" for photos of targeted individuals and provides their intended locations. The letter writer believes the District Attorney has not demonstrated a clear understanding of relevant privacy laws and requests the Attorney General's office provide technical assistance to the District Attorney regarding Stolpman's activities.
Congressional support of Ethical Hacking and Cyber SecurityDavid Sweigert
This House resolution expresses support for developing educational programs to better prepare students for cybersecurity careers by promoting ethical hacking skills. It notes the critical shortage of cybersecurity professionals and growing cyber threats facing the US. The resolution states that partnerships between industry, government and academia should collaborate to create programs, competitions and curricula giving students hands-on experience with in-demand cybersecurity skills like ethical hacking to help close this workforce gap.
Application of Racketeering Law to Suppress CrowdStalking ThreatsDavid Sweigert
This document discusses how racketeering and wire fraud laws can be used to combat hoax news sites that engage in "CrowdStalking" to distribute misinformation. These sites target critical infrastructure operators, federal employees, and security advisors. The document provides an example of how social engineering attacks can steal millions from a company. It argues that legal action against hoax news site operators can deter such attacks, and establishes criteria for when racketeering laws may apply to their activities, such as using deception for financial gain. The document identifies specific YouTube personalities like Nathan Stolpman and Jesse Moorefield who operate hoax news sites.
Port of Charleston evacuation case study: The cognitive threat of conspiracy ...David Sweigert
The document summarizes a study on how Live Action Role Play (LARP) simulations can create cognitive threat vectors using the example of two YouTube conspiracy theorists, Jason Goodman and George Webb. In June 2017, they created a sense of hysteria among their online fans by claiming a container ship was sailing into the Port of Charleston with a dirty bomb onboard, leading to the port's evacuation. The document argues this "crowdsourcing" format can weaponize sensationalized information and represents an emerging threat that critical infrastructure operators need to be aware of. It can potentially lead unwitting participants to engage in criminal acts or attacks in response to implied calls for action by the game's controllers.
Cyber Incident Response Team NIMS Public CommentDavid Sweigert
The Cyber Incident Response Team responds to cyber crises and threats. It is composed of 15 personnel including managers, analysts, specialists in areas like forensics and infrastructure. The team investigates incidents, uses mitigation approaches, and documents actions. It requires equipment like laptops, forensics tools, and communications devices and is deployable for up to 14 days.
Cyber Incident Response Team - NIMS - Public CommentDavid Sweigert
The Cyber Incident Response Team responds to cyber crises and threats. It is composed of 15 personnel including managers, analysts, specialists in areas like forensics and infrastructure. The team investigates incidents, uses mitigation approaches, and documents actions. It requires equipment like laptops, forensics tools, and communications devices and is deployable for up to 14 days.
National Incident Management System (NIMS) NQS DRAFTDavid Sweigert
The document provides guidance for a National Qualification System (NQS) to strengthen resource management under the National Incident Management System (NIMS). The NQS will define qualifications for emergency response personnel through common standards and certification processes to enhance coordination during multi-jurisdictional responses. It establishes guidelines for qualification criteria and processes, certification of qualified personnel, and credentialing of certified personnel. Feedback is sought on the draft guidelines over a 30-day period.
National Incident Management System - NQS Public FeedbackDavid Sweigert
The National Qualification System (NQS) provides a common language and approach to qualify emergency personnel in order to facilitate more effective mutual aid response. It establishes standardized job titles, minimum qualifications, and certification processes to help requesting agencies obtain resources with the needed skills and qualifications. The NQS supplements the National Incident Management System by providing guidance on personnel resource typing and supports the goal of a more secure and resilient nation through qualified emergency personnel who can respond across jurisdictions.
Nursing meets Hacking -- Medical Computer Emergency Response Teams -- MedCERTDavid Sweigert
The document discusses establishing Medical Computer Emergency Response Teams (MedCERT) to coordinate responses to cybersecurity incidents affecting medical devices and networks. It argues that healthcare cybersecurity is currently unprepared for emergencies and that response and recovery need to be emphasized in addition to prevention and protection. The document recommends that MedCERT teams receive training in the National Incident Management System and Incident Command System to effectively respond to incidents. It also calls for improved information sharing across the healthcare industry regarding cyber threats.
National Preparedness Goals 2015 2nd editionDavid Sweigert
The National Preparedness Goal outlines core capabilities across five mission areas - Prevention, Protection, Mitigation, Response, and Recovery - that are necessary to deal with risks facing the nation. The document describes each mission area and defines related core capabilities and preliminary targets. Prevention focuses on capabilities to avoid, prevent, or stop terrorist threats, while other mission areas take an all-hazards approach. Key capabilities include planning, public information and warning, operational coordination, intelligence and information sharing, and interdiction and disruption. The goal is for the whole community to achieve a secure and resilient nation through these interdependent capabilities.
The document provides an overview and update of the Healthcare and Public Health (HPH) Sector-Specific Plan (SSP). Key points include:
- The SSP establishes a vision, mission, goals, and activities to guide security and resilience efforts for HPH critical infrastructure.
- Goals focus on risk assessment, risk management, information sharing, partnership development, and response/recovery.
- Metrics will measure progress on priorities like risk analysis, information sharing, and partnership engagement.
- The update reflects maturation of sector partnerships and addresses evolving risks to critical infrastructure.
Cyber Risk Assessment for the Emergency Services Sector - DHSDavid Sweigert
The Emergency Services Sector Cyber Risk Assessment evaluates risks to six critical emergency services disciplines from potential cyber threats. Through a collaborative process, subject matter experts identified seven risk scenarios and assessed their potential consequences. High risks included natural disasters disrupting 9-1-1 systems, loss of critical databases hampering operations, and compromised systems spreading misinformation. The assessment aims to enhance cybersecurity and resilience across the emergency services sector through informed resource allocation and partnership.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
HIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NIST
1. 33 West Monroe St, Suite 1700
Chicago, IL 60603-5616
Tel 312 664 4467
Fax 312 664 6143
www.himss.org
1
October 10, 2014
Dr. Willie E. May
Acting Director
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Department of Commerce
100 Bureau Drive
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Dear Dr. May,
On behalf of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), we are pleased to provide written comments to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in response to the request for information (RFI), “Experience with the Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity,” published in the Federal Register on August 26, 2014.
HIMSS is a cause-based, global enterprise producing health IT thought leadership, education, events, market research and media services around the world. Founded in 1961, HIMSS encompasses more than 57,000 individuals, of which more than two-thirds work in healthcare provider, governmental and not-for-profit organizations, plus over 640 corporations and over 400 not-for-profit partner organizations that share this cause.
HIMSS welcomes the opportunity to contribute to this dialogue, and outlines our answers below to the questions posed in the RFI.
Current Awareness of the Cybersecurity Framework
What is the extent of awareness of the Framework among the Nation’s critical infrastructure organizations? Six months after the Framework was issued, has it gained the traction needed to be a factor in how organizations manage cyber risks in the Nation’s critical infrastructure?
In regards to the healthcare sector, HIMSS estimates that there is modest awareness about the Framework. There are a few organizations that have implemented the Framework; we note that our estimate is anecdotally based, and likely to be very small.
How have organizations learned about the Framework? Outreach from NIST or another government agency, an association, participation in a NIST workshop, news media? Other source?
HIMSS observes that the modest awareness among healthcare organizations appears to have been generated through communications at the workplace, HIMSS and other professional organizations, federal announcements and newsletters, but not necessarily from the media or other mainstream publications.
2. 2
Are critical infrastructure owners and operators working with sector-specific groups, non- profits, and other organizations that support critical infrastructure to receive information and share lessons learned about the Framework?
HIMSS has monitored development of the Framework; we’ve shared its progress with our stakeholders. In addition, we’ve submitted comments on the discussion draft with expert input from our HIMSS Privacy and Security Committee, including the following observations:
1) To strengthen cybersecurity and support business objectives of healthcare organizations, we recommend that privacy and security be integrated into the organization’s business objectives;
2) To strengthen cybersecurity, we suggest that organizations increase their resilience to cyber incidents by utilizing lessons learned as part of their short-term and long-term recovery efforts.
3) To better handle incidents, we suggest that healthcare organizations have an incident response plan in place which focuses on handling cyber incidents in terms of the roles and actions of people, processes, and technology within the healthcare organization.[1]
We acknowledge and appreciate that NIST has incorporated HIMSS’s comments into Version 1.0 of the Framework.
Is there general awareness that the Framework: a. Is intended for voluntary use? b. Is intended as a cyber risk management tool for all levels of an organization in assessing risk and how cybersecurity factors into risk assessments?
a. Yes. For those organizations aware of the Framework, they understand the Framework is intended for voluntary use. However, further education and information-sharing is necessary to alleviate concerns that the Framework is being mandated by regulation or law.
b. Yes, we believe it is generally understood that the Framework is intended as a cyber risk management tool for all levels of an organization in assessing risk. We also note that the Framework makes clear how cybersecurity factors into risk assessments. However, we suggest that NIST consider publishing guidance on adoption and use of the Framework, tailored to the type and size of the organization, as we believe such guidance may be helpful.
What are the greatest challenges and opportunities—for NIST, the Federal government more broadly, and the private sector—to improve awareness of the Framework?
NIST could improve the field’s awareness of the Framework by providing a means for healthcare organizations – those that have adopted and implemented the Framework – to discuss use of the Framework to their advantage to manage risk. Input could be sought from small, medium, and large healthcare organizations in both urban and rural settings.
[1] HIMSS’ Response to NIST Preliminary version of the Cybersecurity Framework; December 2013. http://csrc.nist.gov/cyberframework/framework_comments/20131213_thomas_leary_himss_part2.pdf
3. 3
Is your organization doing any form of outreach or education on cybersecurity risk management (including the Framework)? If so, what kind of outreach and how many entities are you reaching? If not, does your organization plan to do any form of outreach or awareness on the Framework?
HIMSS utilizes a variety of outreach and educational initiatives to inform and educate our stakeholders. We also participate with other non-profit organizations representing critical infrastructure sectors, in an information sharing initiative to discuss the Framework. We work with our stakeholders through HIMSS’s volunteer-led Privacy and Security Committee, and associated Task Forces and Work Groups to build educational deliverables relating to risk management, through blog posts and privacy and security toolkits, which are all available on our website. HIMSS also has year-round educational initiatives and deliverables relating to risk management, including the biannual Privacy and Security Forum, and the mHealth Summit Mobile Privacy and Security Symposium. Finally, as appropriate, HIMSS connects with government agencies to provide education and information relating to risk management.
What more can and should be done to raise awareness?
We suggest that NIST widely present the Framework at health sector-oriented conferences. Another suggestion is NIST create a repository of information in which organizations across the various critical infrastructure sectors can contribute information, comments, and feedback relevant to experiences, lessons learned, and best practices with respect to adoption and use of the Framework.
Experiences with the Cybersecurity Framework
Do organizations in some sectors require some type of sector specific guidance prior to use?
Yes, we have observed that the health sector has become acutely aware of cyber attacks, insider threats, and other malicious activity. However, traditionally, healthcare’s focus has been on HIPAA compliance. Compliance, though, does not necessarily mean that information will be kept safe and secure. Accordingly, healthcare providers, other covered entities, and the business associates that do work on behalf of these covered entities, all need practical and detailed guidance on making the transition from “compliance only” to being secure (in the same sense that other critical infrastructure sectors, such as the chemical, electrical, and financial sectors have adopted and embraced security). The healthcare industry also could benefit from specific guidance from NIST (with input from healthcare stakeholders) on what an ideal “target state” would be for a healthcare organization. Stakeholders would also benefit from a common, industry-wide understanding and agreement of what the target state should be as well as standard metrics/tools to measure current state and progress made by a healthcare organization towards that target state. Both privacy risk management and information security risk management should be addressed (as well as the points of intersection and other points of connection between these two spheres). The target state and standard metrics/tools are not provided by HIPAA, the HITECH Act, or other associated or related guidance.
4. 4
Which activities by NIST, the Department of Commerce overall (including the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO); National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA); and the Internet Policy Taskforce (IPTF)) or other departments and agencies could be expanded or initiated to promote implementation of the Framework?
The National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) could be used to promote better awareness and more specific guidance with regard to the Framework. For example, the PTO could assist with the Framework by ensuring that the quality of patent review and patent application review remains high with respect to patents and patent applications relating to risk management and cybersecurity, in addition to other related arts.
Roadmap for the Future of the Cybersecurity Framework
Are key cybersecurity issues and opportunities missing that should be considered as priorities, and if so, what are they and why do they merit special attention?
The Framework could explain in detail what constitutes an accurate, thorough, and holistic risk assessment. As we are in an age where much information is electronic and, if information is not secure, it very well may not be private. The Framework could explain in detail how privacy and cybersecurity interrelate. Consideration should also be given to our global economy and global interdependencies and the need to manage risk on a global scale, with the understanding that entities can and do interact across critical infrastructure sectors. The interdependence among the critical infrastructure sectors can result in shared threats and vulnerabilities. This approach would truly be managing risk in the real world, as opposed to managing risk in a vacuum. We suggest that NIST (with input from healthcare stakeholders) bring together government, academia, and industry to develop a Framework which is fluid and flexible enough to be a living document which can be improved and revamped to ensure that the Framework content reflects real world risks and risk management, including in view of interdependencies among the critical infrastructure sectors.
According to the 6th Annual HIMSS Security Survey1, released February 19, 2014, more than half of the survey’s respondents (51%) have increased their security budgets in the past year. However, 49% of these organizations are still spending 3% or less of their overall IT budget on security initiatives that will secure patient data— the industry average is cited as 5% of the total IT budget on security. Information security in the health sector is generally underfunded. In spite of this, more healthcare stakeholders are strengthening their information security programs (or are interested in do so, but need additional guidance), in light of recent breaches and cyber attacks. To the extent that other critical infrastructure sectors have applied the Framework to address breaches and cyber attacks, these lessons learned may be of interest to HIMSS and its healthcare stakeholders.
1 HIMSS Security Survey; February 2014: http://www.himss.org/files/2013_HIMSS_Security_Survey.pdf
5. 5
HIMSS appreciates the opportunity to submit comments on this RFI—this framework presents an opportunity for HIMSS to work with NIST to further educate health stakeholders on appropriate information security practices. We look forward to continued dialogue with NIST and the Department of Commerce, and welcome any questions you may have. For more information, please contact Jeff Coughlin, Senior Director of Federal & State Affairs, at 703.562.8824, or Stephanie Jamison, Director of Federal Affairs, at 703.562.8844.
Sincerely,
Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS H. Stephen Lieber, CAE Chair, HIMSS Board of Directors President & CEO Chief Medical Informatics Officer HIMSS Stratis Health