© Copyright 2014 Axis Technology, LLC
Big Data and the Semantic Web
Data Challenges
• Financial Firms Face Complex Data Challenges



Fast Changing Regulations with strict deadlines
Complicated Financial Instruments
Data Silos
 High Data Redundancy
Reconciliations Between Front-Middle-Back Office
Expensive Infrastructure Cost


• Traditional Methods Have Been Proven Expensive
 Based on the assumption that Data needs to be Modeled before being consumed
 Lack Of Agility
 Expensive to Modify
Created Proliferation of Data Marts and Data Warehouses with Large ongoing cost
Created the “Painting the Golden Gate Bridge” Syndrome


10© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
BIG Data
• Introduced to describe the management of terabites of data
 Introduced by Google and Yahoo, adopted by Facebook, Twitter, Amazon
 Hadoop, Lucene , MapReduce, MapR, NoSQL, Cassandra, Pig, HDFS, HBase
 Enable The Management of Unstructured or Semi-Structured Data
 Human readable and traditionally hard to be processed by machine
 Introduced the “Google Experience”
• Big Data applications could enable financial firms to:




Increase Insight into Risk
Reduce processing Cost
Meet Strict Regulatory Deadline
Increase Agility in Data Management
• The benefits can generate billions of dollars in increased revenues and reduced costs
11© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
The Solution
• Extend the Big Data approach to structured data
• Create an Agile Data Management environment
• Extend the Google experience to Corporate Data
• Introduce Web 3.0 concept of Ontology and RDFs to Corporate Data
 new method for accessing, combining, using and sharing data from
disparate information sources, regardless of variations in underlying data
structures
• Partnership with vendors in the Semantic Web technology space
 Fit Solution to Client Requirements
12© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
The Business Value
• Combine Structured and Un-Structured Data
• Non Technical Users Can Access Any Data Any Time Regardless of Its Location
 After an Initial Investment of creating or mapping existing ontology (Ex: FIBO) to internal
Corporate Data
• Users Ask For What They Want In Familiar Terms
 No Complex SQL
• Better Time To Market And Development and Support Cost Savings


Avoid the tedious and time consuming of examining all use cases to create a Data Model
2:1 Ratio Saving In Development Cost, even more for support on going cost
• Flexibility
 Can be incrementally deployed and extended, showing value as you go
13© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
The Approach
• Phase I: Introduction to a Client - Free Seminar


2 hrs Presentation
½ hour Product Demo
• Phase II: Quick Pilot - 5 Days (Free )


Gather Real Data from Client (static)
Create Customized Demo
• Phase III: POC - 8 weeks (Cost depends on # of people assigned)


POC will be a limited version of the actual production system
Could be productionized
• Phase IV: Final Engagement (Fixed Cost TBD)
 Shared the implementation Risk
14© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
Traditional vs. Semantic
15© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
Traditional Approach
16© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
Semantic Approach
17© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
Examples of Initial Investment Cost
18© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
Examples of BAU Cost - 3 years
19© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
Examples of 3 Years TCO Analysis
20© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
www.axistechnologyllc.com
70 Federal Street
Boston, MA 02110
(857) 445-0110
7© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC

Big Data and the Semantic Web

  • 1.
    © Copyright 2014Axis Technology, LLC Big Data and the Semantic Web
  • 2.
    Data Challenges • FinancialFirms Face Complex Data Challenges    Fast Changing Regulations with strict deadlines Complicated Financial Instruments Data Silos  High Data Redundancy Reconciliations Between Front-Middle-Back Office Expensive Infrastructure Cost   • Traditional Methods Have Been Proven Expensive  Based on the assumption that Data needs to be Modeled before being consumed  Lack Of Agility  Expensive to Modify Created Proliferation of Data Marts and Data Warehouses with Large ongoing cost Created the “Painting the Golden Gate Bridge” Syndrome   10© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 3.
    BIG Data • Introducedto describe the management of terabites of data  Introduced by Google and Yahoo, adopted by Facebook, Twitter, Amazon  Hadoop, Lucene , MapReduce, MapR, NoSQL, Cassandra, Pig, HDFS, HBase  Enable The Management of Unstructured or Semi-Structured Data  Human readable and traditionally hard to be processed by machine  Introduced the “Google Experience” • Big Data applications could enable financial firms to:     Increase Insight into Risk Reduce processing Cost Meet Strict Regulatory Deadline Increase Agility in Data Management • The benefits can generate billions of dollars in increased revenues and reduced costs 11© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 4.
    The Solution • Extendthe Big Data approach to structured data • Create an Agile Data Management environment • Extend the Google experience to Corporate Data • Introduce Web 3.0 concept of Ontology and RDFs to Corporate Data  new method for accessing, combining, using and sharing data from disparate information sources, regardless of variations in underlying data structures • Partnership with vendors in the Semantic Web technology space  Fit Solution to Client Requirements 12© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 5.
    The Business Value •Combine Structured and Un-Structured Data • Non Technical Users Can Access Any Data Any Time Regardless of Its Location  After an Initial Investment of creating or mapping existing ontology (Ex: FIBO) to internal Corporate Data • Users Ask For What They Want In Familiar Terms  No Complex SQL • Better Time To Market And Development and Support Cost Savings   Avoid the tedious and time consuming of examining all use cases to create a Data Model 2:1 Ratio Saving In Development Cost, even more for support on going cost • Flexibility  Can be incrementally deployed and extended, showing value as you go 13© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 6.
    The Approach • PhaseI: Introduction to a Client - Free Seminar   2 hrs Presentation ½ hour Product Demo • Phase II: Quick Pilot - 5 Days (Free )   Gather Real Data from Client (static) Create Customized Demo • Phase III: POC - 8 weeks (Cost depends on # of people assigned)   POC will be a limited version of the actual production system Could be productionized • Phase IV: Final Engagement (Fixed Cost TBD)  Shared the implementation Risk 14© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 7.
    Traditional vs. Semantic 15©Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 8.
    Traditional Approach 16© Copyright2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 9.
    Semantic Approach 17© Copyright2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 10.
    Examples of InitialInvestment Cost 18© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 11.
    Examples of BAUCost - 3 years 19© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 12.
    Examples of 3Years TCO Analysis 20© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC
  • 13.
    www.axistechnologyllc.com 70 Federal Street Boston,MA 02110 (857) 445-0110 7© Copyright 2012 Axis Technology, LLC