The document provides an overview of the Capital Works Management Framework (CWMF), which consists of four pillars that establish best practices for public sector construction projects in Ireland. It summarizes the key components of Pillars 3 and 4, including the introduction of a Project Coordinator role, the new Project Execution Plan, an emphasis on risk and value management, and a series of project reviews. The framework aims to achieve greater cost certainty, value for money and efficient delivery through standardized contracts, engagement conditions, cost planning templates and extensive guidance covering the project lifecycle.
The Groundwater Reduction Plan Program Monthly Progress Report summarizes activities in February 2012 related to planning, scheduling, procurement, cost reporting, and quality assurance for the Groundwater Reduction Plan Program. Engineering and construction were ongoing. Procurements included solicitations, contract awards, and procedures. Cost reports provided budget and financial details. Quality assurance efforts ensured specifications were met. Various meetings were also held to discuss ongoing work.
This document discusses implementing an in-house earned value management (EVM) solution at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). It acknowledges support received and outlines topics to be discussed, including what EVM is, why it is important, roles and responsibilities, and NASA's EVM pilots. It summarizes accomplishments from the initial EVM testbed phase at GSFC, such as identifying required hardware, software, and system interfaces to support EVM. The overall goal is to establish a certified EVM system at GSFC by fiscal year 2010.
The document discusses scheduling a project at different levels. It describes the FSBOK Guide's 5-level schedule hierarchy from Level 1 executive schedules down to Level 5 look-ahead schedules. Key points include maintaining Level 1 and 2 schedules as time-scaled networks, limiting rolling wave planning to Level 4, and keeping uniform activity duration ranges within each schedule level. Network-based schedules are advocated for reliability in forecasting and evaluating delays. Massive schedules with high density can degrade usefulness, so alternative approaches like multi-level scheduling are suggested.
The document discusses integrated testing plans for the Constellation program at KSC. It describes plans to conduct Multi-Element Integrated Tests (MEITs) to test interactions between Constellation flight elements launched on different vehicles before they are integrated in space. MEITs found significant problems in previous programs that could have impacted safety and mission objectives. The tests are intended to reduce risks by identifying issues early.
This document discusses EVMS certification and provides an overview of earned value management. It contains the following key points:
1) The objectives are to provide perspective on the EVMS certification challenge and identify areas of focus to position an organization for successful certification.
2) EVMS certification evaluates an organization's compliance with 32 ANSI guidelines across stakeholders, processes, baseline development, status and forecasting, metrics and reports, management, and corrective action.
3) Successful certification depends on having a documented EVMS that meets all guidelines, projects executing the documented system, and an adequate surveillance plan to ensure sustainability.
The document discusses terminology and relationships related to managing project reserves, including risk posture, scope margin, and de-scoping plans. It provides a high-level flow for establishing scope margin, beginning with establishing level 1 requirements and defining descope options. The progression to Key Decision Point C is shown, including establishing baseline requirements and success criteria, and refining requirements and updating risk/reserve posture. Budget and reserve estimates are also discussed, including the progression from pre-phase A through phase B and to KDP-C, as well as different types of reserve calculations.
The document describes NASA's Baseline Performance Review (BPR) process. The BPR provides NASA senior leadership with objective information on the performance of NASA programs, projects, and operations relative to their baseline plans. It aims to identify performance trends, issues, and risks. The BPR involves monthly reporting from Mission Directorates and support offices. Independent assessors evaluate performance metrics. The BPR process helps improve communication, identify cross-cutting issues, and inform decision-making.
The document provides an overview of the requirements and processes needed to successfully pass Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and Key Decision Point C (KDP C) under NASA Procedural Requirements 7120.5D. It first discusses categorizing a project based on cost and complexity to determine the appropriate decision authority and governing documents. It then outlines the phases of formulation and implementation in the project lifecycle and the major reviews and decision gates including PDR, which provides approval to proceed to implementation phases. Examples from the Juno project are given to demonstrate how to address the requirements to have a successful PDR while still accomplishing the primary work.
The Groundwater Reduction Plan Program Monthly Progress Report summarizes activities in February 2012 related to planning, scheduling, procurement, cost reporting, and quality assurance for the Groundwater Reduction Plan Program. Engineering and construction were ongoing. Procurements included solicitations, contract awards, and procedures. Cost reports provided budget and financial details. Quality assurance efforts ensured specifications were met. Various meetings were also held to discuss ongoing work.
This document discusses implementing an in-house earned value management (EVM) solution at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). It acknowledges support received and outlines topics to be discussed, including what EVM is, why it is important, roles and responsibilities, and NASA's EVM pilots. It summarizes accomplishments from the initial EVM testbed phase at GSFC, such as identifying required hardware, software, and system interfaces to support EVM. The overall goal is to establish a certified EVM system at GSFC by fiscal year 2010.
The document discusses scheduling a project at different levels. It describes the FSBOK Guide's 5-level schedule hierarchy from Level 1 executive schedules down to Level 5 look-ahead schedules. Key points include maintaining Level 1 and 2 schedules as time-scaled networks, limiting rolling wave planning to Level 4, and keeping uniform activity duration ranges within each schedule level. Network-based schedules are advocated for reliability in forecasting and evaluating delays. Massive schedules with high density can degrade usefulness, so alternative approaches like multi-level scheduling are suggested.
The document discusses integrated testing plans for the Constellation program at KSC. It describes plans to conduct Multi-Element Integrated Tests (MEITs) to test interactions between Constellation flight elements launched on different vehicles before they are integrated in space. MEITs found significant problems in previous programs that could have impacted safety and mission objectives. The tests are intended to reduce risks by identifying issues early.
This document discusses EVMS certification and provides an overview of earned value management. It contains the following key points:
1) The objectives are to provide perspective on the EVMS certification challenge and identify areas of focus to position an organization for successful certification.
2) EVMS certification evaluates an organization's compliance with 32 ANSI guidelines across stakeholders, processes, baseline development, status and forecasting, metrics and reports, management, and corrective action.
3) Successful certification depends on having a documented EVMS that meets all guidelines, projects executing the documented system, and an adequate surveillance plan to ensure sustainability.
The document discusses terminology and relationships related to managing project reserves, including risk posture, scope margin, and de-scoping plans. It provides a high-level flow for establishing scope margin, beginning with establishing level 1 requirements and defining descope options. The progression to Key Decision Point C is shown, including establishing baseline requirements and success criteria, and refining requirements and updating risk/reserve posture. Budget and reserve estimates are also discussed, including the progression from pre-phase A through phase B and to KDP-C, as well as different types of reserve calculations.
The document describes NASA's Baseline Performance Review (BPR) process. The BPR provides NASA senior leadership with objective information on the performance of NASA programs, projects, and operations relative to their baseline plans. It aims to identify performance trends, issues, and risks. The BPR involves monthly reporting from Mission Directorates and support offices. Independent assessors evaluate performance metrics. The BPR process helps improve communication, identify cross-cutting issues, and inform decision-making.
The document provides an overview of the requirements and processes needed to successfully pass Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and Key Decision Point C (KDP C) under NASA Procedural Requirements 7120.5D. It first discusses categorizing a project based on cost and complexity to determine the appropriate decision authority and governing documents. It then outlines the phases of formulation and implementation in the project lifecycle and the major reviews and decision gates including PDR, which provides approval to proceed to implementation phases. Examples from the Juno project are given to demonstrate how to address the requirements to have a successful PDR while still accomplishing the primary work.
The document describes the Orion project's plans to streamline the Critical Design Review (CDR) process compared to the previous Preliminary Design Review (PDR). Key aspects of the streamlined CDR include dividing design documentation reviews into focused subgroups, improving the quality and efficiency of identifying and resolving issues through the review process, and reducing the overall number of participants. The goal is to make the CDR process more effective while reducing costs to about one-third of the PDR costs.
The document discusses the Next Generation Controlling project at Deutsche Post World Net. The project aims to transform the company's Controlling organization into an "Advanced Navigator" that better supports management. Phase 1 involved a thorough analysis of the current performance of Controlling through interviews and a survey. While Controlling has adapted successfully to changes, the analysis found room for improvement. Phase 2 will implement the IMPACT program using 11 initiatives to address opportunities identified across 6 levels, including Controlling's mission, key processes, systems, and organization. The goal is to clearly improve efficiency and effectiveness.
The Environmental Responsible Aviation (ERA) Project aims to select promising aircraft concepts and technologies by 2025 to simultaneously reduce fuel burn, noise, and emissions. Technologies will be matured from TRL 3 to 5/6 through integrated systems research. Risk management is challenging due to the technical nature of technology development projects and independent sub-projects. ERA's risk management process developed a contribution factor based on expert input to assess each technology's potential to meet ERA goals, which improves identification of risks to project success compared to traditional approaches.
The document provides an overview of the changes between the third and fourth editions of PMI's Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Some of the key changes include combining or renaming processes, expanding the triple constraints to include quality, resources and risk, adding new appendices, and aligning the PMBOK Guide with other PMI standards. The fourth edition will replace the third edition as the reference for PMI credential exams, though only a small percentage of exam questions are expected to need updates. The credential exams will be updated on a rolling schedule between June and August 2009.
The document discusses Imperial College Consultants' role in managing projects funded by the European Union's FP7 framework. ICON acts as a consortium manager, coordinating non-research activities like budgeting, reporting, dissemination, and intellectual property planning. As the manager, ICON recruits staff, organizes meetings, communicates between partners, handles finances, and sets up websites and document sharing systems. The document outlines ICON's involvement from the proposal through execution phases of FP7 projects and notes some best practices and lessons learned for effective consortium management.
This document provides an overview of project scheduling from NASA's perspective. It discusses NASA's large, complex projects and the requirements for project scheduling. The presentation covers key project scheduling processes including activity definition, sequencing, duration estimating, schedule development, status accounting, and performance reporting. It provides examples and definitions for these processes. The goal is to give attendees a basic understanding of project scheduling as it relates to NASA projects.
This document discusses the types of cost and schedule reports that NASA is required to submit to oversight bodies like Congress, OMB, and GAO. It outlines three main types of reports: [1] Baseline Reports that establish cost and schedule commitments, [2] Current Estimate Reports that provide updates, and [3] Threshold Reports required when growth thresholds are exceeded. It provides details on the timing, recipients, and required contents of each report. The document is intended to explain NASA's external reporting processes and requirements to project managers.
The document provides an overview of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Project from a project management perspective. It discusses the GPM mission objectives of improving understanding of the global water cycle and precipitation forecasts. It describes the GPM observatory and spacecraft, including instruments and ground assets. It also summarizes the project management approach, including the use of an integrated master schedule, earned value management, and joint confidence level analysis to manage schedule and costs.
Project termination can occur for various reasons such as technical or financial failure, changes in needs or priorities, or budget constraints. When a project is terminated, it impacts individuals and the organization. A terminated project requires closure while minimizing trauma through open communication. Methods of project termination include removing resources, integrating the project, or squeezing the budget. Examples of terminated NASA projects include Apollo missions 18-20 and programs such as X-33 due to cost and technical issues.
This document provides an outline for a presentation on achieving IT project success using NASA standards 7120 and 7123. It discusses key project elements like lifecycles, work breakdown structures, work products, stakeholder outreach, timelines, and an example NASA project. The outline also describes work products generated at different phases for project management, system engineering, subsystems, integration and validation, and deployment/operations. A table shows time-phased work products mapped to project phases and key decision points.
The document presents a strategy proposed by NASA's AR&D Community of Practice to address NASA's history of developing autonomous and automated rendezvous and docking (AR&D) capabilities for individual programs rather than taking an integrated agency approach. The strategy calls for developing an "AR&D Warehouse" - a library of reusable AR&D hardware and software components with standardized interfaces. This would provide 80% of the AR&D capability needed for future missions at much lower costs compared to current single-program approaches. The strategy argues that an integrated, evolutionary development approach coordinated across NASA centers is needed to realize the benefits of the Warehouse concept.
Design & Development Of A Schedule Management Plan PresentationChris Carson
This document summarizes the key components of a schedule management plan, which provides a methodical approach for developing a project schedule. It outlines sections for project description, team roles and responsibilities, software requirements, work products, schedule outline, work packages, and level of detail. The schedule management plan is created prior to schedule development to document assumptions and keep the process on track.
The goal of implementing Earned Value Management (EVM) in the EVA Systems Project Office (ESPO) was to utilize existing products and processes where possible to make them compatible with EVM. The presentation covered the Work Breakdown Structure, Organizational Breakdown Structure, Responsibility Assignment Matrix, Control Accounts, Work Packages, Planning Packages, Integrated Master Plan, and schedule integration using Primavera and Deltek Cobra tools. It also discussed interfaces with other processes and EVM integration with the prime contractor.
Kennedy Space Center faces the challenge of transforming its infrastructure and mission to support multiple public and private users as it transitions away from solely supporting NASA's space shuttle program; a collaborative federal and state partnership was formed to update KSC's master plan through stakeholder interviews, developing a shared vision and strategic framework, and enabling short-term wins to institutionalize new approaches. The process brought together NASA, Space Florida, the state of Florida, and AECOM to facilitate consensus building, finalizing the new master plan, and making the transformation a reality.
This document provides an overview of NASA's Joint Cost and Schedule Confidence Level (JCL) policy and its implementation status across various NASA programs and projects. Key points include:
1) The JCL policy aims to provide stronger assurance that NASA can meet cost and schedule targets and be more transparent about impacts of funding changes.
2) Programs are implementing JCLs with guidance from a working group. Some programs have completed JCLs while others are in process.
3) Developing integrated schedules, assigning probabilities and uncertainties, and producing the JCL models requires significant time and resources from project teams.
4) Next steps include exploring alternative JCL calculation methods, publishing uncertainty guidelines, and developing
This document provides an overview of NASA's Exploration Systems Development program, which is developing the Space Launch System (SLS), Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV), and associated ground systems. It discusses the analysis of alternatives that was conducted to select these systems and an incremental approach to deliver beyond low Earth orbit exploration capabilities. Key decisions included validating Orion as the crew vehicle and selecting a heavy-lift launch vehicle concept using hydrogen and rocket propellant technologies.
The document discusses the systems engineering approach applied to the SOFIA program to address issues and help make it successful. It describes assessing the program's SE&I and identifying deficiencies. An incremental development approach was taken, breaking the work into phases. This allowed requirements and SE activities to catch up over time while continuing development and obtaining early science data for support. Risk management was also emphasized through identifying and tracking priority risks.
The Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office (CSTP) manages the production, launch preparations, mission operations, and recovery of the Orion/Ares vehicle configuration that will transport crew to and from the International Space Station. The CSTP oversees the entire work cycle from element production to final disposition. It uses an organizational structure with divisions for program integration, planning and control, systems engineering, and operations. The presentation provides an overview of CSTP and updates on its projects and forward work.
The document discusses upcoming changes to NASA's independent review policies and processes. Some of the key changes include standardizing terms of reference, implementing a 1-step or 2-step review timeline, updating required lifecycle products, revising review criteria and maturity tables, and changes to review team composition and decision memos. The changes aim to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of NASA's review processes.
This document provides an annual review of Davis Langdon Ireland for 2011. It summarizes key developments in the Irish construction industry including sector developments in public, commercial, retail, residential, hotels, sports, culture and infrastructure projects. It also discusses industry developments such as the Capital Works Management Framework and working with distressed projects. The review highlights some of Davis Langdon Ireland's major projects in 2011 and looks forward to their involvement in significant upcoming projects in Ireland. It reflects on the challenges facing the Irish construction industry and calls for government support to invest in infrastructure and restore confidence in the sector.
This document summarizes a master's thesis on car-free development and pedestrian-friendly streets in Tirana, Albania. The research aims to understand issues with streets in Tirana, promote walking and cycling, and develop safer infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists. It reviews concepts of car-free development and pedestrianization. Case studies of successful pedestrian streets in Barcelona and Copenhagen are presented. The document analyzes Tirana's transportation network, identifying opportunities for new pedestrian and bike corridors. Maps show green spaces, priority transportation modes by area, and existing/proposed bike infrastructure. Charts examine traffic accidents and parking options in Tirana.
The document describes the Orion project's plans to streamline the Critical Design Review (CDR) process compared to the previous Preliminary Design Review (PDR). Key aspects of the streamlined CDR include dividing design documentation reviews into focused subgroups, improving the quality and efficiency of identifying and resolving issues through the review process, and reducing the overall number of participants. The goal is to make the CDR process more effective while reducing costs to about one-third of the PDR costs.
The document discusses the Next Generation Controlling project at Deutsche Post World Net. The project aims to transform the company's Controlling organization into an "Advanced Navigator" that better supports management. Phase 1 involved a thorough analysis of the current performance of Controlling through interviews and a survey. While Controlling has adapted successfully to changes, the analysis found room for improvement. Phase 2 will implement the IMPACT program using 11 initiatives to address opportunities identified across 6 levels, including Controlling's mission, key processes, systems, and organization. The goal is to clearly improve efficiency and effectiveness.
The Environmental Responsible Aviation (ERA) Project aims to select promising aircraft concepts and technologies by 2025 to simultaneously reduce fuel burn, noise, and emissions. Technologies will be matured from TRL 3 to 5/6 through integrated systems research. Risk management is challenging due to the technical nature of technology development projects and independent sub-projects. ERA's risk management process developed a contribution factor based on expert input to assess each technology's potential to meet ERA goals, which improves identification of risks to project success compared to traditional approaches.
The document provides an overview of the changes between the third and fourth editions of PMI's Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Some of the key changes include combining or renaming processes, expanding the triple constraints to include quality, resources and risk, adding new appendices, and aligning the PMBOK Guide with other PMI standards. The fourth edition will replace the third edition as the reference for PMI credential exams, though only a small percentage of exam questions are expected to need updates. The credential exams will be updated on a rolling schedule between June and August 2009.
The document discusses Imperial College Consultants' role in managing projects funded by the European Union's FP7 framework. ICON acts as a consortium manager, coordinating non-research activities like budgeting, reporting, dissemination, and intellectual property planning. As the manager, ICON recruits staff, organizes meetings, communicates between partners, handles finances, and sets up websites and document sharing systems. The document outlines ICON's involvement from the proposal through execution phases of FP7 projects and notes some best practices and lessons learned for effective consortium management.
This document provides an overview of project scheduling from NASA's perspective. It discusses NASA's large, complex projects and the requirements for project scheduling. The presentation covers key project scheduling processes including activity definition, sequencing, duration estimating, schedule development, status accounting, and performance reporting. It provides examples and definitions for these processes. The goal is to give attendees a basic understanding of project scheduling as it relates to NASA projects.
This document discusses the types of cost and schedule reports that NASA is required to submit to oversight bodies like Congress, OMB, and GAO. It outlines three main types of reports: [1] Baseline Reports that establish cost and schedule commitments, [2] Current Estimate Reports that provide updates, and [3] Threshold Reports required when growth thresholds are exceeded. It provides details on the timing, recipients, and required contents of each report. The document is intended to explain NASA's external reporting processes and requirements to project managers.
The document provides an overview of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Project from a project management perspective. It discusses the GPM mission objectives of improving understanding of the global water cycle and precipitation forecasts. It describes the GPM observatory and spacecraft, including instruments and ground assets. It also summarizes the project management approach, including the use of an integrated master schedule, earned value management, and joint confidence level analysis to manage schedule and costs.
Project termination can occur for various reasons such as technical or financial failure, changes in needs or priorities, or budget constraints. When a project is terminated, it impacts individuals and the organization. A terminated project requires closure while minimizing trauma through open communication. Methods of project termination include removing resources, integrating the project, or squeezing the budget. Examples of terminated NASA projects include Apollo missions 18-20 and programs such as X-33 due to cost and technical issues.
This document provides an outline for a presentation on achieving IT project success using NASA standards 7120 and 7123. It discusses key project elements like lifecycles, work breakdown structures, work products, stakeholder outreach, timelines, and an example NASA project. The outline also describes work products generated at different phases for project management, system engineering, subsystems, integration and validation, and deployment/operations. A table shows time-phased work products mapped to project phases and key decision points.
The document presents a strategy proposed by NASA's AR&D Community of Practice to address NASA's history of developing autonomous and automated rendezvous and docking (AR&D) capabilities for individual programs rather than taking an integrated agency approach. The strategy calls for developing an "AR&D Warehouse" - a library of reusable AR&D hardware and software components with standardized interfaces. This would provide 80% of the AR&D capability needed for future missions at much lower costs compared to current single-program approaches. The strategy argues that an integrated, evolutionary development approach coordinated across NASA centers is needed to realize the benefits of the Warehouse concept.
Design & Development Of A Schedule Management Plan PresentationChris Carson
This document summarizes the key components of a schedule management plan, which provides a methodical approach for developing a project schedule. It outlines sections for project description, team roles and responsibilities, software requirements, work products, schedule outline, work packages, and level of detail. The schedule management plan is created prior to schedule development to document assumptions and keep the process on track.
The goal of implementing Earned Value Management (EVM) in the EVA Systems Project Office (ESPO) was to utilize existing products and processes where possible to make them compatible with EVM. The presentation covered the Work Breakdown Structure, Organizational Breakdown Structure, Responsibility Assignment Matrix, Control Accounts, Work Packages, Planning Packages, Integrated Master Plan, and schedule integration using Primavera and Deltek Cobra tools. It also discussed interfaces with other processes and EVM integration with the prime contractor.
Kennedy Space Center faces the challenge of transforming its infrastructure and mission to support multiple public and private users as it transitions away from solely supporting NASA's space shuttle program; a collaborative federal and state partnership was formed to update KSC's master plan through stakeholder interviews, developing a shared vision and strategic framework, and enabling short-term wins to institutionalize new approaches. The process brought together NASA, Space Florida, the state of Florida, and AECOM to facilitate consensus building, finalizing the new master plan, and making the transformation a reality.
This document provides an overview of NASA's Joint Cost and Schedule Confidence Level (JCL) policy and its implementation status across various NASA programs and projects. Key points include:
1) The JCL policy aims to provide stronger assurance that NASA can meet cost and schedule targets and be more transparent about impacts of funding changes.
2) Programs are implementing JCLs with guidance from a working group. Some programs have completed JCLs while others are in process.
3) Developing integrated schedules, assigning probabilities and uncertainties, and producing the JCL models requires significant time and resources from project teams.
4) Next steps include exploring alternative JCL calculation methods, publishing uncertainty guidelines, and developing
This document provides an overview of NASA's Exploration Systems Development program, which is developing the Space Launch System (SLS), Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV), and associated ground systems. It discusses the analysis of alternatives that was conducted to select these systems and an incremental approach to deliver beyond low Earth orbit exploration capabilities. Key decisions included validating Orion as the crew vehicle and selecting a heavy-lift launch vehicle concept using hydrogen and rocket propellant technologies.
The document discusses the systems engineering approach applied to the SOFIA program to address issues and help make it successful. It describes assessing the program's SE&I and identifying deficiencies. An incremental development approach was taken, breaking the work into phases. This allowed requirements and SE activities to catch up over time while continuing development and obtaining early science data for support. Risk management was also emphasized through identifying and tracking priority risks.
The Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office (CSTP) manages the production, launch preparations, mission operations, and recovery of the Orion/Ares vehicle configuration that will transport crew to and from the International Space Station. The CSTP oversees the entire work cycle from element production to final disposition. It uses an organizational structure with divisions for program integration, planning and control, systems engineering, and operations. The presentation provides an overview of CSTP and updates on its projects and forward work.
The document discusses upcoming changes to NASA's independent review policies and processes. Some of the key changes include standardizing terms of reference, implementing a 1-step or 2-step review timeline, updating required lifecycle products, revising review criteria and maturity tables, and changes to review team composition and decision memos. The changes aim to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of NASA's review processes.
This document provides an annual review of Davis Langdon Ireland for 2011. It summarizes key developments in the Irish construction industry including sector developments in public, commercial, retail, residential, hotels, sports, culture and infrastructure projects. It also discusses industry developments such as the Capital Works Management Framework and working with distressed projects. The review highlights some of Davis Langdon Ireland's major projects in 2011 and looks forward to their involvement in significant upcoming projects in Ireland. It reflects on the challenges facing the Irish construction industry and calls for government support to invest in infrastructure and restore confidence in the sector.
This document summarizes a master's thesis on car-free development and pedestrian-friendly streets in Tirana, Albania. The research aims to understand issues with streets in Tirana, promote walking and cycling, and develop safer infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists. It reviews concepts of car-free development and pedestrianization. Case studies of successful pedestrian streets in Barcelona and Copenhagen are presented. The document analyzes Tirana's transportation network, identifying opportunities for new pedestrian and bike corridors. Maps show green spaces, priority transportation modes by area, and existing/proposed bike infrastructure. Charts examine traffic accidents and parking options in Tirana.
Davis Langdon PKS provides a range of legal, consulting, and project management services related to construction and infrastructure projects. Their Legal Support Group offers expertise in claims assessment, delay analysis, dispute resolution, and other services to support the legal process. They have experience working on various project types in Ireland as well as other countries. Their specialists aim to help clients avoid disputes and effectively resolve any issues that do arise.
2012 11 Davis Langdon Market Monitor Oct Nov 2012joregan
The document provides an overview of the European economic situation in October/November 2012. Key points include:
1) Economic data has taken a backseat to politics as the impact of elections and leadership changes on future policy are considered. Financial market conditions in Europe have stabilized after ECB intervention but sentiment remains fragile.
2) Economic indicators point to softening activity in recent months across Europe and globally. Production declined in major Eurozone countries and exports continue to fall. Economic sentiment declined across most of Europe except the UK.
3) The IMF revised down its European growth forecasts, expecting a subdued recovery taking longer than initially thought. Very weak activity is limiting fiscal consolidation efforts across most of the region.
This document appears to be a list of place names and personal names in various languages, primarily Albanian, with some names repeated. It includes street names, town/city names, and some titles or descriptions after some names. The list contains over 200 entries in a seemingly random order with no other context provided.
The document provides an annual review of the Irish construction industry in 2012. It summarizes projections for construction output, noting that output is expected to decline further in 2013 before showing low single-digit growth in subsequent years. Even with ambitious growth targets, the industry would not reach sustainable output levels until 2020 or later. Construction costs are expected to increase modestly in the coming years, while public sector construction faces challenges such as low-cost tendering and risk transfers that make it difficult for contractors and consultants.
http://inarocket.com
Learn BEM fundamentals as fast as possible. What is BEM (Block, element, modifier), BEM syntax, how it works with a real example, etc.
How to Build a Dynamic Social Media PlanPost Planner
Stop guessing and wasting your time on networks and strategies that don’t work!
Join Rebekah Radice and Katie Lance to learn how to optimize your social networks, the best kept secrets for hot content, top time management tools, and much more!
Watch the replay here: bit.ly/socialmedia-plan
Project management in pharmaceutical generic industry basics and standardsJayesh Khatri
Project management involves coordinating activities to meet objectives within constraints like time, cost and quality. It involves planning, tracking progress, and controlling a project. Key aspects include defining requirements, creating a schedule and assigning resources. Tools like Gantt charts help plan and monitor the project. Benefits-centered project management focuses on achieving business benefits in addition to project execution. Prioritization techniques like MoSCoW help determine requirement importance. Effective strategies include empowered decision making, clear roles, and collaboration across functions.
This study concentrates on an important mathematical project management technique “Earned Value Management” in order to highlight these necessary technical skills. In the first part we give necessary concepts about project management. In the following parts we highlight methods for management of two important project constraints “time” and “cost”. “Earned Value Management” technique is highlighted in the final part.
The document describes the Real Estate Developer Project Management (RED PM) Manual, which provides a systematic approach and knowledge management framework for real estate development projects. The RED PM Manual covers 8 knowledge blocks that span the entire project lifecycle from inception to completion. It establishes standard processes, procedures and documentation at each stage to ensure efficient project execution and delivery. The goal is to extract critical information quickly and make it accessible on demand for timely decision making, thereby improving organizational performance and competitiveness.
The NASA Ames Research Center has developed a scaled project management framework for IT projects under $500k based on NASA's NPR 7120.7. The framework includes Lite and Medium classifications to provide flexibility and structure for smaller projects. It establishes common project reviews, entrance and success criteria, and decision points for projects below the NPR 7120.7 threshold. The framework is designed to standardize project management practices while allowing tailoring to individual project needs.
The NASA Ames Research Center has developed a scaled project management framework for IT projects under $500k based on NASA's NPR 7120.7. The framework includes Lite and Medium classifications to provide flexibility and structure for smaller projects. It establishes common project reviews, entrance and success criteria, and decision points for projects below the NPR 7120.7 threshold. The framework is flexible and can be tailored to each individual project's needs.
Addressing Project Capital Efficiency through a Business Basis of Design
Large capital construction projects in both the industrial and infrastructure sectors are challenged today in three significant ways:
Capital efficiency of the project – this considers both first costs as well as life cycle costs
Capital certainty – reflecting execution efficiency, predictability and effective risk transfer through appropriate contracting strategies
Time to market – perhaps best thought of as schedule certainty but also accelerated delivery of projects, often an essential ingredient in capital efficiency
This paper focuses on achieving improved capital efficiency in large capital asset projects through the adoption of an expanded basis of design that considers all aspects of a capital asset’s life cycle. In many projects today the basis of design (BOD) largely encompasses the engineering parameters which are required to meet the owner’s project requirements.
Constructability and maintainability are often treated as review items to confirm that the developed design is both constructible and maintainable and to suggest improvements at the margins. Effective constructability and maintainability reviews add value to the project but do not fundamentally act to shape the design itself in most instances.
The premise of this paper is that more, much more, is required to develop effective designs that are developed with construction and maintenance as fundamental project requirements. In this sense construction and maintenance considerations are not items to be reviewed but rather fundamental requirements to be satisfied together with other project requirements established by the owner. The change suggested is about a shift in mindset and perspective as well as in our design work processes.
The document discusses different project implementation methods and introduces Pöyry's proprietary 4ePCM concept. 4ePCM is an interactive project management procedure that provides structure, clarity and efficiency through standardized definitions of functions, processes, tasks and deliverables. It integrates Pöyry's project experience into a database to transparently define roles and ensure targets are met for Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management projects.
Pmi Project Management Core Problems Uet Dec 22 09Khalid0211
This document discusses core problems with project management in the public sector in Pakistan. It provides examples of cost overruns, delays, and unsatisfactory outcomes on public projects. Reasons for failures include wrong project selection and scope, poor planning and execution, and biases in project roles. It advocates for applying established project management standards and processes like the Project Management Body of Knowledge to improve outcomes. These include integrated programming, accurate cost estimating, using tools like earned value analysis for monitoring, and incentivizing roles to prioritize schedule and cost control. Adopting project management practices could significantly reduce inflationary costs on projects and provide returns on investments in project management capabilities.
Val Lunz of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center presented best practices for enhancing the Capital Planning Investment Control (CPIC) framework to optimize business portfolio analysis. The CPIC provides a framework to strategically assess IT assets and prioritize investments. Managing the portfolio through sub-portfolios of similar investments and streamlining processes can maximize returns and leverage existing resources. Continuous evaluation and stakeholder involvement are also important to ensure the appropriate investments are selected and controlled in the current fiscal environment.
This document outlines best practices for project management of an application development process. It establishes the essential components and deliverables needed for each phase, including requirements definition, analysis and design, development and testing, implementation, and post-implementation support. Each phase passes "packets" of information to the next, including project plans, models, test results, and sign-offs. The goal is to provide structure and oversight across the entire application lifecycle from initial planning through ongoing operations.
This document provides a project report on working capital management at Nalco, an aluminum company in India. It begins with an introduction on the importance of working capital management. It then discusses Nalco's business including its history, products, 5-year performance, and production outlook. The document also covers working capital concepts, components of working capital, and strategies for managing inventory, cash, and receivables. Key financial metrics and ratios related to working capital are presented graphically. The conclusion suggests steps to increase efficiency in working capital management at Nalco.
Global Trends in the Design and Implementation of Financial Management Inform...icgfmconference
The document summarizes a study on trends in financial management information system (FMIS) projects from 1984 to 2010. Some key findings are that political commitment, adequate preparation, careful prioritization and sequencing, and developing institutional capacity early are crucial for success. It also suggests that FMIS implementation typically takes 6-7 years and follows a methodology of assessing needs, customized solution design, capacity strengthening, and long-term implementation and support.
The document outlines the Architecture Development Cycle phases in TOGAF 9. It includes 8 phases: Preliminary Phase, Requirements Management, Phase A (Architecture Vision), Phase B (Business Architecture), Phase C (Information Systems Architectures), Phase D (Technology Architecture), Phase E (Opportunities and Solutions), Phase F (Migration Planning), Phase G (Implementation Governance), and Phase H (Architecture Change Management). Each phase has specific goals and outputs to develop the business, information systems, and technology architectures and transition between them.
- Provide overall project funding and resources
- Approve project scope and major deliverables
- Resolve issues escalated by the Project Manager
- Ensure project aligns with organizational strategy
Role:
Project Manager
Authority:
The Project Manager has full authority over the project team and day to day project activities. Reports to the Project Sponsor.
Responsibilities:
- Develop and maintain project plan
- Manage project scope, schedule, costs, and quality
- Remove roadblocks for the project team
- Report on project status to stakeholders
- Manage project risks and issues
- Ensure project deliverables meet requirements
Role:
Customer Service Department Manager
Authority: N/A
Respons
The document discusses the role of project management consultants in construction projects. It outlines several key responsibilities of project management consultants, including:
1) Providing cost estimating services such as feasibility studies, budget estimates, and bid estimates.
2) Creating schedules and plans to coordinate the various parties involved in construction projects.
3) Managing the day-to-day activities on construction sites through responsibilities like troubleshooting issues.
The document argues that using project management consultants can help address shortage of specialized staff, ensure faster project completion, and better manage large capital outlays on infrastructure projects.
1. Project control through accurate progress reporting and monitoring is essential to identify issues early when corrective actions can be most effective. Overly optimistic reporting can mask delays until it is too late to remedy problems.
2. Data capture from project participants is key to monitoring progress. Structured reporting templates aligned with the project plan help ensure accurate and consistent information.
3. Effective project control involves setting performance targets with participants, documenting discussions, and using action lists to track and follow up on tasks. Regular communication and status updates are needed to keep the project on track.
Second of a two-part article published in Pharmaceutical Technology magazine in January 2006.
Part 2 describes protocol development and implementation (including advice and lessons learned), preparation of turnover packages, and the evaluation and management of deviations.
Pmp project management professional free sampleAnnsstand
This document provides an overview of project management concepts including the project life cycle, project integration management, scheduling techniques, and sample PMP exam questions. Specifically:
- It defines project management and describes the five project management processes: initiating, planning, executing, monitoring and controlling, and closing.
- It discusses the project life cycle and how projects are divided into phases with deliverables and phase exits. It also covers iterative life cycles.
- It introduces concepts like the work breakdown structure (WBS), critical path method, resource leveling, and schedule compression techniques.
- It includes examples of network diagrams, PERT calculations, and milestones charts to illustrate scheduling tools.
- Finally, it
V3 basic pm training overview thammasatRobert Twiddy
This document provides an overview of a project management fundamentals course. The course teaches the fundamentals of project management, discusses the roles of project managers and team members, and practices core project management techniques. However, the course does not provide enough training to sit for the Project Management Professional certification exam. The course objectives are to describe project manager roles, understand fundamental project management concepts, learn from case studies, and know where to find additional resources and training.
LKG Project Level Presentation FEL in New Energies 2023.ppsxAngusMacleod18
The document provides an overview of front-end loading (FEL) and gated project governance processes for capital projects. It discusses the importance of FEL in influencing project outcomes and realizing value. The objectives of a gated process are outlined as ensuring business value, risk assurance, alignment, and definition of responsibilities. An overview of typical project phases, gates, decisions, and key deliverables is presented. Industry standards for FEL and gated processes used by major oil and gas companies are also listed.
LKG Project Level Presentation FEL in New Energies 2023.ppsx
Dlpks Cwmf Technical Briefing
1. Technical Briefing
NUI Galway, Engineering Building, RMJMT Architects
Government Procedures: Davis Langdon PKS Technical Briefing
Capital Works
The Capital Works Management Framework (CWMF)
was published on www.constructionprocurement.gov.ie
in mid-August 2009. The CWMF comprises of 4 Pillars
which underpin the Government Initiative to reform public
Management
sector construction procurement.
Reasons:
Framework
The objective of the initiative is to achieve greater value for
money, cost certainty and more efficient project delivery.
Davis Langdon PKS were commissioned to prepare, in
conjunction with the Department of Finance, a key suite of
these documents.
Challenges:
All Public Sector ManagementPersonnel involved in the
management and delivery of Building and Engineering
Capital Projects must comply with these new best practice
Guidance Notes.
2. Capital Works
Management Framework
This Technical Briefing is aimed at giving an introduction Previously Published Contracts
to the overall structure of the Capital Works Management
There has been guidance note material and industry
Framework (CWMF).
training rolled out in relation to the documentation
contained in Pillars 1 & 2 (Contracts & Conditions of
The Capital Works Management Framework (CWMF)
Engagement). The principle source for the Department
consists of a suite of documents that constitutes the four
of Finance sponsored information is on:
pillars of the Framework.
www.constructionprocurement.gov.ie
Pillar 1 Public Works Contract
A suite of standard forms of construction contracts Substantive New Guidance Notes and Templates
and associated model forms, dispute resolution rules,
The second half of the CWMF (Pillars 3 & 4) has
model invitations to tender, forms of tender and
just recently been published on the above website.
schedules;
Davis Langdon PKS have been directly involved in
Pillar’s 3 and 4 where we were commissioned by
Pillar 2 Conditions of Engagement
the Department of Finance to develop a number of
The standard conditions of engagement for the key Guidance Note documents and to create the
consultants; Cost Planning and Control document templates.
Pillar 3 Cost Planning and Control
Standard templates to record data in an appropriate These key Guidance Notes relate to the critical
way, to enable analysis, future comparison and ease “Planning; Developed” and “Implementation” stages;
of retrieval.
Pillar 4 Guidance Notes Project Management
Extensive guidance notes covering the various
activities in a project delivery lifecycle.
Design Development Process
WORKS Planning and Control of Capital Costs
M
AN
Pil
AL
1 Procurement Process for Works Contractors
ar l
AGE
CAPIT
ar
l
Pil
2
MENT
Implementation Process
4
Pil
ar
l
l ar
Pil 3
RA K Project Review
F
ME R
WO
National Rehabilitation Centre Terminal II Dublin Airport
3. Project Structure Capital Appraisal Conditions Main Project
There are a number of key new components which are Stage of Engagement Activities
Stages
utilised throughout the Guidance Notes contained in Building
Pillar 4. These are;
1 Planning Stage (i) Make expert appointments
Project Coordinator Initial Feasibility Study (design studies) and appoint
Project Execution Plan Preliminary PSDP (if required)
Report
Risk & Value Management Develop Definitive Project Brief
Project Reviews
Stage (ii) Project Review 1
Design
Project Coordinator
Determine procurement strategy
The formal introduction of a Project Coordinator to the
Project Team Structure is a key development and will have Appoint Design Team
a pivotal role in leading the project.
Design Team assesses output
requirements, constraints, budget
Project Execution Plan
The creation of a Project Execution Plan at the project Project Review 2
outset establishes clear project objectives, references a
2 Planning Outline Sketch Scheme
defined scope of works and puts in place formal team Developed
structures with defined roles and responsibilities.
Project Review 3
This provides a solid footing for the team to manage Developed Sketch Scheme
the project going forward and for the project and team
performance evaluation on completion.
Project Review 4
Risk & Value Management Submit for statutory approval
Risk & Value Management are constant themes
throughout the new Best Practice Procedures and Project Review 5
the CWMF requires that these processes are implemented Stage (iii) Detailed Design
at the various project stages. Tender (not design-and-build)
Project Reviews Project Review 6
A series of defined Red and Amber project reviews Conduct Tender process
have been established with clear procedures as to
the steps to be taken to move to the next stage.
Project Review 7
Red are those that require submission of a report
and Sanctioning Authority approval in writing 3 Implementation Stage (iv) Award contract
prior to proceeding. Construction Administer Contract
Stage (v) Supervise management of
Amber require reporting to and review by the Sponsoring construction process
Handover
Agency who in turn should inform the Sanctioning
Authority. The project can proceed once the 4 Review Manage the Post Project Review
Sanctioning Authority has been informed.
University of Limerick Indoor Pitch Arena
4. Capital Works
Management Framework
Are you involved in Public Sector Capital Projects?
Davis Langdon PKS
Construction Consultants
Contact Information
Are you aware of all the documentation governing the
Capital Works Management Framework?
DLPKS Dublin Office
24 Lower Hatch Street Do you understand your roles and responsibilities and those of other parties
Dublin 2 involved in projects, under the new Capital Works Management Framework?
Phone + 353 1 676 3671 Have you reviewed your processes and procedures to maximise efficiency,
FAX + 353 1 676 3672 project success and compliance with the CWMF?
Email dlpks@dlpks.ie
If you have a requirement for assistance in the adoption of the CWMF please
DLPKS Galway Office
contact Davis Langdon PKS who have a dedicated Public Sector Management
Heritage Hall
Kirwan’s Lane Team. Davis Langdon PKS can work with Sanctioning Authorities and Sponsoring
Galway Agencies to establish sector and project specific CWMF Implementation Plans. In
addition we can offer bespoke training for staff and those charged with the
Phone + 353 91 530 199 implementation of the CWMF.
FAX + 353 91 530 198
Email dlpks@dlpks.ie
Contact:
DLPKS Limerick Office
Tomás Kelly
Mezzanine Suite
Riverpoint
Lower Mallow Street Davis Langdon PKS
Limerick Construction Consultants
Heritage Hall, Kirwan’s Lane
Phone + 353 61 318 870 Galway
FAX + 353 61 317 871
Email dlpks@dlpks.ie Tel + 353 91 530199
Fax + 353 91 530198
Email: tkelly@dlpks.ie
DLPKS Cork Office
Hibernian House
80A South Mall
Cork
Phone + 353 21 422 2800
FAX + 353 21 422 2802
Email dlpks@dlpks.ie
Cork Civic Offices Galway Coach Station