[SLP webinar week] Challenges and opportunities for the recognition of short ...EADTU
[SLP webinar week] Challenges and opportunities for the recognition of short learning programmes (SLPs) within the European Higher Education Area by Clare Dunn, The OUUK. Day 2, 14 October 2020
E-SLP webinar week: lessons learned from the pilot digital competent educatorsEADTU
E-SLP webinar week: lessons learned from the pilot digital competent educators by Virpi Uotinen, Päivi Kananen, Eva Cendon, Aysun Günes, Magda Zarebski, Glória Bastos (Day 3: 15 October 2020)
Presentation of Svetlana Knyazeva, EDEN Fellow, UNESCO IITE, for the Open Education Week's first day webinar on "Education 2030 – Open knowledge, skills, attitudes and values in Europe and the world" - 4 March 2019
Recordings of the discussion are available: https://eden-online.adobeconnect.com/pdu1u75yqba1/
Despite requirements for constant innovation in Higher Education, the application of
knowledge management constitutes a recent research field in this sector while a wide range of e-learning
tools - like open source learning management systems (LMS) - constitute a basic part of universities
infrastructures at present. As knowledge derived from direct experiences is one of the most important
sources for innovations, this paper presents two approaches for experiential knowledge production in the
Higher Education teaching-learning processes: (1) the managerial production approach and (2) the open
production approach. In accordance with these approaches, the paper also describes how Moodle and Sakai -
two of the most widely used open source LMS - support experiential knowledge production and concludes
that: (1) these LMS don’t have first class constructs to manage experiential knowledge production related
concepts; (2) experiential knowledge related constructs can be represented through existing artifacts included
in these LMS but this approach presents many limitations to support explicit connections between these
constructs and; (3) LMS can extend current capabilities of tags or similar artifacts to represent high level
meaning structures that link content from different LMS tools.
Opening teaching and learning through OER and OEP - presentation at "The Belt and Road' International Community for OER at Open Education Learning week. Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University
The function of microcredentials for the Open UniversityRobert Farrow
This presentation explores the reasons for adopting and developing microcredentials, and whether they currently satisfy those intentions. This draws on the development of microcedentials at the UK Open University and the experience of the European Microcredential Consortium project.
As with many educational technology developments, the hype and rhetoric sometimes outstrips the reality of implementation. MOOCs, learning analytics, artificial intelligence and blockchain have all seen intense periods of projected possible benefits, before settling into a narrower range of actual usage and recognised benefits. Microcredentials are perhaps still in the initial phase of being a development without an evidence base of practical use to support their claims, but some clear intentions from institutions are emerging and initial evidence regarding their take up by learners suggests avenues for their continued deployment.
It should be noted that development of microcredentials is not a zero cost game. They are costly to develop, often requiring different sets of expertise and tools. There is also an associated opportunity cost in developing them, for the time and resource they demand is effort that could be used on other initiatives. So in adopting them, institutions need to be asking two fundamental questions: “Are microcredentials worth this cost?” and “Do microcredentials represent the best way to realise these aims?”
This presentation will explore the answers to these questions, drawing on the experience of the OU in developing a range of microcredentials for the FutureLearn platform and the Erasmus+ EMC project which is examining the adoption of microcredentials for work based learning.
https://i-he2021.exordo.com/programme/presentation/254
Pathways to Learning: Open Collaboration to Support the Online Pivot Robert Farrow
This presentation reports results of a recent open education research collaboration between The African Council for Distance Education and The Open University (UK). Pathways to Learning: new approaches in higher education (OpenLearn, 2020a) hosted two free professional development programmes for university lecturers, instructional designers, professional staff, and managers who share responsibility for providing quality distance and online learning.
• A Teacher Educator programme, Skills for 21st Century Learning and Teaching (OpenLearn, 2020b)
• A Tertiary Educator programme, Take Your Teaching Online (OpenLearn, 2020c)
The courses ran over six weeks between 13th July and 20th August, 2020, and was contextualized by a rapid rollout of online learning during the Coronavirus pandemic. The programmes combined a course of study using OER materials with supplementary activities including a total of 12 webinars and interactive events alongside use of new platforms created by The Open University’s Institute of Educational Technology: nQuire (Herodotou et al., 2018) and Our Journey (Coughlan et al., 2019).
Key findings:
• The pandemic led to a substantial shift in teaching across Africa and a requirement to better understand and gain experience of online learning. Change is likely to persist post-pandemic, although infrastructure and cultural barriers are reported.
• The project surveys, interviews and the data generated through interactions that occurred in the programmes explores challenges and opportunities for online and blended learning across the African continent and globally.
• The evaluation data provides evidence that the programmes led to important understanding of course design and confidence in online facilitation for a large majority of those who took part in them.
• There is evidence that the programmes built confidence, particularly through the experiences of these educators themselves learning online with well-designed materials, and engaging with platforms and experts.
• There is evidence that each of the elements and activities were appreciated by some learners. The open courses were seen as most useful alongside some webinars. Community events and forums added substantial value to these.
• The flexibility offered in the programmes led to different behaviours. Many aimed to complete all the available activities despite time pressures and other barriers. Some were unable to attend live events so recordings were appreciated.
• Given the courses were free to join and many educators faced barriers and pressures, retention figures were very positive with around 66% of those who took part in the first week completing the rest of these programmes.
• Assessment, Open Educational Resources (OER), and understanding of technologies that can be used for online learning and learning design were areas that learners reported as being particularly valuable.
Quality in e-learning - a view for ENQAPaul Bacsich
A view from a benchmarking e-learning perspective of how to initiate a synthesis of approaches to quality in e-learning for use Europe-wide within the ENQA Standards and Guidelines
Internationalisation of HE extended by a Virtual Erasmus Programme (MID2017)EADTU
Internationalisation of HE extended by a Virtual Erasmus Programme by George Ubachs (EADTU) presented during the Maastricht Innovation In Higher Education Days 2017
[SLP webinar week] Challenges and opportunities for the recognition of short ...EADTU
[SLP webinar week] Challenges and opportunities for the recognition of short learning programmes (SLPs) within the European Higher Education Area by Clare Dunn, The OUUK. Day 2, 14 October 2020
E-SLP webinar week: lessons learned from the pilot digital competent educatorsEADTU
E-SLP webinar week: lessons learned from the pilot digital competent educators by Virpi Uotinen, Päivi Kananen, Eva Cendon, Aysun Günes, Magda Zarebski, Glória Bastos (Day 3: 15 October 2020)
Presentation of Svetlana Knyazeva, EDEN Fellow, UNESCO IITE, for the Open Education Week's first day webinar on "Education 2030 – Open knowledge, skills, attitudes and values in Europe and the world" - 4 March 2019
Recordings of the discussion are available: https://eden-online.adobeconnect.com/pdu1u75yqba1/
Despite requirements for constant innovation in Higher Education, the application of
knowledge management constitutes a recent research field in this sector while a wide range of e-learning
tools - like open source learning management systems (LMS) - constitute a basic part of universities
infrastructures at present. As knowledge derived from direct experiences is one of the most important
sources for innovations, this paper presents two approaches for experiential knowledge production in the
Higher Education teaching-learning processes: (1) the managerial production approach and (2) the open
production approach. In accordance with these approaches, the paper also describes how Moodle and Sakai -
two of the most widely used open source LMS - support experiential knowledge production and concludes
that: (1) these LMS don’t have first class constructs to manage experiential knowledge production related
concepts; (2) experiential knowledge related constructs can be represented through existing artifacts included
in these LMS but this approach presents many limitations to support explicit connections between these
constructs and; (3) LMS can extend current capabilities of tags or similar artifacts to represent high level
meaning structures that link content from different LMS tools.
Opening teaching and learning through OER and OEP - presentation at "The Belt and Road' International Community for OER at Open Education Learning week. Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University
The function of microcredentials for the Open UniversityRobert Farrow
This presentation explores the reasons for adopting and developing microcredentials, and whether they currently satisfy those intentions. This draws on the development of microcedentials at the UK Open University and the experience of the European Microcredential Consortium project.
As with many educational technology developments, the hype and rhetoric sometimes outstrips the reality of implementation. MOOCs, learning analytics, artificial intelligence and blockchain have all seen intense periods of projected possible benefits, before settling into a narrower range of actual usage and recognised benefits. Microcredentials are perhaps still in the initial phase of being a development without an evidence base of practical use to support their claims, but some clear intentions from institutions are emerging and initial evidence regarding their take up by learners suggests avenues for their continued deployment.
It should be noted that development of microcredentials is not a zero cost game. They are costly to develop, often requiring different sets of expertise and tools. There is also an associated opportunity cost in developing them, for the time and resource they demand is effort that could be used on other initiatives. So in adopting them, institutions need to be asking two fundamental questions: “Are microcredentials worth this cost?” and “Do microcredentials represent the best way to realise these aims?”
This presentation will explore the answers to these questions, drawing on the experience of the OU in developing a range of microcredentials for the FutureLearn platform and the Erasmus+ EMC project which is examining the adoption of microcredentials for work based learning.
https://i-he2021.exordo.com/programme/presentation/254
Pathways to Learning: Open Collaboration to Support the Online Pivot Robert Farrow
This presentation reports results of a recent open education research collaboration between The African Council for Distance Education and The Open University (UK). Pathways to Learning: new approaches in higher education (OpenLearn, 2020a) hosted two free professional development programmes for university lecturers, instructional designers, professional staff, and managers who share responsibility for providing quality distance and online learning.
• A Teacher Educator programme, Skills for 21st Century Learning and Teaching (OpenLearn, 2020b)
• A Tertiary Educator programme, Take Your Teaching Online (OpenLearn, 2020c)
The courses ran over six weeks between 13th July and 20th August, 2020, and was contextualized by a rapid rollout of online learning during the Coronavirus pandemic. The programmes combined a course of study using OER materials with supplementary activities including a total of 12 webinars and interactive events alongside use of new platforms created by The Open University’s Institute of Educational Technology: nQuire (Herodotou et al., 2018) and Our Journey (Coughlan et al., 2019).
Key findings:
• The pandemic led to a substantial shift in teaching across Africa and a requirement to better understand and gain experience of online learning. Change is likely to persist post-pandemic, although infrastructure and cultural barriers are reported.
• The project surveys, interviews and the data generated through interactions that occurred in the programmes explores challenges and opportunities for online and blended learning across the African continent and globally.
• The evaluation data provides evidence that the programmes led to important understanding of course design and confidence in online facilitation for a large majority of those who took part in them.
• There is evidence that the programmes built confidence, particularly through the experiences of these educators themselves learning online with well-designed materials, and engaging with platforms and experts.
• There is evidence that each of the elements and activities were appreciated by some learners. The open courses were seen as most useful alongside some webinars. Community events and forums added substantial value to these.
• The flexibility offered in the programmes led to different behaviours. Many aimed to complete all the available activities despite time pressures and other barriers. Some were unable to attend live events so recordings were appreciated.
• Given the courses were free to join and many educators faced barriers and pressures, retention figures were very positive with around 66% of those who took part in the first week completing the rest of these programmes.
• Assessment, Open Educational Resources (OER), and understanding of technologies that can be used for online learning and learning design were areas that learners reported as being particularly valuable.
Quality in e-learning - a view for ENQAPaul Bacsich
A view from a benchmarking e-learning perspective of how to initiate a synthesis of approaches to quality in e-learning for use Europe-wide within the ENQA Standards and Guidelines
Internationalisation of HE extended by a Virtual Erasmus Programme (MID2017)EADTU
Internationalisation of HE extended by a Virtual Erasmus Programme by George Ubachs (EADTU) presented during the Maastricht Innovation In Higher Education Days 2017
Researching and Upscaling Virtual Exchange in University EducationSake Jager
Presentation on the Virtual Exchange projects EVOLVE and EVALUATE, given at the EAIE 2018 conference in Geneva by Robert O'Dowd, Sake Jager and Pilar Garces
The European Virtual Seminar on Sustainable Development (MID2017)EADTU
The European Virtual Seminar on Sustainable Development by Joop de Kraker (OUNL) presented during the Maastricht Innovation In Higher Education Days 2017
Overcoming Barriers to Online Engagement through carefull design and delivery...EADTU
Empower Webinar Week. Disclaimer: Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and TrainingAG2 Design
Explore how micro-credentials are transforming Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) with this comprehensive slide deck. Discover what micro-credentials are, their importance in TVET, the advantages they offer, and the insights from industry experts. Additionally, learn about the top software applications available for creating and managing micro-credentials. This presentation also includes valuable resources and a discussion on the future of these specialised certifications.
For more detailed information on delivering micro-credentials in TVET, visit this https://tvettrainer.com/delivering-micro-credentials-in-tvet/
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and Training
[EADTU-EU Summit 2018] Internationalisation of HE extended by a Virtual Erasmus Programme: The “EADTU Mobility Matrix”
1. Internationalisation
of HE extended by a
Virtual Erasmus Programme
The “EADTU Mobility Matrix”
EADTU-EU Summit
17-04-2018
George Ubachs
Managing Director EADTU
George Ubachs 1
2. What does international
networked education bring to HE?
Through collaboration, HEIs can offer their
students:
• high-quality courses with a broader range of
content
• international course offers with extended expertise
• international learning experience
• more flexible programmes
2
3. General Model
Exchange curricula
and courses
Individual
exchange mobility
Networked
curricula and
courses
Networked mobility
Integrated curricula
and courses
Structured or
embedded mobility
International
Learning
Objectives
International
Learning
Outcomes
5. NetCu Handbook
When involved in the design of a new networked
curriculum the following aspects need consideration and
agreement
Design of the contents Shared technological platform
Co-production of contents Language of the learning contents
Management aspects (division of roles) Language of the learning environment
Administrative aspects Accreditation procedure
Financial aspects Mobility of students and professors
Complementarity of content Use of interactive tools for students and profs.
Community QA process
Technological infrastructure Involvement of stakeholders
http://www.networkedcurricula.eu/
6. Virtual mobility
within networked curricula
Create proximity and involvement of potentially all by
• New media, social software, virtual spaces, wiki-like software;
• Increased accessibility, interactivity, flexibility, personalisation,
• Synchronous and asynchronous solutions;
• Multi-campus education;
What is Virtual mobility?
“Virtual Mobility stands for a set of ICT supported activities,
organized at institutional level, that realize or facilitate
international, collaborative experiences in a context of teaching
and/or learning” (Erasmus + programme guide)
VM vs. DE: university-university contracts
Pre-assessed quality and coherent to home university offerings
7. The concept of Virtual Mobility
offers
International experience
• Virtual mobility offers all students the possibility of sampling a course from
another university in another European country in order to learn or to
construct new content in an international setting and to develop
intercultural skills.
Academic enrichment
• Students will have the opportunity to open a window on a different
academic content and approach, comparative view, a different culture,
and to meet students from different countries through virtual forums and
meeting rooms.
7
8. Impact of VE
Personal
Competencies:
• obtain additional skills for international on-line cooperation
anticipating on the new working environment of international
cooperation, communication, exchange of expertise and management
• Contribute to international experience: interact with students and staff
of other cultures and in other languages
• Digital literacy: learn to work with latest educational multi media
• Enrol to several universities of interest
• Specialise and individualise student study portfolios
• More control of study programme by flexible solutions
8
9. Impact of VE
Institutional
• Academic cooperation models between universities: share
staff and expertise
• Sharing courses offers time for research and expertise
building
• Academic enrichment by sharing course programs: extend
academic offerings by more than 1 university
• New forms of university cooperation between traditional
and Open universities: new and more flexible experience of
learning
• Increased flexibilisation and accessibility, attracting new
target groups
9
10. Impact of VE
Policy level: contributing to the EU-policy lines
• Opening up mobility for potentially all students (non-
discriminating)
• Contributing to a more transparent offer of programs with
increased quality by course catalogue
• Not limited in time of studying: Internships combined with
Virtual Mobility or replaced by Virtual Internships
• Time and cost-effective mobility extending current mobility
schemes or new target groups
• “Green mobility”
10
11. Virtual Exchange by EPICS;
building a new mobility scheme in line
with the current Erasmus Programma
In the current Erasmus Programme there are four
key documents that are essential to any exchange:
1. The Course Catalogue
2. Student Application Form
3. Learning Agreement
4. Transcript of Records
5. Institutional agreement (VE additional document)
http://epics-ve.eu/
11
12. Terms and conditions for
Virtual Exchange
The Institutional Agreement lists the courses the institutions have agreed to
accept from another institution as part of their Virtual Exchange mobility
scheme.
Specific terms and conditions referred to in the Virtual Exchange
institutional agreement are listed in 11 paragraphs:
§1 The modules are at least 5 ECTS credits.
§2 Full recognition of the module guaranteed
§3 International collaboration will be integral part
§4 Both institutions as well as the student will sign a Learning Agreement.
§5 The examination of the module will take place in the country in which the
home institution of the Virtual Exchange student is based.
12
13. VE: Terms and conditions
(continued)
§6 Virtual Exchange students who wish to participate in face-to
face activities will have access.
§7 The examination will be done in the original language of the
module or an alternative language
§8 Quality Assurance
§9 Maximum number of students per module
§10 Fee waiver to Virtual Erasmus students.
§11 Staff mobility as part of Virtual Erasmus will include a
physical stay at the partner institution, incorporating a teaching
task.
13
15. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 15
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange
mobility
Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Institutional
agreement
A bilateral institutional
agreement in the case
of individual mobility -
A bilateral or
multilateral agreement
in the case of window
mobility in networked
programs with
alternative mobility
windows (network
agreement) and co-
owned joint programs
(consortium
agreement)
A bilateral institutional
agreement in the case
of individual mobility -
A bilateral or
multilateral agreement
in the case of window
mobility in networked
programs with
alternative mobility
windows (network
agreement) and co-
owned joint programs
(consortium agreement)
Online courses / MOOCs
/ virtual seminars or labs
/ online think tanks, etc.
are retrieved from
universities outside of a
previous institutional
agreement.
However, a learning
agreement is always
requested
Not applicable, one
university organises and
owns the entire
transnational curriculum
Learning
agreement
Yes, a tripartite
learning agreement
guarantees the rights
of the student: all
teaching and learning
activities, interaction
with staff and peers,
assessments, exams,
credits for recognition,
transcript of records.
For double and joint
degrees a common
diploma supplement is
given.
Yes, a tripartite learning
agreement guarantees
the rights of the
student: all teaching and
learning activities,
interaction with staff
and peers, assessments,
exams, credits for
recognition, transcript
of records. For double
and joint degrees a
common diploma
supplement is given.
Yes, a tripartite learning
agreement guarantees
the rights of the
student: all teaching and
learning activities,
interaction with staff
and peers, assessments,
exams, credits for
recognition, transcript
of records
Not applicable, as there is
no exchange. The
university in which the
student is registered
delivers credits, awards,
degrees, which
subsequently can be
recognized when the
student registers at
another university.
Diploma supplement is
given
16. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 16
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange
mobility
Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Objectives
Usually a long term
international academic
experience (at least 15
ECTS)
Immersion
Personal development
Language learning
Intercultural
competencies
A short or long term
international learning
academic experience
through online courses
or other learning
activities
Intercultural
competencies
International digital
communication skills
A short or long term
international academic
experience through
online courses or other
learning activities
Intercultural
competencies
International digital
communication skills
Large scale and flexible
transnational delivery of
degree programs,
continuous education
programs / CPD, single
courses, MOOCs, etc.
17. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 17
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange
mobility
Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Unit of mobility
Curriculum-based, at
least 15 ECTS, except
for specific activities as
intensive programs,
summer schools,
internships, etc.
Individual exchange on
the basis of a course, a
learning activity or a
curriculum found in an
open course catalogue
on the internet;
window mobility ( a
minor, a specialization,
…) according to a
network agreement;
Embedded mobility in
joint programs in
successive stages of the
individual study plans of
students
Individual exchange on
the basis of a courses or
learning activities found
in an open course
catalogue on the
internet;
window mobility ( a
minor, a specialization,
…) found an open
course catalogue;
unlikely in joint
programs as the
approval of all partners
in a consortium has to
be sought
No mobility
Curriculum or course
e.g. degree program,
short (postgraduate)
learning program, single
courses, MOOCs
Course
catalogue
Yes, restricted to
programs/courses in the
institutional, network or
or consortium
agreement
Yes, restricted to
programs/courses in the
institutional, network or
or consortium
agreement
Open course catalogues
or online programs of
other universities.
Students orstaff can
select an online course
or learning activity, e.g.
which is not available in
the home university or
which is an alternative
for a f2f course to be
followed by part-time
Not applicable, courses
are known at
registration. The course
catalogue contains the
courses of the program.
Exchange mobility can
be practiced according
to policies of the
institution, then column
1,2,3 is applicable.
18. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 18
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange
mobility
Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Definition
Physical mobility as
individual (Erasmus)
exchange, window
mobility in networked
programs and individual
study programs with
mobility paths in joint
programs
Exchange by mobility
online, following similar
rules as physical
(Erasmus) exchange,
window mobility in
networked programs
and individual study
programs with mobility
paths in joint programs
or courses
Exchange by mobility
online, same rules as
standard virtual
exchange mobility, but
outside of a previous
institutional agreement.
Courses are found on
open course catalogues
/ programs of other
universities.
Transnational online
distance education
delivers programs or
courses in another
country which is
different from the
country of the provider.
There is no exchange
mobility, except when
foreseen by the
program.
Balance
blended /
online mobility
Online learning
activities can support
physical exchange
In the course of a study
career, both physical
and virtual mobility can
take place
Virtual exchange can be
supported by physical
introduction days/week,
wrap-up days/week at
the end of the
program/course,
depending of the design
or the course or the
program, e.g. in the
case of virtual
seminars/labs,
networked or joint
programs
Online course(s) at a
host university can
include some face to
face activities
Transnational online
distance education
programs can be
blended, e.g. by
introduction weeks, lab
sessions, thesis weeks,
summer or winter
schools, etc.
This is certainly the case
in doctoral programs.
19. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 19
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange
mobility
Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Short term
mobility
Short term mobility only
possible through intensive
programs, summer and
winter schools, etc.
Short term mobility on
the course level is
possible: e.g. an online
course, a virtual seminar,
a virtual lab, learning
games, a MOOC, a
project, a think tank, a
virtual internship….
Short term mobility on
the course level is
possible: e.g. an online
course, a virtual seminar,
a virtual lab, learning
games, a MOOC, a
project, a think tank, a
virtual internship….
No mobility
Networked
curricula
In networked curricula:
students within the
network can choose
alternative windows for
complementary or
specialized course
packages (minors,
research and thesis
work,…)
In networked curricula:
students within the
network can choose
alternative
blended/online windows
with complementary or
specialized course
packages (minors,
research and thesis
work,…)
As there is no
institutional agreement,
there is no networked
curriculum.
Nevertheless, a student
can choose an online
mobility window at
another university
complementary or
specialized course
packages (minors,
research and thesis
work,…)
Networked transnational
online programs can
contain mobility windows,
organised in a university
network, then columns
1,2,3
Joint curricula
In joint programs: an
intensive international
experience with
integration of staff and
students in successive
stages of the curriculum
and related mobility
within the consortium
In joint programs: an
intensive international
experience with
integration of staff and
students in successive
stages of the curriculum
and related mobility
within the consortium
Not applicable Joint transnational online
programs can be jointly
organised by a consortium
of universities with
successive stages.
20. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 20
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange
mobility
Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Accountability
Institutional
agreements and
tripartite learning
agreements guarantee
the institutional
commitment for taking
a number of students
(after selection) and
guarantee the rights of
the student
Institutional agreement
and tripartite learning
agreement guarantee
the institutional
commitment for taking
a number of students
(after selection) and
guarantee the rights of
the student
No institutional
agreement, therefore
universities don’t
guarantee to take a
student (it depends on
number of places
available and on
academic criteria).
Tripartite learning
agreement guarantees
the rights of the student
Student has to check
accreditation and
recognition of credits
for a course or a
program for subsequent
valorisation in other
universities or by
employer
Institutional
decision level
Rector Rector At least dean for
window mobility
Staff level or dean for
single courses,
depending on local
procedures
Not applicable
21. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 21
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange
mobility
Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Registration
In two universities for
individual exchange and
networked or window
mobility-
In two or more
universities when the
student successively
follows parts of the
program (joint
programs)
In principle, the student
can register for
exchange at more than
one university as he can
follow exchange courses
at different universities
without moving to
another place.
All depending on
policies and decisions at
the home curriculum
In two universities for
following a single
course or a minor or
specialization.
Unlikely that a
university allows for a
completely free or open
program
In the institution, which
owns the program
22. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 22
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange
mobility
Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Main challenges Cost to the student,
especially when no
(Erasmus+) grants are
available – mainly travel
and subsistence
Delivering a truly
intercultural experience
for students in a host
university
The limited number of
online and even
blended courses
available in universities.
Therefore, open virtual
mobility is option to be
considered. Online
courses and learning
activities to be found in
open course catalogues
and programs of other
universities.
Methodologies for
examinations to be
considered (EPICs,
TESLA)
Building a community
by designing courses
accordingly – cost of
learning communities
Methodologies for
examinations to be
considered (EPICs,
Tesla)
Scalability of learning
communities and of e-
assessment methods as
well as proctored
exams.
Cost associated with e-
assessments and
proctored exams
Costs to student
dependent on the fees
to be paid (for the
entire course, including
exams)
Building a community
by designing courses
accordingly
Designing and
developing courses and
curricula
Balancing scale, quality
and cost (the iron
triangle)
23. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 23
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange
mobility
Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Main benefits
for students
A student can benefit
from a long international
learning experience
A student can have
alternative courses or
learning activities by
mobility agreements
with other universities
A student can follow a
mobility window at
another university.
A student can benefit of
the strength of a joint
program with integrated
mobility.
The rights of the student
are guaranteed as in the
standard Erasmus
exchange scheme
(learning agreement)
No barriers of place and
cost when a scholarship
or grant is available (e.g.
Erasmus +)
A student can benefit
from a flexible offer of a
short or long
international learning
experience online
A student can have a
alternative course or a
learning activity online by
mobility agreements with
other universities
A student can follow a
mobility window online
at another university.
A student can benefit of
the strength of a joint
program with integrated
mobility which is
(partially) online.
The rights of the student
are guaranteed as in the
standard Erasmus
exchange scheme
(learning agreement)
No barriers of place and
cost
A student can benefit
from a flexible offer of a
short or long
international learning
experience
A student can have a
course or a learning
activity which is not
available at his own
university, neither in
agreed mobility schemes
(outside of institutional
agreements)
The rights of the student
are guaranteed as in the
standard Erasmus
exchange scheme
(learning agreement)
No barriers of place and
cost
Large scale and flexible
delivery of programs and
courses
International online
distance programs give
students worldwide the
opportunity to follow
academic degree
programs, continuous
education programs/CPD
or open
education/MOOCs,
especially those not
available in their own
country
Online distance programs
are flexible, which is
especially important for
students at work and
part-time students
24. EADTU Mobility Matrix
11 april 2018 EADTU Mobility Matrix 24
Physical exchange
mobility
Virtual exchange mobility Open virtual exchange
mobility
Transnational online
distance education
Main benefits
for institutions
Universities offer
additional opportunities
for an international
academic experience by
an immersion in another
university and
culture/language
Universities enrich their
programs, notably in the
case of networked and
joint curricula
Recruitment of
international students for
subsequent programs is
facilitated
Universities increase
internationalization credits
for funding (in some
countries)
Universities offer additional
opportunities for an
international academic and
intercultural experience by
online exchange and joint
learning activities
Universities enrich their
programs, notably in the
case of online components
in networked and joint
curricula, reducing costs to
students
Multi-campus solutions are
very well possible
Universities can easily
organize online
international activities, e.g.
international classrooms,
learning communities,
projects, seminars, think
tanks, etc.
Recruitment of
international students for
subsequent programs as
well as for eventual regular
Erasmus exchange is
facilitated
Host universities and
academic staff increase
their academic visibility
and reputation by the
quality of the learning
activities offered
By the participation of
international students in
learning activities, e.g.
learning communities,
projects, seminars, think
tanks, host universities
can easily organize online
international classrooms,
synchonously or
asynchronously
Recruitment of
international students for
subsequent degree or
continuous education
programs as well as for
eventual regular Erasmus
exchange is facilitated
Recruitment of
international students by
flexible, scalable and high
quality online courses and
programs
Organising open
education, e.g. MOOCs
25. CREATING A VIRTUAL ERASMUS
PROGRAMME
Anticipated future model of a Virtual Erasmus
model: Universities give a fee waiver to the foreign
students, except for study material and receive
funding for their additional costs; it is based on
university – university agreements. A formalised and
fully mainstreamed Virtual Erasmus programme next
to and supporting the physical Erasmus programme.
25