This paper presents the results of a study conducted in Las Vegas, Nevada that quantified water savings from converting typical turf and shrub landscapes to xeriscapes. The study found that xeriscaped homes used 41% less water outdoors after converting at least 500 square feet of turf to xeriscaping. There was little relationship between the area xeriscaped and water savings, but a stronger relationship between pre-conversion irrigation intensity and post-conversion savings. This implies savings came from reducing wasteful irrigation on remaining turf as well as in xeriscaped areas.
Objectives
- Assess types and densities of NA bacteria in diverse manures and manured soils
- Identify physico-chemical conditions that favor NA activity in soil and reduce N2O emissions
- Evaluate the impact of climate adaptive management practices (C addition, low disturbance) on GHG tradeoffs
Objectives
- Assess types and densities of NA bacteria in diverse manures and manured soils
- Identify physico-chemical conditions that favor NA activity in soil and reduce N2O emissions
- Evaluate the impact of climate adaptive management practices (C addition, low disturbance) on GHG tradeoffs
Objectives
- Understand, model and predict greenhouse gases emissions from grasslands and winter wheat croplands under changing microbes, climate, livestock and manure use across the scales of field, farm and watershed
- Broaden STEM education for K-12 and college students and teachers, and engage farmers, ranchers, decision makers, and citizen scientists to participate in in-situ data collection and analyses
Objectives
- Understand, model and predict greenhouse gases emissions from grasslands and winter wheat croplands under changing microbes, climate, livestock and manure use across the scales of field, farm and watershed
- Broaden STEM education for K-12 and college students and teachers, and engage farmers, ranchers, decision makers, and citizen scientists to participate in in-situ data collection and analyses
I gave this short presentation at the TIVIT Next Media planning workshop on Tuesday 17th of May 2011 to outline some ideas on what to focus on when researching Open Data.
This is very much work in progress - ideas and comments are welcomed!
Presentation given at Open Knowledge Festival, Helsinki, Sept 2012. Focuses on benefits to business to publishing open data, and examines business model of OpenCorporates, the largest open database of companies in the world
Watershed management practices and hydrological modelling under changing clim...africa-rising
Poster prepared by B.Z. Birhanu, F.Kizito, K.Traore, O. Cofie and R. Tabo for the Africa RISING Science for Impact Workshop, Dar es Salaam, 17-19 January 2017
II WORKSHOP INTERNACIONAL: GESTÃO SUSTENTÁVEL DE RECURSOS HÍDRICOS NA AGRICULTURA IRRIGADA:
Pesquisa, Políticas Públicas, Extensão Rural e Participação dos Agricultores do Nebraska, USA e do Oeste da Bahia, Brasil
AUDITÓRIO AIBA - BARREIRAS, BA
Land, soil and water management: Watershed management practices and hydrologi...ICRISAT
Improve smallholder agricultural productivity through sustainable intensification by managing water resources using a watershed approach. Studying the seasonal variations of water levels in shallow wells at land scale level, establishing new sets of monitoring stations and field experiments to study the dynamics of water availability and land cover changes, water balance modelling from farm to watershed scale and, regional climate change modelling.
Crop is defined as an “Aggregation of individual plant species grown in a unit area for economic purpose”.
Growth is defined as an “Irreversible increase in size and volume and is the consequence of differentiation and distribution occurring in the plant”.
Simulation is defined as “Reproducing the essence of a system without reproducing the system itself”. In simulation the essential characteristics of the system are reproduced in a model, which is then studied in an abbreviated time scale.
This study explains the use of remote sensing data for spatially distributed hydrological modeling using the MIKE-SHE software used in Tarim River Basin CHINA
Remote sensing based water management from the watershed to the field levelCIMMYT
Remote sensing –Beyond images
Mexico 14-15 December 2013
The workshop was organized by CIMMYT Global Conservation Agriculture Program (GCAP) and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), the Mexican Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food (SAGARPA), the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), CGIAR Research Program on Maize, the Cereal System Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) and the Sustainable Modernization of the Traditional Agriculture (MasAgro)
The Development of a Catchment Management Modelling System for the Googong Re...GavanThomas
A scenario assessment model to assist the end-user in determining priorities for a series of agreed management prescriptions that can be enacted through controls on existing landuse
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
Xeriscape Conversion for Urban Water Conservation - Southern Nevada
1. XERISCAPE CONVERSION FOR URBAN WATER CONSERVATION
W.B. DeOreo, P.W. Mayer, J. Rosales1
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the results from the Southern Nevada Water Authority Xeriscape Conversion
Study (XCS) aimed at quantifying water savings generated through converting typical single
family turf and shrub landscapes to Xeriscape™ . The study was conducted in Las Vegas,
Nevada using 50 home samples from both Xeriscape and Turf homes. Water use data from the
periods before and after implementation of XCS were used in conjunction with specific end use
data collected from all homes during the summer of 1998 to evaluate the impacts of the
Xeriscape study.
During the baseline year (1995) the average outdoor water use patterns in the Turf and Xeriscape
groups were similar, but not identical: 193 kgal for the Turf group and 166 kgal for the Xeriscape
group. During the post Xeriscape year (1997) while the outdoor use of the Turf group increased
slightly (from 193 to 195 kgal) the outdoor use of the Xeriscape group declined significantly
(from 166 kgal to 100 kgal). The reduction in outdoor use among participants in the Xeriscape
Conversion Study amounted to a decrease of 66 kgal (41%) in outdoor water use.
The average net ET for turf grass in Las Vegas is 83 inches per year, which is equivalent to 50
gallons per square foot (gal/sf). During the baseline year the average application of both groups
was 49 gal/sf of irrigated landscape. In the year following the conversion the Xeriscape group
applied less water to both turf and Xeriscape areas. They applied approximately 85% of ET to
turf and 40% of ET to Xeriscape areas. The combination of these rates yielded the 41% overall
savings in water use measured for the group. There was surprisingly little relationship found
between the area Xeriscaped and the water savings, but there was a stronger relationship between
the intensity of the irrigation at each home during the baseline year and the savings achieved by
the Xeriscape conversion. This implies that a significant portion of the savings observed in this
study derived from elimination of wasteful irrigation on the remaining turf areas as well as the
reduced water use in Xeriscape areas. Continuing studies are underway to determine if these
savings are permanent, or if they will decrease with time.
BACKGROUND
In 1996 the Southern Nevada Water Authority, in co-operation with the US Bureau of
Reclamation began a three year study of the effects of Xeriscape on residential water use. This
project was called the Southern Nevada Xeriscape Conversion Study (XCS). The aim of the
XCS is to provide detailed comparisons of water use between a group of 499 Xeriscape
conversion homes (the Xeriscape group) and 253 traditionally landscaped homes (the Turf
group). To participate in the study, each conversion home agreed to convert at least 500 sf of
turf to Xeriscape. The XCS is an ongoing study with a projected completion date in 2001.
All 752 homes in the study will be analyzed using monthly data from the mian water meters and
separate sub-meters on their irrigation systems. At the start of 1997 it was decided to obtain
more detailed information on water use from a sample of homes using portable data loggers and
1
2. flow trace analysis. The data loggers were to provide flow trace data, which could be used to
identify individual water use events, including both interior fixture and appliance use, and
operation of individual irrigation zone valves. Data of this type was then used to determine
indoor use, turf irrigation and Xeriscape irrigation at each home. The data logger study was
designed to provide an independent investigation of the Xeriscape water savings, and to
demonstrate a way of assessing the impacts of the Xeriscape conversion without relying on sub-
meters.
WHAT IS XERISCAPE?
The term Xeriscape comes from a combination of the Greek word “xeros” meaning dry and the
English word landscape. Pronounced (zeer’ scape) the word Xeriscape was coined in 1982 by
i’
Nancy Leavitt, an environmental planner for Denver Water and then trademarked by Denver
Water later in the 1980s. Xeriscape is a systematic concept for saving water in landscaped areas
and refers to an entire system of landscaping which seeks to maximize both the beauty and water
efficiency of urban landscaping through application of a set of design principals. The seven
primary principles of Xeriscape are:
1. Appropriate planning and design
2. Limiting turf areas
3. Efficient irrigation systems
4. Improve the soil
5. Use of mulches, where appropriate
6. Use of drought tolerant plants in three distinct zones – natural, drought tolerant, and oasis zones
7. Appropriate and timely maintenance
Since the popularizing of the seven principles of Xeriscape in 1982, low-water use landscaping
programs have been started in more than 40 states and numerous foreign countries. While a
large number of Xeriscape demonstration projects have been documented until 1997, few
systematic Xeriscape conversion studies have been undertaken. Only a few studies have
documented the conservation effectiveness of these landscape programs, these include Nelson
and Kruta (1994), and Gregg et. al. (1994).
METHODOLOGY
Study Group Selection
The Xeriscape group was selected from the population of 102 homes which participated in the
XCS in 1996 and early 1997. These 102 homes were selected because each had a full year of
water consumption data available after the conversion. The 50 homes chosen to participate in
the study were selected at random. The Turf group was randomly selected from approximately
253 accounts which agreed to participate in the ongoing monitoring program as part of the XCS,
but did not convert any portion of their landscape to Xeriscape.
The homes selected for logging from the Xeriscape group had converted an average of 1504
square feet of their landscape from traditional turf grass to Xeriscape landscape. This
represented an average of 47% of their irrigable area. Figure 1 shows a distribution diagram of
the percentages of the irrigable areas on each lot that were converted as part of the project.
Because the selection process involved use of volunteers this study can not be considered a truly
scientific assessment of the impacts of Xeriscape for the general population, but the results
should be indicative of the water savings achievable from this water conservation technique.
The methodology devised for this study sought to obtain the best possible estimates of the
savings through paired comparisons of the same two groups before and after the Xeriscape
intervention.
4. Figure 2 shows a combination of turf and xeriscape irrigation in a six hour view. The first two
turf irrigation events are the same four zone irrigation system set to run twice consecutively. The
Xeriscape irrigation, which follows, is a two zone system which continues for nearly four hours.
The analysis was simplified by knowing how the clocks were programmed and which zones
were turf and which were Xeriscape, which information was obtained as part of the field
verification process.
Figure 2: Turf irrigation and Xeriscape irrigation and misc. toilets and faucets
The result of the flow trace analysis provided average daily indoor use for each house broken
down in to toilets, shower, dishwasher, clothes washer use etc, and daily outdoor use for turf and
Xeriscape irrigation over the logging period. The indoor use was assumed to remain constant
over the course of the year, which other studies have shown to be true (Mayer and DeOreo
1999). The outdoor use was used only to compare application rates during the logging period,
since this varies significantly over the year. Knowing indoor use accurately, however, allowed
outdoor use to be calculated from the billing data by subtraction.
RESULTS
Table 1 shows that in 1995 the outdoor use of the Turf Group averaged 193 kgal. and in 1997 the
Turf group increased their average annual outdoor use by 2,000 gallons to 195 kgal. We know
from the customer information data collected by the Authority the average irrigable area on the
Turf group lots averaged 3731 sf . This implies that the Turf application rate of the Turf group
averaged 52 gallons per square foot (gpsf) in 1995.
Table 1: Turf group outdoor water use in 1995 and 1997, t-test results
1995 Baseline Year 1997 Post Xeriscape
Mean annual use (kgal.) 193 195
Sample size/observations 49 49
Hypothesized mean difference 0
Degrees of freedom 48
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.73
Table 2 shows the outdoor use for the Xeriscape group during 1995 and 1997. In 1995 the
Xeriscape group used 166 kgal for outdoor purposes while in 1997, after the conversion of
significant portions of each homes’ landscape to Xeriscape, their average outdoor use decreased
by 66 kgal to 100 kgal. The average irrigable area on the Xeriscape lots was 3631 square feet, so
the application rate of the Xeriscape group was 46 gallons per square foot during the baseline
year, and 28 gallons per square foot after the conversion.
5. Table 2: Xeriscape group outdoor water use in 1995 and 1997, t-test results
1995 Baseline Year 1997 Post Xeriscape
Mean annual use (kgal.) 166 100
Sample size/observations 47 47
Hypothesized mean difference 0
Degrees of freedom 46
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.0000
Figure 3 shows distribution diagrams of the outdoor use of the Xeriscape group before and after
the conversion. The dark line shows the baseline distribution while the light line shows the
distribution after the Xeriscape project (1997). The change in the average use is -66 kgal per
year.
Outdoor Use Distributions 1995 and 1997
Xeriscape Group
45%
40%
35%
Relative Frequency
30%
1995 Baseline
25%
1997 Post-
20% Xeriscape
15%
10% 66 kgal.
5%
0%
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Outdoor Use (kgal.)
Figure 3: Outdoor use distributions, Xeriscape group
An intriguing aspect of this study was the almost total lack of correlation between reduction in
water use and percent conversion to Xeriscape. If the water savings were due to a strictly
mechanical switch from high to low water use plant material then there should have been a
strong correlation between the percent of the landscape converted and the savings. As shown in
Figure 4 this did not occur. Clearly, there were other factors involved with the reduction in
water use observed in this group. An indication of one of these factors is shown in Figure 5,
which shows that there is a clear correlation between the amount of water saved and the degree
to which the customers were over-irrigating their landscapes in the baseline year. Those
customers who were farthers above the ET line (shown as a vertical line at 82” in Figure 5)
showed the largest savings, while the customers who were applying at or below the ET line
showed less savings.
6. Percent Converted to Xeriscape vs. Water Reduction
Regression Analysis
100%
y = 0.0608x + 0.383
R2 = 0.0029
80%
Percent Outdoor Water Reduction
60%
40%
20%
0%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
-20%
Percent of Irrigable Area Converted to Xeriscape
Figure 4: Reduction in outdoor use vs percent conversion to Xeriscape
Savings vs. Previous Water Use
Regression Analysis
200
Xeriscape Water Savings (kgal)
150
100
50
y = 0.4234x + 27.294
2
R = 0.2864
0
Average Turf ET=82.6"
-50
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Irrigation Application in 1995 (inches)
Figure 5: Water savings vs. Pre-Xeriscape application rate
CONCLUSIONS
1. In this group of single family customers, who converted an average of 1500 sf of turf
landscape to low water use Xeriscape, a significant reduction in outdoor water use was
observed. Outdoor use declined from 166 to 100 kgal between the baseline and post
conversion year. This is a 41 reduction in total outdoor use. During the same period of time
the outdoor use of the turf group remained unchanged.
2. The water savings associated with the Xeriscape conversion program appear to derive from
both the low water demand of the Xeriscape and the fact that the customers appear to reduce
the amount of over-irrigation of their standard landscapes as well.
3. On average the single family customers in both the Xeriscape and Turf groups were irrigating
at the net ET level prior to the intervention. Their average application was 49 gal/sf,
compared to the net ET of 50 gal/sf.
4. There is a wide distribution in the use patterns, and some customers use far less than 50 gal/sf
7. participating in the project the best results came from the largest users, and these would be
the best group to target.
5. Since we know that a significant amount of the savings were due to changes in irrigation
practice induced through participation in the project, it is of great interest to track the water
use over time to determine the extent to which the savings decline as people either revert to
their old habits.
6. As the plants in the Xeriscape areas mature (and grow) their water requirements would be
expected to increase as well. Tracking applications to the Xeriscape areas will shed light on
how water use increases due to plant growth.