Focusing a Mineral Spirit LNAPL Investigation Towards Remedial Design Using U...Ralph Simon, P.G.
Simon, R.T. (2017, November). Focusing a Mineral Spirit LNAPL Investigation Towards Remedial Design Using UVOST™ Combined with Traditional Sampling to Assess 3-D Distribution. Paper presented at the RE3 Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
Focusing a Mineral Spirit LNAPL Investigation Towards Remedial Design Using U...Ralph Simon, P.G.
Simon, R.T. (2017, November). Focusing a Mineral Spirit LNAPL Investigation Towards Remedial Design Using UVOST™ Combined with Traditional Sampling to Assess 3-D Distribution. Paper presented at the RE3 Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
Presentation by Dr Robert Wright, APEC and US Department of Energy at the 2015 CCUS Workshop on CO2 Storage, January 22 at the University of Sonora, Hermosillo
A presentation about innovative technologies to remove nitrogen from wastewater. Presented by Peter Annunziato from BioprocessH2O during the Buzzards Bay Coalition's 2011 Decision Makers Workshop series. Learn more at www.savebuzzardsbay.org/DecisionMakers
Internet2: How Your Network Can Help Reduce Your Carbon Footprint and Create...Montana State University
The attached slides are from a presentation made at the annual Internet2 Conference which was held this year in San Antonio, Texas. The slides were developed/co-presented by Jerry Sheehan (Calit2) and Rod Wilson (Nortel)
The Global CCS Institute presented a workshop at the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) ‘Carbon Management Technology Conference’ in Alexandria, Virginia on 20 October 2013.
Enforcement Penalty ProcessUniversity of HartfordApril 16,.docxgidmanmary
Enforcement
Penalty Process
University of Hartford
April 16, 2020
MaryAnn Haverstock
Penalty Components
Three main components
1. Economic Benefit
2. Basic Gravity Based
3. Continuing Gravity Based
+/- adjustments
You will be setting up your Penalty Assessment project in a spreadsheet format with individual sections that represent each of the three main components.
Then, you will have an additional spreadsheet that will make adjustments according to the Enforcement Response Policy and the Penalty Assessment Policy
Economic Benefit Component
Delayed economic benefit
OR
Avoided economic benefit
EPA has a BEN model that may help you to calculate your economic benefit.
More likely, you will be conducting your own research for penalty equivalent costs that have been delayed or avoided. Then, you are including that cost (economic benefit) in your penalty for that violation.
Basic Gravity Based Component
Extent of Deviation
Relates to the violation itself
Major – substantial noncompliance
Moderate – significant noncompliance
Minor – Minimal noncompliance
Potential for Harm
Harm to the Environment
Harm to the Regulatory Program
Population at risk
Environment at risk
Quantity of the discharge, emission, waste, material..
Nature of the physical, chemical, biological, other characteristics- including pollutant concentration, toxicity, fire or explosion hazard, corrosivity, hazard from direct contact..
Quality of natural resource
Continuing Gravity Based Penalty Component
Same breakout as the Gravity based component, except you will have a range for this penalty component.
Extent of Deviation (from legal requirements)
Relates to the violation itself
Major – substantial noncompliance
Moderate – significant noncompliance
Minor – Minimal noncompliance
Potential for harm
Harm to the Environment
Harm to the Regulatory Program
Population at risk
Environment at risk
Quantity of the discharge, emission, waste, material..
Nature of the physical, chemical, biological, other characteristics- including pollutant concentration, toxicity, fire or explosion hazard, corrosivity, hazard from direct contact..
Quality of natural resource
Adjustments portion of the penalty in the penalty component
Good faith efforts
Degree of willfulness/negligence
History of noncompliance
Ability to pay
Other unique factors (ex. Cost of litigation)
Final penalty summary page
Final report to include all subcategories of your penalty calculations and your final TOTAL penalty. Spreadsheet may be most helpful to you.
All format is up to your choices, But - you must be clear and concise.
An introduction to explain your assumptions as you move through the inspection report and make your decisions about extents and potentials and adjustments
This is an exercise. One goal for this project is the amount of critical thinking that must happen for you as you make your decisions – seeing the levels of choices and decisions
RCRA (HAZARDOUS WASTE) INSPECTION RE ...
Please join EPA Region 9 and GEO Inc. for a technical presentation on In Situ Gas Thermal Remediation (GTR™) and thermal conductive heating (TCH) that will provide regulators, consultants, and field applicators with an understanding of the primary thermally enhanced contaminant removal mechanisms and will help distinguish three types of In Situ Thermal Remediation available commercially in the U.S. and internationally. Additionally, benefits from heat generation, such as increased rates of naturally occurring processes (including hydrolysis, increased bio-availability, and different forms of bio-degradation at various temperature regimes) will be highlighted. In order to identify when In Situ Thermal is appropriate, important design factors will be discussed for their applicability and operation including developing a comprehensive and high resolution conceptual site model through the use of passive soil gas sampling, MIP, LIF, and other high resolution techniques.
Presentation by Dr Robert Wright, APEC and US Department of Energy at the 2015 CCUS Workshop on CO2 Storage, January 22 at the University of Sonora, Hermosillo
A presentation about innovative technologies to remove nitrogen from wastewater. Presented by Peter Annunziato from BioprocessH2O during the Buzzards Bay Coalition's 2011 Decision Makers Workshop series. Learn more at www.savebuzzardsbay.org/DecisionMakers
Internet2: How Your Network Can Help Reduce Your Carbon Footprint and Create...Montana State University
The attached slides are from a presentation made at the annual Internet2 Conference which was held this year in San Antonio, Texas. The slides were developed/co-presented by Jerry Sheehan (Calit2) and Rod Wilson (Nortel)
The Global CCS Institute presented a workshop at the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) ‘Carbon Management Technology Conference’ in Alexandria, Virginia on 20 October 2013.
Enforcement Penalty ProcessUniversity of HartfordApril 16,.docxgidmanmary
Enforcement
Penalty Process
University of Hartford
April 16, 2020
MaryAnn Haverstock
Penalty Components
Three main components
1. Economic Benefit
2. Basic Gravity Based
3. Continuing Gravity Based
+/- adjustments
You will be setting up your Penalty Assessment project in a spreadsheet format with individual sections that represent each of the three main components.
Then, you will have an additional spreadsheet that will make adjustments according to the Enforcement Response Policy and the Penalty Assessment Policy
Economic Benefit Component
Delayed economic benefit
OR
Avoided economic benefit
EPA has a BEN model that may help you to calculate your economic benefit.
More likely, you will be conducting your own research for penalty equivalent costs that have been delayed or avoided. Then, you are including that cost (economic benefit) in your penalty for that violation.
Basic Gravity Based Component
Extent of Deviation
Relates to the violation itself
Major – substantial noncompliance
Moderate – significant noncompliance
Minor – Minimal noncompliance
Potential for Harm
Harm to the Environment
Harm to the Regulatory Program
Population at risk
Environment at risk
Quantity of the discharge, emission, waste, material..
Nature of the physical, chemical, biological, other characteristics- including pollutant concentration, toxicity, fire or explosion hazard, corrosivity, hazard from direct contact..
Quality of natural resource
Continuing Gravity Based Penalty Component
Same breakout as the Gravity based component, except you will have a range for this penalty component.
Extent of Deviation (from legal requirements)
Relates to the violation itself
Major – substantial noncompliance
Moderate – significant noncompliance
Minor – Minimal noncompliance
Potential for harm
Harm to the Environment
Harm to the Regulatory Program
Population at risk
Environment at risk
Quantity of the discharge, emission, waste, material..
Nature of the physical, chemical, biological, other characteristics- including pollutant concentration, toxicity, fire or explosion hazard, corrosivity, hazard from direct contact..
Quality of natural resource
Adjustments portion of the penalty in the penalty component
Good faith efforts
Degree of willfulness/negligence
History of noncompliance
Ability to pay
Other unique factors (ex. Cost of litigation)
Final penalty summary page
Final report to include all subcategories of your penalty calculations and your final TOTAL penalty. Spreadsheet may be most helpful to you.
All format is up to your choices, But - you must be clear and concise.
An introduction to explain your assumptions as you move through the inspection report and make your decisions about extents and potentials and adjustments
This is an exercise. One goal for this project is the amount of critical thinking that must happen for you as you make your decisions – seeing the levels of choices and decisions
RCRA (HAZARDOUS WASTE) INSPECTION RE ...
Please join EPA Region 9 and GEO Inc. for a technical presentation on In Situ Gas Thermal Remediation (GTR™) and thermal conductive heating (TCH) that will provide regulators, consultants, and field applicators with an understanding of the primary thermally enhanced contaminant removal mechanisms and will help distinguish three types of In Situ Thermal Remediation available commercially in the U.S. and internationally. Additionally, benefits from heat generation, such as increased rates of naturally occurring processes (including hydrolysis, increased bio-availability, and different forms of bio-degradation at various temperature regimes) will be highlighted. In order to identify when In Situ Thermal is appropriate, important design factors will be discussed for their applicability and operation including developing a comprehensive and high resolution conceptual site model through the use of passive soil gas sampling, MIP, LIF, and other high resolution techniques.
Similar to Explosive Destruction Working Group Update 11 June 2014 (20)
Presented to:
Kentucky Chemical Demilitarization Citizens’ Advisory Commission and
Chemical Destruction Community Advisory Board
Presented by:
Jeff Brubaker Doug Omichinski
Site Project Manager Project Manager
Presented to:
Kentucky Chemical Demilitarization Citizens’ Advisory Commission
and Kentucky Chemical Destruction Community Advisory Board
Presented by:
LTC Christopher Grice
Commander, Blue Grass Chemical Activity
Presented to:
Kentucky Chemical Demilitarization Citizens’ Advisory Commission and
Chemical Destruction Community Advisory Board
Presented by:
Jeff Brubaker Doug Omichinski
Site Project Manager Project Manager
Presented to:
Kentucky Chemical Demilitarization Citizens’ Advisory Commission and Kentucky Chemical Destruction Community Advisory Board
Presented by:
LTC Christopher Grice
Commander, Blue Grass Chemical Activity
Presented to:
Chemical Destruction Community Advisory Board’s Explosive Destruction Technology Working Group
Presented by:
John McArthur, Blue Grass Chemical Agent-Destruction Pilot Plant (BGCAPP)
Neil Frenzl, BGCAPP
Allison Respess, BGCAPP
Presented to:
Kentucky Chemical Demilitarization Citizens’ Advisory Commission and
Chemical Destruction Community Advisory Board
Presented by:
Jeff BrubakerSite Project Manager
Allison RespessAssistant Project Manager for Explosive Destruction Technology
Presented to:
Kentucky Chemical Demilitarization Citizens’ Advisory Commission/ Chemical Destruction Community Advisory Board Meeting
Presented by:
Jeff Brubaker
Site Project Manager
Presented to:
Kentucky Chemical Demilitarization Citizens’ Advisory Commission/ Chemical Destruction Community Advisory Board Meeting
Presented by:
Jeff Brubaker Tom McKinney
Site Project Manager Project Manager
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
2. KY EDT Working Group Members Tour Anniston EDT
18 March: Four members of the Kentucky EDT Working Group toured the
Anniston, Alabama EDT facility. Members included: Rev. Robert Blythe
(2nd from left); Leslie Kaylor (4th from left); Craig Williams (5th from left);
and, Terry House (6th from left).
3. 6 May 2014
30% Design
EDT Working Group Meeting
In attendance were the following:
Robert Blythe, CDCAB; Jeff Brubaker, BGCAPP; Joe Elliott, Blue Grass Army Depot;
Doug Hindman, Kentucky Chemical Demilitarization Citizens' Advisory Commission
(CAC)/CDCAB; Debbie Hogan, BGCAPP; Terry House, CDCAB; Scott Jackson, CDCAB;
Leslie Kaylor, CDCAB; John McArthur, Bechtel Parsons Blue Grass (BPBG); Sarah Parke,
BGCAPP; Stephanie Parrett, BGCAPP; Chester Powell, CDCAB; Kevin Roberts, BPBG;
Regina Stivers, CDCAB; Daniel Walker, Kentucky Department for Environmental
Protection (KDEP); April Webb, KDEP; Craig Williams, CAC/CDCAB; Todd Williams, Blue
Grass Chemical Activity (BGCA).
Excerpts from this briefing include
4. O2SF Outside Operations Support Facility
ESB EDT Support Building
MH Monitoring House
ESM EDT Service Magazine
EEB EDT Enclosure Building
CON Control Room
TOF Treaty Office Facility
4
EDT and OPS Facilities
6. 6
EDT Enclosure Building (EEB)
Layout is based
on the Vendor’s
Preliminary
Design and Equipment
Layout Drawings
7. 7
Note: Our Scrap Conveyor
is turned 90 degrees from
the Cool Down Conveyor
Feed
Conveyor
Munitions
Lift
Dust
Collection
Scrap
Bin
Belt
Conveyor
Secondary
Containment
Buffer Tank
EDT Process Equipment Layout
10. Reverse angle
Spray Dryer Dosing Station
Spray Dryer Waste Drum
Quench Venturi
Bag House Waste Drum
Emergency
Water Tank
Bag House Filter
Spray Dryer
Thermal
Oxidizer
Scrubbers
10
OTS Process Equipment Layout
11. Activity Date
EDT CW Operations Jan – Oct 2017
Ramp-Up Period
Full Rate Period
Regulatory Testing
Over-Pack Processing
EDT Closure and Turn-Over Nov 2017 – May 2018
Decontamination
Restoration
De-staffing
System / Facility Turn Over
Main Plant CW Operations (forecasted Start date) Jan 2018
11
EDT Schedule and Key Milestones
12. Location: Anniston BGCAPP
Description SDC 1200 CM (Chemical Mobile) SDC 1200 C (Chemical)
Transportable unit Fix Facility unit
CW Net Explosive Wt. (NEW) 2.2 lb HE / 6.61 Propellant TBD (min, 2.2 lb HE / 6.61 Propellant)
Fragment Shield: Tube Shaped (sides only) Bowl Shaped (sides with a bottom)
DC Heater: 3 on the bottom of the DC 3 on the bottom plus additional on sides
Cooling Fan for Locking Ring: None Yes (added to minimize binding at high temps.)
LC1 and LC2 Vents to THO: No Yes
(to minimize/prevent agent migration to the Process
Ventilation)
Bypass valve around off-gas No Yes orifice:
(to minimize press in the chamber to minimize agent
migration to LC2)
Off-Gas Treatment System (OTS): Has a SDC 1200 sized OTS Has a larger SDC 2000 OTS (75% larger)
Thermal Oxidizer (THO): 162 ft3 321 ft3 (98% larger)
Bleed Water Tank: No Yes (added to support 24/7 operations)
Chiller to remove Condensate: No (collection pump to recycle H2O) Yes (added after the Neutral Scrubber)
Re-Heater after Chiller: None initially – installed later Included
Carbon Filter System: IONEX CD2000 IONEX CD4000
Building Type: Sprung Structure Steel Building
Building HVAC: No - Portable AC unit added Yes
Cascading Ventilation System: Vapor containment only Yes (with Category A, B, C, and D areas)
Number of Mustard Projectiles: 2,737 CW munitions processed Approx. 16,000 munitions to be processed
Agent Types: HD and HT Mustard H Mustard (with solids and heels)
DOT Bottles: None processed Two (2) are planned
12
EDT Unit Differences
(Anniston vs. BGCAPP)
13. The preceding slides are meant to highlight certain aspects of the 30%
design discussed at the EDT meeting.
A complete set of EDT slides from the 6 May meeting is available by
contacting the Outreach Office @ 626- 8944
-----
ADDITIONAL EDT ISSUE – What is the amount and the disposal plan for
Projectile Bodies resulting from EDT processing of Mustard.
Answer: Approximately 729 tons of “clean-for-release” scrap metal will
be generated from EDT processing and will be managed under the
Kentucky Administrative Regulations scrap metals exemption and sent
to a metal recycling facility.
14. EDT PERMIT MODIFICATION
Permit Issuance Timeframe
Part B, Class 3 Permit Modification to add a Subpart X typically have a
375 day regulatory review timeframe.
Potential time to review the EDT modification is contingent upon the
number of noticed of deficiency and technical completeness
of the application
15. EDT PERMIT STATUS
Post NEPA EA/FONSI
--
EDT Application Submitted: 14 March
Public Meeting Held: 14 April
CAC/CDCAB Comments Submitted: 14 May
Current Status: Comments Under Review (30 Days)
- -
Next Milestone
DRAFT Permit Issued = Begins 45 Day Comment Period