The contents page received similar feedback to the front cover, with many articles making the magazine worth the price. The sections and fonts were well organized and carried over from the front cover, although there was more red used. While the background worked well and looked good, the images could be improved by using more interesting locations and including people rather than objects in one picture. The articles could also be spaced out better and made more colorful to be easier to read.

1. During the same session as the front cover
focus group we looked at my contents page
and got similar feedback.
There are a lot of articles which make it worth
the price.
It’s well sectioned and put well into the two
larger sections (Featured/Regulars)
The fonts and colours were carried from the
front cover, however there is a lot of red on the
contents page compared to the front cover
which had very little.
The background works well with the page and
generally looks good, however it does blend in
with the pictures and the background of them.
The background of the images is very boring
and could look better if they were in more
interesting locations.
The top picture is very boring and would be
more interesting with another person instead of
two inanimate objects.
The articles could be more spaced out as it is a
little hard to read and could be more colourful.
I would be better if the musician was wearing
something else compared to the front cover so
it doesn’t look like the same image.
This page could do with more images overall to
make it look like there is more in the magazine
and make this page look better overall.