This document outlines the design, material testing, and construction of a composite chassis for Edith Cowan University's 2010 Formula SAE race car. Key points:
- An extensive material testing program was conducted to determine the optimal composite panel configuration for strength, stiffness, and safety.
- Various core thicknesses, skin materials, and fiber orientations were tested to evaluate their effects on the panel properties.
- The final design utilized a "cut and fold" construction with carbon fiber-skinned aluminum honeycomb panels, which provided high strength and stiffness relative to weight.
- The report details the panel testing process, attachment point design, and construction of the composite monocoque chassis.
The document describes the different layouts of automobiles, including where the engine and drive wheels are located. It discusses the main types - front engine rear wheel drive, rear engine rear wheel drive, and front engine front wheel drive. For each type, it provides details on their characteristics such as noise isolation, drive train loss, weight distribution, and handling. The document aims to explain the different configurations and their respective advantages and limitations.
This document discusses four-wheel drive (4WD) vehicles. It describes the main advantages as improved traction and handling from being able to transmit torque to all four wheels. The disadvantages include higher initial costs and weight as well as requiring special service and maintenance. The document defines different 4WD systems such as part-time 4WD which operates in two-wheel drive normally but can engage 4WD, full-time 4WD which constantly powers all four wheels, and on-demand 4WD which automatically engages the front wheels when slip is detected. It provides details on 4WD components, transfer cases, differentials, and maintenance tips.
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF KINETIC ENERGY RECOVERY SYSTEM (KERS) IN BICYCLE IAEME Publication
Kinetic energy recovery system (KERS) is a technology used in formula-1 cars for recovering the energy lost in braking of the car and thus providing boost to the vehicle motion. Same
concept i.e. regenerative braking can be applied in bicycle which uses a flywheel which will be mounted between the frames of the bicycle, the flywheel can store the braking energy by rotating and this energy can be given back to the system which will reduce the pedaling power required to drive
the bicycle.
automobile workshop ppt Traning report by c rang rajan and sudhir kumarchakrawarti rang rajan
The document provides an overview of the key components and systems of an automobile. It begins with an introduction to Karlo Automobiles, an Indian vehicle repair workshop. It then defines an automobile and describes its main parts like the engine, transmission system including the clutch, gearbox, propeller shaft, differential, wheels, axle and chassis. The document further explains the body, suspension system, cooling system, steering system, braking system and lighting system of a car. Diagrams and pictures are included to illustrate the different components. The presentation aims to provide trainees an understanding of the various parts that make up a motor vehicle.
This document provides an introduction to vehicle dynamics and its key concepts. It discusses topics such as ride and handling, suspension systems, forces acting on vehicles, vehicle motion including pitch, roll and yaw, and power characteristics. Vehicle dynamics is the study of how vehicles react to driver inputs based on mechanics. Key aspects covered include body flex, weight transfer during braking, types of steering like understeer and oversteer, suspension design impacts on ride quality, and engine power outputs. The document provides a high-level overview of fundamental vehicle dynamics principles.
The document discusses braking systems for motorsports vehicles. It covers the main requirements for braking systems including controlled deceleration in various conditions. The key components of braking systems are described including the energy source, modulation system, transmission system, and friction components. Drum brakes and disc brakes are the main types discussed. Factors affecting braking efficiency and design considerations for motorsports braking systems are also summarized.
The document outlines the process and considerations for vehicle occupant packaging and ergonomic evaluations. It begins with establishing assumptions about the vehicle type and intended users. Exterior dimensions, seating position, controls layout, and visibility are then evaluated in detail. Tests are conducted to evaluate entry/exit, comfort, reach, visibility and more. The goal is to apply ergonomic principles to optimize the design for human use and performance.
The document describes the different layouts of automobiles, including where the engine and drive wheels are located. It discusses the main types - front engine rear wheel drive, rear engine rear wheel drive, and front engine front wheel drive. For each type, it provides details on their characteristics such as noise isolation, drive train loss, weight distribution, and handling. The document aims to explain the different configurations and their respective advantages and limitations.
This document discusses four-wheel drive (4WD) vehicles. It describes the main advantages as improved traction and handling from being able to transmit torque to all four wheels. The disadvantages include higher initial costs and weight as well as requiring special service and maintenance. The document defines different 4WD systems such as part-time 4WD which operates in two-wheel drive normally but can engage 4WD, full-time 4WD which constantly powers all four wheels, and on-demand 4WD which automatically engages the front wheels when slip is detected. It provides details on 4WD components, transfer cases, differentials, and maintenance tips.
DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF KINETIC ENERGY RECOVERY SYSTEM (KERS) IN BICYCLE IAEME Publication
Kinetic energy recovery system (KERS) is a technology used in formula-1 cars for recovering the energy lost in braking of the car and thus providing boost to the vehicle motion. Same
concept i.e. regenerative braking can be applied in bicycle which uses a flywheel which will be mounted between the frames of the bicycle, the flywheel can store the braking energy by rotating and this energy can be given back to the system which will reduce the pedaling power required to drive
the bicycle.
automobile workshop ppt Traning report by c rang rajan and sudhir kumarchakrawarti rang rajan
The document provides an overview of the key components and systems of an automobile. It begins with an introduction to Karlo Automobiles, an Indian vehicle repair workshop. It then defines an automobile and describes its main parts like the engine, transmission system including the clutch, gearbox, propeller shaft, differential, wheels, axle and chassis. The document further explains the body, suspension system, cooling system, steering system, braking system and lighting system of a car. Diagrams and pictures are included to illustrate the different components. The presentation aims to provide trainees an understanding of the various parts that make up a motor vehicle.
This document provides an introduction to vehicle dynamics and its key concepts. It discusses topics such as ride and handling, suspension systems, forces acting on vehicles, vehicle motion including pitch, roll and yaw, and power characteristics. Vehicle dynamics is the study of how vehicles react to driver inputs based on mechanics. Key aspects covered include body flex, weight transfer during braking, types of steering like understeer and oversteer, suspension design impacts on ride quality, and engine power outputs. The document provides a high-level overview of fundamental vehicle dynamics principles.
The document discusses braking systems for motorsports vehicles. It covers the main requirements for braking systems including controlled deceleration in various conditions. The key components of braking systems are described including the energy source, modulation system, transmission system, and friction components. Drum brakes and disc brakes are the main types discussed. Factors affecting braking efficiency and design considerations for motorsports braking systems are also summarized.
The document outlines the process and considerations for vehicle occupant packaging and ergonomic evaluations. It begins with establishing assumptions about the vehicle type and intended users. Exterior dimensions, seating position, controls layout, and visibility are then evaluated in detail. Tests are conducted to evaluate entry/exit, comfort, reach, visibility and more. The goal is to apply ergonomic principles to optimize the design for human use and performance.
This document discusses the fabrication of composite leaf springs for vehicle suspension systems. It aims to reduce vehicle weight through the use of composite materials like glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) instead of conventional steel springs. The document outlines the manufacturing process of composite leaf springs using hand lay-up techniques with GFRP and epoxy. It also summarizes the advantages of composite leaf springs like reduced weight and corrosion resistance compared to steel, though their production cost is currently higher. Experimental testing showed composite leaf springs have lower deflection and bending stress than steel springs under the same loads.
This document discusses vehicle handling and summarizes key concepts related to steady state and transient handling behavior. It covers topics such as Ackerman steering geometry, low and high speed cornering, tire cornering stiffness, understeer and oversteer characteristics, and factors that influence steady state response including weight distribution and tire properties. Metrics for evaluating vehicle response like understeer gradient, characteristic speed, and static margin are also introduced.
This document contains a thermodynamics lab report submitted by a mechanical engineering student. The report summarizes 11 experiments conducted in the thermodynamics lab, including demonstrations of internal combustion engine components and systems, different engine types, and measurements. It also includes detailed descriptions of 3 specific experiments on introducing the lab and layout, demonstrating main engine components, and demonstrating 2-stroke and 4-stroke engines.
Mercedes benz service centre training reportPanchal Anand
Industrial training (Internship) Report.
Mercedes_benz Service centre.
Abstract: As a Mechanical Engineering Student I am very interested in automobile Engineering. I always keen to learn different mechanisms used in vehicles, I used to watch animated videos on YouTube about automobile mechanisms like Differential, Automatic transmission gearbox etc, but I never watched it in real. So, it was a great opportunity for me to do two weeks internship at Mercedes-benz Service centre, Ambli, Ahmedabad. The internship was concentrated on the car services. At the beginning of the internship I had several queries in my mind regarding the different technologies used in Mercedes-benz and what skills are needed in organization. During my internship several queries are cleared by doing some activities. The objective of this internship is to understand working of different mechanisms, to get knowledge of regular services and the major-minor problem that can be observed in day to day life. Apart from technical knowledge, I also learnt rules and safety instruction, Inventory management, Quality Control. I realize the responsibility of technicians working on the car. So, this internship was a great experience. I found out how much I am strong in automobile field. I gained new knowledge and skills and met many new people. Working together with people having different background and education was great experience. I also accompanied by other 2-3 students who were also on industrial training, so it was nice knowledge sharing. I achieved many of my learning goals. I got insight into the work of an organization. At last this internship has given me new insights and motivation to pursue a career in mechanical engineering.
This document discusses CATIA software and its uses in design and manufacturing. It then describes the Baja SAE competition where students design, build, and race off-road vehicles. Finally, it outlines different types of vehicle chassis designs, materials used, and considerations for structural analysis and testing.
This document is a thesis submitted by Pravardhan S. Shenoy to the University of Toledo in partial fulfillment of a Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering. The thesis, advised by Dr. Ali Fatemi, involves dynamic load analysis and optimization of a connecting rod. The study performs load analysis on the connecting rod to determine dynamic loads over time. Finite element analysis is conducted under quasi-dynamic and static loads. The connecting rod is then optimized for weight and cost subject to constraints like fatigue life.
KERS systems capture kinetic energy lost during braking and store it to provide a power boost by releasing stored energy. There are two main types - electrical systems store energy in batteries while mechanical systems use a flywheel. Formula One introduced KERS in 2009 to increase overtaking opportunities by providing a short power boost. Mechanical KERS has higher efficiency than electrical systems as it avoids multiple energy conversions.
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF LEAF SPRING BY USING COMPOSITE MATERIAL FOR LIGHT VEHI...IAEME Publication
The document describes the design and analysis of a composite leaf spring to replace the steel leaf spring on a Mahindra Commander 650 DI light vehicle. Leaf springs are commonly used for vehicle suspension but are heavy. The goal was to design a composite leaf spring using glass fiber reinforced polymer (E-glass/epoxy) that is lighter than the steel spring while maintaining stiffness. The composite leaf spring design was modeled in Pro/ENGINEER and analyzed in ANSYS software. Results showed the composite leaf spring design weighed 85% less than the steel design while meeting the stiffness requirements.
This document summarizes the key components and classification of automobile chassis. It discusses how a chassis consists of the engine, brakes, steering system, and wheels mounted on a frame along with other components like the transmission and controls. It then classifies automobiles based on factors like capacity, power source, number of wheels, and where the engine is located. Different types of frames are also outlined including conventional, integral, and semi-integral frames. The functions of various vehicle systems and forces acting on the chassis are summarized as well.
This document discusses vehicle construction and classifications. It defines the key parts of vehicles, including the frame, body sections, and major structural components. There are three main types of frame construction: body-over-frame, unibody, and space frame. Vehicles are also classified by their size, shape, engine location, drivetrain, and roof design. The document provides details on the front, center, and rear body sections and identifies important parts like pillars, panels, and assemblies.
Brief presentation on the manufacture of Aluminium alloy wheels by various methods and the innovations of the present. Made with the help of Siddharth Rawat and Yash Choudhary PS: Download and view in powerpoint for effects.. some text are hidden by pictures.
Self-energizing brakes use the force of a rotating drum to increase brake pressure. When the brakes are applied while moving forward, the primary shoe moves in the direction of drum rotation, pulling the linked secondary shoe around the anchor pin to force both shoes tighter against the drum. Similarly, when reversing, the secondary shoe moves clockwise to push the primary shoe tighter against the anchor pin, increasing brake pressure.
This document provides an overview of the drive train, also called the power train, which transfers power from the engine to the wheels. It lists the key components of the drive train as the transmission, drive shaft or drive line, and differential. It then explains how each component works, such as how a transmission uses gears to provide different output ratios to the wheels, and how the differential allows the outside wheel to turn faster than the inside wheel during a turn. The document aims to help readers understand the basic functioning of the drive train.
The document discusses various components that connect the transmission to the drive wheels, including the propeller shaft, universal joints, constant velocity joints, and slip joints. It provides details on the construction and function of each component. The propeller shaft transmits power from the transmission to the rear differential. Universal joints and constant velocity joints allow the shaft to transmit power through varying angles, while slip joints allow adjustments to the shaft length during vehicle movement.
Chassis is the main support structure of the vehicle which is also known as ‘Carrying Unit’. It bears all the stresses on the vehicle in both static and dynamic conditions.”
1) The document discusses the design of shafts subjected to different loading conditions including bending, torsion, combined bending and torsion, fluctuating loads, and axial loads.
2) Formulas are provided to calculate the equivalent bending moment and equivalent twisting moment for shafts under various loading conditions.
3) Examples are presented to demonstrate how to use the formulas and determine the necessary shaft diameter based on allowable stresses.
The document is a seminar paper submitted by a mechanical engineering student named Sivakumar about mechanical fuel pumps. It introduces mechanical fuel pumps, noting they are mounted on engines and contain an airtight, flexible diaphragm linked to a rocker arm that rests on an offset section of the engine camshaft. A diagram is included, and the working explains that when the carburetor float bowl is full, the inlet valve closes, increasing pressure in the line to the pump and pushing the diaphragm down against a spring.
Here are the key specifications of the components used in a double jaw vise:
- Mild steel: The main structural components of the vise like the jaws, spindle, frame are made of mild steel which is a low carbon steel with up to 0.25% carbon content. Mild steel provides strength while being easy to machine.
- Double jaw vise spindle: The spindle that holds and operates the movable jaw uses a differential screw mechanism. It has two screw threads of slightly different pitches on the rod and barrel. Rotating the handle moves the jaws by a precise amount based on the difference between the thread pitches, allowing fine adjustments.
- Nut and bolt: Standard nuts and bolts are used to
This document describes the design, testing, and construction of a composite chassis for a Formula SAE race car. Material testing was conducted to determine the optimal composite panel configuration that would meet strength and stiffness requirements. Various core thicknesses, skin thicknesses, and fiber orientations were tested. Based on the results, the chassis was constructed of carbon fiber-skinned aluminum honeycomb panels, cut and folded to form the desired shape. The process involved extensive testing and iteration to develop a lightweight yet rigid chassis that complied with competition regulations.
check it out: http://goo.gl/vqNk7m
CADmantra Technologies pvt. Ltd. is a CAD Training institute specilized in producing quality and high standard education and training. We are providing a perfact institute for the students intersted in CAD courses CADmantra is established by a group of engineers to devlop good training system in the field of CAD/CAM/CAE, these courses are widely accepted worldwide.
#catiatraining
#ANSYS #CRE-O
#hypermesh
#Automobileworkshops
#enginedevelopment
#autocad
#sketching
This document discusses the fabrication of composite leaf springs for vehicle suspension systems. It aims to reduce vehicle weight through the use of composite materials like glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) instead of conventional steel springs. The document outlines the manufacturing process of composite leaf springs using hand lay-up techniques with GFRP and epoxy. It also summarizes the advantages of composite leaf springs like reduced weight and corrosion resistance compared to steel, though their production cost is currently higher. Experimental testing showed composite leaf springs have lower deflection and bending stress than steel springs under the same loads.
This document discusses vehicle handling and summarizes key concepts related to steady state and transient handling behavior. It covers topics such as Ackerman steering geometry, low and high speed cornering, tire cornering stiffness, understeer and oversteer characteristics, and factors that influence steady state response including weight distribution and tire properties. Metrics for evaluating vehicle response like understeer gradient, characteristic speed, and static margin are also introduced.
This document contains a thermodynamics lab report submitted by a mechanical engineering student. The report summarizes 11 experiments conducted in the thermodynamics lab, including demonstrations of internal combustion engine components and systems, different engine types, and measurements. It also includes detailed descriptions of 3 specific experiments on introducing the lab and layout, demonstrating main engine components, and demonstrating 2-stroke and 4-stroke engines.
Mercedes benz service centre training reportPanchal Anand
Industrial training (Internship) Report.
Mercedes_benz Service centre.
Abstract: As a Mechanical Engineering Student I am very interested in automobile Engineering. I always keen to learn different mechanisms used in vehicles, I used to watch animated videos on YouTube about automobile mechanisms like Differential, Automatic transmission gearbox etc, but I never watched it in real. So, it was a great opportunity for me to do two weeks internship at Mercedes-benz Service centre, Ambli, Ahmedabad. The internship was concentrated on the car services. At the beginning of the internship I had several queries in my mind regarding the different technologies used in Mercedes-benz and what skills are needed in organization. During my internship several queries are cleared by doing some activities. The objective of this internship is to understand working of different mechanisms, to get knowledge of regular services and the major-minor problem that can be observed in day to day life. Apart from technical knowledge, I also learnt rules and safety instruction, Inventory management, Quality Control. I realize the responsibility of technicians working on the car. So, this internship was a great experience. I found out how much I am strong in automobile field. I gained new knowledge and skills and met many new people. Working together with people having different background and education was great experience. I also accompanied by other 2-3 students who were also on industrial training, so it was nice knowledge sharing. I achieved many of my learning goals. I got insight into the work of an organization. At last this internship has given me new insights and motivation to pursue a career in mechanical engineering.
This document discusses CATIA software and its uses in design and manufacturing. It then describes the Baja SAE competition where students design, build, and race off-road vehicles. Finally, it outlines different types of vehicle chassis designs, materials used, and considerations for structural analysis and testing.
This document is a thesis submitted by Pravardhan S. Shenoy to the University of Toledo in partial fulfillment of a Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering. The thesis, advised by Dr. Ali Fatemi, involves dynamic load analysis and optimization of a connecting rod. The study performs load analysis on the connecting rod to determine dynamic loads over time. Finite element analysis is conducted under quasi-dynamic and static loads. The connecting rod is then optimized for weight and cost subject to constraints like fatigue life.
KERS systems capture kinetic energy lost during braking and store it to provide a power boost by releasing stored energy. There are two main types - electrical systems store energy in batteries while mechanical systems use a flywheel. Formula One introduced KERS in 2009 to increase overtaking opportunities by providing a short power boost. Mechanical KERS has higher efficiency than electrical systems as it avoids multiple energy conversions.
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF LEAF SPRING BY USING COMPOSITE MATERIAL FOR LIGHT VEHI...IAEME Publication
The document describes the design and analysis of a composite leaf spring to replace the steel leaf spring on a Mahindra Commander 650 DI light vehicle. Leaf springs are commonly used for vehicle suspension but are heavy. The goal was to design a composite leaf spring using glass fiber reinforced polymer (E-glass/epoxy) that is lighter than the steel spring while maintaining stiffness. The composite leaf spring design was modeled in Pro/ENGINEER and analyzed in ANSYS software. Results showed the composite leaf spring design weighed 85% less than the steel design while meeting the stiffness requirements.
This document summarizes the key components and classification of automobile chassis. It discusses how a chassis consists of the engine, brakes, steering system, and wheels mounted on a frame along with other components like the transmission and controls. It then classifies automobiles based on factors like capacity, power source, number of wheels, and where the engine is located. Different types of frames are also outlined including conventional, integral, and semi-integral frames. The functions of various vehicle systems and forces acting on the chassis are summarized as well.
This document discusses vehicle construction and classifications. It defines the key parts of vehicles, including the frame, body sections, and major structural components. There are three main types of frame construction: body-over-frame, unibody, and space frame. Vehicles are also classified by their size, shape, engine location, drivetrain, and roof design. The document provides details on the front, center, and rear body sections and identifies important parts like pillars, panels, and assemblies.
Brief presentation on the manufacture of Aluminium alloy wheels by various methods and the innovations of the present. Made with the help of Siddharth Rawat and Yash Choudhary PS: Download and view in powerpoint for effects.. some text are hidden by pictures.
Self-energizing brakes use the force of a rotating drum to increase brake pressure. When the brakes are applied while moving forward, the primary shoe moves in the direction of drum rotation, pulling the linked secondary shoe around the anchor pin to force both shoes tighter against the drum. Similarly, when reversing, the secondary shoe moves clockwise to push the primary shoe tighter against the anchor pin, increasing brake pressure.
This document provides an overview of the drive train, also called the power train, which transfers power from the engine to the wheels. It lists the key components of the drive train as the transmission, drive shaft or drive line, and differential. It then explains how each component works, such as how a transmission uses gears to provide different output ratios to the wheels, and how the differential allows the outside wheel to turn faster than the inside wheel during a turn. The document aims to help readers understand the basic functioning of the drive train.
The document discusses various components that connect the transmission to the drive wheels, including the propeller shaft, universal joints, constant velocity joints, and slip joints. It provides details on the construction and function of each component. The propeller shaft transmits power from the transmission to the rear differential. Universal joints and constant velocity joints allow the shaft to transmit power through varying angles, while slip joints allow adjustments to the shaft length during vehicle movement.
Chassis is the main support structure of the vehicle which is also known as ‘Carrying Unit’. It bears all the stresses on the vehicle in both static and dynamic conditions.”
1) The document discusses the design of shafts subjected to different loading conditions including bending, torsion, combined bending and torsion, fluctuating loads, and axial loads.
2) Formulas are provided to calculate the equivalent bending moment and equivalent twisting moment for shafts under various loading conditions.
3) Examples are presented to demonstrate how to use the formulas and determine the necessary shaft diameter based on allowable stresses.
The document is a seminar paper submitted by a mechanical engineering student named Sivakumar about mechanical fuel pumps. It introduces mechanical fuel pumps, noting they are mounted on engines and contain an airtight, flexible diaphragm linked to a rocker arm that rests on an offset section of the engine camshaft. A diagram is included, and the working explains that when the carburetor float bowl is full, the inlet valve closes, increasing pressure in the line to the pump and pushing the diaphragm down against a spring.
Here are the key specifications of the components used in a double jaw vise:
- Mild steel: The main structural components of the vise like the jaws, spindle, frame are made of mild steel which is a low carbon steel with up to 0.25% carbon content. Mild steel provides strength while being easy to machine.
- Double jaw vise spindle: The spindle that holds and operates the movable jaw uses a differential screw mechanism. It has two screw threads of slightly different pitches on the rod and barrel. Rotating the handle moves the jaws by a precise amount based on the difference between the thread pitches, allowing fine adjustments.
- Nut and bolt: Standard nuts and bolts are used to
This document describes the design, testing, and construction of a composite chassis for a Formula SAE race car. Material testing was conducted to determine the optimal composite panel configuration that would meet strength and stiffness requirements. Various core thicknesses, skin thicknesses, and fiber orientations were tested. Based on the results, the chassis was constructed of carbon fiber-skinned aluminum honeycomb panels, cut and folded to form the desired shape. The process involved extensive testing and iteration to develop a lightweight yet rigid chassis that complied with competition regulations.
check it out: http://goo.gl/vqNk7m
CADmantra Technologies pvt. Ltd. is a CAD Training institute specilized in producing quality and high standard education and training. We are providing a perfact institute for the students intersted in CAD courses CADmantra is established by a group of engineers to devlop good training system in the field of CAD/CAM/CAE, these courses are widely accepted worldwide.
#catiatraining
#ANSYS #CRE-O
#hypermesh
#Automobileworkshops
#enginedevelopment
#autocad
#sketching
IRJET - Review on Design, Analysis and Fabrication of Race Car ChassisIRJET Journal
This document summarizes the design, analysis, and fabrication of a race car chassis. It discusses selecting lightweight yet stiff materials, such as steel alloys, to withstand forces from impacts and cornering. Finite element analysis is used to simulate impacts, bending, vibrations, and stresses to optimize the chassis design. The summary focuses on achieving high performance while ensuring driver safety.
Design of carbon composite structure as an alternative material for an automo...IRJET Journal
This document describes the design of a carbon composite monocoque chassis as an alternative to a steel space frame for an automobile using Ansys software. It discusses different types of chassis designs and materials used. The key is to design a lightweight yet stiff chassis. Various performance metrics for chassis such as weight, torsional stiffness, and strength are identified. Steps of the design process including material selection, modeling, meshing, composite layup definition, analysis and evaluation are outlined. Results obtained from simulations show the designed carbon composite chassis meets the design requirements of weight less than 25kg and torsional stiffness over 8 kN-m/rad/kg while maintaining a safety factor above 0.5 for strength.
The engineering report summarizes the design of a tubular space frame chassis for the Corvette C7. The chassis is made of AISI 4130 steel using metal inert gas welding. AISI 4130 was chosen over AISI 1020 due to its higher strength to weight ratio, which increases torsional rigidity while focusing on weight for the high performance sports car. The tubular space frame was designed using round and square steel tubes of varying dimensions, and features a triangulated structure to increase rigidity without shear stresses.
Design and impact analysis of an Automotive FrameIRJET Journal
1) The document discusses the design and impact analysis of an automotive frame using various materials. It summarizes previous research that analyzed different frame materials like carbon fiber, aluminum alloy, and steel alloys.
2) The study described in the document designs a ladder frame for a Toyota Tacoma using CAD software and then performs impact analysis on the frame using FEA software. It analyzes the frame's response when made of various materials including carbon fiber, magnesium alloy, aluminum alloy, structural steel, and stainless steel.
3) The results of the impact analysis, including stress, strain, and deformation, are compared between the different materials to determine the best material for the frame considering factors like weight and strength.
Design of Chassis for Automated Road Cleaning VehicleIRJET Journal
The document discusses the design of a chassis for an automated road cleaning vehicle. It begins with an introduction to chassis design and factors to consider like material choice, strength, stiffness, and weight. It then discusses the specific design of the automated vehicle chassis, including dimensions and use of mild steel as the material for its cost-effectiveness. The chassis is designed to support the vehicle weight and loads while withstanding various stresses. The summary concludes the document analyzes using mild steel to make the chassis cost-effective while meeting the strength and rigidity needs.
This document describes the design and analysis of a mono composite leaf spring with varying thicknesses using finite element analysis (FEA). The objective is to reduce the weight of conventional steel leaf springs by replacing them with composite leaf springs made of glass fiber reinforced composite (GFRC) material. A 3D model of the leaf spring is created in ANSYS and meshed. Static structural analysis is performed by applying a fixed support at one end and a cylindrical support and load at the other end. Results of the FEA show that as thickness increases from 28mm to 32mm, deflection decreases from 15.23mm to 13.12mm. Stress is also observed to decrease with increased thickness. The analysis demonstrates the potential to reduce weight
Design and Analysis of Mono Composite Leaf Spring by Varying Thickness using FEAIOSR Journals
This document summarizes a study on the design and analysis of a mono composite leaf spring with varying thickness using finite element analysis (FEA). A conventional steel leaf spring and composite leaf springs made of glass fiber reinforced composite (GFRC) were modeled in ANSYS. Static analysis was performed to analyze stress and deflection with thicknesses of 28mm, 30mm, and 32mm. Results found the composite leaf spring had lower stress and deflection than the steel spring. Graphs comparing the analytical and FEA results show good agreement. The composite leaf spring can meet requirements while providing weight reduction over the conventional spring.
Design and Analysis of Mono Composite Leaf Spring by Varying Thickness using FEAIOSR Journals
This document summarizes a study on the design and analysis of a mono composite leaf spring with varying thickness using finite element analysis (FEA). A conventional steel leaf spring and composite leaf springs made of glass fiber reinforced composite (GFRC) were modeled in ANSYS. Static analysis was performed to analyze stress and deflection with thicknesses of 28mm, 30mm, and 32mm. Results found the composite leaf spring had lower stress and deflection compared to the conventional spring. Graphs comparing the analytical and FEA results show good agreement. The composite leaf spring can meet requirements while providing weight reduction over the conventional spring.
Design and Analysis of Mono Composite Leaf Spring by Varying Thickness using FEAIOSR Journals
This document summarizes a study on the design and analysis of a mono composite leaf spring with varying thickness using finite element analysis (FEA). A glass fiber reinforced composite (GFRC) leaf spring was modeled and analyzed in ANSYS and compared to a conventional steel leaf spring. Static analysis was performed to evaluate stress and deflection under a 300kg load with leaf spring thicknesses of 28mm, 30mm, and 32mm. Both analytical calculations and FEA results showed that the composite leaf spring had lower stress and deflection compared to the steel spring, with performance improving as thickness increased. The composite leaf spring provides benefits such as reduced weight, increased damping, and better corrosion resistance compared to the conventional steel spring.
Standardized Connectors for Automotive Brake Tubing Overview: Modern Requirem...Stanislav Pliassounov
The document discusses the requirements and design of standardized automotive brake tubing connectors. Modern connectors must have a 99.9% probability of sealing on the first attempt during assembly to meet lean manufacturing goals. However, current connector designs rely too heavily on operator skill during assembly. To meet modern requirements, new connector designs need to eliminate operator dependency and be robust enough to seal even with minor assembly errors or variations, targeting failure rates of less than 4 per million. This would help connectors pass quality control testing and perform reliably during vehicle use.
Design and analysis of a tubular space frame chassis of a high performance ra...eSAT Journals
Abstract Formula Student Racing competitions are held at various Formula SAE circuits globally. Students from different colleges worldwide thrive to build a Formula style race car to compete at these events. In lieu to the competition rules and regulations it is important to design the chassis of the car with utmost priority. The major challenge posed is to design and fabricate a light weight car without compromising on the safety of the driver. The car has to be rigidly fabricated at minimal expense. The work in this paper is based on the team NITK Racing’s Car; the DICV NR XIV. This paper showcases various methods of material selection, design optimization techniques and Finite element analysis (FEA) using ANSYS. The basic design is based on the anthropological data of the specified human (95th percentile male) allowing fast ingress and egress from the car. Following the final design selection the static structural analysis of the car was done and the consequent results have been plotted. The entire design and analysis process is based on FSAE 2013 rule book and knowledge of designing and manufacturing yesteryear’s car. Keywords: ergonomics, finite element analysis, roll cage, torsional rigidity, tubular space frame chassis, and validation test setup
IJRET : International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology is an international peer reviewed, online journal published by eSAT Publishing House for the enhancement of research in various disciplines of Engineering and Technology. The aim and scope of the journal is to provide an academic medium and an important reference for the advancement and dissemination of research results that support high-level learning, teaching and research in the fields of Engineering and Technology. We bring together Scientists, Academician, Field Engineers, Scholars and Students of related fields of Engineering and Technology
This document summarizes a study on optimizing the design of a car wheel rim through finite element analysis. A car rim model is created in CATIA and analyzed in ANSYS Workbench under different loading conditions and with three materials: aluminum alloy, magnesium alloy, and structural steel. The total deformation and directional deformation are compared for each material under individual and combined loading of pressure, nodal force, and rotational velocity. The results show that structural steel has the lowest deformation under pressure and nodal force loading, while magnesium alloy performs best under rotational loading and shows the lowest overall deformation when all loads are combined.
IRJET- Material Optimization of Wheel Hub using Finite Element AnalysisIRJET Journal
The document discusses material optimization of a wheel hub using finite element analysis. The researchers analyzed different materials, including various aluminum alloys, to reduce the weight of the wheel hub while maintaining its load carrying capacity and strength. Finite element analysis was conducted on a wheel hub model designed in CATIA and analyzed in ANSYS. This analysis determined stresses, deformation, and fatigue life. Testing was also conducted on material specimens to validate the finite element analysis results. The study aims to select the best performing material, with 7075 aluminum alloy found to provide high strength comparable to steel while reducing weight.
IRJET-Multi-Material & Lightweight Design Optimization of a Volvo B9r Bus Fra...IRJET Journal
This document summarizes a study that optimized the frame structure of a Volvo B9R bus for lightweight design while improving rollover safety. The researchers modeled the original bus frame in CAD and FE software and simulated a rollover crash using two different materials - low carbon steel (baseline) and Docol steel. Simulation results showed that replacing parts of the frame with Docol improved energy absorption and reduced displacement during rollover compared to the baseline model. This allows for a lighter bus structure that meets safety standards and improves passenger protection, which are increasingly important considerations in bus design.
The document discusses the development of a composite accelerator pedal for automobiles to reduce weight. It begins with an introduction to composite materials and their properties that make them suitable for interior automotive components. It then discusses the development process using concurrent engineering approaches including design concept generation, material selection, and analysis. The literature review covers past research on using composites for other automotive applications like bumpers and leaf springs. The aim of the project is to use different design concepts and materials for the accelerator pedal and select the best one based on finite element analysis of factors like stress, displacement, and weight.
IRJET- Analysis of Automobile Rim on Strain CriteriaIRJET Journal
This document discusses replacing spot welds with arc welds on automobile steel wheel rims using finite element analysis. The objectives are to improve productivity by reducing welding time compared to spot welding and to analyze stress distribution under various tests. A finite element analysis model of the wheel rim was developed to study stresses under dynamic cornering fatigue testing and influence of tire pressure and vehicle load under radial fatigue testing. Experimental testing will also be conducted and results will be compared to finite element analysis to validate the best combinations of arc weld parameters to both improve productivity and meet strength requirements.
IRJET- Design of an Electric Golf Cart with Batteries & Solar Panel for 6...IRJET Journal
- The document describes the design of an electric golf cart with six seats that is powered by batteries and a solar panel.
- Key aspects of the design covered include the tubular frame chassis, single-speed transmission system using a transaxle and electric motor, braking system, steering geometry, battery calculations to achieve a range of 23 miles, and the addition of solar panels to increase the range by 12 more miles.
- The goal of the design was to create a lightweight yet rigid golf cart that can perform well on grassy and concrete surfaces for use at golf courses and in the hospitality industry.
IRJET- Design of an Electric Golf Cart with Batteries & Solar Panel for 6...
Final Chassis Report 2010
1. EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY
Design and Construction
of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
Tom James Ayres
11/1/2010
For 2010, Edith Cowan University is entering a composite monocoque chassis produced by
the team for the first time. This chassis has been a result of an extensive material testing
program, and has been designed to be a safer, lighter and stiffer chassis than the previous
years’ entries. This report outlines the design material testing and construction phases of
the project.
Executive Summary
2. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 2
CONTENTS
1. Introduction p3
2. Chassis Design p4
3. Material Selection p5
4. Composite Material Testing p7
4.1. Initial Material Testing p9
4.2. Secondary Material Testing p11
4.2.1. Varying Core Thickness p11
4.2.2. Varying Skin Thickness p13
4.2.3. Ribbon Direction p15
4.3. Final Material Testing p17
4.4. Steel Tube Testing p19
4.5. Perimeter Shear Strength Testing p20
5. Attachment Points p24
5.1. Insert Design p24
5.2. Insert Shear Testing p25
5.3. Insert Pull-out Testing p28
5.4. Insert Chassis Mounting p31
6. Chassis Construction p32
6.1. First Iteration p33
6.2. Second Iteration p34
6.3. Final Chassis Construction p36
6.3.1. CNC Routing p36
6.3.2. Adhesion of Folds p39
6.3.3. Front Roll Hoop Attachment p45
6.3.4. Cockpit Closeouts p46
7. Future Recommendations p48
8. Conclusion p49
9. References p50
Appendix A – Structural Equivalency Report
3. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 3
1. Introduction
For the 2010 F-SAE car, the decision was made to move from a tubular steel space-frame
chassis to a composite monocoque chassis. Monocoque chassis can have many advantages
over a steel construction with the potential for higher stiffness, greater safety for the driver,
shorter build time and savings in weight, along with a greatly reduced need for external
body work on the car. The method used to build the 2010 chassis was a “cut and fold”
technique, which was applied to pre-fabricated aluminium honeycomb panels with carbon
fibre skins.
While the decision was made to use these panels for the construction of the chassis in the
early stages of the project, an extensive material testing program was carried out to
determine a composite panel configuration which was suitable for F-SAE chassis
construction. A method of attaching components to the chassis also had to be designed and
tested as part of the project, and techniques for the construction of the chassis itself needed
to be investigated.
This report describes the process of designing, testing and building the 2010 F-SAE chassis in
detail.
4. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 4
Figure 1: The 2010 F-SAE car at "rolling chassis" stage of construction
2. Chassis Design
Rather than building a full monocoque chassis, it was decided that the 2010 chassis would
consist of a composite monocoque “tub” forward of the main roll hoop, with a tubular steel
frame rearwards of the main hoop incorporating a composite “rear plate” to tie the rear of
the frame together and provide a mounting surface for the rear suspension and differential.
The geometrical design of the 2010 chassis is based on dimensions of the previous year’s car
with some modification to allow mounting of front lower A-Arms and the steering rack
underneath the front of the chassis. The angles of the upper sides of the front of the chassis
were also tailored to suit the angles which the rockers are required to be mounted at,
allowing the rocker and damper assembly to be neatly mounted to the exterior of the front
of the chassis.
The design of the chassis was modelled in Solidworks computer design software, in two
parts, which were joined at the front roll hoop. The Solidworks model was then converted
into a “sheet-metal” part of the same thickness of the honeycomb panels which allowed a
5. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 5
flat pattern to be generated. This flat pattern was used for the routing of the composite
panels so that an accurate copy of the part could be manufactured.
Computer modelling of the composite chassis is a great advantage as it allows for clearances
for templates specified in the F-SAE rules (SAE 2010), and precise angles for suspension
mounting to be checked and reviewed efficiently before manufacture of the chassis begins.
3. Material Selection
It was decided to use a carbon fibre skinned aluminium honeycomb sandwich panel for the
construction of the composite chassis because of the high strength and stiffness of the
composite structure in relation to its weight. Sandwich panels are able to have high levels of
strength and stiffness in relation to their weight because most of the mass is concentrated
in the skins of the panel, which take the majority of the loads in a bending situation. Figure 2
shows the construction of a honeycomb panel.
Figure 2: A Honeycomb Panel
For any material, the peak compressive and tensile forces generated in a bending situation
are concentrated at the surfaces of the material. Honeycomb panels exploit this
characteristic and provide a light weight filler material between the panel skins. The thicker
this core material, the more stiff a panel becomes (see Figure 3:
http://www.hexcel.com/NR/rdonlyres/599A3453-316D-46D6-9AEE-
C337D8B547CA/0/HexwebAttributesandProperties.pdf cited on the 1/11/2010 ).
6. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 6
Figure 3: A Table showing relative stiffness vs core thickness
Although increasing core thickness increases adds stiffness to the material, the skin material
and thickness also determines the stiffness and strength of the sandwich panel. Carbon fibre
was chosen for the skin material in the 2010 chassis’ panels because of the material’s high
strength to weight ratio, which is much higher than aluminium or steel. Carbon fibre was
also chosen to be used instead of a standard aluminium skin because the number and
orientation of plies of carbon fibre can be tailored to suit the chassis construction.
The decision was made to use pre-fabricated composite panels for the composite
monocoque chassis, “cut and folded” to form the desired shape, rather than manufacturing
a moulded composite monocoque for a variety of reasons. These reasons include; ease of
manufacture, reliability of cure process, and reduced cost of manufacture.
Perhaps the most important reason for use of pre-fabricated panels is the reliability of the
cure process of the composite material. Because the flat panels are made using a heat press
using a process that has been perfected over years of manufacturing, the panels are
guaranteed to have a more even and reliable skin to core adhesion and structural integrity
than a chassis which is “vacuum bagged”. Chassis, or other composite components,
especially involving honeycomb, which are vacuum bagged in a mould are liable to a variety
of defects which compromise the structural integrity of the part. These defects include poor
skin to core adhesion, surface pitting, poor bonding between layers of fibre, and bridging of
the mould.
7. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 7
Another important advantage of the “cut and fold” technique using pre-fabricated panels is
the ease of manufacture. Because a “cut and folded” structure requires no moulds for its
construction and can be made using only basic cutting tools, the construction of a chassis is
much simpler and easier than a moulded composite chassis. Being easy to manufacture also
cuts the build time down allowing more man-hours to be focussed in other areas.
4. Composite Material Testing
To comply with Formula-SAE rules (SAE 2010), the composite material used for construction
of the chassis needs to meet various strength and stiffness requirements. The yield and
ultimate strengths of a section of panel 200mm wide by 500mm long must be greater than
or equal to the yield and ultimate strengths of two baseline steel side impact tubes, and the
stiffness must be greater than one baseline steel side impact tube in a three point bending
test configuration.
To perform these tests, a three point bending test jig was constructed to be compatible with
the Instron 5569 Universal material testing machine located in ECU’s material testing
laboratory (see Figure 4). Due to size constraints of the machine, specimens 100mm wide
and 350mm long were tested and calculations were performed to compare the results of
these tests to requirements in the F-SAE rules (SAE 2010).
To obtain meaningful results, it was necessary to place 30mm wide strips of steel (with a
radius on the edges) at the loading points of the three point bending test jig. These strips of
steel are to help distribute the load evenly into the panel so that localised failure, due to
crushing of the honeycomb core, does not occur. Premature failures of this nature produce
inaccurate results because the panel itself is not being loaded, only localised failures are
induced.
8. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 8
Figure 4: Three Point Testing Jig
To compare the three point test results to baseline steel side impact tubes, the yield and
ultimate strengths and stiffness of steel tube were determined through calculations. The F-
SAE rules (SAE 2010) do not specify a particular steel alloy for steel tubing so properties of
AISI 1020 steel are used. The values are tabulated below.
Tensile Strength 365 MPa
Yield Strength 305 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity 200 GPa
Table 1: Steel properties
The calculations for a round tube 25.4mm x 1.60mm as approved in the F-SAE rules (SAE
2010) for a baseline side impact tube are shown below:
( )
9. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 9
Failure in bending is given by the following equation:
Calculating for one baseline side impact tube:
Yield Failure 3.27 kN
Ultimate Failure 3.91 kN
Table 2: Side Impact Single Tube Failure
Multiplying these forces by 2 provides the force required to bend two baseline side impact
tubes:
Yield Failure 6.54 kN
Ultimate Failure 7.82 kN
Table 3: side impact two tube failure
For a three point bend test the maximum deflection is given by the following equation:
Rearranging:
EI becomes a measure of stiffness for the tube, which can be determined experimentally for
the panel.
With the strength and stiffness targets for the composite panels calculated, a series of
physical tests were carried out on composite panels to determine the ideal layup.
4.1 Initial Material Testing
To begin with, a carbon fibre skinned aluminium honeycomb panel was manufactured for
testing using a single ply of 200gsm twill weave carbon fibre pre-preg adhered either side of
a 20mm thick 1/4” cell honeycomb core by a 250gsm ply of glass fibre pre-preg. This ply of
glass fibre was recommended by the manufacturer to be used because of its high resin
10. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 10
content which would bond well to the core and also the glass fibre was stocked by the
manufacturer.
Two series of tests were carried out on this panel; the first with the fibres of the carbon
fibre weave aligned along the length of the test piece(see Figure 5), and the second with the
carbon fibres aligned at 45° to the length of the samples. The glass fibres are aligned at 45°
to the carbon fibres (Figure 6).
Figure 5: Graph showing three point test data for carbon aligned at 0 degrees to the length of the test piece
Figure 6: Graph of test data for carbon aligned at 45 degrees
These two series of test show that; a) the samples with the carbon fibres aligned with the
length of the test piece perform better in terms of strength and stiffness than the samples
with the carbon fibres aligned at 45° to the test piece, and; b) the mode of failure is brittle in
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Load-N
Displacement - mm
Test Series 1 (carbon @ 0°)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Load-N
Displacement - mm
Test Series 2 (carbon @ 45°)
11. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 11
nature and there is little yielding of the composite material before ultimate failure. For the
purpose of comparing the yield strength of the composite material to the steel tube, yield
strength is assumed to be equal to ultimate strength.
The test series which has the carbon fibres aligned along the length of the sample had an
ultimate/yield strength of about 3.6kN, and an EI (buckling modulus, a measure of stiffness)
of 2.5x108
Nmm2
. The EI was calculated using the following equation between loads of
0.5kN to 2kN to eliminate the early deflection of the testing jigs. These results will be
multiplied by two to simulate a 200mm wide panel as required in the rules (SAE 2010).
The yield and ultimate strengths needed to be greater than 6.54kN and 7.82kN respectively
to be stronger than the two steel side impact tubes. The EI of the panel had to be greater
than 1.7 x 109
Nmm2
to be stiffer than the steel tube. Table 4 below shows the properties of
the composite panel relative to the properties required by the F-SAE rules (SAE 2010).
Yield Strength Ultimate Strength EI
Composite Panel 7.2kN 7.2kN 5.0 x 108 Nmm2
Required by rules 6.54kN 7.82kN 1.7 x 109 Nmm2
Table 4: Composite panel vs baseline steel properties
These results show that the panel needs to be stronger in ultimate strength, and also over
two times stiffer.
4.2 Secondary Material Testing
After testing of the initial panel, which indicated that the composite panel needed to be
significantly stiffer, a secondary series of tests was carried out to determine experimentally
the effects of increasing skin thickness and core thickness. This series of tests involved three
point flexure tests of a variety of aluminium skinned panels of different core thickness and
skin thickness. These tests also investigated the effect of the ribbon direction of the
honeycomb core on the strength and stiffness of the panels.
4.2.1Varying Core Thickness
Three point tests were carried out on aluminium skinned panels with thicknesses of 10mm,
20mm and 50mm each with 0.5mm thick aluminium skins. These tests were intended to
experimentally show the relationship between panel thickness and stiffness and strength.
Graphs showing the results of these tests are shown below in Figures 7 and 8.
12. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 12
Figure 7: Graphs of three point bend test results for 10mm, 20mm, 50mm thick 0.5mm aluminium skinned panels
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
10mm 0.5/0.5
#1
#2 (defect)
#3
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 5 10 15
20mm 0.5/0.5
#1
#2 (93mm)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
-1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
50mm 0.5/0.5
#1
#2
13. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 13
Figure 8: Comparison of stiffness and ultimate strength with varying core thickness
It can be seen from these results that increasing the panel thickness significantly increases
the stiffness and strength of the panel.
4.2.2Varying Skin Thickness
A second series of tests were carried out on aluminium skinned panels to investigate the
effect of skin thickness on stiffness and strength. 20mm thick panels were tested with
0.3mm, 0.5mm and 1.0mm thick skins (see Figure 9). Increasing skin thickness seemed to
have no significant effect on strength of the panel, but stiffness increased noticably.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
StiffnessN/mm
Core thickness
Stiffness @ 1000N with varying core
thickness
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
FailureLoad-N
Core thickness - mm
Ultimate strength with varying core
thickness
14. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 14
Figure 9: Graphs of three point test data from 20mm panels with 0.3mm, 0.5mm, 1.0mm aluminium skins
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
-1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
20mm 0.3/0.3
#1
#2
#3
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 5 10 15
20mm 0.5/0.5
#1
#2 (93mm)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
-1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
20mm 1.0/1.0
#2
#1
15. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 15
Figure 10: Comparison of ultimate strength and stiffness with skin thickness
The failure to see an increase in strength with increasing skin thickness is likely due to
localised failure of the panel at the loading points of the three point test jig.
4.2.3Ribbon Direction
Aluminium honeycomb is made up of ribbons of aluminium foil glued together at intervals
and expanded to form hexagonal voids in the material (see Figure 11:
http://www.hexcel.com/NR/rdonlyres/599A3453-316D-46D6-9AEE-
C337D8B547CA/0/HexwebAttributesandProperties.pdf cited on the 1/11/2010). The
direction that these continuous ribbons run, have an effect on the properties of the
honeycomb in different orientations. It can be expected that the honeycomb will be
stronger and stiffer in the direction that the ribbons run.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Ultimateload-N
Skin thickness - mm
Ultimate failure load with increasing skin
thickness
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Deflection-mm
Skin Thickness - mm
Deflection with increasing skin thickness
16. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 16
Figure 11: Diagram of aluminium honeycomb manufacture
The standard procedure for flexure testing honeycomb panels is to orient the ribbons of
honeycomb across the test specimen in the weakest orientation. The F-SAE rules (SAE 2010)
however do not specify this test condition, and the orientation of the honeycomb ribbons in
the chassis itself will be along the length of the car so there is no reason not to test the
panels in the strongest orientation.
Three point tests were performed on 30mm (0.5mm skins) panels to investigate how much
this ribbon orientation affects the stiffness and strength of the panels.
Figure 12: Graph of three point tests on samples with different honeycomb ribbon orientation
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Load(N)
Deflection (mm)
Effect of Ribbon Orientation
3-Point Tests
Long Ribbon 1
Long Ribbon 2
Long Ribbon 3
Short Ribbon 1
Short Ribbon 2
Short Ribbon 3
17. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 17
As displayed in the above graph (Figure 12) the panel specimens with a “long ribbon” (the
ribbon running along the length of the test sample) are significantly stronger and stiffer than
the “short ribbon” samples.
4.3 Final Material Testing
Through the knowledge gained from the previous three point test series, a carbon fibre
skinned test panel was manufactured with a 30mm thick aluminium honeycomb core and a
variety of different combinations of ply numbers and orientations of carbon fibre pre-preg.
Two methods of adhering the skins to the core were also trialled with a glass fibre pre-preg
used for some samples and an epoxy film adhesive used as an alternative.
Due to the number of different combinations of ply orientations of the different test
samples, a nomenclature system was developed to number the samples and to easily
recognise the layup of the panels. For example “G90-C90-2C45” means one ply of glass fibre
aligned at 90° to the test piece, one ply of carbon fibre aligned at 90°, and two plies of
carbon fibre aligned at 45° to the length of the test piece, either side of the panel.
The results from the testing of these panels are displayed in graphical form (Figure 13)
below;
Figure 13: Comparison of three point bend test results with different carbon fibre ply orientations
The results of the bending tests show that increasing the number of plies of carbon fibre
aligned at 90° to the length of the test panel improves stiffness, while the ultimate strength
seems to decrease. This decrease in ultimate strength is believed to be due to the load
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1 2 3 4
Load(N)
Deflection (mm)
3 Point Bend Tests of 30mm Core With
Carbon Only Skins
2C90 C45 (1)
2C90 C45 (2)
3C90 (1)
3C90 (2)
C90 2C45 (1)
C90 2C45 (2)
4C90 (1)
4C90 (2)
18. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 18
applied to the panel in the three point tests being more concentrated in the middle of the
panel at the loading point as the panel stiffness increases. This concentration of the load
results in localised crushing of the core and premature failure of the panel.
The above results only show the combinations of carbon fibre plies adhered to the core with
an epoxy film adhesive. Testing of panels with the carbon fibre adhered to the core with
glass fibre show a further increase in stiffness when the glass fibres are aligned at 90° to the
length of the test panel (see Figure 14).
Figure 14: Comparison of three point test results with different skin adhesion methods
Although the panels with glass fibre included in the lay-up were slightly stiffer, they were
also heavier which is why the epoxy film adhesive was chosen for use in the chassis. The lay-
up chosen for construction of the 2010 F-SAE chassis was “2C90-C45”. This lay-up was
chosen because it satisfies the requirements of the rules (SAE 2010), is relatively
lightweight, and also provides torsional stiffness to the chassis with the ply of carbon fibre
aligned at 45°.
The composite panel chosen for use in the F-SAE chassis out-performs the baseline steel
tube in both strength and stiffness (see Table 5).
Ultimate/Yield Strength EI (stiffness)
Steel Tube (Rules) 7,820N 1.7 x 109 Nmm2
Composite Panel (2C90-C45) 14,000N 2.12 x 109 Nmm2
Table 5: Table showing properties of composite panels vs calculated baseline steel tube properties
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Load(N)
Deflection (mm)
3 Point Bend Tests:
Glass Fibre vs Film Adhesive
G45-2C90-C45 (1)
G45-2C90-C45 (2)
G90-2C90-C45 (1)
G90-2C90-C45 (2)
2C90-C45 (1)
2C90 C45 (2)
19. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 19
4.4 Steel Tube Testing
In order to experimentally determine the strength and stiffness of steel tube, a series of
three point bending tests were carried out on steel tubing for comparison to calculated
values. These tests were performed under the same testing conditions as the three point
composite tests to provide consistency across the results and to determine a margin of error
which is present in the testing facilities (see Figure 15).
Due to availability, a 25.4mm x 1.4mm round steel tube was tested rather than the standard
side impact tube. This test was not designed for a direct comparison to the composite
monocoque structure, but rather to prove that the calculated properties of steel tube will
not be seen in testing due to deflection of the jigs and connections.
Figure 15: Steel Tube 3 point bend test
20. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 20
Table 6 displays the results of a typical three point bending test on a (25.4mm x 1.4mm)
steel tube and the corresponding calculated properties.
Stiffness Ultimate Load Yield Load EI
Measured Properties 2686 N/mm 4250 N 3000 N 0.8 x 109Nmm2
Calculated
Properties
4685 N/mm 3507 N 2930 N 1.58 x 109Nmm2
Table 6: Comparison of measured and calculated
These results show that the yield and ultimate loads are both slightly underestimated by the
calculations because the calculations are based on properties of a softer grade of steel. The
stiffness, however, is overestimated by a factor of more than 1.7. This lack of stiffness seen
in the physical test of the tube is due to deflection in the testing apparatus, and localised
deflection of the tube around the loading points. A second series of three point bending
tests were performed to demonstrate the overestimation of stiffness by calculation. These
tests were carried out on 4130 High strength steel tube with dimensions of (25.4mm x
1.2mm) and (25.4mm x 2.4mm).
Calculated
Stiffness
(N/mm)
Measure
d
Stiffness
(N/mm)
% of
Calculated
EI Calculated
(Nmm2)
EI
Measured
(Nmm2)
25.4mm x
1.2mm Tube
4113 3000 73 1.34 x 109 0.98 x 109
25.4mm x
2.4mm Tube
7122 5602 79 2.32 x 109 1.82 x 109
Table 7: comparison of measured and calculated II
These results (Table 7) clearly show that the calculated stiffness for a given steel tube
cannot be used to compare to the composite laminate. The calculations consistently
overestimate the stiffness of the steel tube when compared to experimental results.
4.5 Perimeter Shear Strength
To comply with Formula SAE rules (SAE 2010), a perimeter shear test was required to test
the anti-intrusion protection provided by the composite material. This test involved forcing
21. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 21
a 1” diameter object through the skin of the panel and measuring the force required to
break through. The rules (SAE 2010) specify that the perimeter shear strength must at least
7.5kN in the side impact zone of the chassis. Figure 16 shows the perimeter testing
apparatus.
Figure 16: Perimeter Shear Test apparatus
Testing of the carbon fibre skinned honeycomb panels used in the chassis construction
revealed that the perimeter shear strength, for the 1” diameter object, is just over 4kN (see
Figure 17). This performance is significantly less than the required 7.5kN so a method of
spreading the load from the 1” diameter object needed to be developed.
22. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 22
Figure 17: Initial perimeter shear test results
A second series of perimeter shear tests were carried out with a variety of different coatings
applied to the outside skin of the carbon fibre panels. These included a thin aluminium
sheet (0.3mm) glued on with epoxy resin, an aluminium sheet glued with a thermo-setting
plastic glue, and a wet laid –up ply of Kevlar. The results of these tests are displayed below
(Figures 18, 19 and 20).
Figure 18: Perimeter shear test with 0.3mm aluminium sheet added to the lay-up, glued with epoxy resin
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5
Load(N)
Deflection (mm)
Perimeter Shear Strength (Carbon Fibre
Skins)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Load(N)
Deflection (mm)
Perimeter Shear Test with 0.3 aluminium
(epoxy glue)
23. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 23
Figure 19: Perimeter shear test with 0.3mm aluminium sheet, glued with thermo-setting plastic glue
Figure 20: Perimeter shear test with wet laid-up Kevlar
It can be seen from the results of the first perimeter shear test with the epoxy resin gluing
the 0.3mm aluminium sheet to the panel failed prematurely from the 7.5kN requirement.
From observation of the tests, it was clear that the panel failed early because the adhesion
of the aluminium to the carbon fibre also failed early. This early failure can be seen as
“steps” in the load vs deflection graph.
A second test was performed on the same aluminium sheet as the previous test glued to the
carbon fibre with a thermo-setting plastic adhesive. This test showed that the plastic
adhesive far outperformed the epoxy resin and allowed the panel to withstand up to around
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Load(N)
Deflection (mm)
Perimeter shear Test with 0.3mm
aluminium (plastic glue)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Load(N)
Deflection (mm)
Perimeter Shear Test
with Kevlar
24. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 24
9.5kN. The Kevlar coated panels also performed very well and failed at around 13.5kN, well
exceeding the requirements of the F-SAE rules (SAE 2010).
The coating decided on for the actual construction of the side impact zone of the 2010 ECU
chassis was the 0.3mm aluminium sheet. This sheet was glued to the chassis using a high
performance polyurethane adhesive (Sikaflex™). The thermosetting adhesive was not used
due to concerns about heating the honeycomb chassis to the temperatures required to cure
the adhesive.
Although it performed well, Kevlar was not used as a coating as the fabric that was tested
was heavier than the aluminium coating. In future years however, further testing may reveal
that a finer weave of Kevlar may be preferable to the aluminium sheet.
5. Attachment Points
5.1 Insert Design
To provide a secure method of mounting components to the composite monocoque, inserts
are used to transfer loads to the chassis which prevent crushing of the core and efficient
transfer of loads to the skins of the composite sandwich structure.
These inserts, or “ferrules”, are machined from L168 Aluminium which is an alloy used in
Aerospace, Defence and High Technology applications. Inserts were then treated by chromic
acid anodising for protection against corrosion, which was a concern because of the
proximity to carbon fibre which could result in galvanic corrosion. The inserts illustrated
below (Figure 21) are set into the panel with epoxy resin which is injected into the cavity
around the knurled part of the insert. The resin is injected through the holes machined into
the insert.
25. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 25
Figure 21: Insert Design
5.2 Insert Shear Testing
Physical tests were performed on inserts so that structural equivalency could be proven and
the number of these inserts required for attachment of various components could be
determined. Testing was carried out on an Instron 5569 material testing machine using a
custom made jig for holding the test pieces. The machine then pulls apart at a constant
strain rate of 0.1mm/second and a read-out of the forces induced is provided. Photographs
of the test procedure and test pieces are included below (Figures 22 and 23). The ultimate
failure load of these inserts in a shear was tested at 16.5kN.
26. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 26
Figure 22 : Insert shear test jig
27. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 27
Figure 23 : Insert Shear Test Piece
28. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 28
5.3 Insert Pull-out Testing
A second series of tests was carried out to determine the “pull-out” strength of the insert
design. This test is designed to discover the force required for the insert to be pulled
through the composite structure with a 50mmx1mm steel washer. Pictures of the test
apparatus and test specimens, along with a graph of a typical test result are included below
Figures 24 – 28).
Figure 24: insert pullout test
29. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 29
Figure 25: insert pullout test jig
Figure 26: insert pullout test piece
30. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 30
Figure 27: Insert pullout test piece
Figure 28: Insert pullout test graph
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Load(N)
Tensile Extension (mm)
Ferrule Pull-out Test 1
With 50mm Washer
31. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 31
From the results of this test series, it can be seen that this is the weakest direction of
loading for an attachment point. The peak load sustained in this direction was just over
10kN, but the insert continued to hold a load of over six kilo-Newtons for a further 10mm of
deflection indicating that a massive amount of energy can be absorbed by the pick-up point.
5.4 Insert Chassis Mounting
An issue that was encountered during the construction of the 2010 chassis was the drilling
of accurate holes for mounting of inserts. These holes needed to be perfectly perpendicular
to the surface of the chassis for the inserts to be installed correctly. The solution to this
problem was the construction of an improvised “drill press” attachment for a hand held
cordless drill (see Figure 29).
Figure 29: Drill press rig with cordless drill installed
Due to the varying total thickness of the chassis, a result of varying amounts of extra layers
of wet laid-up carbon fibre, inserts needed to be trimmed to a size specific to its location.
This was achieved by milling the insert down while being held by a custom jig. Once these
inserts were correctly sized, they were then cleaned with acetone and pressed into the
32. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 32
holes at the required locations. The inserts were then set into place by injecting epoxy resin
into the holes in the top of the inserts which were designed for this purpose.
6. Chassis Construction
The construction of the 2010 F-SAE chassis is based on the technique of “cutting and
folding” of flat honeycomb panels. “Cutting and folding” honeycomb panels involves the
removal of a strip of material from the inside of the bend to be formed. The panel is then
folded over to form the desired angle of bend and a reinforcing strip of material is added to
stiffen the bend (see Figure 30).
Figure 30: The "cut and fold" process
The size of the strip of material required to be removed from the skin of panel is
proportional to the size of the angle of the desired bend, and the thickness of the panel. The
width of the slot can be determined using the following equation.
Where Ѳ=angle of bend, S=slot width, and T=thickness of panel.
During the course of 2010, two mock-up chassis were built as well as the final chassis using
the “cut and fold” technique. The building of these chassis is discussed in more detail in the
following sections of this report.
33. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 33
Figure 31: The three monocoque chassis iterations
6.1 First Iteration
Early in 2010, before any composite material testing was carried out, the first of two mock
chassis was constructed. This chassis was made from aluminium panels and was made as a
“proof of concept” and was used to find out how well the “cut and fold” technique worked
in chassis construction. The chassis was hand routed and the inside of the folds were held
together by strips of aluminium sheet glued into place.
34. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 34
Figure 32: First chassis iteration
While this chassis is not made from materials that would stand up to use as a chassis, the
mock-up provided encouragement for the team and led to further investigation into
materials and manufacturing techniques. This mock-up proved that a chassis could be
constructed in this way in a short space of time, with this first iteration being completed
within two weeks (see Figure 32).
6.2 Second Iteration
After deciding to build the chassis from carbon fibre skinned panels, a second mock-chassis
was built to develop and test techniques to join this type of material together and to secure
the insides of folds. A technique also had to be developed to secure the front roll hoop
within the structure of the chassis.
35. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 35
Figure 33: Second chassis iteration
This second iteration mock chassis was constructed from 30mm thick aluminium skinned
panels (which are much cheaper than carbon fibre). The aluminium skinned composite
panels were CNC routed which provided a greater degree of dimensional accuracy over the
chassis and proved to be a quicker, more efficient method of cutting the shape of the flat
pattern for the chassis.
Before the construction of the second mock chassis began, it was decided that carbon fibre
skinned panels would be used for the final chassis. Techniques were therefore used to build
this mock-up that suited a carbon fibre structure. Rather than using strips of aluminium for
reinforcing the insides of the folds, multiple plies of wet laid-up carbon fibre were used over
an epoxy filler used to round off the corners of the folds.
The fillet of epoxy filler, which consists of epoxy resin mixed with “Q-Cell” (glass micro-
balloons), which was spread into place using a small piece of steel tube which has the
desired radius for the fillet. The radius for the fillet was around 20mm. For this mock-up, the
wet laid-up carbon fibre was pressed into place over the filler with plastic bags filled with
sand, which conforms to the profile of the inside of the fold and holds the fibres down while
curing.
The construction of this mock-up proved useful for practicing and developing techniques
used to reinforce folded joins and also served as a test for the process of CNC routing of the
flat pattern of the chassis. This mock-up also proved useful for the purpose of test fitting
components such as dampers, fuel tank, rear sub-frame, and other parts before fitting to
the final chassis (see Figure 33).
36. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 36
6.3 Final Chassis Construction
Figure 34: Final monocoque chassis
6.3.1CNC Routing
The preferred method decided upon for cutting out of the flat pattern of the chassis from
carbon fibre skinned honeycomb panels is CNC routing. This method proved to be the
fastest, most accurate technique of cutting the basic flat shape of the chassis and the slots
required for the various folds in the chassis. CNC routing is also a relatively cost effective
method of cutting the panels with a quote of $100 from one CNC routing company, however
the chassis was routed free of charge this year by a sponsor.
To get the panels routed, a .dxf electronic drawing needed to be produced. This was easily
produced from a Solidworks drawing of the flat chassis pattern (Figures 35 and 36). This flat
pattern was produced from creating a “sheet metal” part from a Solidworks solid body
(Figures 37 and 38).
37. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 37
Figure 35: Solidworks front chassis model
Figure 36: .DXF drawing of front chassis
38. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 38
Figure 37: CNC routed front chassis
Figure 38: Folded front chassis
39. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 39
6.3.2Adhesion of Folds
As the chassis was being folded up, filler needed to be applied to the insides of the folds to
provide initial stiffening of the bends and to form a corner radius which the carbon fibre
stiffener will readily conform to. The filler used for the final chassis construction was a
cotton “micro-fibre blend” which is added to epoxy resin. This filler is stronger and less
brittle than the “Q-Cell” filler used in the second mock-up chassis, although of a higher
density. This filler was applied using a piece of steel tube as a tool to spread the filler to the
required radius.
Figure 39: Folded, un-reinforced rear chassis
40. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 40
Figure 40: Epoxy filler application
41. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 41
Figure 41: Spreading epoxy filler
42. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 42
Figure 42: Completed epoxy filler fillet
After this filler was allowed to set, a two strips of 200gsm carbon fibre aligned at 90° to the
fold and one layer of carbon fibre aligned at 45° to the fold were applied to the inside of the
bend. These strips were approximately 140mm wide, and the fibre alignment corresponds
approximately to the alignment of the fibres in the chassis panels. These panels were then
pressed into place using a “vacuum bag” technique. This process involves a sealed bag being
constructed using a plastic film, which the air is drawn out of using a vacuum pump. This
allows atmospheric pressure to press against the bag to press the fibres down during the
cure process. A peel ply is used in the lay-up to soak up excess resin and to leave a seamless
finish with the chassis composite panels.
43. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 43
Figure 43: Diagram of carbon fibre wet lay-up of joins using a vacuum bag
Figure 44: Vacuum bagging front chassis folds
44. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 44
Minimal jigging was necessary to form the angles of the folds. However, care needed to be
taken in ensuring that the angles formed were correct. This was achieved through clamping
the panel to a table and securing the angles of the folds with a wooden jig and reinforced
tape. For a “one off” production this method worked well, but perhaps a more secure jig
would be required if a longer production run was ever produced of the chassis.
Figure 45: Folding rear of chassis with the aid of a wooden jig
45. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 45
Figure 46: Folded rear chassis
6.3.3 Front Roll Hoop Attachment
To comply with the 2010 F-SAE rules (SAE 2010) a front roll hoop is required to be included
in the composite monocoque structure. This roll hoop consists of a continuous section of
25.4mm x 2.4mm round steel tubing which extends from the lowest point on the chassis
within the plane of the hoop, up, over and down to the lowest point on the opposite side of
the chassis. The hoop is situated in the vicinity of the steering wheel and is between the
front and rear sections of the composite monocoque.
This roll hoop is attached by being included as an integral part of the monocoque layup. The
hoop was first adhered to the foot well section of the chassis using a filler consisting of
epoxy resin mixed with a cotton micro-fibre blend, the same filler used to fill the inside of
the chassis folds. To make the hoop fit between the layers of carbon fibre in the chassis
panels, some of the honeycomb core needed to be removed. After joining the hoop to the
front chassis section, the two halves of the chassis were brought together and glued
together using more epoxy filler.
46. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 46
Figure 47: Front roll hoop glued into front chassis before joining front to rear
When the two halves of the chassis were joined together, strips of carbon fibre were wet
laid-up over both sides of the join and vacuum bagged while curing. These strips of carbon
fibre were wider than the strips used to reinforce the folds of the chassis (approximately
200mm) and four plies were used rather than three. This was because this join between the
two halves of the chassis is a critical area and failure of this join would be catastrophic.
After the join between the two halves of the chassis was completed, layers of carbon fibre
were wrapped over the exposed section at the top of the hoop to make it a fully integrated
part of the chassis structure.
6.3.4 Cockpit Closeouts
Edges of the composite panels which are untreated and left as exposed aluminium
honeycomb are unsightly and leave sharp edges which are easily damaged. To finish the
exposed panel edges around the cockpit opening, a method of closing out these edges was
required. After trials of bent aluminium strips, it was decided that rounded strips of balsa
wood would be glued to the edges of the cockpit opening with a strengthening layer of fibre
47. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 47
glass wet laid-up over the top of the wood. This method provides a satisfactory finish to the
edges which is both lightweight and relatively durable.
Figure 48: Balsa wood edge close-outs on mock chassis
48. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 48
Figure 49: Finished edge closeouts on final chassis
7. Future Recommendations
To improve the design of this chassis in future years, there are a number of areas that can
possibly be addressed. Most of the areas of improvement are focussed on reducing the
weight of the chassis by taking out unnecessary material and strength from the chassis.
More material testing, strategic carbon fibre lay-up, more insert testing, improved rear
chassis design, and pre-positioning of inserts is recommended for future development of
the 2010 chassis. It is also recommended that physical testing be carried out on the folding
and joining techniques for confirmation of their strength.
More physical testing of baseline side impact steel tube is recommended in future years so
that more relevant stiffness values can be used for comparison to composite panels. This
may enable less plies of carbon fibre to be used in the composite lay-up, saving weight. Also,
49. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 49
further composite material testing with uni-directional carbon fibre aligned in specific
directions to gain the required strength and stiffness from the panels may be an option
which could reduce the weight of the chassis in future years. The front foot-well section of
the 2010 chassis is constructed from the same composite panels as the side impact zone.
Reducing the number of carbon fibre plies in this area where the added strength is not
required is a good place to begin reducing the weight of the chassis.
Due to the removal of honeycomb core around inserts, the volume of epoxy resin around
the inserts adds significant weight to the chassis. Further testing is required on inserts to
find out precisely how much core needs to be removed around the inserts. Reducing this
amount of resin to a minimum can save up to 40g per insert with assurance that strength is
not excessively compromised.
To make the attachment of the rear sub-frame easier, it is recommended that in future
another fold is introduced to the side of the side impact zone of the chassis so that the angle
of the rear corners of the chassis makes 90° where the main roll hoop is attached. This fold
would make the chassis thinner in the main roll hoop area and currently wasted space
would be removed from this area.
To improve ease and accuracy of positioning of components, particularly suspension
components, these holes could be positioned at the CNC routing stage of construction and
inserts installed before the chassis is folded. This technique would ensure accuracy of these
positions and provide a method of attaching the chassis to a jig for the folding stage of the
chassis construction.
8. Conclusion
Through the process of designing testing and building the 2010 F-SAE chassis a method of
building a composite monocoque chassis has been developed which is well suited to
Formula SAE. This technique of building a “cut and folded” composite monocoque chassis
provides high levels of strength and stiffness performance, is light weight and can be
relatively easily constructed by students without the need for specialised machinery or
tooling. Although this process is relatively simple compared to alternative composite
construction techniques, a high level of build quality and performance can be achieved with
less time and money spent on the chassis. This construction technique is also less prone to
manufacturing defects than other methods, as the composite panels which the chassis is
made from come from an external supplier.
50. Design and Construction of Formula SAE
Composite Chassis 2010
2010
Page | 50
The chassis made in 2010 should provide a concept which can be refined in future years to
reduce of the weight, and resolve some of the difficulties in the manufacturing process.
Through
9. References
Ayres Composite Panels, n.d., Products, retrieved October, 20, 2009, from
http://www.ayrescom.com/products/default.asp
Budynas R.G., & Nisbett, J.K. (2008). Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design. 8th
Ed.
McGraw-Hill: New York.
Callister, W.D. (2007). Material Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 7th
Ed. Wiley: New
York.
Edgar Julian, AutoSpeed.com.au, (February, 3, 2009), Building an Ultra Light-Weight Car,
retrieved August, 10, 2009, from http://autospeed.com.au/cms/A_110989/article.html
Haywood, M.A. (2003). Design and Construction of a Carbon Composite Monocoque Chassis
for the 2003 UWA FSAE Car. UWA Honours Thesis.
HexWeb™ Honeycomb Attributes and Properties: A comprehensive guide to standard Hexcel
honeycomb materials, configurations, and mechanical properties
http://www.hexcel.com/NR/rdonlyres/599A3453-316D-46D6-9AEE-
C337D8B547CA/0/HexwebAttributesandProperties.pdf cited on the 1/11/2010.
Pashley. T. (2008). How To Build Motorcycle-Engined Racing Cars. England: Veloce
Publishing
Society of Automotive Engineers, 2010 Formula SAE Rules.
(SAE 2010)