This document summarizes a seminar on the management of hepatitis C. It discusses the virology of hepatitis C virus and outlines guidelines for patient evaluation, counseling, and antiviral therapy. The summary focuses on the evolution of hepatitis C treatment from interferon-based regimens to highly effective all-oral direct-acting antiviral combination therapies that achieve over 95% cure rates.
Hepatitis: inflammation of the liver.
Causes of viral hepatitis:
Common:
Hepatitis A virus (HAV)
Hepatitis B virus (HBV)
hepatitis C virus (HCV)
Hepatitis D virus (HDV)
Hepatitis E virus (HEV)
HBV-associated delta agent
Outline:
Introduction
Epidemiologic Determinants
Mode of transmission
Burden of Hepatitis-B
Prevention and treatment
Challenges
Recent Advances in Hepatitis B research
Strategies
References
In this presentation, we will provide General Information on Treatment of Hepatitis C which are available.
Hepatitis means inflammation of the liver. Hepatitis C is a liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus. The virus can cause both acute and chronic hepatitis infection, ranging in severity from a mild illness lasting a few weeks to a serious, lifelong illness.
Hepatitis: inflammation of the liver.
Causes of viral hepatitis:
Common:
Hepatitis A virus (HAV)
Hepatitis B virus (HBV)
hepatitis C virus (HCV)
Hepatitis D virus (HDV)
Hepatitis E virus (HEV)
HBV-associated delta agent
Outline:
Introduction
Epidemiologic Determinants
Mode of transmission
Burden of Hepatitis-B
Prevention and treatment
Challenges
Recent Advances in Hepatitis B research
Strategies
References
In this presentation, we will provide General Information on Treatment of Hepatitis C which are available.
Hepatitis means inflammation of the liver. Hepatitis C is a liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus. The virus can cause both acute and chronic hepatitis infection, ranging in severity from a mild illness lasting a few weeks to a serious, lifelong illness.
Jill Blumenthal, M.D., of UC San Diego AntiViral Research Center, presents "International AIDS Conference 2014: A Moderately Rapid Review" at AIDS Clinical Rounds
A power point presentation on Hepatitis C virus on epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis and current treatment strategies we are practicing in BSMMU at a international standerd.
Patients with acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection appear to have an excellent chance of responding to 6 months of standard therapy with interferon (IFN). Because spontaneous resolution is common, no definitive timing of therapy initiation can be recommended; however, waiting 2-4 months after the onset of illness seems reasonable.
Treatment for chronic HCV is based on guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Associations for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), in collaboration with the International Antiviral Society-USA (IAS-USA). These guidelines are constantly being updated. For more information, see HCV Guidance: Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C.
The guidelines propose that because all patients cannot receive treatment immediately upon the approval of new agents, priority should be given to those with the most urgent need.
The recommendations include the following :
Patients with advanced fibrosis, those with compensated cirrhosis, liver transplant recipients, and those with severe extraheptic hepatitis are to be given the highest priority for treatment
Based on available resources, patients at high risk for liver-related complications and severe extrahepatic hepatitis C complications should be given high priority for treatment
Treatment decisions should balance the anticipated reduction in transmission versus the likelihood of reinfection in patients whose risk of HCV transmission is high and in whom HCV treatment may result in a reduction in transmission (eg, men who have high-risk sex with men, active injection drug users, incarcerated persons, and those on hemodialysis)
Work-up and management of chronic hepatitis B in non-pregnant adults, especially in a setting with limited resources such as Pakistan's healthcare system.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Introduction:
RNA interference (RNAi) or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) is an important biological process for modulating eukaryotic gene expression.
It is highly conserved process of posttranscriptional gene silencing by which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) causes sequence-specific degradation of mRNA sequences.
dsRNA-induced gene silencing (RNAi) is reported in a wide range of eukaryotes ranging from worms, insects, mammals and plants.
This process mediates resistance to both endogenous parasitic and exogenous pathogenic nucleic acids, and regulates the expression of protein-coding genes.
What are small ncRNAs?
micro RNA (miRNA)
short interfering RNA (siRNA)
Properties of small non-coding RNA:
Involved in silencing mRNA transcripts.
Called “small” because they are usually only about 21-24 nucleotides long.
Synthesized by first cutting up longer precursor sequences (like the 61nt one that Lee discovered).
Silence an mRNA by base pairing with some sequence on the mRNA.
Discovery of siRNA?
The first small RNA:
In 1993 Rosalind Lee (Victor Ambros lab) was studying a non- coding gene in C. elegans, lin-4, that was involved in silencing of another gene, lin-14, at the appropriate time in the
development of the worm C. elegans.
Two small transcripts of lin-4 (22nt and 61nt) were found to be complementary to a sequence in the 3' UTR of lin-14.
Because lin-4 encoded no protein, she deduced that it must be these transcripts that are causing the silencing by RNA-RNA interactions.
Types of RNAi ( non coding RNA)
MiRNA
Length (23-25 nt)
Trans acting
Binds with target MRNA in mismatch
Translation inhibition
Si RNA
Length 21 nt.
Cis acting
Bind with target Mrna in perfect complementary sequence
Piwi-RNA
Length ; 25 to 36 nt.
Expressed in Germ Cells
Regulates trnasposomes activity
MECHANISM OF RNAI:
First the double-stranded RNA teams up with a protein complex named Dicer, which cuts the long RNA into short pieces.
Then another protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) discards one of the two RNA strands.
The RISC-docked, single-stranded RNA then pairs with the homologous mRNA and destroys it.
THE RISC COMPLEX:
RISC is large(>500kD) RNA multi- protein Binding complex which triggers MRNA degradation in response to MRNA
Unwinding of double stranded Si RNA by ATP independent Helicase
Active component of RISC is Ago proteins( ENDONUCLEASE) which cleave target MRNA.
DICER: endonuclease (RNase Family III)
Argonaute: Central Component of the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC)
One strand of the dsRNA produced by Dicer is retained in the RISC complex in association with Argonaute
ARGONAUTE PROTEIN :
1.PAZ(PIWI/Argonaute/ Zwille)- Recognition of target MRNA
2.PIWI (p-element induced wimpy Testis)- breaks Phosphodiester bond of mRNA.)RNAse H activity.
MiRNA:
The Double-stranded RNAs are naturally produced in eukaryotic cells during development, and they have a key role in regulating gene expression .
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
2. MANAGEMENT OF HEPATITIS C
Speaker- Dr. Reshmi Harikumar Pillai
Guide - Dr. Neera Samar
RNT MEDICAL COLLEGE AND MB GOVT HOSPITAL
DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE
SEMINAR
4. INTRODUCTION
oWHO- 71 million –global disease burden
o4,00,000 die each year
oIndia : 12-13 million anti-HCV positive patients
oAll ages ; highest between 20-39 years ; male predominance
oIncubation period : 15-160 days(mean 50)
5. VIROLOGY
o Linear single strand , positive sense , 9600 nucleotide RNA virus
o Previously labelled ‘non-A, non-B hepatitis’
o Genus Hepacivirus, Family Flaviviridae
o50-80nm size ; T1/2- 2.7 hours
oCirculates in low titre-103-107 virions/ml
oHigh replication rate – 1012virions/day
6. o 6 distinct major genotypes(and a minor genotype 7); >50 subtypes
within genotypes .
oGenotypes differ in responsiveness to antiviral therapy; but not in
pathogenicity/clinical progression .
oMost sensitive indicator of infection :HCV RNA (PCR/TMA)-in IU/ml;
detected within a few days of exposure and persist for the duration of
HCV infection
7. WORLDWIDEDISTRIBUTIONOFHCVGENOTYPE
o Globally, HCV genotype 1 is the most prevalent worldwide (49.1%), followed by
genotype 3 (17.9%), 4 (16.8%) and 2 (11.0%), while genotypes 5 and 6 are responsible
for the remaining < 5% . 1>3>4>2>5,6
o Most prevalent in India – Genotype 3
8. oTransmission : Percutaneous (transfusion/HD/occupational exposure)/
perinatal & sexual(5%)
oBreastfeeding –no increased risk
oRisk of Transfusion associated HCV : 1 in 2.3 million transfusion
oHCV infection by accidental needle puncture ~3%
12. LABORATORY PARAMETERS
oEpisodic aminotransferase elevation
oSerology : Anti-HCV(Non specificity can confound immunoassays for anti-HCV)
oAssays for HCV RNA(amplification techniques)---most sensitive ---GOLD STANDARD
oHCV RNA level is NOT a marker of disease severity; may predict relative
responsiveness to antiviral therapy
oDetermination of genotype
oOccasional finding : Autoantibody(anti LKM1)
13.
14. GUIDELINES
o Released jointly by the AASLD(American association for the study of liver disease)
and the Infectious Disease Society of America(IDSA)-2014 guidelines
o European Association for the Study of Liver Disease(EASL)
o WHO – Guidelines regarding Screening and Treatment of HCV
15. PATIENT EVALUATION
o Assessment of the extent of liver Disease
o Assessment of viral and host factors –antiviral selection
-Viral genotype
-Stage of liver fibrosis
-History of antiviral treatment
-Renal function
-Concurrent medication
o Identification of comorbidities associated with HCV infection
o Test for HIV and HBV – common modes of transmission
16. COUNSELING
o Psychosocial issues:
-Counseling and screening for depression
-Substance use treatment/Psychiatric services
o Transmission risk
o Diet and behaviours
Avoid modifiable factors associated with accelerated liver disease: Alcohol use,
obesity, Insulin resistance and marijuana use.
17. GENERAL MANAGEMENT
o ANTIVIRAL TREATMENT = CORNERSTONE
o Symptom Management:
o Dose adjustments of medications
o Vaccination: Pneumococcal vaccination , Hepatitis A/B
o Advanced liver fibrosis / cirrhosis: Signs of liver failure/ esophageal varices/HCC
19. Goals of Therapy
oEradicate HCV RNA :Predicted by attainment of a sustained virological response(SVR):
oUndetectable RNA level 12 weeks following the completion of Therapy
oSVR- 97-100% chance of being HCV RNA negative during long term follow up
oAntiviral Therapy:
Improves survival/ Complication free survival / Slows Progression / Reversal of fibrosis
20.
21.
22.
23. INDICATIONS
oAll patients with chronic HCV infection (detectable HCV RNA over a 6 month period,
with or without elevated ALT)
oException : Those with short life expectancies
oAny stage of fibrosis; highest priority for advanced fibrosis [METAVIR stage 3]/
cirrhosis [METAVIR stage 4]
24. oRETREATMENT RECOMMENDED
Relapsers, partial responders, or nonresponders after a previous course of
interferon-based therapy or prior direct-acting antiviral therapy
oSCREENING FOR HBV -MANDATORY
HBV reactivation occurs in those receiving DAA in patients with HBV/HCV
coinfection
25. REGIMEN SELECTION
o INDIVIDUALISED : Varies by Genotype/ Patient factors- cirrhosis , treatment history
oMonitor serum HCV RNA levels- Pretreatment / During treatment / after treatment
26. ACUTE HEPATITIS C
Same directly acting agents as that used in chronic infection
Choice: Delay 12-16weeks spontaneous recovery
Acute Hepatitis C is not rapidly progressive
EASL Guidelines : Genotype appropriate DAA Regimen
Sofosbuvir + one of the approved without Ribavirin x 8weeks
NS5A Inhibitors
Extend to 12 weeks 1)HIV Coinfection
2)HCV RNA level > 1 million IU/ml
27.
28. CHRONIC HEPATITIS C
oThe Interferon Era(1991-2011)
oFirst Generation Protease Inhibitors(2011-2013)
oContemporary Direct acting Antiviral combination Therapy (2013-)
oFuture Direct acting antiviral combination therapy(2017-)
o6 ALL ORAL , HIGHLY EFFECTIVE,LOW RESISTANCE,WELL TOLERATED SHORT
DURATION(12 WEEKS) COMBINATION REGIMENS
29. The Interferon Era(1991-2011)
IFN alpha – first given as s/c injection thrice weekly x 6 months SVR <10%
X 12 MONTHS~SVR 20%
+ RIBAVIRIN SVR-55% (IFN + RIBAVIRIN = SYNERGISTIC)
40% SVR in genotypes 1 ,4 ; 80% in genotypes 3,4
30. MECHANISM OF ACTION OF INTERFERON:
-Activation of JAKSTAT signal transduction pathwayelaboration of genes / protein
products that have antiviral properties
-90% virological response is achieved within 12 weeks of therapy
-SVR12(Current standard)=24 week SVR(previous standard)=CURE
Genetic changes in the virus explains differences in treatment responsiveness
GENOTYPE DURATION SVR
1 48 WEEKS 40-45%
2,3 24 WEEKS 80%
32. MECHANISM OF ACTION OF RIBAVIRIN
-Reduction of HCV replication
-Inhibits host IMP dehydrogenase activity
-Induction of virological mutational catastrophe
-Enhancement of IFN medicated gene expression
-Immunomodulation
33. ADVERSE EFFECTS OF INTERFERON:
o Dose dependent side effects
o Flu like symptoms, hematological toxicity, elevated transaminases, nausea, fatigue,
psychiatric sequelae
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF RIBAVIRIN:
o Hemolysis – Reduction in hemoglobin by 2-3g/Hct by5-10%
o Nasal and chest congestion/pruritis/gout
o Contraindications: Anaemia/Hemoglobinopathy/CAD/CVA/CKD/pregnancy
34.
35. First Generation Protease Inhibitors(2011-
2013)
oHCV RNA Genome Single polyprotein
oProtease – NS3/4A –serine protease activity
oTelaprevir/ Boceprevir + PEG IFN + Ribavirin = for Genotype 1
oResistance with monotherapy
38. DISADVANTAGE:
-High pill burden
-q8H dosing with food
-Metabolised by CYP3A4-multiple interactions
-Triple drug protease inhibitor therapy – amplified intolerability
-RAS(resistance associated substitution)/RAV(resistance associated
variation)responsible for protease inhibitor nonresponders
39. Contemporary Direct acting Antiviral
combination Therapy (2013-)
6 therapeutic regimens--all oral-- IFN –free -- >95% SVR -- simple dosing--low pill
burden--resistance—8-12 weeks—pangenotypic efficacy
3 classes:
-NS3/4 protease inhibitors(cleave HCV polyprotein into structural and nonstructural
proteins)-Grazoprevir,Paritaprevir
-NS5B nucleoside and nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitors(interfere with RNA
dependent RNAP- a Replicase)-Sofosbuvir,Dasabuvir
- NS5A inhibitors(interfere with a membrane associated phosphoprotein essential to
the HCV RNA replication complex)-Daclatasvir,Elbasvir,Velpatasvir,Ombitasvir
40.
41.
42. SIMEPREVIR:
Second generation protease inhibitor for genotype 1
Once daily dosing, not response guided therapy
Numerous drug-drug interactions
ADR: photosensitivity, rash, mild hyperbilirubinemia
Reduced efficacy= HCV NS3 polymorphism Q80K –necessitates genetic testing and
disqualificationof 30%
Simeprevir 150mg + Sofosbuvir 200mg x 12weeks 97% SVR12 -treatment
naiive/experienced w/o cirrhosis
88% SVR12 t/t naiive / 79% SVR12
t/t refractory with cirrhosis
43. SOFOSBUVIR
1ST non protease inhibitor DAA
High potency/pangenotypic activity/barrier to resistance/min. interactions
Used in combination with protease inhibitor / NS5A inhibitor x 8 weeks upto 24 weeks
ADR: Fatigue , insomnia, headache, nausea
44. SOFOSBUVIR / LEPIDASVIR:
SOF 400mg + NS5A inhibitor Lepidasvir 90mg
Once daily, single pill (FDC)
Effective for genotypes 1,4,5,6
Treatment naiive non cirrhotics/cirrhotics 97% SVR12
Cirrhotic non responders to IFN based therapy 86% SVR12 (12 weeks) v/s 100%
SVR12 (24 weeks)
Renal safety-not known
Extremely effective against post transplant HCV
C/I Amiodarone/beta blocker(Bradyacardia) ; P gp inducers(reduced activity)
45. SOFOSBUVIR AND DACLATASVIR
SOF 400mg + DACLA 60mg once daily x 12-24 weeks
Genotypes 12,3,4 + 5,6(EASL)
SVR12 rates for 12 weeks :-98% -genotype 1 ,92%-genotype 2, 89% genotype 3
Addition of Ribavirin in noncirrhotics- no benefit
Cirrhotics: Child A , B – 93% SVR12; Child C-56% SVR12
Well tolerated(fatigue, headache, nausea)
C/I Amiodarone/beta blocker(Bradycardia)
Interactions with CYP3A, OATP1B1 and 1B3 , BCP, P-gp
46. SOFOSBUVIR AND VELPATASVIR.
Velpatasvir 100mg(pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor) + Sofosbuvir 400mg single pill
Addition of Ribavirin –decompensated cases
Genotypes 1,2,4,5 -99% SVR12
Genotypes 3 -95% SVR12
Baseline NS5A RASs – no impact on responsiveness
ADR: mild headache, nausea, fatigue
C/I Amiodarone/beta blocker(Bradycardia)
CYP3A inducers, P-gp inducers(reduces plasma drug levels)
51. SPECIAL SITUATION
o HCV + CRF : 7.5% HCV prevalence in CKD
o HCV +HBV : Similar SVR rates. Screening for HBV is a must disease flare
o HCV +HIV : SVR similar to monoinfection. Drug interaction between DAAs and ARV
medication
o TB + HCV : Screen for active TB and treat before commencing therapy for HCV.
Monitor LFT --- higher incidence of antimicrobial induced hepatotoxicity
52. AVAILABLE TREATMENT OPTIONS
o FIXED DOSE : SOFOSBUVIR + LEDIPASVIR X 8 WEEKS
o Effective for all genotypes except 2,3/NO baseline RAS testing
o Genotype 2,3: Single Pill SOFOSBUVIR + VELPATASVIR X 12 WEEKS
53. LET’S SUMMARISE…….
REGIMEN
TYPE
CATEGORY OF PATIENTS REGIMEN RECOMMENDED DURATION
I WITHOUT CIRRHOSIS SOFOSBUVIR 400mg + DACLATASVIR 60mg 12 WEEKS
II COMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS(CHILD-PUGH A) SOFOSBUVIR 400mg + VELPATASVIR 100mg 12 WEEKS
III DECOMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS(CHILD-PUGH
B AND C)
(FDC)SOFOSBUVIR 400
mg+VELPATASVIR100mg+ RIBAVIRIN
RIBAVIRN INTOLERANT :
SOFOSBUVIR400mg+VELPATASVIR100mg
12 WEEKS
24 WEEKS
MANAGEMENT OF TREATMENT NAÏVE PATIENTS
54. DRUG DOSAGE RECOMMENDATION
NAME OF DRUG DOSAGE
SOFOSBUVIR 400mg ONCE DAILY
DACLATASVIR 60mg ONCE DAILY
SOFOSBUVIR+VELPATASVIR SOF 400mg + VEL 100mg ONCE DAILY
RIBAVIRIN 800-1200mg
55. PROPHYLAXIS
oHep C vaccination not feasible: Genotype and quasispecies heterogeneity , rapid
evasion of neutralizing antibodies by rapidly mutating virus
oBehaviour changes and precautions to limit exposure
56. National Viral Hepatitis Control
Programme
oEarly diagnosis and treatment
o Provision of free qualitative and quantitative testing
o Main Objective : Provision of free DAA
o Screening of high risk patients
o Aim: - Reduce deaths due to HCV by 2/3 in the next decade and eliminate HCV by
2030