What does the Social Progress Index tell us?
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•731 views
Michael Green's presentation to the 2018 Candriam Investors Seminar.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to What does the Social Progress Index tell us?
Similar to What does the Social Progress Index tell us? (20)
More from socprog
More from socprog (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
What does the Social Progress Index tell us?
- 1. What does the Social Progress Index tell us? Candriam Investors Seminar 7 June 2018
- 2. “Economic growth alone is not sufficient to advance societies and improve the quality of life of citizens. True success, and growth that is inclusive requires achieving both economic and social progress.” – Social Progress Imperative Advisory Board Chair Michael E. Porter
- 4. The Social Progress Index design principles
- 5. The Social Progress framework answers universally important questions
- 6. Realizing the promise of the Sustainable Development Goals The Social Progress Index captures outcomes related to 16 of the 17 SDGs in a simple but rigorous framework designed for aggregation, making it an invaluable proxy measure of SDG performance, particularly for areas where official indicators do not exist
- 7. The Social Progress Index is designed to reflect a broad consensus about what a healthy, successful society looks like in the 21st century. The global index includes data from 128 countries on 50 indicators of social and environmental outcomes
- 8. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita
- 9. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Denmark
- 10. Central African Republic Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Denmark
- 11. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Denmark Central African Republic United States
- 12. United States Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Denmark Central African Republic Senegal
- 13. United States Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Denmark Central African Republic Senegal
- 14. United States Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Netherlands Denmark Central African Republic Senegal
- 15. United States Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita NetherlandsUnited Kingdom Denmark Central African Republic Senegal
- 16. United States Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Netherlands France United Kingdom Denmark Central African Republic Senegal
- 17. United States Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Netherlands Belgium France United Kingdom Denmark Central African Republic Senegal
- 18. United States Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Netherlands Belgium France United Kingdom Spain Denmark Central African Republic Senegal
- 19. United States Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Netherlands Belgium Italy France United Kingdom Spain Denmark Central African Republic Senegal
- 20. Brazil Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita France United Kingdom Netherlands Belgium Spain Italy Denmark United States Central African Republic Senegal
- 21. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Brazil France United Kingdom Netherlands Belgium Spain Italy Denmark United States Central African Republic South Africa Senegal
- 22. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Russia Brazil France United Kingdom Netherlands Belgium Spain Italy Denmark United States Central African Republic South Africa Senegal
- 23. China Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita Russia Brazil France United Kingdom Netherlands Belgium Spain Italy Denmark United States Central African Republic South Africa Senegal
- 24. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita China Russia Brazil France United Kingdom Netherlands Belgium Spain Italy Denmark United States Central African Republic South Africa India Senegal
- 25. Kuwait Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita China Russia Brazil France United Kingdom Netherlands Belgium Spain Italy Denmark United States Central African Republic South Africa India Senegal
- 26. Kuwait Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita India China Russia Brazil France United Kingdom Netherlands Belgium Spain Italy Denmark United States Central African Republic Senegal South Africa Costa Rica
- 27. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita
- 28. SCORE RANK 2017Social ProgressIndex 86.43 18/128 GDPPPPpercapita $52,704 5/128 SCORE/ VALUE RANK STRENGTH/ WEAKNESS BasicHumanNeeds 93.42 17 NutritionandBasicMedical Care 98.96 36 Undernourishment (%of pop.; 5 signifies ≤ 5) 5.00 1 Depthoffooddefcit (calories/undernourished person; 8 signifies ≤ 8) 8.00 1 Maternal mortalityrate(deaths/100,000 live births) 13.75 39 Childmortalityrate(deaths/1,000 live births) 6.50 35 Deathsfrominfectiousdiseases (deaths/100,000) 23.33 34 WaterandSanitation 98.77 27 Accesstopipedwater (%of pop.) 98.64 30 Rural accesstoimprovedwater source (%of pop.) 98.16 44 Accesstoimprovedsanitationfacilities (%of pop.) 99.99 10 Shelter 89.18 10 Availabilityofaf ordablehousing(%satisfied) 56.68 30 Accesstoelectricity(%of pop.) 100.00 1 Qualityofelectricitysupply(1=low; 7=high) 6.47 13 Householdair pollutionattributabledeaths (deaths/100,000) 0.00 1 Personal Safety 86.76 21 Homiciderate(deaths/100,000) 3.90 70 Level ofviolent crime(1=low; 5=high) 1.00 1 Perceivedcriminality(1=low; 5=high) 2.00 1 Political terror (1=low; 5=high) 2.00 34 Traf cdeaths(deaths/100,000) 10.60 40 SCORE/ VALUE RANK STRENGTH/ WEAKNESS Foundationsof Wellbeing 84.19 29 AccesstoBasicKnowledge 97.95 30 Adult literacyrate(%of pop. aged 15+) Primaryschool enrollment (%of children) 98.04 53 Secondaryschool enrollment (%of children) 97.56 50 Gender parityinsecondaryenrollment (distance from parity) 0.02 32 AccesstoInformation andCommunications 84.63 27 Mobiletelephonesubscriptions (subscriptions/100 people) 100.00 1 Internet users(%of pop.) 74.45 27 PressFreedomIndex (0=most free; 100=least free) 22.49 32 HealthandWellness 75.88 34 Lifeexpectancyat 60 (years) 23.61 27 Prematuredeathsfromnon-communicable diseases(deaths/100,000) 299.40 42 Suiciderate(deaths/100,000) 12.41 82 Environmental Quality 78.31 33 Outdoor air pollutionattributabledeaths (deaths/100,000) 18.48 13 Wastewater treatment (%of wastewater) 50.44 36 Biodiversityandhabitat (0=no protection; 100=high protection) 79.35 73 Greenhousegasemissions (CO2 equivalents per GDP) 392.70 60 SCORE/ VALUE RANK STRENGTH/ WEAKNESS Opportunity 81.68 13 Personal Rights 88.98 19 Political rights(0=no rights; 40=full rights) 36.00 32 Freedomofexpression (0=no freedom; 16=full freedom) 16.00 1 Freedomofassembly (0=no freedom; 1=full freedom) 0.86 14 Privatepropertyrights(0=none; 100=full) 80.00 17 Personal FreedomandChoice 79.88 19 Freedomover lifechoices(%satisfied) 75.48 65 Freedomofreligion(1=low; 4=high) 3.00 54 Earlymarriage(%of women aged 15-19) 3.00 32 Satisfeddemandfor contraception (%of women) 85.10 13 Corruption(0=high; 100=low) 74.00 15 ToleranceandInclusion 68.30 23 Tolerancefor immigrants(0=low; 100=high) 78.78 16 Tolerancefor homosexuals(0=low; 100=high) 71.34 19 Discriminationandviolenceagainst minorities(0=low; 10=high) 5.10 39 Religioustolerance(1=low; 4=high) 2.00 92 Communitysafetynet (0=low; 100=high) 89.58 31 AccesstoAdvancedEducation 89.55 1 Yearsoftertiaryschooling 1.86 3 Women’saverageyearsinschool 15.06 7 Inequalityintheattainment ofeducation (0=low; 1=high) 0.05 28 Number ofgloballyrankeduniversities (0=none; 10=most highly rank ed) 10.00 1 Percentoftertiarystudentsenrolledinglobally rankeduniversities (0=none; 6=highest enrollment) 4.00 15 UNITED STATES STRENGTH/ WEAKNESS Oveperforming and underperforming are relative to 15 countries of similar GDPper capita: Ireland, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Netherlands, Austria, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Australia, Canada, Belgium, Iceland, Norway, Finland, United Kingdom Overperforming by 1or more pts. Overperforming by less than 1pt. Performing within the expected range Underperforming by less than 1pt. Underperforming by 1or more pts. No data available Strengthsandweaknesses
- 30. Global change in Social Progress 2014-2017 Since 2014, the world aggregate score on the Social Progress Index has improved by 1.66 points 2017: 64.852014: 63.19
- 31. Global Social Progress is Uneven
- 32. SCORE/ VALUE 2017Social ProgressIndex 64.85 SCORE/ VALUE STRENGTH/ WEAKNESS BasicHumanNeeds 73.80 NutritionandBasicMedical Care 89.62 Undernourishment (%of pop.; 5 signifies ≤ 5) 11.27 Depthoffooddefcit (calories/undernourished person; 8 signifies ≤ 8) 74.96 Maternal mortalityrate(deaths/100,000 live births) 141.68 Childmortalityrate(deaths/1,000 live births) 31.82 Deathsfrominfectiousdiseases (deaths/100,000) 139.55 WaterandSanitation 71.26 Accesstopipedwater (%of pop.) 56.67 Rural accesstoimprovedwater source (%of pop.) 86.49 Accesstoimprovedsanitationfacilities (%of pop.) 66.99 Shelter 69.72 Availabilityofaf ordablehousing(%satisfied) 0.55 Accesstoelectricity(%of pop.) 84.03 Qualityofelectricitysupply(1=low; 7=high) 4.46 Householdair pollutionattributabledeaths (deaths/100,000) 64.59 Personal Safety 64.61 Homiciderate(deaths/100,000) 5.02 Level ofviolent crime(1=low; 5=high) 2.77 Perceivedcriminality(1=low; 5=high) 3.57 Political terror (1=low; 5=high) 3.43 Traf cdeaths(deaths/100,000) 17.37 SCORE/ VALUE STRENGTH/ WEAKNESS Foundationsof Wellbeing 68.89 AccesstoBasicKnowledge 87.63 Adult literacyrate(%of pop. aged 15+) 84.56 Primaryschool enrollment (%of children) 93.72 Secondaryschool enrollment (%of children) 80.99 Gender parityinsecondaryenrollment (distance from parity) 0.06 AccesstoInformation andCommunications 62.51 Mobiletelephonesubscriptions (subscriptions/100 people) 87.55 Internet users(%of pop.) 43.47 PressFreedomIndex (0=most free; 100=least free) 47.37 HealthandWellness 64.75 Lifeexpectancyat 60 (years) 19.45 Prematuredeathsfromnon-communicable diseases(deaths/100,000) 440.11 Suiciderate(deaths/100,000) 11.48 Environmental Quality 60.67 Outdoor air pollutionattributabledeaths (deaths/100,000) 78.93 Wastewater treatment (%of wastewater) 21.87 Biodiversityandhabitat (0=no protection; 100=high protection) 75.16 Greenhousegasemissions (CO2 equivalents per GDP) 539.22 SCORE/ VALUE STRENGTH/ WEAKNESS Opportunity 51.85 Personal Rights 51.25 Political rights(0=no rights; 40=full rights) 20.95 Freedomofexpression (0=no freedom; 16=full freedom) 9.27 Freedomofassembly (0=no freedom; 1=full freedom) 0.53 Privatepropertyrights(0=none; 100=full) 39.47 Personal FreedomandChoice 63.11 Freedomover lifechoices(%satisfied) 0.75 Freedomofreligion(1=low; 4=high) 2.29 Earlymarriage(%of women aged 15-19) 0.14 Satisfeddemandfor contraception (%of women) 73.65 Corruption(0=high; 100=low) 40.63 ToleranceandInclusion 43.00 Tolerancefor immigrants(0=low; 100=high) 0.51 Tolerancefor homosexuals(0=low; 100=high) 0.26 Discriminationandviolenceagainst minorities(0=low; 10=high) 7.54 Religioustolerance(1=low; 4=high) 2.36 Communitysafetynet (0=low; 100=high) 0.76 AccesstoAdvancedEducation 50.04 Yearsoftertiaryschooling 0.48 Women’saverageyearsinschool 9.12 Inequalityintheattainment ofeducation (0=low; 1=high) 0.25 Number ofgloballyrankeduniversities (0=none; 10=most highly rank ed) 8.00 Percentoftertiarystudentsenrolledinglobally rankeduniversities (0=none; 6=highest enrollment) 3.00 THEWORLD Overperforming by 1or more pts. Overperforming by less than 1pt. Performing within the expected range Underperforming by less than 1pt. Underperforming by 1or more pts. No data available Strengthsand weaknesses Oveperforming and underperforming are relative to 15 countries of similar GDP per capita: Lebanon, Montenegro, Botswana, Thailand, Brazil, Algeria, Serbia, Colombia, South Africa, China, Dominican Republic, Bulgaria, Mexico, Iran, Macedonia
- 33. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita World
- 34. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita World SDGs 2030 target
- 35. According to a 2015 Deloitte report, the world will come nowhere near achieving the SDGs through economic growth alone
- 36. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita World SDGs 2030 target
- 37. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita World SDGs 2030 target Costa Rica
- 38. Social Progress Index vs. GDP per capita World SDGs 2030 target Costa Rica World in 2030?
- 39. Thank you Michael Green CEO, Social Progress Imperative @shepleygreen @socprogress www.socialprogressindex.com
Editor's Notes
- The Social Progress Index relies on four design principles. It uses/is: 1. Exclusively social and environmental indicators: Our aim is to measure social progress directly, rather than utilize economic proxies or outcomes. 2. Outcomes not inputs: Our purpose is to measure the outcomes that matter to the lives of real people, not the inputs. For example, we want to measure a country’s health and wellness achieved, not how much effort is expended nor how much the country spends on healthcare. 3. Holistic and relevant to all countries: We strive to create a holistic measure of social progress that encompasses the many aspects of the health of societies. 4. Actionable: The Social Progress Index aims to be a practical tool that will help leaders and practitioners in government, business, and civil society to implement policies and programs that will drive faster social progress.
- Our framework was designed with four key principles in mind: It was designed to be relevant to all countries. Our definition of social progress is based on international agreements like the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights to ensure its broad applicability. It was designed to be actionable. That is, each component of our index represents an area where stakeholders can take concrete action based on what the data shows. It only includes social and environmental factors, which makes it possible to compare the social and economic health of a society side-by-side and delve into the relationship between the two. It only measure outcomes, not inputs, to more accurately capture people’s lived experience.