SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Notes for a sermon preached for Grace Church Van Vorst, Jersey City, New Jersey, on 21
October 2012 (Proper 24B), by the Rev. Dr. J. Barrington Bates, Interim Rector.
“Whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever
wishes to be first among you must be slave of all.”
Jesus’ words in today’s gospel story are very challenging, aren’t they?
They are about putting ourselves and our needs after those of others—something we
are often reluctant to do and something our society quite simply abhors.
Throughout the course of human history, it’s been pretty rare for people to seek to be
a servant or a slave of others.
There are those rare and wonderful exceptions: not only Jesus, but—just to name a
few recent examples—Mohandas Gandhi and Mother Teresa come to mind. People
who believed that helping the poor find a leg up was more important than acquiring
things or money or power. People who sacrificed of their own lives in order to help
others.
But they are the exceptions, right?
Most of the time, let’s face it, we humans have done quite the opposite. Our ancestors
sought ways to demean and devalue others, to control their lives, and to use their
labor to contribute to our wealth.
Consider the abomination of slavery in this country.
This great democracy, founded on the principle that all persons are created equal and
are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, … among these are life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
I was quoting from our Declaration of Independence, of course.
In spite of this, let’s look at the record.
In 1860, just before the outbreak of the Civil War, fully 83 per cent of nonwhite
persons in this country were slaves.
Just 360 thousand out of a total of 2.1 million were free. And that 360,000 would have
included a large proportion of Native Americans.
Our past is a scandal, really.
So, you’d think things would improve after the war ended in 1865. We passed the Civil
Rights Act of 1866, bestowing full citizenship on African Americans; we adopted the
Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution, prohibiting states from denying citizens
due process and equal protection of the law; we adopted the Fifteenth Amendment,
providing that the right to vote cannot be denied on account of race; and we adopted
federal Ku Klux Klan Acts, which declared interference with voting a federal offence
and the violation of civil rights a crime.
It all sounds so good—and many people benefited from these changes. By 187o, at just
a few years into the Reconstruction Era, at least fifteen per cent of all Southern elected
officials were black. All was finally perfect, put right. God’s justice being done.
Except that what we now categorize as Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation
and prevented many people of color from exercising their right to vote through poll
taxes, literacy tests, and felon-disenfranchisement laws.
And racial segregation—whether legislatively imposed or enforced through implicit
social covenant—rendered the experience of most black folks invisible to whites,
making it easier to maintain racial stereotypes and to ignore their suffering.
So we had another wave of legislation, with the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
This barred unequal application of voter-registration requirements, outlawed
discrimination, and led to the desegregation of our public schools.
It all sounds so good—and many people benefitted from these changes.
All was finally perfect, put right. God’s justice being done.
Except that something else happened. I am indebted to author Michelle Alexander
and her masterful book The New Jim Crow for my statistics and insights here.
President Lyndon Johnson argued during his 1964 presidential campaign against Barry
Goldwater that antipoverty programs were, in effect, anticrime programs.
But, following him, President Richard Nixon called on voters to reject the lawlessness
of civil rights and embrace “order” here in the United States. He served two terms—or
most of two terms.
And in his campaign for the presidency in 1980, Ronald Reagan mastered the excision
of the language of race from conservative public discourse. Instead of making explicit
reference to race, he referred to “welfare queens” and “criminal predators.” He ran on
a platform of restoring “law and order” to our nation, and he declared the federal
government’s “war on drugs” in 1982.
At the time, fewer than two per cent of the American public viewed drugs as the most
important issue facing the nation.
Nevertheless, an extraordinary expansion of the federal governments law-enforcement
activities and power followed.
Just so we are clear: between 1980 and 1984, FBI antidrug funding increased from 8 to
$95 million, while Department of Education antidrug funds were cut from 14 to $3
million.
And, as law-enforcement budgets exploded, so did prison and jail populations.
By 1991, the number of people behind bars in the United States was unprecedented in
world history, and one-fourth of young African American men were now under the
control of the criminal-justice system—in jail or prison, under parole or probation.
To put this in perspective, there are now more people in prisons and jails just for drug
offences than were incarcerated for all reasons in 1980.
More African American adults are under correctional control today than were
enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.
We tell ourselves that they “deserve” their fate, except that whites are just as likely to
commit many crimes, especially drug crimes.
According to Project America, a nonpartisan organization providing easy access to
information about our country, black males are incarcerated at a rate more than 6½
times that of white males.
“The War on Drugs is the vehicle through which extraordinary number of black men
are forced into the cage.”
It is a caste system no less insidious than slavery, no less immoral than Jim Crow.
Like those demonic systems of human oppression, the mass incarceration of African
Americans in this country has created a closed circuit of perpetual marginality.
And all three systems—slavery, Jim Crow, and mass incarceration—arose from a
desire among white elites to exploit the resentments, vulnerabilities, and racial biases
of poor and working-class whites for their own political and economic gain.
We can no longer say a black man is four-fifths of a white man, or sanction the sinister
doctrine of “separate but equal,” or use certain terms that demean and degrade whole
segments of humanity—but, by God, that oppression continues.
And, according to Ms. Alexander, “The genius of the current caste system, and what
most distinguishes it from its predecessors, is that it appears voluntary. People choose
to commit crimes, and that’s why they are locked up or locked out, we are told. This
feature makes the politics of responsibility particularly tempting, as it appears the
system can be avoided with good behavior. But herein lies the trap. All people make
mistakes. All of us are sinners. … In fact, if the worst thing you have ever done is speed
ten miles over the speed limit on the freeway, you have put yourself and others at
more risk of harm than someone smoking marijuana in the privacy of his or her living
room. Yet there are people in the United States serving life sentences for first-time
drug offences, something virtually unheard of anywhere else in the world.”
Read the book: The New Jim Crow.
Become involved in the political process.
As Martin Luther King, Jr., cautioned us, racial justice requires the complete
transformation of social institutions and a dramatic restricting of our economy, not
superficial changes that can be purchased on the cheap.
So let us commit ourselves to become servant of all, and slave of all—working
together to see that God’s justice is done, on earth as in heaven.

More Related Content

What's hot

Crime
CrimeCrime
Crime
hlilibrary
 
Crime
CrimeCrime
Crime
hlilibrary
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
sociologyexchange.co.uk
 
Hate crimes
Hate crimesHate crimes
Your arguement, your vote
Your arguement, your voteYour arguement, your vote
Your arguement, your vote
guestb9a026
 
Everyday racism
Everyday racismEveryday racism
Everyday racism
Alana Lentin
 
Persuasion of Hate
Persuasion of HatePersuasion of Hate
Persuasion of Hate
Jmclea01
 
Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)
Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)
Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)
John Lubbock
 
The New Jim Crow
The New Jim Crow  The New Jim Crow
The New Jim Crow
Daniel Smith-Kirkham
 
BaltimoreDetroitChicago
BaltimoreDetroitChicagoBaltimoreDetroitChicago
BaltimoreDetroitChicago
Ashley Weaver
 
Prison minorities kay
Prison minorities kayPrison minorities kay
Prison minorities kay
Dani Cathro
 
How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in america
How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in americaHow fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in america
How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in america
Joel Leon
 
620 Police Brutality
620 Police Brutality620 Police Brutality
620 Police Brutality
Miriam Holbrook
 
Hate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On CampusHate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On Campus
Mark Litwa
 
Thesispub
ThesispubThesispub
Hate crimes in india 2021
Hate crimes in india 2021Hate crimes in india 2021
Hate crimes in india 2021
LavikaGoyal3
 
Ethnicity and crime
Ethnicity and crimeEthnicity and crime
Ethnicity and crime
smccormac7
 
Mass Incarceration
Mass IncarcerationMass Incarceration
Mass Incarceration
Charles Rohan Sharma
 
TheIssueOfRaceInAmerica.doc
TheIssueOfRaceInAmerica.docTheIssueOfRaceInAmerica.doc
TheIssueOfRaceInAmerica.doc
Renee Yearwood
 
The rise above
The rise above The rise above
The rise above
janaylatese
 

What's hot (20)

Crime
CrimeCrime
Crime
 
Crime
CrimeCrime
Crime
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Hate crimes
Hate crimesHate crimes
Hate crimes
 
Your arguement, your vote
Your arguement, your voteYour arguement, your vote
Your arguement, your vote
 
Everyday racism
Everyday racismEveryday racism
Everyday racism
 
Persuasion of Hate
Persuasion of HatePersuasion of Hate
Persuasion of Hate
 
Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)
Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)
Democracy and Human Rights in the Gulf: Can they be achieved? (1995)
 
The New Jim Crow
The New Jim Crow  The New Jim Crow
The New Jim Crow
 
BaltimoreDetroitChicago
BaltimoreDetroitChicagoBaltimoreDetroitChicago
BaltimoreDetroitChicago
 
Prison minorities kay
Prison minorities kayPrison minorities kay
Prison minorities kay
 
How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in america
How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in americaHow fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in america
How fear and ignorance birth the unpredictable in america
 
620 Police Brutality
620 Police Brutality620 Police Brutality
620 Police Brutality
 
Hate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On CampusHate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On Campus
 
Thesispub
ThesispubThesispub
Thesispub
 
Hate crimes in india 2021
Hate crimes in india 2021Hate crimes in india 2021
Hate crimes in india 2021
 
Ethnicity and crime
Ethnicity and crimeEthnicity and crime
Ethnicity and crime
 
Mass Incarceration
Mass IncarcerationMass Incarceration
Mass Incarceration
 
TheIssueOfRaceInAmerica.doc
TheIssueOfRaceInAmerica.docTheIssueOfRaceInAmerica.doc
TheIssueOfRaceInAmerica.doc
 
The rise above
The rise above The rise above
The rise above
 

The New Jim Crow

  • 1. Notes for a sermon preached for Grace Church Van Vorst, Jersey City, New Jersey, on 21 October 2012 (Proper 24B), by the Rev. Dr. J. Barrington Bates, Interim Rector. “Whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be slave of all.” Jesus’ words in today’s gospel story are very challenging, aren’t they? They are about putting ourselves and our needs after those of others—something we are often reluctant to do and something our society quite simply abhors. Throughout the course of human history, it’s been pretty rare for people to seek to be a servant or a slave of others. There are those rare and wonderful exceptions: not only Jesus, but—just to name a few recent examples—Mohandas Gandhi and Mother Teresa come to mind. People who believed that helping the poor find a leg up was more important than acquiring things or money or power. People who sacrificed of their own lives in order to help others. But they are the exceptions, right? Most of the time, let’s face it, we humans have done quite the opposite. Our ancestors sought ways to demean and devalue others, to control their lives, and to use their labor to contribute to our wealth. Consider the abomination of slavery in this country. This great democracy, founded on the principle that all persons are created equal and are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, … among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I was quoting from our Declaration of Independence, of course. In spite of this, let’s look at the record. In 1860, just before the outbreak of the Civil War, fully 83 per cent of nonwhite persons in this country were slaves. Just 360 thousand out of a total of 2.1 million were free. And that 360,000 would have included a large proportion of Native Americans. Our past is a scandal, really. So, you’d think things would improve after the war ended in 1865. We passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, bestowing full citizenship on African Americans; we adopted the Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution, prohibiting states from denying citizens due process and equal protection of the law; we adopted the Fifteenth Amendment, providing that the right to vote cannot be denied on account of race; and we adopted federal Ku Klux Klan Acts, which declared interference with voting a federal offence and the violation of civil rights a crime.
  • 2. It all sounds so good—and many people benefited from these changes. By 187o, at just a few years into the Reconstruction Era, at least fifteen per cent of all Southern elected officials were black. All was finally perfect, put right. God’s justice being done. Except that what we now categorize as Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation and prevented many people of color from exercising their right to vote through poll taxes, literacy tests, and felon-disenfranchisement laws. And racial segregation—whether legislatively imposed or enforced through implicit social covenant—rendered the experience of most black folks invisible to whites, making it easier to maintain racial stereotypes and to ignore their suffering. So we had another wave of legislation, with the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This barred unequal application of voter-registration requirements, outlawed discrimination, and led to the desegregation of our public schools. It all sounds so good—and many people benefitted from these changes. All was finally perfect, put right. God’s justice being done. Except that something else happened. I am indebted to author Michelle Alexander and her masterful book The New Jim Crow for my statistics and insights here. President Lyndon Johnson argued during his 1964 presidential campaign against Barry Goldwater that antipoverty programs were, in effect, anticrime programs. But, following him, President Richard Nixon called on voters to reject the lawlessness of civil rights and embrace “order” here in the United States. He served two terms—or most of two terms. And in his campaign for the presidency in 1980, Ronald Reagan mastered the excision of the language of race from conservative public discourse. Instead of making explicit reference to race, he referred to “welfare queens” and “criminal predators.” He ran on a platform of restoring “law and order” to our nation, and he declared the federal government’s “war on drugs” in 1982. At the time, fewer than two per cent of the American public viewed drugs as the most important issue facing the nation. Nevertheless, an extraordinary expansion of the federal governments law-enforcement activities and power followed. Just so we are clear: between 1980 and 1984, FBI antidrug funding increased from 8 to $95 million, while Department of Education antidrug funds were cut from 14 to $3 million. And, as law-enforcement budgets exploded, so did prison and jail populations. By 1991, the number of people behind bars in the United States was unprecedented in world history, and one-fourth of young African American men were now under the control of the criminal-justice system—in jail or prison, under parole or probation.
  • 3. To put this in perspective, there are now more people in prisons and jails just for drug offences than were incarcerated for all reasons in 1980. More African American adults are under correctional control today than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began. We tell ourselves that they “deserve” their fate, except that whites are just as likely to commit many crimes, especially drug crimes. According to Project America, a nonpartisan organization providing easy access to information about our country, black males are incarcerated at a rate more than 6½ times that of white males. “The War on Drugs is the vehicle through which extraordinary number of black men are forced into the cage.” It is a caste system no less insidious than slavery, no less immoral than Jim Crow. Like those demonic systems of human oppression, the mass incarceration of African Americans in this country has created a closed circuit of perpetual marginality. And all three systems—slavery, Jim Crow, and mass incarceration—arose from a desire among white elites to exploit the resentments, vulnerabilities, and racial biases of poor and working-class whites for their own political and economic gain. We can no longer say a black man is four-fifths of a white man, or sanction the sinister doctrine of “separate but equal,” or use certain terms that demean and degrade whole segments of humanity—but, by God, that oppression continues. And, according to Ms. Alexander, “The genius of the current caste system, and what most distinguishes it from its predecessors, is that it appears voluntary. People choose to commit crimes, and that’s why they are locked up or locked out, we are told. This feature makes the politics of responsibility particularly tempting, as it appears the system can be avoided with good behavior. But herein lies the trap. All people make mistakes. All of us are sinners. … In fact, if the worst thing you have ever done is speed ten miles over the speed limit on the freeway, you have put yourself and others at more risk of harm than someone smoking marijuana in the privacy of his or her living room. Yet there are people in the United States serving life sentences for first-time drug offences, something virtually unheard of anywhere else in the world.” Read the book: The New Jim Crow. Become involved in the political process. As Martin Luther King, Jr., cautioned us, racial justice requires the complete transformation of social institutions and a dramatic restricting of our economy, not superficial changes that can be purchased on the cheap. So let us commit ourselves to become servant of all, and slave of all—working together to see that God’s justice is done, on earth as in heaven.