This document contains the results of a survey about a music video. Overall, the feedback was overwhelmingly positive. Respondents enjoyed the video and felt it met expectations in terms of quality, aesthetics, content, and genre conventions. A few suggestions for improvements were made, such as adding more cinematography or featuring certain aspects more frequently. However, many said they didn't know how it could be improved. The survey results indicate that the video was largely successful at appealing to its intended teenage audience.

1. FINAL FEEDBACK/ POST
PRODUCTION
(MUSIC VIDEO)

2. Q1
• Generally, a very positive
result showing that my
target audience enjoyed
my video, critical for any
product or media text to
be successful.

3. Q2
• Another general overview of
the audiences ideas of
quality.
• Generally a positive
outcome is seen here, with
the exception of one
respondent who voted
neutrally. Reasoning for this
should be stated within the
improvements question later
in this survey.

4. Q3
• Again a generally positive piece
of feedback.
• This quality is particularly
important for the success of any
media product, however
through conventions this can be
limited, categorising the
purpose of the product while
meeting an audiences standard
expectations.
• With regards to the neutral
voter, hopefully reasoning/
advice will be stated in the
improvements section, inducing
knowledge of potential
improvements.

5. Q4
• An extremely positive result
given here; my
concentration directed
towards aesthetics resulted
in a certain appeal
recognised by my
audience, and therefore it
can be said that this
element of my product was
successful.

6. Q5
“WHAT DO YOU
LIKE MOST ABOUT
THE VIDEO?”
• The positive remarks
received here display
success within stylistic
qualities, content,
editorial methods and
inclusion of signified
meaning. Due to the
fact my target
audience have
recognised these
aspects displays a
certain success.

7. Q6
• Again, another piece
of positive feedback
showing that my
audience research has
been effective when
targeting my product.
(See above)
• The least satisfied
respondent will
hopefully leave
feedback as to why
later within the survey,
making me aware of
potential
improvements.

8. Q7
• This positive feedback
appears centred around
signified meaning and
representation of escapism
reflecting understanding
of this from the audience.
Additionally, the way in
which this has been
portrayed has been
realised, reflecting upon
engagement and editorial
success.
“WHAT DOES THIS
PRODUCT DO
REALLY WELL?”

9. Q8
• Again, a positive response
is seen here reflecting
upon conventional success
with regards to audience
expectations and their
individual needs.
• Additionally, proof that
genre conventions have
been studied and
considered when making
choices for my product is
evident here through
feedback; stating that the
imagery seen within the
outcome is relative to
expected indie-pop
conventions, targeted
towards teenagers.

10. Q9
• Many of these responses state that
they don’t know how the product
could be improved reflecting upon the
true success of the outcome.
• Those which suggest amendments
suggest cinematographic additions
and more frequent feature of certain
aspects. If I were to re-edit this
product I would consider this
research, however as a final outcome
it is apparent that it is successful as it
is.
• With regards to the quality comment,
occasionally the video takes a while to
load and play in its maximum quality,
but this is not often and with the help
of supporting staff, I couldn’t work out
why this happened when it was played
on YouTube.
“WHAT CHANGES WOULD MOST
IMPROVE THE VIDEO?”

11. Q10
• This diagram summarising
my results concludes the
total success of my product,
inferring that a great
majority of people
subconsciously approved the
product as having met real
media set standards and
expectations. This shows that
conventional approach has
been followed where the
audiences wants and
expectations have been
considered to ensure that
the product appeals to this
intentional target audience.