A presentation on Godrej Consumer Product ltd. (GCPL) which includes FMCG sector analysis, Marketing Analysis , HR duties in GCPL, Company Snapshot, Bloomberg Report for GCPL, financial Ratios, and a lot
A PPT on Godrej Family talking about the inception of the company and it's progress ever since then. This PPT also comprises it's SWOT analysis along with Porter's Five Forces Model
A PPT on Godrej Family talking about the inception of the company and it's progress ever since then. This PPT also comprises it's SWOT analysis along with Porter's Five Forces Model
Final project on Britannia company and competitor Raman Bang
sector information, sector analysis, company profile, company portfolio, porter five force model, swot analysis, Competitor analysis, Marketing mix, Analysis of net profit,revenue,debt-equity, Finance ratio, Organisation hierarchy,, Job description Job analysis, marketing product life cycle,
Full report of company on the basis of 3 profile Marketing, finance, Human resource management.
This report contains a complete analysis of FMCG SECTOR which includes history, companies background, financial and working of companies (top 5 companies) under FMCG sector.
I have done my project of Godrej expert of FMCG industry. its gives lots of knowledge during the making my project and understand the industry or profile.
Final project on Britannia company and competitor Raman Bang
sector information, sector analysis, company profile, company portfolio, porter five force model, swot analysis, Competitor analysis, Marketing mix, Analysis of net profit,revenue,debt-equity, Finance ratio, Organisation hierarchy,, Job description Job analysis, marketing product life cycle,
Full report of company on the basis of 3 profile Marketing, finance, Human resource management.
This report contains a complete analysis of FMCG SECTOR which includes history, companies background, financial and working of companies (top 5 companies) under FMCG sector.
I have done my project of Godrej expert of FMCG industry. its gives lots of knowledge during the making my project and understand the industry or profile.
Techniques to optimize the pagerank algorithm usually fall in two categories. One is to try reducing the work per iteration, and the other is to try reducing the number of iterations. These goals are often at odds with one another. Skipping computation on vertices which have already converged has the potential to save iteration time. Skipping in-identical vertices, with the same in-links, helps reduce duplicate computations and thus could help reduce iteration time. Road networks often have chains which can be short-circuited before pagerank computation to improve performance. Final ranks of chain nodes can be easily calculated. This could reduce both the iteration time, and the number of iterations. If a graph has no dangling nodes, pagerank of each strongly connected component can be computed in topological order. This could help reduce the iteration time, no. of iterations, and also enable multi-iteration concurrency in pagerank computation. The combination of all of the above methods is the STICD algorithm. [sticd] For dynamic graphs, unchanged components whose ranks are unaffected can be skipped altogether.
Analysis insight about a Flyball dog competition team's performanceroli9797
Insight of my analysis about a Flyball dog competition team's last year performance. Find more: https://github.com/rolandnagy-ds/flyball_race_analysis/tree/main
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
Graph algorithms, like PageRank Compressed Sparse Row (CSR) is an adjacency-list based graph representation that is
Multiply with different modes (map)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector multiply.
2. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector multiply.
Sum with different storage types (reduce)
1. Performance of vector element sum using float vs bfloat16 as the storage type.
Sum with different modes (reduce)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector element sum.
2. Performance of memcpy vs in-place based CUDA based vector element sum.
3. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (memcpy).
4. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Sum with in-place strategies of CUDA mode (reduce)
1. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Adjusting OpenMP PageRank : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
For massive graphs that fit in RAM, but not in GPU memory, it is possible to take
advantage of a shared memory system with multiple CPUs, each with multiple cores, to
accelerate pagerank computation. If the NUMA architecture of the system is properly taken
into account with good vertex partitioning, the speedup can be significant. To take steps in
this direction, experiments are conducted to implement pagerank in OpenMP using two
different approaches, uniform and hybrid. The uniform approach runs all primitives required
for pagerank in OpenMP mode (with multiple threads). On the other hand, the hybrid
approach runs certain primitives in sequential mode (i.e., sumAt, multiply).
2. FMCG Sector Analysis
FMCG sector is the 4th largest sector in the India
The Retail market in India is estimated to reach US$ 1.1 trillion by 2020 from US$
672 billion in 2016, with modern trade expected to grow at 20 per cent - 25 per
cent per annum
The government has allowed 100 % Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in food
processing and single-brand retail and 51 % in multi-brand retail
Rural consumption has increased because of increasing incomes
The growth of FMCG sector is also because of population size in India
The current population of India is 1.34 Billion
According to expert researcher of FMCG market the market will increase to
4,00,000 crores by 2020
3. Growth Patterns of FMCG
Sector
2420
3020
3480
3680
4490
4610
4730
4900
1090.3
1345.7
1461.6 1446.9 1452.1
1573.1 1613.1 1709.3
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
FMCG Sector *in million GDP Per Capita * in USD
The growth of FMCG is directly
related with Per Capita of
country and in India there are
continuous growth recorded.
In the give chart in the year
2011 to 2012, as there is fall in
GDP per capita and comparing
with FMCG sector there is slow
growth recorded too.
After the year there is growth
stability recorded till date and is
expected to grow at faster rate
then of now.
4. Porter’s Five Force Analysis
Porter
Five
Force
Model
Threats of
New Entry
Threats of
Substitution
Buyer
Power
Supplier
Power
Competitive rivalry ;
• rivalry is high
• Price Competition
• Exit barriers are low
• Advertisement cost is high
Threats of New Entry ;
• FDI
• Licensing and regulation
• Threats of new entry - Moderate
Buyer Power ;
• Bargaining power– High
Supplier Power ;
• Low switching cost induces the
customers’ product shift
• Influence of marketing strategies
• Availability of same or similar
alternatives
• Supplier Power - Low
Threats of substitution ;
• Presence of multiple brands
• Narrow product differentiation under many
brands
• Price war
• Threats of Substitution - High
Competitive
Rivalry
6. Company Snapshot
The Godrej Group was founded in the year 1897
Ardeshir Godrej and Pirojsha Burjorji Godrej was founder of the Godrej
Group
Godrej makes its first Indian Safe
Godrej then became a brand and a matter of trust in lock industry
Godrej was also called upon to provide safes for the Queen of England
when she visited India in 1905
In 1947 after independence, the government of India gave tender to
make 15,000 ballot for voting with internal lock system
Today, Godrej Security Solutions caters not only to domestic clients but
also exports to 45 countries
Ardeshir Godrej
Pirojsha Burjorji
7. Competition of Godrej Consumer
Product Limited
HUL
Black Rose
L'Oréal
Gillette
Palmolive
Old Spice
Procter and Gamble
ITC Limited
8. Market Growth as compare to Competitors
Bloomberg Report 2010-2017
9. SWOT ANALYSIS OF GCPL
Strengths
Leader among India’s FMCG companies
Some brands in 100 most trusted brands
Presence in more than 80 countries
Over 1,300 full-time employees
Widespread distribution network across India
Recognized Godrej Research & Development
Centre
Weaknesses
Market share is limited due to presence of other strong
FMCG brands
Godrej products has stiff competition from big
domestic players and international brand
Opportunities
Tap rural markets and increase penetration in
urban area
Mergers and acquisitions to strengthen the brand
Increasing purchasing power of people thereby
increasing demand
Threats
Intense and increasing competition amongst other
FMCG companies
FDI in retail thereby allowing international brands
Competition from unbranded and local products
10. PRODUCT PROFILE
Godrej Consumer Product Ltd. Produces 30 different types of FMCG products
Godrej Good Night Godrej Expert Godrej Darling Godrej Cinthol Godrej No.1
Godrej B Blunt Godrej Protekt Godrej aer Godrej Frika Godrej Hit
Godrej Issue Godrej HIT Godrej Nupur Godrej Ilicit Color Godrej Cuticura
Godrej Ezee Godrej INTECTO Godrej Stella Godrej mitu
Godrej Soft and
Gentle
Godrej
Pamelagrant
Godrej Touch of
Silver
Godrej 919 Godrej Renew Godrej Tura
Godrej Villeneuve Godrej Roby Godrej Renew
Godrej Liquid
Blonde
Godrej Good
Night
11. Godrej Hit
Around 47% of the total revenue of GCPL comes from Home
Insecticide business
The penetration of Home Insecticides products is at very low level
of 28% to 30% in rural India
Approximately 82% of the total Indian population lives in malaria
transmission risk area
Hit has been on a crusade against the threat of diseases like
malaria, dengue, jaundice and diarrhea since its inception in 1991
Aim of Godrej is to offer a superior, effective solution
12. SWOT Analysis
Strengths
Reaching out to a strong consumer base through a
Strong distribution network
Wide range of products in forms of aerosols, chalks
and baits
Most powerful mosquito solution, acts fastest with
visible drop dead action
Weaknesses
Limited presence in rural areas, which can be a
huge market
Rural market shifting slowly on chemical pest
control and there some of technique is still
traditional
Pesticides Poisoning
Opportunities
Expansion in Indian as well as global markets
Targeting the region according to climate
Taking governmental opportunities
Threats
Rising competition in local markets and pest
management firms
Popularity of other brands in the same segment
High customer brand switching for the FMCG
brands
13. Marketing Mix
Product
Targeting the soft corner of society which is
Housemakers
Godrej entered the Pest control market on right
time in the year 1991, time when new diseases
because of Insects started to affect the health of
Individual
Marketing strategy of the product was good
Price
The pricing strategy of godrej is made in such a way,
which is in reach of all income group, the lowest price
is INR 12 of HIT Pre Mixed Cubes-Kills Rat, and the
highest is INR 240 of HIT Plastic Crawling Insect Killer
Spray (CIK) (Lal) and HIT Spray Flying Insect Killer
(FIK) (Kala) (Lime Fragrance) and both is available in
625 ml.
Place
Godrej Industries has got a presence across India
Godrej has a vast distribution and retail network,
be it urban or rural
Godrej products are primarily sold via retailers
Promotion
Godrej has roped onto famous personalities and
Bollywood stars to play the role of their brand
ambassador
Godrej is involved in various Corporate Social
Responsibility projects, which gives them build trust
among consumer and government enterprises
14. STP Study
SEGMENT
People who want
complete protection from pest.
TARGET GROUP
Availability of product in
all size and price range makes the
product available to Lower, middle and
upper class people.
POSITIONING
Image of Powerful and
efficacious pest solution that kills pests
instantly.
PLC of Product
We can consider Godrej Hit in
Maturity stage as the brand has
already created its positive image in
consumer’s mind and godrej users
will not shift to any other product
15. Gross profit margin during
2017 – 20%
2016 – 17%
2015 – 16%
Net Profit Margin during
2017 - 16%
2016 - 14%
2015 - 14%
Working Capital Analysis
Current Assets Current Liabilities Working capital
Mar-17 1590.84 1527.96 62.88
Mar-16 1215.97 1200.25 15.72
Mar-15 1358.78 1529.91 -171.13
Debt Equity Ratio Analysis
Debt Equity Debt Equity Ratio
Mar-17 0 4397.93 0
Mar-16 0 3823.25 0
Mar-15 0 3383.05 0
16. Work Culture
The work culture in Godrej supports learning at every stage of one's
work life. Opportunities in learning are available in the technical,
functional, behavioral, general management and leadership
Respect and recognition of performance is an inextricable part of
our work culture
RECRUITMENT SOURCE OF THE COMPANY
There are two type of recruitments
Internal Recruitment
External Recruitment
Internal Sources
Promotion and demotion
Recalls
Pipe line candidates
Boomerang
Recalls
External Sources
Advertisements
Placement agencies
Walk in interviews
Outsourcing
Employee referral’s