Estermann montreal symposium_2016_open_glam_benchmark_survey_20160509Beat Estermann
OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey - Measuring the Advancement of Open Data / Open Content in the Heritage Sector. Presentation at the International Symposium on the Measurement of Digital Cultural Products, Montreal, May 2016.
Jisc Support for Asset Sharing - Kit-Catalogue National User Group November 2014Martin Hamilton
My slides introducing Jisc's support for asset sharing, at the 2014 Kit-Catalogue national user group. I talk about the rationale for Jisc becoming involved in supporting equipment sharing and the Jisc Kit-Catalogue pilot, and present some feedback from user group delegates about their experiences of equipment sharing. For more information about this initiative, please see http://www.jisc.ac.uk/research/projects/equipment-sharing
Estermann montreal symposium_2016_open_glam_benchmark_survey_20160509Beat Estermann
OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey - Measuring the Advancement of Open Data / Open Content in the Heritage Sector. Presentation at the International Symposium on the Measurement of Digital Cultural Products, Montreal, May 2016.
Jisc Support for Asset Sharing - Kit-Catalogue National User Group November 2014Martin Hamilton
My slides introducing Jisc's support for asset sharing, at the 2014 Kit-Catalogue national user group. I talk about the rationale for Jisc becoming involved in supporting equipment sharing and the Jisc Kit-Catalogue pilot, and present some feedback from user group delegates about their experiences of equipment sharing. For more information about this initiative, please see http://www.jisc.ac.uk/research/projects/equipment-sharing
Are we failing users? Can open approaches meet their needs? - Maura MarxJisc
Are we failing users? Can open approaches meet their needs?
Maura's plenary presentation at the Jisc/British Library Discovery Summit 2013
February 2013, London
Presentation on LinkedUp Project given at P2PU community meeting, 17th October 2013. The video is at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gh3PQYzTdJ4&feature=share
The Open Education Working Group: Bringing people and projects togetherMarieke Guy
Presentation given at Open Data in Education Seminar, St Petersburg, 10th March 2014: http://linkededucation.org/events/open-data-in-education-seminar-st-petersburg
Leveraging change through digital capability - James Clay, Chris Roberts, Tim...Jisc
Led by James Clay, project manager, Jisc.
With contributions from:
Chris Roberts, deputy learning resources manager/librarian, Lambeth College
Tim Linsey, director of Centre for Higher Education Research and Practice, Kingston University
Connect more in London, 29 June 2016
From Jisc's student experience experts group meeting in Birmingham on 21 April 2016.
https://www.jisc.ac.uk/events/student-experience-experts-group-meeting-20-apr-2016
How to equip researchers in managing data - JIsc Digital Festival 2015Jisc
This demonstration will encourage information professionals, librarians and research support staff to become familiar with online training materials and methods to support researchers in achieving research data management best practice.
Digital scholarship and identifiers - Geoffrey Bilder, CrossReff
Share update – Elliott Shore, Association of Research Libraries
Jisc Monitor update – Neil Jacobs, Jisc
Infrastructure and services to track research activity – Daniel Hook, Digital Science
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
B2: Open Up: Open Data in the Public SectorMarieke Guy
Parallel session [B2: Open Up: Open Data in the Public Sector] run at the Institutional Web Management Workshop 2013 (IWMW 2013) event, University of Bath on 26 - 28th June 2013.
D3: a project to Develop Digital Data LiteracyKarl Donert
Initial results are presented for the D3 Project - Developing Digital Data literacy in schools. An Erasmus Plus project seeking to:
1. Promote the use of digital technologies and open data tools in learning and teaching
2. Increase the capacity to integrate democratic engagement into educational plans and strategies
3. Establish suitable styles of learning to access and integrate open data into schools and
4. Improve educational stakeholders’ response to the need for data and information literacy in schools and teacher training.
The presentation focuses on the Comparative Review undertaken to examine the situation in partner countries.
It also looks forward to the teacher professional development course being developed and joining the Open Data Charter initiative.
Presentation given at the GeoDecade 2020-2030 conference on 24 November 2020
How you can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of teaching and learning...Jisc
Led by Sue Attewell, head of change - further education and skills, Jisc.
With contributions from
Claire George, programme leader in information and creative, Bridgend College
Anne Marggraf-Turley, ILT coordinator, Coleg Ceredigion
Connect more in Wales, Thursday 7 July 2016
The facets of open education. Resources, data and culture. Tuesday 17 September, 11:45 – 13:15 @ Room 13, Floor 2
Open data is data that can be freely used, reused and redistributed by anyone. Many institutes offer Open Educational Resources (OER) online. Education can benefit highly from open and linked data approaches.
Moderator: Doug Belshaw, Badges & Skills Lead, Mozilla Foundation
Panel members:
Jackie Carter, Senior Manager, MIMAS, Centre of Excellence, University of Manchester
Mathieu d’Aquin, Research Fellow, Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, UK
Davide Storti, Programme Specialist, Communication and Information Sector (CI), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
OKCon, Geneva, 16-18 September 2013
Kit-Catalogue - Discovering the Value of Equipment Sharing - Universities UK ...Martin Hamilton
Universities UK (UUK) 4th Annual Efficiency in Higher Education Conference talk from me and UCL's Jacky Pallas on accelerating equipment sharing. This covers Jisc initiatives such as our shared data centre and VAT cost sharing group, and our pilot of the Kit-Catalogue equipment database software - with a case study from UCL showing how they have used Kit-Catalogue.
Are we failing users? Can open approaches meet their needs? - Maura MarxJisc
Are we failing users? Can open approaches meet their needs?
Maura's plenary presentation at the Jisc/British Library Discovery Summit 2013
February 2013, London
Presentation on LinkedUp Project given at P2PU community meeting, 17th October 2013. The video is at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gh3PQYzTdJ4&feature=share
The Open Education Working Group: Bringing people and projects togetherMarieke Guy
Presentation given at Open Data in Education Seminar, St Petersburg, 10th March 2014: http://linkededucation.org/events/open-data-in-education-seminar-st-petersburg
Leveraging change through digital capability - James Clay, Chris Roberts, Tim...Jisc
Led by James Clay, project manager, Jisc.
With contributions from:
Chris Roberts, deputy learning resources manager/librarian, Lambeth College
Tim Linsey, director of Centre for Higher Education Research and Practice, Kingston University
Connect more in London, 29 June 2016
From Jisc's student experience experts group meeting in Birmingham on 21 April 2016.
https://www.jisc.ac.uk/events/student-experience-experts-group-meeting-20-apr-2016
How to equip researchers in managing data - JIsc Digital Festival 2015Jisc
This demonstration will encourage information professionals, librarians and research support staff to become familiar with online training materials and methods to support researchers in achieving research data management best practice.
Digital scholarship and identifiers - Geoffrey Bilder, CrossReff
Share update – Elliott Shore, Association of Research Libraries
Jisc Monitor update – Neil Jacobs, Jisc
Infrastructure and services to track research activity – Daniel Hook, Digital Science
Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016
B2: Open Up: Open Data in the Public SectorMarieke Guy
Parallel session [B2: Open Up: Open Data in the Public Sector] run at the Institutional Web Management Workshop 2013 (IWMW 2013) event, University of Bath on 26 - 28th June 2013.
D3: a project to Develop Digital Data LiteracyKarl Donert
Initial results are presented for the D3 Project - Developing Digital Data literacy in schools. An Erasmus Plus project seeking to:
1. Promote the use of digital technologies and open data tools in learning and teaching
2. Increase the capacity to integrate democratic engagement into educational plans and strategies
3. Establish suitable styles of learning to access and integrate open data into schools and
4. Improve educational stakeholders’ response to the need for data and information literacy in schools and teacher training.
The presentation focuses on the Comparative Review undertaken to examine the situation in partner countries.
It also looks forward to the teacher professional development course being developed and joining the Open Data Charter initiative.
Presentation given at the GeoDecade 2020-2030 conference on 24 November 2020
How you can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of teaching and learning...Jisc
Led by Sue Attewell, head of change - further education and skills, Jisc.
With contributions from
Claire George, programme leader in information and creative, Bridgend College
Anne Marggraf-Turley, ILT coordinator, Coleg Ceredigion
Connect more in Wales, Thursday 7 July 2016
The facets of open education. Resources, data and culture. Tuesday 17 September, 11:45 – 13:15 @ Room 13, Floor 2
Open data is data that can be freely used, reused and redistributed by anyone. Many institutes offer Open Educational Resources (OER) online. Education can benefit highly from open and linked data approaches.
Moderator: Doug Belshaw, Badges & Skills Lead, Mozilla Foundation
Panel members:
Jackie Carter, Senior Manager, MIMAS, Centre of Excellence, University of Manchester
Mathieu d’Aquin, Research Fellow, Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, UK
Davide Storti, Programme Specialist, Communication and Information Sector (CI), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
OKCon, Geneva, 16-18 September 2013
Kit-Catalogue - Discovering the Value of Equipment Sharing - Universities UK ...Martin Hamilton
Universities UK (UUK) 4th Annual Efficiency in Higher Education Conference talk from me and UCL's Jacky Pallas on accelerating equipment sharing. This covers Jisc initiatives such as our shared data centre and VAT cost sharing group, and our pilot of the Kit-Catalogue equipment database software - with a case study from UCL showing how they have used Kit-Catalogue.
Umfrage im Auftrag des Bundesamts für Kommunikation (BAKOM) zu Big Data in der Schweiz: "Chancen, Risiken und Handlungsbedarf des Bundes". BFH-interne Präsentation der Studien-Ergebnisse. November 2015.
Presentation of the results and discussion of the implications of the pilot survey among Swiss cultural heritage institutions with regard to open data and crowdsourcing
Aligning stakeholders' perspectives in Open Government Data CommunityAdegboyega Ojo
Open Government Data (OGD) has gained momentum and a large number of portals have become available providing all kind of data. There are many practices available and all kind of technologies enabling the opening of data. Yet the field is fragmented and effective use of open data requires knowledge found in different communities. The goal of the proposed workshop is two-fold. First it aims to contribute to better and shared understanding of concerns across core stakeholder groups in the OGD community. Second, it intends to show and discuss how some emerging technological solutions in the social semantic web and linked data technology domain could effectively address some of these concerns when considered as a part of a socio-technical ensemble.
Presentation given to EC project officers as part of workshops run by the FOSTER (foster open science) project. The presentation covers the Horizon 2020 open data pilot.
Open Source & Open Data Session report from imaGIne 2014 ConferenceGSDI Association
Session report from the imaGIne 2014 Conference held in Berlin, Germany, in October 2014. Session was chaired by Dr. Gabor Remetey-Fulopp, of HUNAGI, who were co-organisers for Session 8C1.
Presentation describing the purpose of the European Data Portal project. The launching of the European Data Portal is one of the key steps the European Commission is taking in supporting the access to public data.
A short introduction to GEO governance, the GEO Work Programme and the GEO community for the FOSS4G audience. Contributions on GEOGLOWS, eShape and GEOHack19 from Julia Wagemann, Valentina Balcan and Diana Mastracci.
In the age of Big Data, filtering mechanisms have to professionalized to increase accessibility to data. This presentation, held at Knowledge Management Academy in Vienna, shows how technologies derived from the Semantic Web can help to establish more efficient means to manage data and information.
Opportunity and risk in social computing environmentsHazel Hall
Hazel Hall's invited paper presented at SLA Eastern Canada Members' Day, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 29 April 2009. This presentation draws on the project work discussed in the report at: http://drhazelhall.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/soc_comp_proj_rep_public_2008.pdf
Using Wikidata for Performing Arts Related DataBeat Estermann
Slides of the Webinar held on 5 June 2024 entitled "Using Wikidata for Performing Arts Related Data" in the context of the Open Science Open Science for Arts, Design and Music Project.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Open_Science_for_Arts,_Design_and_Music/Training/Webinars#Using_Wikidata_for_Performing_Arts_Related_Data
Transformación digital del patrimonio cultural y sus implicaciones practicasBeat Estermann
Public lecture on the digital transformation of the public sector, the heritage sector, recent trends, and practical implications.
BUAP Central Library, Puebla, Mexico - 11 April 2024.
(Spanish translation of the original slide deck in English)
Digital Transformation of the Heritage Sector and its Practical ImplicationsBeat Estermann
Public lecture on the digital transformation of the public sector, the heritage sector, recent trends, and practical implications.
BUAP Central Library, Puebla, Mexico - 11 April 2024.
(A Spanish version of the slide deck is available)
Linked Open Data for the Performing Arts: Latest Developments in Switzerland,...Beat Estermann
Presentation at conference "PERFORMANCE – PRODUCTION – DATA. Modeling and Communicating Event-related Information", Leipzig (Germany), 14-15 September 2023
Estermann Panel on Authority Files, 3 June 2020Beat Estermann
Panel on Authority Files and Controlled Vocabularies: Welcome and Introduction; GLAM Inventory; Named Entities in the Context of the LOD Ecosystem for the Performing Arts. Side programme of the Swiss Open Cultural Data Hackathon 2020, Online Session, 3 June 2020.
Estermann Linked Data Ecosystem for Heritage Data - 29 Feb 2020Beat Estermann
Linked Open Data Ecosystem for Heritage Data. Presentation held at the 5th Anniversary of the Swiss Open Cultural Data Hackathon on 29 February 2020 at the National Library in Bern.
Overview of OpenGLAM in Switzerland and the latest activities of the Bern University of Applied Sciences in the area of open cultural data. Presentation held at the Conference on Conference on Open Data and Open Maps for Heritage Protection in Bellinzona, Switzerland, 21 Feb 2020.
BFH-Studie Digitalisierung und Umwelt - BAFU-Kaderklausur - 20191127Beat Estermann
Digitalisierung und Umwelt: Chancen, Risiken und Handlungsbedarf. Wichtigste Ergebnisse einer Studie im Auftrag des Bundesamts für Umwelt (BAFU). Präsentation anlässlich der BAFU-Kaderklausur vom 27. November 2019 in Gwatt/Thun.
Slides for the GLAM Panel at WikidataCon 2019 in Berlin, 25. October 2019, on the role of Wikidata within data ecosystems extending beyond the realm of Wikimedia projects. Authors: Susanna Ånäs (Finland); Mike Dickison (New Zealand); Joachim Neubert (Germany); Beat Estermann (Switzerland).
Estermann ENICPA Wiki Loves Performing Arts 20191022Beat Estermann
Presentation at the ENICPA Round Table on 22 October 2019 in Prague on Wikidata and performing arts. Author: Beat Estermann, Bern University of Applied Sciences.
Bootstrapping the International Knowledge Base for the Performing ArtsBeat Estermann
Presentation at the Conference "Open Data - Open Access: New Frontiers for Archives and Digital Platforms Dedicated to the Performing Arts" in Rome, 7 June 2019.
Beat Estermann, Bern University of Applied Sciences
Workshop "Performing Arts Database based on Wikidata"Beat Estermann
Workshop at the occasion of the Congress of the Society of Theatre Research (Gesellschaft für Theaterwissenschaft), Düsseldorf, Germany, 10 November 2018.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
Donate to charity during this holiday seasonSERUDS INDIA
For people who have money and are philanthropic, there are infinite opportunities to gift a needy person or child a Merry Christmas. Even if you are living on a shoestring budget, you will be surprised at how much you can do.
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-to-donate-to-charity-during-this-holiday-season/
#charityforchildren, #donateforchildren, #donateclothesforchildren, #donatebooksforchildren, #donatetoysforchildren, #sponsorforchildren, #sponsorclothesforchildren, #sponsorbooksforchildren, #sponsortoysforchildren, #seruds, #kurnool
State crafting: Changes and challenges for managing the public finances
Estermann wikimania2015 glam-survey_20150719
1. OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey: Preliminary Results
from Finland, Poland, Switzerland and The Netherlands
Beat Estermann, 19 July 2015 – Wikimania, Mexico City
▶ Bern University of Applied Sciences | E-Government Institute || Open Knowledge | OpenGLAM Working Group
Palacio de Bellas Artes, Mexico City. Photo by Xavier Quetzalcoatl Contreras Castillo. CC BY-SA 3.0 (Wikimedia Commons).
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.
2. ▶ Introduction to the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey Project
▶ Preliminary Results: Dutch, Finnish, Polish and Swiss Data Sets
▶ Implications for GLAM Outreach
▶ Outlook
Welcome!
4. ▶ Online survey conducted among heritage institutions throughout the
world in 2014/2015.
▶ Focusing on questions related to digitization, exchange of metadata,
open data/open content, semantic web,
social media, crowdsourcing
▶ Inspired by an earlier pilot survey, carried out in Switzerland in 2012
▶ Organized in a federative manner, which means that the organization
depends on volunteers and partners in each country
What is the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey about?
5. ▶ Measure the state of advancement of OpenGLAM in the participating
countries
▶ Inform the GLAM community about the latest developments in the area of
OpenGLAM
▶ Identify potential partners for open data and/or crowdsourcing projects
▶ Use the study report as a communication instrument to promote
OpenGLAM
▶ Provide international comparisons:
• Allowing each country to see where it stands compared to other countries.
• Provide the international OpenGLAM community with a tool that helps it better
understand the particularities of each country
What do we want to achieve?
6. Overview of participating countries
Further countries are welcome to join; but hurry up!
Overview: https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/OpenGLAM_Benchmark_Survey/Participating_countries
Participation status (as of 10 July 2015)
Dark Green: Completed
Light Green: Initial commitment
Yellow: Clarification needed / presently insufficient support
Underlying graphic file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BlankMap-World-v2.png Roke et al. (CC-by-sa)
7. Preliminary Results
• Dutch, Finnish, Polish, and Swiss Data Sets
• Focus on Open Content and
Collaborative Content Creation / Crowdsourcing
8. CH (incl. FL) FI NL PL
N institutions
contacted[1]
1543 (11) 356 1393 669
N responses[2] 278 (2) 81 146 79
Response rate[3] 19% 26% 12% 12%
– Archives 27% 50% 16% 21%
– Libraries 29% 37% 15% 17%
– Museums 16% 21% 10% 10%
N inhabitants (2013) 8.1 mio. 5.4 mio. 16.8 mio. 38.5 mio.
GLAM density (GLAMs/mio.
inhabitants)
189 66 83 17
Dutch, Finnish, Polish, and Swiss Data Samples
Notes:
[1] Number of institutions which have been contacted (each institution is counted once, even if it has been contacted via
several email addresses or through different channels, e.g. follow-up phone calls in addition to e-mail reminders).
[2] Number of institutions which have completed the questionnaire (almost) in full, i.e. institutions which have responded to at
least 20 out of the 24 non-conditional questions of the questionnaire.
[3] For the purpose of the calculation of the response rate, institutions which have started to fill in the questionnaire but
dropped out after question A2 as they did not correspond to the survey's definition of heritage institutions, are counted as
responses.
9. Where do GLAMs stand with regard to…
…Open Data?
…Linked Data / Semantic Web?
…Digitization
…Open Content?
…Engaging Audiences on the Internet
…Collaborative Content Creation
What are the perceived risks and opportunities? (drivers vs. hindering factors)
What are the expected benefits?
Awareness Evaluation AdoptionTrialInterest
Innovation Diffusion Model,
Everett Rogers, 1962
Early Adopters
13.5%
Shareofinstitutions(%)
Innovators
2.5%
Early Majority
34%
Late Majority
34%
Laggards
16%
10. Finland, Poland, Switzerland, The Netherlands, all institution types combined, N = 584.
Cases with «stagnation» / «discontinuance» have been ignored.
Shareofinstitutions(%)
Innovators
2.5%
Early Majority
34%
Late Majority
34%
Early Adopters
13.5%
Laggards
16%
Collaborative content creation
Social media
Open content
Digitization
Linked data
Open data
Advanced implementation
Adoption
Trial
Evaluation
Interest
No interest
Diffusion of Innovative Practices among GLAMs
11. No interest Interest Evaluation Trial Adoption Advanced
implementation
Stagnation /
discontinuance
Open Data OD_interest = 0
(ODLD_interest = 0)
OD_interest = 1
(ODLD_interest = 1)
OD_metadata_5yrs_
avg >= 0.5%
OD_metadata_pres
_avg >= 0.5%
OD_metadata_pres
_avg > 10%
AND
OD_metadata_5yrs
_avg >
OD_metadata_pres
_avg + 10
metadata_pres_av
g > 50%
AND
OD_catalogues_pr
es > 50%
OD_metadata_pres_avg
>= 0.5%
AND
OD_metadata_pres_avg
< 66%
AND
OD_metadata_5yrs_avg
<=
OD_metadata_pres_avg
AND
imp_OD <= 3
Linked Data LD_interest = 0
(ODLD_interest = 0)
LD_interest = 1
(ODLD_interest = 1)
LD_metadata_5yrs_
avg >= 0.5%
LD_metadata_pres
_avg >= 0.5%
LD_metadata_pres
_avg > 10%
AND
LD_metadata_5yrs
_avg >
OD_metadata_pres
_avg + 10
LD_metadata_pres
_avg > 50%
AND
LD_catalogues_pre
s > 50%
LD_metadata_pres_avg
>=0.5%
AND
LD_metadata_pres_avg
< 66%
AND
LD_metadata_5yrs_avg
<=
LD_metadata_pres_avg
AND
imp_LD <= 3
Digitization DIGI_interest = 0 DIGI_interest = 1 DIGI_5yrs_avg >=
0.5%
DIGI_pres_avg >=
0.5%
(DIGI_pres_avg >
10%
AND
DIGI_5yrs_avg >
DIGI_pres_avg +5)
OR
(DIGI_pres_avg >
5%
AND
DIGI_5yrs_avg >
DIGI_pres_avg
+10)
DIGI_pres_avg >
50%
DIGI_pres_avg >= 0.5%
AND
DIGI_pres_avg < 66%
AND
DIGI_5yrs_avg <=
DIGI_pres_avg
AND
imp_DIGI <= 3
Documentation: Thresholds / Rules for the Assignment of Cases to Innovation Adoption Stages (1/2)
12. No interest Interest Evaluation Trial Adoption Advanced
implementation
Stagnation /
discontinuance
Open Content OC_interest = 0 OC_interest = 1 OC_5yrs_avg >= 0.5%OC_pres_avg >= 0.5% (OC_pres_avg > 10%
AND
OC_5yrs_avg >
OC_pres_avg +5)
OR
(OC_pres_avg >5%
AND
OC_5yrs_avg >
OC_pres_avg +10)
OC_pres_avg >
50%
OC_pres_avg >= 0.5%
AND
OC_pres_avg < 66%
AND
OC_5yrs_avg <=
OC_pres_avg
AND
imp_OC <= 3
Social Media SM_interest = 0 SM_interest = 1 SM_types_1yr_num >
0
SM_types_pres_num
> 0
(SM_types_pres_num
> 0
AND
SM_types_1yr_num >
SM_types_pres_num)
OR
(SM_types_pres_num
> 1
AND
SM_types_1yr_num
>=
SM_types_pres_num)
SM_types_pres_nu
m > 3
SM_types_pres_num > 0
AND
SM_types_pres_num < 4
AND
SM_types_1yr_num <
SM_types_pres_num
AND
imp_ENGAGE <= 3
Collaborative
Content
Creation
WPWM_interest = 0 WPWM_interest = 1 COLLAB_types_1yr_n
um > 0
COLLAB_types_pres_
num > 0) OR
Collab_prof_num > 0
(COLLAB_types_pres
_num > 0 AND
COLLAB_types_1yr_n
um >
COLLAB_types_pres_
num)
OR
(COLLAB_types_pres
_num > 1 AND
COLLAB_types_1yr_n
um >=
COLLAB_types_pres_
num)
COLLAB_types_pre
s_num > 2
COLLAB_types_pres_num
> 0
AND
COLLAB_types_pres_num
< 3 AND
COLLAB_types_1yr_num <
COLLAB_types_pres_num
AND
imp_COLLAB <= 3
Documentation: Thresholds / Rules for the Assignment of Cases to Innovation Adoption Stages (2/2)
14. Adoption Rates – Country Comparison
30%
6%
58%
15%
74%
26%
28%
6%
38%
12%
75%
13%
18%
4%
44%
12%
34%
8%
38%
10%
71%
31%
70%
17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Open data Linked data /
semantic web
Digitization Open content Social media Collaborative content
creation
Finland
Poland
Switzerland
The Netherlands
15. ▶ Heritage institutions with a local/regional focus are less likely to use social
media than other institutions
▶ The institutions’ size is positively correlated with the adoption of:
▶ open data
▶ linked data
▶ social media use
▶ collaborative content creation
▶ However, the institutions’ size is not related to their adoption of:
▶ digitization
▶ open content
▶ Higher levels of public funding are:
▶ positively related to the adoption of open data
▶ negatively related to the adoption of open content
Adoption Rates – Further Insights
18. 3%
6% 7%
15%
20%
4%
3%
7%
7%
3%
11% 6%
4%
3%
2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1 - Not important at
all
2 3 4 5 - Very important
Open data: importance vs. desirability (in % of institutions; N = 475)
Risks prevail
Equal risks and opportunities
Opportunities prevail
35%
21%
Open Data: Importance vs. Desirability
Motors
19. Open Content: Importance vs. Desirability
3%
5%
8%
16%
18%
5%
4%
7%
5%
2%
11%
7%
6%
2% 2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1 - Not important at
all
2 3 4 5 - Very important
Open content: importance vs. desirability (in % of institutions; N = 466)
Risks prevail
Equal risks and opportunities
Opportunities prevail
Motors
34%
24%
20. Collaborative Content Creation:
Importance vs. Desirability
9% 10% 9%
15%
9%
9% 8% 8%
2%
1%
10%
5%
2%
1%
0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1 - Not important at
all
2 3 4 5 - Very important
Collaborative content creation: importance vs. desirability
(in % of institutions; N = 438)
Risks prevail
Equal risks and opportunities
Opportunities prevail
24%
17%
Motors
21. Digitization as a Prerequisite for Open Content
5%
2% 2% 1% 2%
4%
19%
21%
9% 4%
1%
7%
11%
6%
0%
1%
2%
1%
0%
1%
2%
0%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
0% 1-19% 20-49% 50-79% 80% or more
Average percentage of objects already digitized
Expected digitization activities over the next 5 years
(in % of institutions; N = 457)
80% or more
50-79%
20-49%
1-19%
0%
23. Digitization Today – Country Comparison
1%
17%
0%
30%
50%
10%
2%
6%
1%
7%
0% 0%
2%
10%
1%
10%
5%
10%
13%
50%
10%
50%
25%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Text based
resources (365)
Two-dimensional
visual resources
(357)
Archival resources
(281)
Three-dimensional
man-made
movable objects
(314)
Natural resources
(47)
Geography based
resources (119)
Time based
resources (220)
Percentage of resources already digitized by the average institution (median)
(N is indicated for each object type; the values for natural resources are not shown due to the small sample size)
Finland
Poland
Switzerland
The Netherlands
24. Digitization in 5 Years – Country Comparison
3%
45%
10%
50% 50%
30%
12%
30%
15%
35%
28%
20%
10%
50%
10%
50%
45%
50%50%
80%
25%
80%
40%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Text based
resources (318)
Two-dimensional
visual resources
(317)
Archival resources
(251)
Three-dimensional
man-made
movable objects
(279)
Natural resources
(39)
Geography based
resources (99)
Time based
resources (196)
Percentage of resources expected to be digitized in 5 years by the average institution (median)
(N is indicated for each object type; the values for natural resources are not shown due to the small sample
size)
Finland
Poland
Switzerland
The Netherlands
26. Open Content Today – Country Comparison
3%
5% 3%
1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percentage of resources already made available as open content by the average institution (median)
(N is indicated for each object type; the values for natural resources are not shown due to the small sample size;
“0%” value tags have been suppressed)
Finland
Poland
Switzerland
The Netherlands
27. Open Content in 5 Years – Country Comparison
0%
5%
2%
5%
10%
1%
3%5%
8%
2%
10%
30%
0% 0%0%
5%
0%
5%
10%
0%
5%
15%
50%
20%
25%
18%
10%
19%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percentage of resources expected to be made available as open content in 5 years by the average institution
(median)
(N is indicated for each object type; the values for natural resources are not shown due to the small sample size)
Finland
Poland
Switzerland
The Netherlands
28. Copyright Clearance as a Prerequisite for Open Content
Note: The data may be somewhat biased as it does - by definition - not include the data from
institutions who weren’t able to provide numbers regarding the copyright status of their objects.
31% 29%
47%
42%
59%
44%
18%
28%
27% 35%
35%
40%
29%
37%
37%
50%
33% 23%
10% 12%
8%
13%
34%
15%
8% 13% 8% 7% 4% 6%
11%
6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
What is the copyright situation of the objects in your collection?
(average percentages for each object type; N is indicated for each object type)
copyright status unknown
copyright controlled by third parties
copyright controlled by the institution
public domain
29. Benefits of Open Content
D7: In the case of my institution, ‘open content’ is an important means…
N = 456
30. Challenges Related to Open Content
D8: For my institution, these are important challenges related to ‘open content’…
N = 480
31. Risks Related to Open Content
D9: For my institution, these are important risks related to ‘open content’…
N = 459
33. ▶ 14% of responding GLAMs have staff members who are
involved in Wikipedia as part of their job
(28% have staff members who are involved in Wikipedia either as part of
their job or during leisure time)
▶ Wikimedia Commons: 4%
▶ Wikidata: 2%
GLAM Involvement in Wikipedia
34. Most popular crowdsourcing approaches
N = 171
Note: The graph summarizes the data from the institutions which indicated that they are presently
using at least one crowdsourcing approach or are planning to use one within the next year.
35. Purpose of crowdsourcing
Note: This question was asked only to institutions which indicated that they are presently using at
least one crowdsourcing approach or are planning to use one within the next year.
N = 133
36. Risks and Challenges of Crowdsourcing
Note: This question was asked only to institutions which indicated that they are presently using at
least one crowdsourcing approach or are planning to use one within the next year.
N = 132
37. What are the Implications for GLAM
Outreach?
Summing up the main findings...
38. ▶ Digitization is a widespread practice in the Dutch and Finnish GLAM
sector, with adoption rates well above 50%.
(Switzerland and Poland are lagging behind; there are considerable differences between
countries and institution types).
▶ The Use of Social Media is a widespread practice in the Finnish, Polish,
and Dutch GLAM sector, with adoption rates of 70% and more.
(Switzerland is lagging behind; there are considerable differences between countries and
institution types).
▶ Open Data and Open Content are about to diffuse within the GLAM
sector; for Open Data we are observing an overall adoption rate of ca.
26%; for Open Content the adoption rate is about 17%.
(The Netherlands are ahead of the other three countries; there are considerable
differences between countries and institution types).
▶ Collaborative Content Creation is diffusing slightly more slowly than
Open Data / Open Content
(There are considerable differences between countries).
▶ These findings are reflected in the importance accorded to the various practices;
over 40% of respondents consider Open Data and Open Content as important; ca.
25% say so with regard to Collaborative Content Creation.
Diffusion of Various Practices
39. ▶ Over the next 5 years we will see leaps in digitization activities and
in freely licensed content. – Are we ready?
▶ 70% of institutions think that opening up content helps them better
fulfill their core mission.
▶ In general, issues related to copyright clearance may be an excuse,
but not a show-stopper regarding the opening up of content; across
all object types, institutions may release at least 50% of their holdings
as open content.
▶ When it comes to promoting the opening up of content, the present
mindset of GLAMs poses two major challenges: their aversion
against the prospect of commercial use of open content, and their
reluctance to let third parties modify the content.
Prerequisites for Open Content
40. ▶ The greatest challenges regarding open content are the time effort
and expense related to the digitization and the documentation of content.
Other important challenges comprise the time effort and expense related
to rights clearance, lack of staff skills as well as technical challenges.
▶ The greatest risks associated with open content are re-use of content
without proper attribution or mis-use / mis-interpretation of the content.
Another important risk are copyright infringements.
▶ Roughly one third of the institutions is worried about issues related to
rights clearance and tracking the use of the content.
▶ When it comes to opening up content, loss of revenues, or diminished
brand value are only minor preoccupations.
Challenges / Risks related to Open Content
41. ▶ Ca. 24% of GLAMs consider Collaborative Content Creation as
important and believe that the opportunities prevail over the risks
▶ Ca. 14% of GLAMs are already involved in Wikipedia.
▶ Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata still seem to play a minor role
for GLAMs (with 4% and 2% of institutions involved).
Involvement in Wikipedia
43. ▶ Data collection in further countries – Your support is
appreciated… http://survey.openglam.ch
▶ Context analysis (searching for explanations for country
differences)
▶ More detailed analyses – Feel free to join!
▶ Publication of country reports
▶ Publication of an international report in the first half of
2016
▶ Explore further uses of the GLAM inventory as a by-
product of the survey
What’s next?