Community Teaching Experience Students must submit this form as part of the assignment submission. Student Name:__________________ Course Section & Faculty Name:_____________________________ Date of Presentation:_____________ Provider Information Provider Name : Last First M.I. Credentials: Title: (i.e., MS, RN, etc.) Organization: Phone Number: E-mail Address: Student Presentation Information Type of Presentation: FORMCHECKBOX PowerPoint Presentation FORMCHECKBOX Pamphlet Presentation FORMCHECKBOX Audio Presentation FORMCHECKBOX Poster Presentation D Provider Acknowledgement I __________________________acknowledge that ____________________________ (Provider Name) (Student Name) has requested approval to participate in a community teaching experience at the location listed on this form. The organization / agency does not endorse the university or the student however, the teaching plan developed by the student is considered appropriate and of benefit to the community of interest. ______________________________ _________________ Provider Signature Date Signed Assignment 1 (Part I) Details: Note: This is an individual assignment. Based on the feedback offered by the provider, identify the best approach for teaching. Prepare a presentation to accompany the teaching plan and present the information to your community. Select one of the following options for delivery of the presentation: 1. PowerPoint presentation – no more than 30 minutes 2. Pamphlet presentation – 1 to 2 pages 3. Poster presentation Appropriate community settings include: · Public health clinic · Community health center · Long-term care facility · Transitional care facility · Home health center · University/School health center · Church community · Adult/Child care center Before presenting information to the community, seek approval from an agency administrator or representative. Upon receiving approval from the agency, include the "Community Teaching Experience Form" as part of your assignment submission. (Part II) Note: This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include: 1. Summary of teaching plan 2. Epidemiological rationale for topic 3. Evaluation of teaching experience 4. Community response to teaching 5. Areas of strengths and areas of improvement Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Rubric Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 83.00% 4 Good 94.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 80.0 %Content 30.0 %Comprehensive Summary of Teaching.

1. Community Teaching Experience
Students must submit this form as part of the assignment
submission.
Student Name:__________________
Course Section & Faculty
Name:_____________________________
Date of Presentation:_____________
Provider Information
Provider Name :
Last
First
M.I.
Credentials:
Title:
(i.e., MS, RN, etc.)
Organization:

2. Phone Number:
E-mail Address:
Student Presentation Information
Type of Presentation:
FORMCHECKBOX
PowerPoint Presentation
FORMCHECKBOX
Pamphlet Presentation
FORMCHECKBOX
Audio Presentation
FORMCHECKBOX
Poster Presentation
D
Provider Acknowledgement
I __________________________acknowledge that
____________________________
(Provider Name)
(Student Name)
has requested approval to participate in a community teaching
experience at the location listed on this form. The organization /
agency does not endorse the university or the student however,
the teaching plan developed by the student is considered
appropriate and of benefit to the community of interest.

3. ______________________________
_________________
Provider Signature
Date Signed
Assignment 1 (Part I)
Details:
Note: This is an individual assignment. Based on the feedback
offered by the provider, identify the best approach for teaching.
Prepare a presentation to accompany the teaching plan and
present the information to your community. Select one of the
following options for delivery of the presentation:
1. PowerPoint presentation – no more than 30 minutes
2. Pamphlet presentation – 1 to 2 pages
3. Poster presentation
Appropriate community settings include:
· Public health clinic
· Community health center
· Long-term care facility

4. · Transitional care facility
· Home health center
· University/School health center
· Church community
· Adult/Child care center
Before presenting information to the community, seek approval
from an agency administrator or representative.
Upon receiving approval from the agency, include the
"Community Teaching Experience Form" as part of your
assignment submission.
(Part II)
Note: This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words,
describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations.
The written portion of this assignment should include:
1. Summary of teaching plan
2. Epidemiological rationale for topic
3. Evaluation of teaching experience
4. Community response to teaching
5. Areas of strengths and areas of improvement
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found
in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
Rubric
Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2

5. Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan With
Epidemiological Rationale for Topic
Summary of community teaching plan is not identified or
missing.
Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete.
Summary of community teaching plan is offered but some
elements are vague.
Focus of community teaching is clear with a detailed summary
of each component. Rationale is not provided.
Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with
Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings and
supported by explanation of epidemiological rationale.
50.0 %Evaluation of Teaching Experience With Discussion of
Community Response to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength
and Areas of Improvement Described
Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete.
Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear and/or discussion
of community response to teaching is missing.
Evaluation of teaching experience is provided with a brief
discussion of community response to teaching.
A detailed evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of
community response to teaching and areas of

6. strength/improvement is provided.
Comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience with
discussion of community response provided along with a
detailed description of barriers and strategies to overcome
barriers is provided.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not
clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. It is
descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to
the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the
essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the
paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and
coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are
established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.
Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of
ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of
organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some
inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to
each other.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent.
Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic
sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and
transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph

7. and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure
is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or
sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly
distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
5.0 %Format
2.0 %Paper Format
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken;
lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and
direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment)

8. No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper.
Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors
may be present.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and style guide is usually
correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The
documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage