SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Final Cut Audience Feedback
Excellent Good    OK     Poor   Very
                                           poor
Mise en             yes
scene
Camera              yes
work
Editing    yes
Sound                        yes

            Excellent Good    OK    Poor   Very
                                           poor
 Mise en                      yes
 scene
 Camera                       yes
 work
 Editing             yes
 Sound               yes
Excellent Good   OK    Poor   Very
                                        poor
Mise en            yes
scene
Camera             yes
work
Editing                    yes
Sound                      yes

          Excellent Good   OK    Poor   Very
                                        poor
Mise en                    yes
scene
Camera                     yes
work
Editing            yes
Sound                      yes
Strengths
- Editing was good, use of green screen and the
  static effect of the screen going fuzzy.
- The effects are very good and fit in with the film
- The news report was really good
- The editing of the news flash was really good and
  useful
- The idea was good which automatically shows it
  is a thriller, the editing was good, especially the
  news reporting.
Weaknesses
- The titles don’t have second names just first
   names so it looks unproffesional, sound could
   improve to build up tension
- There is not enough sound so it is not as
   effective
- The title was cut out too early , didn’t get
enough time to read it , it was a little too short
and could be extended and it did not say the
producers name.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Task 1 media evalution
Task 1 media evalutionTask 1 media evalution
Task 1 media evalutionMegan Harding
 
Planul - proiect de dezvoltare a CNE
Planul - proiect de dezvoltare a CNEPlanul - proiect de dezvoltare a CNE
Planul - proiect de dezvoltare a CNE
Teodor_Blidaru
 
Banaue tour packages
Banaue tour packagesBanaue tour packages
Banaue tour packages
Denwil Batangog
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Task 1 media evalution
Task 1 media evalutionTask 1 media evalution
Task 1 media evalution
 
Task 4 evalutation
Task 4 evalutationTask 4 evalutation
Task 4 evalutation
 
Planul - proiect de dezvoltare a CNE
Planul - proiect de dezvoltare a CNEPlanul - proiect de dezvoltare a CNE
Planul - proiect de dezvoltare a CNE
 
Task 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluationTask 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluation
 
Task 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluationTask 3 evaluation
Task 3 evaluation
 
Slide share
Slide shareSlide share
Slide share
 
Banaue tour packages
Banaue tour packagesBanaue tour packages
Banaue tour packages
 

Similar to Final audince evultion media

Feedback
FeedbackFeedback
Feedback
Ts6078
 
Prelim evaluation
Prelim evaluationPrelim evaluation
Prelim evaluation
Joe Toyer
 
Audience feedback
Audience feedbackAudience feedback
Audience feedbackjoshd101
 
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7jacobseston
 
Survey feedback
Survey feedbackSurvey feedback
Survey feedbackgroup025
 
Media evaluation
Media evaluationMedia evaluation
Media evaluation
ElliotLaville23
 
Areas of improvement
Areas of improvementAreas of improvement
Areas of improvement
sandruruben
 
Preliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationPreliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationJoshgeeves
 
Preliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationPreliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationJoshgeeves
 
Audience research on first draft of the video
Audience research on first draft of the videoAudience research on first draft of the video
Audience research on first draft of the videogusmcc09
 
Unit 5 feedback
Unit 5   feedbackUnit 5   feedback
Unit 5 feedback
benzibob1234
 
Preliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationPreliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationLiambest34
 
Feedback on Silence (rough cut)
Feedback on Silence (rough cut)Feedback on Silence (rough cut)
Feedback on Silence (rough cut)AmyRyckaert
 
Evaluation of practise task
Evaluation of practise taskEvaluation of practise task
Evaluation of practise taskabbielliott
 
Ig3 evaluation on keepsake
Ig3 evaluation on keepsakeIg3 evaluation on keepsake
Ig3 evaluation on keepsakeCarrie Deans
 
Preliminary Task Presentation
Preliminary Task PresentationPreliminary Task Presentation
Preliminary Task Presentation
Bret Newman
 
Analysing preliminary lip synching task new changes
Analysing preliminary lip synching task new changesAnalysing preliminary lip synching task new changes
Analysing preliminary lip synching task new changesLiatShamash
 
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7
Albert Goodchild
 

Similar to Final audince evultion media (20)

Feedback
FeedbackFeedback
Feedback
 
Prelim evaluation
Prelim evaluationPrelim evaluation
Prelim evaluation
 
Audience feedback
Audience feedbackAudience feedback
Audience feedback
 
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7
 
Survey feedback
Survey feedbackSurvey feedback
Survey feedback
 
Media evaluation
Media evaluationMedia evaluation
Media evaluation
 
Areas of improvement
Areas of improvementAreas of improvement
Areas of improvement
 
Preliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationPreliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluation
 
Preliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationPreliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluation
 
Audience research on first draft of the video
Audience research on first draft of the videoAudience research on first draft of the video
Audience research on first draft of the video
 
Unit 5 feedback
Unit 5   feedbackUnit 5   feedback
Unit 5 feedback
 
Preliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluationPreliminary task evaluation
Preliminary task evaluation
 
Feedback on Silence (rough cut)
Feedback on Silence (rough cut)Feedback on Silence (rough cut)
Feedback on Silence (rough cut)
 
Evaluation of practise task
Evaluation of practise taskEvaluation of practise task
Evaluation of practise task
 
Q6
Q6Q6
Q6
 
Q3
Q3Q3
Q3
 
Ig3 evaluation on keepsake
Ig3 evaluation on keepsakeIg3 evaluation on keepsake
Ig3 evaluation on keepsake
 
Preliminary Task Presentation
Preliminary Task PresentationPreliminary Task Presentation
Preliminary Task Presentation
 
Analysing preliminary lip synching task new changes
Analysing preliminary lip synching task new changesAnalysing preliminary lip synching task new changes
Analysing preliminary lip synching task new changes
 
Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7Evaluation question 7
Evaluation question 7
 

More from Megan Harding

Task 1 media evalution
Task 1 media evalutionTask 1 media evalution
Task 1 media evalutionMegan Harding
 

More from Megan Harding (8)

Evaluation 4
Evaluation 4Evaluation 4
Evaluation 4
 
Evaluation 2 media
Evaluation 2 mediaEvaluation 2 media
Evaluation 2 media
 
Recovered file 1
Recovered file 1Recovered file 1
Recovered file 1
 
Presentation2
Presentation2Presentation2
Presentation2
 
Presentation3
Presentation3Presentation3
Presentation3
 
Poster analysis
Poster analysisPoster analysis
Poster analysis
 
Task 6 evaulation
Task 6 evaulationTask 6 evaulation
Task 6 evaulation
 
Task 1 media evalution
Task 1 media evalutionTask 1 media evalution
Task 1 media evalution
 

Final audince evultion media

  • 2. Excellent Good OK Poor Very poor Mise en yes scene Camera yes work Editing yes Sound yes Excellent Good OK Poor Very poor Mise en yes scene Camera yes work Editing yes Sound yes
  • 3. Excellent Good OK Poor Very poor Mise en yes scene Camera yes work Editing yes Sound yes Excellent Good OK Poor Very poor Mise en yes scene Camera yes work Editing yes Sound yes
  • 4. Strengths - Editing was good, use of green screen and the static effect of the screen going fuzzy. - The effects are very good and fit in with the film - The news report was really good - The editing of the news flash was really good and useful - The idea was good which automatically shows it is a thriller, the editing was good, especially the news reporting.
  • 5. Weaknesses - The titles don’t have second names just first names so it looks unproffesional, sound could improve to build up tension - There is not enough sound so it is not as effective - The title was cut out too early , didn’t get enough time to read it , it was a little too short and could be extended and it did not say the producers name.