This document summarizes the changes between the 2005 and 2015 versions of the European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ESG). The 2015 version aims to increase clarity and applicability, strengthen links to other European frameworks, and focus more on student learning experiences and institutional responsibility for quality assurance. Key changes include additional standards addressing qualifications frameworks, recognition principles, and periodic program reviews. The document also discusses how the revised ESG supports automatic recognition across Europe by fostering mutual trust and highlights opportunities to learn more about implementing the ESG through upcoming workshops.
Presentation on how students and student representatives can affect the Quality Assurance Processes, at each stage of Quality Assurance, from determining requirements, to internal quality assurance to external quality assurance.
Delivered at the QA Peer Learning Stakeholders Workshop organised by the National Centre for Professional Education Quality Assurance Foundation (ANQA) in Yerevan, Armenia on 25-01-2017.
Presentation on how students and student representatives can affect the Quality Assurance Processes, at each stage of Quality Assurance, from determining requirements, to internal quality assurance to external quality assurance.
Delivered at the QA Peer Learning Stakeholders Workshop organised by the National Centre for Professional Education Quality Assurance Foundation (ANQA) in Yerevan, Armenia on 25-01-2017.
Two years after Yerevan: progress so farColin Tück
Presentation on the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes at the international conference "Single Accreditation of Joint Programmes - Turning a Bologna Guideline into Reality", 30 May 2017, Vilnius
Conclusions of the PHExcel (Professional Higher Education Excellence Seminar)Anthony Fisher Camilleri
Conclusions of the PHExcel Conference on Excellence in Professional Higher Education, held in London on 18th-19th November 2015, delivered by Anthony F. Camilleri (Knowledge Innovation Centre).
Day 1 of the SLN SOLSummit 2010. February 23, 2010. Rob Piorkowski's presentation on the SLN/Quality Matters Initiative
http://slnsolsummit2010.edublogs.org
Marking Summative Assessments with GradeMarkGAVIN INNES
Poster summarising the use of Turnitin's GradeMark with an online submission and marking process. Poster layout created in Adobe Illustrator with creative commons graphics from Pixabay.
Two years after Yerevan: progress so farColin Tück
Presentation on the European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes at the international conference "Single Accreditation of Joint Programmes - Turning a Bologna Guideline into Reality", 30 May 2017, Vilnius
Conclusions of the PHExcel (Professional Higher Education Excellence Seminar)Anthony Fisher Camilleri
Conclusions of the PHExcel Conference on Excellence in Professional Higher Education, held in London on 18th-19th November 2015, delivered by Anthony F. Camilleri (Knowledge Innovation Centre).
Day 1 of the SLN SOLSummit 2010. February 23, 2010. Rob Piorkowski's presentation on the SLN/Quality Matters Initiative
http://slnsolsummit2010.edublogs.org
Marking Summative Assessments with GradeMarkGAVIN INNES
Poster summarising the use of Turnitin's GradeMark with an online submission and marking process. Poster layout created in Adobe Illustrator with creative commons graphics from Pixabay.
Quality System at Miguel Hernández Uniersity: what, who, how we develop our assurance system and our excellence system. PPT target: Colleagues from other universities
Presentation given at the Service Design and Delivery in a Digital Age - Academies for EaP countries organised by the SIGMA Programme and the GiZ Eastern Partnership Regional Fund. Topic 3: Quality management systems and quality culture.
Dmitry Maslov NISPAcee 2014 Conference CAF in TatarstanDmitry Maslov
Raising Effectiveness and Quality in Public Administration through Application of the Common Assessment Framework
(CAF Model): Tatarstan Case
Presentation at the 22nd NISPAcee Annual Conference "Government vs. Governance in Central and Eastern Europe From Pre-Weberianism to Neo-Weberianism?" May 22-24, 2014, Budapest, Hungary
UNI-QM has developed a methodology for the lifelong learning quality management system called UNI-QM Framework for Quality Management which embeds a learning process into a self-improving approach. UNI-QM has developed a unique pathway to excellence lifelong learning centres as well as a full overview of a set of resources that accompanies people on their journey and to provide a better understanding of the framework. These resources are:
Case studies to give the user a direct approach to the topic, contributing to concrete experience and observation and reflection.
Processes and indicators: that will help the users to form abstracts concepts and to directly test those processes in new situations.
Benchmarking tools: to promote observation and reflection among users.
Training Needs Assessment in Public Organisations, Helena Rato; David FerrazDavid Ferraz
David Ferraz and Helena Ratos' presentation on the IASIA 2008 international congress, Uganda, July, 2008.
The presentation focus on how to indetify Training Needs in Public Organisations and link them with the public administration strategy. MANFOP methodology
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
ESG 2015 - what's new for trust and recognition?
1. European Quality Assurance
Register for Higher Education
ESG 2015 – what's new for
trust and recognition?
Regional Seminar on Quality Assured Automatic Recognition
Zagreb, 21 January 2016
Colin Tück
2. ESG 2005 → 2015
Starting points for revision:
“improve their clarity, applicability and usefulness,
including their scope”
Keep strength, overcome weaknesses
Adapt to new developments
The 2015 version of the ESG
More firmly embedded in “EHEA infrastructure” (e.g. links
to QF, LRC, ECTS, etc.)
More common ground in QA across Europe
➔ EHEA grew closer together (at least in QA)
3. QA & ESG 2015: what does
it mean for recognition?
More awareness for link QA ↔ recognition due to
goal of automatic recognition
ESG purposes: “support mutual trust, thus
facilitating recognition and mobility within and
across national borders”
Focus on institutional responsibility
S&G for internal quality assurance (Part 1)
Quality of the student learning experience
Design and review of programmes and qualifications
4. ESG 2005 – Part 1 ESG 2015 – Part 1
1.1 Policy and procedures for quality
assurance
1.1 Policy for quality assurance
1.2 Approval, monitoring and periodic
review of programmes and awards
1.2 Design and approval of programmes
1.3 Assessment of students 1.3 Student-centred learning, teaching
and assessment
1.4 Quality assurance of teaching staff 1.4 Student admission, progression,
recognition and certification
1.5 Learning resources and student
support
1.5 Teaching staff
1.6 Information systems 1.6 Learning resources and student
support
1.7 Public information 1.7 Information management
1.8 Public information
1.9 On-going monitoring and periodic
review of programmes
(table by Achim Hopbach)
5. ESG 2005 – Part 2 ESG 2015 – Part 2
2.1 Use of internal quality assurance
procedures
2.1 Consideration of internal quality
assurance
2.2 Development of external quality
assurance processes
2.2 Designing methodologies fit for
purpose
2.3 Criteria for decisions 2.3 Implementing processes
2.4 Processes fit for purpose 2.4 Peer-review experts
2.5 Reporting 2.5 Criteria for outcomes
2.6 Follow-up procedures 2.6 Reporting
2.7 Periodic reviews 2.7 Complaints and appeals
2.8 System-wide analyses
(table by Achim Hopbach)
6. QA & ESG 2015: link to
qualifications & recognition
ESG 1.2 (standard):
qualification [...] should [...] refer to the correct level of the national
qualifications framework for higher education and, consequently, to the
Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area.
ESG 1.4 (guideline):
institutional practice for recognition being in line with the principles of the
Lisbon Recognition Convention
ESG 1.9 (standard):
periodically review their programmes to ensure that they achieve the
objectives set for them and respond to the needs of students and society
ESG 2.1 (standard):
address the effectiveness of the internal quality assurance processes
described in Part 1 of the ESG.
7. QA & ESG 2015: the
European level
EQAR: Register of compliant QA agencies
External review of agencies every 5 years
Increasing focus on monitoring during cycle
Substantive Change Reports
Annual Updates
Complaints Policy
Cross-border external QA, European Approach
for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes
Increasing reliance on ESG as common ground
Possible impact on recognition based on ESG?
8. Join us to:
Learn more about the ESG directly from their authors
Benefit from exchanges with peers on good practices
Overcome challenges in translating the ESG into practice
In the spring of 2016, 5 events:
Webinars on 17 February 2016 & 13 April 2016
Workshop in Amsterdam, Netherlands, on 14-15 March 2016
Workshop in Vienna, Austria on 9-10 May 2016
Workshop in Lisbon, Portugal on 6-7 June 2016
Registrations is open now, participation is free of charge
(participants arrange their own travel/accommodation)
More soon at www.equip-project.eu