Gerry McGovern is the author of World Wide Waste, and an expert on sustainability and digital.
In his keynote 'Earth experience design' Gerry talks about digital as a world of short-term thinking focused on selling superficial wants, and killing our planet.
"We need wisdom, truth, ethics and an understanding of worth that measures the impacts of our designs at an ecosystem level. We must become champions of maintenance and reuse, rather than this constant, relentless and planetary destructive cool newness and innovation cults. We can design great things with so much less of the earth’s energy. We can be part of highly efficient organizations while using so much less data. Let us not go down in history as Generation Waste, the designers whose proudest moment was to fashion the final nail. If we designed our way into this mess, we can design our way out of it."
47. 52
501
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2011 2022
JavaScript: 900% kB growth – 2011 to 2022
• 37% of mobile page’s
JavaScript bytes are unused
• 80 petabytes a month unused
• 54,000 metric tons of CO2
• 37 million trees
• JavaScript budget: 350 KB
https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2020/jav
48. Calculating the pollution cost of website analytics (Part 4)
If 50 million websites are actively using Google Analytics, then according to my
calculations this could be resulting in 100 million kg of CO2 pollution a year. You’d need
to plant 10 million trees to deal with that sort of pollution.
Most of these 50 million websites will find out very little by using Google Analytics
because the vast majority of analytics data is not useful to a typical organization. If you
are using Google Analytics you are slowing down your site. For what? You have also
signed up to be a surveillance capitalist. You think you are getting Google Analytics for
free, when in fact Google is using you to track people because selling the data they get
from tracking people is how they make 90% of their revenue. If you have Google Analytics
on your site—or any other tracking software—then you are an unpaid tracker for
surveillance capitalism. Those nice little colorful social media share buttons are spying on
the people who visit your site and sending their info to Twitter or Facebook. Why? Why do
you do that?
Tracking has many costs. It makes the Web heavier and slower. It creates a Web of
psychological control. It strips us of our privacy. Why? Most of this tracking and analysis
of what people do on a website doesn’t even improve revenue. It just adds weight and
complexity.
A Dutch national broadcaster removed tracking software from its website and saw
revenue rise.
After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges in Europe—and kept
growing ad revenue.
In January 2020, Gartner predicted that by 2025, 80% of marketers who have
invested in personalization will drop their personalization efforts.
Why? Not everyone likes being tracked, likes allowing companies to know about their
inner lives. The more digital we become the more we will realize that data privacy is a
human right.
Data analysis is really, really hard to do well. If you have a huge spike in visitors coming to
your website, is that a good or a bad thing? Are the Web teams of government health
websites dreaming about pandemics in the hope of getting more visitors? Website
analytics metrics feed the Cult of Volume. Often, marketers and communicators are
addicted to volume, chasing the next hit as they try and turn their visitors into addicts
through “engagement” tactics. Such tactics rarely add value for anyone.
Calculating the pollution cost of website analytics (Part 4)
If 50 million websites are actively using Google Analytics, then according to my
calculations this could be resulting in 100 million kg of CO2 pollution a year. You’d need
to plant 10 million trees to deal with that sort of pollution.
Most of these 50 million websites will find out very little by using Google Analytics
because the vast majority of analytics data is not useful to a typical organization. If you
are using Google Analytics you are slowing down your site. For what? You have also
signed up to be a surveillance capitalist. You think you are getting Google Analytics for
free, when in fact Google is using you to track people because selling the data they get
from tracking people is how they make 90% of their revenue. If you have Google Analytics
on your site—or any other tracking software—then you are an unpaid tracker for
surveillance capitalism. Those nice little colorful social media share buttons are spying on
the people who visit your site and sending their info to Twitter or Facebook. Why? Why do
you do that?
Tracking has many costs. It makes the Web heavier and slower. It creates a Web of
psychological control. It strips us of our privacy. Why? Most of this tracking and analysis
of what people do on a website doesn’t even improve revenue. It just adds weight and
complexity.
A Dutch national broadcaster removed tracking software from its website and saw
revenue rise.
After GDPR, The New York Times cut off ad exchanges in Europe—and kept
growing ad revenue.
In January 2020, Gartner predicted that by 2025, 80% of marketers who have
invested in personalization will drop their personalization efforts.
Why? Not everyone likes being tracked, likes allowing companies to know about their
inner lives. The more digital we become the more we will realize that data privacy is a
human right.
Data analysis is really, really hard to do well. If you have a huge spike in visitors coming to
your website, is that a good or a bad thing? Are the Web teams of government health
websites dreaming about pandemics in the hope of getting more visitors? Website
analytics metrics feed the Cult of Volume. Often, marketers and communicators are
addicted to volume, chasing the next hit as they try and turn their visitors into addicts
through “engagement” tactics. Such tactics rarely add value for anyone.
HTML
39 KB
PDF
141 KB