The document is a questionnaire evaluating a course titled "Managing Human Capital" taught by Muhammad Farhan. It contains responses from 32 students. Overall, the majority of students rated the lecturer and course positively. 96% said the lecturer was always on time, 78% felt the lectures were well organized, and 70% thought the lecturer had very sound command over the subject matter. For the course, 70% found it applicable and contemporary. 81% felt assignments positively affected their learning. The majority of students devoted 3-7 hours per week to the subject and studied it weekly.

1. FES Report 1 Date of Issue: 29 October 2016 at 23:01 PM
Institute of Business Management (IoBM)
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR EVALUATION - Summer-2016
Course Name (Code): MANAGING HUMAN CAPITAL (HRM- 410 Y) 1679 No. of Students: 32
Faculty Name (Code): Muhammad Farhan (80000001437) No. of Sheets: 27
1-The Lecturer A% B% C% D% E%
1. Is the lecturer on time for the class? Always 96.29 Frequently 3.70 Occasionally 0.00 Rarely 0.00 Never 0.00
2. Did the lectures seem well organized? Yes 77.77 Mostly 22.22 Partly 0.00 No 0.00 Not at all 0.00
3. How was the lecturers command over subject matter? Very sound 70.37 Sound 29.62 Mediocre 0.00 Weak 0.00 Very weak 0.00
4. How was the pace for the assimilation of concepts? Very brisk 29.62 Brisk 37.03 Reasonable 33.33 Slow 0.00 Very slow 0.00
5. Was the lecturers speech audible? Yes 77.77 Somewhat 22.22 Audible at the
front only
0.00 No 0.00 Not at all 0.00
6. Were the lecturers writing/slides neat and legible? Yes 92.59 Somewhat 7.40 Unintelligible from
the back
0.00 No 0.00 Not at all 0.00
7. Do you feel comfortable with the communication skills of the faculty? Yes 85.18 Satisfactory 14.81 Somewhat 0.00 No 0.00 Not at all 0.00
8. Did you understand most of the lecture in class? Yes 66.66 Mostly 33.33 Partly 0.00 No 0.00 Not at all 0.00
9. Did the lecturer generate your interest in the subject? Yes 62.96 Mostly 29.62 Partly 7.40 No 0.00 Not at all 0.00
10. How was the state of class discipline during the lectures? Very good 48.14 Good 48.14 Satisfactory 3.70 Noisy 0.00 Rowdy 0.00
11. How do you feel about the lecturers grading? Very Tough 11.11 Tough 14.81 Reasonable 40.74 Fair 33.33 Lenient 0.00
12. Overall, how do you rate your lecturer? Very good 70.37 Good 29.62 Fine 0.00 Tolerable 0.00 Poor 0.00
2-The Course A% B% C% D% E%
13. How would you classify the contents of the course outline? Contemporary 29.62 Applicable 70.37 Ordinary 0.00 Irrelevant 0.00 Obsolete 0.00
14. What is your estimation of the course coverage? More than enough 22.22 Enough 74.07 Average 3.70 Thin 0.00 Very thin 0.00
15. What has been your general feeling about exam questions? Conceptual 44.44 Tested memory only 3.70 Mixture of a& b 51.85 Theoretical 0.00 Irrelevant to
course outline
0.00
16. How did assignments affect your learning process? Explicity 11.11 Positively 81.48 Adequately 7.40 Marginally 0.00 No effect 0.00
17. The amount of practical work (projects, labs, reports etc) was? Highly sufficient 29.62 Sufficient 70.37 Insufficient 0.00 Unmanageable 0.00 Highly
unmanageable
0.00
18. From a professional viewpoint, you think the course was? Valuable 37.03 Very helpful 44.44 Helpful 18.51 Not sure 0.00 Insignificant 0.00
3-The Student A% B% C% D% E%
19. How many hours per week you devoted to the subject? More than 7 hrs 7.40 Almost 7 hrs 11.11 Between 3 & 7
hrs
40.74 Almost 3 hrs 25.92 Less than 3 hrs 14.81
20. How often did you study the subject? Daily 11.11 Weekly 74.07 Monthly 14.81 Only before the
final
0.00 I did not study at
all
0.00
21. You rate your understanding of the subject matter as? Comprehensive 44.44 Adequate 48.14 Partial 7.40 Weak 0.00 Very weak 0.00
Total: 48.85 36.68 10.93 2.82 0.71