The document provides a bibliography of 75 sources related to licensing and negotiation of electronic resources. The sources cover topics such as pricing models, consortial licensing, tracking licenses, standards for sharing electronic resources, negotiating strategies and tactics, and copyright implications of licensing digital content. The bibliography includes books, book chapters, and articles from library journals published between 1999 and 2017.
Powered by change or spinning our wheels: The chaotic world of electronic res...Jennifer Richard
Over the last twenty years, library collections have gone from primarily print to overwhelmingly electronic. In our efforts to keep pace with these changes, we have attempted to fit square pegs into round holes – the round holes being our traditional integrated library systems (ILS) and our traditional staffing structures within libraries. It is now apparent that many of those traditional library tasks of ordering and receiving print materials, labelling, shelving, tracking and claiming are fading into history. Now librarians and library staff are consumed by many new challenges including: ejournal packages and inaccurate title lists, changing standards (Counter 3 or Counter 4, KBART), individual subscriptions each with their own license, interpretation of licenses, new copyright laws, management of usernames and passwords for multiple databases and subscriptions, perpetual rights, discovery layers, indexing, resolvers, proxy services, unwieldy statistics and the lack of time to collect and analyse them, plus ebooks. Based on data collected, as part of the CAUL Electronic Resources Management Survey in 2014, funded by the CAUL Innovation and Research Grant, this session will review the current state of ERMS in academic libraries in Atlantic Canada and discuss possible solutions for better management of these electronic resources.
Metadata enriching and filtering for enhanced collection discoverability Getaneh Alemu
The return on investment for academic libraries is chiefly tied to access, usage and impact. Without accurate, consistent and quality metadata on the one hand, and an easy-to-use and effective discovery service on the other, these valuable resources may remain invisible and inaccessible to users. In this talk, Getaneh aims to present four overarching metadata principles, namely: metadata enriching, linking, openness and filtering. And how these ideas help shape the metadata creation and discovery services at Solent University – focusing on the implementation of RDA and FRBR as well as the use of subject headings and authority controls.
Powered by change or spinning our wheels: The chaotic world of electronic res...Jennifer Richard
Over the last twenty years, library collections have gone from primarily print to overwhelmingly electronic. In our efforts to keep pace with these changes, we have attempted to fit square pegs into round holes – the round holes being our traditional integrated library systems (ILS) and our traditional staffing structures within libraries. It is now apparent that many of those traditional library tasks of ordering and receiving print materials, labelling, shelving, tracking and claiming are fading into history. Now librarians and library staff are consumed by many new challenges including: ejournal packages and inaccurate title lists, changing standards (Counter 3 or Counter 4, KBART), individual subscriptions each with their own license, interpretation of licenses, new copyright laws, management of usernames and passwords for multiple databases and subscriptions, perpetual rights, discovery layers, indexing, resolvers, proxy services, unwieldy statistics and the lack of time to collect and analyse them, plus ebooks. Based on data collected, as part of the CAUL Electronic Resources Management Survey in 2014, funded by the CAUL Innovation and Research Grant, this session will review the current state of ERMS in academic libraries in Atlantic Canada and discuss possible solutions for better management of these electronic resources.
Metadata enriching and filtering for enhanced collection discoverability Getaneh Alemu
The return on investment for academic libraries is chiefly tied to access, usage and impact. Without accurate, consistent and quality metadata on the one hand, and an easy-to-use and effective discovery service on the other, these valuable resources may remain invisible and inaccessible to users. In this talk, Getaneh aims to present four overarching metadata principles, namely: metadata enriching, linking, openness and filtering. And how these ideas help shape the metadata creation and discovery services at Solent University – focusing on the implementation of RDA and FRBR as well as the use of subject headings and authority controls.
The AIRCC's International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology (IJCSIT) is devoted to fields of Computer Science and Information Systems. The IJCSIT is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published in electronic form as well as print form. The mission of this journal is to publish original contributions in its field in order to propagate knowledge amongst its readers and to be a reference publication.
Opportunities beyond electronic resource management: An extension of the Core...NASIG
This presentation will provide an overview of current topics in digital scholarship and scholarly communications and draw connections between these new areas and the traditional skill sets of acquisitions and electronic resources employees. Commonalities between the skills outlined in the Core Competencies for Electronic Resources Librarians and those needed for success in digital scholarship and scholarly communications will form the basis of the presenter's recommendations for staff involvement in digital scholarship and scholarly communications.
An inventory of skills and talents among acquisitions staff will provide insight into the best ways to leverage existing human resources for the expansion of acquisitions duties into digital scholarship and scholarly communications. The presenter will outline new opportunities for acquisitions staff based on external research and internal staffing practice at the University of Montana.
Angela Dresselhaus
Acquisitions and Electronic Resources Librarian, University of Montana, Missoula
I am the acquisitions and electronic resources librarian at the University of Montana, Missoula where I manage the acquisition and electronic resources units. I am an active member of NASIG and serve as the NASIG Newsletter Editor-In-Chief.
Talk given in the context of ECML PKDD 2017 test of time award for the ECML PKDD 2007 paper "Randome k Labelsets: An Ensemble Method for Multi-Label Classification"
The Geography of Distance Education Research - Bibliographic Characteristics ...alanwylie
Keynote presentation by Olaf Zawacki-Richter, University of Oldenburg, Germany, Center for Lifelong Learning, Faculty of Educational and Social Sciences for the DEHub/ODLAA Education 2011 to 2021- Global challenges and perspectives of blended and distance learning the (14 to 18 February 2011).
The paper trail:steps towards a reference model for the metadata ecologyR. John Robertson
The paper trail: steps towards a reference model for the metadata ecology, presentation at ~CoLIS5 workshop. Presentation with Jane Barton. http://mwi.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/Colisworkshop.htm
Archiving- from June 2005.
please note this presentation is currently all rights reserved until i contact the other author.
The repository ecology: an approach to understanding repository and service i...R. John Robertson
An increasing number of university institutions and other organisations are deciding to deploy repositories and a growing number of formal and informal distributed services are supporting or capitalising on the information these repositories provide. Despite reasonably well understood technical architectures, early majority adopters may struggle to articulate their place within the actualities of a wider information environment. The idea of a repository ecology provides developers and administrators with a useful way of articulating and analysing their place in the information environment, and the technical and organisational interactions they have, or are developing, with other parts of such an environment. This presentation will provide an overview of the concept of a repository ecology and examine some examples from the domains of scholarly communications and elearning.
The AIRCC's International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology (IJCSIT) is devoted to fields of Computer Science and Information Systems. The IJCSIT is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published in electronic form as well as print form. The mission of this journal is to publish original contributions in its field in order to propagate knowledge amongst its readers and to be a reference publication.
Opportunities beyond electronic resource management: An extension of the Core...NASIG
This presentation will provide an overview of current topics in digital scholarship and scholarly communications and draw connections between these new areas and the traditional skill sets of acquisitions and electronic resources employees. Commonalities between the skills outlined in the Core Competencies for Electronic Resources Librarians and those needed for success in digital scholarship and scholarly communications will form the basis of the presenter's recommendations for staff involvement in digital scholarship and scholarly communications.
An inventory of skills and talents among acquisitions staff will provide insight into the best ways to leverage existing human resources for the expansion of acquisitions duties into digital scholarship and scholarly communications. The presenter will outline new opportunities for acquisitions staff based on external research and internal staffing practice at the University of Montana.
Angela Dresselhaus
Acquisitions and Electronic Resources Librarian, University of Montana, Missoula
I am the acquisitions and electronic resources librarian at the University of Montana, Missoula where I manage the acquisition and electronic resources units. I am an active member of NASIG and serve as the NASIG Newsletter Editor-In-Chief.
Talk given in the context of ECML PKDD 2017 test of time award for the ECML PKDD 2007 paper "Randome k Labelsets: An Ensemble Method for Multi-Label Classification"
The Geography of Distance Education Research - Bibliographic Characteristics ...alanwylie
Keynote presentation by Olaf Zawacki-Richter, University of Oldenburg, Germany, Center for Lifelong Learning, Faculty of Educational and Social Sciences for the DEHub/ODLAA Education 2011 to 2021- Global challenges and perspectives of blended and distance learning the (14 to 18 February 2011).
The paper trail:steps towards a reference model for the metadata ecologyR. John Robertson
The paper trail: steps towards a reference model for the metadata ecology, presentation at ~CoLIS5 workshop. Presentation with Jane Barton. http://mwi.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/Colisworkshop.htm
Archiving- from June 2005.
please note this presentation is currently all rights reserved until i contact the other author.
The repository ecology: an approach to understanding repository and service i...R. John Robertson
An increasing number of university institutions and other organisations are deciding to deploy repositories and a growing number of formal and informal distributed services are supporting or capitalising on the information these repositories provide. Despite reasonably well understood technical architectures, early majority adopters may struggle to articulate their place within the actualities of a wider information environment. The idea of a repository ecology provides developers and administrators with a useful way of articulating and analysing their place in the information environment, and the technical and organisational interactions they have, or are developing, with other parts of such an environment. This presentation will provide an overview of the concept of a repository ecology and examine some examples from the domains of scholarly communications and elearning.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
1. 1
ER&L 101 Course: Fundamentals of Licensing and Negotiation
Presented by Anjana Bhatt and Claire Dygert
Licensing and Negotiation Bibliography
Compiled by Anjana Bhatt
Articles & Books:
1. Alford, D. E. (2002). Negotiating and analyzing electronic license agreements. Law
Library Journal, 94(4), 621-644.
2. Anderson, R. (2006). Got a simple and innovative pricing model? You can keep it.
Against the Grain, 18(3), 22, 24.
3. Anderson, S. (2001). Statewide database licensing: Past life and future focus. Alki,
17(2), 16-17.
4. Anglada i de Ferrer, Lluis M., & Comellas, N. (2002). What's fair? Pricing models in the
electronic era. Library Management, 23(4/5), 227-233.
5. Baker, A. (2000). The impact of consortia on database licensing. Computers in Libraries,
20(6), 46-50.
6. Bebbington, L. W. (2001). Managing content: Licensing, copyright and privacy issues in
managing electronic resources. Legal Information Management, 1(2), 4-12.
7. Best, R. D. (2007). The network of Alabama academic libraries and the consortial
licensing of electronic databases. Against the Grain, 19(3), 16, 18, 20.
8. Blosser, J. (2000). Vendors and licenses: Adding value for customers. The Serials
Librarian, 38(1/2), 143-146.
9. Brevig, A. (2014). 7 Things to know before Signing a License. Online Searcher, 38(2),
54-57.
2. 2
10. Brown, K.C. (2008). Tactics and terms in the negotiation of electronic resource licenses.
Book Chapter. Electronic Resource Management in Libraries; Research and Practice.
Edited by Holly Yu & Scott Breivold. Pp 174-192.
11. Carpenter, T. (2007). Standards column--ready to work without a license? NISO's
shared E-resource understanding (SERU) working group. Against the Grain, 19(2), 92.
12. Carpenter, T.A. (2010) ONIX for publications licenses: Getting an electronic grip on
license information. Serials Librarian. 58(1-4), 79-86.
13. Chamberlain, C. K. (2008). Breaking the bottleneck: Using SERU to facilitate the
acquisition of electronic resources. College & Research Libraries News, 69(11), 700-
702.
14. Chandler, A. (2003). An application profile and prototype metadata management system
for licensed electronic resources. College & Research Libraries News, 64(11), 705.
15. Collins, M. (2007). SERU: An alternative to licensing--an interview with Selden Durgom
Lamoureux. Serials Review, 33(2), 122-128.
16. Cox, J. (2009). As I see it!--to license or not to license? SERU's the question. Against
the Grain, 21(1), 79-80.
17. Davis,T.L. & Feather, C. (2008). The evolution of license content. Book Chapter.
Electronic Resource Management in Libraries; Research and Practice. Edited by Holly
Yu & Scott Breivold.122-144.
18. Duranceau, E. F. (2000). License tracking. Serials Review, 26(3), 69-73.
19. Durrant, F. (2003). Negotiating an online contract. Legal Information Management, 3(1),
10-12.
20. Dygert, C. & Barrett, H. (2016). Building your licensing and negotiation skills toolkit.
Serials Librarian, 70(1-4), 333-342.
21. Dygert, C. & Langendorfer, J.M. (2014). Fundamentals of e-resources licensing. Serials
Librarian, 66 (1-4), 289-297.
3. 3
22. Dygert C.T. & Parang, E. (2013). Honing your negotiation skills. Serials Librarian. 64(1-
4) 105-110.
23. Elam, D. (2008). Negotiating contracts. AIIM E-Doc Magazine, 34-35.
24. Eschenfelder, K. R. (2008). Every library's nightmare? Digital rights management, use
restrictions, and licensed scholarly digital resources. College & Research Libraries,
69(3), 205-225.
25. Fisher, R & Ury, William. (2011) Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without
Giving In. Penguin Books, NY.
26. Grogg, J; Morris, S. E., Ashmore, B & Langendorfer, J.M. (2012) Serials Librarian, 62 (1-
4),183-188.
27. Guenther, K. (2000). Making smart licensing decisions. Computers in Libraries, 20(6),
58-60.
28. Hahn, K. (2006). Do I have to negotiate a license for every E-resource I buy? Developing
a best practice option. ARL, (248), 11.
29. Hahn, K. L. (2007). SERU (shared electronic resources understanding): Opening up new
possibilities for electronic resources transactions. D-Lib Magazine,
30. Harris, L. (2000). Getting what you bargained for. Library Journal (1976), 20-22.
31. Harris, L. (2002). Licensing digital content: A practical guide for librarians. (pp. 137)
American Lib. Assn.
32. Harris, L. E. (2007). Bargaining for information? Here's how to get what you need.
Information Outlook, 11(2), 38-39.
33. Harris, L. E. (2008). Licensing digital content: Part 2. Information Outlook, 12(8), 42.
34. Harris, L. E. (2008). Licensing digital content: Part I. Information Outlook, 12(7), 50-51.
35. Harris, L. E. (2009). Ensuring appropriate conditions of use. Information Outlook, 13(4),
51-52.
4. 4
36. Harris, L. E. (2009). Licenses and legalities. American Libraries, 40(6/7), 58-60.
37. Harris, L. E. (2009). Taking time to define terms in license agreements. AALL Spectrum,
13(4), 10A-1A.
38. Harris, L.E. (2017). Negotiating better license agreements through mindfulness.
Information Outlook, 21(3), 17-18.
39. Hattig, N. (2007). Innovations affecting us--A home-grown license manager: Is it for your
library? Against the Grain, 19(3), 88-89.
40. Helmer, J. F. (2004). Progress along the road to statewide database licensing. OLA
Quarterly, 9(4/V10 part no1), 10-11, 28.
41. Hiatt, C & Derrik, T. (2014). Principles of Negotiation. Technicalities. 34,(2),10-13.
42. Horava, T. (2005). Access policies and licensing issues in research libraries. Collection
Building, 24(1), 9-11.
43. Horava, T. (2007). Licensing e-resources for alumni: Reflections from a pilot project.
College & Research Libraries News, 68(7), 437-441.
44. Ives, G., & Fallon, S. (2009). Stung if you do, stung if you don't--the good and the bad of
the big deal. The Serials Librarian, 56(1-4), 163-167.
45. Jewell, T., Davis, T. L., Grover, D., & Grogg, J. E. (2007). Mapping license language for
electronic resource management. The Serials Librarian, 52(1/2), 29-36.
46. Johnson, J. L. (1999). License review and negotiation: Building a team-based
institutional process. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 23(3),
339-341.
47. Kim, S. (2005). The pay-per-use revolution in the internet world. Online Information
Review, 29(4), 419-421.
48. Lawrence, E. (2000). Licensing: A publisher's perspective. The Serials Librarian, 38(1/2),
147-153.
49. Learning to read licenses. (2002). The School Librarian's Workshop, 22(10), 2-3.
5. 5
50. Leiding, R. (2000). Understanding the licensing landscape: Highlights of the ACRL
preconference. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 24(2), 285-
287.
51. Lipinski, T. (2013). The Librarian’s Legal Companion for Licensing Information
Resources and Services. Neal-Schuman: Chicago.
52. Masango, C. A. (2005). Digital license agreements and their effects on acquisitions and
academic library users. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, 71(2),
127-135.
53. McGrath, M. (2003). The consortium site license: Is it a sustainable model? A
conference organized by the ingenta institute on 24 September 2002 at the royal society,
London. Interlending & Document Supply, 31(1), 42-45.
54. Meulen, K. (2003). Never pay full price: Negotiation strategies to use with online
resource companies. Voice of Youth Advocates, 26(1), 30-31.
55. Miller, K. M. (2003). Behind every great virtual library stand many great licenses. Library
Journal (1976), 20-22.
56. Moore, A. (2001). For immediate results, sign without thinking: Brief comments on
negotiating licensing agreements. Arkansas Libraries, 58(3), 18-20.
57. Nasea, M. (2000). The joy of license negotiation: Having fun and being careful. Library
Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 24(3), 436-439.
58. Parkhurst, C. A. (2002). Supporting the remote user of licensed resources. Attracting,
educating, and serving remote users through the web. (pp. 197-225) Neal-Schuman;
Neal-Schuman.
59. Pasanen, I. (2003). Committed to licensed information. IATUL Proceedings, 1-11.
60. Phillips, K. (2007). Licensing in an electronic world: A word of advice. Against the Grain,
19(4), 18, 20.
6. 6
61. Pike, G. H. (2002). The delicate dance of database licenses, copyright, and fair use.
Computers in Libraries, 22(5), 12-14, 63-4.
62. Richards, R. C. (2000). Licensing agreements: Contracts, the eclipse of copyright, and
the promise of cooperation. Publishing and the law. (pp. 89-107) Haworth Press;
Haworth Press.
63. Rolnik, Z., Lamoureux, S., & Smith, K. A. (2008). Alternatives to licensing of E-
resources. The Serials Librarian, 54(3/4), 281-287.
64. Rossignol, L. R. (2000). Realistic licensing or licensing realities: Practical advice on
license agreements. The Serials Librarian, 38(3/4), 357-361.
65. Rupp, N., & Mobley, L. (2007). Use of technology in managing electronic resource
workflow. Against the Grain, 19(5), 18, 20, 22.
66. Russell, C. (2003). Reading the fine print. School Library Journal, 49(1), 39.
67. Ruth, L. B., & Collins, M. (2008). License mapping for ERM systems: Existing practices
and initiatives for support. Serials Review, 34(2), 137-143.
68. Schachter, D. (2006). The rules of negotiation. Information Outlook, 10(9), 8-9.
69. Shell, R. (2006). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable
People. Penguin Books: NY.
70. Smith, S. (2008). Brewing the perfect blend of free and fee. EContent, 31(3), 20-24.
71. Soules, A. & Ferullo, D.L. (2008). Copyright implications for electronic resources. Book
Chapter. Electronic Resource Management in Libraries; Research and Practice. Edited
by Holly Yu & Scott Breivold. Pp 145-173.
72. Srivastava, S. D. (2002). Licensing electronic resources. The Serials Librarian, 42(1/2),
7-12.
73. Srodin, S. (2004). "Let's make a deal!" tips and tricks for negotiating content purchases.
Online (Weston, Conn.), 28(4), 16-19.
7. 7
74. Teaster-Woods, G. (2002). Tackling the monolith: Licensing management at the
consortial and local levels. The Serials Librarian, 42(3/4), 275-280.
75. Tenopir, C. (2008). SERU: A licensing advance. Library Journal (1976), 133(10), 26.
76. Yu, H. & Breivold, S. Eds. (2008) Electronic Resource Management in Libraries.
Research and Practice. New York, Information Science, Reference, 2008.
77. Watson, M. R. (2008). Licensing electronic resources: Is a lawyer in your future?
Technicalities, 28(4), 1, 11-13.
78. Wetzel, K. A. (2008). ONIX for publication licenses (ONIX-PL): Simplifying license
expression. D-Lib Magazine,
79. Will, L. G. (2008). Piercing the vendor veil. AALL Spectrum, 12(8), 24-5, 31.
80. Woodberry, E. (2002). Copyright vs. contract: Are they mutually exclusive? Australian
Academic & Research Libraries, 32 part i.e.33 no4, 269-274.
81. Wright, D. A. (2005). Library consortia: Do the models always work? Resource Sharing
and Information Networks, 18(1/2), 49-60.
Web Sites:
1. All you need to know about GDPR: https://corew.squarespace.com/s/Slides-All-you-
need-to-know-about-GDPR-0603compressed-spaj.pdf
2. CDL license Agreements Checklist: http://www.cdlib.org/vendors/checklist.html
3. Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf
4. Fair use of copyrighter material.
http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/copypol2.htm#course
5. GDPR –Deloitte:
https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/risk/deloitte-nl-risk-gdpr-
vision-approach.pdf
6. GDPR for Dummies: https://www.slideshare.net/CarolineBoscher/gdpr-for-dummies
7. GDPR presentation by USGIF:
https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/risk/deloitte-nl-risk-gdpr-
8. 8
vision-approach.pdf
8. GDPR: What does it mean for researchers
https://zenodo.org/record/1247457#.XFhbtao3mUl
9. GDPR – SAS: https://www.sas.com/content/dam/SAS/sv_se/doc/Presentation/sas-gdpr-
seminar-30-november-anna-borg.pdf
10. GDPR slides share https://www.slideshare.net/NaomiHolmes2/gdpr-presentation-slides
11. Google hit with first big GDPR fine over forced content; eight new complaints filed over
“right to access” https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/2019/02/google-hit-with-
first-gdpr-fine-over-forced-consent-eight-new-complaints-filed-over-right-to-access/
12. IFLA Licensing principles: https://www.ifla.org/publications/ifla-licensing-principles-2001
13. Keeping up with… General data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/keeping_up_with/gdpr
14. LIBLICENSE project: http://liblicense.crl.edu/
15. ONIX PL: https://www.editeur.org/21/ONIX-PL/
16. SERU Recommended Practices. https://groups.niso.org/workrooms/seru/
17. Title 17- Copyrights.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sup_01_17.html
18. Title 17: Chapter 1, section: 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html
19. Title 17: Chapter 1, section: 108. Limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by
libraries and archives,
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000108----000-.html
20. CONTU guidelines on Photocopying under ILL arrangements. http://digital-law-
online.info/CONTU/contu24.html
21. Reproduction of copyrighted works by educators and Librarians.
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ21.pdf
22. The TEACH Act http://www.copyright.com/media/pdfs/CR-Teach-Act.pdf
23. Distance Education and the TEACH Act.
http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=Distance_Education_and_the_TEACH_Act&T
emplate=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=25939
24. TEACH Act: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEACH_Act
25. Toolkit to help University Institutions Prepare for new Data Protection Legislation GDPR.
https://library.educause.edu/resources/2018/4/toolkit-to-help-university-institutions-
9. 9
prepare-for-new-data-protection-legislation-gdpr
26. U.S. Copyright Law. http://www.copyright.gov/title17/
27. What does GDPR mean for Libraries worldwide? ARL releases Issues brief.
https://www.arl.org/news/arl-news/4542-what-does-gdpr-mean-for-libraries-worldwide-
arl-releases-issue-brief#.XFhajao3mUk
28. What is GDPR? The summary guide to GDPR compliance in the UK
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/what-is-gdpr-uk-eu-legislation-compliance-summary-
fines-2018