The document discusses the moral implications of capital punishment, arguing it is unjustified because it deprives individuals, including death row inmates, of their valuable futures. The author references Don Marquis's argument against killing as it undermines the potential future experiences of a person. Additionally, the document covers historical debates on slavery, particularly focusing on the Lincoln-Douglas debates, highlighting differing viewpoints on slavery and its expansion in the United States.

1. A Debate of the Death Penalty Essay
The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and
under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. I believe there are no circumstances
under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital
punishment is unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals
of valuable futures. To support my thesis that capital punishment is not justified, I will expand upon
an argument made my Don Marquis in his essay "Why Abortion is Immoral" in which he argues that
killing is immoral on the grounds that it deprives human beings of a valuable future. My argument
is as follows:
1.Killing is wrong because it deprives the...show more content...
The outside factors and conditions are irrelevant. Rather, the value is determined by how that
person perceives his or her own life and these future experiences. Thus, when someone is killed, he
or she is deprived of all the things that were of value and will be of value to him or her in the
future. Causing this loss of a valuable future is ultimately what makes killing wrong and immoral
because that individual has permanently lost the opportunity to enjoy his or her future experiences
which are valuable to him or her. My second premise states that death row criminals are in the same
moral category as other human beings with respect to the moral value of their lives. The only factor
which differentiates a criminal from a non–criminal is the fact that the criminal, usually irrefutably,
violated community standards and the law to commit a crime. In the case of a criminal on death row,
he or she would have had to have committed a serious capital crime to receive the death sentence.
Since committing a capital offense is the only reason death row criminals are different from other
human beings, death row criminals are the same as other human beings in every other respect,
including with respect to the value of their futures. Furthermore, the future of a criminal on death
row is just as valuable as the future of a human being not on death row. Any form of capital
punishment is a form of killing. It does not matter who is actually doing the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Lincoln-Douglas Debate Essay examples
The Lincoln–Douglas Debates of 1858 was a very influential event that occurred in American history
and has much significance, even till this day. The debates were in contest for the United States
Senate seat in Illinois. The main topic involved in the debates was based around slavery and the
separation of the union because of it. Both Lincoln and Douglas refer to the U.S. Constitution in
their remarks and state different opinions surrounding what they interpret the meaning of certain
parts regarding slavery to be. Abraham Lincoln's position on slavery was the belief that the
expansion of it to Free states and new territories should be ceased and that it eventually be abolished
completely throughout the country. He believed simply that...show more content...
Lincoln suggests that the institution of slavery be contained by preventing the spread of it to the
new territories and Free states, although he had no interest in interfering with the already entitled
slave states. He agrees that it was the right of the state to make its own decisions, not the federal
government. Although Lincoln did not favor getting involved with abolishing slavery in the
already declared slave states, he did favor total abolition in the distant future. He was first worried
about stopping the expansion of slavery and then the next step to be taken would have been the
"ultimate extinction" of it throughout the states. Lincoln did believe that every white man had
no more equality than another. For this is one of the main reasons why at this time a resolution
needed to be found in order to keep this equality in the new territories. Lincoln made a valid point
in his speech that if slave holders were to settle in a new territory along with people opposed to
slavery, which party has the right to decide what type of territory and future state it will be
declared as? As for the rights of slaves, Lincoln agreed with Douglas that slaves did not have the
same individual rights as everyone else, but he did believe that the liberties given under the
Declaration of Independence involved such slaves. It is obvious that the Republicans of this time
find slavery as being a "moral, social, and political wrong",
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. The Advantages Of Debate
Nowadays, English is important for everyone, English had been taught in every school, starting
from elementary school until the University level. English has become the global language and the
primary method of communication for the people of the world in fact it is now common for
English to be referred to as International or even Global English. English learning is very important
for the students, because if they can mastery English it means they have been use English in orally
and in written form. Speaking is one of the basic skill in English. According to Clark (1977:233)
speaking is fundamental act. Other than that, Widdowson (1984:58) states that speaking is the active
or productive skill. In speaking, the students should master the elements...show more content...
In a debate, failure to anticipate what the opposition's points will be is a sign of narrow
mindedness. It allows one to see a different point of view, we also can learn from each other, develop
our knowledge and opinions, and make better informed argument. Debate provides opportunities to
practice all four language skills especially speaking. Debate also supports development of critical
thinking skill of the students. Debate can promotes learning. Debate is one of the powerful
techniques that can develop students speaking ability that can affect students' achievement.
Maryadi (2008:16, in Yuliani 2009) states that debate can motivate students thinking, moreover if
they must defend their stance or opinion which is in contradiction with conviction their self. This
strategy can involve all students to be active, not only in debate performer.
Debating is a teaching strategy that provides a framework for students to explore and develop a
range of views over an issue. Debating encourages students to (State Government: Victoria:
Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Debate of Globalization Essay
1. Globalization affects national sovereignty of both developing countries as well as developed
countries. By sovereignty, we mean the independence of countries to make decisions and conduct
policy in different areas like the economy, corporate and industry related legislation, environmental
regulations, politics, etc. From the video, please provide one example each of how globalization
infringes on the national sovereignty of, a) a developing country, and, b) a developed country? How,
and through which agency/organization/rule, did each of the above infringements occur?
Globalization infringes on the national sovereignty of a developing country and a developed country.
In a developing country, there is usually suspicion that...show more content...
Please provide two examples from the video of how globalization affected the culture of a country
(can be more than one country)? Were the effects in your opinion, good or bad?
France – In France, in order to prevent the dilution of their culture, they have prohibited the
business use of US terms such as le weekend and le drugstore. They also protect their movie
industry. France also went into battle with McDonalds. "In the battle for France, Jose BovГ©, the
protester who vandalized a McDonald's in 1999 and was then running for president, proved to be
no match for Le Big Mac. The first round of the presidential election was held on April 22, and
BovГ© finished an embarrassing tenth, garnering barely 1 percent of the total vote. By then,
McDonald's had eleven hundred restaurants in France, three hundred more than it had had when
BovГ© gave new meaning to the term "drive–through." The company was pulling in over a million
people per day in France, and annual turnover was growing at twice the rate it was in the United
States. Arresting as those numbers were, there was an even more astonishing data point: By 2007,
France had become the second–most profitable market in the world for McDonald's, surpassed only
by the land that gave the world fast food. Against McDonald's, BovГ© had lost in a landslide." The
French, in my opinion, had a right to protect their culture from US "Coca–colonization", a term that
refers to globalization or cultural
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Debates Essay
Before engaging in the debates with Senator Stephen A. Douglas, Lincoln was relatively unknown in
the political world and was just beginning his career in politics. Abraham Lincoln's reputation was
just starting to grow, and his life was about to make a drastic change. The Lincoln–Douglas debates
of 1858 were a turning point in Abraham Lincoln's political career.
After being nominated to the Illinois legislature, Lincoln gave his famous "House Divided" speech
which caused much grief between the North and the South.
A short while after he was nominated, Lincoln challenged Stephen A.Douglas to a series of debates.
Douglas quickly accepted, and named seven sites in Illinois for...show more content...
The majority of the people were for slavery, not against it. This debate proved disappointing for
Lincoln and his followers.
At Charleston, Lincoln tried to break away from any radicalism. He didn't want to be labeled as an
abolitionist. In this particular debate, Lincoln showed his support of the Fugitive Slave Law. He
said that slavery was protected by the Constitution. The main concern of this debate, as well as the
rest of the debates was whether or not the government should ban slavery in the United States, or do
the citizens have the democratic right to end slavery.
The fifth debate was held at Galesburg. This debate helped Lincoln regain his confidence. He
attacked all of Douglas' points firmly. He replied to the Kansas problem with inspiration and
determination. He wanted to prove to the town of Galesburg that slavery was "a moral and political
wrong."
The next encounter took place in Quincy, Illinois, on Wednesday, October 13, 1858. It focused on
personal issues of both speakers, and the differences in speaking techniques, physical appearances,
and personalities. Lincoln made sure that he was not assumed to be an
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. Debates About Slavery Essay example
Debates Over Slavery
In 1787, delegates arrived in Philadelphia to begin work on revising the Articles of Confederation.
Most states agreed that the Articles had not provided the country with the type of guidelines that it
needed to run smoothly. There were many things missing, and many issues that needed further
consideration. One of the most controversial topics at the Constitutional Convention was figuring out
the country's policy towards slavery. When all was said and done, slavery was still legal after the
Convention because the southern economy depended on it and because most people decided that
this was an issue that should be decided by each individual state, rather than the country as a whole.
The issue of slavery was taken very...show more content...
Some southern states, such as Virginia andMaryland had already begun to change their laws
dealing with slavery. They made laws preventing the import of more slaves into their states, and
North Carolina was in the process of discussing the same thing. Many people opposed this idea,
because if two or three states oppose the importation of slavery, but two or three allow it, then the
law of the other two states is useless. This seeming contradiction caused many people to reaffirm the
idea that this was a national issue. This brought about one of the first tests of federalism.
Once the Convention heard all the arguments and voted on all the clauses contained about
slavery, the delegates concluded that slavery should still be legal. There are a few reasons why
they decided this. The first major reason was that the southern economy depended on slavery to
operate their plantations. If slavery were abolished, then they would lose their entire work force
and would be forced to find white people to work for them instead. This is a major problem,
however, since poor white people felt that they were a step up from the African slaves. They didn't
want to be doing a job that was normally done by the blacks (It's important to realize that most
southern people at that time felt that blacks were an inferior race, and should be treated as such).
Many supporters of slavery, such as Charles Pinckney even argued that "In all ages, one–half
of mankind
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

7. Essay on Nature vs Nurture Debate
Nature vs Nurture Debate
Nature versus Nurture is the issue of the degree to which environment and heredity influence
behavior and development. In this issue nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. Which
means behaviors are based on the genetic makeup of an individual and is an influence of the
individuals' growth and development throughout life. On the other hand nurture are causes of
behaviors that are environmental. Which means the influence is from, parents, siblings, family,
friends and all other experiences to which the individual is exposed to.
Throughout my childhood, I didn't grow up free of environmental influences nor did I develop
without being affected by my inherited genetic makeup. I think...show more content...
In reading stories about identical twins my point of view is easily understood. Various types of
psychologist have analyzed the study of identical twins. It shows that individuals with the same
genetic make–up can be totally different, when it comes to personality. Nurture promotes the twins
to grow up as separate individuals. Its a lot better if a twin has his or her own personality rather
than the same exact personality of the other half. I think this great debate weighs heavier on the
nurture side. As a child my parents, and sibling overshadowed my genetic make–up. No matter how
much I thought my physical traits made me behave. It did not affect me more than the things that I
had seen and been exposed to. The more things that I had seen around and experienced made me the
person that I am today. If my genetic make–up was totally different, to a certain extent, I am sure
that I?d behave the same way that I do presently. There are exceptions to that. For instance if I
were six foot five and one hundred and ninety pounds, I?d most likely be in the NBA and be really
rich. I think if I was really rich and in the NBA I wouldn?t have the same worries that I have
today. Even if before I were in the NBA I would have lots of attention and have a lot more
confidence. So to an extent I would change a little if my genetic make–up were different. In a sense,
genetic make–up is just a competitor to the environmental factors
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

8. Lincoln-Douglas Debate Essay examples
Every single moment that takes place in history arguably leaves an effect that lasts much longer than
just the initial outcome. The Lincoln Douglas Debates are by far one of the truest examples of this
happening. The seven debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas that took place in
1858 had extreme importance in Illinois that created effects that decided the presidential election of
1860.
The Lincoln Douglas debates were a series of several debates that took place all over the state of
Illinois. In these debates, two men argued in order to express their beliefs and standpoints on certain
issues, primarily slavery, in an attempt to be elected into a seat in the U.S. Senate. The two men that
participated in these debates were...show more content...
Abraham Lincoln began as a lawyer born in Kentucky who gained attention to himself through
having contrasting beliefs to Douglas over the topic of slavery. Through the Lincoln Douglas
debates, Lincoln morphed into a candidate prepared to become an unforgettable president (History).
On June 16, 1858 made the statement "a house divided against itself cannot stand," in a speech
about slavery, deeply contrasting with Douglas's views and speaking about the conspiracy of the
democratic plot to get slavery legalized in every state. This conspiracy, of course, was being partly
conspired by Stephen Douglas. Three weeks later, Stephen Douglas refuted these claims while also
calling Abraham Lincoln a dangerous abolitionist (Looking for Lincoln). Being an abolitionist at the
time held a very negative connotation because abolitionists were often irrational extremists (Morel
4). The following evening, in the exact same place as Douglas had spoken, Lincoln spoke once more.
The Lincoln Douglas debates all began due to the fact that Douglas had been travelling all over the
state of Illinois making speeches in order to increase the likelihood of his chance to be reelected into
the U.S. Senate. More often than not, less than a week later, sometimes the very same night, the
annoying Republican candidate, Lincoln would follow suit and speak to the same group of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net