Competency is defined
as "the quality or state
of      being    legally
qualified or adequate.”
   norm-referenced : the measured competence
    is interpreted and judged in terms of the
    individual’s position relative to some known
    group.
   criterion-referenced evaluation: is
    interpreting and judging the measured
    competence in terms of a clearly defined and
    delimited domain.
   The two approaches have common and
    different characteristics. Both require a
    specification of the achievement domain to
    be mastered, a relevant and representative
    sample of tasks or test items. They use the
    same types of tasks and qualities of
    goodness (e.g. validity, reliability) for judging
    them.
    norm-referenced evaluation typically covers a large
    domain of requirements with a few tasks used to
    measure mastery, emphasises discrimination among
    individuals, favour stasks of average difficulty, omits
    very easy and very hard tasks, and requires a clearly
    defined group of persons for interpretations;

   criterion-referenced evaluation focuses on a
    delimited domain of requirements with a relatively
    large number of tasks used to measure
    mastery, emphasises what requirements the
    individual can or cannot perform, matches task
    difficulty of requirements, and demands a clearly
    defined and delimited achievement domain.
In U.S.A. teachers themselves recognize that
  most current evaluation systems do not offer
  meaningful feedback on their performance.
Administrators to use a binary rating sheet
  once a year, on which they check off whether
  a teacher is either “satisfactory” or
  “unsatisfactory” on a series of items.
Current evaluation systems do not allow to
 recognize or learn from top performers, to
 help all teachers by supporting their
 growth, or to respond forcefully when teacher
 performance falls well below acceptable
 levels.
One element stands out: the development and
  thorough     use    of    performance-linked
  “competencies” to measure, reward, and
  develop teacher performance.
Singapore has been able to demonstrate
  extraordinary student learning results.
In Singapore the majority of teachers favored
  an even stronger link between performance
  and pay than the plan provided.
It consists of one core competency, “Nurturing
  the Whole Child,” and four other major
  competency         clusters,     “Cultivating
  Knowledge,” “Winning Hearts and Minds,”
  “Working with Others,” and “Knowing Self and
  Others.
Singapore’s Education Ministry officials and
  school leaders use the competency model in
  conjunction with the achievement of
  performance goals at each stage of
  employment to:
 Hire and train aspiring teachers;
 Set annual competency achievement targets;
 Evaluate competency levels throughout the
  year;
 Match each teacher to a career path; and
 Determine annual bonuses.path; and
 Determine annual bonuses
   Attractive compensation. Teachers are relatively well
    paid, have performance bonus opportunities, and
    have excellent benefits.
   Multiple opportunities for career advancement. There
    are three education tracks, each with several levels of
    advancement.
   Ongoing professional support. Includes paid
    leave, scholarships for advanced study, online
    training opportunities, and opportunities to
    collaborate with colleagues.
   Chance to be part of a vitally important and revered
    profession. Throughout Singapore, there are
    recruiting posters inviting people to become teachers
    so they can “Mould the Future of the Nation.”
Continuously    improving     and      informing
 teaching so as to better educate all students.

In that way, a complete evaluation system
  includes not only measurable results, but also
  professional skills, such as curriculum
  planning, and of course the competencies
  that are critical for achieving results.

Evaluation competencies

  • 2.
    Competency is defined as"the quality or state of being legally qualified or adequate.”
  • 3.
    norm-referenced : the measured competence is interpreted and judged in terms of the individual’s position relative to some known group.  criterion-referenced evaluation: is interpreting and judging the measured competence in terms of a clearly defined and delimited domain.
  • 4.
    The two approaches have common and different characteristics. Both require a specification of the achievement domain to be mastered, a relevant and representative sample of tasks or test items. They use the same types of tasks and qualities of goodness (e.g. validity, reliability) for judging them.
  • 5.
    norm-referenced evaluation typically covers a large domain of requirements with a few tasks used to measure mastery, emphasises discrimination among individuals, favour stasks of average difficulty, omits very easy and very hard tasks, and requires a clearly defined group of persons for interpretations;  criterion-referenced evaluation focuses on a delimited domain of requirements with a relatively large number of tasks used to measure mastery, emphasises what requirements the individual can or cannot perform, matches task difficulty of requirements, and demands a clearly defined and delimited achievement domain.
  • 6.
    In U.S.A. teachersthemselves recognize that most current evaluation systems do not offer meaningful feedback on their performance. Administrators to use a binary rating sheet once a year, on which they check off whether a teacher is either “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory” on a series of items.
  • 7.
    Current evaluation systemsdo not allow to recognize or learn from top performers, to help all teachers by supporting their growth, or to respond forcefully when teacher performance falls well below acceptable levels.
  • 8.
    One element standsout: the development and thorough use of performance-linked “competencies” to measure, reward, and develop teacher performance. Singapore has been able to demonstrate extraordinary student learning results. In Singapore the majority of teachers favored an even stronger link between performance and pay than the plan provided.
  • 10.
    It consists ofone core competency, “Nurturing the Whole Child,” and four other major competency clusters, “Cultivating Knowledge,” “Winning Hearts and Minds,” “Working with Others,” and “Knowing Self and Others.
  • 11.
    Singapore’s Education Ministryofficials and school leaders use the competency model in conjunction with the achievement of performance goals at each stage of employment to:  Hire and train aspiring teachers;  Set annual competency achievement targets;  Evaluate competency levels throughout the year;  Match each teacher to a career path; and  Determine annual bonuses.path; and  Determine annual bonuses
  • 12.
    Attractive compensation. Teachers are relatively well paid, have performance bonus opportunities, and have excellent benefits.  Multiple opportunities for career advancement. There are three education tracks, each with several levels of advancement.  Ongoing professional support. Includes paid leave, scholarships for advanced study, online training opportunities, and opportunities to collaborate with colleagues.  Chance to be part of a vitally important and revered profession. Throughout Singapore, there are recruiting posters inviting people to become teachers so they can “Mould the Future of the Nation.”
  • 13.
    Continuously improving and informing teaching so as to better educate all students. In that way, a complete evaluation system includes not only measurable results, but also professional skills, such as curriculum planning, and of course the competencies that are critical for achieving results.