English 1130Paper #4 – 2 PartsPart 1 -- Researched ArgumentP.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•3 views

English 1130 Paper #4 – 2 Parts Part 1 -- Researched Argument Part 2 – Visual Essay Part I For Paper #4 you will write a researched argument essay that addresses an issue related to the U.S. Judicial and/or prison system. Think about the documentary films we’ve watched (Into the Abyss, Lost for Life, The Farm), about any direct or indirect experiences you may have had, any discussions you may have engaged in (in personal as well as academic settings), any material you may have read (in and out of school). Decide on a topic that interests you, and devise a corresponding issue. The issue should be sufficiently complex – something debatable. Your paper shall be 10 pages, typed, double-spaced. It shall include proper source citations (in-text citations, work cited page). Follow these steps as you construct your paper:  Read what experts have already said about the issue.  Examine the various dimensions of the issue by analyzing and evaluating the experts’ arguments to determine which are the most convincing, which are reasonable but not terribly convincing, and which are flawed.  Articulate a thesis expressing your own position.  Discover solid reasons to support your thesis.  Return to the sources (research) to extract evidence you will use to back up each of your reasons. Ways to support your reasons:  Examples --  Based on a similarity to something that happened in the past.  Based on a similar case.  Based on a hypothetical situation.  Relevant Information –  Facts  Statistics  Points of interest  Statements, testimony, or other relevant information from acknowledged authorities.  Personal experience (be sure the experience relates directly to the reason you are developing).  Summarize alternative views and reasonable objections to your argument.  Respond tactfully to these alternative views.  Structure your essay (for this essay, I ask that you follow the following structure):  Introductory Section  Opener – Introduce the issue and invite your readers into the conversation.  Explanation and background – Familiarize your readers with the controversy. Give them the information they need to understand the issue at hand and make sense of the conversation.  Thesis – Give your stand on the issue – your main claim.  Body of the Essay  Alternative view on one aspect of the controversy  Your refutation of this view  Reason + evidence for your thesis  Alternative view on another aspect of the controversy  Your refutation of this view  Reason + evidence for your thesis *(This pattern continues until you have covered all the aspects of the issue you have chosen to focus on.)  Conclusion  Recap of the argument  Final statement of argument/final assessment of main issue and claim Part II Visual Essay – Select 5 images ...

Based on a hypothetical situation.
Relevant Information –
Facts
Statistics
Points of interest
Statements, testimony, or other relevant information from
acknowledged authorities.
Personal experience (be sure the experience relates directly
to the reason you are developing).
Summarize alternative views and reasonable objections
to your argument.
Respond tactfully to these alternative views.
Structure your essay (for this essay, I ask that you
follow the following structure):
Introductory Section
Opener – Introduce the issue and invite your readers
into the conversation.
Explanation and background – Familiarize your readers
with the controversy. Give them the information they need to
understand the issue at hand and make sense of the
conversation.
Thesis – Give your stand on the issue – your main
claim.
Body of the Essay
Alternative view on one aspect of the controversy
Your refutation of this view
Reason + evidence for your thesis
Alternative view on another aspect of the controversy
Your refutation of this view
Reason + evidence for your thesis
*(This pattern continues until you have covered all the aspects
of the issue you have chosen to focus on.)
Conclusion
Recap of the argument
Final statement of argument/final assessment of main
issue and claim

Part II
Visual Essay – Select 5 images that represent your perception of
the U. S. Judicial and/or prison system. Assemble these into a
1-page collage. Accompany your collage of images with a 1-2
paragraph discussion of the ‘story’ your visual text/visual
compilation tells.
An Executive Summary is a one-page document that outlines the
purpose, process, discussion, and findings of a report. You need
to provide a summary of the information you have gathered
about influence methods and your leaders.

Part I For Paper #4 you will write a researched argument essay that addresses an issue related to the U.S. Judicial and/or prison system. Think about the documentary films we’ve watched ( Into the Abyss , 13 th , The Farm , etc. ) , about any direct or indirect experiences you may have had, any discussions you may have engaged in (in personal as well as academic settings), any material you may have read (in and out of school) – including the readings I assigned. Decide on a topic that interests you, and devise a corresponding issue. The issue should be sufficiently complex – something debatable. Your paper shall be 10 pages, typed, double-spaced. It shall include proper source citations (in-text citations, work cited page). Follow these steps as you construct your paper: 1. Read what experts have already said about the issue. 2. Examine the various dimensions of the issue by analyzing and evaluating the experts’ arguments to determine which are the most convincing, which are reasonable but not terribly convincing, and which are flawed. 3. Articulate a thesis expressing your own position . 4. Discover solid reasons to support your thesis. 5. Return to the sources (research) to extract evidence you will use to back up each of your reasons. Ways to support your reasons: § Examples -- · Based on a similarity to something that happened in the past. · Based on a similar case. · Based on a hypothetical situation. § Relevant Information – · Facts · Statistics · Points of interest § Statements, testimony, or other relevant information from acknowledged authorities . § Personal experience (be sure the experience relates directly to the reason you are developing) . 6. Summarize alternative views and reasonable objections to your argument. 7. Respond tactfully to these alternative views. 8. Structure your essay (for this essay, I ask that you follow the following structure): Introductory Section · Opener – Introduce the issue and invite your readers into the conversation. · Explanation and background – Familiarize your readers with the controversy. Give them the information they need to understand the issue at hand and make sense of the conversation. · Thesis – Give your stand on the issue – your main claim. Body of the Essay · Alternative view on one aspect of the controversy · Your refutation of this view · Reason + evidence for your thesis · Alternative view on another aspect of the controversy · Your refutation of this view · Reason + evidence for your thesis *(This pattern continues until you have covered all the aspects of the issue you have chosen to focus on.) Conclusion · Recap of the argument · Final statement of argument/final assessment of main issue and claim Part II Visual Essay – Select 5 images that represent your perception of the U. S. Judicial and/or prison system. Assemble these into a 1-page collage. Accompany your collage of images wi.

Class 19jordanlachance

Final Research Paper Assignment Detailed GuidelinesYou are

AlysonDuongtw

Final Research Paper Assignment: Detailed Guidelines : You are asked to write a paper of 1700-words (minimum word count—any paper more than 150 words short of this minimum will not be accepted as a complete paper) to 2000-words (maximum word count—you may exceed this without penalty only if it essential to attaining the purpose of your paper). Your paper must cite the work of at least four philosophers studied during the course; there is no upper limit on the number of sources you may use. You have the option of writing a position paper or a comparison essay, depending on whether your plan is to argue in favor of an original position regarding the work and thought of at least four philosophers covered in the course or to comparatively evaluate the work of four or more philosophers. The topics below may be approached using either strategy; you may find that some will better lend themselves to a position paper (also known as an argumentative essay) and some will work better as a comparison essay. Choose the topic that most interests you and the strategy that works best for you. Topic Areas 1) Plato, Hume, Kant, and Russell: What is human knowledge? 2) Kant, Mill, Aristotle, and Kierkegaard: What is the ethical life? 3) Sartre, James, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche: What is an authentic, autonomous individual? 4) Descartes, Hume, Searle, and James: What is consciousness? 5) Plato, Kant, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche: What is truth? 6) Plato, Descartes, Hume, and Nietzsche: What is the soul or self (conceived as an entity that is purely mental, spiritual, or nonphysical)? 7) Sartre, James, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche: What is the role and value of religious faith? 8) Descartes, Kant, Sartre, and Nietzsche: What is free will and why does it matter? 9) Socrates/Plato, Russell, Sartre, and Nietzsche: What is the role and value of philosophy? This assignment is broken into two parts: Part I includes the following elements : - Title of the paper (please do not create a separate title page). Special note: DO NOT title your paper, "Final Paper." Your title is important; it should give the reader an immediate snapshot of what the paper will say and attempt to draw the reader in. - Introductory paragraph (including your thesis). This is a very important part of the paper--it should not be too short or too long (but probably at least five sentences). Begin by introducing the general topic and providing the reader with some rationale for why this topic, and what you will say about it, is worth thinking and reading about. Good writers usually begin with a "hook" in the first line to draw the reader in. You might pose an interesting or intriguing question, bring in an apposite quote, or make a controversial or surprising claim—even one that seems to go against your thesis. You will soon bring the reader around to what your position is when you state your thesis, which is usually very near the end of the first paragraph. The introductory p ...

Arguments

elevatecymru

EAPP-Position-Paper.pptx

AixingMontefalcon

Q4-EAPP.pptx

ericjordanmanuevo

Argument paperEnglish 1 Spring 2014 Argument Assignment Paper.docx

rossskuddershamus

Argument paper/English 1 Spring 2014 Argument Assignment Paper.doc PAGE English 1: Argumentative Essay Assignment The Assignment: Write a six-to-ten page argument paper that addresses a current issue that will address our theme of the impact of technology on communication on ourselves, on our world and on what it means to be human (Barrios, 583). The topic and the issue for this paper is the same as your exploratory paper assignment. The purpose of this paper is to present your position on the issue and then argue why by presenting your own reasons and evidence to support your thesis statement. Locating Sources for Research. The purpose of the exploratory paper was to explore different writers and their position, their perspective, and the types of evidence they used in order to form your own position and perspective. You have three sources that you may use in your paper. For this paper, you must include a variety of sources; they cannot all come from Web sites. Search SMC’s library online catalog, search for a book, search online databases, find newspaper articles, use the search engine Google scholar at www.google.com, or www.yahoo.com . In addition, observations or experience from your personal life are not allowable. Refer to the following handouts: “Research Guide for Papers,” “Sources Acceptable for Academic Papers.” Both of these handouts are on eCompanion. If you include an article from a Website, there must be a date and a sponsor/publisher. If this is not available you cannot use this source. Thesis Statement and Claim: Does your thesis clearly include a claim? Is it arguable? Does it take a perspective on an issue? Is it narrow and specific enough for the length of this assignment? Is it focused on one subject? Is it a claim of policy where you argue that certainpolicies should be changed? Is it a claim of value where you argue that some action, belief, or policy is morally wrong, good, or bad? Once your claim is clear, you must develop reasons that match and correspond to the type of claim being made. Audience/Point of View: An effective argument is tailored to its audience. The reasons and the types of evidence you offer, the needs and values to which you appeal, terms defined, all depend on your audience and the type of claim. Ask: What does your audience know or not know about your topic? The audience is your instructor and classmates. Never assume that the audience is familiar with your topic or terms. You may need to include definitions and relevant details to help the audience understand your position in the first body paragraph. For this argument essay, you will use only the third-person point of view. No, “I” “We” or “You.” Content/Body Paragraphs. For the length of this assignment, you should have at least three-to-four distinct and relevant reasons to support your thesis. Follow the guidelines for writing the argument paper when developing your reasons. Use the “because” clause approach.

By now, you should have a firm grasp of the existing conversation on your topic after having surveyed the field on your topic so as to narrow the who, what, where, when, and why/how, so that you can fully formulate your own ideas and develop an original complex claim with which to place yourself in the scholarly conversation on your topic. Evaluating your working claim As you draft your working claim, evaluate its efficacy. A strong claim will be: • Contestable: Intentionally writing a claim that someone can disagree with may seem counterintuitive, but consider that if no one could possibly disagree with what you’re arguing, there’s little point in writing about it. Being able to acknowledge and refute counterarguments will strengthen your claim, not weaken it. o POOR: “Durham and Chapel Hill have much in common, although they are different in some ways.” Well, yeah, but who cares? o BETTER: “Although Durham’s industrial past has created a more deeply troubled economic caste system than found in Chapel Hill, it has also created greater cultural diversity that is now helping to guide the city’s economic renewal.” There is certainly room for disagreement in this claim; as a result, it provides a much more interesting basis for discussion. The author is likely to support it more passionately than the first claim. • Reasonable: While you want your claim to be contestable, you also want it to be reasonable. A claim can be radical, in the context of current dialogue on your topic, and still be reasonable if you have sufficient evidence to support it. Readers will recognize the difference between thoughtful, critical interpretations of evidence and contortions that twist evidence around to support an unreasonable claim. • Specific: Broad claims are more difficult to support effectively than focused claims. Specific claims also tend to provide readers with more useful information than broad claims. o POOR: “North Carolina apple farmers are responding to the current economic situation by finding new ways to generate income.” o BETTER: “With hurricanes causing significant crop losses over the past decade, North Carolina apple farmers are increasingly relying on agrotourism to generate reliable supplemental income.” • Significant: Consider the context of the course for which you are writing your paper. Is your claim adding anything meaningful to the current dialogue surrounding your topic? Note that as you become more familiar with the concerns of a given topic or discipline, you will be able to contribute more significantly to the discussion. • Interpretive: Does your claim offer an interpretation of evidence or does it simply describe a situation? If it describes a situation it is a claim of fact. o POOR: “The United States is a federal system that divides governmental powers between national and state authorities.” Rather than offering an interpretation, this sentence describes an incontestable fact. While it may have truth value, it makes a poor th.

Argumentative Essay

Rhoye Villanueva Concepcion

ElementsofPersuasive.pdf

shielamariepineda

Academic research essay

benashane

The Rhetoric of Argument frickewi

LING 281Template Sentences for Paper 1Templates for the au.docx

manningchassidy

LING 281 Template Sentences for Paper 1 Templates for the author’s main claim and reason · The author’s main claim is X. · The author reasons that X, Y, and Z. · The author provides the following reasons for his/her claim: X; Y; and Z. · Two reasons are given in support by the author. First,.…Second,.… Templates for audience discussion · The author’s audience likely consists of… · The readers of the text are probably… · The author appears to write for… · This is evident through the ways the author… · It appears as if the audience is X because Y. · I inferred who the readers of the text likely are from textual clues such as… Templates for the author’s textual organization · The author organizes his article by… · After he does X, he then goes on to do Y. · Next, in paragraphs 4-7, the author… · Finally, in his last section, the author… · Perhaps the author organized his text by in order to . · The reason for this organization is likely because…. A Quote Sandwich Model Model for a “Quote Sandwich” A paragraph that uses a quote, paraphrase, or summary, needs an introduction into the textual support and an explanation why the textual support is relevant to your argument. It can be set up as a sandwich: Example: (from Susie Park, a student of LING 281, Spring 2017) TOP ( At the end of the article, Nelson states, MIDDLE ( “You are Feidin Santana. You are CNN,” BOTTOM ( in order to make a connection to the allusion at the beginning of the article. Ways authors organize information in texts Analysis Break the subject (an object, event, or concept) down into parts and explain the various parts. “Why?” “How?” “So what?” “What if?” What it might mean is, how it relates to what is known, the implications it offers, in other words, my point is, to put it another way, Cause and Effect Explain both events and ideas. The cause is the stimulus or reason for an event or idea. The effect is the result or consequence of the even or idea. So, because, cause, comes from, due to, if, on account of, reasons, since, stems from, accordingly, according to affect, as a result, consequence, consequently, creates, effect, hence, leads to, result, then, therefore, thus Compare and contrast Compare two or more items by describing how they are similar; contrast two or more items by explaining their differences; or, provide both the similarities and the differences for a number of items. Comparison: alike, as well as, both, similarly, likewise, in the same way, analogous to, correspondingly, identical, equivalent Contrast: alternatively, although, but, contrast, conversely, despite, differs from, however, in contrast, less, more, on the contrary, on the other hand, still, unlike, -er suffix (e.g., higher, better, newer) Concession/refutation Offer the opposition’s viewpoint and then tell why it is incorrect/inadequate/unimportant Author states . . .; however, . . . . Author believes . . ., but . . . . Critique Point out both the good and .

Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra1. What does it mean when s.docx

moirarandell

Module 7 Discussion Board Algebra 1. What does it mean when something grows or decays exponentially? How is that different then rising or falling linearly? 2. Give an example of a real life application of exponential growth or decay. Include the link to a website to show this. Please answer as two different posts. You need three posts for full credit. When you reply to others in the class, your replies should contain original thought and/or a follow up question. Classical Argument Persuasion and ArgumentPersuasion is the process of drawing conclusions and getting others to accept them and act upon them.Argumentation is the process of drawing conclusions after looking at both sides of an issue and getting others to accept one side based upon logic and careful exploration of facts. Rhetoric and AudienceRhetoric is the “art of speaking or writing effectively”It is a set of skills used in college and in the business world Effective communication is an important skill in the work forceEffective communication gets our point across without embarrassment for ourselves or others. Effective communication understands what the audience does and does not know about the topic. Aristotle’s Appeals: Ethos, Logos, and PathosAristotle was a student of Plato. Later, he was a teacher for Alexander the Great. He identified three appeals that can be used to persuade others. Ethos=ethics. Logos=logic. Pathos=emotion Ethos=Ethics, CredibilityAs a writer, you will establish your credibility through careful research. Articles from experts in the field of study will help you build your ethos in the paper. An advertisement using ethos would be a McDonald’s commercial stating the number of years in business (hence they know how to make a decent hamburger). A car dealership might also state how long they have been at the same location. Or, the dealership might make sure you know“ 2013 Time Dealer of the year award nominee for being among the nation’s most successful auto dealers who also demonstrate a long-standing commitment to community service” (Fuson Automotive). Logos=LogicWhen using logos in an argument, we provide facts, statistics, evidence, and reason. An automobile commercial stating the vehicle gets x mpg is proving a logos appeal. When gas prices climb, auto makers want to highlight how many miles per gallon the car can travel. Therefore, a car advertised as getting 40 mpg would appeal to a consumer who travels a distance of 40 miles to and from work. If the reader finds the evidence given “logical” it will appeal to the reader. Pathos=EmotionA pathos appeal will tap into human emotions. Some commercials are deliberately funny and are geared to draw us to the restaurant or product being advertised. From about mid-January until February 14, TV ads focus on how we should tell our “significant” other “I love you.” Commercials such as the “Sandals Resort” plays to adults who want a romantic get-away. We are frequently told ...

HBM211-Lecture_9 (1) (1).pptx

JovaniGilam

Directions This may be done table format. APA format is requ.docx

cuddietheresa

Directions: This may be done table format. APA format is required whichever format you choose. A title page, running head, page numbers and three references are required. A. Identify the normal values for each of the following labs. Consider normal values across gender, race, and age, and pregnancy status, when applicable. B. Identify clinical indications for obtaining the following labs. 1. List when indicated for routine screens if applicable (for example,the USPSTF recommends screening for chlamydia in sexually active women age 24 years and younger and in older women who are at increased risk for infection, or TSH screening is indicated for newborns. Indications for screening can also include risk factors. For example, ordering cholesterol levels on a patient with HTN or DM. 2. Besides screening,list 1-3 clinical indications for ordering the lab. For example, clinical indications of WBC include Fever with associated symptoms, weight loss, bone pain with fever, etc. C. Identify conditions associated with abnormal LOW levels of each of the following labs (if applicable) D. Identify conditions associated with abnormal HIGH levels of each of the following labs (if applicable) One good resources for screening recommendations is: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Index/browse-recommendations 1. Components on a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel such as (but not limited to) sodium, chloride, potassium, glucose, CO2, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Calcium 2. Renal Function Tests: Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Creatinine, BUN/Cr Ratio, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) 3. Thyroid Function Tests TSH, Free T4 4. Toxicology Salicylate toxicity, Acetaminophen, Urine Drug Screen, Blood Alcohol, Carbon Monoxide (CO) 5. For your last category of test. Report screening indications for the chosen test, and some clinical indications for ordering them, normal values/results, and S/Sx associated with high/low or abnormal values when applicable a. Mammography On Writing an Ethical Argument Evaluation Paper (PHIL 302) Topic is Racism between social Classes Before you begin writing, it is crucial to pick a subject, topic, or a specific argument that interests you. Your paper will be a critical evaluation of the soundness of an argument. If you already have an argument, then you can go on to the next step. If not, you may choose to discuss one from an author you have read, or you may formulate your own. In some courses, you may consider a case study for your paper. In that case you will formulate an argument that purports to defend a resolution to the case. You should note that it is not crucial that you pick an argument with which you agree. It is about equally difficult (or easy) to write a paper opposing an argument as it is to write one supporting it, so you should probably choose an argument that is interesting first. Your paper will have seven parts: I. Introduction II. Position III. Argument IV. Justification A. V ...

M12 power point understanding the working outline

estarr50

Writing the persuasive essay

Antonis Stergiou

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS IS THE SUBJECT MATTER TO BASE A TH.docx

BHANU281672

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS IS THE SUBJECT MATTER TO BASE A THEROY OR ARGUMENT ON Assignment: The Research Paper Your assignment is to create a 12-page argumentative/persuasive research paper given one of the following options: Option 1. Argue for or against an established theory. Option 2. Argue for or against your own theory. Option 3. Argue for or against a business decision, organizational plan, business philosophy, policy decision, or concept related to the class. The paper should cite approximately eight peer reviewed full text journal articles retrieved from ProQuest, BE & T, InfoTrac, and Academic OneFile. Your paper should integrate at least the following elements: · The presentation of a firm position regarding your stance or theory. · An offering of a strong position using evidence-based argumentation. · An address of opposing points as to present a well-rounded argument controlling personal biases and strengthening your argument while diminishing the opposition’s points. · An effort to use evidence and argument flow as to instill a sense of trust into your reader. Do you feel stuck while planning your argument? If so, then try jumpstarting the assignment by using the following steps: 1. Choose a stance you believe in and write down why you believe in the stance. · Ask yourself the following questions: · Who is my audience and which points will they be interested in? · What kind of tone am I assuming for my argument? · Does my tone match the audience? (If not, consider changing your tone.) · Am I engaging in a fallacy or illogical stance? (Make sure you make sense or no one will believe you!) · Would someone agree or disagree with me given my points? (Argue with yourself as to find the strengths and weaknesses of your stance.) · Am I making a moral or cultural argument? (If so, you may need to reconsider a stance able to utilize scholarly literature.) September 2015 Updated: 3/16/16 California Intercontinental University | 124 of 124 UNIT SIX ASSIGNMENTS · Can I research my stance? (If not, you may need to consider a new stance.) 2. Research as to find the evidence needed to support your stance or theory. Seek the needed facts, quotes, and existing research you can use for your argument 3. Outline and write the essay starting with the evidence-supported defense of your points and slowly transition into an address of opposing points. 4. Provide a brief summary of the argument as to conclude the essay. Paper Requirements The analysis requires the additional components: ÿ One nameless/anonymous or web reference. ÿ Two APA formatted short quotes used to support the paper. ÿ One APA formatted figure that you created that helps support your argument and research findings. ÿ APA formatted paper including: o Font: Times New Roman, 12 point, and double spaced. o Margins: One inch margin ...

Keys to reading academically

Chris Post

Advanced 5 bDaniela Lyra Cardoso

PHI208AssignmentsWeek 5 - Final PaperFinal PaperPlease r.docx

bartholomeocoombs

PHI208 Assignments Week 5 - Final Paper Final Paper Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and re-read them often during and after the writing process to make sure that you are fulfilling all of the instructions. Please also utilize the assignment guidance and the outlined model provided. PHI208: WEEK FIVE ASSIGNMENT GUIDANCE WEEK FIVE ASSIGNMENT GUIDANCE Notes and Advice This paper is a demonstration of what you have learned about moral reasoning based on our examining of ethical theories and specific ethical issues. As such, you should focus your attention on carefully spelling out the reasoning that supports your conclusion, and relating that to the theories we have discussed in class. You are free to write on the same topic and question you wrote on in previous papers or choose a different topic and question. If you choose a different topic, you would benefit from going through the Week One Assignment exercises. For a list of acceptable topics to start with, see the options from the list of topics available in the online course. If you are still unsure of your topic or of how properly to focus it into a relevant ethical question, you are strongly encouraged to consult with your instructor. You are free to draw upon the work you did in previous papers, and reuse parts that you feel were strong, but you are not to simply recycle the previous papers. This paper should reflect the culmination of the development of your thoughts on this issue, and many of the requirements for the final paper cannot be satisfied by a heavily recycled paper . The consideration of an objection against your own view is a way of showing that your view has the support of good reasons and can answer its strongest objections. Therefore, aim at identifying and addressing the strongest opposing argument you can, bearing in mind that a good thesis should be able to respond to the best arguments for the other side. Thesis Statement The thesis statement is more than just a position statement of the sort you provided in the first assignment; rather, it states the position and the primary reasons in such a way that the reader should have a clear sense of how the reasons support the position, which is what will be spelled out and explained in the body of the paper. Please see the handout on thesis statements available in the online course. Checklist This checklist can help you ensure that you have completed all of the assignment instructions. PHI208: WEEK FIVE ASSIGNMENT GUIDANCE Make sure that you ü Provide an introduction that starts with the question, describes the ethical problem (including the most relevant issues), summarizes your procedure in the paper, and concludes with your thesis statement. ü Explain what you think is the best way to reason about this issue, and show as clearly and persuasively as you can how that reasoning supports your position. ü Make reference to at least two.

Topic Social Media makes us lazy.Attach to the paper an out

curranalmeta

Topic: Social Media makes us lazy. Attach to the paper an outline, and here an example for the outline: Toulmin’s Model of Argument How to use this worksheet: Toulmin’s model is an effective tool to help you question your sources and the essential elements of your own argument. Use this worksheet to plan your own argument. Decide on a claim that is supported by the data and the warrants you have discovered through your research. Knowing the elemental structure of your argument is an essential step toward producing an effective argument. Sources: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ List your claim made in the argument (thesis): ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Reasons to support your claim: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Grounds/data to support each reason: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ...

How to use this template To use this template, replace the inst.docx

wellesleyterresa

How to use this template: To use this template, replace the instructions written in italic font with your own discussion text. Be sure to proofread your work and check it for completeness and accuracy. Delete any extra text/instructions/references that do not apply to your post. Then, copy your work and paste it into the discussion window in class.Week 1, Discussion 1: Initial Post My personal communication style is…(Here, you should talk about the “reflect” part of the prompt. You can share your personal verbal style, writing style, and any concerns you have about your ability to develop a truly academic argument in this class.) I have learned that an academic argument is…(Here, you should describe an academic argument in your own words, based upon the items you read in preparation for this discussion. Remember to describe the four basic elements of an argument.) A recent argument that I experienced was…(Or, if you do not wish to outline an argument from your personal experience, describe the argument presented in the sample paper. Be sure to identify the four basic elements of the argument, whether analyzing one from your experience or the student paper.) After reading the course materials, I have questions about…(Be sure to clearly state any questions or confusion you have regarding rhetoric, argument, or styles of argument. Your classmates can help you find the answers throughout the week.) References (If you reference the textbook, instructor guidance, or handout – which you should – be sure to cite them in-text and add the references to the end of your post. We are learning to master APA style in this class and this is a perfect opportunity to begin your practice. Remember: only items cited in-text should be listed as a reference. For more information: https://awc.ashford.edu/cd-in-text-citation-guide.html & https://awc.ashford.edu/cd-apa-reference-models.html) Drown, E., & Sole, K. (2013). Writing college research papers (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Flag Burning. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://cdmsmedia.bridgepointeducation.com/MediaService/MediaService.svc/constellation/book/AUWC.12.4/%7Bhandouts%7Da.8_sample_argument_paper.pdf Garten, A. (n.d.). ENG122 week 1 Instructor guidance [Course materials]. Garten, A., & Wilson, J. (2014). An Introduction to Argument [PDF]. College of Liberal Arts, Ashford University, San Diego, CA. ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument P a g e | 1 English 122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument Argument and Rhetoric An argument can take many forms. An academic argument, at its root, a method for communicating a singular position with evidence, logic, and persuasion. There are essential elements to all valid arguments, though they may take different forms. 1. Claim 2. Evidence 3. Counterargument 4. Rebuttal A successful argument depends upon the delicate balance between these elements. Imagine a teeter-totter at the playground. The ...

AFRICAResearch Paper AssignmentInstructionsOverview.docx

English 1130Paper #4 – 2 PartsPart 1 -- Researched ArgumentP.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to English 1130Paper #4 – 2 PartsPart 1 -- Researched ArgumentP.docx

Similar to English 1130Paper #4 – 2 PartsPart 1 -- Researched ArgumentP.docx (18)

More from SALU18

More from SALU18 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

English 1130Paper #4 – 2 PartsPart 1 -- Researched ArgumentP.docx