It is a presentation of software engineering project which have the student feedback form to evaluate the information gathering, work analysis and management as well they software is go through all the aspect .

1. ABDULLAH ZAFAR (B1310001)
MAHIN AHMED (B1310048)
SAQIB AHMED (B13101121)
SYED MOHAMMED AFFAN AZEEM (B13101145)
SYED MOHAMMED BILAL IMAM (B13101148)

2. 1. INTRODUCTION
2. REQUIREMENT GATHERING
3. SOFTWAREMODEL USED
4. UML USE CASE AND NETWORK DIAGRAM
5. GANTT CHART AND PERT CHART
6. USES OF TEACHER EVALUATION FORM
7. UNIVERSITIES USING TEF

3. The teacher evaluation form is a software capable of teacher's assessment on the
basis of their skills . Multiple questions are to be answered in order to evaluate
the performance, the teacher can be ranked by student that is then reviewed by
the administration and teachers. The software is a password protected and
thereby can be reviewed by restricted personals only. The software is maintained
using database(MySQL with wamp server 2.0) and netbeans is used as backend
language for creating software.

4. • THE SYSTEM SHOULD EVALUATE THE
PERFORMANCE OF TEACHER.
REQUIREMENT
ANALYSIS
• MULTIPLE QUESTIONS WILL BE
ASKED IN THE FORM THAT WILL BE
ANSWERED BY THE STUDENT.
• THE SYSTEM SHOULD HAVE
LIMITED ACCESS TO THE
PERSONALS.
• EACH AND EVERY STUDENT WILL
HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT
THAT WILL BE PASSWORD
PROTECTED
• THE SYSTEM SHOULD HAVE
THE AVERAGE CURRENT
ASSESTMENT OF TEACHERS
• DATABASE WILL BE USED AS AN
INTERFACE THAT WILL UPDATE ALL
THE INFORMATION REGARDING
RATINGS.
• IF THE ASSESTMENT OF ANY
TEACHER IS BELOW 5 OUT OF
10 NOTIFY THAT TEACHER
• A METHOD OF NOTIFY( ) WILL BE
USED THAT WILL NOTIFY THE
TEACHER ON THE RESPECTIVE
CONDITIONS.

5. THE SOFTWARE HAS BEEN CREATED USING “ITERATIVE MODEL”
BECAUSE THE SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR THEY KEEP ON
CHANGING RAPIDLY AS TEACHERS JOINS OR LEAVES THE
DEPARTMENT. MOREOVER, THE CHANGES ARE EASY TO BE MADE AS
IT WORKS ITERATIVELY AND UPON EACH ITERATION A NEW VERSION
OF WORKABLE SOFTWARE IS DEVELOPED. TESTING
AND DEBUGGING
IS EASIER . ERRORS
CAN BE DETECTED
AT EARLIER
STAGES.

6. TEACHER’S EVALUATION FORM
TEACHER’S NAME: ____________________
TITLE NO: ________ COUSRE NO: ______
SEMESTER: _______ DEGREE : __________
Q1. The Instructor is prepared for each class /10
O2. The Instructor demonstrates knowledge
of the subject /10
Q3. The Instructor arrives on time /10
Q4. The Instructor leaves on time /10
Q5. The Instructor is fair in examination /10
Q6. The course material is modern and updated /10
Q7. The Instructor shows respect towards
students and encourages class participation /10
Q8. The Instructor returns the graded scripts etc.
in a reasonable amount of time /10

7. TEACHER’S EVALUATION FORM
TEACHER’S NAME: ____________________
TITLE NO: ________ COUSRE NO: ______
SEMESTER: _______ DEGREE : __________
Q1. The Instructor is prepared for each class /10
O2. The Instructor demonstrates knowledge
of the subject /10
Q3. The Instructor arrives on time /10
Q4. The Instructor leaves on time /10
Q5. The Instructor is fair in examination /10
Q6. The course material is modern and updated /10
Q7. The Instructor shows respect towards
students and encourages class participation /10
Q8. The Instructor returns the graded scripts etc.
in a reasonable amount of time /10

8. TEACHER’S EVALUATION FORM
TEACHER’S NAME: ____________________
TITLE NO: ________ COUSRE NO: ______
SEMESTER: _______ DEGREE : __________
Q1. The Instructor is prepared for each class /10
O2. The Instructor demonstrates knowledge
of the subject /10
Q3. The Instructor arrives on time /10
Q4. The Instructor leaves on time /10
Q5. The Instructor is fair in examination /10
Q6. The course material is modern and updated /10
Q7. The Instructor shows respect towards
students and encourages class participation /10
Q8. The Instructor returns the graded scripts etc.
in a reasonable amount of time /10
SUBMIT

9. REQUIREMENT GATHERING :(4 DAYS) INFORMATION RELATEDTO DEPARTMENT.
PHASE #01: (2 DAYS) REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS, SORTS OUT THE MOST IMPORTANT
INFORMATION.
PHASE#02: (3 DAYS) IMPLEMETATION ; CODINGTHE SOFTWARE
PHASE#03: (3 DAYS) TESTING; UNITTESTING AFTER A CHUNK OF CODE IS
COMPLETED
INTEGRATION: (1 DAYS)WHENTHE USER IS SATISFIED FROMTHE SOFTWARE, ALLTHE PARTS
OF CODE ARE INTEGRATEDTHAT IS SUMMED UPTOGETHER.
DELOPYMENT : (1 DAYS) THE SYSTEM IS DELIVEREDTOTHE USER.

11. STUDENT
ADMINISTRATION
TEACHER
LOGIN STD
LOGIN ADMIN
LOGIN
TEACHER
DATABASE
FILLINGTEF
RESULTSTEF
NOTIFICATIONS

12. TEACHERDATABASE ADMINISTRATIONSTUDENT
FILLED FORM
NOTIFIES USER
UPDATE REC.
RECORD
UPDATED
IF [RATE < 5]
SEND
NOTIFICATION

14. SCREEN # 1:
USER :
PASSWORD:
AFFAN
*********
ENTER

15. TEACHER’S EVALUATION FORM
TEACHER’S NAME: SIRASIM
TITLE NAME: BUSINESSCOMMUNICATION COUSRE NO: 406
SEMESTER: 4TH DEGREE : BS
Q1. The Instructor is prepared for each class 9/10
O2. The Instructor demonstrates knowledge
of the subject 9/10
Q3. The Instructor arrives on time 7/10
Q4. The Instructor leaves on time 9 /10
Q5. The Instructor is fair in examination 9 /10
Q6. The course material is modern and updated 10 /10
Q7. The Instructor shows respect towards
students and encourages class participation 10 /10
Q8. The Instructor returns the graded scripts etc.
in a reasonable amount of time 9/10
SUBMIT

16. STUDENT’S NAME: SEAT NO:
TEACHER’S NAME : COURSE NO:
AVERAGE:
STATUS :
AFFAN B13101145
SIR ASIM 406
1 9 10 GOOD
2 9 10 GOOD
3 7 10 FAIR
4 9 10 GOOD
5 9 10 GOOD
6 10 10 EXCELLENT
7 10 10 EXCELLENT
8 9 10 GOOD
9
GOOD
UPDATE
DELETE
NOTIFY
UPDATE

17. TEACHER’S EVALUATING FORM
OK
CONGRATULATIONS! YOUR PERFORMANCE IS
CONSISTENTLY GOOD.YOUR SKILLSARE HIGHLY
APPRECIATED. GOOD LUCK!

18.  HELPS IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE STUDENT IS
ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE CONTENTS TAUGHT BY
TEACHER.
 EVALUATORS UNDERSTAND THE DIFFICULTIES
INVOLVED IN TEACHING.
 FEEDBACK TO TEACHER CAN BE IMMEDIATE AND
EXCELLENT
 EVALUATORS CAN THEMSELVES LEARN TEACHING
TECHNIQUES FROM THOSE BEING EVALUATED.

19.  BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY, MASSACHUSETTS
 STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY, NEW YORK
 MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY, VIRGINIA
 INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, MALAYSIA