The document is a sermon discussing racial injustice in the United States. It summarizes how slavery gave way to Jim Crow laws enforcing racial segregation. While civil rights reforms promised equality, mass incarceration has emerged as the new system of racial control. The war on drugs disproportionately targets African Americans, and the U.S. now imprisons more black people than were enslaved before the Civil War. The sermon calls Christians to work towards transforming institutions and achieving true justice and equality for all.
The document summarizes that poverty, lack of opportunity, and systemic inequalities contribute significantly to crime rates, yet the criminal justice system focuses disproportionately on punishing poor and minority individuals. Other threats such as occupational injuries, medical errors, and environmental pollution endanger public health and safety more than street crime but are not treated as criminal matters.
This document discusses the criminalization of barebacking (unprotected sex) between men and analyzes it through a queer theory lens. It argues that current laws around HIV transmission reflect a heteronormative view that constructs "good gays" who conform to mainstream norms, versus "bad queers" who engage in stigmatized sexual practices like barebacking. The document draws on queer theory to critique how the judiciary views itself as the moral arbiter of acceptable sexuality. It asserts that laws and court decisions surrounding barebacking fail to consider the lived experiences of queer communities and perpetuate a divide between respectable and transgressive forms of gay sexuality.
The document discusses the disproportionate impact of the criminal justice system on communities of color and calls for reform. Key points:
- People of color, especially Black and Hispanic men, are incarcerated at much higher rates than whites, despite similar rates of drug use and crime.
- Racial disparities exist at every level, from policing and sentencing to employment opportunities post-release.
- The growth of the for-profit prison industry creates perverse incentives to incarcerate more people, especially minorities, to guarantee profits.
- Meaningful reform is needed to dismantle systemic racism in the criminal justice system and address it as a civil rights issue. Some local initiatives show promise in reducing racial dispar
The title of this week’s session is taken from the famous study of ‘mugging’ by Stuart Hall et al. in the 1970s in which the authors note the racialised nature of the crime of mugging and the instigation of a public ‘moral panic’ in the association of young black men and violent street crime. Taking this as a starting point, we shall look at the way in which racialised people have been seen as having a natural propensity to crime and deviance that justifies the use of ‘special measures’ against them. We shall pay particularly close attention to the cases of disproportionate incarceration, the ‘prison industrial complex’ and of the suspension of law in the case of the ‘Northern Territory Intervention’.
This document summarizes the 2012 Trafficking in Persons Report. It discusses how the promise of freedom from slavery remains unfulfilled for millions around the world despite laws prohibiting slavery. It emphasizes the importance of a victim-centered approach that focuses on prevention, prosecution, and protection. Protection efforts aim to restore victims' rights and provide services to help them recover from the trauma of being trafficked. The report examines promising practices and potential pitfalls in providing victim protection. It stresses the critical role of governments in punishing traffickers through law enforcement and ensuring victims' rights are restored through comprehensive protection services.
The document discusses racial oppression that takes place around the world, where the majority race imposes its beliefs and laws on minority races. It provides examples from South Africa during apartheid, where white people dominated and oppressed black people. It also discusses the experiences of minorities in America, and how systems are designed to favor the dominant white race and oppress or punish those who do not conform.
This document summarizes research on implicit racial bias and its impact on the criminal justice system in the United States. It begins by noting the vast racial disparities that exist at every level of the criminal justice system, with black Americans disproportionately represented in incarceration rates compared to their population. It then discusses research showing that implicit or unconscious racial bias exists independently of individuals' conscious beliefs and can influence behaviors. The document argues that the Supreme Court has failed to acknowledge implicit bias, expanding discretion of criminal justice actors in ways that allow bias to affect decisions and rejecting disparate impact claims. It maintains the Court must recognize implicit bias and its effects to fulfill its duty under the Equal Protection Clause.
The document summarizes that poverty, lack of opportunity, and systemic inequalities contribute significantly to crime rates, yet the criminal justice system focuses disproportionately on punishing poor and minority individuals. Other threats such as occupational injuries, medical errors, and environmental pollution endanger public health and safety more than street crime but are not treated as criminal matters.
This document discusses the criminalization of barebacking (unprotected sex) between men and analyzes it through a queer theory lens. It argues that current laws around HIV transmission reflect a heteronormative view that constructs "good gays" who conform to mainstream norms, versus "bad queers" who engage in stigmatized sexual practices like barebacking. The document draws on queer theory to critique how the judiciary views itself as the moral arbiter of acceptable sexuality. It asserts that laws and court decisions surrounding barebacking fail to consider the lived experiences of queer communities and perpetuate a divide between respectable and transgressive forms of gay sexuality.
The document discusses the disproportionate impact of the criminal justice system on communities of color and calls for reform. Key points:
- People of color, especially Black and Hispanic men, are incarcerated at much higher rates than whites, despite similar rates of drug use and crime.
- Racial disparities exist at every level, from policing and sentencing to employment opportunities post-release.
- The growth of the for-profit prison industry creates perverse incentives to incarcerate more people, especially minorities, to guarantee profits.
- Meaningful reform is needed to dismantle systemic racism in the criminal justice system and address it as a civil rights issue. Some local initiatives show promise in reducing racial dispar
The title of this week’s session is taken from the famous study of ‘mugging’ by Stuart Hall et al. in the 1970s in which the authors note the racialised nature of the crime of mugging and the instigation of a public ‘moral panic’ in the association of young black men and violent street crime. Taking this as a starting point, we shall look at the way in which racialised people have been seen as having a natural propensity to crime and deviance that justifies the use of ‘special measures’ against them. We shall pay particularly close attention to the cases of disproportionate incarceration, the ‘prison industrial complex’ and of the suspension of law in the case of the ‘Northern Territory Intervention’.
This document summarizes the 2012 Trafficking in Persons Report. It discusses how the promise of freedom from slavery remains unfulfilled for millions around the world despite laws prohibiting slavery. It emphasizes the importance of a victim-centered approach that focuses on prevention, prosecution, and protection. Protection efforts aim to restore victims' rights and provide services to help them recover from the trauma of being trafficked. The report examines promising practices and potential pitfalls in providing victim protection. It stresses the critical role of governments in punishing traffickers through law enforcement and ensuring victims' rights are restored through comprehensive protection services.
The document discusses racial oppression that takes place around the world, where the majority race imposes its beliefs and laws on minority races. It provides examples from South Africa during apartheid, where white people dominated and oppressed black people. It also discusses the experiences of minorities in America, and how systems are designed to favor the dominant white race and oppress or punish those who do not conform.
This document summarizes research on implicit racial bias and its impact on the criminal justice system in the United States. It begins by noting the vast racial disparities that exist at every level of the criminal justice system, with black Americans disproportionately represented in incarceration rates compared to their population. It then discusses research showing that implicit or unconscious racial bias exists independently of individuals' conscious beliefs and can influence behaviors. The document argues that the Supreme Court has failed to acknowledge implicit bias, expanding discretion of criminal justice actors in ways that allow bias to affect decisions and rejecting disparate impact claims. It maintains the Court must recognize implicit bias and its effects to fulfill its duty under the Equal Protection Clause.
The document discusses claims that were made about how legalized abortion would reduce crime rates and social problems. It summarizes evidence showing these claims were based on unsupported assumptions and did not account for abortion actually increasing out-of-wedlock births and unstable family structures, which are linked to higher crime rates. While abortion may have culled some high-risk demographics, this was more than offset by its unintended consequences of weakening social norms against premarital sex and non-marital childbearing.
The document discusses claims that were made about how legalized abortion would reduce crime rates and social problems. It summarizes evidence showing these claims were based on unsupported assumptions and did not account for abortion actually increasing out-of-wedlock births and unstable family structures, which are linked to higher crime rates. While abortion may have culled some high-risk demographics, this was more than offset by its unintended consequences of weakening social norms against premarital sex and non-marital childbearing.
The document discusses ethnicity and crime in the UK and USA. It provides statistics showing that ethnic minorities, particularly those of Afro-Caribbean descent, are overrepresented in crime statistics and the prison population compared to their percentage of the total population. However, victim surveys show that most crime is intra-ethnic. There are two main explanations for this: structural factors such as racism and economic marginalization increase criminality; or that discrimination in the criminal justice system results in ethnic minorities being disproportionately policed, arrested, and convicted.
The document discusses several topics related to politics and democracy:
1) A father tries to explain politics to his son by comparing their family roles to different parts of government. The son later says he understands that the president is taking advantage of the working class while the government does nothing.
2) Democracy is seen as a universal value by many around the world, and research shows it can aid development by fostering economic activity. However, some regions like the Middle East still lack democratic institutions that could help advance women's rights.
3) The speaker urges citizens to get involved in the political process through voting, as the government is facing large deficits that could lead to rising taxes if not addressed by the people working together
Racism is a complex phenomenon rooted in the history of modern states and the histories of colonialism and slavery. However, racism is often thought of as individual prejudice, an approach which sees racism as a psychological state of mind rather than a political phenomenon. Everyday racism can be seen in acts of violence, exploitation, discrimination, etc. – but it is not always overt. Indeed, much racism is covert, embedded in institutions such as the education system, healthcare, the police, etc. How can we identify racism in everyday situations? What tools of understanding do we need to identify a situation as racist or non-racist? In which ways does everyday racism affect the health and well-being of racialised people? What do we need to know about racism in order to address our prejudices?
This document discusses hate groups and hate crimes. It begins by outlining objectives of showing how dehumanization can take effect and what happens when individuals are set up to fail. It then provides definitions of hate crimes and hate groups under Canadian law. Several examples of hate groups are described on both the left and right sides of the political spectrum. Common rhetoric and propaganda methods used by these groups are examined, including dehumanization, authoritarian leadership, and the promotion of destructive ideologies. Statistics on hate crimes in Canada and locally in Toronto are also presented.
Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)John Lubbock
This document discusses democracy and human rights in the Gulf region. It argues that multi-party democracy may not always be the best system and could exacerbate divisions in some societies. Electoral systems that foster cooperation may better promote human rights and minority rights. While the Gulf states claim to have consultative bodies, real power remains concentrated among ruling families. Increased access to information is empowering human rights activists and calls for political reform will likely increase. Western strategic and commercial interests have discouraged candor on poor human rights records in the region.
The document summarizes key points from chapters 4-6 of Michelle Alexander's book "The New Jim Crow". It discusses how policies such as the War on Drugs have led to mass incarceration that disproportionately impacts African Americans. It notes that more black Americans are now under correctional control than were enslaved before the Civil War. It examines policies that restrict housing, employment, voting rights, and public assistance for those with criminal records, creating a racial caste system. It argues this system parallels Jim Crow by using race-neutral language to discriminate and by disenfranchising black communities. It calls for recognizing mass incarceration as a new system of racial control and mobilizing for large-scale reform rather than isolated
This summary provides the key points from the document in 3 sentences:
The document discusses the roots of riots and violence in marginalized communities through analyzing Martin Luther King Jr.'s writings on riots, a news article on police brutality in Baltimore, and themes in Richard Wright's novel Native Son. It argues that slow oppression, poverty, and police brutality build pressure over time that can lead to explosive outbursts of violence and riots. While riots are condemned, the document examines the social conditions and injustices that provoke such responses from disenfranchised groups that feel they have no other means of being heard.
Ethnic minorities and religious groups are over-represented in UK prisons relative to their population. Black people are 8 times more likely to be stopped and searched by police and 4 times more likely to be arrested than whites. Muslims make up 12% of the prison population but only 2% of the general UK population. The over-representation of minorities in the prison system could be linked to factors like poverty and discrimination in the legal system. However, the press has exaggerated fears about "Muslim gangs" in prisons; white gangs are also problematic.
How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in americaJoel Leon
This document discusses how fear and ignorance contributed to Donald Trump's election as president in 2016. It argues that white Americans felt threatened by demographic changes showing the U.S. will soon be a minority-majority country. The extreme right exploited these fears by portraying immigrants as threats. Trump reflected anxieties about preserving traditional American culture and values. However, the author believes this victory is ephemeral and the resistance to Trump's policies shows democracy is at an impasse in America.
This document summarizes a paper that examines police brutality against African Americans. It discusses several cases of unarmed black men being killed by police and finds that police are more likely to use force against black men. It argues that implicit racial bias permeates the criminal justice system and causes disproportionate policing and incarceration of African Americans. Statistics show black people are more often stopped and arrested for minor crimes. The document traces these issues back to slavery and Jim Crow laws and argues systemic racism remains deeply entrenched in the criminal justice system.
This document discusses hate crimes on college campuses and the challenges around balancing free speech rights with preventing hate speech. It provides examples of recent hate crimes like racist videos and threats targeted at students' race, gender or sexuality. While public universities must protect free speech, private schools can restrict speech through codes but these are often unconstitutional. The document recommends anti-bias education, free speech areas, and administrative leadership to thoughtfully address issues of hate rather than emotional shouting matches.
The document discusses the historical discrimination faced by the LGBTQ community in America and proposes adopting a new legal standard called the Modus Vivendi Nexus Standard to provide higher protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation under the Equal Protection Clause. It outlines how disgust and views of immorality were used politically to enact anti-gay laws and restrict LGBTQ rights. It also examines key legal and social developments, such as the gay rights movement in the late 1960s and the continued failure of the Constitution to adequately protect this group. The author argues the new standard is necessary to rectify purposeful discrimination and that it would require laws that discriminate based on sexual orientation to have an important government objective and be narrowly tailored without violating rights.
Hate crime (also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime)[1] is a prejudice-motivated crime which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of their membership (or perceived membership) of a certain social group or racial demographic.
Examples of such groups can include, and are almost exclusively limited to ethnicity, disability, language, nationality, physical appearance, religion, gender identity or sexual orientation.[2][3][4] Non-criminal actions that are motivated by these reasons are often called "bias incidents".
"Hate crime" generally refers to criminal acts which are seen to have been motivated by bias against one or more of the social groups listed above, or by bias against their derivatives. Incidents may involve physical assault, homicide, damage to property, bullying, harassment, verbal abuse (which includes slurs) or insults, mate crime or offensive graffiti or letters (hate mail).[5]
A hate crime law is a law intended to deter bias-motivated violence.[6] Hate crime laws are distinct from laws against hate speech: hate crime laws enhance the penalties associated with conduct which is already criminal under other laws, while hate speech laws criminalize a category of speech.
This ppt will help u in understanding hate crimes
Official crime statistics show that ethnic minorities, particularly black people, are overrepresented at various stages of the criminal justice system. Black people are much more likely to be stopped and searched by police, arrested, and imprisoned. However, statistics do not prove whether ethnic groups actually commit crimes at different rates or if overrepresentation is partly due to discrimination within the criminal justice system, such as disproportionate targeting by police. Explanations for differences in crime rates include sociological theories of marginalization, racism, and conflict perspectives, as well as debates around the accuracy and biases of official data.
This document discusses the history and impacts of mass incarceration of African Americans in the United States. It describes how after the abolition of slavery, the convict leasing system allowed private companies to exploit imprisoned African Americans for cheap labor, subjecting them to inhumane conditions and abuse. This laid the foundation for the modern prison industrial complex that disproportionately imprisons African Americans through discriminatory enforcement of drug and other laws. The document examines how mass incarceration has become a lucrative business that continues to negatively impact families and communities of color.
1. The document discusses how race continues to permeate and divide American society despite progress made through civil rights movements and the election of Barack Obama as the first black president.
2. It argues that viewing Obama's election as signaling a "post-racial" America is premature and overlooks ongoing racial disparities in areas like healthcare, earnings, the criminal justice system, and education.
3. The changing demographics of the U.S., with minorities making up 30% of the population, have brought issues of race and immigration to the forefront of national debates.
The document discusses Jim Crow laws and their impact on racial segregation and discrimination in the United States between 1876 and 1965. It provides background on Jim Crow laws, examines how they disadvantaged black people, and discusses opposing views that argued segregation was constitutional if facilities were "separate but equal." However, the document rebuts this claim noting facilities for black people were always of much poorer quality. It concludes that while Jim Crow laws have ended, voting restrictions still oppress the black community and many obstacles remain.
The document discusses claims that were made about how legalized abortion would reduce crime rates and social problems. It summarizes evidence showing these claims were based on unsupported assumptions and did not account for abortion actually increasing out-of-wedlock births and unstable family structures, which are linked to higher crime rates. While abortion may have culled some high-risk demographics, this was more than offset by its unintended consequences of weakening social norms against premarital sex and non-marital childbearing.
The document discusses claims that were made about how legalized abortion would reduce crime rates and social problems. It summarizes evidence showing these claims were based on unsupported assumptions and did not account for abortion actually increasing out-of-wedlock births and unstable family structures, which are linked to higher crime rates. While abortion may have culled some high-risk demographics, this was more than offset by its unintended consequences of weakening social norms against premarital sex and non-marital childbearing.
The document discusses ethnicity and crime in the UK and USA. It provides statistics showing that ethnic minorities, particularly those of Afro-Caribbean descent, are overrepresented in crime statistics and the prison population compared to their percentage of the total population. However, victim surveys show that most crime is intra-ethnic. There are two main explanations for this: structural factors such as racism and economic marginalization increase criminality; or that discrimination in the criminal justice system results in ethnic minorities being disproportionately policed, arrested, and convicted.
The document discusses several topics related to politics and democracy:
1) A father tries to explain politics to his son by comparing their family roles to different parts of government. The son later says he understands that the president is taking advantage of the working class while the government does nothing.
2) Democracy is seen as a universal value by many around the world, and research shows it can aid development by fostering economic activity. However, some regions like the Middle East still lack democratic institutions that could help advance women's rights.
3) The speaker urges citizens to get involved in the political process through voting, as the government is facing large deficits that could lead to rising taxes if not addressed by the people working together
Racism is a complex phenomenon rooted in the history of modern states and the histories of colonialism and slavery. However, racism is often thought of as individual prejudice, an approach which sees racism as a psychological state of mind rather than a political phenomenon. Everyday racism can be seen in acts of violence, exploitation, discrimination, etc. – but it is not always overt. Indeed, much racism is covert, embedded in institutions such as the education system, healthcare, the police, etc. How can we identify racism in everyday situations? What tools of understanding do we need to identify a situation as racist or non-racist? In which ways does everyday racism affect the health and well-being of racialised people? What do we need to know about racism in order to address our prejudices?
This document discusses hate groups and hate crimes. It begins by outlining objectives of showing how dehumanization can take effect and what happens when individuals are set up to fail. It then provides definitions of hate crimes and hate groups under Canadian law. Several examples of hate groups are described on both the left and right sides of the political spectrum. Common rhetoric and propaganda methods used by these groups are examined, including dehumanization, authoritarian leadership, and the promotion of destructive ideologies. Statistics on hate crimes in Canada and locally in Toronto are also presented.
Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)John Lubbock
This document discusses democracy and human rights in the Gulf region. It argues that multi-party democracy may not always be the best system and could exacerbate divisions in some societies. Electoral systems that foster cooperation may better promote human rights and minority rights. While the Gulf states claim to have consultative bodies, real power remains concentrated among ruling families. Increased access to information is empowering human rights activists and calls for political reform will likely increase. Western strategic and commercial interests have discouraged candor on poor human rights records in the region.
The document summarizes key points from chapters 4-6 of Michelle Alexander's book "The New Jim Crow". It discusses how policies such as the War on Drugs have led to mass incarceration that disproportionately impacts African Americans. It notes that more black Americans are now under correctional control than were enslaved before the Civil War. It examines policies that restrict housing, employment, voting rights, and public assistance for those with criminal records, creating a racial caste system. It argues this system parallels Jim Crow by using race-neutral language to discriminate and by disenfranchising black communities. It calls for recognizing mass incarceration as a new system of racial control and mobilizing for large-scale reform rather than isolated
This summary provides the key points from the document in 3 sentences:
The document discusses the roots of riots and violence in marginalized communities through analyzing Martin Luther King Jr.'s writings on riots, a news article on police brutality in Baltimore, and themes in Richard Wright's novel Native Son. It argues that slow oppression, poverty, and police brutality build pressure over time that can lead to explosive outbursts of violence and riots. While riots are condemned, the document examines the social conditions and injustices that provoke such responses from disenfranchised groups that feel they have no other means of being heard.
Ethnic minorities and religious groups are over-represented in UK prisons relative to their population. Black people are 8 times more likely to be stopped and searched by police and 4 times more likely to be arrested than whites. Muslims make up 12% of the prison population but only 2% of the general UK population. The over-representation of minorities in the prison system could be linked to factors like poverty and discrimination in the legal system. However, the press has exaggerated fears about "Muslim gangs" in prisons; white gangs are also problematic.
How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in americaJoel Leon
This document discusses how fear and ignorance contributed to Donald Trump's election as president in 2016. It argues that white Americans felt threatened by demographic changes showing the U.S. will soon be a minority-majority country. The extreme right exploited these fears by portraying immigrants as threats. Trump reflected anxieties about preserving traditional American culture and values. However, the author believes this victory is ephemeral and the resistance to Trump's policies shows democracy is at an impasse in America.
This document summarizes a paper that examines police brutality against African Americans. It discusses several cases of unarmed black men being killed by police and finds that police are more likely to use force against black men. It argues that implicit racial bias permeates the criminal justice system and causes disproportionate policing and incarceration of African Americans. Statistics show black people are more often stopped and arrested for minor crimes. The document traces these issues back to slavery and Jim Crow laws and argues systemic racism remains deeply entrenched in the criminal justice system.
This document discusses hate crimes on college campuses and the challenges around balancing free speech rights with preventing hate speech. It provides examples of recent hate crimes like racist videos and threats targeted at students' race, gender or sexuality. While public universities must protect free speech, private schools can restrict speech through codes but these are often unconstitutional. The document recommends anti-bias education, free speech areas, and administrative leadership to thoughtfully address issues of hate rather than emotional shouting matches.
The document discusses the historical discrimination faced by the LGBTQ community in America and proposes adopting a new legal standard called the Modus Vivendi Nexus Standard to provide higher protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation under the Equal Protection Clause. It outlines how disgust and views of immorality were used politically to enact anti-gay laws and restrict LGBTQ rights. It also examines key legal and social developments, such as the gay rights movement in the late 1960s and the continued failure of the Constitution to adequately protect this group. The author argues the new standard is necessary to rectify purposeful discrimination and that it would require laws that discriminate based on sexual orientation to have an important government objective and be narrowly tailored without violating rights.
Hate crime (also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime)[1] is a prejudice-motivated crime which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of their membership (or perceived membership) of a certain social group or racial demographic.
Examples of such groups can include, and are almost exclusively limited to ethnicity, disability, language, nationality, physical appearance, religion, gender identity or sexual orientation.[2][3][4] Non-criminal actions that are motivated by these reasons are often called "bias incidents".
"Hate crime" generally refers to criminal acts which are seen to have been motivated by bias against one or more of the social groups listed above, or by bias against their derivatives. Incidents may involve physical assault, homicide, damage to property, bullying, harassment, verbal abuse (which includes slurs) or insults, mate crime or offensive graffiti or letters (hate mail).[5]
A hate crime law is a law intended to deter bias-motivated violence.[6] Hate crime laws are distinct from laws against hate speech: hate crime laws enhance the penalties associated with conduct which is already criminal under other laws, while hate speech laws criminalize a category of speech.
This ppt will help u in understanding hate crimes
Official crime statistics show that ethnic minorities, particularly black people, are overrepresented at various stages of the criminal justice system. Black people are much more likely to be stopped and searched by police, arrested, and imprisoned. However, statistics do not prove whether ethnic groups actually commit crimes at different rates or if overrepresentation is partly due to discrimination within the criminal justice system, such as disproportionate targeting by police. Explanations for differences in crime rates include sociological theories of marginalization, racism, and conflict perspectives, as well as debates around the accuracy and biases of official data.
This document discusses the history and impacts of mass incarceration of African Americans in the United States. It describes how after the abolition of slavery, the convict leasing system allowed private companies to exploit imprisoned African Americans for cheap labor, subjecting them to inhumane conditions and abuse. This laid the foundation for the modern prison industrial complex that disproportionately imprisons African Americans through discriminatory enforcement of drug and other laws. The document examines how mass incarceration has become a lucrative business that continues to negatively impact families and communities of color.
1. The document discusses how race continues to permeate and divide American society despite progress made through civil rights movements and the election of Barack Obama as the first black president.
2. It argues that viewing Obama's election as signaling a "post-racial" America is premature and overlooks ongoing racial disparities in areas like healthcare, earnings, the criminal justice system, and education.
3. The changing demographics of the U.S., with minorities making up 30% of the population, have brought issues of race and immigration to the forefront of national debates.
The document discusses Jim Crow laws and their impact on racial segregation and discrimination in the United States between 1876 and 1965. It provides background on Jim Crow laws, examines how they disadvantaged black people, and discusses opposing views that argued segregation was constitutional if facilities were "separate but equal." However, the document rebuts this claim noting facilities for black people were always of much poorer quality. It concludes that while Jim Crow laws have ended, voting restrictions still oppress the black community and many obstacles remain.
1. Notes for a sermon preached for Grace Church Van Vorst, Jersey City, New Jersey, on 21
October 2012 (Proper 24B), by the Rev. Dr. J. Barrington Bates, Interim Rector.
“Whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever
wishes to be first among you must be slave of all.”
Jesus’ words in today’s gospel story are very challenging, aren’t they?
They are about putting ourselves and our needs after those of others—something we
are often reluctant to do and something our society quite simply abhors.
Throughout the course of human history, it’s been pretty rare for people to seek to be
a servant or a slave of others.
There are those rare and wonderful exceptions: not only Jesus, but—just to name a
few recent examples—Mohandas Gandhi and Mother Teresa come to mind. People
who believed that helping the poor find a leg up was more important than acquiring
things or money or power. People who sacrificed of their own lives in order to help
others.
But they are the exceptions, right?
Most of the time, let’s face it, we humans have done quite the opposite. Our ancestors
sought ways to demean and devalue others, to control their lives, and to use their
labor to contribute to our wealth.
Consider the abomination of slavery in this country.
This great democracy, founded on the principle that all persons are created equal and
are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, … among these are life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
I was quoting from our Declaration of Independence, of course.
In spite of this, let’s look at the record.
In 1860, just before the outbreak of the Civil War, fully 83 per cent of nonwhite
persons in this country were slaves.
Just 360 thousand out of a total of 2.1 million were free. And that 360,000 would have
included a large proportion of Native Americans.
Our past is a scandal, really.
So, you’d think things would improve after the war ended in 1865. We passed the Civil
Rights Act of 1866, bestowing full citizenship on African Americans; we adopted the
Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution, prohibiting states from denying citizens
due process and equal protection of the law; we adopted the Fifteenth Amendment,
providing that the right to vote cannot be denied on account of race; and we adopted
federal Ku Klux Klan Acts, which declared interference with voting a federal offence
and the violation of civil rights a crime.
2. It all sounds so good—and many people benefited from these changes. By 187o, at just
a few years into the Reconstruction Era, at least fifteen per cent of all Southern elected
officials were black. All was finally perfect, put right. God’s justice being done.
Except that what we now categorize as Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation
and prevented many people of color from exercising their right to vote through poll
taxes, literacy tests, and felon-disenfranchisement laws.
And racial segregation—whether legislatively imposed or enforced through implicit
social covenant—rendered the experience of most black folks invisible to whites,
making it easier to maintain racial stereotypes and to ignore their suffering.
So we had another wave of legislation, with the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
This barred unequal application of voter-registration requirements, outlawed
discrimination, and led to the desegregation of our public schools.
It all sounds so good—and many people benefitted from these changes.
All was finally perfect, put right. God’s justice being done.
Except that something else happened. I am indebted to author Michelle Alexander
and her masterful book The New Jim Crow for my statistics and insights here.
President Lyndon Johnson argued during his 1964 presidential campaign against Barry
Goldwater that antipoverty programs were, in effect, anticrime programs.
But, following him, President Richard Nixon called on voters to reject the lawlessness
of civil rights and embrace “order” here in the United States. He served two terms—or
most of two terms.
And in his campaign for the presidency in 1980, Ronald Reagan mastered the excision
of the language of race from conservative public discourse. Instead of making explicit
reference to race, he referred to “welfare queens” and “criminal predators.” He ran on
a platform of restoring “law and order” to our nation, and he declared the federal
government’s “war on drugs” in 1982.
At the time, fewer than two per cent of the American public viewed drugs as the most
important issue facing the nation.
Nevertheless, an extraordinary expansion of the federal governments law-enforcement
activities and power followed.
Just so we are clear: between 1980 and 1984, FBI antidrug funding increased from 8 to
$95 million, while Department of Education antidrug funds were cut from 14 to $3
million.
And, as law-enforcement budgets exploded, so did prison and jail populations.
By 1991, the number of people behind bars in the United States was unprecedented in
world history, and one-fourth of young African American men were now under the
control of the criminal-justice system—in jail or prison, under parole or probation.
3. To put this in perspective, there are now more people in prisons and jails just for drug
offences than were incarcerated for all reasons in 1980.
More African American adults are under correctional control today than were
enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.
We tell ourselves that they “deserve” their fate, except that whites are just as likely to
commit many crimes, especially drug crimes.
According to Project America, a nonpartisan organization providing easy access to
information about our country, black males are incarcerated at a rate more than 6½
times that of white males.
“The War on Drugs is the vehicle through which extraordinary number of black men
are forced into the cage.”
It is a caste system no less insidious than slavery, no less immoral than Jim Crow.
Like those demonic systems of human oppression, the mass incarceration of African
Americans in this country has created a closed circuit of perpetual marginality.
And all three systems—slavery, Jim Crow, and mass incarceration—arose from a
desire among white elites to exploit the resentments, vulnerabilities, and racial biases
of poor and working-class whites for their own political and economic gain.
We can no longer say a black man is four-fifths of a white man, or sanction the sinister
doctrine of “separate but equal,” or use certain terms that demean and degrade whole
segments of humanity—but, by God, that oppression continues.
And, according to Ms. Alexander, “The genius of the current caste system, and what
most distinguishes it from its predecessors, is that it appears voluntary. People choose
to commit crimes, and that’s why they are locked up or locked out, we are told. This
feature makes the politics of responsibility particularly tempting, as it appears the
system can be avoided with good behavior. But herein lies the trap. All people make
mistakes. All of us are sinners. … In fact, if the worst thing you have ever done is speed
ten miles over the speed limit on the freeway, you have put yourself and others at
more risk of harm than someone smoking marijuana in the privacy of his or her living
room. Yet there are people in the United States serving life sentences for first-time
drug offences, something virtually unheard of anywhere else in the world.”
Read the book: The New Jim Crow.
Become involved in the political process.
As Martin Luther King, Jr., cautioned us, racial justice requires the complete
transformation of social institutions and a dramatic restricting of our economy, not
superficial changes that can be purchased on the cheap.
So let us commit ourselves to become servant of all, and slave of all—working
together to see that God’s justice is done, on earth as in heaven.