The document provides an overview of political and economic freedom across Southeast and East Asia based on the Freedom Barometer index. It discusses the need for the index, how freedom is measured using indicators for political freedom, rule of law, and economic freedom. Sources for the data are also outlined. Country profiles for 14 Asian nations are then presented, summarizing levels of freedom based on the indicators.
Registration and accreditation of political partiesIAGorgph
Presented by Comelec to visiting senior leaders of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front attending the political party building training organized by the Institute for Autonomy & Governance and the Konrad Adnauer Stiftung. Manila | March 28, 2014
Towards a new state in Myanmar
UPLOADED BY
Michael Lidauer-VIEWS-222
https://www.academia.edu/8144441/Towards_a_new_state_in_Myanmar
Towards a new state in Myanmar
UPLOADED BY
Michael Lidauer-VIEWS-222
kontakt@wahlbeobachtung.org
http://www.wahlbeobachtung.org/
Introduction
The state in Myanmar has gone through several incarnations since pre-colonial times.
1
After decades of military rule (1958–60, 1962–74, 1988–2010) and/or one-party-regime (1974–88), the 2008 Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar establishes the basis for new gov-ernmental institutions and new modes of governance. This constitution – the third for the country following those from 1947 and 1974
2
– has been heavily criticized by democracy activists and opposition parties inside the country and by the international community for not meeting basic international standards for democratic governance. The strong role of the military, in particular the provision for reserved seats in the legislature, has been especially criticized. In fact, the question whether to accept the new constitution as a preliminary framework – that could provide a transitional pathway, opening a window of opportunity for opposition forces to re-engage in politics – was a question of principle for political parties prior to the 2010 elections. These elections were held on the basis of the new constitution. Several parties split over this question, some deciding on a boycott while splinter groups or newly founded parties decided to contest the polls
India is a constitutional democracy with a parliamentary system of government, and at the heart of the system is a commitment to hold regular, free and fair elections. These elections determine the composition of the government, the membership of the two houses of parliament, the state and union territory legislative assemblies, and the Presidency and vice-presidency.The mainstay of a democratic society .Elections helps to solve the problem of succession in leadership and thus contributes to the continuation of democracy .
Registration and accreditation of political partiesIAGorgph
Presented by Comelec to visiting senior leaders of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front attending the political party building training organized by the Institute for Autonomy & Governance and the Konrad Adnauer Stiftung. Manila | March 28, 2014
Towards a new state in Myanmar
UPLOADED BY
Michael Lidauer-VIEWS-222
https://www.academia.edu/8144441/Towards_a_new_state_in_Myanmar
Towards a new state in Myanmar
UPLOADED BY
Michael Lidauer-VIEWS-222
kontakt@wahlbeobachtung.org
http://www.wahlbeobachtung.org/
Introduction
The state in Myanmar has gone through several incarnations since pre-colonial times.
1
After decades of military rule (1958–60, 1962–74, 1988–2010) and/or one-party-regime (1974–88), the 2008 Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar establishes the basis for new gov-ernmental institutions and new modes of governance. This constitution – the third for the country following those from 1947 and 1974
2
– has been heavily criticized by democracy activists and opposition parties inside the country and by the international community for not meeting basic international standards for democratic governance. The strong role of the military, in particular the provision for reserved seats in the legislature, has been especially criticized. In fact, the question whether to accept the new constitution as a preliminary framework – that could provide a transitional pathway, opening a window of opportunity for opposition forces to re-engage in politics – was a question of principle for political parties prior to the 2010 elections. These elections were held on the basis of the new constitution. Several parties split over this question, some deciding on a boycott while splinter groups or newly founded parties decided to contest the polls
India is a constitutional democracy with a parliamentary system of government, and at the heart of the system is a commitment to hold regular, free and fair elections. These elections determine the composition of the government, the membership of the two houses of parliament, the state and union territory legislative assemblies, and the Presidency and vice-presidency.The mainstay of a democratic society .Elections helps to solve the problem of succession in leadership and thus contributes to the continuation of democracy .
On 19 September 2006, the Royal Thai Armed Forces staged a coup d'état against then prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, abrogated the 1997 constitution and formed a junta called Council for Democratic Reform (CDR). The 2006 interim constitution was then promulgated by King Bhumibol Adulyadej upon advice of the CDR leader, General Sonthi Boonyaratglin. The interim constitution established a Constitutional Convention (CC) and charged it with the duty to draft a new constitution before presenting the draft to the National Legislative Assembly (NLA), a legislature replacing the National Assembly abrogated by the CDR.[1] The CC set up a constituent committee to draw up the draft. The committee consisted of thirty five members, of whom 25 were selected by the CC itself and the other 10 were selected by the CC upon advice of the CDR.
State of Democracy and other Civil Liberties and Freedoms in Afghanistan sinc...Charlie
I look into what Afghanistan was like under the Republic, under 1996-2001 Taliban rule, and then go over how things are shaping up under renewed Taliban rule.
Salient Points of The Draft Charter by Atty. Rodolfo "RV" Vicerra. Presentation for HSF-PPI Seminar on Understanding Federalism for Media Practitioners
RULE OF LAW IN MYANMAR AND ROLE OF THE MILITARY
http://moemaka.com/archives/63287
ဇင္လင္း ● ႏိုင္ငံတကာေရွ႕ေနမ်ား လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးဆိုင္ရာ အစည္းအ႐ုံး (IBAHRI) ၏ “ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံ စစ္ဖက္ဆိုင္ရာနယ္ပယ္ႏွင့္ တပ္မေတာ္အခန္းက႑” အေပၚ ေလ့လာေတြ႕ရွိခ်က္
March 17, 2018
https://www.biicl.org/documents/466_symposium_paper_-_andrew_mcleod_constitutional_transitions_and_the_role_of_the_military_nov_2014_english.pdf?showdocument=1
https://www.ibanet.org/Search/Search.aspx?query=myanmar
The Rule of Law in Myanmar: Challenges and Prospects
https://www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=DE0EE11D-9878...
Briefing on the Rule of Law in Myanmar - mypilar
https://www.mypilar.org/sites/mypilar.org/files/.../rol_report_emref_09.06.16.pdf
The Rule of Law in Myanmar: Challenges and Prospects
www.burmapartnership.org/2012/.../the-rule-of-law-in-myanmar-challenges-and-pros.
On 19 September 2006, the Royal Thai Armed Forces staged a coup d'état against then prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, abrogated the 1997 constitution and formed a junta called Council for Democratic Reform (CDR). The 2006 interim constitution was then promulgated by King Bhumibol Adulyadej upon advice of the CDR leader, General Sonthi Boonyaratglin. The interim constitution established a Constitutional Convention (CC) and charged it with the duty to draft a new constitution before presenting the draft to the National Legislative Assembly (NLA), a legislature replacing the National Assembly abrogated by the CDR.[1] The CC set up a constituent committee to draw up the draft. The committee consisted of thirty five members, of whom 25 were selected by the CC itself and the other 10 were selected by the CC upon advice of the CDR.
State of Democracy and other Civil Liberties and Freedoms in Afghanistan sinc...Charlie
I look into what Afghanistan was like under the Republic, under 1996-2001 Taliban rule, and then go over how things are shaping up under renewed Taliban rule.
Salient Points of The Draft Charter by Atty. Rodolfo "RV" Vicerra. Presentation for HSF-PPI Seminar on Understanding Federalism for Media Practitioners
RULE OF LAW IN MYANMAR AND ROLE OF THE MILITARY
http://moemaka.com/archives/63287
ဇင္လင္း ● ႏိုင္ငံတကာေရွ႕ေနမ်ား လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးဆိုင္ရာ အစည္းအ႐ုံး (IBAHRI) ၏ “ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံ စစ္ဖက္ဆိုင္ရာနယ္ပယ္ႏွင့္ တပ္မေတာ္အခန္းက႑” အေပၚ ေလ့လာေတြ႕ရွိခ်က္
March 17, 2018
https://www.biicl.org/documents/466_symposium_paper_-_andrew_mcleod_constitutional_transitions_and_the_role_of_the_military_nov_2014_english.pdf?showdocument=1
https://www.ibanet.org/Search/Search.aspx?query=myanmar
The Rule of Law in Myanmar: Challenges and Prospects
https://www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=DE0EE11D-9878...
Briefing on the Rule of Law in Myanmar - mypilar
https://www.mypilar.org/sites/mypilar.org/files/.../rol_report_emref_09.06.16.pdf
The Rule of Law in Myanmar: Challenges and Prospects
www.burmapartnership.org/2012/.../the-rule-of-law-in-myanmar-challenges-and-pros.
Elections form the mainstay of our Indian Democracy. Our democratic setup bestows on us the right to elect the representatives of the state. Besides, the elected people have the right to choose the Head of the State. The elections in India have a long history. India has both General and State elections as promoted by our federal structure. The Election Commission of India is the apex body that conducts elections in India. Both the General and State Elections are held as per the rules prescribed by the Election Commission. This Commission is composed of high-ranking government officials and is constituted according to the provisions of the Indian Constitution. A great degree of autonomous power is bestowed on the Election Commission to exercise control over the election process. Even the judiciary has no right to intervene while the electoral process is on.
we are here to help you in the duration of your preparation
feel free to contact us for any query regarding your exam
contact us at : 9454721860, 0522-4241011
or log on to our website : www.iasnext.com
India is a fast developing country in the world where our systems are weak. So there is always a chance of corruption. Who is responsible for this? What action should be taken? What we must keep in the mind is “Nothing is impossible”. If we join our hands together there can be an end to this deep rooted evil. The only thing is it takes time. A little progress everyday leads to a big result one day ……… may be tomorrow. Be GOOD and DO GOOD
Electoral Democracy, Liberal Democracy and the Global Recession of Democracy pastiche_project
Презентація до лекції Ларрі Даймонда "Визначення демократії: виборча, ліберальна демократія, якість демократії", що відбулася в НаУКМА 9 вересня 2013 року у співпраці з Українською школою політичних студій. Ларрі Даймонд розглядає різницю між виборчою та ліберальною демократією та визначає показники оцінки якості демократії. Він також аналізує світові тенденції виборчої і ліберальної демократії та пояснює, чому якість демократії тісно пов'язана зі стабільністю та консолідацією демократії. Ларрі Даймонд є професором Стенфордського університету та старшим науковцем Інституту Гувера. Також він працював в якості радника численних урядових і міжнародних організацій, в тому числі Державного департаменту США, ООН, Світового банку.
The function of the judiciary in preventing the criminalization of politics.pdfFree Law - by De Jure
The criminalization of politics involves criminals entering politics, running for office, and even being elected to the Parliament and state legislature. When discussing election changes, criminalization of politics is at the forefront of the public discourse. A Supreme Court ruling on the criminalization of politics in February 2020 could have far-reaching effects for Indian democracy.
The verdict was rendered in a case of contempt of court brought against the Chief Election Commissioner of India. The petition said that the ECI had failed to take any efforts to ensure the implementation of a 2018 judgment of the bench mandating that political parties declare and publicize all pending criminal charges against their candidates.
A presentation by Siegfried Herzog on German competitiveness with special focus on its SMEs. It was delivered at the SunStar Economic Forum in Cebu City, Philippines, August 26, 2009
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
21. 4.1.1 Brunei “ Journalists in Brunei face considerable restrictions. Legislation enacted in 2001 allows officials to shut down newspapers without cause and to fine and jail journalists for articles deemed “false and malicious.” The largest daily, the Borneo Bulletin, practices self-censorship, though it does publish letters to the editor that criticize government policies. Access to the internet is reportedly unrestricted.” Brunei is not ranked by RWB. Press freedom „ The unicameral Legislative Council has no political standing independent of the sultan.” Absence of undemocratic veto players “ Brunei is not an electoral democracy. The sultan wields broad powers under a long-standing state of emergency, and no direct legislative elections have been held since 1962. Citizens convey concerns to their leaders through government-vetted councils of elected village chiefs.” Status: “not free”. Free and fair elections
22. 4.1.1 Brunei The death penalty has been suspended. „ Brunei’s many “stateless” people, mostly longtime ethnic Chinese residents, are denied the full rights and benefits of citizens, while migrant workers, who comprise 30 to 40 percent of the workforce, are largely unprotected by the labor laws. Women are treated as unequal to men in areas such as divorce, in accordance with Islamic law, but an increasing number of women have entered the workforce in recent years.” Human rights Brunei is not ranked by TI. Corruption „ The constitution does not specifically provide for an independent judiciary; although the courts generally appear to act independently, they have yet to be tested in political cases.” “The Legislative Council appears to have assumed budget review as a regular function in recent years, meeting in 2006, 2007, and 2008 to scrutinize government expenditures. “ Independence of the courts and checks and balances
24. 4.1.2 Burma The military suppresses nearly all basic rights and commits massive human rights abuses with impunity. The death penalty is in full effect. Human rights The military controls all executive, legislative, and judicial powers. Military officers hold most cabinet positions, and active or retired officers hold most top posts in all ministries, as well as key positions in the private sector. Tue miltary controls all judicial powers and uses them frequently against political opposition. Independence of the courts and checks and balances TI ranking is 1,3. Corruption RWB ranking is 94,38 Press freedom There are only undemocratic veto players: military Absence of undemocratic veto players Military dictatorship: no elections since 1992; Freedom House ranking is „not free“. Free and fair elections
26. 4.1.3 Cambodia There is no death penalty. Discrimation against women and ethnic Cham Muslims is a problem. Security forces often act with impunity and are involved in organised crime. Human rights Hun Sen and his ruling party dominate all branches of government. Indepdence of the courts and checks and balances TI ranking is 1,8. „ The judiciary is not independent and is marred by inefficiency and corruption. There is a severe shortage of lawyers, and judges are poorly trained and subject to political pressure from the CPP.” Corruption RWB ranking is 35,50. Press freedom The security forces play a political role. Absence of undemocratic veto players Freedom House ranking is „not free“. „ Prime Minister Hun Sen and the CPP dominate national and local politics through their control of the security forces, officials at all levels of government, and the state-owned media.” Free and fair elections
28. 4.1.4 China Though constitutionally recognized, religious freedom is sharply restricted. Minorities are discrimated against. The death penalty is in full effect. Human rights “ Party members hold almost all top posts in government, the military, and the internal security services, as well as in many economic entities and social organizations. The 3,000-member National People’s Congress (NPC) is China’s largely symbolic parliament.” „ The CCP controls the judiciary and directs verdicts and sentences, particularly in politically sensitive cases.” Independence of the courts and checks and balances TI ranking is 3,6. Corruption RWB ranking is 85,5. „ Freedom of the press remains extremely restricted, despite constitutional free speech guarantees and comparative freedom in private discussion.” Press freedom The CCP is unelected. Absence of undemocratic veto players Freedom House ranking is „not free“. „ The CCP possesses a monopoly on political power, and the party’s nine-member Politburo Standing Committee makes most important political decisions and sets government policy.” Free and fair elections
30. 4.1.5 Indonesia “ Members of unrecognized religions have difficulty obtaining national identity cards. Atheism is not accepted. Independence activists in Papua and in the Moluccas, and labor and political activists in Java and Sulawesi, remain targets for human rights abuses. Discrimination against women persists, particularly in the workplace.” The death penalty is practiced. Human rights The Constitution provides for checks and balances. The Constitutional Court is independent. Without parliament´s consent laws cannot be passed. Independence of the courts and checks and balances TI ranking is 3,6. „ The KPK has been criticized for failing to convict prosecutors and police. Nevertheless, a string of high-profile cases and convictions in 2008 improved the commission’s image.” Corruption RWB ranking is 27. „The country has a large independent media presence. The foreign press has been banned from the restive province of Papua since 2003. Libel laws influence how journalists frame their stories.“ Press freedom The military still largely enjoys impunity and wields political power. Absence of undemocratic veto players Freedom House ranking is „free“. Indonesia is an electoral democracy. Elections in 2009 for the national parliament and the president were free and fair. Free and fair elections
32. 4.1.6 Japan Capital punishment is legal in Japan. Human rights Japan’s judiciary is independent. Emperor Akihito serves as the ceremonial head of state, parliament is vested with legislative powers. Independence of the courts and checks and balances TI ranking is 7,3. C orruption results from the iron triangle system between the government and big business. Corruption RWB rating is 6,5. „ Japan’s press is private and independent, but the presence of press clubs, or kisha kurabu , is an obstacle to press freedom.” Press freedom The military does not wield political veto power. Absence of undemocratic veto players Freedom House rating is „free“. Several political parties compete for power. Free and fair elections
34. 4.1.7 Laos Capital punishment is legal in Laos. Religious freedom is tightly restricted. Discrimination against members of minority tribes is common at many levels. Human rights The LPRP controls all government. „ The courts are corrupt and controlled by the LPRP.” Indepdence of the courts and checks and balances TI ranking is 2. „ Corruption and abuses by government officials are widespread. Official announcements and new laws aimed at curbing corruption are rarely enforced.” Corruption RWB rating is 70. „ Freedom of the press is severely restricted. Any journalist who criticizes the government or discusses controversial political topics faces legal punishment. The state owns all media.” Press freedom The LPRP controls all government. Absence of undemocratic veto players Freedom House rating is „ not free“. „ The 1991 constitution makes the LPRP the sole legal political party and grants it a leading role at all levels of government. The LPRP vets all candidates for election to the rubber-stamp National Assembly, whose 115 members elect the president.” Free and fair elections
36. 4.1.8 Malaysia RWB rating is 39,5. Freedom of expression is constitutionally guaranteed but restricted in practice, encouraging self-censorship and limiting investigative journalism. Press Freedom Capital punishment is legal in Malaysia. Discrimination against women and non-Malays (affirmative action) is a problem. The police is known for its heavy-handed actions and the authoritarian Internal Security Law is applied on a regular basis. Human rights The BN controls national government. Arbitrary or politically motivated verdicts are not uncommon, with the most prominent case being that of Anwar Ibrahim. Indepedence of the courts and checks and balances TI ranking is 5,1. Corruption is rife among government. Corruption The security forces play a political role, if subdued. Absence of undemocratic veto players Freedom House rating is „partly free“. Elections are generally considered free but not fair, e.g. March 2008 elections. Free and fair elections
38. 4.1.9 North Korea RWB rating is 96,50. Only Eritrea is worse. Press Freedom Human rights are practically unkown in North Korea. Human rights The courts are not independent from political influence. See the verdict on Aung Saan Suu Kyi in August 2009. Independence of the courts and checks and balances No TI ranking available. Corruption The regime is a military one. Absence of undemocratic veto players Freedom House rating is „not free“. Elections take place but are not free and fair. Free and fair elections
40. 4.1.10 Philippines RWB ranking is 45. Press Freedom The Muslim separatist conflict have created many human rights violations on both sides. Human rights Judicial independence is strong, as for example the results of the trials against the state administration demonstrate. Independence of the courts and checks and balances TI ranking is 2,3. Corruption Political violence is widespread. Casualties of such terror are often members of the left-wing parties, especially in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM). Absence of undemocratic veto players Freedom House ranking is „partly free“. Free and fair elections
42. 4.1.11 Singapore In relation to the number of citizens in Singapore, there is no other country in the world, where there are so many executions. Apart from that, physical punishments are common. Human rights The overall positive results of the trials, concerning the government, have created suspicion about the objectivity of the courts. Independence of the courts and checks and balances Out of 180 nations Singapore is listed as number 4 (source: Transparency International). Corruption Foreign press can be banned for reporting about domestic issues. Moreover, there exists strict internet regulations. Press Freedom The PAP uses different instruments to repress the opposition. Absence of undemocratic veto players Singapore is not an electoral democracy, although it has a parliamentary system. The PAP (People’s Action Party) controls the country. Free and fair elections
44. 4.1.12 South Korea Human rights are guaranteed. However, ethnic minorities are often socially and legally discriminated against. Human rights The judicial sector is sovereign. Independence of the courts and checks and balances South Korea is number 40 (out of 180) on the 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index. Corruption Press is free to criticize the government. Although the South Koreans are told not to listen to North Korean radio, there is no direct censorship. Press freedom Pluralistic political system: the two largest parties are the UNDP (United New Democratic Party, before: Uri Party) and the GNP (Great National Party). Absence of undemocratic veto players South Korea depicts an electoral democracy: there are free and fair elections. Free and fair elections
46. 4.1.13 Taiwan Human rights are assured. Despite huge progresses, women are not treated equally in today’s Taiwan. Human rights The judicial branch is independent. Independence of the courts and checks and balances Taiwan achieves 5.7 out of 10 points in the 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index. Corruption Nowadays, every branch of the media is able to publish freely. In the past, the internet and TV stations were regulated. Press freedom There are two major parties: pro-independence DPP (Democratic Progressive Party) and the nationalist KMT (translated: Chinese Nationalist Party). Absence of undemocratic players Generally, the elections are free and fair. Free and fair elections
48. 4.1.14 Thailand The death penalty has been carried out. Minorities, especially in the South, have been subdued violently. Human rights The judiciary makes or breaks the government and does not seem inpartial in doing so. Lese majeste cases seriously threaten judicial integrity and press freedom. Independence of the courts and checks and balances Corruption is a well-known and widespread phenomenon in Thailand. Corruption There is censorship of Thaksin Shinawatras’ supporters and lese majeste laws limit the freedom of the press. Press freedom The military continues to wield political power. Self-styled supporters of the monarchy often exert undue influence. Absence of undemocratic players Thailand is not an electoral democracy. Constitutional Court rulings in September and December 2008 forced the resignations of two PPP prime ministers and the disbandment of the party itself, leaving a new government led by the rival DP in power at year’s end. Free and fair elections
50. 4.1.15 Vietnam Capital punishment has been carried out in Vietnam. Minorities (e.g. Buddhists and Catholics) have been severely discriminated against and have often been victims of abuse by state officials. Human rights The courts submit to the CPV. Lawyers, who have clients with delicate cases (e.g. human rights issues) are in danger of harassments by the state. Independence of the courts and checks and balances Vietnam could just reach 2.7 points on the 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index. Corruption There is no freedom of the press in Vietnam. For example, the last censorship laws of 2006 prohibit: “denying revolutionary achievements”, spreading “harmful” data or showing ‘reactionary ideology”. Press freedom The CPV (Communist Party of Vietnam) is the only party allowed. Political opponents have been persecuted and convicted because of: “Spreading Anti-Vietnamese Propaganda”. Absence of undemocratic players Vietnam is a communist country, which does not allow free and fair polls. Free and fair elections