Here's the question: Discuss the evolutionary explanations of aggressive behaviour. (24 marks)
The slideshare is the answer.
Got almost full marks.
A01, A02 AND A03 is separated to make life easier!
You're welcome :)
Evolutionary explanations of human aggression (2)Angeline David
1) Two evolutionary explanations for aggression are proposed: mate retention strategies to deter infidelity like mate guarding and violence, and murder solving adaptive problems like preventing harm to oneself and family or protecting resources.
2) Research finds males use more coercive mate retention tactics like threats of violence while females use verbal possession, and mate retention predicts violence against women. However, the link between jealousy and violence is complex.
3) Murder is explained as solving adaptive problems for ancestors like preventing harm, managing reputation, and protecting resources. Research finds males tend to kill males as rivals while females kill abusive partners, and predisposing factors are sexual jealousy, lack of resources, and threats to male status.
The evolutionary explanation of aggression suggests that aggression evolved to increase reproductive success and the passing on of genes to future generations. Specifically, it proposes that:
- Male aggression is driven by sexual jealousy and the desire to prevent being "cuckolded" by investing resources in offspring that are not their own.
- Male-male competition and aggression over access to females increased as males sought to gain status and reproductive opportunities.
- Territorial aggression and xenophobia against outsiders also evolved to protect resources for one's own group.
However, the explanation is reductionist and does not account for individual differences in aggression or cultural differences in behavior. It also raises ethical issues about free will versus determinism.
The document discusses evolutionary explanations for different types of human aggression. It describes Lorenz's theory that aggression evolved to increase reproductive success through mate competition and territorial defense. Studies support ideas that sexual jealousy and competition for resources and status drive aggression in males. The document also examines group displays of aggression in sports crowds, lynch mobs, and religious/cultural rituals, applying evolutionary concepts like in-group favoritism, costly signaling of commitment, and the power-threat hypothesis to explain these behaviors. While some evidence supports evolutionary views, alternative factors like culture and individual differences are also acknowledged.
Abridged version of the slides of a talk on the intersection of feminism, hip hop and science (sexual selection).
More info about the presentation:
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/urban-scientist/2012/12/03/intersection-of-culture-and-science-hiphop-feminism-sex-sexual-selection/
and
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/urban-scientist/2012/11/27/sexual-politics-of-hip-hop-reexamined-as-lessons-in-sexual-selection/
This document discusses how childhood exposure to violence can affect adolescent dating violence. It begins by defining dating violence and stating the thesis that boys exposed to violence are more likely to be violent in their own relationships. Possible causes discussed include gender socialization, modeling aggressive behavior witnessed at home, motivation and reinforcement of violence, traditional gender stereotypes, and acceptance of violence in some cultures. The document considers evidence that while girls commit dating violence too, boys are generally more aggressive and prone to violence. It concludes by suggesting solutions like education, counseling, and training professionals.
The document discusses several evolutionary explanations for human aggression. It describes Lorenz's view that aggression serves three functions - increasing reproductive success, defending sexual partners from cuckoldry through mate retention strategies, and competing with other males over territory and resources. It also discusses research finding links between mate retention behaviors and violence, age/resources/status and male-male homicide rates, and how female aggression tends to be verbal rather than physical. The document outlines that aggression may have evolved from drives to ensure in-group survival through xenophobia.
THREE KEY EXPLANATIONS FOR GENDER PATTERNS IN CRIMEmattyp99
1. Four key theories are discussed to explain patterns in female crime: functionalist sex role theory, control theory, class and gender deals theory, and the changing women's role or 'liberation thesis'.
2. Functionalist sex role theory argues that differential socialization patterns result in boys being more disposed to violence and crime. Control theory suggests that patriarchal social control mechanisms reduce crime opportunities for women.
3. Class and gender deals theory proposes that working class women commit more serious crimes when rewards for conformity through class and gender deals are unavailable.
4. The liberation thesis argues that as patriarchy weakens and women take on more male roles, female crime rates have risen; however, critics argue this
This document discusses theories around why most crime is committed by males. It summarizes the work of criminologists Maureen Cain, Bob Connell, and James Messerschmidt who link crime to concepts of masculinity and gender roles. Specifically, they argue that there is a dominant and idealized form of masculinity (hegemonic masculinity) that some males feel pressure to achieve through actions like paid work, subordinating women, and demonstrating an uncontrollable sex drive. For some males, especially those lacking other resources, crime and deviance may be ways to accomplish this ideal form of masculinity and prove themselves as men. The theories are criticized for being circular, overpredicting crime, and potentially overgeneralizing
Evolutionary explanations of human aggression (2)Angeline David
1) Two evolutionary explanations for aggression are proposed: mate retention strategies to deter infidelity like mate guarding and violence, and murder solving adaptive problems like preventing harm to oneself and family or protecting resources.
2) Research finds males use more coercive mate retention tactics like threats of violence while females use verbal possession, and mate retention predicts violence against women. However, the link between jealousy and violence is complex.
3) Murder is explained as solving adaptive problems for ancestors like preventing harm, managing reputation, and protecting resources. Research finds males tend to kill males as rivals while females kill abusive partners, and predisposing factors are sexual jealousy, lack of resources, and threats to male status.
The evolutionary explanation of aggression suggests that aggression evolved to increase reproductive success and the passing on of genes to future generations. Specifically, it proposes that:
- Male aggression is driven by sexual jealousy and the desire to prevent being "cuckolded" by investing resources in offspring that are not their own.
- Male-male competition and aggression over access to females increased as males sought to gain status and reproductive opportunities.
- Territorial aggression and xenophobia against outsiders also evolved to protect resources for one's own group.
However, the explanation is reductionist and does not account for individual differences in aggression or cultural differences in behavior. It also raises ethical issues about free will versus determinism.
The document discusses evolutionary explanations for different types of human aggression. It describes Lorenz's theory that aggression evolved to increase reproductive success through mate competition and territorial defense. Studies support ideas that sexual jealousy and competition for resources and status drive aggression in males. The document also examines group displays of aggression in sports crowds, lynch mobs, and religious/cultural rituals, applying evolutionary concepts like in-group favoritism, costly signaling of commitment, and the power-threat hypothesis to explain these behaviors. While some evidence supports evolutionary views, alternative factors like culture and individual differences are also acknowledged.
Abridged version of the slides of a talk on the intersection of feminism, hip hop and science (sexual selection).
More info about the presentation:
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/urban-scientist/2012/12/03/intersection-of-culture-and-science-hiphop-feminism-sex-sexual-selection/
and
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/urban-scientist/2012/11/27/sexual-politics-of-hip-hop-reexamined-as-lessons-in-sexual-selection/
This document discusses how childhood exposure to violence can affect adolescent dating violence. It begins by defining dating violence and stating the thesis that boys exposed to violence are more likely to be violent in their own relationships. Possible causes discussed include gender socialization, modeling aggressive behavior witnessed at home, motivation and reinforcement of violence, traditional gender stereotypes, and acceptance of violence in some cultures. The document considers evidence that while girls commit dating violence too, boys are generally more aggressive and prone to violence. It concludes by suggesting solutions like education, counseling, and training professionals.
The document discusses several evolutionary explanations for human aggression. It describes Lorenz's view that aggression serves three functions - increasing reproductive success, defending sexual partners from cuckoldry through mate retention strategies, and competing with other males over territory and resources. It also discusses research finding links between mate retention behaviors and violence, age/resources/status and male-male homicide rates, and how female aggression tends to be verbal rather than physical. The document outlines that aggression may have evolved from drives to ensure in-group survival through xenophobia.
THREE KEY EXPLANATIONS FOR GENDER PATTERNS IN CRIMEmattyp99
1. Four key theories are discussed to explain patterns in female crime: functionalist sex role theory, control theory, class and gender deals theory, and the changing women's role or 'liberation thesis'.
2. Functionalist sex role theory argues that differential socialization patterns result in boys being more disposed to violence and crime. Control theory suggests that patriarchal social control mechanisms reduce crime opportunities for women.
3. Class and gender deals theory proposes that working class women commit more serious crimes when rewards for conformity through class and gender deals are unavailable.
4. The liberation thesis argues that as patriarchy weakens and women take on more male roles, female crime rates have risen; however, critics argue this
This document discusses theories around why most crime is committed by males. It summarizes the work of criminologists Maureen Cain, Bob Connell, and James Messerschmidt who link crime to concepts of masculinity and gender roles. Specifically, they argue that there is a dominant and idealized form of masculinity (hegemonic masculinity) that some males feel pressure to achieve through actions like paid work, subordinating women, and demonstrating an uncontrollable sex drive. For some males, especially those lacking other resources, crime and deviance may be ways to accomplish this ideal form of masculinity and prove themselves as men. The theories are criticized for being circular, overpredicting crime, and potentially overgeneralizing
Psychological explanations of gender development: Cognitive development theory, inc. Kohlberg and Gender schema theory.
Biological influences on gender, including hormones, evolutionary, and biosocial approach to gender dysphoria
Social influences on gender, including parents, peers, and cultural influences on gender role
The document discusses the biosocial approach to gender development, which views both biological and social factors as important in determining gender identity and behavior. Specifically:
- Gender is determined by an interaction between innate biological factors (such as sex) and environmental/social influences (like differential treatment based on sex).
- Perceptions of a child's biological sex influence how they are treated and socialized by parents and others, meaning gender is partly socially constructed.
- Studies demonstrate that adults respond differently to infants based on perceptions of their biological sex, and this influences the child's environment.
Women commit less crime than men, but the gap is closing. Women tend to commit different types of crimes like shoplifting, receiving stolen goods, and prostitution, while men more commonly commit violent crimes, sex crimes, and burglary. Statistics show men are far more likely to be convicted of crimes and to be repeat offenders. However, some argue female crimes may be less likely to be reported or prosecuted compared to male crimes. Sociological explanations for differences in male and female criminality include socialization into different gender roles, the effects of patriarchal control over women, and theories that women's crime rates may increase as patriarchal control diminishes.
This document discusses gender patterns in crime based on official statistics and sociological theories. The key points are:
- Official statistics show males are far more likely to be convicted of crimes than females. However, some argue these statistics underestimate female offending.
- There are three main questions raised: do women really commit fewer crimes; how do we explain female criminality; and why do males commit more crimes?
- Theories to explain gender differences in crime include functionalist sex role theory, patriarchal control theory, and the liberation thesis. Masculinity is also discussed as a factor in male criminality.
1. There are three key sociological explanations for differences in female criminality: functionalist sex role theory, control theory, and the changing women's role or 'liberation thesis'.
2. Functionalist sex role theory argues that women are socialized differently than men and taught to be nurturing rather than aggressive, which makes criminal behavior less likely. Control theory suggests that tighter social controls on women through patriarchal structures reduce opportunities for crime.
3. The changing women's role thesis proposes that as women take on more 'male' roles in society and experience greater liberation, female crime rates have risen as social controls have weakened. However, critics argue that most female criminals are still working class women who are least
This document discusses heterosexual society's negative views of bisexuality. It identifies three primary reasons for discrimination against bisexuals: seeing them as promiscuous, feeling threatened by open sexuality, and assuming sexuality is dichotomous rather than a continuum. Negative attitudes were exacerbated by the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s and 90s. Men tend to be more biphobic than women as a way to affirm their masculinity by rejecting what is seen as unmanly. While some bisexual activity arises from desire, others engage in it due to comfort, necessity, or opportunity without intimacy. Overall, resentment toward bisexuals stems from cultural influences, beliefs, and ignorance of stereotypes.
This document discusses gender differences in aggressive behavior. It first establishes that statistics show men are more likely than women to commit violent crimes. It then explores some possible explanations for this difference, including social learning theory, deindividuation, institutionalization, and biological factors like levels of testosterone. The author argues that both environmental and biological factors likely contribute to gender differences in aggression.
The Investment Model proposes that commitment to a relationship is predicted by satisfaction, quality of alternatives, and investment. Satisfaction is determined by rewards minus costs. Investment includes resources like shared friends, property, and emotional attachment that would be lost if the relationship ended. Research found students more committed when satisfaction and investments were higher. The model was also applied to abusive relationships, finding highest commitment when investment was high but alternatives were low. However, the model is reductionist in assuming people are purely rational and does not account for differences in expected investments by gender or culture.
This document discusses theories around gender differences in crime and deviance. It notes that official crime statistics show most recorded crimes are committed by men. Various explanations for this are discussed, including biological theories, socialization/sex role theories, social control theories, and lack of opportunities. More recently, postmodern theories have looked at concepts like transgression. Theories have also examined how masculinity relates to crime, with some men feeling pressure to demonstrate aggression, control, and oppositional behavior to affirm their masculinity.
Sex-role theory and social control theory are two major approaches to explaining gender differences in criminal behavior. According to sex-role theory, boys and girls are socialized differently from a young age, with boys encouraged to take risks and be tough/aggressive, making them more likely to commit crimes. Females face closer social control from a young age, making them less likely to deviate from social norms. Feminist theorists criticize these approaches for failing to consider gender power differences and propose alternative theories like transgression theory, which examines activities that harm women and how gender roles are socially constructed to limit women's opportunities and freedom.
During a UN-sponsored seminar on sexual violence against men and boys in conflict Prof. Lara Stemple of UCLA discussed some of the research gaps that exist in the are of male-directed sexual violence.
Is the Criminal Justice System biased towards or against women?mattyp99
The document discusses evidence for and against the "chivalry thesis" which asserts that women are treated more leniently than men by the criminal justice system. Evidence for it includes self-report studies showing smaller differences in admitted crimes between men and women than official statistics. Evidence against includes arguments that the criminal justice system is biased against women, for example by scrutinizing female victims of crimes like rape more than male perpetrators. Overall, the document suggests the criminal justice system may treat men and women differently based on societal gender norms and expectations.
The document discusses rape culture in the U.S. It argues that preferential treatment given to men, especially white men resembling hegemonic masculinity, leads to a sense of entitlement that is a major factor in rape culture. Media like music videos teach that objectifying women is acceptable and that women exist only to serve men. Sports culture, exemplified by hockey, promotes misogynistic views where sexual aggression towards women is routine. Religions are also androcentric, viewing women as inferior and meant to obey men, contributing to the belief that women's bodies naturally belong to men. Changing this socialization will require eliminating the gender role hierarchy and paradigm of masculinity as domination.
This document discusses definitions related to gender identity, gender expression, sex, and sexual orientation. It notes that gender identity refers to one's internal sense of gender, which may differ from their sex assigned at birth. Sexual orientation refers to romantic or sexual attraction toward other people and exists on a spectrum. The document emphasizes that major medical and mental health professional organizations do not consider homosexuality a mental disorder and that efforts to change sexual orientation through conversion or reparative therapy have been found ineffective and potentially harmful.
1) Males commit significantly more crimes than females according to official crime statistics. Males are more likely to reoffend, have longer criminal careers, and commit more serious offenses.
2) The chivalry theory proposes that the criminal justice system treats females more leniently due to protective attitudes towards women, but some studies have found no evidence of leniency in sentencing.
3) Explanations for gender differences in crime include sex role theory, which links it to traditional gender roles, and patriarchal control theory, which argues that patriarchal control over women reduces their opportunities and freedom to offend.
Gender and crime revision crime and deviance A2- Lay out for an essaymillieprice1
The document discusses several sociological theories about gender differences in criminal behavior. It notes that early theorists like Adler and Heidenschins argued that women had less opportunity to commit crimes because they were typically confined to the home. However, as women have taken on more roles outside the home, there are now new opportunities for female criminal behavior. It also discusses gender role theory and how societies encourage more risk-taking and aggressive behaviors in boys that may expose them to criminal acts. Theories about masculinity and how crime allows males to demonstrate masculinity are also covered. Different views are presented on whether female offenders are treated more leniently or harshly by the criminal justice system compared to men.
The document discusses several topics related to discrimination and marginalized groups:
1) It describes how school discipline policies disproportionately affect students of color and can funnel them into the criminal justice system through the school-to-prison pipeline.
2) It discusses how disability diagnoses are sometimes used to label and track students of color, exacerbating racial disparities.
3) It outlines the fear and stress experienced by immigrant families under recent immigration policies, which negatively impacts their health, well-being, and daily lives.
This document summarizes current research on mate selection in humans from an evolutionary psychology perspective. It discusses that past research has largely focused on heterosexual relationships and chimpanzee behavior, ignoring factors like same-sex relationships, gender fluidity in females, environmental influences, and the role of male power in shaping mating patterns. The document argues for a more comprehensive, feminist approach to evolutionary psychology that examines diverse species like bonobos and centers females, in order to develop theories that more fully explain human mate selection behaviors.
This document discusses theories and risk factors related to intimate partner violence (IPV). It summarizes that IPV is a problem among teens and young adults, and can stem from issues of power, control, and masculinity threats. Key risk factors include witnessing domestic violence as a child, experiencing relationship insecurity, hostility towards women, and psychological problems like anger and substance abuse. The document also evaluates programs like the Duluth Model and Men of Strength Club that aim to reduce IPV by addressing attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors.
Psychological explanations of gender development: Cognitive development theory, inc. Kohlberg and Gender schema theory.
Biological influences on gender, including hormones, evolutionary, and biosocial approach to gender dysphoria
Social influences on gender, including parents, peers, and cultural influences on gender role
The document discusses the biosocial approach to gender development, which views both biological and social factors as important in determining gender identity and behavior. Specifically:
- Gender is determined by an interaction between innate biological factors (such as sex) and environmental/social influences (like differential treatment based on sex).
- Perceptions of a child's biological sex influence how they are treated and socialized by parents and others, meaning gender is partly socially constructed.
- Studies demonstrate that adults respond differently to infants based on perceptions of their biological sex, and this influences the child's environment.
Women commit less crime than men, but the gap is closing. Women tend to commit different types of crimes like shoplifting, receiving stolen goods, and prostitution, while men more commonly commit violent crimes, sex crimes, and burglary. Statistics show men are far more likely to be convicted of crimes and to be repeat offenders. However, some argue female crimes may be less likely to be reported or prosecuted compared to male crimes. Sociological explanations for differences in male and female criminality include socialization into different gender roles, the effects of patriarchal control over women, and theories that women's crime rates may increase as patriarchal control diminishes.
This document discusses gender patterns in crime based on official statistics and sociological theories. The key points are:
- Official statistics show males are far more likely to be convicted of crimes than females. However, some argue these statistics underestimate female offending.
- There are three main questions raised: do women really commit fewer crimes; how do we explain female criminality; and why do males commit more crimes?
- Theories to explain gender differences in crime include functionalist sex role theory, patriarchal control theory, and the liberation thesis. Masculinity is also discussed as a factor in male criminality.
1. There are three key sociological explanations for differences in female criminality: functionalist sex role theory, control theory, and the changing women's role or 'liberation thesis'.
2. Functionalist sex role theory argues that women are socialized differently than men and taught to be nurturing rather than aggressive, which makes criminal behavior less likely. Control theory suggests that tighter social controls on women through patriarchal structures reduce opportunities for crime.
3. The changing women's role thesis proposes that as women take on more 'male' roles in society and experience greater liberation, female crime rates have risen as social controls have weakened. However, critics argue that most female criminals are still working class women who are least
This document discusses heterosexual society's negative views of bisexuality. It identifies three primary reasons for discrimination against bisexuals: seeing them as promiscuous, feeling threatened by open sexuality, and assuming sexuality is dichotomous rather than a continuum. Negative attitudes were exacerbated by the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s and 90s. Men tend to be more biphobic than women as a way to affirm their masculinity by rejecting what is seen as unmanly. While some bisexual activity arises from desire, others engage in it due to comfort, necessity, or opportunity without intimacy. Overall, resentment toward bisexuals stems from cultural influences, beliefs, and ignorance of stereotypes.
This document discusses gender differences in aggressive behavior. It first establishes that statistics show men are more likely than women to commit violent crimes. It then explores some possible explanations for this difference, including social learning theory, deindividuation, institutionalization, and biological factors like levels of testosterone. The author argues that both environmental and biological factors likely contribute to gender differences in aggression.
The Investment Model proposes that commitment to a relationship is predicted by satisfaction, quality of alternatives, and investment. Satisfaction is determined by rewards minus costs. Investment includes resources like shared friends, property, and emotional attachment that would be lost if the relationship ended. Research found students more committed when satisfaction and investments were higher. The model was also applied to abusive relationships, finding highest commitment when investment was high but alternatives were low. However, the model is reductionist in assuming people are purely rational and does not account for differences in expected investments by gender or culture.
This document discusses theories around gender differences in crime and deviance. It notes that official crime statistics show most recorded crimes are committed by men. Various explanations for this are discussed, including biological theories, socialization/sex role theories, social control theories, and lack of opportunities. More recently, postmodern theories have looked at concepts like transgression. Theories have also examined how masculinity relates to crime, with some men feeling pressure to demonstrate aggression, control, and oppositional behavior to affirm their masculinity.
Sex-role theory and social control theory are two major approaches to explaining gender differences in criminal behavior. According to sex-role theory, boys and girls are socialized differently from a young age, with boys encouraged to take risks and be tough/aggressive, making them more likely to commit crimes. Females face closer social control from a young age, making them less likely to deviate from social norms. Feminist theorists criticize these approaches for failing to consider gender power differences and propose alternative theories like transgression theory, which examines activities that harm women and how gender roles are socially constructed to limit women's opportunities and freedom.
During a UN-sponsored seminar on sexual violence against men and boys in conflict Prof. Lara Stemple of UCLA discussed some of the research gaps that exist in the are of male-directed sexual violence.
Is the Criminal Justice System biased towards or against women?mattyp99
The document discusses evidence for and against the "chivalry thesis" which asserts that women are treated more leniently than men by the criminal justice system. Evidence for it includes self-report studies showing smaller differences in admitted crimes between men and women than official statistics. Evidence against includes arguments that the criminal justice system is biased against women, for example by scrutinizing female victims of crimes like rape more than male perpetrators. Overall, the document suggests the criminal justice system may treat men and women differently based on societal gender norms and expectations.
The document discusses rape culture in the U.S. It argues that preferential treatment given to men, especially white men resembling hegemonic masculinity, leads to a sense of entitlement that is a major factor in rape culture. Media like music videos teach that objectifying women is acceptable and that women exist only to serve men. Sports culture, exemplified by hockey, promotes misogynistic views where sexual aggression towards women is routine. Religions are also androcentric, viewing women as inferior and meant to obey men, contributing to the belief that women's bodies naturally belong to men. Changing this socialization will require eliminating the gender role hierarchy and paradigm of masculinity as domination.
This document discusses definitions related to gender identity, gender expression, sex, and sexual orientation. It notes that gender identity refers to one's internal sense of gender, which may differ from their sex assigned at birth. Sexual orientation refers to romantic or sexual attraction toward other people and exists on a spectrum. The document emphasizes that major medical and mental health professional organizations do not consider homosexuality a mental disorder and that efforts to change sexual orientation through conversion or reparative therapy have been found ineffective and potentially harmful.
1) Males commit significantly more crimes than females according to official crime statistics. Males are more likely to reoffend, have longer criminal careers, and commit more serious offenses.
2) The chivalry theory proposes that the criminal justice system treats females more leniently due to protective attitudes towards women, but some studies have found no evidence of leniency in sentencing.
3) Explanations for gender differences in crime include sex role theory, which links it to traditional gender roles, and patriarchal control theory, which argues that patriarchal control over women reduces their opportunities and freedom to offend.
Gender and crime revision crime and deviance A2- Lay out for an essaymillieprice1
The document discusses several sociological theories about gender differences in criminal behavior. It notes that early theorists like Adler and Heidenschins argued that women had less opportunity to commit crimes because they were typically confined to the home. However, as women have taken on more roles outside the home, there are now new opportunities for female criminal behavior. It also discusses gender role theory and how societies encourage more risk-taking and aggressive behaviors in boys that may expose them to criminal acts. Theories about masculinity and how crime allows males to demonstrate masculinity are also covered. Different views are presented on whether female offenders are treated more leniently or harshly by the criminal justice system compared to men.
The document discusses several topics related to discrimination and marginalized groups:
1) It describes how school discipline policies disproportionately affect students of color and can funnel them into the criminal justice system through the school-to-prison pipeline.
2) It discusses how disability diagnoses are sometimes used to label and track students of color, exacerbating racial disparities.
3) It outlines the fear and stress experienced by immigrant families under recent immigration policies, which negatively impacts their health, well-being, and daily lives.
This document summarizes current research on mate selection in humans from an evolutionary psychology perspective. It discusses that past research has largely focused on heterosexual relationships and chimpanzee behavior, ignoring factors like same-sex relationships, gender fluidity in females, environmental influences, and the role of male power in shaping mating patterns. The document argues for a more comprehensive, feminist approach to evolutionary psychology that examines diverse species like bonobos and centers females, in order to develop theories that more fully explain human mate selection behaviors.
This document discusses theories and risk factors related to intimate partner violence (IPV). It summarizes that IPV is a problem among teens and young adults, and can stem from issues of power, control, and masculinity threats. Key risk factors include witnessing domestic violence as a child, experiencing relationship insecurity, hostility towards women, and psychological problems like anger and substance abuse. The document also evaluates programs like the Duluth Model and Men of Strength Club that aim to reduce IPV by addressing attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors.
Gender Differences in Intimate Partner Violence OutcomesJe.docxhanneloremccaffery
The document summarizes a literature review on gender differences in outcomes of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization. The review finds that while men and women both experience negative physical and mental health effects from IPV, the literature largely shows that women suffer disproportionately and to a greater degree. Specifically, studies have found that women generally experience more injuries, poorer physical health, higher rates of depression/anxiety, greater posttraumatic stress, and larger decreases in relationship satisfaction as a result of IPV compared to men. The review proposes that these gender differences in outcomes may be due to cultural and social factors that typically give men higher status and power over women.
Psychology, Science, and Pseudoscience: Class #15 (Tend-and-Befriend)Brian Hughes
In short: Continuing the case-study on 'Biological Reductionism and Gender', we look at the claims and criticisms associated with the 'tend-and-befriend' theory of stress.
This document discusses the evolution of human behavior and the sociobiology controversy. It summarizes that E.O. Wilson published a book in 1975 arguing that human social behavior had evolutionary origins, which sparked criticism from those who saw human behavior as a blank slate shaped entirely by culture. However, tests of adoption patterns and mate preferences provide support for sociobiological hypotheses over the idea of purely arbitrary culture. For example, studies found that adopted children in many cultures were often related to their adopters, and that cues males and females find attractive in mates, like youth and resources, are linked to reproductive success.
This document discusses research on the relationship between childhood trauma and male homosexuality. It outlines several null hypotheses that childhood emotional trauma, childhood sexual abuse, childhood psychological abuse, childhood physical abuse, and other childhood traumas have no relationship to male homosexuality. The document then reviews studies finding correlations between childhood sexual abuse and male homosexuality, and weaknesses of studies arguing homosexuality is biologically determined. It describes potential negative outcomes of childhood sexual abuse on children. Finally, it proposes the study aims to explore these childhood trauma factors and hopes results can help understand development and improve help for men trapped in unwanted behaviors.
1) Aggression is defined as behavior intended to harm another living being who wants to avoid harm. Biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors all contribute to aggression.
2) Media violence exposure, through television, movies, video games and other media, increases the likelihood of aggressive behavior in both the short and long term according to research.
3) Bullying is a pattern of repeated aggression against a target with less power. It is motivated by a desire for power and status. Reducing bullying requires recognizing it as a problem and protecting victims.
Bullying in childhood can have long lasting negative effects. Victims are more likely to experience mental health issues like depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem that may persist into adulthood. Longitudinal studies show childhood victims are at higher risk as adults for disorders like depression, anxiety, antisocial personality disorder, and suicide attempts. Victims also tend to have poorer social relationships, economic difficulties, and lower quality of life in mid-life compared to non-victims. The effects of bullying can last decades and negatively impact both psychological and physical health.
Revision lesson on AQA's IDA concepts for A2joapsychology
Here is an example of a reasonable response using IDA for this question:
Attachment theory proposes that early relationships with caregivers shape expectations in future romantic relationships. This theory is relevant to the debate around the nature versus nurture influences on relationships. Attachment theory suggests that relationship behaviors are influenced by both genetic and environmental factors (nature and nurture).
Early experiences with caregivers lead to the development of internal working models which influence how people behave in close relationships. Secure attachment stemming from warm, responsive caregiving is linked to healthy relationships whereas insecure attachments are linked to relationship difficulties. However, the theory has been criticized for being culturally insensitive as the concepts of secure base and attachment were developed based on Western ideas of independence. Research also finds cultural differences
RESPOND TO Several studies have explored the issues that.docxwrite4
This document discusses several issues faced by people with disabilities in relation to their sexuality. First, their sexual expression is often seen as inappropriate due to beliefs about passing on cognitive limitations or an inability to handle sexuality responsibly as adults. Second, they are frequently treated like children without consideration for their desires. Finally, people with disabilities often struggle to develop a sexual identity and find partners or learn about sexuality safely due to low knowledge and barriers like abuse, making responsible sexual behavior difficult.
The document discusses several explanations for media influences on pro-social and anti-social behaviour. It summarizes research on how viewing pro-social models on TV can increase helpful behaviours in children. It also discusses how viewing violent media can lead to increased aggression through excitation transfer and emotional desensitization. The document also reviews theories of persuasion, celebrity attraction, and extreme fan behaviour.
Running head: CHILDHOOD BULLYING 1
CHILDHOOD BULLYING 5
Childhood Bullying
GEN 499 General Education
Introduction
As crime rates increase and violence against humanity continues to permeate society, it seems nearly impossible to escape both the short-term and long-lasting effects of aggressive and violent behavior. With more money being spent on the building of prisons and less on the education, it is not surprising that violence and aggression are not only prevalent problems in adulthood but also significant problems in childhood (Cheryl, 2004). For instance, when looking at many school systems throughout the world, violence and aggression between students has commonly been regard as one of the most concerning problems for teachers for teachers, administrators and policy makers.
Thesis
The aforesaid research is aimed at evaluating how bullying behaviors are influenced by a variety of environmental and genetic factors. However, so as to understand the relations between bullying and various factors, it is important to also review literature examining relationship between aggression and these factors since bullying is a subtype of assault and there is much already known regarding aggression. Therefore, the research is meant to bring out the relationships between aggression and a variety of factors followed by relations between intimidation and these factors.
One particular type of aggression that has received increased attention in school systems over the past few decided is bullying. Frequently identified as a subtype of proactive aggression, bullying has often been defined as repeated, negative actions to deliberately harm individuals who are weaker than oneself. When comparing the defining components of bullying to aggression, reviews of the bullying literature suggest that there are five characteristics that differentiate bullying behaviors from aggressive behaviors. As per Green (2000), bullying occurs when the bully intends to inflict harm upon his victim, when aggression occurs repeatedly, when the victim does not provoke bullying behavior, when the attack occurs within a familiar social group, and when the bully is more powerful than the victim. Thus, bullying behaviors are different than aggressive behaviors in that bullying specifically focuses on roles of power, frequency and duration of aggression, and the setting in which the aggressive acts occur.
Many individuals encounter acts of violence and aggression throughout their daily lives. From the high number of violent television shows on national networks to the increased rates of school violence and school shootings, it is not surprisingly that even though we appear to be growing and evolving in our knowledge and human behavi ...
The document discusses several potential mechanisms by which media violence could lead to real-life aggression. It describes research supporting the ideas that repeated exposure to violent media can cause desensitization, weaken social constraints through disinhibition, and prime aggressive cognitive scripts. Studies show people feel less arousal after violent media, act more aggressively when justified, and are more likely to perceive situations as aggressive. However, the effects of media are complex with many variables.
The document discusses the psychological phenomenon of "splitting" where a person is unable to integrate their perception of themselves and others as both good and bad. It summarizes research finding that splitting can result from insecure attachment as a child due to neglect, abuse, or trauma. This causes extreme shame and prevents normal ego development, leading the individual to use splitting as a defense mechanism to avoid reality and create an idealized sense of self. The document reviews several studies that found emotional abuse in particular predicted higher rates of depersonalization, a symptom of splitting.
Bullying is defined as aggressive behavior that is intentional, repeated over time, and involves an imbalance of power. Bullies bully for several reasons related to their early childhood experiences and family relationships. Children who experience insecure attachments as infants or who have dysfunctional family lives with abusive parents are more likely to bully others. Low socioeconomic status and having siblings who bully at home can also contribute to a child becoming a bully. Witnessing the success of sibling bullying sets an example, and stress from financial problems can reduce parental support and warmth.
This document summarizes research on the effects of childhood sexual abuse on mental health and behaviors in adulthood. It discusses how childhood sexual abuse can lead to mental health issues like depression, anxiety, and PTSD. It also explores how abuse survivors are more likely to engage in risky behaviors like substance abuse, unprotected sex, and prostitution. The document examines several studies that found links between childhood abuse and poor physical health and obesity in adulthood. It suggests that early intervention and counseling for abuse survivors could help alleviate medical issues stemming from their trauma.
AQA Psychology A Level Revision Cards - Aggression Topicaesop
revision cards for aqa psych paper 3 aggression topic. please excuse spelling or grammar mistakes! made entirely by me using the standard year 2 textbook, for reference i achieved an a* :)
This paper examines theories of intimate partner violence and how same-sex battering threatens these theories. It analyzes the biological theory of male aggression, the feminist theory of patriarchal gender roles, and the social-psychological model. Studies on aggression support male biological predisposition to violence. Gender role studies found domestic violence with female victims seen as most serious, consistent with feminist views. However, rates of violence are similar between same-sex and heterosexual couples, challenging feminist and biological theories. The social-psychological model best explains same-sex battering by integrating psychological and social factors beyond gender alone. More research is needed on same-sex intimate partner violence.
A Conceptual Analysis of Correlates of Domestic Violence and Adolescent Risky...AJHSSR Journal
ABSTRACT: The study explores domestic violence and how it influences adolescent risky behavior.
Domestic violence is a devastating social problem resulting in significant and enduring effects on children,
threatening both their health and emotional well-being. The study aimed at examining the relationships between
domestic Violence and Psychological Empowerment, Domestic Violence and Self-esteem, psychological
Empowerment and Self-Regulation, Self Esteem and Psychological empowerment, Self-Esteem and Selfregulation, Self-Regulation and Adolescent Risky Behavior and identify the stronger predictor of self-regulation
between psychological empowerment and Self-esteem. Adolescent respondents who experienced domestic
violence were purposely selected and guided by teachers and administrators who had provided support to these
children.The questionnaire had six sections namely; personal information, the Child Exposure to Domestic
Violence Scale, the Psychological empowerment scale, the Rosenberg Self-esteem Inventory, and the Brief
Self-Control Scale. Data analysis employed Pearson's product-moment correlation (r) to test hypotheses 1,
2,3,4,5, and 6. Regression analysis was used for hypothesis 7.The results show a significant relationship
between domestic Violence and Psychological Empowerment, Domestic Violence and Self-esteem,
psychological Empowerment and Self-Regulation, Self Esteem and Psychological empowerment, Self-Esteem
and Self-regulation, Self-Regulation, and Adolescent Risky Behavior. The study documents that Psychological
empowerment is a stronger predictor of self-regulation than Self-esteem.
KEYWORDS:Domestic violence, psychological empowerment, self-regulation, and Adolescent risky behavior
1) A study of 912 female college students found that those with histories of child abuse experienced greater difficulties regulating emotions and higher rates of posttraumatic stress compared to those without abuse histories.
2) The study suggested that interventions aimed at improving emotion regulation strategies could help reduce posttraumatic stress in abuse survivors.
3) Another finding was that 25-50% of children experience some form of abuse, with 1 in 3 girls experiencing sexual abuse and 1 in 5-7 boys experiencing sexual abuse by age 18.
Similar to Evolutionary explanation of Aggression (20)
Why Psychological Safety Matters for Software Teams - ACE 2024 - Ben Linders.pdfBen Linders
Psychological safety in teams is important; team members must feel safe and able to communicate and collaborate effectively to deliver value. It’s also necessary to build long-lasting teams since things will happen and relationships will be strained.
But, how safe is a team? How can we determine if there are any factors that make the team unsafe or have an impact on the team’s culture?
In this mini-workshop, we’ll play games for psychological safety and team culture utilizing a deck of coaching cards, The Psychological Safety Cards. We will learn how to use gamification to gain a better understanding of what’s going on in teams. Individuals share what they have learned from working in teams, what has impacted the team’s safety and culture, and what has led to positive change.
Different game formats will be played in groups in parallel. Examples are an ice-breaker to get people talking about psychological safety, a constellation where people take positions about aspects of psychological safety in their team or organization, and collaborative card games where people work together to create an environment that fosters psychological safety.
The importance of sustainable and efficient computational practices in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning has become increasingly critical. This webinar focuses on the intersection of sustainability and AI, highlighting the significance of energy-efficient deep learning, innovative randomization techniques in neural networks, the potential of reservoir computing, and the cutting-edge realm of neuromorphic computing. This webinar aims to connect theoretical knowledge with practical applications and provide insights into how these innovative approaches can lead to more robust, efficient, and environmentally conscious AI systems.
Webinar Speaker: Prof. Claudio Gallicchio, Assistant Professor, University of Pisa
Claudio Gallicchio is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Computer Science of the University of Pisa, Italy. His research involves merging concepts from Deep Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Randomized Neural Systems, and he has co-authored over 100 scientific publications on the subject. He is the founder of the IEEE CIS Task Force on Reservoir Computing, and the co-founder and chair of the IEEE Task Force on Randomization-based Neural Networks and Learning Systems. He is an associate editor of IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (TNNLS).
This presentation by Nathaniel Lane, Associate Professor in Economics at Oxford University, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Professor Giuseppe Colangelo, Jean Monnet Professor of European Innovation Policy, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Carrer goals.pptx and their importance in real lifeartemacademy2
Career goals serve as a roadmap for individuals, guiding them toward achieving long-term professional aspirations and personal fulfillment. Establishing clear career goals enables professionals to focus their efforts on developing specific skills, gaining relevant experience, and making strategic decisions that align with their desired career trajectory. By setting both short-term and long-term objectives, individuals can systematically track their progress, make necessary adjustments, and stay motivated. Short-term goals often include acquiring new qualifications, mastering particular competencies, or securing a specific role, while long-term goals might encompass reaching executive positions, becoming industry experts, or launching entrepreneurial ventures.
Moreover, having well-defined career goals fosters a sense of purpose and direction, enhancing job satisfaction and overall productivity. It encourages continuous learning and adaptation, as professionals remain attuned to industry trends and evolving job market demands. Career goals also facilitate better time management and resource allocation, as individuals prioritize tasks and opportunities that advance their professional growth. In addition, articulating career goals can aid in networking and mentorship, as it allows individuals to communicate their aspirations clearly to potential mentors, colleagues, and employers, thereby opening doors to valuable guidance and support. Ultimately, career goals are integral to personal and professional development, driving individuals toward sustained success and fulfillment in their chosen fields.
This presentation by Tim Capel, Director of the UK Information Commissioner’s Office Legal Service, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Yong Lim, Professor of Economic Law at Seoul National University School of Law, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
XP 2024 presentation: A New Look to Leadershipsamililja
Presentation slides from XP2024 conference, Bolzano IT. The slides describe a new view to leadership and combines it with anthro-complexity (aka cynefin).
This presentation by Katharine Kemp, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law & Justice at UNSW Sydney, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Juraj Čorba, Chair of OECD Working Party on Artificial Intelligence Governance (AIGO), was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
2. AO1
• P - Cuckoldry is when a man has to financially support a child that
may not be his. This risk may lead to sexual jealousy as financially
providing for this child would reduce the chance of him successfully
reproducing himself with his partner due to the time and effort he’d
invest into raising the child. As a result, the male partner may force
his partner to terminate the pregnancy by aggressive force to
reduce this risk.
• E - Wilson et al (1975) studied women who described their
husbands as jealous. He found that these women were more likely
to be a victim of violence and 72% of them needed medical
attention following male assault.
• E – Jealousy in a man arises when he feels insecure about his
chances of reproducing and as the research shows men may resort
to violence in order to diminish the probability of this threat coming
about.
• L – This suggests that aggression in men is an evolutionary response
that occurs in order to successfully pass on his genes. This reflects
ancestral and animal behaviour whereby males fight for their
chance to mate and appear more resourceful to other females.
3. A02
• There is inconsistent evidence from Shackleford et al (2000) who
found that in a sample of 13,670 uxorocides, younger women are
more at risk. This contradicts evolutionary logic that men should
regard women as ‘prized property’ because when the wife is
younger she is more reproductively valuable and killing her defies
evolutionary logic. This suggests that maybe it’s another factor that
results in sexual jealousy rather than evolutionary responses.
However…
• Duntley and Buss (2005) explained these findings in terms of the
facts that infidelity carries a double loss for a man (esp. when the
female is at a reproductive age) because he loses a partner and
another man gains his partner and increases his own fitness;
uxorocide prevents a competitor from gaining in the reproductive
stakes. This study supports the evolutionary explanation as it
suggests that ultimately, killing of a partner occurs when a man
wants to protect his chances of reproduction.
4. AO3
• The explanation is deterministic as it concludes that
jealousy will definitely lead to aggression towards the
female partner, it clearly ignores the human
characteristic of free-will. This will cause complications
for the legal system when finding people liable for
violence because the evolutionary explanation says we
are not ac countable for our behaviour therefore
should not be held responsible.
• It also does not take into consideration other factors
such as the cognitive thought processes that lead to
aggressive behaviour and it could be an accumulation
of multiple factors rather than solely jealousy.
5. AO1
• P - Mate retention is the act of guarding against mate
poaching and maintaining a partner’s interest. This includes
direct guarding and negative inducements. Direct guarding
is when the male restricts his partner’s sexual autonomy.
Coming home early from work, for example, to check on his
partner is an act of direct guarding. Negative Inducements
are used to prevent a partner from straying.
• E - Shackleford (2005) found men who used mate retention
are more aggressive.
• E - This suggests that mate retention is the main reason for
aggression towards a partner.
• L - Vigilance is an adaptation that has evolved specifically
to deal with the threat of paternal uncertainty and this
indicates that these strategies have occurred as a result of
evolution.
6. AO2
• There is supporting empirical evidence from Daly
and Wilson who claim that men have evolved
mate retention strategies to deter their mate
from leaving because without a mate their
chances of reproduction are reduced. So these
strategies enhance reproductive fitness (surviving
and passing on genes).
• A criticism of the evolutionary theory is that it is
post-hoc, there is never any direct evidence to
support that our behaviour occurs as a result of
evolution.
7. A03
• The explanation is reductionist as it doesn’t take into
account psychodynamic factors that may lead to over
protective behaviour (like checking up on partners)
which could be a result of previous control-related
experiences in an individual’s early childhood.
• Gender bias is also a criticism of this study as Archer
(2000) found equal rates of assault in men and women
and those women also engaged in mate retention. The
evolutionary explanation overstates the effect of
ancestral history on men but doesn’t explain it properly
in terms of women; generalizability is also an issue as a
result because it is limited to men mostly.