SlideShare a Scribd company logo
FORD’S NEW
BUSINESS UNIT
Caterina HAUTH * Fuad KARIMOV * Peter
CHAMOUN * Souhila HADDAD
Mergers & Acquisitions
IUSE Madrid Business School
AGENDA
 Electric car industry overview and analysis
 Ford company
 Potential targets
 Fisker
 Tesla
 Wheego
 Tango
 Implementation strategy
Market Overview: Electric Cars
 US demand for electric motors is expected to
increase 4.5 percent annually until 2017
reaching $14.3 billion
 Product sales will climb 2.3 percent per year to
1.4 billion in 2017
 Electric motors are a key components in many
durable goods
 If manufacturing output rises, sales of electric
cars are expected to follow
SWOT Analysis of the industry
Strengths
• Low Fuel consumption
• Low CO2 Emissions
• Much cheaper running costs
• Green image
• Fun to drive (high torque, low
noise)
Weaknesses
• Higher production cost and retail
price than normal cars
• Maintenance expenses are
higher
• Battery replacement is expensive
• Low autonomy (between 100 and
300 km)
• Long time to charge
Opportunities
• Governmental incentive
• Rising fuel prices
• Legal regulations for low emissions
• Many (public and private ) investors
Threats
• Skepticism from some conservative
sectors
• Goes against the interests of oil
industry
• Cost reduction in traditional cars’
production
Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
 Threat of new entrants: Medium
 Government incentives result in an increase of
the industry margins
 Manufacturers of traditional cars may be moving
towards the electric car market
 “Going Green” image is good publicity
 High initial capital requirements
 Hard to get network of distribution channels
Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
 Bargaining power of customers: Low
 Not as many options as in the traditional car
industry
 Consumers have a larger knowledge of
alternative vehicles due to governmental
promotion
 Subsidies offered to purchase these vehicles
 Private consumers are to a large extent very
responsive to prices
Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
 Bargaining power of suppliers: Medium
 Automobile manufacturers face low switching cost
 They also control terms of supply and price
 However, they are more than ever dependent on
the suppliers industries
 Development and production stages of batteries
are an entirely new field for most manufacturers
Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
 Threat of substitute products: Medium
 Buyers are still reluctant to spend more money in
an electric car than a regular one
 Switching back to a regular car has a low initial
price, but incurs in higher running costs
 The tendency, however, is that the market share
of electric cars is growing
 Public transportation and other means of
transport cannot match the comfort offered by a
car  do not pose a serious threat
Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
 Intensity of competitive rivalry: High
 Many manufacturers of traditional cars will start a
line of electric cars to get a share of the growing
market
 Competition is centered in technology and
innovation
 In order to get access to technological know-how,
vertical integration, joint ventures and strategic
alliances are increasing.
Ford Motor Company
 American multinational car manufacturer
 Founded in 1903 and established worldwide
 Sells automobiles and commercial vehicles under
the Ford brand
 Sells luxury cars under the Lincoln brand
 Target middle class people
 Revenue of US$ 136.26 billion in 2011
 Introduced a sustainable energy strategy in 2011
 They don’t have the expertise or the technology to
start producing electric cars
 Ford wants to study the possibility of acquiring or
starting a joint venture with one electric car firm
The Targets
Fisker automotive: overview
 American company
 founded in 2007 by Hendrik Fisker and
Bernhard Koehler
 Mission: producing the world's first premium
hybrid electric vehicle
 Revenue of 2012 was around 200 Million USD
(about 2000 cars sold), starting price
100.000+USD
External Analysis
 Target: people with high economic position, high
class people (celebrities and rich people) males
and females from 25-60 years old
 Customers mostly from the USA (45 dealerships)
and Canada (3 dealerships)
 Hope to reach customers in China, England and
continental Europe
External Analysis
 Suppliers: GP Supercars
(Merano, Italy), Nellemann
(Copenhagen, Denmark); the Emil Frey Group
(Zurich, Switzerland); BD Otomotive
(Istanbul, Turkey) and Al-Futtaim Group (Middle
East and North Africa)
 Investors: Fisker Automotive's investors include
Leonardo DiCaprio, Palo Alto Investors, Kleiner
Perkins Caufield & Byers, Qatar
Strategy
 Fisker is a niche brand which is focused on
using sustainable products to reach people
who are interested in environmentally friendly
cars
 Not a “mass” producer
 Fisker should make an alliance with another
electric motors company to be able to lower
their costs and cover a lower market segment
 If Fisker continues like this, they will not
survive very long because their total sale
volume is very low
Wheego: overview
• Small, 2 years old, Atlanta company
• Builds entirely electric cars
• Manufactured in Southern California
• Launched 1st car: April 22, 2011 (Wheego
LiFe)
• 160 km per charge
• MSRP: $32,995
• 25+ Dealerships across the United States
External analysis
 Target: Wheego targets lower-middle class
 They have managed to significantly reduce the
production costs and make their cars actually
affordable.
 Investors:
 Mike McQuary, CEO
 Suppliers:
 Flux Power for Lithium batteries
 Electric drivetrain produced and installed in
California
Strategy
 Wheego targets middle-class buyers
 They offer safe and reliable electric cars at
affordable prices
 Collaboration with other companies can be
beneficial and viewed as positive for both
parties
Tesla: overview
 Publicly traded company founded in 2003
 Founded by Elon Musk, Marc Tarpenning and
Martin Eberhard
 Produces a high-performance electric sports
car
 Backed by a number of high-profile investors
 Price of a car is around 100.000 USD
 Revenue: 413.3 Million USD
External Analysis
 Target: people looking for electric premium
and sports, luxury cars
 Rich and Affluent who are willing to spend
more
 Environmentally conscious customers
External Analysis
 Suppliers: positive and high quality
procurement process from Tesla through
multiple suppliers
 Car parts produced in France
 Powertrain built in California
 Battery cells from Japan
Strategy
 Looking to lower prices for different suppliers to
ensure savings overtime if prices were to be
raised
 Focus niche market (rich and affluent)
 Tesla tackles regions with higher gas prices, like
California, Hawaii, Alaska and New York
 Tesla Motor can merge with Toyota because they
already supply the company with control systems,
batteries, and motor for the new Rav4
 If Tesla did not succeed as an independent
automobile manufacturer, it will still have the
ability to produce the proper technologies for the
big car manufacturers
Commuter Cars: overview
 Founded by Bryan and Rick Woodbury
 Based in Spokane, Washington
 Produces ultra-narrow electric cars
 The first car produced was sold to George
Clooney in 2005
 Their flagship car, coined Tango, is sold for
108.000USD
 It’s delivered almost finished, but the buyer has to
finish assembling it (8 hours work)
 Annual revenue: 1.5 Million USD
External Analysis
 Target:
 Middle Class comprising (income group
10,000-20000 USD)
 Long term goal is to get the price to 10.000
USD
 For now, only rich people can afford the car
Strategy
 Commuter cars uses the differentiation market
strategy
 Security: Tango cars have a narrow body and
quick maneuverability, it can avoid trouble better
than any other car in existence
 Driving experience: Tango accelerates from 0-60
mph in 3.2 seconds, has finished the standing 1/4
mile in 12.255 seconds at 106.86 mph, and can
reach over 150 mph with no gear shifting
Implementation strategy
Which company is the right
choice?
TESLA
 Option 1: Starting a Joint-Venture with Tesla
 Reasons:
 Ford needs an expert in the electric motors section
and Tesla has the most experience in the electric
motors sector
 The high global distribution of Ford together with the
expertise of Tesla would make a perfect match
 Ford does not want to switch completely to the electric
motors section. However, they want to target a
growing market
 Tesla current holds the biggest market share in the
electric car market
WHEEGO
 Option 2: Ford acquires Wheego Electric
Cars
 Reasons:
 Wheego has already managed to lower
production costs of their cars enough to target
middle class, the segment aimed at by Ford
 Together with the Global distribution channels of
Ford, these cars could be commercialized all over
the world at a reasonable price
 Wheego seems to be affordable for Ford
THANK YOU FOR YOUR
ATTENTION!
Contact Information:
IUSE Madrid Business School
Course: Mergers&Acquisitions
Professor: Mr. Hubert Joo
E-Mail: hubert.joo@faculty.uibs.org

More Related Content

What's hot

Tesla final ,,
Tesla final ,,Tesla final ,,
Tesla final ,,
美丽 陈
 
tesla case study
tesla case studytesla case study
tesla case studyRobert Korn
 
Case Study: Tesla Motors
Case Study: Tesla MotorsCase Study: Tesla Motors
Case Study: Tesla Motors
Hamza Mahmood
 
Tesla motors project
Tesla motors projectTesla motors project
Tesla motors project
Carl Bruinsma
 
Business analysis of Tesla.INC
Business analysis of Tesla.INCBusiness analysis of Tesla.INC
Business analysis of Tesla.INC
ManishaHalai1
 
Tesla marketing plan in china - by Janet TANG
Tesla marketing plan in china - by Janet TANGTesla marketing plan in china - by Janet TANG
Tesla marketing plan in china - by Janet TANG
Jie TANG
 
Tesla Marketing plan - part 1
Tesla Marketing plan - part 1Tesla Marketing plan - part 1
Tesla Marketing plan - part 1Danilo Valentino
 
Tesla Final Project 2014
Tesla Final Project 2014Tesla Final Project 2014
Tesla Final Project 2014Olivia James
 
Tesla strategic management final
Tesla strategic management finalTesla strategic management final
Tesla strategic management final
Nadine Khattab
 
Strategic Management Final
Strategic Management FinalStrategic Management Final
Strategic Management FinalIan Clark
 
Tesla marketing plan - part 2
Tesla marketing plan - part 2Tesla marketing plan - part 2
Tesla marketing plan - part 2Danilo Valentino
 
TalentWeek™ Presentation - Tesla - Louis Efron and Juliana Bednarski
TalentWeek™ Presentation - Tesla - Louis Efron and Juliana BednarskiTalentWeek™ Presentation - Tesla - Louis Efron and Juliana Bednarski
TalentWeek™ Presentation - Tesla - Louis Efron and Juliana Bednarski
Qualtrics
 
Tesla motors version
Tesla motors versionTesla motors version
Tesla motors version
Ashish Saxena
 
Suggestions Tesla in China
Suggestions Tesla in ChinaSuggestions Tesla in China
Tesla Motors
Tesla MotorsTesla Motors
Tesla Motors
Jourdan Bousfield
 
Tesla Motors’ Strategy to Revolutionize the Global Automotive Industry
Tesla Motors’ Strategy to Revolutionize the Global Automotive IndustryTesla Motors’ Strategy to Revolutionize the Global Automotive Industry
Tesla Motors’ Strategy to Revolutionize the Global Automotive Industry
Tran Thang
 
Tesla Strategy
Tesla StrategyTesla Strategy
Tesla Strategy
Joe Baker
 

What's hot (20)

Tesla final ,,
Tesla final ,,Tesla final ,,
Tesla final ,,
 
tesla case study
tesla case studytesla case study
tesla case study
 
Tesla PPT
Tesla PPTTesla PPT
Tesla PPT
 
Case Study: Tesla Motors
Case Study: Tesla MotorsCase Study: Tesla Motors
Case Study: Tesla Motors
 
Tesla motors project
Tesla motors projectTesla motors project
Tesla motors project
 
TESLA FINAL REPORT
TESLA FINAL REPORTTESLA FINAL REPORT
TESLA FINAL REPORT
 
Business analysis of Tesla.INC
Business analysis of Tesla.INCBusiness analysis of Tesla.INC
Business analysis of Tesla.INC
 
Tesla marketing plan in china - by Janet TANG
Tesla marketing plan in china - by Janet TANGTesla marketing plan in china - by Janet TANG
Tesla marketing plan in china - by Janet TANG
 
Tesla Marketing plan - part 1
Tesla Marketing plan - part 1Tesla Marketing plan - part 1
Tesla Marketing plan - part 1
 
Tesla Final Draft
Tesla Final DraftTesla Final Draft
Tesla Final Draft
 
Tesla Final Project 2014
Tesla Final Project 2014Tesla Final Project 2014
Tesla Final Project 2014
 
Tesla strategic management final
Tesla strategic management finalTesla strategic management final
Tesla strategic management final
 
Strategic Management Final
Strategic Management FinalStrategic Management Final
Strategic Management Final
 
Tesla marketing plan - part 2
Tesla marketing plan - part 2Tesla marketing plan - part 2
Tesla marketing plan - part 2
 
TalentWeek™ Presentation - Tesla - Louis Efron and Juliana Bednarski
TalentWeek™ Presentation - Tesla - Louis Efron and Juliana BednarskiTalentWeek™ Presentation - Tesla - Louis Efron and Juliana Bednarski
TalentWeek™ Presentation - Tesla - Louis Efron and Juliana Bednarski
 
Tesla motors version
Tesla motors versionTesla motors version
Tesla motors version
 
Suggestions Tesla in China
Suggestions Tesla in ChinaSuggestions Tesla in China
Suggestions Tesla in China
 
Tesla Motors
Tesla MotorsTesla Motors
Tesla Motors
 
Tesla Motors’ Strategy to Revolutionize the Global Automotive Industry
Tesla Motors’ Strategy to Revolutionize the Global Automotive IndustryTesla Motors’ Strategy to Revolutionize the Global Automotive Industry
Tesla Motors’ Strategy to Revolutionize the Global Automotive Industry
 
Tesla Strategy
Tesla StrategyTesla Strategy
Tesla Strategy
 

Similar to FORD’s New Business Unit

Darden School of Business Tesla Strategic Analysis
Darden School of Business   Tesla Strategic AnalysisDarden School of Business   Tesla Strategic Analysis
Darden School of Business Tesla Strategic Analysis
José Ángel Álvarez Fuente
 
Hec final
Hec finalHec final
Group6-GM Consulting Presentation-Final
Group6-GM Consulting Presentation-FinalGroup6-GM Consulting Presentation-Final
Group6-GM Consulting Presentation-FinalBishwa Pandey
 
Tesla Presentation - FINAL (2)
Tesla Presentation - FINAL (2)Tesla Presentation - FINAL (2)
Tesla Presentation - FINAL (2)Jon Farchmin
 
Why efficient Procurement and Production processes are essential.
Why efficient Procurement and Production processes are essential.Why efficient Procurement and Production processes are essential.
Why efficient Procurement and Production processes are essential.
Wayne Harper
 
Fiat Group Final Version
Fiat Group Final VersionFiat Group Final Version
Fiat Group Final Version
espo180
 
Smart Car Frombegin
Smart Car FrombeginSmart Car Frombegin
Smart Car FrombeginSean Yeh
 
Capgemini ses - electric vehicles pov (gr)
Capgemini   ses - electric vehicles pov (gr)Capgemini   ses - electric vehicles pov (gr)
Capgemini ses - electric vehicles pov (gr)
Gord Reynolds
 
TESLA FINAL PRESENTATION
TESLA FINAL PRESENTATIONTESLA FINAL PRESENTATION
TESLA FINAL PRESENTATIONSindy Wang Pan
 
Automobile industry
Automobile industryAutomobile industry
Automobile industry
Riya Aseef
 
Renault ZOE marketing plan
Renault  ZOE marketing planRenault  ZOE marketing plan
Renault ZOE marketing plan
Maged Makar Morcos
 
Better Place final Presentation
Better Place final PresentationBetter Place final Presentation
Better Place final PresentationAnirudh Maheshwari
 
Tesla Motors
Tesla MotorsTesla Motors
Tesla Motors
Burcu Durmuşoğlu
 
analysis_of_toyota.pdf
analysis_of_toyota.pdfanalysis_of_toyota.pdf
analysis_of_toyota.pdf
ganesh549391
 
analysis_of_toyota 2013.pdf
analysis_of_toyota 2013.pdfanalysis_of_toyota 2013.pdf
analysis_of_toyota 2013.pdf
KomalYousaf4
 

Similar to FORD’s New Business Unit (20)

Darden School of Business Tesla Strategic Analysis
Darden School of Business   Tesla Strategic AnalysisDarden School of Business   Tesla Strategic Analysis
Darden School of Business Tesla Strategic Analysis
 
Hec final
Hec finalHec final
Hec final
 
Group6-GM Consulting Presentation-Final
Group6-GM Consulting Presentation-FinalGroup6-GM Consulting Presentation-Final
Group6-GM Consulting Presentation-Final
 
Tesla Presentation - FINAL (2)
Tesla Presentation - FINAL (2)Tesla Presentation - FINAL (2)
Tesla Presentation - FINAL (2)
 
Toyota
Toyota Toyota
Toyota
 
Why efficient Procurement and Production processes are essential.
Why efficient Procurement and Production processes are essential.Why efficient Procurement and Production processes are essential.
Why efficient Procurement and Production processes are essential.
 
Fiat Group Final Version
Fiat Group Final VersionFiat Group Final Version
Fiat Group Final Version
 
Smart Car Frombegin
Smart Car FrombeginSmart Car Frombegin
Smart Car Frombegin
 
Capgemini ses - electric vehicles pov (gr)
Capgemini   ses - electric vehicles pov (gr)Capgemini   ses - electric vehicles pov (gr)
Capgemini ses - electric vehicles pov (gr)
 
project
projectproject
project
 
Tesla final
Tesla finalTesla final
Tesla final
 
Honda lumiere
Honda lumiereHonda lumiere
Honda lumiere
 
TESLA FINAL PRESENTATION
TESLA FINAL PRESENTATIONTESLA FINAL PRESENTATION
TESLA FINAL PRESENTATION
 
Automobile industry
Automobile industryAutomobile industry
Automobile industry
 
Renault ZOE marketing plan
Renault  ZOE marketing planRenault  ZOE marketing plan
Renault ZOE marketing plan
 
Better Place final Presentation
Better Place final PresentationBetter Place final Presentation
Better Place final Presentation
 
Tesla Motors
Tesla MotorsTesla Motors
Tesla Motors
 
analysis_of_toyota.pdf
analysis_of_toyota.pdfanalysis_of_toyota.pdf
analysis_of_toyota.pdf
 
analysis_of_toyota 2013.pdf
analysis_of_toyota 2013.pdfanalysis_of_toyota 2013.pdf
analysis_of_toyota 2013.pdf
 
General motors
General motorsGeneral motors
General motors
 

More from Merjerz

yhoo valuation
yhoo valuationyhoo valuation
yhoo valuationMerjerz
 
Apple - Yahoo M
Apple - Yahoo MApple - Yahoo M
Apple - Yahoo MMerjerz
 
Evaluation of both companies
Evaluation of both companiesEvaluation of both companies
Evaluation of both companiesMerjerz
 
Evaluation of both companies
Evaluation of both companiesEvaluation of both companies
Evaluation of both companiesMerjerz
 
Google: Orbitz or Tripadvisor ?
Google: Orbitz or Tripadvisor ?Google: Orbitz or Tripadvisor ?
Google: Orbitz or Tripadvisor ?Merjerz
 
Harvard Extension M
Harvard Extension MHarvard Extension M
Harvard Extension MMerjerz
 
new slide goes here
new slide goes herenew slide goes here
new slide goes hereMerjerz
 
the grate slidshare of my
the grate slidshare of mythe grate slidshare of my
the grate slidshare of myMerjerz
 
Outbrain-Taboola
Outbrain-TaboolaOutbrain-Taboola
Outbrain-TaboolaMerjerz
 
Professor Tong Yu's slides
Professor Tong Yu's slidesProfessor Tong Yu's slides
Professor Tong Yu's slidesMerjerz
 

More from Merjerz (20)

yhoo valuation
yhoo valuationyhoo valuation
yhoo valuation
 
Apple - Yahoo M
Apple - Yahoo MApple - Yahoo M
Apple - Yahoo M
 
Evaluation of both companies
Evaluation of both companiesEvaluation of both companies
Evaluation of both companies
 
Evaluation of both companies
Evaluation of both companiesEvaluation of both companies
Evaluation of both companies
 
Google: Orbitz or Tripadvisor ?
Google: Orbitz or Tripadvisor ?Google: Orbitz or Tripadvisor ?
Google: Orbitz or Tripadvisor ?
 
M
MM
M
 
M
MM
M
 
Harvard Extension M
Harvard Extension MHarvard Extension M
Harvard Extension M
 
new slide goes here
new slide goes herenew slide goes here
new slide goes here
 
the grate slidshare of my
the grate slidshare of mythe grate slidshare of my
the grate slidshare of my
 
test
testtest
test
 
test
test test
test
 
test
test test
test
 
test
testtest
test
 
test
testtest
test
 
test
test test
test
 
Outbrain-Taboola
Outbrain-TaboolaOutbrain-Taboola
Outbrain-Taboola
 
Professor Tong Yu's slides
Professor Tong Yu's slidesProfessor Tong Yu's slides
Professor Tong Yu's slides
 
sss
ssssss
sss
 
aaa
aaaaaa
aaa
 

FORD’s New Business Unit

  • 1. FORD’S NEW BUSINESS UNIT Caterina HAUTH * Fuad KARIMOV * Peter CHAMOUN * Souhila HADDAD Mergers & Acquisitions IUSE Madrid Business School
  • 2. AGENDA  Electric car industry overview and analysis  Ford company  Potential targets  Fisker  Tesla  Wheego  Tango  Implementation strategy
  • 3. Market Overview: Electric Cars  US demand for electric motors is expected to increase 4.5 percent annually until 2017 reaching $14.3 billion  Product sales will climb 2.3 percent per year to 1.4 billion in 2017  Electric motors are a key components in many durable goods  If manufacturing output rises, sales of electric cars are expected to follow
  • 4. SWOT Analysis of the industry Strengths • Low Fuel consumption • Low CO2 Emissions • Much cheaper running costs • Green image • Fun to drive (high torque, low noise) Weaknesses • Higher production cost and retail price than normal cars • Maintenance expenses are higher • Battery replacement is expensive • Low autonomy (between 100 and 300 km) • Long time to charge Opportunities • Governmental incentive • Rising fuel prices • Legal regulations for low emissions • Many (public and private ) investors Threats • Skepticism from some conservative sectors • Goes against the interests of oil industry • Cost reduction in traditional cars’ production
  • 5. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis  Threat of new entrants: Medium  Government incentives result in an increase of the industry margins  Manufacturers of traditional cars may be moving towards the electric car market  “Going Green” image is good publicity  High initial capital requirements  Hard to get network of distribution channels
  • 6. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis  Bargaining power of customers: Low  Not as many options as in the traditional car industry  Consumers have a larger knowledge of alternative vehicles due to governmental promotion  Subsidies offered to purchase these vehicles  Private consumers are to a large extent very responsive to prices
  • 7. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis  Bargaining power of suppliers: Medium  Automobile manufacturers face low switching cost  They also control terms of supply and price  However, they are more than ever dependent on the suppliers industries  Development and production stages of batteries are an entirely new field for most manufacturers
  • 8. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis  Threat of substitute products: Medium  Buyers are still reluctant to spend more money in an electric car than a regular one  Switching back to a regular car has a low initial price, but incurs in higher running costs  The tendency, however, is that the market share of electric cars is growing  Public transportation and other means of transport cannot match the comfort offered by a car  do not pose a serious threat
  • 9. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis  Intensity of competitive rivalry: High  Many manufacturers of traditional cars will start a line of electric cars to get a share of the growing market  Competition is centered in technology and innovation  In order to get access to technological know-how, vertical integration, joint ventures and strategic alliances are increasing.
  • 10. Ford Motor Company  American multinational car manufacturer  Founded in 1903 and established worldwide  Sells automobiles and commercial vehicles under the Ford brand  Sells luxury cars under the Lincoln brand  Target middle class people  Revenue of US$ 136.26 billion in 2011  Introduced a sustainable energy strategy in 2011  They don’t have the expertise or the technology to start producing electric cars  Ford wants to study the possibility of acquiring or starting a joint venture with one electric car firm
  • 12. Fisker automotive: overview  American company  founded in 2007 by Hendrik Fisker and Bernhard Koehler  Mission: producing the world's first premium hybrid electric vehicle  Revenue of 2012 was around 200 Million USD (about 2000 cars sold), starting price 100.000+USD
  • 13. External Analysis  Target: people with high economic position, high class people (celebrities and rich people) males and females from 25-60 years old  Customers mostly from the USA (45 dealerships) and Canada (3 dealerships)  Hope to reach customers in China, England and continental Europe
  • 14. External Analysis  Suppliers: GP Supercars (Merano, Italy), Nellemann (Copenhagen, Denmark); the Emil Frey Group (Zurich, Switzerland); BD Otomotive (Istanbul, Turkey) and Al-Futtaim Group (Middle East and North Africa)  Investors: Fisker Automotive's investors include Leonardo DiCaprio, Palo Alto Investors, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Qatar
  • 15. Strategy  Fisker is a niche brand which is focused on using sustainable products to reach people who are interested in environmentally friendly cars  Not a “mass” producer  Fisker should make an alliance with another electric motors company to be able to lower their costs and cover a lower market segment  If Fisker continues like this, they will not survive very long because their total sale volume is very low
  • 16. Wheego: overview • Small, 2 years old, Atlanta company • Builds entirely electric cars • Manufactured in Southern California • Launched 1st car: April 22, 2011 (Wheego LiFe) • 160 km per charge • MSRP: $32,995 • 25+ Dealerships across the United States
  • 17. External analysis  Target: Wheego targets lower-middle class  They have managed to significantly reduce the production costs and make their cars actually affordable.  Investors:  Mike McQuary, CEO  Suppliers:  Flux Power for Lithium batteries  Electric drivetrain produced and installed in California
  • 18. Strategy  Wheego targets middle-class buyers  They offer safe and reliable electric cars at affordable prices  Collaboration with other companies can be beneficial and viewed as positive for both parties
  • 19. Tesla: overview  Publicly traded company founded in 2003  Founded by Elon Musk, Marc Tarpenning and Martin Eberhard  Produces a high-performance electric sports car  Backed by a number of high-profile investors  Price of a car is around 100.000 USD  Revenue: 413.3 Million USD
  • 20. External Analysis  Target: people looking for electric premium and sports, luxury cars  Rich and Affluent who are willing to spend more  Environmentally conscious customers
  • 21. External Analysis  Suppliers: positive and high quality procurement process from Tesla through multiple suppliers  Car parts produced in France  Powertrain built in California  Battery cells from Japan
  • 22. Strategy  Looking to lower prices for different suppliers to ensure savings overtime if prices were to be raised  Focus niche market (rich and affluent)  Tesla tackles regions with higher gas prices, like California, Hawaii, Alaska and New York  Tesla Motor can merge with Toyota because they already supply the company with control systems, batteries, and motor for the new Rav4  If Tesla did not succeed as an independent automobile manufacturer, it will still have the ability to produce the proper technologies for the big car manufacturers
  • 23. Commuter Cars: overview  Founded by Bryan and Rick Woodbury  Based in Spokane, Washington  Produces ultra-narrow electric cars  The first car produced was sold to George Clooney in 2005  Their flagship car, coined Tango, is sold for 108.000USD  It’s delivered almost finished, but the buyer has to finish assembling it (8 hours work)  Annual revenue: 1.5 Million USD
  • 24. External Analysis  Target:  Middle Class comprising (income group 10,000-20000 USD)  Long term goal is to get the price to 10.000 USD  For now, only rich people can afford the car
  • 25. Strategy  Commuter cars uses the differentiation market strategy  Security: Tango cars have a narrow body and quick maneuverability, it can avoid trouble better than any other car in existence  Driving experience: Tango accelerates from 0-60 mph in 3.2 seconds, has finished the standing 1/4 mile in 12.255 seconds at 106.86 mph, and can reach over 150 mph with no gear shifting
  • 27. TESLA  Option 1: Starting a Joint-Venture with Tesla  Reasons:  Ford needs an expert in the electric motors section and Tesla has the most experience in the electric motors sector  The high global distribution of Ford together with the expertise of Tesla would make a perfect match  Ford does not want to switch completely to the electric motors section. However, they want to target a growing market  Tesla current holds the biggest market share in the electric car market
  • 28. WHEEGO  Option 2: Ford acquires Wheego Electric Cars  Reasons:  Wheego has already managed to lower production costs of their cars enough to target middle class, the segment aimed at by Ford  Together with the Global distribution channels of Ford, these cars could be commercialized all over the world at a reasonable price  Wheego seems to be affordable for Ford
  • 29. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! Contact Information: IUSE Madrid Business School Course: Mergers&Acquisitions Professor: Mr. Hubert Joo E-Mail: hubert.joo@faculty.uibs.org