The Hypothesis
"There's No Gravity Found By The Sun"
This paper provides 5 proves for this hypothesis which are:
1- Planet Orbital Distance disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
2- The Sun Gravity Value disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
3- The Planet Velocity disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
4- The moon orbit analysis proves the solar group current description is incorrect.
5- The Solar Group is One Machine consists of all solar planets.
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (III)Gerges francis
The Giant-impact hypothesis suggests that, The Earth Moon is formed from the ejects of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planet…etc
I suggest the following theory:
- Mars itself had collided The Earth and not another planet. how that is happened?
- Mars original orbital distance =84 mkm, and Mars had to move from it to its new orbital distance =227.9 mkm – i.e. - Mars had to move from 84 mk to 227.9 mk.
- Through Mars motion – Mars had collided Venus (at first) and Earth (at Second)
- Mars had moved pushing by a strong force from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and that caused the collisions debris (and ejects) to move with Mars in the same motion –
- Venus has no Moon –because the debris had to move with Mars in the same motion, But because Earth Mass is greater than Venus & Mars and because the debris lost their high motion momentum, Earth could controlled some of these debris and created its moon by them – the rest debris still moved with Mars
- Mars could attract its 2 small moons from these debris
How to prove this story? By 3 following questions:
(1st question) Was Mars Original Orbital Distance = 84 mkm really? how to prove?
(2nd question) Is Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) an unique motion?
(3rd question) What are the results which prove this motion occurrence?
These questions will be discussed– but let's summarize the (3rd question) Answer:
Mars Immigration Results:
1- Mars Diameter Decreasing
2- The Asteroid Belt Creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)Gerges francis
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion
(As A Train Motion)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Move In One General Motion (As A Train Motion)
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Solar Group Is Similar to One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Building (or solar group is similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it)
- Planets Motions is done As One Unified Motion
- As a train moves with all its carriages – similar to that – solar group moves one unified motion with all planets together
- Although Planets Velocities Are Different from each other – that – can't disprove this theory –because – as in any machine of gears – the different velocities of gears consist together the machine one general motion
This paper tries to prove this fact
During 2013-2019 – I have studied the solar group geometry and discovered the following 5 Equations:
1- Planet Gravity Equation (Point 2-1)
2- Planet Orbital Distance Equation (Point 2-2)
3- Planet Diameter Equation (Point 2-3)
4- The Sun Rays Production Equation (Point 2-4)
5- Venus Diameter Equation (Point 2-5)
6- An Argument against The Big Bang Theory (Point 2-6)
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramidGerges francis
I claim that
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid Form
Where the sun is in the Pyramid Head
And the solar outer planets form the Pyramid Base….
This paper tries to prove this fact..
The Argument (No. 10)
The Planets move one unified motion, as the train moves with its carriages, So, the solar system moves with its planets together one unified motion.
This Argument can be concluded from the 1st Argument "Lorentz Transformations proves "Particle Data Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion"
So
If Particle data is a function of its motion , that proves the claim, "the planets move together one unified motion"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Group Is A Pyramid
Abstract
Let's explain this idea in following:
- The sun is found on the Pyramid Apex
- Each Planet is found on different level which makes the solar group as a ladder
- The planets (Mercury - Saturn - Neptune – Pluto) form the Pyramid Base
- The players (The sun – Earth – Moon – Mars) form the pyramid Height (The Pyramid Main Column)
- The rest planets form the Pyramid walls
- The pyramid is consisted by the planets motions
i.e.
- The Pyramid Is The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory…
- The Pyramid Base and Height consist from different planets levels on the ladder…
Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports "Mars Immigration Theory" (III)Gerges francis
The Giant-impact hypothesis suggests that, The Earth Moon is formed from the ejects of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planet…etc
I suggest the following theory:
- Mars itself had collided The Earth and not another planet. how that is happened?
- Mars original orbital distance =84 mkm, and Mars had to move from it to its new orbital distance =227.9 mkm – i.e. - Mars had to move from 84 mk to 227.9 mk.
- Through Mars motion – Mars had collided Venus (at first) and Earth (at Second)
- Mars had moved pushing by a strong force from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and that caused the collisions debris (and ejects) to move with Mars in the same motion –
- Venus has no Moon –because the debris had to move with Mars in the same motion, But because Earth Mass is greater than Venus & Mars and because the debris lost their high motion momentum, Earth could controlled some of these debris and created its moon by them – the rest debris still moved with Mars
- Mars could attract its 2 small moons from these debris
How to prove this story? By 3 following questions:
(1st question) Was Mars Original Orbital Distance = 84 mkm really? how to prove?
(2nd question) Is Mars Motion from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) an unique motion?
(3rd question) What are the results which prove this motion occurrence?
These questions will be discussed– but let's summarize the (3rd question) Answer:
Mars Immigration Results:
1- Mars Diameter Decreasing
2- The Asteroid Belt Creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1. The Main Hypothesis: The Matter Is Created From The Light
2. The produced matter is created in motion, that means the solar planets are created in motions (regardless the motion reason)
3. The solar group are a group of motions conveyors, So the motions of all solar planets are depended on each other
4. The solar group motions aim to create a difference in motion velocity = C between 2 points in the group.
5. i.e. The Solar Planets work as gears or conveyors group, transfer the motion from point to another point, aiming to create a difference in motion velocity = C velocity. And that's happening where the solar group motions create a difference in velocities between the Earth and Sun motions = C velocity (for that reason the sun is our source of light)
6. The solar group is A Dipole System has 2 heads (the sun and the Earth)
7. The light Production by the planets motions (i.e. by transferring of the mechanical waves into light waves), the original source of light beams energy, from which the solar planets were created, will be conserved.
8. Because there's a difference in velocity = C between 2 points in the solar group (the sun and the Earth), we may conclude easily that, there's more than one frame in the solar group.
9. To create a difference of velocity = C, all solar planets should revolve around the dipole line (The Sun-Earth Line) in the same direction, enabling the velocities addition process to gather all motions in the same point…
10. The Produced Solar Planets should have relationships between their Geometrical structures (if they were created from the light), so the planets are not created independent but related to each other geometrically.
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion (As A Train Motion)Gerges francis
Solar Planets Move Together In One Unified Motion
(As A Train Motion)
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planets Move In One General Motion (As A Train Motion)
The Hypothesis Explanation
- Solar Group Is Similar to One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Building (or solar group is similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it)
- Planets Motions is done As One Unified Motion
- As a train moves with all its carriages – similar to that – solar group moves one unified motion with all planets together
- Although Planets Velocities Are Different from each other – that – can't disprove this theory –because – as in any machine of gears – the different velocities of gears consist together the machine one general motion
This paper tries to prove this fact
During 2013-2019 – I have studied the solar group geometry and discovered the following 5 Equations:
1- Planet Gravity Equation (Point 2-1)
2- Planet Orbital Distance Equation (Point 2-2)
3- Planet Diameter Equation (Point 2-3)
4- The Sun Rays Production Equation (Point 2-4)
5- Venus Diameter Equation (Point 2-5)
6- An Argument against The Big Bang Theory (Point 2-6)
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramidGerges francis
I claim that
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid Form
Where the sun is in the Pyramid Head
And the solar outer planets form the Pyramid Base….
This paper tries to prove this fact..
The Argument (No. 10)
The Planets move one unified motion, as the train moves with its carriages, So, the solar system moves with its planets together one unified motion.
This Argument can be concluded from the 1st Argument "Lorentz Transformations proves "Particle Data Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion"
So
If Particle data is a function of its motion , that proves the claim, "the planets move together one unified motion"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism?
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?
If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?
The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..
The Main Hypothesis:
"The Matter Is Made Of Light"
The solar group geometrical structure is a pyramid (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Group Is A Pyramid
Abstract
Let's explain this idea in following:
- The sun is found on the Pyramid Apex
- Each Planet is found on different level which makes the solar group as a ladder
- The planets (Mercury - Saturn - Neptune – Pluto) form the Pyramid Base
- The players (The sun – Earth – Moon – Mars) form the pyramid Height (The Pyramid Main Column)
- The rest planets form the Pyramid walls
- The pyramid is consisted by the planets motions
i.e.
- The Pyramid Is The Solar Planets Motions Trajectory…
- The Pyramid Base and Height consist from different planets levels on the ladder…
Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason)Gerges francis
Metonic Cycle is Energy sent from Uranus to the moon
Pluto also effects on Metonic Cycle and that explains his data convenience with Earth and Moon Data
Mass Is Distributed Through Solar System
Paper Hypothesis
1- Planet Mass Is Not A Planet Property But Distributed Based On Solar System Geometrical Rules
2- Mass Distribution Proves That Solar Group Is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building- And The Energy Is Transported Through The Solar Group To Create The Planet Matter And Orbital Distance.
3- Saturn Is Solar System Central Point (i.e. Saturn Is Solar System Motor)
4- Mass Distribution aims To create Different Rates Of Time Between The Solar Planets Motions.
The sun data shows relativistic effects and motions Gerges francis
Abstract
- The Sun Data shows Relativistic Effects.
i.e.
- There's a physical point in the solar group moves with c velocity relative to another physical point in the solar group. and this high velocity causes the relativistic effects which are observed and recorded in this paper
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis shows that, Mars Original Orbital Distance was = 84 million km. but because of the relativistic effects, Mars had to immigrate from his original point to his new point at orbital distance = 227.9 million km.
- This paper provide analyzed data and explanations to prove these 2 facts which are:
1. There's motion with c velocity inside the solar group
2. Mars immigrated from his original point at orbital distance 84 million km to his new orbital distance 227.9 million km
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)Gerges francis
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
A light beam with velocity (1.16 mkm per sec), creates the solar system Gerges francis
Abstract
-There are 2 light velocities in the solar system (1.16 mkm/sec & 0.3 mkm/sec)
-Because of the high velocity motions, time & distance values are equivalent
Example No. I
Let's see how the solar system is created in following:
- Mercury is created by a period of time =50 seconds
-Light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec travels for 50 seconds a distance =58 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance (=360 mkm Mercury orbital circumference)
-360 mkm -because of high velocity motion – is used as 360 seconds
-Light beam with velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) during 360 seconds travels a distance = =108 mkm = Venus Orbital Distance
-216.4 mkm (Venus Orbital Diameter) is a distance passed by light beam its velocity 0.3 mkm/sec during a period =720 seconds
-720 seconds is used as a distance =720 mkm = Mercury Jupiter distance –
-Mercury Jupiter diameter (720 mkm x 2) needs a period = 720 seconds x 2 which needs a distance = 216.4 x 2 mkm
-(the distance 216.4 mkm x 2) is used as a time period in the following equation: 216.4x 2 x 1.16 mkm/s= 500 mkm (500 mkm is used as a time period= 500s)
-Light beam ( 0.3 mkm/sec) needs 500 s to pass Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm)
-Still the distance 720 mkm is produced by a light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) during a period = 627 seconds (Example No. I is discussed deeply in this paper)
Conclusion
(1st) There's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(2nd) The solar system is created depending on light motions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Group is One Machine
This one machine cooperates together to enable the Earth to produce The Solar Day Time
Providing the life chance on the Earth..
This paper aims to prove this idea and explains this machine mechanism.
The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure Proves The Following Conclusions:
Primary Conclusions
(1) Solar Group Can't be created neither by Big Bang Theory Nor Sun Gravity Concept.
(2) The Solar Group is created of Only One Energy travels through the group
(3) This one Energy creates planets matters (E=mc2 supports that) and planets orbital distances (because Space = Energy –my hypothesis)
(4) Solar Group can be similar to one train and each planet is a carriage of it.
(5) Solar Group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it
(6) Solar Group can be similar to one building and each planet is a part of it
(7) So, when a planet moves – means - this planet moves as a carriage in one train –all solar planets move together in one general motion
Paper Basic Conclusion:
Energy must be Transported from Jupiter to Earth Moon Orbit
The paper tries to prove this fact
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History (Part II) Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis…
Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm and Mars has immigrated from it to dwell in the new point with Orbital Distance = 227.9 mkm
i.e.
Mars Was The Next Direct Planet After Mercury – where Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm and Mars orbital distance was 84 mkm
How to prove that?
Mars Daily Motion Data shows a great effect of Mercury on Mars Motion – which can't be explained unless by A Direct Effect Of The Neighbor Planet
How such effect can be found with a great distance?!
Mercury effected on Mars Creation and Motion Data when Mars was its neighbor with orbital distance =84 mkm – So When Mars has immigrated – the planet geometrical structure reserved this effect in its data – accordingly – Mars Motion Data shows clearly Mercury Effect on Mars Motion - which proves that Mars was the direct next neighbor of Mercury
Paper Question
Why Mars motion daily degrees (0.524 deg) = (1/ Mars orbital inclination 1.9 deg.)?
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Mars Immigration Theory Summary:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm but Mars was immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from the point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then collided also with Earth (at second)
- From these collisions debris Earth Moon was created and Mars created its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter and created the asteroid belt
Based on that
- Mars was the planet which collided with Earth and Not Theia (Theia impact) as the Giant-Impact Hypothesis suggests
The theory answers many questions to improve the Giant –impact hypothesis:
(1st Question) Why Venus has no moon spite it had a similar collision?
Because Mars was moving from the point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) – So Mars pushed all debris to move with it in the same motion direction – Mars had created a wave to push all debris far from Venues toward Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)- for that reason Venus Couldn't Create A Moon – but Earth has A Greater Mass and the Debris Lost Their Motion High Momentum at Earth – so Earth could created its moon from these debris
(2nd Question) The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?!
The Origin Of This Ocean Is Venus and by that – the mystery is solved easily – the moon rocks are consisted of 3 planets rocks which are Venus – Earth - Mars – and because of that the 3 planets rocks are seen among the moon rocks.
(3rd Question) why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?
The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%) because the moon is created by all of them.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels from Pluto to Earth Axis which creates the connection between Pluto on one side and Earth with her Moon on the other Side
Based on this connection Pluto and the Moon orbit effect on Solar Planets Creation Process
This hypothesis depends on
Solar System General Principle
-Solar group geometrical structure depends on energy of light beam motion (its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec) for one second period
-Light motion (1.16 mkm/sec) for 1 second period causes Planet to move for 1 solar day..
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Saturn Effect On The Solar Group Geometry
Saturn shows Clearly The Solar Group Geometrical Structure.
The Basic Hypothesis:
The Solar Group Is One Trajectory Of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Trajectory…
i.e.
The Solar Planets (matter is energy because E=mc2) and their orbital distances (Space is Energy – hypothesis)both are created from the same energy which makes
The solar group as one body and each planet is a member of this same body.
Or
The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the solar group is created depending on the cooperation and integration between the solar planets.
Saturn Effect
Saturn tells how the solar group is created based on the previous vision
i.e.
Saturn tells us which planet is created first and which second and what geometrical rule control this creation process.
Shortly
The solar group is one family, all planets are relatives to each other – but Saturn tells us who's brother to whom and who's uncle, who's parent and who's nephew
Saturn Data tells this fact clearly as the sun …Saturn Is The Solar Group Secret
The first question in this research was why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? i.e. why (the Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) = (earth orbital distance/ Earth Moon distance)?
The answer was "That's only Pure Coincidence" (No.1)
Then I found another question…
The Earth-Moon Orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) = 2.58 mkm = Earth daily motion… why?
"That's also Pure Coincidence" (No.2)
Then I found the moon orbit geometrical relationships which are:
6. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total (error 1%)
7. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
8. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
9. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius (377000km)
Why the previous relationships are found?
"Surely these are Pure Coincidence" (No.3)
Let's then with more depth, the moon has to move daily a distance = Earth daily motion, otherwise they will be separated from each other.. that means the moon should move daily =2.58 mkm, but we know that the moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) also 2.58mkm ..why?
"We all know this is Pure Coincidence" (No.4)
Then Metonic Cycle question is produced
Why the moon orbit regresses daily 19 degrees? Why the moon rotates Metonic Cycle which Earth doesn't? let's think with some deep vision
Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days
6939.75 days = 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years)
= 235 x 29.53 days (Synodic Month)
= 20 x 346.6 days (nodal year)
The previous data tells us that, the Earth motion is in harmony with Moon and Moon orbit motions, that's why the three motions finish their cycles in the same time \
Why?
"Just Pure Coincidence" (No.5)
I found we need to find some logical and physical explanation behind all these data, I can't accept any of these as Pure coincidences…
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Orbital Distance Proves, We See Wrongly The Solar Group,Gerges francis
This paper tries to prove the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis No. (1)
- Jupiter Is The Solar Group Central Point
- Jupiter Orbital Distance contradicts the solar group current description
Hypothesis No. (2)
- Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Can't Be An Ellipse
- Earth Moon motion effects on our vision and force us to see Planet Motion Trajectory as an ellipse (which is a wrong vision)
Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory" Gerges francis
THE GIANT-IMPACT HYPOTHESIS suggests that Luna (the Moon) formed from the ejecta of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar System coalesced).[1] The colliding body is sometimes called Theia, from the name of the mythical Greek Titan who was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon.[2] Analysis of lunar rocks, published in a 2016 report, suggests that the impact may have been a direct hit, causing a thorough mixing of both parent bodies.[3]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis)
The Giant- impact hypothesis supports my theory of "Mars Immigration"
Shortly
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm, and because of an earthquake in the solar system Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm
And during this motion
- Mars had collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End
- Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth -instead – Mars collisions caused some debris to be thrown only
- The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great force that means all Mars collisions occurred during this motion caused its debris to be thrown In The Same Motion Direction and because of that the debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Day needs 84 = 5040 seconds minutes to be 176 days
This Data analysis supports my claim that
"The Matter and Distance are created together by the Same Energy"
i.e.
The Matter is Energy
The Distance is Energy
The Space (distance) is a complementary to the Matter,
Means the matter can't be created without Space
Imagine a classroom
The classroom is NOT a space will be filled with desks..
It's mistaken
Each desk is brought inside the classroom, brought with it a part of the classroom floor
Now, the classroom floor is created with the desks and NOT without..
That's the concept I want to suggest
The matter and distance are complementary to each other … no one of both can found alone
This idea can easily be concluded from Matter Theory of Creation
Where the Theory supposes that the Matter is bright fringes and the distance is dark fringes
We can see that the matter is created as a rate to its complementary distance..
This meaning we concluded easily from the Equation
Planet orbital distance = Planet diameter * 1092
Note Please: 84 minutes = 5040 seconds but (71)2 = 5041
Does mars fit his position is the solar group why notGerges francis
The Claim
Mars Data Doesn't Fit his Position In The Solar Group
Because
Mars had immigrated from his original point with distance 84 million km from the sun and dwell in his new point with distance 227.9 million km from the sun (My Conclusion)
So Mars Data was fit to his original position (with distance 84 mkm)
But
Mars Data doesn't fit his new position (with distance 227.9 mkm)
This paper analyzes Mars Data to prove this Fact.
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theoryGerges francis
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Jupiter uranus distance (metonic cycle reason)Gerges francis
Metonic Cycle is Energy sent from Uranus to the moon
Pluto also effects on Metonic Cycle and that explains his data convenience with Earth and Moon Data
Mass Is Distributed Through Solar System
Paper Hypothesis
1- Planet Mass Is Not A Planet Property But Distributed Based On Solar System Geometrical Rules
2- Mass Distribution Proves That Solar Group Is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building- And The Energy Is Transported Through The Solar Group To Create The Planet Matter And Orbital Distance.
3- Saturn Is Solar System Central Point (i.e. Saturn Is Solar System Motor)
4- Mass Distribution aims To create Different Rates Of Time Between The Solar Planets Motions.
The sun data shows relativistic effects and motions Gerges francis
Abstract
- The Sun Data shows Relativistic Effects.
i.e.
- There's a physical point in the solar group moves with c velocity relative to another physical point in the solar group. and this high velocity causes the relativistic effects which are observed and recorded in this paper
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis shows that, Mars Original Orbital Distance was = 84 million km. but because of the relativistic effects, Mars had to immigrate from his original point to his new point at orbital distance = 227.9 million km.
- This paper provide analyzed data and explanations to prove these 2 facts which are:
1. There's motion with c velocity inside the solar group
2. Mars immigrated from his original point at orbital distance 84 million km to his new orbital distance 227.9 million km
Planet orbital eccentricity disproves the solar group current descriptionGerges francis
The basic challenge in the solar group study is the current description which contradicts with the solar planets data ….
Simply the solar group current description is unreal…! The planet doesn’t move by gravity, and no big bang is found in the universe origin..! Solar Planet motion can't be independent from other planets motions, on the contrary the planets motions work as gears motions, each planet causes the other planet to move!
In fact it's hard to examine this situation… the solar group current description is created based on the direct observation, regardless any planet data… which creates approximately a pure imaginary description…
This imaginary description is created also because of the basic definitions absence…(No definitions for …. distance, time, Energy, Force, Matter, Gravity, Light Nature, Field etc..). to see much we need to examine the eclipse phenomena
Example For Explanation – Total Solar Eclipse
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? i.e. Why we see the sun disc= the moon disc?
The answer is known.. because
(Sun Diameter / Moon Diameter) = (Earth Orbital Distance / Earth Moon Distance)
Why? …..Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Is there a relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance? Or
Planet orbital distance is defined by gravity …?! Let's try to answer
1st Critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
And/
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see it
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
But/
Uranus Diameter is Greater Than Neptune Diameter,
Where Neptune Mass is Greater Than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept!
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)Gerges francis
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
A light beam with velocity (1.16 mkm per sec), creates the solar system Gerges francis
Abstract
-There are 2 light velocities in the solar system (1.16 mkm/sec & 0.3 mkm/sec)
-Because of the high velocity motions, time & distance values are equivalent
Example No. I
Let's see how the solar system is created in following:
- Mercury is created by a period of time =50 seconds
-Light beam with velocity =1.16 mkm/sec travels for 50 seconds a distance =58 mkm = Mercury Orbital Distance (=360 mkm Mercury orbital circumference)
-360 mkm -because of high velocity motion – is used as 360 seconds
-Light beam with velocity (0.3 mkm/sec) during 360 seconds travels a distance = =108 mkm = Venus Orbital Distance
-216.4 mkm (Venus Orbital Diameter) is a distance passed by light beam its velocity 0.3 mkm/sec during a period =720 seconds
-720 seconds is used as a distance =720 mkm = Mercury Jupiter distance –
-Mercury Jupiter diameter (720 mkm x 2) needs a period = 720 seconds x 2 which needs a distance = 216.4 x 2 mkm
-(the distance 216.4 mkm x 2) is used as a time period in the following equation: 216.4x 2 x 1.16 mkm/s= 500 mkm (500 mkm is used as a time period= 500s)
-Light beam ( 0.3 mkm/sec) needs 500 s to pass Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm)
-Still the distance 720 mkm is produced by a light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) during a period = 627 seconds (Example No. I is discussed deeply in this paper)
Conclusion
(1st) There's a light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
(2nd) The solar system is created depending on light motions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Group is One Machine
This one machine cooperates together to enable the Earth to produce The Solar Day Time
Providing the life chance on the Earth..
This paper aims to prove this idea and explains this machine mechanism.
The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure Proves The Following Conclusions:
Primary Conclusions
(1) Solar Group Can't be created neither by Big Bang Theory Nor Sun Gravity Concept.
(2) The Solar Group is created of Only One Energy travels through the group
(3) This one Energy creates planets matters (E=mc2 supports that) and planets orbital distances (because Space = Energy –my hypothesis)
(4) Solar Group can be similar to one train and each planet is a carriage of it.
(5) Solar Group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it
(6) Solar Group can be similar to one building and each planet is a part of it
(7) So, when a planet moves – means - this planet moves as a carriage in one train –all solar planets move together in one general motion
Paper Basic Conclusion:
Energy must be Transported from Jupiter to Earth Moon Orbit
The paper tries to prove this fact
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History (Part II) Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis…
Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm and Mars has immigrated from it to dwell in the new point with Orbital Distance = 227.9 mkm
i.e.
Mars Was The Next Direct Planet After Mercury – where Mercury orbital distance =57.9 mkm and Mars orbital distance was 84 mkm
How to prove that?
Mars Daily Motion Data shows a great effect of Mercury on Mars Motion – which can't be explained unless by A Direct Effect Of The Neighbor Planet
How such effect can be found with a great distance?!
Mercury effected on Mars Creation and Motion Data when Mars was its neighbor with orbital distance =84 mkm – So When Mars has immigrated – the planet geometrical structure reserved this effect in its data – accordingly – Mars Motion Data shows clearly Mercury Effect on Mars Motion - which proves that Mars was the direct next neighbor of Mercury
Paper Question
Why Mars motion daily degrees (0.524 deg) = (1/ Mars orbital inclination 1.9 deg.)?
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars Immigration Theory
Mars Immigration Theory Summary:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm but Mars was immigrated from it to its current orbital distance 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from the point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars had collided with Venus (at first) and then collided also with Earth (at second)
- From these collisions debris Earth Moon was created and Mars created its moons and the rest debris were attracted by Jupiter and created the asteroid belt
Based on that
- Mars was the planet which collided with Earth and Not Theia (Theia impact) as the Giant-Impact Hypothesis suggests
The theory answers many questions to improve the Giant –impact hypothesis:
(1st Question) Why Venus has no moon spite it had a similar collision?
Because Mars was moving from the point (84 mkm) to the point (227.9 mkm) – So Mars pushed all debris to move with it in the same motion direction – Mars had created a wave to push all debris far from Venues toward Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)- for that reason Venus Couldn't Create A Moon – but Earth has A Greater Mass and the Debris Lost Their Motion High Momentum at Earth – so Earth could created its moon from these debris
(2nd Question) The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?!
The Origin Of This Ocean Is Venus and by that – the mystery is solved easily – the moon rocks are consisted of 3 planets rocks which are Venus – Earth - Mars – and because of that the 3 planets rocks are seen among the moon rocks.
(3rd Question) why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)?
The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%) because the moon is created by all of them.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels from Pluto to Earth Axis which creates the connection between Pluto on one side and Earth with her Moon on the other Side
Based on this connection Pluto and the Moon orbit effect on Solar Planets Creation Process
This hypothesis depends on
Solar System General Principle
-Solar group geometrical structure depends on energy of light beam motion (its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec) for one second period
-Light motion (1.16 mkm/sec) for 1 second period causes Planet to move for 1 solar day..
Solar planet motion trajectory is a square (proves)Gerges francis
Abstract
The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover The Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory (Which Is A Square) And To Show The Imaginary One (An Ellipse)
i.e.
The Solar Planet Real Trajectory Is A Square But The Moon Orbit Uses Earth Circumference To Cover This Real Trajectory And Shows The Imaginary One Which Is The An Ellipse…
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Saturn Effect On The Solar Group Geometry
Saturn shows Clearly The Solar Group Geometrical Structure.
The Basic Hypothesis:
The Solar Group Is One Trajectory Of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Trajectory…
i.e.
The Solar Planets (matter is energy because E=mc2) and their orbital distances (Space is Energy – hypothesis)both are created from the same energy which makes
The solar group as one body and each planet is a member of this same body.
Or
The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the solar group is created depending on the cooperation and integration between the solar planets.
Saturn Effect
Saturn tells how the solar group is created based on the previous vision
i.e.
Saturn tells us which planet is created first and which second and what geometrical rule control this creation process.
Shortly
The solar group is one family, all planets are relatives to each other – but Saturn tells us who's brother to whom and who's uncle, who's parent and who's nephew
Saturn Data tells this fact clearly as the sun …Saturn Is The Solar Group Secret
The first question in this research was why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? i.e. why (the Sun diameter/ the moon diameter) = (earth orbital distance/ Earth Moon distance)?
The answer was "That's only Pure Coincidence" (No.1)
Then I found another question…
The Earth-Moon Orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) = 2.58 mkm = Earth daily motion… why?
"That's also Pure Coincidence" (No.2)
Then I found the moon orbit geometrical relationships which are:
6. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters Total (error 1%)
7. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
8. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
9. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius (377000km)
Why the previous relationships are found?
"Surely these are Pure Coincidence" (No.3)
Let's then with more depth, the moon has to move daily a distance = Earth daily motion, otherwise they will be separated from each other.. that means the moon should move daily =2.58 mkm, but we know that the moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (406000km) also 2.58mkm ..why?
"We all know this is Pure Coincidence" (No.4)
Then Metonic Cycle question is produced
Why the moon orbit regresses daily 19 degrees? Why the moon rotates Metonic Cycle which Earth doesn't? let's think with some deep vision
Metonic Cycle period = 6939.75 days
6939.75 days = 19 x 365.25 days (19 sidereal years)
= 235 x 29.53 days (Synodic Month)
= 20 x 346.6 days (nodal year)
The previous data tells us that, the Earth motion is in harmony with Moon and Moon orbit motions, that's why the three motions finish their cycles in the same time \
Why?
"Just Pure Coincidence" (No.5)
I found we need to find some logical and physical explanation behind all these data, I can't accept any of these as Pure coincidences…
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter Orbital Distance Proves, We See Wrongly The Solar Group,Gerges francis
This paper tries to prove the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis No. (1)
- Jupiter Is The Solar Group Central Point
- Jupiter Orbital Distance contradicts the solar group current description
Hypothesis No. (2)
- Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Can't Be An Ellipse
- Earth Moon motion effects on our vision and force us to see Planet Motion Trajectory as an ellipse (which is a wrong vision)
Giant-Impact Hypothesis Supports "Mars Immigration Theory" Gerges francis
THE GIANT-IMPACT HYPOTHESIS suggests that Luna (the Moon) formed from the ejecta of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar System coalesced).[1] The colliding body is sometimes called Theia, from the name of the mythical Greek Titan who was the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon.[2] Analysis of lunar rocks, published in a 2016 report, suggests that the impact may have been a direct hit, causing a thorough mixing of both parent bodies.[3]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant-impact_hypothesis)
The Giant- impact hypothesis supports my theory of "Mars Immigration"
Shortly
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm, and because of an earthquake in the solar system Mars had immigrated from it to its new orbital distance 227.9 mkm
And during this motion
- Mars had collided With Venus At First And Then With Earth At End
- Mars passed after the collision and didn't adhered with the Earth -instead – Mars collisions caused some debris to be thrown only
- The main point here is that – Mars motion direction was from the Point 84 mkm to the point 227.9 mkm – Mars in this motion was impacted by a great force that means all Mars collisions occurred during this motion caused its debris to be thrown In The Same Motion Direction and because of that the debris followed Mars to its new orbital distance but because Earth Mass is Greater than Mars the debris moved around Earth creating the Earth Moon.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury Day needs 84 = 5040 seconds minutes to be 176 days
This Data analysis supports my claim that
"The Matter and Distance are created together by the Same Energy"
i.e.
The Matter is Energy
The Distance is Energy
The Space (distance) is a complementary to the Matter,
Means the matter can't be created without Space
Imagine a classroom
The classroom is NOT a space will be filled with desks..
It's mistaken
Each desk is brought inside the classroom, brought with it a part of the classroom floor
Now, the classroom floor is created with the desks and NOT without..
That's the concept I want to suggest
The matter and distance are complementary to each other … no one of both can found alone
This idea can easily be concluded from Matter Theory of Creation
Where the Theory supposes that the Matter is bright fringes and the distance is dark fringes
We can see that the matter is created as a rate to its complementary distance..
This meaning we concluded easily from the Equation
Planet orbital distance = Planet diameter * 1092
Note Please: 84 minutes = 5040 seconds but (71)2 = 5041
Does mars fit his position is the solar group why notGerges francis
The Claim
Mars Data Doesn't Fit his Position In The Solar Group
Because
Mars had immigrated from his original point with distance 84 million km from the sun and dwell in his new point with distance 227.9 million km from the sun (My Conclusion)
So Mars Data was fit to his original position (with distance 84 mkm)
But
Mars Data doesn't fit his new position (with distance 227.9 mkm)
This paper analyzes Mars Data to prove this Fact.
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theoryGerges francis
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through HistoryGerges francis
I- The Paper Claim:
- The Solar Planets Order was (Pluto – Mercury – Mars ……..etc)
But
- Mars Ancient Orbital Distance was 84 millions km, found after Mercury Immediately….
- Pluto was before Mercury in order and nearer to the sun (or may Pluto was the Mercury Moon)
- This order I suggest based on the rule "Greater Diameter Needs Greater Orbital Distance". (This Rule Is Discussed In This Paper Introduction)
Then
- Mars immigrated and dwelt in its new point with orbital distance = 227.9 mkm.
- Mars Immigration was process has a great effect on the solar group especially on Pluto (the smallest planet). And As a result of it, Pluto also immigrated and dwelt in its new point with orbital distance =5870 mkm
- The Planet diameter and orbital distance rule is (A Greater Diameter needs A Greater Orbital Distance) is disturbed by Mars and Pluto Immigration.
- Mars is Exceptional Planet in different arguments because of its immigration..
I- The Claim Explanation:
How to prove this fact?
- The Solar Group is One Body (Building) – If this is a fact- So, Each Planet Data is created based on the other planets data –i.e. if Mars changed his orbital distance through the solar group history – This Change should be Registered in the solar planets data-
i.e.
- Mars Immigration Argument Is Another Proof For The Claim ….… "The Solar Group Is One Body and Each Planet is A Member Of It", Or "The Solar Group Is One Building And Each Planet Is A Part Of This Same Building"…
The Solar Group Geometry Analysis (Questions & Answers) (Part I)Gerges francis
The Solar Group Geometry Analysis (Questions & Answers) (Part I)
This Paper claims the following:
- The Solar group current Description and theory are incorrect and insufficient
- The Solar group current Description and theory contradicts the solar planet data geometrical analysis.
In this paper we discuss 6 questions with their answers which can show and prove the solar group current theory and description weakness and insufficiently…
The Questions Are In Following:
1- How The Planet Diameter Is Created?
2- How The Planet Orbital Distance Is Defined? By Gravity Force …is it True?
3- What's The Most Near Distribution For The Solar Planets Order?
4- Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit Circumference?
5- Why The Light Velocity Is The Universe Highest Velocity?
6- Can The Planet Mass be created independently from the other planets masses?
Theory of Matter Creation supposes that, the matter is bright fringes and the distance is dark fringes..
i.e.
The planet is bright fringes and his orbital distance is dark fringes both of them are created from the same light coherence that explains the planet diameter and his orbital distance relationship…
Please review
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
This study tries to answer the question "How does the planet move?" let's summarize the answer in following:
- The planet is created and connected with a light beam..
- So this light beam moves firstly
- Then the Planet moves following this light beam with different rate of time (the planet original motion)
- This motion (action) has a reaction (another motion) which =99% of the original one
i.e.
- The planet motion contains 3 motions together (the light beam motion- the planet original motion and the planet reacted motion which =99% of the original one) (hypothesis)
- Do these 3 motions of the solar planet interpret the planet 3 cycles (Planet rotation cycle – Planet day – Planet orbital period)?
This paper discusses this idea trying to prove it…
Why we see the sun disc = the moon disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)Gerges francis
This paper discusses Mercury Data to prove 3 conclusions which are:
1- The solar group is one machine, each planet is a gear in this same machine. (i.e. each solar planet depends on other solar planets in his Origin And Motion).
2- Mercury Data shows a relationship with Jupiter can't be explained by gravity concept or any current theory. (i.e. The Solar Group Current Theory Is Insufficient)
3- Special Theory of Relativity provides empirical results only and need a theoretical extension to be a complete theory. (Specifically, the theory needs to explain why the lorentz length contraction phenomenon is done and what geometrical effect it practices)
The paper also suggest the following idea
"The Time existence depends on relativistic effects"
i.e.
"Time Definition" is a process extends beyond the human daily experiences
This paper completes the previous discussion
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
Solar system geometry (summarized discussion part 2)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypothesis
The Sun Rays Is Produced By Planets Motions Energies Accumulations
The paper tries to prove this fact
Solar Group Alternative Description
1- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory …i.e.
2- The Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of this same building-
3- Also The solar group is similar to a train and each planet is a carriage of it.
4- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in it
5- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine, each planet is a gear in it
6- Planet moves with all other planets together as a train moves with all carriages –
Description Basic Concept
Planets cooperation and integration is the reason of their existence and motions.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy.. Can that be possible?
Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for same content, i.e. it's possible to create matter & space of energy
Another Example
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the experiment explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used (light)–outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data complementary to each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis shows the solar planets dependency.
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories.
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim:
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
Abstract
Why does Earth rotate 4-years Cycle?
Because there's an interaction and coherence between Earth, Moon and Mars Motions, this interaction causes this 4-years Cycle
This paper tries to prove this fact, and explains its mechanism.
Also we discuss here the "Distance" and "Time" Definitions, explaining how to distinguish between the matter and space.
Mercury Jupiter Distance with Mercury other data supports my claim that,
"The Solar Group is One Machine, Each planet is One Gear In It"
Let's review this idea here again….. I suggest that,
The Matter is created from Energy (this is true based on the Equation E=mc2)
The Distance is created from Energy (my hypothesis)
That means, the Matter and Distance are created from the same Energy,
That means, the whole solar group is created from the same one energy which guarantees the motions harmony.
The matter should be seen as point of light coherence or energy lines connection where the energy is carried in the distances as in matters
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)Gerges francis
Paper hypotheses
- Light Motion For 1 Second causes Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day (my research 5th hypothesis)
- Planet Matter is created as a result of Planet motion
- Solar system matters are created by planet motion for 2 Solar Days
- Saturn orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 1 solar day ("The Train Motion Concept")
- Uranus orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 2 Solar Days
- That explains the theoretical reason behind Uranus and Saturn strong relationship
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (VI)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Moon Orbital Distance Is Proportional To Its Parent Circumference
-This hypothesis is suggested by the previous observation, which are
o Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
o Neptune moves during its day period a distance = 2 x circumferences
o Uranus moves during its day period a distance = 2.6 x circumferences
- This observations lead us to conclude that, Planet motion may depend on its circumference or the motion distance be function of the planet circumference..
- Then, the moon orbital radiuses analysis lead us to conclude this hypothesis, this paper tries to prove it
- By the hypothesis prove, many other old claims can be supported in addition, let's write them down here:
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km (Part 2) (Revised)Gerges francis
This Paper discusses the following hypothesis:
("2A" are needed for "1B")
The Previous Rule Controls The Solar Planets Basic Data
Hypothesis Explanation
It tells – all basic solar planets data are created based on the previous rule – we need 2 Equal Values to interact with 1 different Value…
Example (No. 1)
Solar Planets Diameters Total = 2 Jupiter Diameters + 1 Saturn Diameter
How To Understand The Previous Idea:
Solar Group Is One Trajectory of Energy – Each Planet Is A Point On It
a. The Planet Matter (Mass) is Created of Energy (E=mc2supports that)
b. The Planet Orbital Distance (Space) is Created of Energy (Hypothesis)
Solar Group can be similar to one machine each plant is a gear in it (or one body and each planet is a member of this same body)
The Solar Group is Created from only One Energy
The Solar Planets and their orbital distances are created depending on Each Other
The basic solar planets data are created based on this rule ("2A" for "1B")
Abstract
According to Carl Anderson Experiment 1932, by which he produced electron & positron from Gamma rays
I claim the solar system is created by the light through this same way, where, I claim
1- The Earth is The Big Electron
(i.e. the Earth Atom has a positive nucleus charge and cloud of electrons move around this nucleus "which is Real for the Earth")
2- 4 Planets (Mercury, Venus, Moon & Mars) together are The Big Positron
(i.e. The four planets Atoms have a negatives nucleuses charges and clouds of positrons move around these nucleuses (which is supposed)
3- The Attraction between the 5 inner planets depends on The Charge Attraction, Avoiding The Gravity Concept.
4 - The Outer Planets are depended on The Inner Planets
5- The sun is the solar system motions result
This paper tries to prove the Previous Theory.
(The solar system geometry is a series of papers, this first paper is dedicated for the previous theory proves only)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Mars ancient orbital distance was 84 mkm and changed to be 227.9 mkm later.
The hypothesis explanation
- Mars was the next planet after Mercury with orbital distance =84 mkm and Mars had migrated into Mars current orbital distance (227.9 mkm)
- Through Mars Displacement from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), Mars had collided with Venus and then with Earth and then reach to its current orbital distance point
- By these collisions debris the Earth could create its own moon and also Mars moons are created in addition to the asteroid belt.
- Means, Mars itself caused the Earth moon creation by its Migration in place of the Planet (Theia) supposed by the Giant-impact hypothesis.
- Mars Migration theory answers the Giant-impact hypothesis questions, are:
- What's The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin?– It's Venus
- Why Venus couldn't create its own moon from the collisions debris? Because Mars had moved from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm), So Mars had pushed all debris in its motion direction because of that Venus found no debris around it to create its own moon, But Earth gravity is grater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their motion momentum, because of that Earth could create its own moon.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Definition Of Motion (I)
Paper Hypotheses
1- Planets data are created relative to each other
2- Mercury & Pluto Motions define the distance between them
3- Mercury & Pluto Motions define Saturn Orbital Distance
4- Solar System is one building and each planet is a point in it
5- Solar system moves one unified motion as a train moves with all carriages
Mercury Motion During Its Day = Mercury Jupiter Distance. (Why?)Gerges francis
Abstract
-Mercury moves during its day period (175.94 solar days) a distance (720.7 mkm)= = Mercury Jupiter Distance
-Venus moves during its orbital period (224.7 solar days) a distance (670 mkm) = = Venus Jupiter Distance (error 1.5%)
-Earth moves during its orbital period (365.25 solar days) a distance = Earth Jupiter Distance (when Earth & Jupiter be at different sides from the sun 778.6 mkm +149.6 mkm = 929 mkm) (error 1%)
Why do The 3 Planets Move During Their Orbital Periods (Or Day Period) Distances = Their Distances To The Jupiter?!
My Answer Which I Try To Prove In This Paper.
-There's A Light Beam Its Velocity =1.16 Mkm/Sec
-This light beam (1.16 mkm/sec) creates the orbital and internal distances between all solar planets and Specially between (Jupiter, Mercury, Venus & Earth)
-The inner 3 planets (Mercury – Venus – Earth) are followers to Jupiter and they consist together one unified motion – that means- they are 3 carriages in one train and they move complementary motions to each other
-Jupiter is the guide and head of the 3 inner planets (Mercury, Venus & Earth) – Jupiter works as a reference for them (Specifically, Jupiter is the source of energy for these 3 inner planets).
Jupiter & The 3 Planets Data Prove, There's A Light Velocity =1.16mkm/Sec
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1.There's a velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
2.Jupiter proves that "The Solar System Is One Machine"
3.The solar system is one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in this same machine.
4.Jupiter & the three inner planets are created depending on each other
5.Mars is created depending on Jupiter & Saturn cooperation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
A Research Presentation Summary
Abstract
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (No Planet moves by the sun gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation and using to prove (Mars Migration Theory) and (The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Similar to The sun gravity concept is unreal (proves) (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...Wasswaderrick3
In this book, we use conservation of energy techniques on a fluid element to derive the Modified Bernoulli equation of flow with viscous or friction effects. We derive the general equation of flow/ velocity and then from this we derive the Pouiselle flow equation, the transition flow equation and the turbulent flow equation. In the situations where there are no viscous effects , the equation reduces to the Bernoulli equation. From experimental results, we are able to include other terms in the Bernoulli equation. We also look at cases where pressure gradients exist. We use the Modified Bernoulli equation to derive equations of flow rate for pipes of different cross sectional areas connected together. We also extend our techniques of energy conservation to a sphere falling in a viscous medium under the effect of gravity. We demonstrate Stokes equation of terminal velocity and turbulent flow equation. We look at a way of calculating the time taken for a body to fall in a viscous medium. We also look at the general equation of terminal velocity.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
What is greenhouse gasses and how many gasses are there to affect the Earth.moosaasad1975
What are greenhouse gasses how they affect the earth and its environment what is the future of the environment and earth how the weather and the climate effects.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
Seminar of U.V. Spectroscopy by SAMIR PANDASAMIR PANDA
Spectroscopy is a branch of science dealing the study of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy refers to absorption spectroscopy or reflect spectroscopy in the UV-VIS spectral region.
Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy is an analytical method that can measure the amount of light received by the analyte.
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Salas, V. (2024) "John of St. Thomas (Poinsot) on the Science of Sacred Theol...Studia Poinsotiana
I Introduction
II Subalternation and Theology
III Theology and Dogmatic Declarations
IV The Mixed Principles of Theology
V Virtual Revelation: The Unity of Theology
VI Theology as a Natural Science
VII Theology’s Certitude
VIII Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
All the contents are fully attributable to the author, Doctor Victor Salas. Should you wish to get this text republished, get in touch with the author or the editorial committee of the Studia Poinsotiana. Insofar as possible, we will be happy to broker your contact.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Unveiling the Energy Potential of Marshmallow Deposits.pdf
The sun gravity concept is unreal (proves)
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
The Sun Gravity Concept is Unreal (Proves)
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
Course Student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 mrwaheid@gmail.com / georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 31st
March 2019
1- Abstract
The Hypothesis
"Ther"Ther"Ther"There's No Gravity Found By The Sun"e's No Gravity Found By The Sun"e's No Gravity Found By The Sun"e's No Gravity Found By The Sun"
This paper provides 5 proves for this hypothesis which are:
1- Planet Orbital Distance disproves The Sun Gravity Concept (Point No.2)
2- The Sun Gravity Value disproves The Sun Gravity Concept (Point No.3)
3- The Planet Velocity disproves The Sun Gravity Concept (Point No.4)
4- The moon orbit analysis proves the solar group current description is incorrect.
(Point No.5)
5- The Solar Group is One Machine consists of all solar planets. (Point No.6)
Let's discuss these proves in the following points
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Twitter https://twitter.com/TawdrousF
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrousBest
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
2- Planet Orbital Distance disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
2-1 How The Planet Orbital Distance Is Defined?
By gravity…the gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance..!
Let's examine this answer
1st
critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's
some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's a similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
URANUS DIAMETER IS GREATER THAN NEPTUNE DIAMETER,
where
NEPTUNE MASS IS GREATER THAN URANUS…
That tells us the solar planets order is done Depending On The Diameter And Not On
The Mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
2nd
Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation
equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why
the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation
equation (m/r2
)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept
the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital
Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
It's hard fighting – but for what? What we should do to understand better the solar
group geometry? We should see the contradictions between the planet data and the
current theory, then we should create an alternative theory (much better theory) to
explain the solar planets motions and origin
Please read
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0322
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
2-2 Solar Planet Orbital Distance Equation
d2
= 4do(d-do) (Gerges Francis Tawdrous Equation)
Where
d= Planet Orbital Distance do= Previous Planet Orbital Distance
There are 3 exceptions which are:
- Earth depends on Mercury
- Mars depends on Venus - Pluto depends on Uranus
The equation disturbances are found only with Mars, Pluto as we expected and Earth also as
a result of Mars immigration
Let's see this equation using in following
1-
Venus Orbital Distance 108.2 mkm)2
= 4* Mercury Orbital Distance 57.9mkm x 50.3mkm
Mercury Venus distance. (No error)
2-
(Earth Orbital Distance.149.6 mkm)2
= 4* Mercury Orbital Distance 57.9mkm x91.7 mkm
Mercury Earth distance) (2.5%)
3-
(Mars Orbital Distance 227.9 mkm)2
= 4* Venus Orbital Distance 108.2 mkm x 120 mkm
Venus Mars distance) (No error)
4-
(Ceres Orbital Distance 415 mkm)2
= 4* Mars Orbital Distance 227.9 mkm x187 mkm
Mars Ceres distance) (No error)
5-
(Jupiter Orbital Distance 778.6 mkm)2
= 4* Ceres Orbital Distance 415 mkm x 364 mkm
Ceres Jupiter distance) (No error)
6-
(Saturn Orbital Distance 1433.5 mkm)2
= 4* Jupiter Orbital Distance 778.6 mkm x 655.7
mkm Jupiter Saturn distance) (No error)
7-
(Uranus Orbital Distance 2872.5 mkm)2
= 4* Saturn Orbital Distance 1433.5 mkm x 1439
mkm Saturn Uranus distance) (No error)
8-
(Neptune Orbital Distance 4495.1 mkm)2
= 4* Uranus Orbital Distance 2872.5 mkm x
1622 mkm Uranus Neptune distance) (4%)
9-
(Pluto Orbital Distance 5870 mkm)2
= 4* Uranus Orbital Distance 2872.5 mkm x 2997.5
mkm Uranus Pluto distance) (No error)
3-4-1 The Discussion
It's clear that each planer orbital distance is related to his previous neighbor but the masses
are not related! How can we explain this data (also Bode Law support this argument)..
Note please
The Equation works perfectly with all solar planets, except with Mars (again the same
planet which causes the confusion in the previous argument 2-1) and also with Pluto and
Earth Why? Because of Mars and Pluto immigration Please read
Mars Immigration Proves (Revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0268
and Pluto was "The Mercury Moon" http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0331
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
3- The Sun Gravity Value disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
Gravity Equation (Gerges Francis Equation)
Solar Planet Gravity Equation
I- Data
Table No. 1
Planet Equation Resulted Registered Error
The Sun (Earth/Sun diameters rate)2
(Sun Mass/
Earth Mass)* earth gravity
= (1/109)2
* 333000*9.8= 274
274 274 0
Moon (3.66)2
x (0.073 / 5.97) x 9.8 1.6 m/sec2
1.6 m/sec2
0
Mercury (2.61)2
x (0.23/5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2
3.7 m/sec2
0
Venus (1.0538)2
x 4.87 /5.97) x 9.8 8.9 m/sec2
8.9 m/sec2
0
Earth 9.8 9.8 9.8 0
Mars (1.878)2
x (0.642 / 5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2 3.7 m/sec2 0
Jupiter (0.0892)2
x (1898 / 5.97) x 9.8 24.7 m/sec2 23.1 m/sec2 6.9%
Saturn (0.10582)2
x (568/5.97) x 9.8 10.44 m/sec2 9 m/sec2 16%
Uranus (0.25)2
x (86.8/5.97) x 9.8 8.9 8.7 2.3%
Neptune (0.2575)2
x (102/ 5.97) x 9.8 11.1 m/sec2
11 m/sec2
0.9%
Pluto (5.337)2
(0.0131 / 5.97) x 9.8 0.6125 m/sec2
0.6 m/sec2
2%
II- Discussion
1. We can see that, the Equation is working sufficiently with all planets and even the
sun follows this same equation, except with Jupiter and Saturn there are big error
(6.9% and 16% respectively…. Why?)
2. Jupiter error is 6.9% which is very near from our rate 7.25%, also for Saturn, if
Saturn diameter in increased with rate 7.25% to be 129500km … in this case there
will be no error in his gravity equation… we know the rate 7.25% (and also 7.1 and
71) all these rates are found as Lorentz length contraction rates, that means the great
error with Jupiter and Saturn are found resulting from the relativistic effects which
supports the equation to be considered as a real equation and trustee one
3. we need to observe and analyze deeply The Sun Equation in row No.1 of the
previous table, because this equation supports my claim that the sun is originated
from the same source from which the solar group is originated, otherwise why the
sun herself follows the same equation? That may support my claim that, the sun rays
is created depends on solar planets motions accumulation….
Please review my paper
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a Real One? http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0381
gravityEarth)
MassEarthThe
MassPlanetThe
()
DiameterPlanetThe
DiameterEarth
(gravityplanetThe 2
××=
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
4- The Planet Velocity disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
The planet velocity analysis shows that, there's a geometrical reason behind this velocity
value which has no relationship to the gravity concept.. i.e. the planet motion doesn't depend
on the gravity… let's see the following data analysis.
I- Planet Velocity daily x another planet Velocity daily = 2π mkm2
Let's examine that is following
(1) 4.095 mkm (Mercury Velocity daily) x 1.535 mkm (Ceres Velocity daily) = 2π mkm2
(2) 3.02 mkm (Venus Velocity daily) x 2.08 mkm (Mars Velocity daily) =2π mkm2
(3) 2.58 mkm (Earth Velocity daily) x 2.41 mkm (Moon Velocity daily) =2π mkm2
II Data (Velocities)
(Max error 1.8%)
2
355.1
VelocityJupiter
VelocityCeres
VelocityCeres
VelocityMars
VelocityVenus
VelocityMercury
A==== (Max error less 1%)
B=== 239.1
VelocityMars
VelocityEarth
VelocityNeptune
VelocityUranus
(Max error 1.6 %)
2
4263.1
VelocityUranus
VelocitySaturn
B== (Max error1.8 %)
(B/A) = (B2
/A2
) = 1.0725 (Max error1.3%)
Note Please (2)
- Pluto orbital period 90588 days = Earth orbital Period 365.25 (2π)3
- I conclude that, the solar group is one trajectory of Energy where Earth and Pluto are
the 2 terminal points of this trajectory… so the rate 2π is found by 2 planets for 3
times to provide the rate (2π)3
which makes Pluto orbital period to depend on Earth
orbital period and by this way, Earth and Pluto be as 2 gears move with other by help
of the other planets (other gears)….
More Interesting Data
a- Earth- Moon circumference 10921 km x 86400 seconds (the solar day seconds) =
940 mkm (Earth orbital circumference)
b- Earth-Moon circumference 10921 km x 27.3 days = 300000 km
c- Earth Diameter 12756 km x 23.45 = 300000 km
- Equation (a) tells us if Earth revolves around the sun in one day only, the moon
circumference will be a distance produce by 1 second motion
A==== 17.1
VelocityPluto
VelocityNeptune
VelocityMars
VelocityMoon
VelocityEarth
VelocityVenus
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
- Equation (b) tells us if the moon rotates around his axis daily, he will moves a
distance = 1 second of light motion
- Equation (c) tells us that Earth diameter 12756 km and axial tilt 23.45 degrees are
bon from the light motion for 1 second (300000km)
A General Conclusion
The previous data tells us that, the solar planets velocities are found by geometrical reasons
behind, where each velocity depends on the others, that means there's no planet velocity is
found by gravity forces… that tells us the gravity was almost a mystery….
To understand much better the previous data we need to recognize the rate 1.0725 which is
created as a result of relativistic effects in the solar group…
In fact we will discuss the previous data with the total solar eclipse general discussion,
which will be in a separated paper … but here we'll discuss only one group of Data … it's
group no. 3 let's start immediately
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
5- The Moon Orbit Analysis proves that, The Solar Group Current Description
Is Incorrect.
The moon orbit data support strongly my claim
Let's see some of them…
5-1 The Moon Orbit Triangle
-Data
Let's suppose C is Earth
- AB = 120536 km = (=Saturn diameter)
- CB = 449000km = (=Jupiter Circumference)
- AC =373000 km = (=Saturn Circumference)= 373000 km = (Earth Moon Distance
when the moon at solar eclipse radius)
Details of CB
- CD= 363000 km =(Earth Moon Distance when the moon at perigee point)
- CF= 406000 km =(Earth Moon Distance when the moon at apogee point)
- DF=FB=43000 km (distance between perigee and apogee)
- AD is Perpendicular on the base CB where AD = DB = 86000 km
- EF=GD =43000 km (DFEG is a square its dimension =43000km)
- EF is perpendicular on the base, so the angle (BEF)= 45 degrees.
All previous dimensions are found based on Pythagoras rule …also.
- A angle = 121.67 degrees
- C angle = 13.33 degrees
- B angle = 45 degrees
More Data:
I- Solar Planets Diameters Total = 2 Jupiter diameters + 1 Saturn diameter
II- Jupiter Diameter = 2 Jupiter Circumference – 2 Saturn Circumference
III-
VI- CD =363000 km = Perigee radius = outer planets diameters total
Discussion:
- In fact the previous triangle is hard to understand… ABC triangle is formed by
values equal Saturn diameter, Saturn Circumference and Jupiter Circumference
but the moon orbit main points are defined clearly by this triangle altitude and
his parallel line created to divide DB into 2 parts ….where Saturn
Circumference = the moon orbital radius at total solar eclipse…. !
12
2
km120536diameterSaturn
km142984diameterJupiter
−
=
π
π
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
- I have tried frequently to show that there are Geometrical Rules Behind The
Matter Creation…this is the main idea in my research ….because the current
theories suppose that the planets are created from an exploded star material by
gravity forces effect…. This concept is absolutely wrong because the planets
matters (diameters and circumferences) can't be created by any random
process… but by geometrical rules.. as we see clearly in the previous triangle..
Conclusions:
- Saturn and Jupiter Diameters are created in interaction with the moon orbit
different radiuses!
- Saturn and Jupiter Diameters are created in interaction with the solar planets
diameters!
Deep Discussion:
- The previous discussion aims to explain two of our main difficulties in the
solar group geometry discovery…which are;
1. The Matter Creation Description
2. The Distance Effect
Let's discuss them in more details
1st
The Matter Creation Description
How the matter is created? This is the historical puzzled question? To create Earth
material from exploded star material that gives us nothing because the material itself
isn't known.. and we don't know how this material is created and why Earth diameter
=12756 km?…. so the current theory gives no explanation for the matter creation
process while in fact – as we have seen – the previous triangle tells us the matter is
created based on geometrical rules…
2nd
The Distance Effect
The gravity concept prevents us to see such geometrical rules –as the previous
triangle show them- because of the distance supposed effect which we have learnt
from the gravity concept… so it's impossible to have any effect from Saturn on the
moon orbit because of the great distance between them…! As the gravity concept
learns!
The Final Conclusions:
I provide here just one claim which is very clear that,
Saturn and Jupiter diameters are created based On Geometrical Rules and with
effect of the moon orbit…
That disproves the matter random creation and the current gravity concept
Otherwise the previous triangle is found by Pure coincidences … "reader is judge"
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
5-2 The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure
Table No.1
"The Solar Planets Diameters Total Relationship With The Moon Orbit"
If Earth diameter = 12756 km, is considered to be = 1
i.e. The Earth Circumference which = 40080 km, will be just =Π
So The Following Is Correct Error
Earth Circumference = Π -
Solar Inner Planets diameter total = Π -
Moon motion free space (from perigee to apogee) = Π
(the free space without the moon diameter)
1.3%
Moon Perigee orbit radius = 9 Π -
Solar outer planets diameters total = 9 Π -
Moon orbit apogee radius =10 Π 1.2
All solar planets diameters total =10 Π 1
2 Jupiter diameter + Saturn diameter =10 Π -
Saturn Circumference =9.5Π
= Moon orbit radius at total solar eclipse
-
Jupiter Circumference =11 Π 1.9
The Sun diameter =11 Π2
1.2
More Data
I. Earth Moon Distance at perigee Point = 363000 km = Solar Outer Planets
Diameter Total (error 1%)
II. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee Point = 406000 km = Solar Planets Diameter
Total
III. The moon orbital distance from perigee to apogee (free space) = 40000 km
= Earth Circumference
IV. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solace eclipse
V. The Sun Diameter = Jupiter Circumference x π
But
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc?
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
400
RaduisEarth
ceCircumfeenOrbitalMoon
DistanceMoonEarth
DistanceOrbitalEarth
DiameterMoon
DiameterSun
===
5-3 Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc?
The following Equation provide some answer for the previous question..!
1/7 = θ = 1/(Mercury orbital inclination)
is the angle in the sun defined by Sun, Earth and moon positions….
θ
The 2 near circles are Earth and Moon where the far one is the sun, angle θ= 0.142984
It's hard to explain all that, let's see more data about this angle
Equation No. 1
Equation No. 2
"AngleEclipseSolarTotal"degrees532.0
DaimeterMoon
DaimeterEarth
sin φθ =×
Equation No. 3
3.66
DaimeterSaturn
nceCircumfereJupiter
DistanceMoonEarth
DiameterSun
D
DaimeterMoon
DaimeterMoon
DaimeterEarth
=====
φ
θ
π
D: is the covered distance on Earth by the total solar umbra shadow =304 km
Equation No. 4
let's remember our question why do we see the Sun Disc = The moon Disc? Because
The Question
Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc?
We have discussed hardly in these papers
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0489
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0322
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0091
DistanceMoon
Distance
sin
Earth
OrbitalEarth
=θ
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
5-4 The Moon Orbit Geometrical Rules Discussion
(1st
Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2
n + (86000km)2
= R2
n+1
(why 86000 km? we'll discuss that in this paper)
(2nd
Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
(3rd
Rule) (Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn+1/ Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn) =1.0725
(4th
Rule) The Rate 365.25
I- (1st
Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2
n + (86000km)2
= R2
n+1
(1st
Rule) Pythagoras Rule
R2
n + (86000km)2
= R2
n+1
I-Data
1) (363000 km = moon orbital radius "At Perigee Point")
2) (86000 km)2
+ (363000 km)2
(perigee radius) = (373000 km)2
(377000 km = total solar eclipse radius error 1%)
3) (86000 km)2
+ (373000 km)2
= (384000 km)2
(384000 km = moon orbital average radius "registered in Nasa Fact sheet")
4) 2x (86000 km)2
+ (384000)2
= (403000 km)2
(406000 km = moon orbital radius "at apogee point")
Please Review
The Moon orbit Analysis
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0422
or
https://www.academia.edu/37856075/The_Moon_Orbit_Analysis
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-orbit-analysis?qid=3ce8a78e-80cf-4304-9738-
1c5722064f9f&v=&b=&from_search=1
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
6- The Solar Group is One Machine Consists Of All Solar Planets.
This is my vision which I fight to prove…
In following I will provide only the general frame of this idea because the details are
discussed in my different papers….
The Vision Hypothesis:
The research provides 5 hypothesis as following
1st
Hypothesis
The Solar Group Is Created From One Energy
1st
Hypothesis Explanation:
1- Planet matter is created of Energy, (E=mc2
) supports that
2- Planet Orbital Distance (Space) is Energy also
3- Planet matter and orbital distance both are created from the same energy (will
be explained with 3rd
hypothesis)
4- The Solar Group Is Created Of One Energy Only (the original energy)
5- The solar group original energy is found before any Planet matter birth
6- The solar group is similar to one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point
on it.
7- The solar group also is similar to a great river has many canals and these canals
created soils on their banks…, so the river with canals and soils are of them are
created from the same water (the same energy)
8- The solar group is similar also to a creature body has different members, where
the same blood moves through these members to provide the needs.
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
Solar Group Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
and
Definition of Space (Revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0307
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
2nd
Hypothesis
The Solar Group Is One Geometrical Structure
2nd
Hypothesis explanation:
1- The solar group original energy depends on geometrical rules (will be
explained with 4th
hypothesis)
2- Theses geometrical rules form together one geometrical structure
3- The solar planets form together one geometrical structure. Each planet is a part
of this same geometrical structure and performs a specific job or contribution
for this same geometrical structure. So all solar planets cooperate and integrate
together to produce this one geometrical structure.
4- The geometrical structure which is produced by the solar planets cooperation
and integration is the same geometrical structure which is produced by the
original energy geometrical rules. The original energy motion can be similar to
a painting drawn by a pencil, then the planets matters are created to move in
the same trajectory which can be similar to colours for this same painting but
the picture is the same (the motion trajectory is the same).
5- Each planet data is created to be suitable for this planet role or contribution in
the general geometrical structure.
6- There's no absent planet, that means the general geometrical structure is a
complete by the found 10 planets (because the original energy created planets
enough for the general geometrical structure)
7- Based on that, Solar Planets Data is in harmony with each other (and
complementary to each other)
8- The planet motion depends on the planet data and not on the gravity
9- Based on the solar planets data general harmony, the planets motions general
harmony is produced. And based on the planets motions general harmony,
Kepler 3rd
law is produced.
10- The general geometrical structure aims to pass the energy through the solar
group (the energy passing through the solar group is similar to the blood
passing through the creature body to provide the required energy)
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics
2018)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (Part No.2) (To Support my Claim Against Nobel Prize
Board Decision in Physics 2018)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0485
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
3rd
Hypothesis
The Planet mass and orbital distance is created from the same energy (Theory of
Matter Creation)
3rd
Hypothesis explanation:
1- In Young Experiment (Double Slit Expeirment), the light coherence produces
bright fringes and dark fringes
2- We see the bright fringes as matters (masses)
3- We see the dark fringes as distances (Space)
4- This explains the planet diameter and orbital distance relationships.
Why we see the bright fringes as matters? This will be answered in the following hypothesis..
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
Why The Light Is The Universe Highest Velocity?
http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0369
and
Special Relativity Hypothesis Reason (Matter Creation Theory)
http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0343
4th
Hypothesis
The solar group moves based on a physical law and not in chaos because of the
human mind effect on the universe (the planet motion and human knowledge
relationship)
4th
Hypothesis explanation:
1- The human mind contains electromagnetic waves (may travel by c velocity)
2- I suppose the realization process in human mind works by c velocity
3- Special Theory of Relativity tells us that, if there's a difference in velocity =c
between 2 observers each one will see the other as light beam… but if both
observers moves by c velocity there's no difference in velocity so both of them
will see the other as a matter
4- That's why we see the bright fringes as matters because our minds works by
this same velocity..
5- That answers why the planet moves by a physical law and no in chaos…
because the matter in the universe is created as an effect of the human mind on
the universe.
Note Please: the electric pulses moves slowly in the human body liquids because the
light moves slowly in the liquids, but the light will restore his velocity in vacuum…
which proves there's a motion with c velocity inside the human mind.. (Note also, the
realization process is the responsible for vision, that tells the effect on vision in fact is
effect on realization process!)
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
The Observer Effect On The Observation Results (Space = Energy=mc2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0343
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
5th
Hypothesis
Earth Moon is The Solar Group Energy Motion indicator
5th
Hypothesis explanation:
1- The Solar Group Energy is reflected inside the moon orbit (to concentrate the
energy)
2- The reflected energy in the moon orbit can be similar to a sea of water and the
moon is a paper boat. That's why the moon is the energy motion indicator
3- The solar group energy is reflected in the moon obit with small values (shorter
distances) because of lorentz length contraction effect
4- There are relativistic effects in the solar group which enable the solar group
whole energy to be reflected in the moon obit to concentrate the energy
5- We can't observe the high velocity which produces the relativistic effects but
we can observe the relativistic effects in the planets different data
6- The relativistic effects cause the distances values to be seen in time values and
vice versa…
This Hypothesis is discussed in following papers
The Moon Orbit Analysis
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0422
The Moon Geometry
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0389
The Conclusions
1- The Solar Planets motions trajectory is a pyramid
2- The planet motion trajectory is a square and not an ellipse
3- The energy concentration in the moon orbit aims to produce the sun rays where
the sun rays are produced on the moon orbit energy
These Conclusions are discussed in following papers
The Solar Group Geometrical Structure is A Pyramid (Revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0060
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0135
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
Gerges Francis Twadrous Curriculum Vitae
http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
or
https://www.academia.edu/38285624/Gerges_Francis_Tawdrous_Curriculum_Vitae_.doc
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/gerges-francis-tawdrous-curriculum-vitae
Author Other Papers
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III)
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0489
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0322
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0091
What's The Solar Planet Nature?
http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0038
Planet Orbital Eccentricity Disproves the Solar Group Current Description
http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0501
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0291
Solar Planet Data Geometrical Concepts disproves the Current Theory
http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0230
The Relativistic Effects Reason
http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0097
Life Is Found On Earth Only (Claim)
http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0422
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a Real One?
http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0381
Vacuum Energy Theory
http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0163
The Moon Orbit Triangle
http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0082
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Twitter https://twitter.com/TawdrousF
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrousBest