Given technology today, would it be more feasible than in the past for the United States to become more of a direct democracy than a republic? What would be the benefits? The drawbacks? What did we learn from Athenian democracy, the Enlightenment, and our founders that would argue against making democracy more direct? Given technology today, would it be more feasible than in the past for the United States to become more of a direct democracy than a republic? What would be the benefits? The drawbacks? What did we learn from Athenian democracy, the Enlightenment, and our founders that would argue against making democracy more direct? Given technology today, would it be more feasible than in the past for the United States to become more of a direct democracy than a republic? What would be the benefits? The drawbacks? What did we learn from Athenian democracy, the Enlightenment, and our founders that would argue against making democracy more direct? Solution US is not a democracy and it is a republic is a false polarity. It is a political arrangement in which power and control lies in the delegates. In the Government by the general population, democracy is practiced through the chosen agents. If we talk about an Direct democracy, laws and choices are made by a government which has larger majority. The legislature might be monarchical, aristocratically, or, democratical. America has a constitutional democracy. Courts can control the just will. The US Government is the Constitutional Federal delegate democracy. One can request a move towards a Direct democracy, yet it can make representing troublesome if there should be an occurrence of a coalition. Likewise, passing laws is troublesome if there should arise an occurrence of a govern of a substantial number of little parties. Basic natural rights, social agreements are credited to Enlightment. In the fourth century, Athens can be deciphered as a social contract. In a Direct democracy, general people pick options that boost a person\'s welfare. An arrangement of techniques are picked, and, a political structure changes based on these systems. Popular governments attempt to search for an optimal rate of progress. Neoclassical theory is the benchmark for an optimal rate of political change. Athens was a advanced arrangement of direct democracy. General people could present proposition before the leadership body. The Athenian direct democracy accomplished a harmony amongst instability, and, solidness. The model of decision in a Direct democracy demonstrates the likelihood of Pareto improvement arrangements when compensatory installments are permitted.