How do indicators of Health and Wellness and Ecosystem Sustainability relate? Can we predict how healthy a population is by looking at what their environmental impact is?
True Growth - Driving Economic and Social Progresssocprog
To effectively tackle the economic and social problems that challenge national stability and growth, both must be measured. The Social Progress Index 2014 focuses on a country’s social and environmental strengths and weaknesses, independent of their economic performance. Covering critical issues such as healthcare, infrastructure and civil liberties, the Index benchmarks country performance to drive forward national debate and help prioritize investment decisions.
Professor Michael E Porter of Harvard Business School delivered this presentation at Deloitte's London headquarters to a packed room of business and civil society leaders, and to a global audience via webcast.
Joined by Bea Perez of Coca-Cola, Sally Osberg of the Skoll Foundation, Steve Almond of Deloitte, David Sproul of Deloitte, and Michael Green of the Social Progress Imperative, Professor Porter delivered the case for measuring social progress, and how the 2014 Index and findings can be used to hone in on the true weaknesses of a nation.
Professor Michael E Porter at #WhatWorks2016socprog
On April 28, 2016, social innovators from 6 continents gathered in Reykjavik to join Harvard Business School Professor Michael E. Porter to identify solutions to some of the world’s biggest problems.
The conference was a watershed discussion of how countries including Brazil, Costa Rica, Iceland, Nepal, New Zealand and Rwanda and cities and regions such as Medellin, Colombia and the Basque Region of Spain have achieved standout social progress results.
Insight from the Social Progress Index, a powerful new benchmarking tool to connect decision-makers with fresh perspectives on social performance, anchored these conversations.
Launch of the Social Progress Index for Bogotásocprog
This is the deck used by Matthew Bishop of The Economist at the launch of the world's first intra-city Social Progress Index in Bogotá Colombia on November 23, 2015.
Michael Green's Presentation at Ireland's National Economic Dialogue on June ...socprog
Social Progress Imperative CEO Michael Green contributed to the opening plenary at 10:05 a.m. to support the meeting's theme of "Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in the Context of National and
Global Challenges" at the Printworks Conference Center in the Dublin Castle on June 28, 2017. Green compared Ireland's results on the recently launched 2017 Social Progress Index to countries with similar GDP per capita and highlighted where more progress can be achieved in the next budget cycle. Surrounding the event, Social Progress Imperative and its partners Deloitte and ChangeX also invite media to learn more about how the Irish government can use both social progress and economic data to develop fiscal policy.
Michael Green at the Equitable Access Initiative Feb 22 2016socprog
The Equitable Access Initiative is an initiative to look at the problem of using GDP per capita as the basis for decisions on which countries should receive aid and how much they should receive.
Social Progress Index data shows that the problem of using GDP per capita data to make aid decisions applies to many sectors.
2013 Skoll World Forum Panel Presentation of the Social Progress Index Designsocprog
2013 Skoll World Forum panel session presentation on the Social Progress Index design, delivered by Professor Michael E. Porter, Bishop William Lawrence University Professor, Harvard Business School.
Michael E Porter: "Social Progress: The Next Development Agenda"socprog
Date: Thursday, October 29, 2015
Time: 12:30 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. (ET)
Location: Preston Auditorium, World Bank Group HQ & Online
How do we measure development? The Social Progress Index (SPI) was launched in 2013 as a holistic approach to benchmarking countries’ social performance, independent of economic measures. The SPI has been widely taken up on a global basis in evaluating national performance, and sub-national indices are proliferating at the regional and city level. In this lecture, Professor Porter will describe the insights that the SPI provides about the relationship between economic development and social progress, along with exploring the implications for development thinking and how the World Bank can best deliver on its “shared prosperity” goal.
True Growth - Driving Economic and Social Progresssocprog
To effectively tackle the economic and social problems that challenge national stability and growth, both must be measured. The Social Progress Index 2014 focuses on a country’s social and environmental strengths and weaknesses, independent of their economic performance. Covering critical issues such as healthcare, infrastructure and civil liberties, the Index benchmarks country performance to drive forward national debate and help prioritize investment decisions.
Professor Michael E Porter of Harvard Business School delivered this presentation at Deloitte's London headquarters to a packed room of business and civil society leaders, and to a global audience via webcast.
Joined by Bea Perez of Coca-Cola, Sally Osberg of the Skoll Foundation, Steve Almond of Deloitte, David Sproul of Deloitte, and Michael Green of the Social Progress Imperative, Professor Porter delivered the case for measuring social progress, and how the 2014 Index and findings can be used to hone in on the true weaknesses of a nation.
Professor Michael E Porter at #WhatWorks2016socprog
On April 28, 2016, social innovators from 6 continents gathered in Reykjavik to join Harvard Business School Professor Michael E. Porter to identify solutions to some of the world’s biggest problems.
The conference was a watershed discussion of how countries including Brazil, Costa Rica, Iceland, Nepal, New Zealand and Rwanda and cities and regions such as Medellin, Colombia and the Basque Region of Spain have achieved standout social progress results.
Insight from the Social Progress Index, a powerful new benchmarking tool to connect decision-makers with fresh perspectives on social performance, anchored these conversations.
Launch of the Social Progress Index for Bogotásocprog
This is the deck used by Matthew Bishop of The Economist at the launch of the world's first intra-city Social Progress Index in Bogotá Colombia on November 23, 2015.
Michael Green's Presentation at Ireland's National Economic Dialogue on June ...socprog
Social Progress Imperative CEO Michael Green contributed to the opening plenary at 10:05 a.m. to support the meeting's theme of "Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in the Context of National and
Global Challenges" at the Printworks Conference Center in the Dublin Castle on June 28, 2017. Green compared Ireland's results on the recently launched 2017 Social Progress Index to countries with similar GDP per capita and highlighted where more progress can be achieved in the next budget cycle. Surrounding the event, Social Progress Imperative and its partners Deloitte and ChangeX also invite media to learn more about how the Irish government can use both social progress and economic data to develop fiscal policy.
Michael Green at the Equitable Access Initiative Feb 22 2016socprog
The Equitable Access Initiative is an initiative to look at the problem of using GDP per capita as the basis for decisions on which countries should receive aid and how much they should receive.
Social Progress Index data shows that the problem of using GDP per capita data to make aid decisions applies to many sectors.
2013 Skoll World Forum Panel Presentation of the Social Progress Index Designsocprog
2013 Skoll World Forum panel session presentation on the Social Progress Index design, delivered by Professor Michael E. Porter, Bishop William Lawrence University Professor, Harvard Business School.
Michael E Porter: "Social Progress: The Next Development Agenda"socprog
Date: Thursday, October 29, 2015
Time: 12:30 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. (ET)
Location: Preston Auditorium, World Bank Group HQ & Online
How do we measure development? The Social Progress Index (SPI) was launched in 2013 as a holistic approach to benchmarking countries’ social performance, independent of economic measures. The SPI has been widely taken up on a global basis in evaluating national performance, and sub-national indices are proliferating at the regional and city level. In this lecture, Professor Porter will describe the insights that the SPI provides about the relationship between economic development and social progress, along with exploring the implications for development thinking and how the World Bank can best deliver on its “shared prosperity” goal.
A summary of the presentations made during our SMART-Drop door drop seminar in which better targeting of leaflet distributions was demonstrated. This also reduces wastage and provides an improved ROI.
Bones are living tissues which undergo remodeling, a process which is important to maintain balance to ensure healthy bone mass density and avoid fractures throughout our lives. Collagen provides the organic framework in bones on which minerals are deposited and also contribute to bone flexibility and strength.
Calcium, vitamin D and protein are the key bone health nutrients. Collagen is essential for improving bone flexibility, which helps bones absorb impact. As a pure protein, Peptan collagen peptides work together with calcium and vitamin to support bone health.
Supplements with collagen peptides can strengthen bones as documented in multiple in vitro, in vivo and clinical trials. Peptan Research has shown that collagen peptides can stimulate the endogenous production of collagen in bone tissue, triggering osteoblasts (bone formation cells) and increasing bone size and firmness.
Download this leaflet to find out more about Peptan's efficacy in supporting bone health.
Leaflet Distribution Team is the UK's premier leaflet delivery and flyer printing company covering the South East and the local counties. Leaflet Distribution Team offers a reliable and trusted flyer distribution service that has zero tolerance on bad leaflet delivery tactics.
Education at a Glance 2015 - Global LaunchEduSkills OECD
Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators is the authoritative source for information on the state of education around the world. It provides data on the structure, finances and performance of education systems in the 34 OECD countries and a number of partner countries.
With more than 100 charts, 150 tables and links to another 150 tables on line, Education at a Glance 2015 provides key information on the output of educational institutions; the impact of learning across countries; the financial and human resources invested in education; access, participation and progression in education;and the learning environment and organisation of schools.
Matthew Bishop: Rethinking What We Measure at Closing the Gap December 8 2015 socprog
Presentation by Matthew Bishop of The Economist, and member of the Board of Directors of the Social Progress Imperative, on the Social Progress Index at Closing the Gap in Palm Beach, Florida on December 8, 2015. The event brought together leaders from business, education, policy, foundations, and communities to explore solutions for a more inclusive economy.
Youth Progress Index Presentation to the European Parliamentsocprog
The Youth Progress Index is one of the most innovative tools for measuring the quality of life of young people because it reflects the things most important to their safety, health and freedom, and like all our indexes, it remains independent of economic indicators. This social progress index offers distinct and equally important insight that will be critically helpful in empowering the largest generation ever in their transition from childhood to adulthood. To learn more, visit https://www.youthforum.org/youth-progress-index/.
European Union Regional Social Progress Index Scorecardssocprog
This deck contains the scorecards for each of 272 regions of the 28 member states of the European Union showing performance on each of 50 indicators. Launched October 11, 2016, the EU Index is a three-year collaborative project carried out by the Social Progress Imperative, Orkestra (a research institute on competitiveness in the Basque region) and the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy of the European Commission. The Index aims at providing consistent, comparable and actionable measures of social and environmental issues. Please note that this Index is not created for the purpose of funding allocation and does not bind the European Commission. Explore all the data: http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/custom-indexes/european-union/
A summary of the presentations made during our SMART-Drop door drop seminar in which better targeting of leaflet distributions was demonstrated. This also reduces wastage and provides an improved ROI.
Bones are living tissues which undergo remodeling, a process which is important to maintain balance to ensure healthy bone mass density and avoid fractures throughout our lives. Collagen provides the organic framework in bones on which minerals are deposited and also contribute to bone flexibility and strength.
Calcium, vitamin D and protein are the key bone health nutrients. Collagen is essential for improving bone flexibility, which helps bones absorb impact. As a pure protein, Peptan collagen peptides work together with calcium and vitamin to support bone health.
Supplements with collagen peptides can strengthen bones as documented in multiple in vitro, in vivo and clinical trials. Peptan Research has shown that collagen peptides can stimulate the endogenous production of collagen in bone tissue, triggering osteoblasts (bone formation cells) and increasing bone size and firmness.
Download this leaflet to find out more about Peptan's efficacy in supporting bone health.
Leaflet Distribution Team is the UK's premier leaflet delivery and flyer printing company covering the South East and the local counties. Leaflet Distribution Team offers a reliable and trusted flyer distribution service that has zero tolerance on bad leaflet delivery tactics.
Education at a Glance 2015 - Global LaunchEduSkills OECD
Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators is the authoritative source for information on the state of education around the world. It provides data on the structure, finances and performance of education systems in the 34 OECD countries and a number of partner countries.
With more than 100 charts, 150 tables and links to another 150 tables on line, Education at a Glance 2015 provides key information on the output of educational institutions; the impact of learning across countries; the financial and human resources invested in education; access, participation and progression in education;and the learning environment and organisation of schools.
Matthew Bishop: Rethinking What We Measure at Closing the Gap December 8 2015 socprog
Presentation by Matthew Bishop of The Economist, and member of the Board of Directors of the Social Progress Imperative, on the Social Progress Index at Closing the Gap in Palm Beach, Florida on December 8, 2015. The event brought together leaders from business, education, policy, foundations, and communities to explore solutions for a more inclusive economy.
Youth Progress Index Presentation to the European Parliamentsocprog
The Youth Progress Index is one of the most innovative tools for measuring the quality of life of young people because it reflects the things most important to their safety, health and freedom, and like all our indexes, it remains independent of economic indicators. This social progress index offers distinct and equally important insight that will be critically helpful in empowering the largest generation ever in their transition from childhood to adulthood. To learn more, visit https://www.youthforum.org/youth-progress-index/.
European Union Regional Social Progress Index Scorecardssocprog
This deck contains the scorecards for each of 272 regions of the 28 member states of the European Union showing performance on each of 50 indicators. Launched October 11, 2016, the EU Index is a three-year collaborative project carried out by the Social Progress Imperative, Orkestra (a research institute on competitiveness in the Basque region) and the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy of the European Commission. The Index aims at providing consistent, comparable and actionable measures of social and environmental issues. Please note that this Index is not created for the purpose of funding allocation and does not bind the European Commission. Explore all the data: http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/custom-indexes/european-union/
Fast-track the end of AIDS in the EU - practical evidence-based interventions.
Presentation by: Valerie Delpech, Public Health Engand
In a two-day meeting under the auspices of the Maltese Presidency of the Council of the European Union (30-31 January 2017), HIV experts from across the European Union discussed how to reverse this trend and how to prepare Europe to achieve the set target of ending AIDS by 2030.
2017 Social Progress Index Findings Presentationsocprog
The 2017 Social Progress Index launched June 21. Though there is a strong relationship between economic performance, as measured by GDP PPP per capita, and performance on the Social Progress Index, some countries achieve much higher social progress relative to countries with similar GDP per capita. For example, Nepal scores 60.08 on the Social Progress Index with a GDP per capita of $2,312, while Yemen, with a GDP per capita of $2,649, scores only 43.46. The Index demonstrates that economic growth is not sufficient for social progress. Countries and communities that want better lives for their citizens need to go beyond economic growth alone in designing their development strategies. Explore the data at http://socialprogressimperative.org.
Social Progress Index 2014 - Country Scorecardssocprog
Each country measured by the Social Progress Index 2014 is more closely analyzed by comparing it to a cohort group of the 15 closest countries in terms of GDP. This allows us to identify areas of under and over performance as suggested by similar GDP, and begin more targeted conversations on the interventions necessary to improve performance.
Leilei Duan: Future challenges and solutions for safety in ChinaTHL
Presentation by Dr. Leilei Duan, Director of the Division of Injury Prevention at the National Center for Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) at Safety 2016 World Conference, 18-21 September 2016, Tampere, Finland
#Safety2016FIN
Nevada profile 2015 stda re'port for cdc#GOMOJO, INC.
Core practices that are moving from a pilot state to implementation at scale: Many of the
barriers facing HIV programs are common across countries. PEPFAR’s ECTs (described below in
Sections 2.3.2 and 2.3.3) identified common issues affecting countries at various levels of
epidemic control and then developed a compendium of evidence-based solutions, approaches
and case-studies that highlight successful means of addressing common barriers. Additional
evidence-based approaches and case-studies will be incorporated into this living compendium
over time. As highlighted in this PEPFAR Solutions Platform, these practices can be rapidly
adapted and scaled to move countries forward.
Key considerations for all PEPFAR programs include:
• Bringing Interventions to Scale with Fidelity: Getting to HIV epidemic control is dependent on
several factors; not the least of which is the ability to rapidly scale successful interventions with
fidelity and demonstrated impact. However, the logistics of cost- effective programmatic scale
have proven challenging, with several implementation barriers. Implementation science
defines scalability as the capacity to expand or extend an intervention to account for a growth
factor that aims to fill a gap or address unmet need in a defined population group/geographic
area.
• Data and Information Technology: The enabling environment for data and information
technology is rapidly maturing across countries, creating space, opportunity, and needed
political will to harness the Data Revolution for epidemic control. OUs should consider
innovative ways to use data and information technology to improve efficiency and
sustainability in achieving epidemic control, beyond immediate PEPFAR indicator data
collection needs. As highlighted in the Data Revolution Innovation Toolkit, available on the
PEPFAR SharePoint, OUs are encouraged to explore, adapt, and scale these and other data
driven approaches to move country epidemic control forward.
"Armed violence reduction within the post-2015 agenda"
Regional Review Conference on the Geneva Declaration on Armed Violence and Development
Geneva, Switzerland | 8-9 July 2014
Population in 2012- 41 million
No of people living with HIV 1.5 million
Kenya ranks no 4, among countries with highest burden of HIV globally
54 % of HIV infections are just in 9 counties
Do you embrace the SDGs? Michael Green at Luxembourg SEsocprog
Social Progress Imperative CEO Michael Green uses Social Progress Index data to assess whether Luxembourg, and the world, are on track to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.
Localization and implementation of the SDGs using the Social Progress Indexsocprog
Presentation by Michael Green, CEO of the Social Progress Imperative, on using the Social Progress Index to support the SDGs and achieve Sustainable and Resilient Societies.
How to build a framework to track SDG progress at a national levelsocprog
Presentation by Minister José Molinas Vega, on how the government of Paraguay used the Social Progress Index to build a framework to track national progress towards the SDGs.
Advancing the SDGs at atate and district level in Indiasocprog
Presentation by Amit Kapoor, President and CEO, India Council on Competitiveness, on how state- and district-level Social Progress Indexes are being used to advance the SDGs in India.
Institute and Faculty of Actuaries Spring Lecture on Social Progress Indexsocprog
Michael Green, CEO of the Social Progress Imperative, presented about the Sustainable Development Goals, and specifically the importance of measuring development in order to drive progress. The Social Progress Imperative has produced scorecards grading countries according to their current progress on the SDGs, and in his lecture he will address the challenges and opportunities associated with using metrics in this way.
Findings from the Social Progress Index: US Statessocprog
The Social Progress Index: US States is an objective, transparent measure that compares quality of life in all 50 states. The Social Progress Index is meant to complement, not replace, economic measures like GDP per capita and Median Household Income. These measures only tell half the story about what life is really like for ordinary Americans. The Social Progress Index™ highlights the issues and the individuals that are invisible when only looking at changes in the economy. The Social Progress Imperative, a US-based nonprofit, created the index to help local officials, businesses and community organizations understand how well people are truly living, how economic changes are affecting quality of life, and what improvements can have the greatest impact on society. To learn more, please visit www.socialprogressimperative.org.
UNGA Week Skoll Foundation | TED We The Future Eventsocprog
Michael Green shares his thoughts from his discussion with the UN Foundation and GSMA at the Skoll Foundation's We The Future Event during the UN General Assembly week.
2017 Indice de Progreso Social Informe Metodologicosocprog
Aunque existe una estrecha relación entre el desempeño económico, medido por el PIB PPA per cápita, 1 y el desempeño en el Índice de Progreso Social, algunos países logran un nivel de progreso social mucho más alto en comparación con países con un PIB per cápita similar. Por ejemplo, Nepal logra un puntaje de 60.08 en el índice de Progreso Social, con un PIB per cápita de $2,312, mientras
que Yemen, con un PIB per cápita de $2,649 logra apenas un 43.46. El Índice demuestra que el crecimiento económico no es suficiente para el progreso social. Países y comunidades que quieren mejores vidas para sus ciudadanos necesitan ir más allá del crecimiento económico a la hora de diseñar sus estrategias de desarrollo.
Aunque existe una estrecha relación entre el desempeño económico, medido por el PIB PPA per cápita, 1 y el desempeño en el Índice de Progreso Social, algunos países logran un nivel de progreso social mucho más alto en comparación con países con un PIB per cápita similar. Por ejemplo, Nepal logra un puntaje de 60.08 en el índice de Progreso Social, con un PIB per cápita de $2,312, mientras
que Yemen, con un PIB per cápita de $2,649 logra apenas un 43.46. El Índice demuestra que el crecimiento económico no es suficiente para el progreso social. Países y comunidades que quieren mejores vidas para sus ciudadanos necesitan ir más allá del crecimiento económico a la hora de diseñar sus estrategias de desarrollo.
Discussion paper: Social Progress Index for States of Indiasocprog
With the partnership of the Social Progress Imperative, the Institute for Competitiveness, India has launched a discussion paper on a Social Progress Index for States of India.
“We are thrilled to support the partnership between NITI Aayog and the Institute for Competitiveness as India works to benchmark social progress in great detail across 28 states and one territory,” said Michael Green, Chief Executive Officer of the Social Progress Imperative. “We look forward to seeing how innovative leaders in government and business use this new map of human wellbeing to improve the lives of people across the subcontinent.”
This exciting development to measure and advance wellbeing in India is an example of the applicability of the Social Progress Index to improve social progress around the world.
Professor Michael E Porter on Competitiveness of Nations and Regions: The New...socprog
Advisor to the Social Progress Imperative Professor Michael E Porter shared this presentation at the India National Competitiveness Forum in New Delhi on May 25, 2017. The Social Progress Index is referenced on slides 12-14. For more information on the Social Progress Index, please visit http://socialprogressimperative.org.
Michael Green on the Social Progress Index at Business in the Community Irelandsocprog
On May 11, 2017 CEO of the Social Progress Imperative Michael Green joined CEOs and Managing Directors of BITC’s member companies to explore why economic growth, measured as GDP, is failing as an accurate predictor of a nation’s progress, and assess the business implications, together with what new measures will support Irish business to thrive in the long term. Learn more at http://socialprogressimperative.org
Social Progress Imperative CEO Michael Green presented at the UK Stakeholders for Sustainable Development Annual Conference on Mar 1, 2017. He presented Social Progress Index data for various countries and the world as a whole that shows it IS possible for the global community to achieve the new United Nations Sustainable Development Goals by 2030 - but not with business as usual. To learn more about the Social Progress Index and the Social Progress Imperative, please visit http:socialprogressimperative.org.
Social Progress Imperative CEO Michael Green presented at the Imagine Solutions Conference on February 27, 2017. He introduced the increasingly popular Social Progress Index, explained its use in communities ranging from the Brazilian Amazon to the European Union, and offered a preview of what a Social Progress Index for the United States at the state or intra-state level of detail might offer those looking to advance social progress in that country.
Social Progress Imperative Vice Chair Roberto Artavia Loria presented at "Social Progress in Latin America" on February 16, 2017, an event hosted by the Social Progress Imperative and the the Latin American Program of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Artavia presented several uses of the Social Progress Index in communities across Latin America. Watch the video of the whole event here: http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/livestream-from-wilson-center-event-social-progress-in-latin-america/
CEO of the Social Progress Imperative Michael Green presented at "Social Progress in Latin America" at the Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, DC on Feb 16, 2017. For more information on the Social Progress Index and the Social Progress Imperative, please visit our website at socialprogressimperative.org
Unleashing the Power of Data_ Choosing a Trusted Analytics Platform.pdfEnterprise Wired
In this guide, we'll explore the key considerations and features to look for when choosing a Trusted analytics platform that meets your organization's needs and delivers actionable intelligence you can trust.
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
The Building Blocks of QuestDB, a Time Series Databasejavier ramirez
Talk Delivered at Valencia Codes Meetup 2024-06.
Traditionally, databases have treated timestamps just as another data type. However, when performing real-time analytics, timestamps should be first class citizens and we need rich time semantics to get the most out of our data. We also need to deal with ever growing datasets while keeping performant, which is as fun as it sounds.
It is no wonder time-series databases are now more popular than ever before. Join me in this session to learn about the internal architecture and building blocks of QuestDB, an open source time-series database designed for speed. We will also review a history of some of the changes we have gone over the past two years to deal with late and unordered data, non-blocking writes, read-replicas, or faster batch ingestion.
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
Graph algorithms, like PageRank Compressed Sparse Row (CSR) is an adjacency-list based graph representation that is
Multiply with different modes (map)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector multiply.
2. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector multiply.
Sum with different storage types (reduce)
1. Performance of vector element sum using float vs bfloat16 as the storage type.
Sum with different modes (reduce)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector element sum.
2. Performance of memcpy vs in-place based CUDA based vector element sum.
3. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (memcpy).
4. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Sum with in-place strategies of CUDA mode (reduce)
1. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Enhanced Enterprise Intelligence with your personal AI Data Copilot.pdfGetInData
Recently we have observed the rise of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) that are community-driven or developed by the AI market leaders, such as Meta (Llama3), Databricks (DBRX) and Snowflake (Arctic). On the other hand, there is a growth in interest in specialized, carefully fine-tuned yet relatively small models that can efficiently assist programmers in day-to-day tasks. Finally, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architectures have gained a lot of traction as the preferred approach for LLMs context and prompt augmentation for building conversational SQL data copilots, code copilots and chatbots.
In this presentation, we will show how we built upon these three concepts a robust Data Copilot that can help to democratize access to company data assets and boost performance of everyone working with data platforms.
Why do we need yet another (open-source ) Copilot?
How can we build one?
Architecture and evaluation
06-04-2024 - NYC Tech Week - Discussion on Vector Databases, Unstructured Data and AI
Round table discussion of vector databases, unstructured data, ai, big data, real-time, robots and Milvus.
A lively discussion with NJ Gen AI Meetup Lead, Prasad and Procure.FYI's Co-Found
Learn SQL from basic queries to Advance queriesmanishkhaire30
Dive into the world of data analysis with our comprehensive guide on mastering SQL! This presentation offers a practical approach to learning SQL, focusing on real-world applications and hands-on practice. Whether you're a beginner or looking to sharpen your skills, this guide provides the tools you need to extract, analyze, and interpret data effectively.
Key Highlights:
Foundations of SQL: Understand the basics of SQL, including data retrieval, filtering, and aggregation.
Advanced Queries: Learn to craft complex queries to uncover deep insights from your data.
Data Trends and Patterns: Discover how to identify and interpret trends and patterns in your datasets.
Practical Examples: Follow step-by-step examples to apply SQL techniques in real-world scenarios.
Actionable Insights: Gain the skills to derive actionable insights that drive informed decision-making.
Join us on this journey to enhance your data analysis capabilities and unlock the full potential of SQL. Perfect for data enthusiasts, analysts, and anyone eager to harness the power of data!
#DataAnalysis #SQL #LearningSQL #DataInsights #DataScience #Analytics
1. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Top 10 Countries With Highest Health and Wellness Score
RELATION BETWEEN HEALTH AND
WELLNESS AND ECOSYSTEM
SUSTAINABILITY IN THE 2014 SOCIAL
PROGRESS INDEX
2. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 1/132
GDP per capita rank: 22/132 NEW ZEALAND
Spain; Italy; Israel; United Kingdom; Japan; Korea, Republic of; Trinidad and Tobago; France; Slovenia; Czech Republic; Finland;
Iceland; Slovakia; Greece; and Belgium
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 91.74 18 N FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 84.97 6 S OPPORTUNITY 88.01 1 S+
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 97.57 28 N Access to Basic Knowledge 99.49 2 S Personal Rights 98.80 1 S
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 99.0 21 N Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 13 41 N Primary school enrollment 99.1 11 N Freedom of speech 2.0 1 S+
Maternal mortality rate 15 36 W Lower secondary school enrollment 105.0 1 N Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 4 25 N Upper secondary school enrollment 138.3 1 N Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 6 31 N Gender parity in secondary enrollment 1.0 1 N Private property rights 95.0 1 S
Deaths from infectious diseases 15 3 N
Water and Sanitation 100.00 1 N Access to Information and Communications 96.74 7 S Personal Freedom and Choice 94.00 1 S+
Access to piped water 100 1 N Mobile telephone subscriptions 110.4 1 N Freedom over life choices 94.0 2 S
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 0.0 1 N Internet users 89.5 7 S Freedom of religion 4.0 1 S
Access to improved sanitation facilities n/a n/a Press Freedom Index 8.4 1 S+ Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 1.1 4 N
Satisfied demand for contraception 89.1 27 N
Corruption 91.0 1 S+
Shelter 83.23 21 N Health and Wellness 77.81 35 N Tolerance and Inclusion 82.41 4 S+
Availability of affordable housing 49 50 N Life expectancy 80.9 14 N Women treated with respect 82.0 21 S
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 13.0 17 N Tolerance for immigrants 87.0 2 S
Quality of electricity supply 6.1 24 N Obesity rate 27.0 115 N Tolerance for homosexuals 69.0 10 N
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 14.0 71 N Discrimination and violence against minorities 3.5 11 N
Suicide rate 10.6 76 N Religious tolerance 4.0 1 S
Community safety net 96.0 2 S
Personal Safety 86.13 17 N Ecosystem Sustainability 65.84 32 N Access to Advanced Education 76.84 4 S
Homicide rate 1.0 1 N Greenhouse gas emissions 703.3 2 N Years of tertiary schooling 1.5 3 S+
Level of violent crime 2.0 19 N Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 1.4 61 S Women's average years in school 13.6 10 N
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 76.1 45 N Inequality in the attainment of education n/a n/a
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 3.0 12 N
Traffic deaths 9.1 27 N
3. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 2/132
GDP per capita rank: 4/132 SWITZERLAND
United States; Saudi Arabia; United Arab Emirates; Austria; Ireland; Netherlands; Australia; Germany; Sweden; Denmark; Canada;
Norway; Belgium; Iceland; and Finland
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 94.87 2 N FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 89.78 1 S OPPORTUNITY 79.92 12 N
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 98.33 9 N Access to Basic Knowledge 94.81 45 W- Personal Rights 87.96 9 N
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 99.0 21 N Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 4 17 N Primary school enrollment 93.6 66 W Freedom of speech 1.0 14 N
Maternal mortality rate 8 20 N Lower secondary school enrollment 110.2 1 N Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 3 6 N Upper secondary school enrollment 86.3 53 W- Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 4 20 N Gender parity in secondary enrollment 1.0 78 W Private property rights 90.0 2 N
Deaths from infectious diseases 17 6 N
Water and Sanitation 99.92 14 N Access to Information and Communications 95.41 8 N Personal Freedom and Choice 93.19 3 N
Access to piped water 100 12 N Mobile telephone subscriptions 130.2 1 N Freedom over life choices 94.0 2 N
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 0.0 1 N Internet users 85.2 10 N Freedom of religion 4.0 1 N
Access to improved sanitation facilities 100.0 1 N Press Freedom Index 9.9 1 N Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 1.1 5 N
Satisfied demand for contraception 92.1 13 N
Corruption 85.0 6 N
Shelter 88.48 7 N Health and Wellness 82.78 3 S Tolerance and Inclusion 74.25 12 N
Availability of affordable housing 56 27 N Life expectancy 82.7 1 S Women treated with respect 90.0 7 S
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 10.0 1 S Tolerance for immigrants 70.0 35 W
Quality of electricity supply 6.8 1 S Obesity rate 14.9 45 S Tolerance for homosexuals 65.0 16 N
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 11.0 48 N Discrimination and violence against minorities 3.5 11 N
Suicide rate 14.8 107 W Religious tolerance 3.0 38 N
Community safety net 94.0 4 N
Personal Safety 92.75 3 N Ecosystem Sustainability 86.13 1 S+ Access to Advanced Education 64.30 18 N
Homicide rate 1.0 1 N Greenhouse gas emissions 170.5 1 S+ Years of tertiary schooling 0.6 30 N
Level of violent crime 1.0 1 N Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 1.1 51 N Women's average years in school 13.0 23 N
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 100.0 1 S Inequality in the attainment of education 0.0 3 N
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 3.0 12 N
Traffic deaths 4.3 5 N
4. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 3/132
GDP per capita rank: 16/132 ICELAND
Finland; Belgium; Canada; France; Denmark; Sweden; Germany; Japan; Australia; United Kingdom; Netherlands; Ireland; Austria;
Italy; and New Zealand
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 94.32 7 N FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 88.19 2 S OPPORTUNITY 81.71 9 N
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 98.78 1 N Access to Basic Knowledge 98.65 10 N Personal Rights 87.96 9 N
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 99.0 21 N Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 6 23 N Primary school enrollment 98.5 20 N Freedom of speech 1.0 14 N
Maternal mortality rate 5 7 N Lower secondary school enrollment 97.0 61 W- Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 2 1 S Upper secondary school enrollment 116.8 1 N Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 2 1 S+ Gender parity in secondary enrollment 1.0 1 N Private property rights 90.0 2 N
Deaths from infectious diseases 18 9 N
Water and Sanitation 100.00 1 N Access to Information and Communications 98.82 1 S Personal Freedom and Choice 87.59 11 N
Access to piped water 100 1 N Mobile telephone subscriptions 108.1 1 N Freedom over life choices 87.0 20 N
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 0.0 1 N Internet users 96.2 1 S Freedom of religion 3.0 56 N
Access to improved sanitation facilities 100.0 1 N Press Freedom Index 8.5 1 S Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 1.0 1 N
Satisfied demand for contraception n/a n/a
Corruption 78.0 10 N
Shelter 85.05 16 N Health and Wellness 81.62 7 N Tolerance and Inclusion 88.44 1 S
Availability of affordable housing 43 73 W Life expectancy 82.4 3 S+ Women treated with respect 80.0 25 N
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 10.0 1 S Tolerance for immigrants 78.0 15 N
Quality of electricity supply 6.7 2 N Obesity rate 21.9 86 N Tolerance for homosexuals 79.0 4 S
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 14.0 71 N Discrimination and violence against minorities 1.0 1 S+
Suicide rate 9.2 63 N Religious tolerance 4.0 1 S
Community safety net 98.0 1 S+
Personal Safety 93.45 1 S Ecosystem Sustainability 73.65 13 S Access to Advanced Education 62.84 21 W
Homicide rate 1.0 1 N Greenhouse gas emissions 407.9 2 N Years of tertiary schooling 0.9 14 N
Level of violent crime 1.0 1 S Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 0.1 20 S Women's average years in school n/a n/a
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 81.9 35 N Inequality in the attainment of education 0.0 9 N
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 1.0 35 W-
Traffic deaths 2.8 1 S
5. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 4/132
GDP per capita rank: 9/132 NETHERLANDS
Australia; Ireland; Germany; Sweden; Austria; Denmark; Canada; Belgium; Iceland; Finland; France; Japan; United Kingdom; Saudi
Arabia; and United States
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 93.91 8 N FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 87.56 3 S OPPORTUNITY 80.63 11 N
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 98.16 17 N Access to Basic Knowledge 99.26 6 N Personal Rights 87.96 9 N
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 99.0 21 N Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 8 29 N Primary school enrollment 99.7 4 N Freedom of speech 1.0 14 N
Maternal mortality rate 6 12 N Lower secondary school enrollment 134.3 1 N Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 3 6 N Upper secondary school enrollment 122.7 1 N Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 4 15 N Gender parity in secondary enrollment 1.0 61 N Private property rights 90.0 2 N
Deaths from infectious diseases 28 25 N
Water and Sanitation 100.00 1 N Access to Information and Communications 97.83 4 S Personal Freedom and Choice 89.44 9 N
Access to piped water 100 1 N Mobile telephone subscriptions 118.0 1 N Freedom over life choices 87.0 20 N
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 0.0 1 N Internet users 93.0 4 S Freedom of religion 4.0 1 S
Access to improved sanitation facilities 100.0 1 N Press Freedom Index 6.5 1 N Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 2.1 20 N
Satisfied demand for contraception 86.5 43 N
Corruption 83.0 7 N
Shelter 88.92 4 N Health and Wellness 81.29 10 N Tolerance and Inclusion 75.45 10 N
Availability of affordable housing 59 22 N Life expectancy 81.2 11 N Women treated with respect 86.0 14 N
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 13.0 17 N Tolerance for immigrants 79.0 13 N
Quality of electricity supply 6.7 2 S Obesity rate 16.2 47 N Tolerance for homosexuals 85.0 1 S
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 16.0 83 N Discrimination and violence against minorities 4.1 25 N
Suicide rate 8.5 61 N Religious tolerance 2.0 82 W
Community safety net 94.0 4 N
Personal Safety 88.56 12 N Ecosystem Sustainability 71.85 18 S Access to Advanced Education 69.67 10 N
Homicide rate 1.0 1 N Greenhouse gas emissions 465.9 2 N Years of tertiary schooling 0.8 20 N
Level of violent crime 2.0 19 W Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 1.7 69 N Women's average years in school 12.6 30 N
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 94.7 12 S Inequality in the attainment of education 0.0 19 N
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 4.0 3 N
Traffic deaths 3.9 4 N
6. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 5/132
GDP per capita rank: 2/132 NORWAY
United Arab Emirates; Switzerland; United States; Saudi Arabia; Austria; Ireland; Netherlands; Australia; Germany; Sweden; Kuwait;
Denmark; Canada; Belgium; and Iceland
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 93.59 10 N FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 86.94 4 N OPPORTUNITY 80.82 10 N
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 98.71 3 N Access to Basic Knowledge 99.44 3 S Personal Rights 87.96 9 N
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 100.0 1 N Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 3 12 N Primary school enrollment 99.3 10 N Freedom of speech 1.0 14 N
Maternal mortality rate 7 16 N Lower secondary school enrollment 100.1 1 N Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 2 1 S Upper secondary school enrollment 125.7 1 N Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 3 2 N Gender parity in secondary enrollment 1.0 61 N Private property rights 90.0 2 N
Deaths from infectious diseases 27 23 N
Water and Sanitation 100.00 1 N Access to Information and Communications 98.45 2 S Personal Freedom and Choice 93.27 2 N
Access to piped water 100 1 N Mobile telephone subscriptions 116.7 1 N Freedom over life choices 92.0 7 N
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 0.0 1 N Internet users 95.0 2 S Freedom of religion 4.0 1 S
Access to improved sanitation facilities 100.0 1 N Press Freedom Index 6.5 1 N Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 1.1 5 N
Satisfied demand for contraception 93.7 5 N
Corruption 86.0 5 N
Shelter 82.93 22 W Health and Wellness 81.60 8 N Tolerance and Inclusion 74.50 11 N
Availability of affordable housing 35 99 W- Life expectancy 81.3 10 N Women treated with respect 86.0 14 N
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 12.0 9 N Tolerance for immigrants 74.0 24 N
Quality of electricity supply 6.6 8 N Obesity rate 19.8 70 N Tolerance for homosexuals 66.0 14 N
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 10.0 46 N Discrimination and violence against minorities 3.6 15 N
Suicide rate 10.4 72 N Religious tolerance 3.0 38 N
Community safety net 93.0 9 N
Personal Safety 92.75 3 N Ecosystem Sustainability 68.26 28 N Access to Advanced Education 67.57 15 N
Homicide rate 1.0 1 N Greenhouse gas emissions 243.7 2 N Years of tertiary schooling 0.9 16 N
Level of violent crime 1.0 1 N Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 0.4 30 S Women's average years in school 14.9 2 S
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 71.7 48 N Inequality in the attainment of education 0.0 3 N
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 2.0 22 N
Traffic deaths 4.3 5 N
7. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 6/132
GDP per capita rank: 12/132 SWEDEN
Germany; Denmark; Australia; Netherlands; Ireland; Canada; Austria; Belgium; Iceland; Finland; France; Japan; United Kingdom; Italy;
and Saudi Arabia
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 94.59 5 N FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 84.71 9 S OPPORTUNITY 81.95 7 N
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 98.26 13 N Access to Basic Knowledge 98.16 15 N Personal Rights 87.96 9 N
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 99.0 21 N Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 12 39 W Primary school enrollment 99.5 9 N Freedom of speech 1.0 14 N
Maternal mortality rate 4 3 N Lower secondary school enrollment 96.7 62 W- Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 3 6 N Upper secondary school enrollment 97.1 33 W- Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 3 3 S Gender parity in secondary enrollment 1.0 61 N Private property rights 90.0 2 N
Deaths from infectious diseases 20 11 N
Water and Sanitation 100.00 1 N Access to Information and Communications 98.14 3 S Personal Freedom and Choice 93.08 5 N
Access to piped water 100 1 N Mobile telephone subscriptions 124.6 1 N Freedom over life choices 93.0 4 N
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 0.0 1 N Internet users 94.0 3 S Freedom of religion 4.0 1 S
Access to improved sanitation facilities 100.0 1 N Press Freedom Index 9.2 1 N Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 1.1 5 N
Satisfied demand for contraception 88.3 33 N
Corruption 89.0 3 S
Shelter 86.74 11 N Health and Wellness 82.15 4 N Tolerance and Inclusion 78.13 8 N
Availability of affordable housing 54 33 N Life expectancy 81.8 6 N Women treated with respect 73.0 37 W
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 11.0 4 N Tolerance for immigrants 80.0 10 N
Quality of electricity supply 6.5 10 N Obesity rate 16.6 51 N Tolerance for homosexuals 69.0 10 N
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 12.0 58 N Discrimination and violence against minorities 1.0 1 S+
Suicide rate 12.0 89 N Religious tolerance 2.0 82 W
Community safety net 92.0 17 N
Personal Safety 93.35 2 N Ecosystem Sustainability 60.42 48 N Access to Advanced Education 68.63 11 N
Homicide rate 1.0 1 N Greenhouse gas emissions 231.2 2 N Years of tertiary schooling 0.8 17 N
Level of violent crime 1.0 1 S Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 1.3 58 N Women's average years in school 13.9 4 N
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 62.4 70 N Inequality in the attainment of education 0.0 19 N
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 3.0 12 N
Traffic deaths 3.0 2 N
8. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 7/132
GDP per capita rank: 14/132 CANADA
Denmark; Belgium; Sweden; Germany; Australia; Netherlands; Iceland; Ireland; Finland; Austria; France; Japan; United Kingdom;
Italy; and New Zealand
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 93.52 11 N FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 80.31 17 N OPPORTUNITY 87.02 2 S
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 98.10 21 N Access to Basic Knowledge 98.00 17 N Personal Rights 87.96 9 N
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 99.0 21 N Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 5 20 N Primary school enrollment n/a n/a Freedom of speech 1.0 14 N
Maternal mortality rate 12 29 W- Lower secondary school enrollment 99.9 46 N Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 3 6 N Upper secondary school enrollment 103.5 1 N Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 5 28 W Gender parity in secondary enrollment 1.0 68 W Private property rights 90.0 2 N
Deaths from infectious diseases 23 17 N
Water and Sanitation 95.76 35 W- Access to Information and Communications 83.23 20 N Personal Freedom and Choice 91.14 6 N
Access to piped water 88 49 W- Mobile telephone subscriptions 80.1 99 W- Freedom over life choices 92.0 7 N
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 1.0 37 W- Internet users 86.8 9 N Freedom of religion 4.0 1 N
Access to improved sanitation facilities 99.8 26 W- Press Freedom Index 12.7 12 N Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 1.7 18 N
Satisfied demand for contraception 90.2 22 N
Corruption 81.0 8 N
Shelter 88.64 5 N Health and Wellness 80.78 13 N Tolerance and Inclusion 86.79 2 S
Availability of affordable housing 63 11 N Life expectancy 81.1 12 N Women treated with respect 85.0 16 N
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 12.0 9 N Tolerance for immigrants 93.0 1 S+
Quality of electricity supply 6.5 10 N Obesity rate 24.3 100 W Tolerance for homosexuals 81.0 2 S
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 7.0 31 S+ Discrimination and violence against minorities 3.1 7 N
Suicide rate 10.9 81 N Religious tolerance 4.0 1 S
Community safety net 94.0 4 N
Personal Safety 91.58 9 N Ecosystem Sustainability 59.21 51 N Access to Advanced Education 82.21 2 S+
Homicide rate 1.0 1 N Greenhouse gas emissions 604.5 2 N Years of tertiary schooling 1.3 4 S+
Level of violent crime 1.0 1 S Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 1.2 54 N Women's average years in school 15.0 1 S+
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 58.4 76 N Inequality in the attainment of education 0.0 9 N
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 4.0 3 N
Traffic deaths 6.8 19 W
9. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 8/132
GDP per capita rank: 17/132 FINLAND
Iceland; Belgium; France; Canada; Japan; United Kingdom; Denmark; Sweden; Germany; Australia; Netherlands; Italy; Ireland;
Austria; and New Zealand
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 94.63 4 N FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 84.17 11 N OPPORTUNITY 81.92 8 N
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 98.74 2 N Access to Basic Knowledge 99.25 7 N Personal Rights 87.96 9 N
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 100.0 1 S+ Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 8 29 N Primary school enrollment 98.2 26 N Freedom of speech 1.0 14 N
Maternal mortality rate 5 7 N Lower secondary school enrollment 99.3 49 W Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 2 1 S Upper secondary school enrollment 115.1 1 N Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 3 3 S Gender parity in secondary enrollment 1.0 1 N Private property rights 90.0 2 N
Deaths from infectious diseases 11 1 S
Water and Sanitation 99.83 17 N Access to Information and Communications 97.21 6 S Personal Freedom and Choice 93.10 4 S
Access to piped water 99 20 N Mobile telephone subscriptions 172.3 1 N Freedom over life choices 91.0 11 N
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 0.0 1 N Internet users 91.0 6 N Freedom of religion 4.0 1 N
Access to improved sanitation facilities 100.0 1 N Press Freedom Index 6.4 1 S Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 1.1 5 N
Satisfied demand for contraception 90.7 18 N
Corruption 89.0 3 S
Shelter 90.66 2 S Health and Wellness 78.60 24 W Tolerance and Inclusion 78.74 5 N
Availability of affordable housing 67 6 S Life expectancy 80.5 20 N Women treated with respect 84.0 17 N
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 12.0 9 N Tolerance for immigrants 72.0 29 N
Quality of electricity supply 6.7 2 N Obesity rate 19.9 72 N Tolerance for homosexuals 66.0 14 N
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 11.0 48 N Discrimination and violence against minorities 1.4 3 S+
Suicide rate 18.0 114 W- Religious tolerance 3.0 38 N
Community safety net 92.0 17 N
Personal Safety 89.29 11 N Ecosystem Sustainability 61.63 46 N Access to Advanced Education 67.89 12 N
Homicide rate 2.0 41 W- Greenhouse gas emissions 413.5 2 N Years of tertiary schooling 0.8 21 N
Level of violent crime 1.0 1 S Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 1.0 48 N Women's average years in school 13.4 12 N
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 61.9 72 N Inequality in the attainment of education 0.0 3 N
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 3.0 12 N
Traffic deaths 5.1 11 N
10. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 9/132
GDP per capita rank: 13/132 DENMARK
Sweden; Germany; Australia; Netherlands; Canada; Ireland; Austria; Belgium; Iceland; Finland; France; Japan; United Kingdom; Italy;
and New Zealand
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 95.73 1 S FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 84.82 8 N OPPORTUNITY 79.10 13 N
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 98.53 5 N Access to Basic Knowledge 98.41 11 N Personal Rights 87.96 9 N
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 99.0 21 N Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 4 17 N Primary school enrollment 95.9 49 W- Freedom of speech 1.0 14 N
Maternal mortality rate 12 29 W- Lower secondary school enrollment 117.4 1 N Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 2 1 S Upper secondary school enrollment 121.6 1 N Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 4 9 N Gender parity in secondary enrollment 1.0 1 N Private property rights 90.0 2 N
Deaths from infectious diseases 27 23 N
Water and Sanitation 100.00 1 N Access to Information and Communications 97.83 4 S Personal Freedom and Choice 90.76 7 N
Access to piped water 100 1 N Mobile telephone subscriptions 117.6 1 N Freedom over life choices 92.0 7 N
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 0.0 1 N Internet users 93.0 4 S Freedom of religion 3.0 56 N
Access to improved sanitation facilities 100.0 1 N Press Freedom Index 7.1 1 S Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 1.1 5 N
Satisfied demand for contraception 88.9 29 N
Corruption 91.0 1 S
Shelter 91.81 1 S+ Health and Wellness 78.84 22 W Tolerance and Inclusion 76.64 9 N
Availability of affordable housing 72 3 S+ Life expectancy 79.8 24 W Women treated with respect 91.0 6 S
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 15.0 32 W- Tolerance for immigrants 77.0 16 N
Quality of electricity supply 6.7 2 N Obesity rate 16.2 47 N Tolerance for homosexuals 67.0 12 N
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 16.0 83 N Discrimination and violence against minorities 3.4 10 N
Suicide rate 11.8 87 N Religious tolerance 3.0 38 N
Community safety net 94.0 4 N
Personal Safety 92.56 5 S Ecosystem Sustainability 64.19 34 N Access to Advanced Education 61.02 23 W
Homicide rate 1.0 1 N Greenhouse gas emissions 322.5 2 N Years of tertiary schooling 0.6 29 N
Level of violent crime 1.0 1 S Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 1.0 47 N Women's average years in school 13.4 12 N
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 67.7 55 N Inequality in the attainment of education 0.0 9 N
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 2.0 22 W
Traffic deaths 4.7 7 N
11. www.socialprogressimperative.org
Relative Strength Neutral Relative Weakness
Strengths and weaknesses are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP:
n/a – no data available
Social Progress Index rank: 10/132
GDP per capita rank: 10/132 AUSTRALIA
Netherlands; Germany; Sweden; Ireland; Denmark; Austria; Canada; Belgium; Iceland; Finland; France; Japan; United Kingdom;
Saudi Arabia; and United States
Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank
BASIC HUMAN NEEDS 92.47 14 N FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING 80.27 18 N OPPORTUNITY 85.54 3 N
Nutrition and Basic Medical Care 98.28 11 N Access to Basic Knowledge 96.80 29 W Personal Rights 97.60 2 S
Undernourishment <5.0 1 N Adult literacy rate 99.0 21 N Political rights 1.0 1 N
Depth of food deficit 4 17 N Primary school enrollment 96.4 43 W Freedom of speech 2.0 1 S+
Maternal mortality rate 7 16 N Lower secondary school enrollment 111.6 1 N Freedom of assembly/association 2.0 1 N
Stillbirth rate 3 6 N Upper secondary school enrollment 174.5 1 N Freedom of movement 4.0 1 N
Child mortality rate 5 25 N Gender parity in secondary enrollment 0.9 89 W- Private property rights 90.0 2 N
Deaths from infectious diseases 18 9 N
Water and Sanitation 99.94 12 N Access to Information and Communications 83.36 19 N Personal Freedom and Choice 90.56 8 N
Access to piped water n/a n/a Mobile telephone subscriptions 105.6 1 N Freedom over life choices 93.0 4 N
Rural vs. urban access to improved water source 0.0 1 N Internet users 82.3 15 N Freedom of religion 4.0 1 S
Access to improved sanitation facilities 100.0 1 N Press Freedom Index 15.2 21 N Modern slavery, human trafficking, child marriage 2.2 22 N
Satisfied demand for contraception 87.0 40 N
Corruption 81.0 8 N
Shelter 84.12 18 W Health and Wellness 81.79 5 N Tolerance and Inclusion 78.70 6 N
Availability of affordable housing 50 44 N Life expectancy 81.8 6 N Women treated with respect 83.0 20 N
Access to electricity 100.0 1 N Non-communicable disease deaths between 30 and 70 11.0 4 N Tolerance for immigrants 87.0 2 S
Quality of electricity supply 6.2 21 W Obesity rate 25.1 111 N Tolerance for homosexuals 72.0 8 N
Indoor air pollution attributable deaths 0.0 1 N Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths 7.0 31 S+ Discrimination and violence against minorities 3.6 15 N
Suicide rate 9.3 65 N Religious tolerance 3.0 38 N
Community safety net 93.0 9 N
Personal Safety 87.53 15 N Ecosystem Sustainability 59.14 52 N Access to Advanced Education 75.32 6 S
Homicide rate 1.0 1 N Greenhouse gas emissions 769.1 2 N Years of tertiary schooling 1.1 9 S
Level of violent crime 2.0 19 W Water withdrawals as a percent of resources 3.5 109 W Women's average years in school 12.5 33 W
Perceived criminality 2.0 2 N Biodiversity and habitat 83.1 34 N Inequality in the attainment of education 0.0 3 N
Political terror 1.0 1 N Number of globally ranked universities 4.0 3 N
Traffic deaths 6.1 14 N