Georgeli EAS1060 10/2/2016 SUMMARY AND RESPONSE ESSAY Summary Justin Pope writes ranks of Foreign students on US campuses published by community college Week in 2012. In the article, Pope discusses that there is a significant and rapid rise in the number of foreign students. There are a series of benefits and problems associated with this rise. The remarkable increase in the number of international students in the US universities is something that cannot be easily avoided and it is bound to continue with time (Pope, 2012). However, it is clear that this brings more benefits than problems. Initially, Pope talked about the rate at which international students in the US has risen over the last five years. This rise is prominently phenomenal, especially for Chinese students. International enrollment at United States colleges and universities has grown nearly 6% in the last year. These numbers reflect the transformation of the nation’s public learning institutions in an era where there is notably diminished state support. A look at 25 campuses holding most international students reveals that a dozen of them have increased enrolment for international students by 40 percent in five years (Pope, 2012). This is according to data that has been collected by the institute of international education. Of all these campuses, only one is public where a significant number comes from the largest ten states including Indiana, Purdue, Ohio state and Michigan state as well as the Universities of Minnesota and Illinois. Ambitious universities are highly appreciative of the global vibe as well as perspectives brought to their Midwestern campuses by international students. Tuition fees offered by international students make it possible for public universities to continue offering scholarships as well as financial assistance to domestic students (Pope, 2012). On a national scale, US campuses held 765,000 international students where China had 158,000 with the top score followed closely by India, South Korea and then Saudi Arabia. The presence of international students has a significant economic appeal, and this promotes their acceptance in a bid way. Out of state recruitment, whether international or domestic is quite sensitive especially for public universities, this fuels charges that students of the in-state taxpayers are being denied available slots (Pope, 2012). The article argues that it 's hard to prepare students for a global economy when they are not exposed to students from abroad. International students bring revenue. However, there are also associated costs. Universities are obliged to expand international advising, English instruction as well as targeted mental health services. Expanding these numbers does not help a great deal but makes to easier to find a bubble (Pope, 2012). Wang, a Chinese student, observes that his experience in the Michigan University has been excellent, agreeing that the ...