Dialogic Design for Foresight : DwD Workshop
•
1 like•2,591 views
This document summarizes a design workshop that took place to discuss future challenges of increasing urbanization in Southern Ontario by 2030. 1) The workshop used a structured dialogic design approach to guide a democratic dialogue toward effective action. 18 participants from diverse backgrounds discussed the challenges. 2)
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Prototyping Resilience: Using games to engage communities in disaster response
Prototyping Resilience: Using games to engage communities in disaster responseSystemic Design Association (SDA)
From Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD9) 2020 Symposium. National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad, India, October 9-17, 2020.Structured Dialogic Design
This document discusses structured dialogic design (SDD) as a methodology for facilitating large group collaboration and decision making around complex problems. It outlines some key challenges with large group work, including complexity, lack of shared understanding, and limited cognitive abilities. SDD provides a structured process and graphic tools to help large groups unpack complexity, build shared understanding, and make informed decisions through techniques like clustering observations, identifying influence relationships, and developing action plans. The document includes examples of SDD being used to address barriers to public participation in broadband access.
C2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked Problems
Artful and Disciplined Dialogue for Today’s Wicked Problems
Effective change leadership requires negotiating both open and disciplined participation, especially when addressing fuzzy situations such as peace or political reform. What if we treated social and policy issues as wicked problems, concerns that are never “solved,” but are satisfied through evolutionary progression? This approach to social design requires a mix of dialogue styles to enhance ideation and mitigate power in multi-stakeholder engagements.
We present both Art of Hosting (open) and Structured Dialogue as a mix of participation models for problem-focused planning and decision-making. While rarely used together today, we explore why both perspectives help in today’s complex concerns in democratic decision-making.
Patterns for collaborative creativity
The document discusses patterns for promoting individual and collective creativity in socio-technical systems. It outlines different types of knowledge and the importance of social factors in technology design. Some proposed patterns are described, including "Reality Check", "Who Speaks for Wolf?", and "Greater Gathering" which aim to balance diversity and shared identity in groups over time.
SDD Symposium - Bringing Design to Dialogic Design
This document discusses the intersection of systems thinking and design. It proposes 10 shared design principles derived from systems theories that can guide design practices for complex social systems. These principles include idealization, appreciating complexity, purpose finding, boundary framing, requisite variety, feedback coordination, system ordering, generative emergence, continuous adaptation, and self-organizing. The document maps these principles to both general design methodologies and specific methods used in Dialogic Design. It concludes that these principles can serve to integrate practices across design projects for complex social domains and address some gaps in current approaches.
Antinomies in Systemic Design
This document discusses antinomies and dilemmas in systemic design. It outlines Werner Ulrich's work on the unfolding systems dilemma and critique versus maps versus design. It also discusses Horst Rittel's work on dilemmas in social policy and Churchman's concept of wicked problems. The document then examines four specific dilemmas: the systems dilemma regarding distance from reality, the heuristic dilemma on positive or negative approaches, the people dilemma on perspective, and the nudge dilemma on exclusion. It closes with reflections on boundary critique, iterative processes, and bringing different concepts together using real-time process data.
The Other Side of Design: Tension manifolds and collective action
This document proposes tension manifolds as a design medium for enabling collective action on complex social issues. It describes tensions that emerge from stakeholders' differing perspectives on an issue, forming dynamic fields that influence perceptions and relationships. Tension manifolds represent these tensions spatially, with curvature and intersections depicting paradoxes. The design strategies are to alter stakeholders' perspectives; identify high-tension structures; and define points to adjust pre-loaded tensions and relationships, allowing greater freedom. Tension manifolds conceptualize tensions as a design surface for collaborative exploration and identification of affordances.
Anticipation 2017 Assembling Requisite Stakeholder Variety
This document discusses ensuring variety in stakeholder representation in foresight practices to reduce cognitive biases. It notes that foresight methods often mix to reduce reliance on one, but variety is also needed in stakeholder perspectives represented. Without accounting for cognitive and temporal biases in who is selected, four points of failure can occur: biased framing, biased content selection, horizon bias in stakeholders, and insufficient variety. The document advocates for evolutionary sampling to map categories related to the issue and minimize influence of biases, expanding variety both within the issue and beyond the future system. It also discusses accounting for individuals' temporal preferences to avoid horizon biases within groups.
Recommended
Prototyping Resilience: Using games to engage communities in disaster response
Prototyping Resilience: Using games to engage communities in disaster responseSystemic Design Association (SDA)
From Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD9) 2020 Symposium. National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad, India, October 9-17, 2020.Structured Dialogic Design
This document discusses structured dialogic design (SDD) as a methodology for facilitating large group collaboration and decision making around complex problems. It outlines some key challenges with large group work, including complexity, lack of shared understanding, and limited cognitive abilities. SDD provides a structured process and graphic tools to help large groups unpack complexity, build shared understanding, and make informed decisions through techniques like clustering observations, identifying influence relationships, and developing action plans. The document includes examples of SDD being used to address barriers to public participation in broadband access.
C2D2 Artful & Disciplined Dialogue for Wicked Problems
Artful and Disciplined Dialogue for Today’s Wicked Problems
Effective change leadership requires negotiating both open and disciplined participation, especially when addressing fuzzy situations such as peace or political reform. What if we treated social and policy issues as wicked problems, concerns that are never “solved,” but are satisfied through evolutionary progression? This approach to social design requires a mix of dialogue styles to enhance ideation and mitigate power in multi-stakeholder engagements.
We present both Art of Hosting (open) and Structured Dialogue as a mix of participation models for problem-focused planning and decision-making. While rarely used together today, we explore why both perspectives help in today’s complex concerns in democratic decision-making.
Patterns for collaborative creativity
The document discusses patterns for promoting individual and collective creativity in socio-technical systems. It outlines different types of knowledge and the importance of social factors in technology design. Some proposed patterns are described, including "Reality Check", "Who Speaks for Wolf?", and "Greater Gathering" which aim to balance diversity and shared identity in groups over time.
SDD Symposium - Bringing Design to Dialogic Design
This document discusses the intersection of systems thinking and design. It proposes 10 shared design principles derived from systems theories that can guide design practices for complex social systems. These principles include idealization, appreciating complexity, purpose finding, boundary framing, requisite variety, feedback coordination, system ordering, generative emergence, continuous adaptation, and self-organizing. The document maps these principles to both general design methodologies and specific methods used in Dialogic Design. It concludes that these principles can serve to integrate practices across design projects for complex social domains and address some gaps in current approaches.
Antinomies in Systemic Design
This document discusses antinomies and dilemmas in systemic design. It outlines Werner Ulrich's work on the unfolding systems dilemma and critique versus maps versus design. It also discusses Horst Rittel's work on dilemmas in social policy and Churchman's concept of wicked problems. The document then examines four specific dilemmas: the systems dilemma regarding distance from reality, the heuristic dilemma on positive or negative approaches, the people dilemma on perspective, and the nudge dilemma on exclusion. It closes with reflections on boundary critique, iterative processes, and bringing different concepts together using real-time process data.
The Other Side of Design: Tension manifolds and collective action
This document proposes tension manifolds as a design medium for enabling collective action on complex social issues. It describes tensions that emerge from stakeholders' differing perspectives on an issue, forming dynamic fields that influence perceptions and relationships. Tension manifolds represent these tensions spatially, with curvature and intersections depicting paradoxes. The design strategies are to alter stakeholders' perspectives; identify high-tension structures; and define points to adjust pre-loaded tensions and relationships, allowing greater freedom. Tension manifolds conceptualize tensions as a design surface for collaborative exploration and identification of affordances.
Anticipation 2017 Assembling Requisite Stakeholder Variety
This document discusses ensuring variety in stakeholder representation in foresight practices to reduce cognitive biases. It notes that foresight methods often mix to reduce reliance on one, but variety is also needed in stakeholder perspectives represented. Without accounting for cognitive and temporal biases in who is selected, four points of failure can occur: biased framing, biased content selection, horizon bias in stakeholders, and insufficient variety. The document advocates for evolutionary sampling to map categories related to the issue and minimize influence of biases, expanding variety both within the issue and beyond the future system. It also discusses accounting for individuals' temporal preferences to avoid horizon biases within groups.
Not in my backyard! michael randel - april 29 2011
Conference presentation - using the Dialogue Mapping approach to build shared understanding and commitment to change, especially on complex, interdependent problems.
Integration of multiple approaches into the Social Lab practice. A case study...
The document summarizes the work of NouLAB, an organization that uses participatory practices and design thinking to intervene in systems. It discusses NouLAB's structure which brings together collective insight from multiple sectors. NouLAB works outside of government which allows it to take a critical stance and try novel approaches to improve processes. The document highlights how NouLAB's approach focuses on systems change through changed relationships and networking to create tipping points for wider change.
ISSS Visual Languages in Systemic Design
This document discusses the potential for integrating visual languages from systems thinking into design practice to enhance understanding of complex social and service systems. It argues that systemic thinking is better expressed through design languages than traditional systems formalisms. Various existing visual languages from fields like system dynamics and soft systems methodology are presented, but the document advocates developing systems practices directly from a design perspective to address gaps in addressing complexity through design. Examples from redesigning healthcare systems and supply chains are provided to illustrate how visual languages can help uncover patterns and relationships to inform systemic design.
What is an idea network (aka concept map) and how and why to map a network of...
Idea Network Analysis is a method for crowdsourcing the understanding of and the design of interventions for any number of complex challenges. Unlike typical group processes which rely on achieving consensus; this process allows the many and diverse viewpoints on an issue to emerge. The methodology relies on brainstorming, sorting, and rating to collect input from the group. Input is web enabled so that participants respond at a time and place convenient for the participant; time zones and geography are not barriers to participation. Multivariate statistical analyses create a visual representation, a map, of the group's thinking. The group can interpret the map, discuss the mean and plan actions based on their collective wisdom. The maps are visual so knowledge of the underlying mathematics is not required.
Software and other resources at: http://dmclinden.github.io/
Anticipatory Factors in Dialogic Design ISSS 2016
Applications of the systemic practices of dialogic design (Structured Dialogic Design and it variants) have recently developed and integrated futures and foresight models as anticipatory frameworks for policy and long-term planning situations (Weigand, et al, 2014). We have identified this model of practice as collaborative foresight, reflecting the perspective from practice that futures literacy must be considered an essential complement to multi-stakeholder deliberation where complex and competing interests are considered in planning and decision making. This study proposes approaches to advancement in science and practice that integrate essential properties of collective anticipatory modelling for design decisions.
Scientific principles for dialogic design have been developed and practiced over the course of nearly 50 years of developmental evolution, following Warfield’s (1986) Domain of Science Model (DoSM) and Christakis’ (2006, 2008) research extending the DoSM. One of the key principles in the DoSM refers to the recursive learning necessary to develop systemic practices, a second-order (deutero) learning process as noted in Warfield’s DoSM cycle. The standard model requires warranted claims to be evaluated from their testing in the Arena of real-world practice and reflective learning in order to advance new theory for inclusion in the accepted Corpus (theory supported by accepted evidence).
Recent developments from practice following from advanced design and strategic foresight theory lend support for progressing the models of dialogic design to explicitly entail methods of design and futuring within the historical model of dialogue. The observation driving this proposal can be summarized as “participants in collective designing efforts are likely to fail in their expected outcomes if they do not facilitate the requisite anticipation of future complexity in their domain of action.” Simply put, people will make significantly better plans and policies together if they can develop competency in futures thinking and share their understanding with one another.
DwD Civic Empower Berlin
This document describes a design workshop focused on civic engagement and empowerment. The workshop uses dialogic methods like World Cafe and Open Space to have participants discover current examples of community-led services, brainstorm new service possibilities for their neighborhood, and design one idea in small groups. Structured dialogue techniques aim to resolve groupthink and elicit root causes and interconnections to find consensus among diverse stakeholders. The goal is for citizens to co-create new community services to fill needs once expected of government.
Designing systems as desirable side effects Rsd8
1) CMHC identified designing a Canada Housing Benefit as requiring an innovative human-centered approach and convened multiple stakeholders through a Solutions Lab.
2) While a housing benefit aims to subsidize unaffordable housing, convening stakeholders around short and long-term goals can have desirable systemic outcomes like collaboration.
3) By addressing immediate problems and long-term visions simultaneously, moments of urgency can be leveraged to seed systemic change, build shared understanding over time, and strengthen relationships between organizations.
Systemic Design Toolkit - Systems Innovation Barcelona
The Systemic Design Toolkit represents a formalized set of methods and research tools designed by Namahn and developed with collaboration by me (SDA) and Alex Ryan of MaRS. The Toolkit can be discovered at https://www.systemicdesigntoolkit.org/
Designing Futures to Flourish: ISSS 2015 keynote
We now find ourselves as a systems thinking community inquiring into planetary governance for climate and ecological politics. The Anthropocene demands a planetary response, and yet we often find even our fellow travelers tethered to discourses of technological management, cultural change, and right action. We might now advocate a stronger role for social systems design as a process for continual engagement of citizen stakeholders, and between these citizens and policy makers, as advocated by Christakis, Ulrich and others. As we have seen power (economic and political) separate from its cultural histories, and become globalized, we may find ourselves in trajectories of action but with marginal power to effect societal outcomes.
We are faced with a dual mandate of restorative system design, recovering human needs in our communities, and policy system design, restoring the long historical arc toward democratic governance. And as these are both designable contexts, systemic design can integrate ecological, technological and design thinking to guide policy in more productive ways.
• We find ourselves captured in the politics of solutionism. Most presentations of the “problems” as stated before us reveal a trajectory of preferred solutions and their possible shortcomings.
• Climate change, even the entire Anthropocene aeonic perspective, represents a problematique of multiple effects systems. We are bound up in political discourses of “system change” and do not share a compelling common view of a flourishing world. We seem unable to reregister the most compelling societal choices and drivers save carbon mitigation.
• We have not conducted, to my knowledge, a substantial stakeholder discovery that extends beyond the immediate and obvious primary combatants in the climate change wars.
• As citizens and political actors on the planetary stage, we have been afraid or unable to present a clear view of the risk scenarios, possible governance strategies, or a normative plan for serious global investment. If the planet were a business concern, it would be in receivership by now.
Rowland CHRIIS Model
This document introduces the CHRIIS model, a systemic design tool developed by Gordon Rowland to facilitate change. The model consists of 6 steps: Challenge identity, Honor values, Release assumptions, Imagine ideals, Innovate actions, and Sustain transformation. It is intended to be used by non-experts to design change processes within organizations or groups in an ethical and participatory way. Examples are provided of how the CHRIIS model could be applied to redesign an academic program or guide inquiry within a classroom setting.
Eco-Social Transformations: Leading Principles and Generative Forces
1) The document discusses eco-social transformations and their leading principles and generative forces. It outlines principles of efficiency, sufficiency, and consistency and frameworks of actors, cultures, and systems.
2) Key generative forces that drive transformations include innovative and creative organizational cultures, cultural diversity, and organizational cultures that range from calculative to generative.
3) Becoming "fit for the future" requires thinking towards the future and being sensitive to generative forces through perceiving what has not yet become reality and shaping it.
Systemic Design Principles & Methods ISSS 2014
Research paper presentation at ISSS 2014: Design Research Methods for Systemic Design: Perspectives from Design Education and Practice
The recent development of systemic design as a research-based practice draws on long-held precedents in the system sciences toward representation of complex social and enterprise systems. A precedent article, published as Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems (Jones, 2014) established an axiomatic and epistemological basis for complementary principles shared between design reasoning and systems theory. The current paper aims to establish a basis for identifying shared methods (techne) and action practice (phronesis). Systemic design is distinguished from user-oriented or industrial design practices in terms of its direct relationship to systems theory and explicit adoption of social system design tenets. Systemic design is concerned with higher-order socially-organized systems that encompass multiple subsystems in a complex policy, organizational or product-service context. By integrating systems thinking and its methods, systemic design brings human-centered design to complex, multi-stakeholder service systems as those found in industrial networks, transportation, medicine and healthcare. It adapts from known design competencies - form and process reasoning, social and generative research methods, and sketching and visualization practices - to describe, map, propose and reconfigure complex services and systems.
Designing the Systems Sciences - AHO, Oslo, Oct 2012
This document discusses integrating systems thinking and design practices. It argues that while design sidesteps entrenched systems through unpredictable leaps, systems thinking sees design as problem solving and has not evolved with design. The document examines how systems theories have appropriated design and underconceptualized it. It proposes that both systems and design thinking could be enhanced through a more durable co-relationship and by acknowledging each other's perspectives and practices.
How Might We: Simplexity in Design Charrettes
This document describes Peter Jones' work applying design thinking and systems thinking approaches. It provides an overview of his background and areas of focus, including strategic foresight, innovation, and design for complex problems in healthcare, climate adaptation, and more. It then outlines a design thinking process called Simplexity that engages stakeholders in problem finding, research, defining challenges, idea generation, and prototyping solutions through collaborative workshops.
Effective Strategy Making in Economic & Community Development
This document summarizes a presentation on effective economic and community development strategies. It finds that effective strategies tend to have network structures, be asset-based, involve iterative planning and implementation, include short-term goals, decentralize implementation, and use metrics to learn what works. A study interviewed experts and surveyed participants in strategies, finding moderate to strong correlations between effectiveness and factors like network structures and asset-based approaches. The document concludes that using an approach called "strategic doing" may help enable effective community collaborations.
LLC Webinar | Network Structures: Innovative Governance and Decision-Making w...
LLC Webinar | Network Structures: Innovative Governance and Decision-Making w...Leadership Learning Community
Many networks organize governance and operations with structures that mirror those of organizations: governing boards, committees, and operations staff. Unfortunately, these structures have often been a bad fit with networks, leading to decreased involvement and engagement by network participants who aren't on the governing board and shrinking network size and impact.
More and more networks are experimenting with and co-creating innovative network governance and structures that are self-organizing, encouraging and supporting the formation of collaborative circles for many or all of the operations and coordination functions of the network.
June Holley will share examples and offer several checklists and strategy worksheets to help your network determine if these new structures might be appropriate for them.
Systemic Design Contexts ISSS 2014
An agenda for Systemic Design - An emerging research and educational track in systems sciences and design.
Peter Jones talk at ISSS 2014
Movements in Design & Systems Thinking
Education Movements
RSD3 Symposium
Systemic Design Research
Relationship to Systems Community
Lunchtime Talk: Evaluating design enabled innovations
Special session: evaluating design enabled innovations – towards a common impact evaluation methodology
Lima Meninato Core Shifts for Emerging Desired Futures
This workshop aims to help participants explore their desired futures and the barriers preventing these futures from being achieved. It uses a technique called Causal Layered Analysis to uncover the deep-seated beliefs and systems that both perpetuate current problems and limit visions of alternative futures. The workshop is divided into morning and afternoon sessions. In the morning, participants will reflect on and discuss their ideas of a desired future. In the afternoon, they will analyze the systems and beliefs needing to change to make their idealized futures possible, bringing unconscious constraints into conscious awareness. The goal is to help participants envision alternative futures by addressing underlying causes of failures in the present system and questioning limiting beliefs.
Sevaldson What is Systemic Design
Systemic design is based on systems thinking and takes a systemic perspective to design practice and design thinking. It views design as an inherently systemic activity. Systemic design is informed by general systems theory, soft systems methodology, systems architecting, and critical systems thinking. It is a practice that involves methods, skills, knowledge, concepts, strategies, and reflection. Systemic design moves beyond sharing data and facts by facilitating sense-making and team sense-making. It questions the divide between planning and execution by embracing continuous systems change over time through an orchestrated process with no clear end.
Horizontal Leadership Managing Change And Complexity Eng 2009
Why is it so, that today's challenges increasingly fall between stools?
How to lead horizontally across organizational boundaries without a formal authority and mandate?
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...Community Development Society
A presentation that asks the question "Why are some strategies for economic and community development successful and others...not so much?"More Related Content
What's hot
Not in my backyard! michael randel - april 29 2011
Conference presentation - using the Dialogue Mapping approach to build shared understanding and commitment to change, especially on complex, interdependent problems.
Integration of multiple approaches into the Social Lab practice. A case study...
The document summarizes the work of NouLAB, an organization that uses participatory practices and design thinking to intervene in systems. It discusses NouLAB's structure which brings together collective insight from multiple sectors. NouLAB works outside of government which allows it to take a critical stance and try novel approaches to improve processes. The document highlights how NouLAB's approach focuses on systems change through changed relationships and networking to create tipping points for wider change.
ISSS Visual Languages in Systemic Design
This document discusses the potential for integrating visual languages from systems thinking into design practice to enhance understanding of complex social and service systems. It argues that systemic thinking is better expressed through design languages than traditional systems formalisms. Various existing visual languages from fields like system dynamics and soft systems methodology are presented, but the document advocates developing systems practices directly from a design perspective to address gaps in addressing complexity through design. Examples from redesigning healthcare systems and supply chains are provided to illustrate how visual languages can help uncover patterns and relationships to inform systemic design.
What is an idea network (aka concept map) and how and why to map a network of...
Idea Network Analysis is a method for crowdsourcing the understanding of and the design of interventions for any number of complex challenges. Unlike typical group processes which rely on achieving consensus; this process allows the many and diverse viewpoints on an issue to emerge. The methodology relies on brainstorming, sorting, and rating to collect input from the group. Input is web enabled so that participants respond at a time and place convenient for the participant; time zones and geography are not barriers to participation. Multivariate statistical analyses create a visual representation, a map, of the group's thinking. The group can interpret the map, discuss the mean and plan actions based on their collective wisdom. The maps are visual so knowledge of the underlying mathematics is not required.
Software and other resources at: http://dmclinden.github.io/
Anticipatory Factors in Dialogic Design ISSS 2016
Applications of the systemic practices of dialogic design (Structured Dialogic Design and it variants) have recently developed and integrated futures and foresight models as anticipatory frameworks for policy and long-term planning situations (Weigand, et al, 2014). We have identified this model of practice as collaborative foresight, reflecting the perspective from practice that futures literacy must be considered an essential complement to multi-stakeholder deliberation where complex and competing interests are considered in planning and decision making. This study proposes approaches to advancement in science and practice that integrate essential properties of collective anticipatory modelling for design decisions.
Scientific principles for dialogic design have been developed and practiced over the course of nearly 50 years of developmental evolution, following Warfield’s (1986) Domain of Science Model (DoSM) and Christakis’ (2006, 2008) research extending the DoSM. One of the key principles in the DoSM refers to the recursive learning necessary to develop systemic practices, a second-order (deutero) learning process as noted in Warfield’s DoSM cycle. The standard model requires warranted claims to be evaluated from their testing in the Arena of real-world practice and reflective learning in order to advance new theory for inclusion in the accepted Corpus (theory supported by accepted evidence).
Recent developments from practice following from advanced design and strategic foresight theory lend support for progressing the models of dialogic design to explicitly entail methods of design and futuring within the historical model of dialogue. The observation driving this proposal can be summarized as “participants in collective designing efforts are likely to fail in their expected outcomes if they do not facilitate the requisite anticipation of future complexity in their domain of action.” Simply put, people will make significantly better plans and policies together if they can develop competency in futures thinking and share their understanding with one another.
DwD Civic Empower Berlin
This document describes a design workshop focused on civic engagement and empowerment. The workshop uses dialogic methods like World Cafe and Open Space to have participants discover current examples of community-led services, brainstorm new service possibilities for their neighborhood, and design one idea in small groups. Structured dialogue techniques aim to resolve groupthink and elicit root causes and interconnections to find consensus among diverse stakeholders. The goal is for citizens to co-create new community services to fill needs once expected of government.
Designing systems as desirable side effects Rsd8
1) CMHC identified designing a Canada Housing Benefit as requiring an innovative human-centered approach and convened multiple stakeholders through a Solutions Lab.
2) While a housing benefit aims to subsidize unaffordable housing, convening stakeholders around short and long-term goals can have desirable systemic outcomes like collaboration.
3) By addressing immediate problems and long-term visions simultaneously, moments of urgency can be leveraged to seed systemic change, build shared understanding over time, and strengthen relationships between organizations.
Systemic Design Toolkit - Systems Innovation Barcelona
The Systemic Design Toolkit represents a formalized set of methods and research tools designed by Namahn and developed with collaboration by me (SDA) and Alex Ryan of MaRS. The Toolkit can be discovered at https://www.systemicdesigntoolkit.org/
Designing Futures to Flourish: ISSS 2015 keynote
We now find ourselves as a systems thinking community inquiring into planetary governance for climate and ecological politics. The Anthropocene demands a planetary response, and yet we often find even our fellow travelers tethered to discourses of technological management, cultural change, and right action. We might now advocate a stronger role for social systems design as a process for continual engagement of citizen stakeholders, and between these citizens and policy makers, as advocated by Christakis, Ulrich and others. As we have seen power (economic and political) separate from its cultural histories, and become globalized, we may find ourselves in trajectories of action but with marginal power to effect societal outcomes.
We are faced with a dual mandate of restorative system design, recovering human needs in our communities, and policy system design, restoring the long historical arc toward democratic governance. And as these are both designable contexts, systemic design can integrate ecological, technological and design thinking to guide policy in more productive ways.
• We find ourselves captured in the politics of solutionism. Most presentations of the “problems” as stated before us reveal a trajectory of preferred solutions and their possible shortcomings.
• Climate change, even the entire Anthropocene aeonic perspective, represents a problematique of multiple effects systems. We are bound up in political discourses of “system change” and do not share a compelling common view of a flourishing world. We seem unable to reregister the most compelling societal choices and drivers save carbon mitigation.
• We have not conducted, to my knowledge, a substantial stakeholder discovery that extends beyond the immediate and obvious primary combatants in the climate change wars.
• As citizens and political actors on the planetary stage, we have been afraid or unable to present a clear view of the risk scenarios, possible governance strategies, or a normative plan for serious global investment. If the planet were a business concern, it would be in receivership by now.
Rowland CHRIIS Model
This document introduces the CHRIIS model, a systemic design tool developed by Gordon Rowland to facilitate change. The model consists of 6 steps: Challenge identity, Honor values, Release assumptions, Imagine ideals, Innovate actions, and Sustain transformation. It is intended to be used by non-experts to design change processes within organizations or groups in an ethical and participatory way. Examples are provided of how the CHRIIS model could be applied to redesign an academic program or guide inquiry within a classroom setting.
Eco-Social Transformations: Leading Principles and Generative Forces
1) The document discusses eco-social transformations and their leading principles and generative forces. It outlines principles of efficiency, sufficiency, and consistency and frameworks of actors, cultures, and systems.
2) Key generative forces that drive transformations include innovative and creative organizational cultures, cultural diversity, and organizational cultures that range from calculative to generative.
3) Becoming "fit for the future" requires thinking towards the future and being sensitive to generative forces through perceiving what has not yet become reality and shaping it.
Systemic Design Principles & Methods ISSS 2014
Research paper presentation at ISSS 2014: Design Research Methods for Systemic Design: Perspectives from Design Education and Practice
The recent development of systemic design as a research-based practice draws on long-held precedents in the system sciences toward representation of complex social and enterprise systems. A precedent article, published as Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems (Jones, 2014) established an axiomatic and epistemological basis for complementary principles shared between design reasoning and systems theory. The current paper aims to establish a basis for identifying shared methods (techne) and action practice (phronesis). Systemic design is distinguished from user-oriented or industrial design practices in terms of its direct relationship to systems theory and explicit adoption of social system design tenets. Systemic design is concerned with higher-order socially-organized systems that encompass multiple subsystems in a complex policy, organizational or product-service context. By integrating systems thinking and its methods, systemic design brings human-centered design to complex, multi-stakeholder service systems as those found in industrial networks, transportation, medicine and healthcare. It adapts from known design competencies - form and process reasoning, social and generative research methods, and sketching and visualization practices - to describe, map, propose and reconfigure complex services and systems.
Designing the Systems Sciences - AHO, Oslo, Oct 2012
This document discusses integrating systems thinking and design practices. It argues that while design sidesteps entrenched systems through unpredictable leaps, systems thinking sees design as problem solving and has not evolved with design. The document examines how systems theories have appropriated design and underconceptualized it. It proposes that both systems and design thinking could be enhanced through a more durable co-relationship and by acknowledging each other's perspectives and practices.
How Might We: Simplexity in Design Charrettes
This document describes Peter Jones' work applying design thinking and systems thinking approaches. It provides an overview of his background and areas of focus, including strategic foresight, innovation, and design for complex problems in healthcare, climate adaptation, and more. It then outlines a design thinking process called Simplexity that engages stakeholders in problem finding, research, defining challenges, idea generation, and prototyping solutions through collaborative workshops.
Effective Strategy Making in Economic & Community Development
This document summarizes a presentation on effective economic and community development strategies. It finds that effective strategies tend to have network structures, be asset-based, involve iterative planning and implementation, include short-term goals, decentralize implementation, and use metrics to learn what works. A study interviewed experts and surveyed participants in strategies, finding moderate to strong correlations between effectiveness and factors like network structures and asset-based approaches. The document concludes that using an approach called "strategic doing" may help enable effective community collaborations.
LLC Webinar | Network Structures: Innovative Governance and Decision-Making w...
LLC Webinar | Network Structures: Innovative Governance and Decision-Making w...Leadership Learning Community
Many networks organize governance and operations with structures that mirror those of organizations: governing boards, committees, and operations staff. Unfortunately, these structures have often been a bad fit with networks, leading to decreased involvement and engagement by network participants who aren't on the governing board and shrinking network size and impact.
More and more networks are experimenting with and co-creating innovative network governance and structures that are self-organizing, encouraging and supporting the formation of collaborative circles for many or all of the operations and coordination functions of the network.
June Holley will share examples and offer several checklists and strategy worksheets to help your network determine if these new structures might be appropriate for them.
Systemic Design Contexts ISSS 2014
An agenda for Systemic Design - An emerging research and educational track in systems sciences and design.
Peter Jones talk at ISSS 2014
Movements in Design & Systems Thinking
Education Movements
RSD3 Symposium
Systemic Design Research
Relationship to Systems Community
Lunchtime Talk: Evaluating design enabled innovations
Special session: evaluating design enabled innovations – towards a common impact evaluation methodology
Lima Meninato Core Shifts for Emerging Desired Futures
This workshop aims to help participants explore their desired futures and the barriers preventing these futures from being achieved. It uses a technique called Causal Layered Analysis to uncover the deep-seated beliefs and systems that both perpetuate current problems and limit visions of alternative futures. The workshop is divided into morning and afternoon sessions. In the morning, participants will reflect on and discuss their ideas of a desired future. In the afternoon, they will analyze the systems and beliefs needing to change to make their idealized futures possible, bringing unconscious constraints into conscious awareness. The goal is to help participants envision alternative futures by addressing underlying causes of failures in the present system and questioning limiting beliefs.
Sevaldson What is Systemic Design
Systemic design is based on systems thinking and takes a systemic perspective to design practice and design thinking. It views design as an inherently systemic activity. Systemic design is informed by general systems theory, soft systems methodology, systems architecting, and critical systems thinking. It is a practice that involves methods, skills, knowledge, concepts, strategies, and reflection. Systemic design moves beyond sharing data and facts by facilitating sense-making and team sense-making. It questions the divide between planning and execution by embracing continuous systems change over time through an orchestrated process with no clear end.
What's hot (20)
Not in my backyard! michael randel - april 29 2011
Not in my backyard! michael randel - april 29 2011
Integration of multiple approaches into the Social Lab practice. A case study...
Integration of multiple approaches into the Social Lab practice. A case study...
What is an idea network (aka concept map) and how and why to map a network of...
What is an idea network (aka concept map) and how and why to map a network of...
Systemic Design Toolkit - Systems Innovation Barcelona
Systemic Design Toolkit - Systems Innovation Barcelona
Eco-Social Transformations: Leading Principles and Generative Forces
Eco-Social Transformations: Leading Principles and Generative Forces
Designing the Systems Sciences - AHO, Oslo, Oct 2012
Designing the Systems Sciences - AHO, Oslo, Oct 2012
Effective Strategy Making in Economic & Community Development
Effective Strategy Making in Economic & Community Development
LLC Webinar | Network Structures: Innovative Governance and Decision-Making w...
LLC Webinar | Network Structures: Innovative Governance and Decision-Making w...
Lunchtime Talk: Evaluating design enabled innovations
Lunchtime Talk: Evaluating design enabled innovations
Lima Meninato Core Shifts for Emerging Desired Futures
Lima Meninato Core Shifts for Emerging Desired Futures
Similar to Dialogic Design for Foresight : DwD Workshop
Horizontal Leadership Managing Change And Complexity Eng 2009
Why is it so, that today's challenges increasingly fall between stools?
How to lead horizontally across organizational boundaries without a formal authority and mandate?
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...Community Development Society
A presentation that asks the question "Why are some strategies for economic and community development successful and others...not so much?"Getting from There to Here: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from There to Here: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...Community Development Society
A presentation that asks the question "Why are some strategies for economic and community development successful and others...not so much?"Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...Community Development Society
The document summarizes a presentation about effective strategies for economic and community development. It discusses how community change issues have become more complex over time as institutions have emerged to address them. Effective strategies are characterized by network structures, asset-based frameworks, iterative planning and implementation, inclusion of short-term goals, decentralized implementation, use of metrics to learn what works, high trust among participants, and readiness for change in the community. Ineffective strategies tend to have opposing characteristics.Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...Scott Hutcheson, Ph.D.
Slides used on July 23, 2014 in Dubuque, Iowa during presentation at the Annual Conference of the Community Development Society Facilitating Complexity: Methods & Mindsets for Exploration
This document outlines methods and mindsets for facilitating exploration. It discusses assumptions around facilitation, setting boundaries, contextual awareness, and mapping problems. It then covers techniques like externalization, divergence, convergence, and ritual dissent to generate and refine ideas. The goal is to guide groups through a praxis of purposeful action by starting with the context, using tight iterative cycles, and applying constraints to spur novel solutions. The overall approach emphasizes reflection, abstraction, displacement of ideas, and experimentation to solve complex problems in a collaborative way.
CBODN 2013 unleashing results in groups tackling wicked problems
This document discusses tools and techniques for enabling shared understanding and commitment in groups tackling complex problems. It outlines two types of problems - tame problems which are well-defined, and wicked problems which are ambiguous and have many interdependencies. For wicked problems, it is important to have discussions involving all stakeholders to develop a full understanding of their complexity. The document then describes how bringing a group together in person can help surface both commonalities and differences in perspectives. It presents tools such as sticky notes, graphic recording and dialogue mapping that can help build shared language, displays, values, ownership and understanding to achieve breakthrough results.
IDp Lab 2010 3 Assignment
The document outlines the process and goals for Assignment 3 of a design course. It involves generating collaborative ideas and scenarios for improving a local bodega. The process involves brainstorming, developing an affinity map and mental map to organize ideas, building a draft scenario, gathering feedback on the scenario from community stakeholders, and revising the scenario based on that feedback. Tools mentioned include brainstorming, affinity mapping, concept mapping, scenario building with posters and cards, and directed interviews. The outcomes are a final scenario poster and presentation outlining the methods used.
IDp Lab/Co-operative 2010 Assignment 3
The document outlines the process and goals for Assignment 3 of a design course. It involves generating collaborative ideas and scenarios for improving a local bodega. The process involves brainstorming, developing an affinity map and mental map to organize ideas, building a draft scenario, gathering feedback on the scenario from community members, and revising the scenario based on that feedback. Tools mentioned include brainstorming, affinity mapping, concept mapping, scenario building with posters and cards, and directed interviews. The outcomes are a final scenario poster and presentation explaining the methods used.
Social Entrepreneurship and Undergraduate Research
Slides for keynote on social entrepreneurship at undergraduate research from the ACA UNC Asheville Symposium on Undergraduate Research
The future of work v1
A comprehensive exploration of an operating next-generation organization.
Core founding assumptions
Vision & Values
Culture is key .. wirearchy as opposed to hierarchy
Practical operational aspects
Naava Frank: Learning Communities for Professional
This document discusses learning communities and communities of practice (CoPs) as tools for professional development. It defines key aspects of CoPs, including that they are groups of professionals who systematically share expertise to improve their practice. The document then outlines three core processes that learning communities use: surfacing questions/needs, building connections, and eliciting tacit knowledge. Specific techniques are provided for each process.
Social machines: theory design and incentives
Social machines utilize human and technological components to solve problems at a scale not possible by either alone. This document provides an overview of social machines and citizen science projects, which are a type of social machine. It discusses key aspects of designing social machines and citizen science projects, including how to structure tasks, engage contributors, validate responses, and foster online communities. The goal is to better understand what makes social machines and citizen science initiatives successful.
Asean
This document discusses the field of human-computer interaction for development (HCI4D) and proposes a maturity model for evaluating approaches in this area. The model outlines 8 stages from isolation to transmutation, where the latter stage involves people from different cultures drawing on unique skills and backgrounds to solve problems in collaborative ways not possible within a single culture. The document advocates bringing diverse perspectives to problem solving and provides examples showing how mixed groups tend to be more creative and innovative. It argues that representations and ways of thinking become habitual, but exposing problems to varied representations from different cultures could lead to insights not found within one approach.
Dr. Ahmad, origin ontology of future scenario's idea, 3
Environmental changes coupled with the impact on globalization leading to increasing complexity in many developing strategies, especially on the foresight and futures studies. These trends pose a fundamental question, what is the chalenges of future’s complexity? It seems before understanding the origin of Future Scenario's idea and laws governing the Future Time, we've gone into the application of Scenarios to build better stories about future.
In this paper we deeply investigated following issues in order to demonstrate the effects of the origin of idea's ontology on Future Scenarios;
1. Idea ontology,
2. The origin of creative thinking,
3. Idea nurturing in organizations,
4. Shaping the future time,
5. Scenario planning,
6. Ideas social network (global brain).
This paper is a fundamental research type that makes theory for an applied science. In fact, we seek to bridge an ontology base with an applied knowledge. According to qualitative approach this study because of its data references to valid resources is valid and due to expert's continuous supervisions is reliable.
Conceptual Model that have been emerged from this investigation, shows how we can improve scenario planning ability and what actually should be done to have good scenarios.
Presentation designingnon routineknowledgeworkfinal
This document discusses the shifting nature of knowledge work and how to design systems to support non-routine knowledge work.
It notes that knowledge work has become more virtual, distributed, and interdependent across multiple organizations due to technology and globalization. Effective design principles focus on shared purpose, autonomy, learning, and flexibility through minimum specifications that allow for ongoing adaptation.
Contexts for design include vertically integrated organizations, decentralized networks, and issue-based ecosystems. Key elements are coordinating systems to facilitate deliberations among participants from varied perspectives and build shared knowledge. Design approaches differ based on the type of knowledge work from breakthrough innovations to optimization, with varying levels of uncertainty and coordination complexity.
Effective Strategies for Addressing Public Issues
This document summarizes a presentation by Scott Hutcheson on developing effective strategies for addressing public issues. The presentation explores factors that contribute to successful strategies, including having a network structure, using an asset-based framework, an iterative planning process, and decentralized implementation. Survey results of strategy participants showed a positive correlation between effectiveness and these factors, such as network structures and building on assets. The presentation provides recommendations for improving strategies, such as reframing issues as opportunities and accelerating collaborations.
Effective Strategy for Addressing Public Issues
These are slides from a session I am doing at the Joint Council of Extension Professionals 2014 Public Issues Leadership Workshop on April 7 in Alexandria, VA.
De Liddo & Buckingham Shum ipp2014
- The document discusses models of collective intelligence and challenges in designing systems to support collective intelligence when dealing with complex problems.
- It describes how argument mapping tools can help address issues like lack of insight into logical structures, poor idea evaluation, and shallow contributions that hamper online debates.
- A case study discussed how an argument mapping tool called LiteMap was used to collaboratively map discussions on an online platform about sustainable living. Mappers found the process challenging, especially for ill-defined topics.
Christchurch - a leadership incubator? Dec 2014
A presentation exploring innovative approaches to leadership, inter-agency collaboration and government - community partnership emerging in post-quake Christchurch
Similar to Dialogic Design for Foresight : DwD Workshop (20)
Horizontal Leadership Managing Change And Complexity Eng 2009
Horizontal Leadership Managing Change And Complexity Eng 2009
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from There to Here: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from There to Here: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Getting from Here to There: Eight Characteristics of Effective Economic & Com...
Facilitating Complexity: Methods & Mindsets for Exploration
Facilitating Complexity: Methods & Mindsets for Exploration
CBODN 2013 unleashing results in groups tackling wicked problems
CBODN 2013 unleashing results in groups tackling wicked problems
Social Entrepreneurship and Undergraduate Research
Social Entrepreneurship and Undergraduate Research
Naava Frank: Learning Communities for Professional
Naava Frank: Learning Communities for Professional
Dr. Ahmad, origin ontology of future scenario's idea, 3
Dr. Ahmad, origin ontology of future scenario's idea, 3
Presentation designingnon routineknowledgeworkfinal
Presentation designingnon routineknowledgeworkfinal
More from Peter Jones
Flourishing Societies Framework - DwD Workshop
How might we move or collective thinking and action beyond single-issue social action?
Does it make sense to build our urban worlds and future societies by winning one political issue at a time?
Can we design civic business models for our cities and society?
All social services, determinants of health, and economics are complex and interrelated. So why do we expect any political body or activist group to get it right? Only meaningfully diverse, multi-stakeholder groups can envision the variety of interests and outcomes in complex social systems. In February's Design with Dialogue Peter Jones workshops tools for co-creating civic design proposals.
A significant design challenge of our time is anticipating the relationships of multiple environmental and social problems as a complex system of nonlinear relationships. However, we cannot think about, model or discuss the relationships well, especially in the heat of discussion with deliberative groups and decision making processes. We need not only better engagement and dialogue processes for citizen deliberative problem solving, we require relevant tools.
With the OCADU Strongly Sustainable Business Model Group and with Strategic Foresight & Innovation students we designed a relevant framework from the common language of business model tools, adapted for civic decision models for flourishing cities and settlements.
The Flourishing Cities framework adapts a design tool for strongly sustainable business models as a visual organizer for engaging stakeholders in co-creating normative operational guidance for civic groups, community planners, and local governments. Flourishing can be understood as “to live within an optimal range of human functioning, one that connotes goodness, generativity, growth, and resilience,” or as John Ehrenfeld states it:
“Flourishing is the possibility that human and other life will flourish on this planet forever.”
This visual model enables a participatory mapping of propositions, values, and preferences that might yield significantly better group decisions for sociocultural and ecological development and governance in any planning engagement.
Designing Flourishing Societies RSD4
Presentation by Peter Jones at RSD4 Banff, Alberta, 2015. Society can be defined as an object of culture, as culture is a medium for the collective development of social systems. Societies are not designed by a deliberative process, but are social entities that emerge over time as response to historicity and cultural development, and function largely by tacit agreement as observed in social norms.
In the 1960’s social systemicists such as Ozbekhan, Fuller, and Doxiadis advocated deliberative civic planning as a normative science for designing sustainable and preferable societies and settlements. Even though their original methodologies of normative planning (Ozbekhan), anticipatory design science (Fuller) and ekistics (Doxiadis) did not gain the results hoped in applications over time, these arguments could be lodged against most systems methodologies. Yet when we consider their views of the human capacity to design future outcomes as a serious social and political project, we in our fragmented polities in the postmodern era might take heed. An argument follows that we, as cultural innovators in our own societies, having access to the wisdom of successful past transitions or redirections, have also failed to motivate and enact changes requisite to our common concerns.
A systemic design approach is proposed toward constructing such idealizations as a necessary initial condition. The approach reconciles wisdom from our sociocultural histories with collaborative design practices of the current era to construct shared pathways to desired and feasible societal futures.
The Flourishing Cities Framework Systemic Civil Planning for an Urban Busin...
Workshop at Urban Ecologies 2015. Today’s participatory design workshop is to learn and employ the Flourishing Cities canvas as a system map for designing civil governance processes. The Flourishing Cities framework adapts a design tool for constructing strongly sustainable business models as a visual organizer for engaging stakeholders in co-creating values-centred operational guidance for urban planners and local governments.
This is based on research work developed from OCADU sLab Strongly Sustainable Business Model group as applied to the flourishing of cities and settlements.
Systemic Design Principles & Methods (Royal College of Art)
For a guest lecture for Qian Sun and the RCA Service Design program, April 29, 2015, Talk based on the 10 shared design principles for complex social systems, related to the 2014 paper: https://ocad.academia.edu/PeterJones and http://designdialogues.com/publications/
Artifacts for the Systemic Design of Flourishing Enterprises - OCADU Research
Human commerce utilizes the most significant share of natural resources and produces the largest aggregate impact on the earth’s environment. As a consequence of modern employment and work cultures, commerce, corporations as opposed to governments, also construct much of the social contract and social organizational forms in developed societies. Sustainable development movements to conserve resources and to democratize or enhance organizational practices have called for culture change or transformation. However, these approaches have not yielded results that will significantly enhance human flourishing in the face of globalized commerce, which has no common governance system. We suggest that the goals of alignment toward sustainable development or so-called corporate sustainability are misguided and systemically depreciative, as they purport to sustain activities that foreseeably accelerate ecological degradation. We propose a modeling practice for stakeholder design of strongly sustainable enterprises for the intention of whole system flourishing across living ecosystems and organized social systems. This systemic design approach to business transformation functions at the level of the business model. We claim that business model design affords the highest leverage across all modes of organizing for collective cultural adoption ecosystemic practices.
Media Ecology - Technogenic Cultures
Media Ecology Association, Toronto, June 20, 2014
“We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us” John Culkin, SJ
Technogenic cultures, such as ours, demonstrate tightly-coupled economic systems with cultural production. This has become a self-reinforcing societal process, where the production of technological efficiencies becomes an inviolable social good desirable as product of culture.
Medlove 2012 Berlin: Design for Community Care
The document discusses designing healthcare systems with a focus on community and patient-centered care. It argues that real care occurs within communities and caring requires knowing individuals and their contexts. It advocates rethinking healthcare design to see people as health-seekers rather than patients and designing care that is distributed across various points of connection within communities. The document also discusses skills needed for healthcare design, including systems thinking, stakeholder collaboration, and participatory research.
ISSS Language-Action Perspective Basics
The document discusses the Language/Action Perspective and its key concepts, history, and applications. It covers:
- Colin Cherry's definition of communication as the exchange of meanings between social participants to create understanding.
- The Language-Action Perspective conceived of conversations as coordinating actions between individuals through requests, agreements, and accounting for promises.
- Software embodiments of the Language-Action Perspective included the Coordinator system in 1986 and Orchestrator Mail in 2010 to facilitate conversations for action through commitments.
Values Sensitive Innovation
The document discusses values and conflicts in innovation processes. It provides examples of where values tensions can arise in products and services. It also examines how organizational values change as companies grow, which can prevent strategic innovation. Innovation processes are explored, noting where official processes differ from actual practices due to values conflicts. The document aims to identify values as root causes of issues to enable more conscious design of products, services and innovation processes.
Design with Dialogue: Conversation & Dialogue
Presents a model of the meaning and intent of conversation as expressed and received. Distinguishes the purposes and practices of conversation and dialogue as intentional communication.
Collaborating for Complexity: SIUC Synergetics
Fuller said: “Humanity will overcome complexity through design science.” But we will never 'overcome' complexity. We will navigate it by collaborative design.
But the problem is, we really do not collaborate well. We need more than methods - we need cultural change, and to disrupt the way we think about problem solving.
Dialogue & Collective Sensemaking
The document discusses sensemaking as the process of understanding ambiguous situations and establishing situational awareness to make decisions. It defines sensemaking from both textbook and expert perspectives. It then discusses different contexts where sensemaking occurs, including at the individual, organizational, and societal levels. Finally, it outlines different models and methodologies for studying sensemaking, emphasizing the need to understand complex problems and situations before designing interventions.
Transforming Contexts: UC DAAP talk, May 8, 2009
Design Research - Techniques for Transforming the Context.
While the processes and perspectives collectively referred to as “design thinking” have evolved progressively in the last 10 years, research methodology has not demonstrably changed in the same period. Design research has continued to add new methods to its roster of adopted tools, but do methods and tools collectively contribute to a new whole greater than the sum of the methods?
We can observe a movement toward design contexts for organizational and social setting, which have been framed as Design 3.0 and now Design 4.0, by NextD. One way to understand the difference in design applications is by reconsidering the way we understand and make sense of design opportunities in this perspective. What are the appropriate research methodologies that account for observations about the targets of Design 3.0? These might include the larger system within which a service is conceived, the organizational context, social systems with multiple stakeholders, large-scale information ecologies with multiple emergent participants. We continue to study pieces of the problem, with user research, ethnography, participatory design research, smart sampling, trend analysis. But why have we not adopted methods from other disciplines that also contribute within the systems we intend to transform? Peter will present models and perspectives relating research methods and sensemaking approaches that bring the power of contextual understanding and collaborative problem solving to these organizational and social frames of design.
Designing with Dialogue: Questions
The document discusses leadership and framing questions. It notes that big, open questions that invite participation can profoundly change a discussion. Examples of "how" questions and "yes" questions are provided. The document outlines an exercise for groups to consider situations by asking questions. Key values for vision and participation in organizations are listed. The group's question is "What questions inspire shared leadership?". A technique for generating ideas called the Nominal Group Technique is described.
PDC 2008 Toward participatory organizations.
Presentation for paper: Socialization of practice in a process world: Toward participatory organizations. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference 2008, Indiana University, Oct 1-4 2008.
Designing with Dialogue 2: Open Space
This presentation guided the second session of the Toronto Designing with Dialogue series. The workshops are practice oriented, so the lecture portion is deliberately minimal.
Designing with Dialogue
This document outlines an agenda for a dialogue on designing with dialogue at the Strategic Innovation Lab on September 15, 2008. The agenda includes sections for participants to introduce themselves, share a recent work challenge involving communication, and discuss why designing with dialogue is important. It notes that complex problems are larger than any individual, collective wisdom is needed for design, organizations themselves are complex problems, isolated solutions are insufficient, stakeholders must own transformation initiatives, and diverse viewpoints and needs must be considered in design.
Dialogic Design for the Intelligent Enterprise
The document discusses the concept of the "intelligent enterprise" and the need for strategic planning and transformation to adapt to uncertainty. It proposes that structured dialogic design is a better method for collaborative strategic planning, consensus building, and transformation among diverse stakeholders compared to traditional top-down analytical methods. Examples are provided of how structured dialogic design has been successfully used for complex problem solving, policy design, and strategic planning for organizations and governments.
More from Peter Jones (18)
The Flourishing Cities Framework Systemic Civil Planning for an Urban Busin...
The Flourishing Cities Framework Systemic Civil Planning for an Urban Busin...
Systemic Design Principles & Methods (Royal College of Art)
Systemic Design Principles & Methods (Royal College of Art)
Artifacts for the Systemic Design of Flourishing Enterprises - OCADU Research
Artifacts for the Systemic Design of Flourishing Enterprises - OCADU Research
Recently uploaded
From Teacher to OnlyFans: Brianna Coppage's Story at 28
At 28, Brianna Coppage left her teaching career to become an OnlyFans content creator. This bold move into digital entrepreneurship allowed her to harness her creativity and build a new identity. Brianna's experience highlights the intersection of technology and personal branding in today's economy.
Divertidamente SLIDE muito lindo e criativo, pptx
Slide criativo e muito lindo, apenas editar, muito simples
The Gallery of Shadows, In the heart of a bustling city
In the heart of a bustling city, hidden away from the modern chaos …
created with AI assistance…
The Enigmatic Portrait, In the heart of a sleepy town
In the heart of a sleepy town nestled between rolling hills and whispering pines …
created with AI assistance…
定制(uow毕业证书)卧龙岗大学毕业证文凭学位证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(uow毕业证书)卧龙岗大学毕业证文凭学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Abraham Laboriel Records ‘The Bass Walk’ at Evergreen Stage
A legendary musician records an intricate song designed to show off his expert bass guitar chops at a historical Los Angeles studio.
原版制作(Mercer毕业证书)摩斯大学毕业证在读证明一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(Mercer毕业证书)摩斯大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
DIGIDEVTV A New area of OTT Distribution
At Digidev, we are working to be the leader in interactive streaming platforms of choice by smart device users worldwide.
Our goal is to become the ultimate distribution service of entertainment content. The Digidev application will offer the next generation television highway for users to discover and engage in a variety of content. While also providing a fresh and
innovative approach towards advertainment with vast revenue opportunities. Designed and developed by Joe Q. Bretz
一比一原版(AUT毕业证)奥克兰理工大学毕业证如何办理
AUT毕业证假文凭【微信95270640】购买（奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单硕士学历）Q微信95270640代办AUT学历认证留信网伪造奥克兰理工大学学位证书精仿奥克兰理工大学本科/硕士文凭证书补办奥克兰理工大学 diplomaoffer,Transcript购买奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单购买AUT假毕业证学位证书购买伪造奥克兰理工大学文凭证书学位证书,专业办理雅思、托福成绩单，学生ID卡，在读证明，海外各大学offer录取通知书，毕业证书，成绩单，文凭等材料:1:1完美还原毕业证、offer录取通知书、学生卡等各种在读或毕业材料的防伪工艺（包括 烫金、烫银、钢印、底纹、凹凸版、水印、防伪光标、热敏防伪、文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感光标）学校原版上有的工艺我们一样不会少，不论是老版本还是最新版本，都能保证最高程度还原，力争完美以求让所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
办国外奥克兰理工大学奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭证书教育部学历学位认证留信认证大使馆认证留学回国人员证明修改成绩单信封申请学校offer录取通知书在读证明offer letter。
快速办理高仿国外毕业证成绩单：
1奥克兰理工大学毕业证+成绩单+留学回国人员证明+教育部学历认证（全套留学回国必备证明材料给父母及亲朋好友一份完美交代）;
2雅思成绩单托福成绩单OFFER在读证明等留学相关材料（申请学校转学甚至是申请工签都可以用到）。
3.毕业证 #成绩单等全套材料从防伪到印刷从水印到钢印烫金高精仿度跟学校原版100%相同。
专业服务请勿犹豫联系我！联系人微信号：95270640诚招代理：本公司诚聘当地代理人员如果你有业余时间有兴趣就请联系我们。
国外奥克兰理工大学奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭证书办理过程：
1客户提供办理信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）。蜿蜒小溪一直都是山娃和小伙伴们盛夏的天然泳场水不深碎石底石缝里总有摸不尽的鱼虾活蹦乱跳的还有乌龟和王八贼头贼脑的倒也逗人喜爱日上三竿时山娃总爱窜进自家瓜棚里跟小伙伴们坐着聊天聊着聊着便忍不住往瓜田里逡巡一番抱起一只硕大的西瓜用石刀劈开抑或用拳头砸开每人抱起一大块就啃啃得满嘴满脸猴屁股般的红艳大家一个劲地指着对方吃吃地笑瓜裂得古怪奇形怪状却丝毫不影响瓜味甜丝丝的满嘴生津遍地都是瓜横七竖八的活像掷满这
The Evolution of the Leonardo DiCaprio Haircut: A Journey Through Style and C...
Leonardo DiCaprio, a name synonymous with Hollywood stardom and acting excellence. has captivated audiences for decades with his talent and charisma. But, the Leonardo DiCaprio haircut is one aspect of his public persona that has garnered attention. From his early days as a teenage heartthrob to his current status as a seasoned actor and environmental activist. DiCaprio's hairstyles have evolved. reflecting both his personal growth and the changing trends in fashion. This article delves into the many phases of the Leonardo DiCaprio haircut. exploring its significance and impact on pop culture.
Orpah Winfrey Dwayne Johnson: Titans of Influence and Inspiration
Introduction
In the realm of entertainment, few names resonate as Orpah Winfrey Dwayne Johnson. Both figures have carved unique paths in the industry. achieving unparalleled success and becoming iconic symbols of perseverance, resilience, and inspiration. This article delves into the lives, careers. and enduring legacies of Orpah Winfrey Dwayne Johnson. exploring how their journeys intersect and what we can learn from their remarkable stories.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Early Life and Backgrounds
Orpah Winfrey: From Humble Beginnings to Media Mogul
Orpah Winfrey, often known as Oprah due to a misspelling on her birth certificate. was born on January 29, 1954, in Kosciusko, Mississippi. Raised in poverty by her grandmother, Winfrey's early life was marked by hardship and adversity. Despite these challenges. she demonstrated a keen intellect and an early talent for public speaking.
Winfrey's journey to success began with a scholarship to Tennessee State University. where she studied communication. Her first job in media was as a co-anchor for the local evening news in Nashville. This role paved the way for her eventual transition to talk show hosting. where she found her true calling.
Dwayne Johnson: From Wrestling Royalty to Hollywood Superstar
Dwayne Johnson, also known by his ring name "The Rock," was born on May 2, 1972, in Hayward, California. He comes from a family of professional wrestlers, with both his father, Rocky Johnson. and his grandfather, Peter Maivia, being notable figures in the wrestling world. Johnson's early life was spent moving between New Zealand and the United States. experiencing a variety of cultural influences.
Before entering the world of professional wrestling. Johnson had aspirations of becoming a professional football player. He played college football at the University of Miami. where he was part of a national championship team. But, injuries curtailed his football career, leading him to follow in his family's footsteps and enter the wrestling ring.
Career Milestones
Orpah Winfrey: The Queen of All Media
Winfrey's career breakthrough came in 1986 when she launched "The Oprah Winfrey Show." The show became a cultural phenomenon. drawing millions of viewers daily and earning many awards. Winfrey's empathetic and candid interviewing style resonated with audiences. helping her tackle diverse and often challenging topics.
Beyond her talk show, Winfrey expanded her empire to include the creation of Harpo Productions. a multimedia production company. She also launched "O, The Oprah Magazine" and OWN: Oprah Winfrey Network, further solidifying her status as a media mogul.
Dwayne Johnson: From The Ring to The Big Screen
Dwayne Johnson's wrestling career took off in the late 1990s. when he became one of the most charismatic and popular figures in WWE. His larger-than-life persona and catchphrases endeared him to fans. making him a household name. But, Johnson had ambitions beyond the wrestling ring.
In the early 20
From Swing Music to Big Band Fame_ 5 Iconic Artists.pptx
Know about the five famous artists who have transitioned to Big Band Music from Swing Music. Here is a glimpse of their work and contributions.
Authenticity in Motion Pictures: How Steve Greisen Retains Real Stories
Learn about Steve Greisen's dedication to capture the spirit of his subjects in his documentaries with honesty and integrity.
Christian Louboutin: Innovating with Red Soles
Christian Louboutin is celebrated for his innovative approach to footwear design, marked by his trademark red soles. This in-depth look at his life and career explores the origins of his creativity, the milestones in his journey, and the impact of his work on the fashion industry. Learn how Louboutin's bold vision and dedication to excellence have made his brand synonymous with luxury and style.
Barbie Movie Review - The Astras.pdfffff
Barbie Movie Review has gotten brilliant surveys for its fun and creative story. Coordinated by Greta Gerwig, it stars Margot Robbie as Barbie and Ryan Gosling as Insight. Critics adore its perky humor, dynamic visuals, and intelligent take on the notorious doll's world. It's lauded for being engaging for both kids and grown-ups. The Astras profoundly prescribes observing the Barbie Review for a delightful and colorful cinematic involvement.https://theastras.com/hca-member-gradebooks/hca-gradebook-barbie/
The Future of Independent Filmmaking Trends and Job Opportunities
The landscape of independent filmmaking is evolving at an unprecedented pace. Technological advancements, changing consumer preferences, and new distribution models are reshaping the industry, creating new opportunities and challenges for filmmakers and film industry jobs. This article explores the future of independent filmmaking, highlighting key trends and emerging job opportunities.
The Unbelievable Tale of Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping: A Riveting Saga
Introduction
The notion of Dwayne Johnson kidnapping seems straight out of a Hollywood thriller. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, known for his larger-than-life persona, immense popularity. and action-packed filmography, is the last person anyone would envision being a victim of kidnapping. Yet, the bizarre and riveting tale of such an incident, filled with twists and turns. has captured the imagination of many. In this article, we delve into the intricate details of this astonishing event. exploring every aspect, from the dramatic rescue operation to the aftermath and the lessons learned.
Follow us on: Pinterest
The Origins of the Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping Saga
Dwayne Johnson: A Brief Background
Before discussing the specifics of the kidnapping. it is crucial to understand who Dwayne Johnson is and why his kidnapping would be so significant. Born May 2, 1972, Dwayne Douglas Johnson is an American actor, producer, businessman. and former professional wrestler. Known by his ring name, "The Rock," he gained fame in the World Wrestling Federation (WWF, now WWE) before transitioning to a successful career in Hollywood.
Johnson's filmography includes blockbuster hits such as "The Fast and the Furious" series, "Jumanji," "Moana," and "San Andreas." His charismatic personality, impressive physique. and action-star status have made him a beloved figure worldwide. Thus, the news of his kidnapping would send shockwaves across the globe.
Setting the Scene: The Day of the Kidnapping
The incident of Dwayne Johnson's kidnapping began on an ordinary day. Johnson was filming his latest high-octane action film set to break box office records. The location was a remote yet scenic area. chosen for its rugged terrain and breathtaking vistas. perfect for the film's climactic scenes.
But, beneath the veneer of normalcy, a sinister plot was unfolding. Unbeknownst to Johnson and his team, a group of criminals had planned his abduction. hoping to leverage his celebrity status for a hefty ransom. The stage was set for an event that would soon dominate worldwide headlines and social media feeds.
The Abduction: Unfolding the Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping
The Moment of Capture
On the day of the kidnapping, everything seemed to be proceeding as usual on set. Johnson and his co-stars and crew were engrossed in shooting a particularly demanding scene. As the day wore on, the production team took a short break. providing the kidnappers with the perfect opportunity to strike.
The abduction was executed with military precision. A group of masked men, armed and organized, infiltrated the set. They created chaos, taking advantage of the confusion to isolate Johnson. Johnson was outnumbered and caught off guard despite his formidable strength and fighting skills. The kidnappers overpowered him, bundled him into a waiting vehicle. and sped away, leaving everyone on set in a state of shock and disbelief.
The Immediate Aftermath
The immediate aftermath of the Dwayne Johnson kidnappin
Top IPTV UK Providers of A Comprehensive Review.pdf
The television landscape in the UK has evolved significantly with the rise of Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). IPTV offers a modern alternative to traditional cable and satellite TV, allowing viewers to stream live TV, on-demand videos, and other multimedia content directly to their devices over the internet. This review provides an in-depth look at the top IPTV UK providers, their features, pricing, and what sets them apart.
原版制作(MUN毕业证书)纽芬兰纪念大学毕业证PDF成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(MUN毕业证书)纽芬兰纪念大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Recently uploaded (20)
From Teacher to OnlyFans: Brianna Coppage's Story at 28
From Teacher to OnlyFans: Brianna Coppage's Story at 28
The Gallery of Shadows, In the heart of a bustling city
The Gallery of Shadows, In the heart of a bustling city
The Enigmatic Portrait, In the heart of a sleepy town
The Enigmatic Portrait, In the heart of a sleepy town
Abraham Laboriel Records ‘The Bass Walk’ at Evergreen Stage
Abraham Laboriel Records ‘The Bass Walk’ at Evergreen Stage
The Evolution of the Leonardo DiCaprio Haircut: A Journey Through Style and C...
The Evolution of the Leonardo DiCaprio Haircut: A Journey Through Style and C...
Orpah Winfrey Dwayne Johnson: Titans of Influence and Inspiration
Orpah Winfrey Dwayne Johnson: Titans of Influence and Inspiration
From Swing Music to Big Band Fame_ 5 Iconic Artists.pptx
From Swing Music to Big Band Fame_ 5 Iconic Artists.pptx
Authenticity in Motion Pictures: How Steve Greisen Retains Real Stories
Authenticity in Motion Pictures: How Steve Greisen Retains Real Stories
The Future of Independent Filmmaking Trends and Job Opportunities
The Future of Independent Filmmaking Trends and Job Opportunities
The Unbelievable Tale of Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping: A Riveting Saga
The Unbelievable Tale of Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping: A Riveting Saga
Top IPTV UK Providers of A Comprehensive Review.pdf
Top IPTV UK Providers of A Comprehensive Review.pdf
Dialogic Design for Foresight : DwD Workshop
- 1. Imagining Future Urban PAIN CONSULT Concept design workshop Challenges A Dialogic Design Workshop Peter Jones, OCAD University Sept 12, 2012
- 2. Imagining Canada’s Future 2030 Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council • Across Canada - 6 Regional panel sessions OCADU led with York, Ryerson, UOIT, Windsor • Based on large foresight / scan project “Shaping Tomorrow” 3500 trends, 70K insights, initial set > 200 trends • We proposed a focused panel on a well-framed issue to derive challenges in response to a single major trend: Urbanization • 18 members selected from S. Ontario for STEEP/CI + diversity Requisite Variety
- 4. Requisite Variety Sampling approach based on Ashby’s systems principle • STEEP CI Criteria: Social, Technology, Economy, Ecology, Political, Culture / Intellect • Diversity: Age cohort, Academic, Professional, ethnicity, gender • Smaller groups that meet stricter stakeholder criteria • Invested in the future problem, sufficient care, action
- 5. Structured Dialogic Design • “Co-laboratory of Democracy” approach – Strongly democratic • Multi-staged, progressive reasoning process • Cogniscope software (Root Cause Mapping) • Multi-Facilitated • Canonical, rigorous • Guides dialogue toward effective action • Employed as action research • Well published in social & systems literatures
- 6. Democratic - For complexity & power • Cyprus Reunification Dialogues (1990 – 2011) EU project for Israeli-Palestinian dialogues • WHO Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis Partners, Clinicians, Villagers & Pharma from multiple agencies (1999) • Transnational Indigenous Leaders Dialogue on Globalization: 40 Indigenous leaders from Americas and New Zealand & experts • US Forest Service - Forest Service Priority Setting (2003) • Alternative Energy Future Planning, Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance
- 7. Diagnosing Problematique 1 Deliberative co-created design of 2 an envisioned social system 3
- 12. Constructing Challenges into Influence Map
- 13. ICF Influence Map – 12 Challenges
- 14. Resolves Groupthink • “When concurrence-seeking becomes so dominant in a cohesive in- group that it tends to override realistic appraisal of alternative courses of action. (Janis, 1971) • Spreadthink: Unable to reach any genuine consensus, or even majority view toward component aspects of a complex issue • Clanthink: When like groups maintain concurrence within group • Linkthink: When people “link” like ideas in concurrence Warfield: “Facilitators who try to bring groups to a consensus without the aid of some methodology that resolves the difficulties caused by Spreadthink may well be driving the group to Groupthink, and thus helping to arrive at a decision that lacks individual support and, usually, lacks substance.
- 15. Triggering Question Triggering Question “In the face of increasing urbanization worldwide, what future challenges do we anticipate for Southern Ontario, now through 2030?" Clarify the meaning, and co-create the TQ so we own it as a group.
- 16. Generation Triggering Question “In the face of increasing urbanization worldwide, what future challenges do we anticipate for Southern Ontario, now through 2030?" Your response: Write 3 challenge statements on single sheet. Short phrase that distills the essence of a complex problem as a challenge Not a solution “create alternative transportation systems” Or an outcome “Better regional government” Pair up & workshop all 3, & refine. Then read one each in turn. Write your chosen challenge (or 2) one per sheet and post.
- 17. Rapid Clarification Triggering Question Read one challenge, in turn around circle. Questions for clarification – quickly – taken in this round.
- 18. Clustering Challenges Triggering Question Group of 4-5 – Go to wall & cluster together / name categories Group 1 - 5 Minutes Group 2 – 4 Minutes Group 3 – 3 Minutes Group 4 – 2 Minutes Based on Delphi & iterative refinement.
- 19. Voting Triggering Question Mark an X on up to 3 different challenges Order challenges in cluster by votes.
- 20. Scenarios Triggering Question Make 5 DIVERSE groups of 5-6 Each group selects one item from each category. You can copy! Construct at least one scenario describing the future relationship of these challenges, their co-evolution together & their possible resolutions. Position sheets in a narrative order Sketch images of the possible relationships, influences, outcomes Present each in 5 min rapid round