Details: This assignment requires you to interview one person and requires an analysis of your interview experience. Part I: Interview Select a patient, a family member, or a friend to interview. Be sure to focus on the interviewee's experience as a patient, regardless of whom you choose to interview. Review The Joint Commission resource found in topic materials, which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients. Using this resource and any other guidelines/examples that you can find, create your own tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients. Your spiritual needs assessment survey must include a minimum of five questions that can be answered during the interview. During the interview, document the interviewee's responses. The transcript should include the questions asked and the answers provided. Be sure to record the responses during the interview by taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and other personal information through which the interviewee can be determined. Part II: Analysis Write a 500-750 word analysis of your interview experience. Be sure to exclude specific names and other personal information from the interview. Instead, provide demographics such as sex, age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your response: What went well? Were there any barriers or challenges that inhibited your ability to complete the assessment tool? How would you address these in the future or change your assessment to better address these challenges? How can this tool assist you in providing appropriate interventions to meet the needs of your patient? Did you discover that illness and stress amplified the spiritual concern and needs of your interviewee? Explain your answer with examples. Submit both the transcript of the interview and the analysis of your results. This should be submitted as one document. The interview transcript does not figure into the word count. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. This benchmark assignment assesses the following competencies: CONHCP Program Competencies for the RN-BSN: 5.2 : Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups. Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00%3 Satisfactory 75.00%4 Good 85.00%5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content 40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2 Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no ...

1. Details:
This assignment requires you to interview one person and
requires an analysis of your interview experience.
Part I: Interview
Select a patient, a family member, or a friend to interview. Be
sure to focus on the interviewee's experience as a patient,
regardless of whom you choose to interview.
Review The Joint Commission resource found in topic
materials, which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual
assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients.
Using this resource and any other guidelines/examples that you
can find, create your own tool for assessing the spiritual needs
of patients.
Your spiritual needs assessment survey must include a minimum
of five questions that can be answered during the interview.
During the interview, document the interviewee's responses.
The transcript should include the questions asked and the
answers provided. Be sure to record the responses during the
interview by taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and
other personal information through which the interviewee can
be determined.
Part II: Analysis
Write a 500-750 word analysis of your interview experience. Be
sure to exclude specific names and other personal information
from the interview. Instead, provide demographics such as sex,

2. age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your
response:
What went well?
Were there any barriers or challenges that inhibited your ability
to complete the assessment tool? How would you address these
in the future or change your assessment to better address these
challenges?
How can this tool assist you in providing appropriate
interventions to meet the needs of your patient?
Did you discover that illness and stress amplified the spiritual
concern and needs of your interviewee? Explain your answer
with examples.
Submit both the transcript of the interview and the analysis of
your results. This should be submitted as one document. The
interview transcript does not figure into the word count.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An
abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following
competencies:

3. CONHCP Program Competencies for the RN-BSN:
5.2
: Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate
interventions for individuals, families, and groups.
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and
Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%3
Satisfactory
75.00%4
Good
85.00%5
Excellent
100.00%

4. 70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients
CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to
no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the
interview is either missing or not relevant.Tool for assessing the
spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on
experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is
provided.Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is
present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear
transcript of the interview is provided.Tool for assessing the
spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences
of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A
clear transcript of the interview is provided.Tool for assessing
the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on
experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for
gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear
transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no
relevance to the assignment instructions.An analysis of the
interview experience is included but addresses a few of the
points included in the assignment instructions.An analysis of
the interview experience is included and addresses most of the
points included in the assignment instructions.An analysis of
the interview experience is included and addresses all of the
points included in the assignment instructions.An analysis of
the interview experience is included and addresses all of the
points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis
shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed

5. and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are
apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim
are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are
descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to
the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The
essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis
statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification
of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are
obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable
credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few
inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of
claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the
purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion
bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progression.
Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth
progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument
presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling
manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or
sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical
errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the
reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-
appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer
uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of

6. speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written,
academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but
some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with
formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting
is correct, although some minor errors may be
present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually
no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and
style)
Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is
inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style,
with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting
errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are
completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage