The document discusses the importance of ethics in research, particularly in the context of stem cell research, highlighting the moral dilemmas associated with creating and destroying embryos. It contrasts the concepts of equality and equity, arguing that true fairness involves differentiating treatment based on individual capabilities rather than enforcing uniformity. Additionally, it advocates for funding the space industry as a means to create jobs, advance technology, and improve international relations.

1. Ethics in Research Essay
Ethics in Research
Research is one of the most successful means of obtaining a wide variety of information concerning
limited or broad topics. However, abundant as this information may be, it is important to maintain an
ethical outlook to all research topics. As research and its subsequent experimentations advance in
light of new generations, the idea of ethics becomes a more prominent issue. Researchers must be
aware of the conflicts that their research may bring about. They must know how to address their
findings in a moral way appealing to the pro and cons. Researchers can not simply accumulate data.
Coupled with data is the process of analysis, where researchers manipulate their findings...show more
content...
According to the National Institute of Health, stem cells are unique cells created from embryos for
infertility purposes usually through the process of in vitro fertilization (Institute on Health). Stems
cells have two important characteristics that differentiate them from other types of cells. One is that
they are unspecialized cells that rejuvenate themselves through cell division. The other is that, under
certain conditions, they can be induced to become certain specialized cells (Institute on Health).
For certain people this is life saving news. Now that cells can be specialized under these
unspecialized stem cells, a patient can receive new heart cells for a diseased heart or many other life
threatening diseases (Institute on Health). This information can be used in a variety of useful ways,
but is it morally right to create embryos only to destroy them? Are these potential humans that could
help them world in some other way? This is the perspective of many people fighting against
stem–cell research. These activists claim that stem–cell research plays against the will of God.
Moreover, if stem cell research is legalized world–wide, who is to say that people will use it only to
benefit the curing of disease? Is it possible that people will become careless and more susceptible to
disease only to receive stem cells to
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Argument Reflection Paper
Thank you for reaching out to me about this. I am ecstatic to hear that you enjoyed your time at the
camp, and that you are attempting to apply what you learned there in everyday life. First off, there
is no need to beat yourself up about not understanding how to analyze everyday arguments. The
types of arguments we use on a daily basis rarely follow the patterns that we taught you classify
them by, so it is understandable that you might get confused when trying to analyze them. That
being said, understanding how to deal with these arguments would be a very useful thing to know,
so I am going to try my best to help you strengthen the three main skills of critical thinking. Which,
of course, you know to be analyzing an argument, evaluating the premises for relevance, and
evaluating the premises for truth. I am going to go step by step through an example of an everyday
argument, which I have attached to this email, so that I can hopefully help you with your problem.
We are going to first start with an analysis of the argument. Just to make it a little easier to
understand, I am going to split this analysis into two parts. This first part is simple going to involve
a surface analysis of the argument. We will determine the issue, conclusion, and premises. The
second part will involve a somewhat deeper analysis. This will include diagraming the argument and
determining the line of reasoning for each argument and sub argument. Determining if they are
inductive/deductive and the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Argument Essay On Equality
Equality Argument Essay "THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal." these are
the first words read in the short story, "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut. The story is about
a future where everyone in the world is, "not only equal in front of God and the law", but also
equal in every which way, like knowledge and looks and physical ability. In the story, a couple is
watching tv and witness their arrested son break into a ballet and dance a wonderful dance only to
be shot dead by the handicapper general herself. That leaves a question, what the reader can easily
tell from the story is that the author believes that equality is a bad thing. To end, I believe that
equality is not what we should need one hundred percent but give everyone an equal chance and see
where they take it.
To start, why would equality be so bad? From the first view, equality sounds like a good thing.
Everyone gets equal treatment, pay, etc. But what about when a serial killer gets the same
treatment a veterinarian. How fair would it be for someone who saves animals lives to be treated
the same publically as someone who's murdered, multiple people? After seeing this, equality can
seem fairly split, but there's also a difference, there's equality then there's equity. Equality would be
people treated equal, especially socially and equal opportunities, while equity is definite fairness.
That means people brought down or up to meet the same level. What I believe was exhibited in the
story "Harrison Bergeron", was not equality, but actually equity. This can be seen by them bringing
people down from their abilities or up to meet a standard to make everyone equal. As the story
states, "A little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times",
that means they are bringing some people down to the same level but at the same time not bringing
people up to that level. "Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else", the idea of this, in
theory, seems clever. Everyone equal in every single way, even mentally. But the more the reader
may think of it, they see little holes. There's no drive to get better, no devotion to beat something,
there's just what it is and the reader can't do anything to get
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Project 5 Research Argument
Project 5: Researched Argument Analysis
The main claim was that re–funding the space industry would help America by creating jobs,
producing new and innovative technology, and help international relations.
The reasons for how the job market would improve is that, government agencies typically contract
the work out to civilian corporations. Further helping the civilian corporations grow and have a
need for a large amount of additional manpower, resulting in more jobs for the American people.
This is based on the American defense agency, which in total, has over 100,000 additional civilian
jobs tied into the manufacturing and maintaining of a single type of aircraft.
The space industry has produced many amazing technologies in the past from the development of
fireproof material that makes up the modern firefighter suit to new forms of power generation. This
is based on the fact that the National Aeronautics Space Agency (NASA)...show more content...
That journal went into great detail in the statistics of the survivability rate of the plants. On the
other hand, some of my sources came from United States agencies such as the Department of
Energy or NASA showing statistics on energy production and its efficiency in space. The ways I
made my argument persuasive was through sound logic, statistics, and examples. For example,
when talking about how if the space industry was as well funded as the military industry it could
produce hundreds of thousands of jobs by using the statistics from Lockheed Martin. Moreover,
when I talked about how we could remove space junk I gave examples of ways we could remove it
from a scientific journal by Claude Phipps and Mike Lander. I believe that through sound logics,
good statistics, and examples the majority of my audience was successfully
Get more content on HelpWriting.net