Framing the problem
School of education, five different
programs, diverse targets, different
stakeholders, heterogeneous skills,
different levels of expectations
• Vision, mission, strategic objectives have been
defined, common for all
• Operational objectives differ due to skills,
interests, experience
• Levels of communication become barriers
• Deadlines and urgencies block out important
and more trascendent matters, contingency
eats up creativity
Emphatize
• It made me realize I was not the only one frustrated, I
could tell my colleagues were anxious, they felt
excessive pressure, they showed me some things I had
overlooked at and they used this interview to complain
about being overloaded and it was really difficult to
keep it as an interview
• I would say it was a very difficult assignment, not
because I could not emphatize but because it was
really hard to separate ideas from feelings, objective
from subjective, urgent from important and personal
from professional
define
• A structure of work organization that would
suit the university, the school, the directors,
the teachers, the students, the staff
say
• Too many expect too much
• No time for reflection
• Success is never enough
• Things would be easier with more heads and
hands on task
• Interruptions at all times
• Interactions are unfrequent
do
• Open door policy at all times
• Mobile phones open at all times
• Meetings state only starting hours
• Computer screens crowded
• Desks full of papers
• Answer questions while typing
• No written record of agreements
think
• Something has to break the system
• Nothing should change, it is only a matter of
organization
• We are doing as much as we can
• There is no such problem as inefficiency, it is a
problem with expectations
• Everything could improve with better
schedules
feel
• Undervalued on a professional perspective but
valued as persons
• Cared for but also heavily pressed upon
• Enthusiastic about trying new designs
• Willing to try new schemes
• Positive about output

Framing the problem assingment for venture lab

  • 1.
    Framing the problem Schoolof education, five different programs, diverse targets, different stakeholders, heterogeneous skills, different levels of expectations
  • 2.
    • Vision, mission,strategic objectives have been defined, common for all • Operational objectives differ due to skills, interests, experience • Levels of communication become barriers • Deadlines and urgencies block out important and more trascendent matters, contingency eats up creativity
  • 3.
    Emphatize • It mademe realize I was not the only one frustrated, I could tell my colleagues were anxious, they felt excessive pressure, they showed me some things I had overlooked at and they used this interview to complain about being overloaded and it was really difficult to keep it as an interview • I would say it was a very difficult assignment, not because I could not emphatize but because it was really hard to separate ideas from feelings, objective from subjective, urgent from important and personal from professional
  • 4.
    define • A structureof work organization that would suit the university, the school, the directors, the teachers, the students, the staff
  • 5.
    say • Too manyexpect too much • No time for reflection • Success is never enough • Things would be easier with more heads and hands on task • Interruptions at all times • Interactions are unfrequent
  • 6.
    do • Open doorpolicy at all times • Mobile phones open at all times • Meetings state only starting hours • Computer screens crowded • Desks full of papers • Answer questions while typing • No written record of agreements
  • 7.
    think • Something hasto break the system • Nothing should change, it is only a matter of organization • We are doing as much as we can • There is no such problem as inefficiency, it is a problem with expectations • Everything could improve with better schedules
  • 8.
    feel • Undervalued ona professional perspective but valued as persons • Cared for but also heavily pressed upon • Enthusiastic about trying new designs • Willing to try new schemes • Positive about output