The document outlines the concept of 'further more' in game transactional analysis, highlighting a back-and-forth dynamic between a plaintiff and defendant. It emphasizes how paranoid defendants often misinterpret humor or metaphor, leading to frustrating exchanges. The author, Manu Melwin Joy, also notes restrictions on the use of his slides for personal purposes.

1. Further more – Game
Transactional Analysis

2. Prepared By
Manu Melwin Joy
Assistant Professor
Ilahia School of Management Studies
Kerala, India.
Phone – 9744551114
Mail – manu_melwinjoy@yahoo.com
Kindly restrict the use of slides for personal purpose.
Please seek permission to reproduce the same in public forms and presentations.

3. Further more
• In further more, the
plaintiff makes one
accusation after the
other. The defendant
replies to each “ I can
explain”.

4. Further more
• The plaintiff pays not
attention to explanation, but
as soon as the defendant
pauses, he launches into his
next indictment with
another further mores which
is followed by another
explanation – a typical
parent child interchange.

5. Further more
• Further more is played most
intensively by paranoid
defendants. Because of their
literalness, it is particularly easy
for them to frustrate accusers
who express themselves in
humorous or metaphorical
terms.
• In general, metaphors are the
most obvious traps to avoid in a
game of “Furthermore”.

6. References

7. Thank You