The document discusses several issues relating to journalism, politics, and ethics in reporting. It addresses the role of journalism in a democracy to inform the public, challenges in achieving balanced reporting, and the influence of political advertising and microtargeting. Some key points include: - Journalism aims to inform the public but balancing multiple viewpoints can be difficult, and not all opinions deserve equal coverage. - Political advertising is important for visibility but can be misleading or attack opponents unfairly. Online political ads allow for microtargeting. - Microtargeting through data profiling raises issues of transparency, consent, and leaving some groups out of political discussions. It can be difficult to fact-check targeted messages.

1. Ethics and balanced
(political) reporting

2. Journalism in Society
•Journalism helps people understand their
“imagined community”
•Modern community is complex and requires
translating
•Journalism as the “fourth estate”
•Communication comes with power (and
responsibility)

3. The Fourth Estate
• Traditionally in Europe, the other three estates were the nobility,
the clergy and the laity
• In the US sometimes thought of as the three branches of
government – Executive (President), Legislative (House and
Senate) and Courts
• Journalism deemed to have a “watchdog” role on the other
branches
• Some argue that it is often more lapdog than watchdog
• Why?

4. Ties between the estates
• Media rely on government sources for
much of their output
• PR must die!
• Media are now central to entire act of
governance. Governments spend vast
amounts on communications activity
• £100m on “Get ready for Brexit” ad
campaign – good responsible
governance, or PR to forward an
agenda?

5. Journalism’s dirty secret
• Much of current media content originates from public
communications from government and business
• But this form of plagiarism is rarely acknowledged (Lewis et al.)
• Sometimes called “information subsidies” (Gandy, 1982)
• Brandenburg (2002) recorded the extent to which UK political
parties produce these subsidies
• Why do you think they are called “information subsidies?”

6. Agenda-setting
• A lot of work has been done examining who sets the agenda in
political campaigns. Is it the press, the public, the parties?
• It depends
• Brandenburg found strong evidence that party press releases had a
strong impact on the agenda
• What do we mean by setting the agenda?
• It is the things that people say are important to them

7. What is the most
important issue for
you in this election?

9. Hmm, I’m kind of
worried about
immigration

11. Hmm, and not a big
fan of the EU – think
they’re to blame for
the immigrants

12. Here’s some of my research
• It’s the EU immigrants stupid! – UKIP’s core-issue and populist
rhetoric on the road to Brexit

13. BACKGROUND
• Parliamentary democracy with First-Past-The-Post voting for local Members of
Parliament (650 constituencies)
• 2010 General Election –Conservative 32%, Labour 35% , Liberal Democrats 22%,
UKIP 3% (Con/LibDem coalition)
• 2015 General Election – Conservative 37%, Labour 30%, Liberal Democrats 8%,
UKIP 13% (Con majority)
• 2016 Brexit – 52%:48% voted to leave the EU
• 2017 General Election – Conservative 42%, Labour 40%, Liberal Democrats 7%,
UKIP 2% (Con/DUP coalition)
• 2018 English council elections – UKIP lost 123 councillors in 150 local elections,
winning just three seats. Like the “Black Death”

14. Brexit
• Conservative Party – divided but most of the front bench including
Prime Minister Cameron, Chancellor Osborne, Home Secretary
campaigned to Remain
• Labour Party – fairly united in campaigning to Remain
• Liberal Democrats – Remain
• Scottish National Party – Remain
• Plaid Cymru – Remain
• UKIP – Leave
• 2.8 million non-voters turned out for the referendum and voted
overwhelmingly to Leave
• 30 million voted in the 2015 General Election, 26 million for
parties wholly or mainly supporting Remain
• Yet 17.4 million voted to Leave and 16.1m to Remain

15. QUESTION
• Why did the public not respond to the relatively homogenous
message from the political establishment?
• What was being said by UKIP and what was being said about UKIP?

16. UKIP and populism
• UKIP are complete populists (Stanyer et al.
2017) –
• Appeals to “ordinary people/folk”, “working
man/people/families”, “hard working”, “the
public”
• Anti-Elite appeal – “the rich”,
“establishment/Westminster/legacy parties”,
“the elite”, “political class”
• Othering (in-group/out-group) – “British
people/national/families”,
“migrant/migration”, “our people/nation”.

17. Methods
• UKIP News Releases 2009-2016 collected (n=2,390)
• Twelve UK newspapers - story KWIC extracts surrounding “UKIP”
(n= 43,000)
• Iterative coding scheme developed to code for n-grams associated
with populist rhetoric, the EU, and six common areas of political
policy (e.g. health, education, economy)

18. Findings – press releases (EU)

19. Press releases and populism

20. Newspaper reporting

21. Conclusion
• UKIP talked about the EU. A lot.
• UKIP talked about immigration. A lot.
• UKIP connected immigration with the EU. A lot.
• Newspapers, particularly the Express reported this. A lot.
• Immigration and the EU became more important to people
• It went higher up their agenda

22. And another one of mine
• Debatable sphere: major party hegemony, minor party
marginalization in the UK Leaders’ debate

23. General Election debates 2015
• Televised debates are new to the UK electoral scene
• The first one only happened in 2010
• This time, seven leaders were on the stage
• It was supposed to be an equal opportunity for all seven to
present their views and plans to the electorate
• It was supposed to look like this:

24. A normative debate

25. DEBATE WITHIN DEBATE

26. The actual debate

27. But it can depend on the question

28. Why does this happen?
•And what are the implications?

29. Journalism and Democracy
Democracy
assumes (or hopes
for) an informed
electorate
What role do
journalists play in
this?

30. Journalism and Democracy
• Media role (in part) is to inform the public
• “Uses and gratification” model – Katz
• One of the uses we have for media is to tell us about what is
happening out there
• In political terms, it is who is doing what and why
• This should help answer the question, “who should I vote for?”
• Quick aside…

31. REGISTER TO
VOTE!
• AND VOTE!
• EVERY TIME YOU
HAVE AN
OPPORTUNITY
• IT IS IMPORTANT
• IT DOES MATTER

32. Balanced political reporting
What is
balance?
How can
balance be
achieved?

33. Media models
• Inter-media balance (UK for print, US for
broadcast – Fox and MSNBC)
• Intra-medium balance (multi-author blog sites,
comment pages)
•Intra-story balance (US for print,
US/UK for broadcast – ABC, NBC, BBC)

34. Was it the
“Sun wot
won it?”

35. What is balanced?
• A balanced political story tells _____ sides of the
story

36. Both sides of the story
• But what about if there are more than two sides?
• What if there is another alternative the public should know about?
• “Strategic ritual of objectivity” – argued that it has often come to
mean “she said, he said”. No space for a third view.

37. Green New Deal
What is this?
Who
developed it?
How would
you report
on it?

38. Reporting on third/minor parties
• 2016 email from Jill Stein (Green Party)
campaign: “our campaign received 3 seconds of
coverage on corporate media for every 1,700
minutes for Trump and every 1,000+ minutes for
Clinton.”
• Is that fair?
• What would be a reasonable amount?
• Why should reporters waste time on a party
which only got 1% of votes?

39. Climate Change / Global Warming / Climate
Crisis / Global Heating
• 98%+ of climate scientists agree on it
• Around 70% of US population believe it is happening
• (but only 55% of Republicans and 26% of Conservative Republicans)
• How much coverage should you, as a journalist, give to climate
change denial?
• Should a story about climate change get the opinion of “flat-
earthers?”
• How do you decide?

40. False equivalence

41. And the “truth” can also change over time
• 1950 – Smoking is good for you!
• 1970 – Well it’s not bad for you
• 1980 – Well it’s probably not great
• 1985 – Okay, so it’s bad, but just for you
• 2000 – Um, and everyone around you
• 2015 – Vaping though is fine. Yipee!
• 2017 – Well actually, not so much…
• 2018 – Juuling though, definitely fine
• 2019 – Well…

42. Summary
• Journalists have potential power to change public
opinion on an issue
• Journalists have potential power to change the
result of an election
• Balance can be aimed for (achieved) in different
ways
• Good journalists consider alternative viewpoints
• Not all opinions should be treated equally
• How would you use this power?

43. Media, Politics, and Ethics
What are the pros of political
advertising?
• Allows candidates to be known, as
well as their platforms
• Allows for direct contact with the
voter
• It is a facet of open democratic
exchange

44. Media, Politics, and Ethics: A
Primer
What are the cons of political
advertising?
• The cost: $2.6 billion in 2012,$6.8
billion in 2016
• Can you argue that that figure
alone is unethical?
• The content: What about when ads
are created to mislead people?

45. John Kerry attack ad
• Swift Boat Veterans for
Truth
• Group of veterans who
attacked Kerry’s war record
and his testimony about
Vietnam
• Veterans who had little or
no experience of Kerry’s
service in Vietnam
• Veterans who served
supported Kerry’s version of
events
• “Swiftboating” now used as
a term for unfair attack ad

46. And more recently…

47. What are the ethical issues here?

48. And online
Political ads fail at fulfilling their
duty, for the most part
There is also limited recourse for the
public
The inevitable outgrowth of all these
political ads on TV is….political ads on
the Internet

49. Online v TV
One third of campaign spending was
on online ads in 2016
What are the pros of online ads v
television ads?
Better targeting

50. Online politics
What is microtargeting?
• Take for example, DSPolitical
• They have aggregated 600 million
cookies- what do you think they do
with them?
• They tag and track online
movements, then translate them
into potential candidate support

51. More of my stuff
What is microtargeting?
• This way they can create and target
ads specifically for you
• Use the same techniques as
companies like Amazon – predict
your likelihood of voting and for
whom

52. What is microtargeting?
• This way they can create and target
ads specifically for you
• They can place the ads strategically
or repeatedly
Microtargeting

53. What is microtargeting?
• This way they can create and target
ads specifically for you
• They can place the ads strategically
or repeatedly
What are the potential problems
here?
Microtargeting

54. Microtargeting
Cons of microtargeting:
• 86% of people said they don’t want
tailored ads
• People don’t want to be stereotyped- and
they don’t want to feel pandered to for
the sake of a vote
• Some allege that it is a form of redlining-
in other words, some people are
essentially made more valuable than
others
• They can also target in a way to
decrease people’s likelihood of voting

55. Microtargeting
Cons of microtargeting:
• Some people are left out
completely, which is antithetical to
democracy

56. Cons of microtargeting:
• Some people are left out
completely, which is antithetical to
democracy
• Like traditional ads, its difficult to
fact- or quality-check
Microtargeting

57. Cons of microtargeting:
• Some people are left out
completely, which is antithetical to
democracy
• Like traditional ads, its difficult to
fact- or quality-check
• There is no opt-out, at this stage
Microtargeting

58. Microtargeting
Cons of microtargeting:
• Some people are left out
completely, which is antithetical to
democracy
• Like traditional ads, its difficult to
fact- or quality-check
• There is no opt-out, at this stage
• It feels, like a lot of things online,
like stalking

59. Microtargeting
Pros of microtargeting?
• We have had tailored speeches and
letters, and this is a natural
extension
• People might actually become
interested in politics if its about a
certain issue you are concerned with
• Its natural for campaigns to take
advantage of the technology- if
Amazon can do it, they should too

60. What about the trolls n bots?
Then there are the fake accounts, the
trolls, the bots
My study intended to examine
microtargeting ended up being a study
of the level of ads directed at US
citizens which came from bots and troll
armies

61. Mueller Report
Page 27, Footnote 71:
Josephine Lukito & Chris Wells, “Most Major
Outlets Have Used Russian Tweets as Sources for
Partisan Opinion: Study,” Columbia Journalism
Review (Mar. 8, 2018).
Found evidence of lots of tweets written by IRA
employees ending up in most of the 100 media
outlets examined.
What has gone wrong here?
What are the problems?

62. Internet Research Agency
Then there are the bots and actors
deliberately using social media
We have never seen wide-scale
interference or fake news like this,
ever
To what extent are the companies
responsible?

63. Luktio - Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation
Campaign: Internet Research Agency Activity on
Three U.S. Social Media Platforms, 2015 to 2017
• Found evidence of extensive IRA activity on
Reddit, Facebook and Twitter
• Reddit activity often preceded Twitter – used
Reddit to test out different messages
• BlackToLive – IRA account pretending to be
BLM. Had accounts on Twitter, Reddit,
Tumblr, Medium, YouTube, Gmail and a
website

64. Social media, politics and ethics
The Internet and social media has the
power to transform politics
• By allowing for an increase in
information (like the printing press)
• Lowering costs of coordination (Shirky)
• By creating a more open public sphere
(Habermas)
• But – it can also be weaponized and
used to subvert this promise