This document is an internship evaluation form for a student named Nico Dautzenberg who interned at Sworddfish Group from April 4th to May 4th. The student's mentor, Alexander Fröhlich, is filling out the form to provide feedback on Nico's performance in areas like attitude towards work, knowledge, and social skills. The form uses a 5-point scale to rate different aspects of Nico's internship and requests examples to support any weak scores.

1.
INTERNSHIP
EVALUATION
This
performance
review
should
take
place
during
the
last
week
of
the
work
placement.
The
student’s
mentor
should
fill
out
this
questionnaire.
Preferably,
the
mentor
should
also
give
direct
feedback
to
the
student.
We
thank
you
for
your
valuable
feedback.
Company
name:
Sworddfish
Group
Student’s
mentor:
Alexander
Fröhlich
Function:
Managing
Director
Phone:
+49
173
9244298
E-­‐mail
address:
alexander.froelich@sworddfish.de
Student
name:
Nico
Dautzenberg
UIBS
ID:
UIBS
00795,
Madrid
E-­‐mail
address:
n.dautzenberg@web.de
Campus:
Choose
a
campus
Internship
start
date:
4th
of
April
Internship
end
date:
4th
of
May
Date
of
the
evaluation:
3rd
of
May
If
different
from
the
information
mentioned
in
the
Internship
Agreement,
please
answer
following
questions:
During
the
internship,
the
Student
will
have
following
primary
job
duties
and
responsibilities:
-­‐
player
recruitment
-­‐
career
advice
-­‐
player
marketing
-­‐
player's
public
relation
-­‐
Analysis
of
other
Companies
and
Players
For
such
function,
the
Company
normally
hires
an
employee
of
the
following
level:
-­‐
An
individual
with
professional
writing
and
speaking
skills
in
German
and
English
-­‐
Great
interest
and
knowledge
about
football

2.
For
the
next
questions,
please
indicate
on
a
5-­‐point
scale
up
to
which
extent
you
agree
with
the
following
statements:
1:
fully
disagree
2:
disagree
3:
agree
4:
fully
agree
5:
impossible
to
assess

3.
3
1.
Attitude
towards
work
1.1 The
student
is
punctual.
1
2
3
4
5
1.2 The
student
makes
proposals
about
new
assignments
and
does
not
wait
until
being
told
what
to
do.
1
2
3
4
5
1.3 The
student
is
able
to
work
in
a
problem-­‐solving
way.
1
2
3
4
5
1.4 The
student
takes
initiative
and
does
not
only
perform
what
she/he
is
told
to
do.
1
2
3
4
5
1.5 The
student
works
meticulously.
1
2
3
4
5
1.6 The
student
is
able
to
work
in
team.
1
2
3
4
5
1.7 The
student
is
self-­‐critical.
1
2
3
4
5
1.8 The
student
is
eager
to
learn.
1
2
3
4
5
1.9 The
student
is
able
to
acquire
new
knowledge
quickly
and
can
adapt
her/his
own
work
method
accordingly.
1
2
3
4
5
1.10 The
student
considers
criticism
as
an
incentive
for
improvement.
1
2
3
4
5
Please
provide
examples
for
weak
scores
(1
and
2)
about
attitude
towards
work.
Click
here
to
enter
text.

4.
4
2.
Knowledge
2.1
The
student’s
level
of
general
knowledge
is
satisfactory.
1
2
3
4
5
2.2
The
active
knowledge
(both
spoken
and
written)
of
foreign
languages
is
satisfactory.
1
2
3
4
5
2.3
The
passive
knowledge
of
foreign
languages
is
satisfactory.
1
2
3
4
5
2.4
The
student’s
ICT-­‐knowledge
is
satisfactory.
1
2
3
4
5
Please
provide
examples
for
weak
scores
(1
and
2)
about
knowledge.
Click
here
to
enter
text.
2.5
How
do
you
assess
the
student’s
level
of
knowledge?
very
weak
/
weak
/
standard/
good
/
very
good
/
impossible
to
assess
If
very
weak
or
weak:
which
knowledge
is
lacking
in
your
opinion?
Click
here
to
enter
text.

5.
5
3.
Social
skills
3.1
The
student
does
not
unnecessarily
antagonize
people.
1
2
3
4
5
3.2
The
student
respects
company
culture
and
the
common
code
of
conduct.
1
2
3
4
5
3.3
The
student
is
assertive.
1
2
3
4
5
3.4
The
student
is
empathetic.
1
2
3
4
5
3.5
The
student
is
enthusiast
to
work
at
your
Company.
1
2
3
4
5
Please
detail
weak
scores
(1
and
2)
about
social
skills.
Click
here
to
enter
text.
3.6
How
do
you
generally
assess
the
student’s
social
skills?
very
weak
/
weak
/
standard/
good
/
very
good
/
impossible
to
assess
If
very
weak
or
weak:
which
social
skills
are
lacking
in
your
opinion?
Click
here
to
enter
text.

6.
6
4.
How
do
you
generally
assess
the
student’s
communicative
skills?
very
weak/
weak
/
standard/
good
/
very
good
/
impossible
to
assess
If
very
weak
or
weak:
which
communicative
skills
are
lacking
in
your
opinion?
Click
here
to
enter
text.
5.
How
do
you
generally
assess
the
student’s
analytical
skills?
(problem
analysis,
problem-­‐
solving
work,
figure
analysis)
very
weak
/
weak
/
standard/
good
/
very
good
/
impossible
to
assess
If
very
weak
or
weak:
in
which
areas
does
the
student
perform
unsatisfactorily?
Click
here
to
enter
text.
6.
Does
the
student
show
the
right
attitude
to
perform
well
in
your
company?
YES
NO
Which
attitudes
are
important
in
your
opinion?
Click
here
to
enter
text.

7.
7
7.
What
is
your
overall
assessment
of
the
student’s
practical
training?
1.
The
student
performs
excellently
at
all
levels
2.
The
student
performs
better
than
expected
3.
The
student
meets
expectations
4.
The
student
does
not
meet
expectations
and
performs
unsatisfactorily
at
several
levels
5.
The
student
does
not
meet
expectations
and
performs
unsatisfactorily
at
all
levels
7.6.
Would
you
consider
offering
a
job
placement
to
the
student
after
his
or
her
graduation?
YES
NO
Feel
free
to
add
any
other
remarks
about
the
student.
Click
here
to
enter
text.
8.
Would
you
be
prepared
to
offer
work
placement
to
UIBS
students
in
the
future?
YES
NO
If
yes,
who
should
we
contact
in
your
company?
Name:
Click
here
to
enter
text.
Function:
Click
here
to
enter
text.
Telephone:
Click
here
to
enter
text.
E-­‐mail:
Click
here
to
enter
text.
Feel
free
to
add
any
other
remarks
about
the
work
placement
of
students.
Click
here
to
enter
text.