Measuring Farmland Biodiversity
Rhett D Harrison
r.harrison@cgiar.org
Background
●
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment estimated
that 60% of ecosystem services were impaired
●
Over 20% of agricultural land globally (40% in
sub-Saharan Africa) is degraded
●
Agricultural expansion is a major driver of
biodiversity loss
●
Deforestation and land-use change account for
~20% of CO2 emissions
(often ~80% in developing countries)
Farmland Biodiversity
●
Benefits of biodiversity dependent on
abundance, diversity and distribution
●
High spatial variability makes assessment
challenging
●
Management requires fine grain, easy-to-
update information on social outcomes, land
health, carbon and biodiversity
Landscape Protocols
●
Landscape scale
assessment of biodiversity
●
Basic protocols
– Land-cover (coverage)
– Trees (1 ha circular plots)
– Birds (30 m radius point counts)
– Modeling of RS data with ground
calibration
●
Optional protocols
– Linear tree features
– Pollinators
– Natural enemies
– Soil organisms
Landscape Protocols
Prediction
MDS2
MDS1
           
           
           
           
           
           
Axis 1: r2 = 0.80
Axis 2: r2 = 0.52
r2 = 0.75
TonF Biomass TonF Composition
TonF vs Biodiversity
Next steps
●
Landscape factors
●
Multispecies modeling
Problems
●
Land use not random
●
Extinction debt
●
Other drivers of BioD loss
(e.g. hunting; pesticides)
Farmland BioD Score
●
Biomass correlates with abundance and
size of TonF (a)
●
Spectral Diversity to assess diversity (b)
●
Weigh scores by neighbourhood (c)
●
Weigh scores by slope and proximity to
streams / rivers (d)
●
FBS = (a + b)cd (~100 m pixel scale)

Farmland Biodiversity

  • 1.
    Measuring Farmland Biodiversity RhettD Harrison r.harrison@cgiar.org
  • 2.
    Background ● Millennium Ecosystem Assessmentestimated that 60% of ecosystem services were impaired ● Over 20% of agricultural land globally (40% in sub-Saharan Africa) is degraded ● Agricultural expansion is a major driver of biodiversity loss ● Deforestation and land-use change account for ~20% of CO2 emissions (often ~80% in developing countries)
  • 3.
    Farmland Biodiversity ● Benefits ofbiodiversity dependent on abundance, diversity and distribution ● High spatial variability makes assessment challenging ● Management requires fine grain, easy-to- update information on social outcomes, land health, carbon and biodiversity
  • 4.
    Landscape Protocols ● Landscape scale assessmentof biodiversity ● Basic protocols – Land-cover (coverage) – Trees (1 ha circular plots) – Birds (30 m radius point counts) – Modeling of RS data with ground calibration
  • 5.
    ● Optional protocols – Lineartree features – Pollinators – Natural enemies – Soil organisms Landscape Protocols
  • 6.
    Prediction MDS2 MDS1                                                                        Axis 1: r2 = 0.80 Axis 2: r2 = 0.52 r2 = 0.75 TonF Biomass TonF Composition
  • 7.
    TonF vs Biodiversity Nextsteps ● Landscape factors ● Multispecies modeling Problems ● Land use not random ● Extinction debt ● Other drivers of BioD loss (e.g. hunting; pesticides)
  • 8.
    Farmland BioD Score ● Biomasscorrelates with abundance and size of TonF (a) ● Spectral Diversity to assess diversity (b) ● Weigh scores by neighbourhood (c) ● Weigh scores by slope and proximity to streams / rivers (d) ● FBS = (a + b)cd (~100 m pixel scale)