This document summarizes a presentation on risk analysis and management. It discusses identifying potential threats and consequences, reducing vulnerabilities, and mitigating consequences through an integrated approach. It also outlines key elements of risk management like risk identification, mitigation, response and reconstruction. Graphs and diagrams show frameworks for analyzing risk, defining risk zones, and the relationship between risk and available resources/options.
Chris Whipple of Environ presents on the risks of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste. He discusses the public's perception of these risk and the best methods to communicate with the public on actual risks.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
David Kosson, Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor of Engineering at Vanderbilt University, gives an overview of various past and present waste management issues, efforts, technologies and impacts. He also presents some challenges regarding waste management.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
Steven Krahn, Professor of the Practice of Nuclear Environmental Engineering in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Vanderbilt University, presents on needs and work in R&D regarding nuclear and chemical engineering.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
Per Peterson, chair of nuclear engineering at UC Berkeley, presents on the United States' nuclear waste policy and gives recommendations on future steps.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
A summary of the discussion that took place at the NuClean Kick-Off Workshop.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
Chris Whipple of Environ presents on the risks of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste. He discusses the public's perception of these risk and the best methods to communicate with the public on actual risks.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
David Kosson, Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor of Engineering at Vanderbilt University, gives an overview of various past and present waste management issues, efforts, technologies and impacts. He also presents some challenges regarding waste management.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
Steven Krahn, Professor of the Practice of Nuclear Environmental Engineering in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Vanderbilt University, presents on needs and work in R&D regarding nuclear and chemical engineering.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
Per Peterson, chair of nuclear engineering at UC Berkeley, presents on the United States' nuclear waste policy and gives recommendations on future steps.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
A summary of the discussion that took place at the NuClean Kick-Off Workshop.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
Enabling citizen choices about land use and the natural environmentAberdeen CES
Best practice in stakeholder participation for environmental management from the Sustainable Uplands and Involved projects. Presented to Scottish Government Advisors, 15th March 2011
The EnergyTech conference series began in 2010 through productive dialog and interaction between technology and systems engineers / professionals within INCOSE, IEEE, and NASA GRC. The 2015 conference addresses the changing dynamics and emerging technologies in Energy, and also deals with some of the most significant, consequential risks and issues in our critical infrastructure, posing major threats to civilized existence.
5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice 24-28 August 2014 in Davos, Switzerland
Water Initiative 2014 Canadian Water Network Research Project OverviewJoel Gehman
The Water Initiative research team is preparing an
extensive comparative, multidisciplinary review of
hydraulic fracturing wastewater handling, treatment,
reuse and disposal by comparing the operating
practices, regulatory policies and stakeholder concerns
that have emerged in various jurisdictions regulating
unconventional shale formations in North America. The
research will identify key knowledge gaps and enable
private and public sector decision-makers to develop
specific research approaches to directly address these
identified knowledge gaps.
Concerns voiced for Darlington Nuclear Plant extension. Concerns of economics and environmental issues and need to review economic risks currently being externalized during the planning process.
Here is what I submitted to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission regarding the Darlington Nuclear power plant. Submitted on October as a formal written comment on October 15 2012.
Peta Ashworth, Group Leader of the Science into Society Group at the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) presented a Global CCS Institute webinar on public awareness and acceptance of CCS.
Effective enforcement of underground storage of carbon dioxide – A presentati...Global CCS Institute
Dr Meredith Gibbs, a leading Australian environmental and climate change lawyer and the Institute’s inaugural Legal Fellow, presented the findings of her research programme on the effective enforcement of the underground storage of carbon dioxide (CO2).
Highlighted as a critical issue for increasing public and industry confidence in CCS, Dr Gibbs’ research has focused upon identifying the key features of an effective enforcement model for the underground storage of CO2 in five national/sub-national regimes in the Asia Pacific region.
Dr Gibbs’ examined the legal regimes of the Australian Commonwealth, the State of Victoria, Japan, Malaysia and China; focusing in particular upon the monitoring and verification (pre-and post-closure) requirements, site closure processes, technical information and data collection requirements, enforcement mechanisms and the allocation of roles and responsibilities for enforcement.
This webinar examined the findings of this research and the final report, which was published on the 8th August, identifying potential barriers to effective enforcement and highlighting opportunities for the improvement of both CCS-specific and existing regulatory models.
Enabling citizen choices about land use and the natural environmentAberdeen CES
Best practice in stakeholder participation for environmental management from the Sustainable Uplands and Involved projects. Presented to Scottish Government Advisors, 15th March 2011
The EnergyTech conference series began in 2010 through productive dialog and interaction between technology and systems engineers / professionals within INCOSE, IEEE, and NASA GRC. The 2015 conference addresses the changing dynamics and emerging technologies in Energy, and also deals with some of the most significant, consequential risks and issues in our critical infrastructure, posing major threats to civilized existence.
5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice 24-28 August 2014 in Davos, Switzerland
Water Initiative 2014 Canadian Water Network Research Project OverviewJoel Gehman
The Water Initiative research team is preparing an
extensive comparative, multidisciplinary review of
hydraulic fracturing wastewater handling, treatment,
reuse and disposal by comparing the operating
practices, regulatory policies and stakeholder concerns
that have emerged in various jurisdictions regulating
unconventional shale formations in North America. The
research will identify key knowledge gaps and enable
private and public sector decision-makers to develop
specific research approaches to directly address these
identified knowledge gaps.
Concerns voiced for Darlington Nuclear Plant extension. Concerns of economics and environmental issues and need to review economic risks currently being externalized during the planning process.
Here is what I submitted to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission regarding the Darlington Nuclear power plant. Submitted on October as a formal written comment on October 15 2012.
Peta Ashworth, Group Leader of the Science into Society Group at the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) presented a Global CCS Institute webinar on public awareness and acceptance of CCS.
Effective enforcement of underground storage of carbon dioxide – A presentati...Global CCS Institute
Dr Meredith Gibbs, a leading Australian environmental and climate change lawyer and the Institute’s inaugural Legal Fellow, presented the findings of her research programme on the effective enforcement of the underground storage of carbon dioxide (CO2).
Highlighted as a critical issue for increasing public and industry confidence in CCS, Dr Gibbs’ research has focused upon identifying the key features of an effective enforcement model for the underground storage of CO2 in five national/sub-national regimes in the Asia Pacific region.
Dr Gibbs’ examined the legal regimes of the Australian Commonwealth, the State of Victoria, Japan, Malaysia and China; focusing in particular upon the monitoring and verification (pre-and post-closure) requirements, site closure processes, technical information and data collection requirements, enforcement mechanisms and the allocation of roles and responsibilities for enforcement.
This webinar examined the findings of this research and the final report, which was published on the 8th August, identifying potential barriers to effective enforcement and highlighting opportunities for the improvement of both CCS-specific and existing regulatory models.
A presentation on Risk Analysis in the Marine Environment for MEOPAR's Annual Training Meeting 2017.
Established in 2012 through Canada's federal Networks of Centres of Excellence Program, the Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response (MEOPAR) Network is a national network of academic researchers and students, government scientists, and partners in the private, NGO and community sectors working together to reduce vulnerability and strengthen opportunity in Canada's marine environment.
Protecting our nation's ports from terrorist attacks consumes significant resources. To help address this problem, researchers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have been developing technologies to make offshore inspection of seaborn trade using floating ports a realistic option. The March 25 webinar will take a look how container commerce can be reinvented through public/private partnerships around Lawrence Livermore technologies and capabilities.
LEARN MORE
Technology Transfer at LLNL: http://1.usa.gov/1fdJd0p
Commerce security from offshore port design: http://bit.ly/1dzwYiv
Plan floated to ship cargo inspection offshore: http://1.usa.gov/1f7flHI
One the most important problem in the chemical, oil&gas or nuclear Industry is the Risk Assessment evaluation. In the theoretical studies, the part of risk analysis is sometimes not considered because the case of study is not real or it hasn't been still industrialized. In the real industry there are different processes for industrializing a product. The HAZOP technique is one example of Risk assessment tecniques. For further information go to: http://www.cholarisk.com/
Protecting our nation's ports from terrorist attacks consumes significant resources. To help address this problem, researchers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have been developing technologies to make offshore inspection of seaborn trade using floating ports a realistic option. The March 25 webinar will take a look how container commerce can be reinvented through public/private partnerships around Lawrence Livermore technologies and capabilities.
LEARN MORE
Technology Transfer at LLNL: http://1.usa.gov/1fdJd0p
Commerce security from offshore port design: http://bit.ly/1dzwYiv
Plan floated to ship cargo inspection offshore: http://1.usa.gov/1f7flHI
Part 4 of 6 - Analysis Phase - Safety Lifecycle Seminar - Emerson Exchange 2010Mike Boudreaux
In San Antonio, Emerson Exchange 2010 featured a new Meet the Experts concept that provides participants to interact with recognized experts on focused topics. Emerson’s Mike Boudreaux provided a 2 hour session on Safety Lifecycle Management. This was an interactive short seminar that has been designed to help business leaders and managers in the process industries have a general understanding of existing industry standards and best practices for safety instrumented systems. This seminar provides a practical overview of the safety lifecycle, including key considerations for each phase. In addition to the typical design concepts related to safety instrumented functions and safety integrity levels, important concepts such as organizational design, competency management, planning, and continuous verification will be discussed.
Part 4 describes the Analysis Phase and explains the managment considerations for hazard and risk assessment, layers of protection analysis, and safety requirements specification.
1
Security Vulnerability
Self-Assessment
Guide for Small
Drinking Water
Systems Serving
Populations Between
3,300 and 10,000
Association of State Drinking Water
Administrators
National Rural Water Association
November 13, 2002
2
This document contains sensitive
information about the security of your
water system. Therefore, it should be
treated as Confidential Information and
should be stored in a secure place at your
water system. A duplicate copy should
also be stored in a secure off-site
location.
Acknowledgments
This document is the result of collaboration among the Association of Drinking Water Administrators
(ASDWA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), the U.S. EPA Drinking Water Academy,
and the National Rural Water Association (NRWA).
3
Contents
SECURITY VULNERABILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE FOR SMALL WATER SYSTEMS ................ 4
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4
How to Use this Self-Assessment Guide ...................................................................................................... 4
Before Starting this Assessment ................................................................................................................... 5
Keep this Document...................................................................................................................................... 5
SECURITY VULNERABILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT ................................................................................... 6
Record of Security Vulnerability Self-Assessment Completion .................................................................... 6
Inventory of Small Water System Critical Components ................................................................................ 7
SECURITY VULNERABILITY SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR SMALL WATER SYSTEMS ............................. 8
General Questions for the Entire Water System........................................................................................... 8
Water Sources ............................................................................................................................................ 11
Treatment Plant and Suppliers ................................................................................................................... 11
Distribution .................................................................................................................................................. 13
Personnel .................................................................................................................................................... 14
Information/Storage/Computers/Controls/Maps.......................................................................................... 15
Publi ...
Similar to (NuClean) Risk and Response Management (20)
Vision 20/20, developed by the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), looks into the not-too-distant future to demonstrate what perfect process safety will look like when it is championed by industry; driven by five tenets of culture, standards, competency, management systems and lessons learned; and enhanced by community passion and global societal themes.
At the 2013 Carbon Management Technology Conference (CMTC13), Tony Butterfield from the University of Utah presented teaching modules on carbon capture designed for high school teachers to help their students understand more about carbon capture (links to modules below). The modules were developed by Alissa Park, Columbia University, is association with the NSF-funded Research Coordination Network on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (RCN-CCUS).
For more information on RCN-CCUS, visit: http://www.aiche.org/ccus-network
Carbon Capture in Water module: http://www.che.utah.edu/outreach/module?p_id=37
Carbon Captured Chalk module: http://www.che.utah.edu/outreach/module?p_id=36
For other K-12 outreach modules from the University of Utah, visit: http://www.che.utah.edu/~tony/OTM/
Beth Beloff, Founder and Principal of Beth Beloff & Associates, introduces the NuClean initiative.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
Marian Naranjo, founder of Honor Our Pueblo Existence (HOPE), gives a Native American perspective on the nuclear waste issue.
The NuClean Kick-Off workshop was held on Nov. 7, 2013 at the Handlery Union Square Hotel in San Francisco, CA, co-located with the AIChE 2013 Annual Meeting.
For more information on NuClean, visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei/conferences/nuclean-workshop/2013.
For more information on AIChE's Center for Energy Initiatives (CEI), visit: http://www.aiche.org/cei.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
(NuClean) Risk and Response Management
1. AIChE Annual Meeting 2013
November 7, 2013
LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX
This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department
of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract
DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC
4. Integrated Approach
Pr
o
Pr tec
ev tio
en n/
tio
n
Threat
Critical Asset
n/
tio se
ga
iti pon
M s
Re
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Consequence
4
LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx
5. KEY ELEMENTS OF RISK MANAGEMENT
Planning and Preparation
Risk
Identification
Mitigation
Risk Transfer
Response and
Reconstruction
Preparedness
Emergency
Response
Rehabilitation
and
Reconstruction
Hazard assessment
(frequency,
magnitude and
location)
Physical/structural
mitigation works
Insurance/ reinsurance of public
infrastructure and
private assets
Early warning
systems.
Communication
systems
Humanitarian
assistance
Rehabilitation/
reconstruction of
damaged critical
infrastructure
Vulnerability
assessment
(population and
assets exposed)
Land-use planning
and building codes
Financial market
instruments
(catastrophe bonds,
weather-indexed
hedge funds)
Contingency
planning (utility
companies/ public
services)
Clean-up, temporary
repairs and
restoration services
Macroeconomic and
budget management
(stabilization,
protection of social
expenditures)
Risk assessment (a
function of hazard
and vulnerability)
Economic incentives
for pro-mitigation
behavior
Privatization of
public services with
safety regulation
(energy, water,
transportation, etc.)
Networks of
emergency
responders (local/
national)
Damage assessment
Revitalization for
affected sectors
(exports, tourism,
agriculture, etc.)
Hazard monitoring
and forecasting
(GIS, mapping, and
scenario building)
Education, training
and awareness about
risks and prevention
Calamity Funds
(national or local
level)
Shelter facilities
Evacuation plans
Mobilization of
recovery resources
(public/ multilateral/
insurance)
Incorporation of
disaster mitigation
components in
reconstruction
activities
Building and Strengthening National Systems for Disaster Prevention and Response: These systems are an integrated, cross-sectoral network of institutions
addressing all the above phases of risk reduction and disaster recovery. Activities that need support are policy and planning, reform of legal and regulatory framework
coordination mechanisms, strengthening of participating institutions, national action plans for mitigation policies and institutional development.
5
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx
6. § Multiple hazards!
• Natural disasters!
• Technological failures!
• Human malevolence!
§ Multiple assets/targets!
• Facilities!
• Extended infrastructures!
• Urban-scapes!
§ Multiple consequences!
• Safety and security!
• Economics!
• Societal integrity!
§ Risk management objectives!
• Save lives and property!
• Effective resource allocations!
• Strategies for protection and response!
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
6
LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx
9. § Establish problem domain, major goals, and organizational
space !
§ Take an inventory of existing capabilities, resources, and
management options !
§ Decision framework: logical relationships of general
management objectives to technical risk!
§ Define management objectives, values and preferences!
§ Determine the risk ʻlandscapeʼ!
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
9
LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx
14. Quantitative dominance of PPV and NPV by
low frequency of hazard occurrence
Insensitive to false positive or false negative rates, the number of
false positives will overwhelm the false negatives
as the frequency of hazard decreases
15. § For low frequency hazards, a large number of false
positives can lead to ʻcomplacencyʼ!
§ For low frequency hazards, false negatives may be rare
and difficult to detect, but consequences can be
extremely severe!
§ When false positives or negatives are found, structured
tests need to be performed to determine their causes!
§ Dominance of false positives over false negatives argues
that trying to get to ʻzero riskʼ is destabilizing: rather, risk
tradeoffs are inevitable!
§ False positive and false negative rates, and frequency of
hazard are initially uncertain: there must be constant
iteration and feedback among the data and these factors!
These issues entail the importance of the interplay and
feedbacks among data and models to manage
uncertainty
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
15
LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx