Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesi.
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docxtangyechloe
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis an.
Top of FormEvidence-Based Practice Project—Intervention Presen.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
Evidence-Based Practice Project—Intervention Presentation on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Summary of Article (Includes Discussion of Research Performed and Clinical Findings)
Content does not fulfill any of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Some of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria are present. Findings and/ or methods are described but flawed, unrealistic, irrelevant, and/or inaccurate.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research lacks relevance, quality, and/or innovation.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive and presents ideas and information beyond those presented through the course. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria.
60.0 %Proposed Integration of the New Tool or Intervention Into Practice, and Explanation of the Impact of the New Tool or Intervention on nursing practice.
Neither the integration nor the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated.
The integration into and the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated but not thoroughly explained. Presentation does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis.
The integration and impact of the new tool or intervention on the nursing practice are stated and explained. Presentation satisfactorily demonstrates understanding and analysis of the basic principles.
Statement is descriptive and reflective. Shows some planning and attention to how various components fit together, but essential elements are not present.
Statement is thorough, descriptive, reflective, and supported with practical and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together to impact the nursing profession.
30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Layout
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not ...
Details:
Complete "The VARK Questionnaire: How Do I Learn Best?"
http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/
Click "OK" to receive your questionnaire scores.
Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference.
Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Appraise how this awareness of learning attributes influences your perceptions of teaching and learning.
In a paper (750-1,000 words), summarize your analysis of this exercise. Include the following:
Provide a summary of your learning style.
List your preferred learning strategies.
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Discuss how the awareness of individual learning styles, preferences and strategies influence teaching (those who are in a position to teach) and learning (those who are in a position to learn).
Cite a minimum of three references in the paper.
Although the topic of this assignment refers to your individual learning style, avoid the use of first person voice (words such as, "I, we, our") in your essay.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
APPLY
RUBRIC
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %
Content
50.0 %
Personal Learning Style and Strategies
Personal learning style and learning strategies content is missing.
Personal learning style is identified, but summary is incomplete. Preferred learning strategies and personal learning style strategies are not compared. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Personal learning style is identified and basic summary is provided. Some preferred learning strategies are described and compared against those of the personal learning style. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 %
Perceptions of Learning and Teachi.
Details:
Complete "The VARK Questionnaire: How Do I Learn Best?"
http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/
Click "OK" to receive your questionnaire scores.
Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference.
Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Appraise how this awareness of learning attributes influences your perceptions of teaching and learning.
In a paper (750-1,000 words), summarize your analysis of this exercise. Include the following:
Provide a summary of your learning style.
List your preferred learning strategies.
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Discuss how the awareness of individual learning styles, preferences and strategies influence teaching (those who are in a position to teach) and learning (those who are in a position to learn).
Cite a minimum of three references in the paper.
Although the topic of this assignment refers to your individual learning style, avoid the use of first person voice (words such as, "I, we, our") in your essay.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
APPLY
RUBRIC
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %
Content
50.0 %
Personal Learning Style and Strategies
Personal learning style and learning strategies content is missing.
Personal learning style is identified, but summary is incomplete. Preferred learning strategies and personal learning style strategies are not compared. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Personal learning style is identified and basic summary is provided. Some preferred learning strategies are described and compared against those of the personal learning style. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 %
Perceptions of Learning and Teachi.
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docxAASTHA76
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but ...
DetailsBased on the summary of research findings identified fro.docxkhenry4
Details:
Based on the summary of research findings identified from the Evidence-Based Project—Paper on Diabetes that describes a new diagnostic tool or intervention for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children, complete the following components of this assignment:
Develop a PowerPoint presentation (a title slide, 6-12 slides, and a reference slide; no larger than 2 MB) that includes the following:
1. A brief summary of the research conducted in the Evidence-Based Project – Paper on Diabetes.
2. A descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention may be integrated into practice that is supported by sound research.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Summary of Article (Includes Discussion of Research Performed and Clinical Findings)
Content does not fulfill any of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Some of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria are present. Findings and/ or methods are described but flawed, unrealistic, irrelevant, and/or inaccurate.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research lacks relevance, quality, and/or innovation.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive and presents ideas and information beyond those presented through the course. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria.
60.0 %Proposed Integration of the New Tool or Intervention Into Practice, and Explanation of the Impact of the New Tool or Intervention on nursing practice.
Neither the integration nor the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated.
The integration into and the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated but not thoroughly explained. Presentation does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis.
The integration and impact of the new tool or intervention on the nursing practice are stated and explained. Presentation satisfactorily demonstrates understanding and analysis of the basic principles.
Statement is descriptive and reflective. Shows some planning and attention to how various components fit together, but essential elements are not present.
Statement is thorough, descriptive, reflective, and supported with practical and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together to impact the nursing profession.
30.0 %Organiza.
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docxmelbruce90096
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docxtangyechloe
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis an.
Top of FormEvidence-Based Practice Project—Intervention Presen.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
Evidence-Based Practice Project—Intervention Presentation on Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Summary of Article (Includes Discussion of Research Performed and Clinical Findings)
Content does not fulfill any of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Some of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria are present. Findings and/ or methods are described but flawed, unrealistic, irrelevant, and/or inaccurate.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research lacks relevance, quality, and/or innovation.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive and presents ideas and information beyond those presented through the course. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria.
60.0 %Proposed Integration of the New Tool or Intervention Into Practice, and Explanation of the Impact of the New Tool or Intervention on nursing practice.
Neither the integration nor the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated.
The integration into and the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated but not thoroughly explained. Presentation does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis.
The integration and impact of the new tool or intervention on the nursing practice are stated and explained. Presentation satisfactorily demonstrates understanding and analysis of the basic principles.
Statement is descriptive and reflective. Shows some planning and attention to how various components fit together, but essential elements are not present.
Statement is thorough, descriptive, reflective, and supported with practical and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together to impact the nursing profession.
30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Layout
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not ...
Details:
Complete "The VARK Questionnaire: How Do I Learn Best?"
http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/
Click "OK" to receive your questionnaire scores.
Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference.
Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Appraise how this awareness of learning attributes influences your perceptions of teaching and learning.
In a paper (750-1,000 words), summarize your analysis of this exercise. Include the following:
Provide a summary of your learning style.
List your preferred learning strategies.
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Discuss how the awareness of individual learning styles, preferences and strategies influence teaching (those who are in a position to teach) and learning (those who are in a position to learn).
Cite a minimum of three references in the paper.
Although the topic of this assignment refers to your individual learning style, avoid the use of first person voice (words such as, "I, we, our") in your essay.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
APPLY
RUBRIC
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %
Content
50.0 %
Personal Learning Style and Strategies
Personal learning style and learning strategies content is missing.
Personal learning style is identified, but summary is incomplete. Preferred learning strategies and personal learning style strategies are not compared. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Personal learning style is identified and basic summary is provided. Some preferred learning strategies are described and compared against those of the personal learning style. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 %
Perceptions of Learning and Teachi.
Details:
Complete "The VARK Questionnaire: How Do I Learn Best?"
http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/
Click "OK" to receive your questionnaire scores.
Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference.
Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Appraise how this awareness of learning attributes influences your perceptions of teaching and learning.
In a paper (750-1,000 words), summarize your analysis of this exercise. Include the following:
Provide a summary of your learning style.
List your preferred learning strategies.
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Discuss how the awareness of individual learning styles, preferences and strategies influence teaching (those who are in a position to teach) and learning (those who are in a position to learn).
Cite a minimum of three references in the paper.
Although the topic of this assignment refers to your individual learning style, avoid the use of first person voice (words such as, "I, we, our") in your essay.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
APPLY
RUBRIC
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %
Content
50.0 %
Personal Learning Style and Strategies
Personal learning style and learning strategies content is missing.
Personal learning style is identified, but summary is incomplete. Preferred learning strategies and personal learning style strategies are not compared. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Personal learning style is identified and basic summary is provided. Some preferred learning strategies are described and compared against those of the personal learning style. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 %
Perceptions of Learning and Teachi.
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection .docxAASTHA76
Benchmark Assignment - Spiritual Needs Assessment and Reflection
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients CONHCP: 5.2
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients show little to no relevance to the experiences of patients. A transcript of the interview is either missing or not relevant.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present but lacks focus on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for gathering data. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for gathering data that produces the results intended. A clear transcript of the interview is provided.
30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience
An analysis of the interview experience shows little to no relevance to the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses a few of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions.
An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but ...
DetailsBased on the summary of research findings identified fro.docxkhenry4
Details:
Based on the summary of research findings identified from the Evidence-Based Project—Paper on Diabetes that describes a new diagnostic tool or intervention for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children, complete the following components of this assignment:
Develop a PowerPoint presentation (a title slide, 6-12 slides, and a reference slide; no larger than 2 MB) that includes the following:
1. A brief summary of the research conducted in the Evidence-Based Project – Paper on Diabetes.
2. A descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention may be integrated into practice that is supported by sound research.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Summary of Article (Includes Discussion of Research Performed and Clinical Findings)
Content does not fulfill any of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Some of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria are present. Findings and/ or methods are described but flawed, unrealistic, irrelevant, and/or inaccurate.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research lacks relevance, quality, and/or innovation.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is comprehensive and presents ideas and information beyond those presented through the course. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria.
60.0 %Proposed Integration of the New Tool or Intervention Into Practice, and Explanation of the Impact of the New Tool or Intervention on nursing practice.
Neither the integration nor the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated.
The integration into and the impact of the new tool or intervention is stated but not thoroughly explained. Presentation does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis.
The integration and impact of the new tool or intervention on the nursing practice are stated and explained. Presentation satisfactorily demonstrates understanding and analysis of the basic principles.
Statement is descriptive and reflective. Shows some planning and attention to how various components fit together, but essential elements are not present.
Statement is thorough, descriptive, reflective, and supported with practical and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together to impact the nursing profession.
30.0 %Organiza.
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docxmelbruce90096
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
RubricsTop of FormCLC - Health Care Literacy Presentation .docxSUBHI7
Rubrics
Top of Form
CLC - Health Care Literacy Presentation
1
Unsatisfactory
59.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
30.0 %Selection of two strategies focused on health care literacy
Presentation does not incorporate two strategies focused on health care literacy.
Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy and information is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy and the information is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
35.0 %Development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community
Presentation does not incorporate the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community.
Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community and information is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community and the information is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
8.0 %Presentation of Content
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. Speaker notes are absent.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. Speaker notes are insufficient.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. Speaker notes are sufficient and clear.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable ...
Top of FormCoyne and Messina Articles, Part 3 Spearman Coefficie.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
Coyne and Messina Articles, Part 3 Spearman Coefficient Review
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Review of the Use of the Spearman Correlation Coefficient in the Article by Messina et al.
Failure to demonstrate the ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study.
Demonstrates only minimal ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study
Demonstrates ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study, but has some slight misunderstanding of the process and applications.
Demonstrates ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study (in student's own words).
Demonstrates clearly and fully the ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study (in the student's own words). Shows ability to think critically about the choice of the statistic.
30.0 %Integration of Information from Outside Resources into the Body of Paper
Failure to use references, examples, or explanations.
Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references included.
Supports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published references to support claims and ideas.
Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Analysis and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria.
Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully analyzes, evaluates, and describes major points of the criteria.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Assignment Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thorough ...
Top of Form 1VARK Analysis Paper 1Unsatisf.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form 1
VARK Analysis Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
50.0 % Personal Learning Style and Strategies
Personal learning style and learning strategies content is missing.
Personal learning style is identified, but summary is incomplete. Preferred learning strategies and personal learning style strategies are not compared. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Personal learning style is identified and basic summary is provided. Some preferred learning strategies are described and compared against those of the personal learning style. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 % Perceptions of Learning and Teaching
A discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is missing.
A discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is present, but may be incomplete, lack relevant information, or not meet assignment criteria. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
A basic discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is present and mostly relevant. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.
A detailed discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is offered. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.
A detailed discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is offered. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thes ...
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less Than Satisfactory65.003Sa.docxeugeniadean34240
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Students
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to students.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Parents
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to parents.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
15.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Teachers
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to teachers.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Informing Personal Classroom Management System
Does not include ways in which this informs a personal classroom management system.
Analysis of the implications of legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents for classroom management is sketchy and lacks depth of insight.
Essay contains an analysis of how legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents inform a personal classroom management system.
Analysis is clear and concisely presented.
Analysis draws specific conclusions about how these implications affect the student's personal classroom management system.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is in part or wholly incoherent.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.
Argument is strong, showing logical progressions. Firm control of the technique of argumentation is evident. Smooth progression of claims
The argument presents a clear, convincing and persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction,.
Top of FormBenchmark - Research Critique Part 1 1Unsatisfa.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
Benchmark - Research Critique Part 1
1
Unsatisfactory 0%-71%
71.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72%-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76%-83%
79.00%
4
Good 84%-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90% - 100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Research problem and purpose
Does not mention research problem or purpose of study.
There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem.
The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate.
The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing.
The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing addressed.
20.0 %Research objective, questions or hypotheses
Does not mention objections, research question (s) or hypotheses.
There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses.
The research objective, questions or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate.
The research objective, question or hypotheses are described and related to study methods.
Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher.
20.0 %Literature Review
Does not mention literature review.
There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review.
The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study.
The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described.
The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question.
20.0 %Frame of Reference (qualitative)
Does not mention frame of reference
There are some inaccuracies describing frame of reference.
The frame of reference elements are present and mostly accurate.
The frame of reference is described.
The frame of reference is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each o ...
Number of pages 12 Deadline 42 HoursInstructions This ass.docxhopeaustin33688
Number of pages: 12
Deadline: 42 Hours
Instructions: This assignment includes several different sections and number of pages for each. I've given specific details in the attachment
All instructions/details/guidelines, as outlined and given in the other document, must be followed and adhered to
Paper written must meet all the requirements and parts given/outlined in the other document
Choose a grade level and social studies topic with supporting standards and plan a lesson to present in the classroom. Include grade-level appropriate activities that encourage active student engagement.
Address the following in your lesson plan:
1. Multiple intelligences
2. Authentic literature
3. Depth of Knowledge
4. Assessment of objective- Use three formative assessments during the lesson and one summative assessment at the end.
Teach your social studies lesson to a classroom of students.
In an essay of 1,000-1,250-words, reflect on the lesson and content.
Cite at least four references from educational journals and academic websites to support your teaching strategies.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %Lesson Plan
The lesson plan is missing many of the required components. The activities are missing, weak, or incomplete. Activities and assessments are not grade appropriate.
The lesson plan consists of most of the required components. Attention to detail is minimal, underdeveloped, or inappropriate for teaching. Activities and assessments are mostly grade appropriate.
The lesson plan consists of all the required components. Activities and assessments are appropriate for grade level and encourage participation.
All lesson plan components are addressed. The thinking skills and activities are thoughtfully developed and provide meaningful practice with familiar text. The activities are fun, interactive, and creative.
All lesson components are addressed. Exceptionally organized activities that create multiple and meaningful opportunities to practice. Activities are engaging.
45.0 %Reflection Essay
Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources were used to support major points.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. No outside sources were used to support major points.
Content addresses most of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are addressed. Research is evident.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, up-to-date, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. At least two relevant academic sources were cited.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated..
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505VARK Analysis Paper100.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire20.0%Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire.Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection. Preferred Learning Strategies20.0%Personal learning strategy content is missing.Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete. Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described. Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented.Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles.Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator)20.0%Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented.Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies.Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support.Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them a.
Attitude, Legislation, and Litigation 1 Unsatisf.docxikirkton
Attitude, Legislation, and Litigation
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
50.0 % Attitude, Legislation, and Litigation: Address the social implications of attitude, legislation, and litigation on the lives of students with disabilities
Fails to address the changes in perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
Explanations of changes in the following are underdeveloped: perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
Adequately explains changes in perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
Proficiently explains changes in perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
Comprehensively explains changes in perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
30.0 % Content Comprehension
Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources are used to support major points.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Major points are not clear or persuasive. No outside sources are used to support major points.
Content is not comprehensive or persuasive. Major points are addressed but are not well-supported by outside sources. Research is inadequate in either relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. Irrelevant academic sources are cited.
Content is comprehensive and accurate; definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, timely, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment's criteria. At least two relevant academic sources are cited.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported. Research is adequate, timely, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment' ...
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the cond ...
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerati.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of n ...
DetailsMitigating biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is a topic .docxraelenehqvic
Details:
Mitigating biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is a topic of much research including the creation of methods to measure the extent of these behaviors. In this assignment, you will evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
Directions:
Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words in which you evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Include the following in your paper:
1. An evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures
2. An evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Do these methods conform to psychometrically sound measurement principles? Why or why not?
Measuring Biases, Stereotypes, and Heuristics
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
35.0 %
Evaluative Summary of the Properties of Psychometrically Sound Measures Benchmarks C 3.3: Evaluate and identify properties of psychometrically sound measures.
No evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented.
A vague evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from both nonscholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorough evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A thorough evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
30.0 %
Evaluation of the Methods Used to Measure Biases, Stereotypes, and Heuristics
No evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented.
A vague evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented. Information presented is from both nonscholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorou.
Details 2Note This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000.docxsimonithomas47935
Details: 2
Note: This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include:
1. Summary of teaching plan
2. Epidemiological rationale for topic
3. Evaluation of teaching experience
4. Community response to teaching
5. Areas of strengths and areas of improvement
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center
Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan With Epidemiological Rationale for Topic
Summary of community teaching plan is not identified or missing.
Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete.
Summary of community teaching plan is offered but some elements are vague.
Focus of community teaching is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Rationale is not provided.
Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings and supported by explanation of epidemiological rationale.
50.0 %Evaluation of Teaching Experience With Discussion of Community Response to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength and Areas of Improvement Described
Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete.
Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear and/or discussion of community response to teaching is missing.
Evaluation of teaching experience is provided with a brief discussion of community response to teaching.
A detailed evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response to teaching and areas of strength/improvement is provided.
Comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response provided along with a detailed description of barriers and strategies to overcome barriers is provided.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are establi.
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
reviewing the Literature and Theory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Literature Review and Supporting Argument
References are not categorized in an appropriately logical manner. Little or no information is given regarding the value of the references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation does an incomplete job of categorizing project references. Review does a superficial or incomplete job of describing the value of references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation categorizes information from project references appropriately and incorporates the supporting evidence into an argument that validates the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation clearly categorizes and incorporates applicable information from project references and applies the basic research well towards validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Collection of references covers most aspects of the project in adequate depth.
Presentation utilizes the categorized information from the references in a clear and comprehensive manner to clearly validate and support the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project; Collection of references is comprehensive and supports all aspects of the project.
20.0 %Critical Analysis of Supporting Data
Argument is more of a literature review than a supporting, critical analysis of the reference contributions to the project.
Argument does not utilize reference information adequately to provide support for why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Argument is somewhat vague or incomplete.
Argument uses relevant findings from supporting references to present a basic position as to why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject.
Argument uses reference material in an appropriate manner to convince the reader that the problem, purpose, and possible solution are clearly valid. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Argument is convincing and clearly articulated with adequate supporting references to validate the problem, purpose, and solution of the project. Argument demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %Incorporation of a Valid Theory to Support the Project
A valid theory to be incorporated in support of the project is not identified or explained, or a theory is improperly stated. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Identification and explanation of a valid theory to incorporate in support of the project is somewhat vague or incomplete.
A valid theory is identified and a basic explanation is provided of how the theory is incorporated in support of the project. Minimal acceptable details are pr ...
Intellectual DisabilityDiscuss the meanings of intelligence and .docxnormanibarber20063
Intellectual Disability
Discuss the meanings of intelligence and adaptive behavior with a teacher of students with intellectual disability (ID). Include discussion of the following questions:
1. What problems are associated with assessing students with ID?
2. What are the characteristics of the teacher's students with ID that result in eligibility for special education?
Write a summary and evaluation of the discussion in an essay of 1,000-1,250 words.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Academic Instruction for Students with Moderate and Severe Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms
Read Chapters 3 and 6 in Academic Instruction for Students with Moderate and Severe Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms.
http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/sage/2010/academic-instruction-for-students-with-moderate-and-severe-intellectual-disabilities-in-inclusive-classrooms_ebook_1e.php
Before Special Ed: How Pre-Referral Works
Read “Before Special Ed: How Pre-Referral
Works,” located on the GreatSchools website.
http://www.greatschools.org/gk/articles/pre-referral/
2. Children with an Intellectual Disability
Read "Children with an Intellectual Disability," located on the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry website.
http://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Facts_for_Families/Facts_for_Families_Pages/Children_with_an_Intellectual_Disability_23.aspx
50.0 %Intelligence and Adaptive Behavior: Discuss the meanings of intelligence and adaptive behavior with a teacher of students with ID
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is irrelevant, and fails to incorporate one or both of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is underdeveloped, and incorporates one of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is adequate, and includes discussion of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is proficient, and includes discussion of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is relevant, and includes discussion of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
30.0 %Content Comprehension
Content is incomplete and omit.
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the te.docxcheryllwashburn
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Interview a person of your choice (they may be your parents, relatives, or friends). These questions must address the following:
Cognitive, physical, and psychosocial development during the interviewee's Maturity stage of adulthood (age 65 or older).
How peers influenced the interviewee during his or her lifetime.
What people and/or events influenced the interviewee's development of morals.
How the interviewee's experiences have formulated who he or she is as a Mature adult.
Note: American Psychological Association (APA) ethical guidelines indicate that interviewees have the right to refuse to answer any question posed to them by an interviewer. Please ensure that your interviewees are aware of this, and do not force them to answer where the opportunity to reply has been refused.
Pick one of the theories reviewed in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Write a paper of 750-1,000 words, discussing the selected theory and how it relates to your interview. Include the following in your paper:
A description of the selected theory.
A description of your interviewee (gender, age, ethnicity, etc.)
How the interviewee's responses illustrate the selected theory. Support your response with examples.
Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the text in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
THERE NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 4 SCHOLARY RESOURCES USED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT. THE PAPER NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN IN APA FORMAT.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Selected Theory
Does not include a description of the selected theory.
Includes an inaccurate or vague description of the selected theory.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by included an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance to the topic.
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the selected theory by providing an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance on the topic.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by including a detailed and accurate description of the theory as well as major points of importance to the topic and clearly ties the information provided to the practice of professional counseling.
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Interviewee (Gender, Age, Ethnicity, etc.)
Does not include a description of the interviewee and/or the person interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment.
A minimal description of the interviewed was included and/or the person interviewed was minimally appropriate for the assignmen.
DetailsWrite a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-b.docxsimonithomas47935
Details:
Write a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-based approaches to the delivery of health services. The focus of the paper should be one type of health care environment, such a long-term care facility.
Within your paper, be sure to do the following:
1. Present a patient case (this does not need to be detailed).
2. Describe the team that would deliver care and their individual roles.
3. Identify and describe the indicators and determinants of health that would influence or impact this case.
4. Describe the impact this team-based approach would have on management and line staff.
5. Provide an analysis of key financial and resource savings for consumers and insurance companies as they apply to this model.
6. From a leadership position, explain the advantages of using a team-based approach.
Your paper should contain the following parts:
1. Introduction
2. Body paragraphs (Possible headings include: Case Description, Health Care Delivery Team, Indicators and Determinants of Health, Financial and Resource Analysis, Team-Based Approach Advantages.)
3. Conclusion
Revise your paper using suggestions from the peer reviewer.
Use the Library to find at least two peer-reviewed sources.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines.
Rubrics
Health Care Delivery Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Criteria
Description of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially describes the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.
Surface-level description of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Description is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Thoroughly describes major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
40.0 %Analysis
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.
Surface-level evaluation of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
20.0 %Content Comprehension
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is complete but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Definitions are clearly stated.
10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropria.
Top of FormBenchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Fram.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
Benchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Framework for Leadership
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Selection of Book About a Leader Who Chose Leadership as a Vocation
Does not select a book about a leader or provide an explanation as to why that person chose leadership as a vocation.
Selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents a selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the selection and explanation. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Theoretical Framework, Style, and Leadership Traits present in the Work 2.1: Analyze theories of leadership and motivation in order to inspire followership.
Does not examine the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation.
Examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents an examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the examination. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Qualities and Shortcomings of the Selected Leader
Does not ...
Bluestone Company had three intangible assets at the end of 2014 (en.docxlascellesjaimie
Bluestone Company had three intangible assets at the end of 2014 (end of the accounting year):
a.
A patent purchased from Miller Co. on January 1, 2014, for a cash cost of $4,000. When purchased, the patent had an estimated life of ten years.
b.
A trademark was registered with the federal government for $11,000. Management estimated that the trademark could be worth as much as $260,000 because it has an indefinite life.
c.
Computer licensing rights were purchased on January 1, 2014, for $36,000. The rights are expected to have a four-year useful life to the company.
.
BIOLOGY 103 Spring 2015FINAL EXAMINATIONPlease copy and paste th.docxlascellesjaimie
BIOLOGY 103 Spring 2015
FINAL EXAMINATION
Please copy and paste the final examination into a Word file. Complete it in this form (do not make any structural changes!) and submit it as an attachment into your
Assignment Folder.
Do not forget to put your name on top of the exam!
The absolute deadline for submission is
Sunday, March 8, NOON
.
I cannot accept any later submissions.
YOUR NAME:
_______________________________________________________________
Total possible points: 100
I. Multiple choice questions. Please
bold
or
underline
the correct answer (1point each=50 points)
1. In October of 2003, a raging wildfire swept through the mountain ecosystems in Southern California, burning everything in its path to the ground and driving away all of the animals. In order for the mountain ecosystem to establish itself, which member of the food web has to return first?
Deer
Coyotes
Snake
Grasses
2. Suppose you conduct an experiment which simulates glacial recession over time. What is the dependent variable in this experiment?
Glacial mass
Sunlight
The season
Time
3. How many dependent variables can be tested during any single experiment?
4
3
2
1
4. The effectiveness of a medication containing growth hormones is tested on a group of young male rabbits 3 weeks of age. The best control group would be:
Any group of rabbits
A group of male rabbits, three weeks old, not given the medication
A group of female rabbits, three weeks old, not given the medication
A mixed group of male/female rabbits, three weeks old, not given the medication
No control is required; just measure whether the rabbits grew
5. When writing a lab report or a research paper, you need to show what the difference is between the “Results” section and the ”Discussion” section. Which of the following is correct?
The
Discussion
analyzes data, whereas the
Results
analyzes the procedure.
The
Discussion
analyzes data, whereas the
Results
displays data.
The
Discussion
displays data, whereas the
Results
analyzes the Discussion.
The
Discussion
displays the procedure, whereas the
Results
analyzes the data.
6. What characteristic of carbon makes it a good backbone for creating diverse and durable molecules?
Carbon is a large atom
Carbon forms four covalent bonds
Carbon forms hydrogen bonds
All of the above
7. Which of the following reactions or pathways is catabolic?
Converting glucose to carbon dioxide and water (cellular respiration)
Making starch from many glucose monomers
Photosynthesis, which builds glucose from carbon dioxide using energy from light
Making ATP from ADP and phosphate
8. One human disease is caused by a change in the DNA from GAA to GUA. This change is an example of:
Crossing-over
A meiosis error
A mitosis error
A mutation
9. What subatomic particles are found in the nucleus?
Elecctrons
Protons
Neutrons
Protons and neutrons
Protons and electrons
10. Which of the following describes H
2
0, NaCl, CO
2
, and HCl?
All are acids
All are gases
All .
Bluestone Copany had three intangible assets at the end of the curre.docxlascellesjaimie
Bluestone Copany had three intangible assets at the end of the current year: A patent purchased this year from miller Co. on January 1 for a cash cost of $9,300. When purchased, the patent had an estimated life of 15 years
1. Compute the acquisition cost of each intangible asset?
2. Compute the amortization of each intangible for the current year ended December 31?
3. Show how these assets and any related expenses should be reported on the balance sheet and income statement for the current year?
.
Biology 110 Online Evolution lab
Student Directions:
1.
Go to
http://www.sasinschool.com/login
2.
In the Quick Launch box (will have QL# inside) on the upper right corner of the screen, enter: 4
3.
When prompted by the popup enter the username: located5questions (it’s weird, but no password is needed with this login).
If you have pop-ups blocked you will have to allow pop-ups from SAS Curriculum (when I work in Chrome, a little red x appears at the end of the URL address box—I click on the x and am allowed the option of “always allow pop-ups from SAS Curriculum…). The program
requires Java
and maybe additional add-ons. Be sure to “allow” these in order to get the simulation to run.
4.
Clicking on the “Getting Started” tab will provide the information provided below. Be sure to read through this information prior to beginning.
5.
Clicking on the “data and observations” tab will provide the same information that I’ve included below. No need to print again. You will need to follow the directions and answer these questions as you go through the simulation.
6.
Clicking on the “analysis and conclusions” will also provide the same information as I’ve provided below after the “data and observations section”.
Type your answers in as you proceed through this section.
7.
Ready to begin? Read the “About the Topic” section and proceed through the rest of the lab. Once you have completed each section, don’t forget to save the document with your name in the file name. Submit on Moodle!
About the Topic
Sources Of Genetic Variability
Genetic variations provide the raw material for
evolution
. These variations come from two sources:1.
mutations
that produce different
alleles
, and 2. sexual reproduction, in which alleles from parents segregate and recombine in offspring.
Evolution
Biological evolution involves genetic changes in a group of organisms. These changes occur on two levels:
macroevolution
(the grand scale), and
microevolution
(the small scale). On the "macro" scale of evolution, different species arise, live for a while, and then pass into extinction as new species arise to replace them (over thousands or millions of years). Microevolution involves small-scale changes within a single species. This occurs as populations respond to their own unique circumstances over a period of a few generations. Given enough time, microevolution can lead to macroevolution.
Populations Evolve, Not Individuals
Because an individual's genes are determined at conception, individuals can't evolve. But individuals are part of a
population
that may change over time. Some individuals have
genotypes
that are preferentially suited for survival. These individuals tend to produce more offspring. Thus, a larger proportion of their alleles is passed down to succeeding generations. Over time, the proportion of "good" alleles within the population increases and the "less good" alleles decrease. (
However, note that some traits are neither “good” or “bad”.
More Related Content
Similar to Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
RubricsTop of FormCLC - Health Care Literacy Presentation .docxSUBHI7
Rubrics
Top of Form
CLC - Health Care Literacy Presentation
1
Unsatisfactory
59.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
30.0 %Selection of two strategies focused on health care literacy
Presentation does not incorporate two strategies focused on health care literacy.
Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy and information is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
Presentation incorporates two strategies focused on health care literacy and the information is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
35.0 %Development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community
Presentation does not incorporate the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community.
Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.
Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.
Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community and information is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.
Presentation incorporates the development of an intervention targeted to a selected population or cultural community and the information is comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
8.0 %Presentation of Content
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. Speaker notes are absent.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. Speaker notes are insufficient.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. Speaker notes are sufficient and clear.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable ...
Top of FormCoyne and Messina Articles, Part 3 Spearman Coefficie.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
Coyne and Messina Articles, Part 3 Spearman Coefficient Review
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Review of the Use of the Spearman Correlation Coefficient in the Article by Messina et al.
Failure to demonstrate the ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study.
Demonstrates only minimal ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study
Demonstrates ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study, but has some slight misunderstanding of the process and applications.
Demonstrates ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study (in student's own words).
Demonstrates clearly and fully the ability to understand the use of the Spearman correlation coefficient and the appropriateness of its use in the study (in the student's own words). Shows ability to think critically about the choice of the statistic.
30.0 %Integration of Information from Outside Resources into the Body of Paper
Failure to use references, examples, or explanations.
Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references included.
Supports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published references to support claims and ideas.
Supports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Analysis and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria.
Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully analyzes, evaluates, and describes major points of the criteria.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Assignment Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thorough ...
Top of Form 1VARK Analysis Paper 1Unsatisf.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form 1
VARK Analysis Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
50.0 % Personal Learning Style and Strategies
Personal learning style and learning strategies content is missing.
Personal learning style is identified, but summary is incomplete. Preferred learning strategies and personal learning style strategies are not compared. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Personal learning style is identified and basic summary is provided. Some preferred learning strategies are described and compared against those of the personal learning style. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.
Personal learning style is identified and described in detail. Preferred learning strategies and learning style strategies are compared in detail. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
30.0 % Perceptions of Learning and Teaching
A discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is missing.
A discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is present, but may be incomplete, lack relevant information, or not meet assignment criteria. References are vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
A basic discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is present and mostly relevant. References are mostly appropriate. Some subject knowledge is evident.
A detailed discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is offered. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Good subject knowledge is demonstrated.
A detailed discussion of how awareness of learning attributes influences perceptions of teaching and learning is offered. References are appropriate and clearly connected to content. Offers examples that display personal insight and/or reflection. Subject knowledge appears comprehensive.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thes ...
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less Than Satisfactory65.003Sa.docxeugeniadean34240
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Students
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to students.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Parents
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to parents.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
15.0 %Legal and Ethical Implications: Reflection Regarding Teachers
Does not reflect on the information from specific articles.
Reflects on the information from specific articles, but reflection lacks depth of insight.
Reflection indicates legal and ethical implications for classroom management as it relates to teachers.
Implications are adequately described and an opinion is expressed.
Implications are described clearly with anecdotes.
20.0 %Informing Personal Classroom Management System
Does not include ways in which this informs a personal classroom management system.
Analysis of the implications of legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents for classroom management is sketchy and lacks depth of insight.
Essay contains an analysis of how legal and ethical issues regarding the rights of students, teachers and parents inform a personal classroom management system.
Analysis is clear and concisely presented.
Analysis draws specific conclusions about how these implications affect the student's personal classroom management system.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is in part or wholly incoherent.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.
Argument is strong, showing logical progressions. Firm control of the technique of argumentation is evident. Smooth progression of claims
The argument presents a clear, convincing and persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction,.
Top of FormBenchmark - Research Critique Part 1 1Unsatisfa.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
Benchmark - Research Critique Part 1
1
Unsatisfactory 0%-71%
71.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72%-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76%-83%
79.00%
4
Good 84%-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90% - 100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Research problem and purpose
Does not mention research problem or purpose of study.
There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem.
The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate.
The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing.
The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing addressed.
20.0 %Research objective, questions or hypotheses
Does not mention objections, research question (s) or hypotheses.
There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses.
The research objective, questions or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate.
The research objective, question or hypotheses are described and related to study methods.
Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher.
20.0 %Literature Review
Does not mention literature review.
There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review.
The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study.
The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described.
The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question.
20.0 %Frame of Reference (qualitative)
Does not mention frame of reference
There are some inaccuracies describing frame of reference.
The frame of reference elements are present and mostly accurate.
The frame of reference is described.
The frame of reference is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each o ...
Number of pages 12 Deadline 42 HoursInstructions This ass.docxhopeaustin33688
Number of pages: 12
Deadline: 42 Hours
Instructions: This assignment includes several different sections and number of pages for each. I've given specific details in the attachment
All instructions/details/guidelines, as outlined and given in the other document, must be followed and adhered to
Paper written must meet all the requirements and parts given/outlined in the other document
Choose a grade level and social studies topic with supporting standards and plan a lesson to present in the classroom. Include grade-level appropriate activities that encourage active student engagement.
Address the following in your lesson plan:
1. Multiple intelligences
2. Authentic literature
3. Depth of Knowledge
4. Assessment of objective- Use three formative assessments during the lesson and one summative assessment at the end.
Teach your social studies lesson to a classroom of students.
In an essay of 1,000-1,250-words, reflect on the lesson and content.
Cite at least four references from educational journals and academic websites to support your teaching strategies.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %Lesson Plan
The lesson plan is missing many of the required components. The activities are missing, weak, or incomplete. Activities and assessments are not grade appropriate.
The lesson plan consists of most of the required components. Attention to detail is minimal, underdeveloped, or inappropriate for teaching. Activities and assessments are mostly grade appropriate.
The lesson plan consists of all the required components. Activities and assessments are appropriate for grade level and encourage participation.
All lesson plan components are addressed. The thinking skills and activities are thoughtfully developed and provide meaningful practice with familiar text. The activities are fun, interactive, and creative.
All lesson components are addressed. Exceptionally organized activities that create multiple and meaningful opportunities to practice. Activities are engaging.
45.0 %Reflection Essay
Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources were used to support major points.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. No outside sources were used to support major points.
Content addresses most of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. Major points are addressed. Research is evident.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, up-to-date, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment’s criteria. At least two relevant academic sources were cited.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated..
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeNRS-429VNNRS-429VN-O505VARK Analysis Paper100.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire20.0%Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire.Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection. Preferred Learning Strategies20.0%Personal learning strategy content is missing.Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete. Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described. Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented.Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles.Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator)20.0%Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented.Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies.Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support.Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them a.
Attitude, Legislation, and Litigation 1 Unsatisf.docxikirkton
Attitude, Legislation, and Litigation
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
50.0 % Attitude, Legislation, and Litigation: Address the social implications of attitude, legislation, and litigation on the lives of students with disabilities
Fails to address the changes in perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
Explanations of changes in the following are underdeveloped: perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
Adequately explains changes in perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
Proficiently explains changes in perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
Comprehensively explains changes in perception regarding disabled students; the influence of legislation and litigation; predicted outcomes for disabled students because of teacher accountability i.e., higher standards; and reflections on first personal encounter with disabled student.
30.0 % Content Comprehension
Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources are used to support major points.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Major points are not clear or persuasive. No outside sources are used to support major points.
Content is not comprehensive or persuasive. Major points are addressed but are not well-supported by outside sources. Research is inadequate in either relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. Irrelevant academic sources are cited.
Content is comprehensive and accurate; definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, timely, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment's criteria. At least two relevant academic sources are cited.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported. Research is adequate, timely, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment' ...
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideratio.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the cond ...
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerati.docxSUBHI7
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
75.0 %Content
15.0 %Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
15.0 %Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of n ...
DetailsMitigating biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is a topic .docxraelenehqvic
Details:
Mitigating biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is a topic of much research including the creation of methods to measure the extent of these behaviors. In this assignment, you will evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
Directions:
Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words in which you evaluate the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Include the following in your paper:
1. An evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures
2. An evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics. Do these methods conform to psychometrically sound measurement principles? Why or why not?
Measuring Biases, Stereotypes, and Heuristics
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
35.0 %
Evaluative Summary of the Properties of Psychometrically Sound Measures Benchmarks C 3.3: Evaluate and identify properties of psychometrically sound measures.
No evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented.
A vague evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from both nonscholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorough evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A thorough evaluative summary of the properties of psychometrically sound measures is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
30.0 %
Evaluation of the Methods Used to Measure Biases, Stereotypes, and Heuristics
No evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented.
A vague evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory evaluation of the methods used to measure biases, stereotypes, and heuristics is presented. Information presented is from both nonscholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorou.
Details 2Note This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000.docxsimonithomas47935
Details: 2
Note: This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include:
1. Summary of teaching plan
2. Epidemiological rationale for topic
3. Evaluation of teaching experience
4. Community response to teaching
5. Areas of strengths and areas of improvement
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center
Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan With Epidemiological Rationale for Topic
Summary of community teaching plan is not identified or missing.
Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete.
Summary of community teaching plan is offered but some elements are vague.
Focus of community teaching is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Rationale is not provided.
Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings and supported by explanation of epidemiological rationale.
50.0 %Evaluation of Teaching Experience With Discussion of Community Response to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength and Areas of Improvement Described
Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete.
Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear and/or discussion of community response to teaching is missing.
Evaluation of teaching experience is provided with a brief discussion of community response to teaching.
A detailed evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response to teaching and areas of strength/improvement is provided.
Comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response provided along with a detailed description of barriers and strategies to overcome barriers is provided.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are establi.
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
reviewing the Literature and Theory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Literature Review and Supporting Argument
References are not categorized in an appropriately logical manner. Little or no information is given regarding the value of the references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation does an incomplete job of categorizing project references. Review does a superficial or incomplete job of describing the value of references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation categorizes information from project references appropriately and incorporates the supporting evidence into an argument that validates the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation clearly categorizes and incorporates applicable information from project references and applies the basic research well towards validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Collection of references covers most aspects of the project in adequate depth.
Presentation utilizes the categorized information from the references in a clear and comprehensive manner to clearly validate and support the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project; Collection of references is comprehensive and supports all aspects of the project.
20.0 %Critical Analysis of Supporting Data
Argument is more of a literature review than a supporting, critical analysis of the reference contributions to the project.
Argument does not utilize reference information adequately to provide support for why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Argument is somewhat vague or incomplete.
Argument uses relevant findings from supporting references to present a basic position as to why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject.
Argument uses reference material in an appropriate manner to convince the reader that the problem, purpose, and possible solution are clearly valid. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Argument is convincing and clearly articulated with adequate supporting references to validate the problem, purpose, and solution of the project. Argument demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %Incorporation of a Valid Theory to Support the Project
A valid theory to be incorporated in support of the project is not identified or explained, or a theory is improperly stated. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Identification and explanation of a valid theory to incorporate in support of the project is somewhat vague or incomplete.
A valid theory is identified and a basic explanation is provided of how the theory is incorporated in support of the project. Minimal acceptable details are pr ...
Intellectual DisabilityDiscuss the meanings of intelligence and .docxnormanibarber20063
Intellectual Disability
Discuss the meanings of intelligence and adaptive behavior with a teacher of students with intellectual disability (ID). Include discussion of the following questions:
1. What problems are associated with assessing students with ID?
2. What are the characteristics of the teacher's students with ID that result in eligibility for special education?
Write a summary and evaluation of the discussion in an essay of 1,000-1,250 words.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Academic Instruction for Students with Moderate and Severe Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms
Read Chapters 3 and 6 in Academic Instruction for Students with Moderate and Severe Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms.
http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/sage/2010/academic-instruction-for-students-with-moderate-and-severe-intellectual-disabilities-in-inclusive-classrooms_ebook_1e.php
Before Special Ed: How Pre-Referral Works
Read “Before Special Ed: How Pre-Referral
Works,” located on the GreatSchools website.
http://www.greatschools.org/gk/articles/pre-referral/
2. Children with an Intellectual Disability
Read "Children with an Intellectual Disability," located on the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry website.
http://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Facts_for_Families/Facts_for_Families_Pages/Children_with_an_Intellectual_Disability_23.aspx
50.0 %Intelligence and Adaptive Behavior: Discuss the meanings of intelligence and adaptive behavior with a teacher of students with ID
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is irrelevant, and fails to incorporate one or both of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is underdeveloped, and incorporates one of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is adequate, and includes discussion of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is proficient, and includes discussion of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
Summary and evaluation of the discussion is relevant, and includes discussion of the following: problems associated with assessing students with ID, the characteristics of the teacher?s students with ID that result in eligibility for special education.
30.0 %Content Comprehension
Content is incomplete and omit.
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the te.docxcheryllwashburn
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Interview a person of your choice (they may be your parents, relatives, or friends). These questions must address the following:
Cognitive, physical, and psychosocial development during the interviewee's Maturity stage of adulthood (age 65 or older).
How peers influenced the interviewee during his or her lifetime.
What people and/or events influenced the interviewee's development of morals.
How the interviewee's experiences have formulated who he or she is as a Mature adult.
Note: American Psychological Association (APA) ethical guidelines indicate that interviewees have the right to refuse to answer any question posed to them by an interviewer. Please ensure that your interviewees are aware of this, and do not force them to answer where the opportunity to reply has been refused.
Pick one of the theories reviewed in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Write a paper of 750-1,000 words, discussing the selected theory and how it relates to your interview. Include the following in your paper:
A description of the selected theory.
A description of your interviewee (gender, age, ethnicity, etc.)
How the interviewee's responses illustrate the selected theory. Support your response with examples.
Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the text in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
THERE NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 4 SCHOLARY RESOURCES USED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT. THE PAPER NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN IN APA FORMAT.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Selected Theory
Does not include a description of the selected theory.
Includes an inaccurate or vague description of the selected theory.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by included an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance to the topic.
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the selected theory by providing an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance on the topic.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by including a detailed and accurate description of the theory as well as major points of importance to the topic and clearly ties the information provided to the practice of professional counseling.
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Interviewee (Gender, Age, Ethnicity, etc.)
Does not include a description of the interviewee and/or the person interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment.
A minimal description of the interviewed was included and/or the person interviewed was minimally appropriate for the assignmen.
DetailsWrite a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-b.docxsimonithomas47935
Details:
Write a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-based approaches to the delivery of health services. The focus of the paper should be one type of health care environment, such a long-term care facility.
Within your paper, be sure to do the following:
1. Present a patient case (this does not need to be detailed).
2. Describe the team that would deliver care and their individual roles.
3. Identify and describe the indicators and determinants of health that would influence or impact this case.
4. Describe the impact this team-based approach would have on management and line staff.
5. Provide an analysis of key financial and resource savings for consumers and insurance companies as they apply to this model.
6. From a leadership position, explain the advantages of using a team-based approach.
Your paper should contain the following parts:
1. Introduction
2. Body paragraphs (Possible headings include: Case Description, Health Care Delivery Team, Indicators and Determinants of Health, Financial and Resource Analysis, Team-Based Approach Advantages.)
3. Conclusion
Revise your paper using suggestions from the peer reviewer.
Use the Library to find at least two peer-reviewed sources.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines.
Rubrics
Health Care Delivery Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 %Criteria
Description of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially describes the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.
Surface-level description of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Description is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Thoroughly describes major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
40.0 %Analysis
Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.
Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.
Surface-level evaluation of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.
Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria.
Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
20.0 %Content Comprehension
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
Content is complete but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated.
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Definitions are clearly stated.
10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropria.
Top of FormBenchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Fram.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
Benchmark Assignment - Analysis of a Theoretical Framework for Leadership
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Selection of Book About a Leader Who Chose Leadership as a Vocation
Does not select a book about a leader or provide an explanation as to why that person chose leadership as a vocation.
Selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents a selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed selection of a book about a leader as well as explanation of why that person chose leadership as a vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the selection and explanation. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Theoretical Framework, Style, and Leadership Traits present in the Work 2.1: Analyze theories of leadership and motivation in order to inspire followership.
Does not examine the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation.
Examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation is incomplete or insufficient. Evidence to justify conclusions is vague and/or irrelevant. Subject knowledge is unclear and/or inconsistent.
Presents an elemental examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Some subject knowledge is evident.
Presents an examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Detailed examples and evidence are included. Subject knowledge is competent.
Presents a thorough and fully-developed examination of the theoretical framework, style, and leadership traits that present in the selected work as well as how the individual has adopted leadership as their vocation. Offers detailed evidence that justifies conclusions about the examination. Includes relevant examples and applicable insight. Demonstrates comprehensive subject knowledge and understanding.
25.0 %Qualities and Shortcomings of the Selected Leader
Does not ...
Similar to Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx (18)
Bluestone Company had three intangible assets at the end of 2014 (en.docxlascellesjaimie
Bluestone Company had three intangible assets at the end of 2014 (end of the accounting year):
a.
A patent purchased from Miller Co. on January 1, 2014, for a cash cost of $4,000. When purchased, the patent had an estimated life of ten years.
b.
A trademark was registered with the federal government for $11,000. Management estimated that the trademark could be worth as much as $260,000 because it has an indefinite life.
c.
Computer licensing rights were purchased on January 1, 2014, for $36,000. The rights are expected to have a four-year useful life to the company.
.
BIOLOGY 103 Spring 2015FINAL EXAMINATIONPlease copy and paste th.docxlascellesjaimie
BIOLOGY 103 Spring 2015
FINAL EXAMINATION
Please copy and paste the final examination into a Word file. Complete it in this form (do not make any structural changes!) and submit it as an attachment into your
Assignment Folder.
Do not forget to put your name on top of the exam!
The absolute deadline for submission is
Sunday, March 8, NOON
.
I cannot accept any later submissions.
YOUR NAME:
_______________________________________________________________
Total possible points: 100
I. Multiple choice questions. Please
bold
or
underline
the correct answer (1point each=50 points)
1. In October of 2003, a raging wildfire swept through the mountain ecosystems in Southern California, burning everything in its path to the ground and driving away all of the animals. In order for the mountain ecosystem to establish itself, which member of the food web has to return first?
Deer
Coyotes
Snake
Grasses
2. Suppose you conduct an experiment which simulates glacial recession over time. What is the dependent variable in this experiment?
Glacial mass
Sunlight
The season
Time
3. How many dependent variables can be tested during any single experiment?
4
3
2
1
4. The effectiveness of a medication containing growth hormones is tested on a group of young male rabbits 3 weeks of age. The best control group would be:
Any group of rabbits
A group of male rabbits, three weeks old, not given the medication
A group of female rabbits, three weeks old, not given the medication
A mixed group of male/female rabbits, three weeks old, not given the medication
No control is required; just measure whether the rabbits grew
5. When writing a lab report or a research paper, you need to show what the difference is between the “Results” section and the ”Discussion” section. Which of the following is correct?
The
Discussion
analyzes data, whereas the
Results
analyzes the procedure.
The
Discussion
analyzes data, whereas the
Results
displays data.
The
Discussion
displays data, whereas the
Results
analyzes the Discussion.
The
Discussion
displays the procedure, whereas the
Results
analyzes the data.
6. What characteristic of carbon makes it a good backbone for creating diverse and durable molecules?
Carbon is a large atom
Carbon forms four covalent bonds
Carbon forms hydrogen bonds
All of the above
7. Which of the following reactions or pathways is catabolic?
Converting glucose to carbon dioxide and water (cellular respiration)
Making starch from many glucose monomers
Photosynthesis, which builds glucose from carbon dioxide using energy from light
Making ATP from ADP and phosphate
8. One human disease is caused by a change in the DNA from GAA to GUA. This change is an example of:
Crossing-over
A meiosis error
A mitosis error
A mutation
9. What subatomic particles are found in the nucleus?
Elecctrons
Protons
Neutrons
Protons and neutrons
Protons and electrons
10. Which of the following describes H
2
0, NaCl, CO
2
, and HCl?
All are acids
All are gases
All .
Bluestone Copany had three intangible assets at the end of the curre.docxlascellesjaimie
Bluestone Copany had three intangible assets at the end of the current year: A patent purchased this year from miller Co. on January 1 for a cash cost of $9,300. When purchased, the patent had an estimated life of 15 years
1. Compute the acquisition cost of each intangible asset?
2. Compute the amortization of each intangible for the current year ended December 31?
3. Show how these assets and any related expenses should be reported on the balance sheet and income statement for the current year?
.
Biology 110 Online Evolution lab
Student Directions:
1.
Go to
http://www.sasinschool.com/login
2.
In the Quick Launch box (will have QL# inside) on the upper right corner of the screen, enter: 4
3.
When prompted by the popup enter the username: located5questions (it’s weird, but no password is needed with this login).
If you have pop-ups blocked you will have to allow pop-ups from SAS Curriculum (when I work in Chrome, a little red x appears at the end of the URL address box—I click on the x and am allowed the option of “always allow pop-ups from SAS Curriculum…). The program
requires Java
and maybe additional add-ons. Be sure to “allow” these in order to get the simulation to run.
4.
Clicking on the “Getting Started” tab will provide the information provided below. Be sure to read through this information prior to beginning.
5.
Clicking on the “data and observations” tab will provide the same information that I’ve included below. No need to print again. You will need to follow the directions and answer these questions as you go through the simulation.
6.
Clicking on the “analysis and conclusions” will also provide the same information as I’ve provided below after the “data and observations section”.
Type your answers in as you proceed through this section.
7.
Ready to begin? Read the “About the Topic” section and proceed through the rest of the lab. Once you have completed each section, don’t forget to save the document with your name in the file name. Submit on Moodle!
About the Topic
Sources Of Genetic Variability
Genetic variations provide the raw material for
evolution
. These variations come from two sources:1.
mutations
that produce different
alleles
, and 2. sexual reproduction, in which alleles from parents segregate and recombine in offspring.
Evolution
Biological evolution involves genetic changes in a group of organisms. These changes occur on two levels:
macroevolution
(the grand scale), and
microevolution
(the small scale). On the "macro" scale of evolution, different species arise, live for a while, and then pass into extinction as new species arise to replace them (over thousands or millions of years). Microevolution involves small-scale changes within a single species. This occurs as populations respond to their own unique circumstances over a period of a few generations. Given enough time, microevolution can lead to macroevolution.
Populations Evolve, Not Individuals
Because an individual's genes are determined at conception, individuals can't evolve. But individuals are part of a
population
that may change over time. Some individuals have
genotypes
that are preferentially suited for survival. These individuals tend to produce more offspring. Thus, a larger proportion of their alleles is passed down to succeeding generations. Over time, the proportion of "good" alleles within the population increases and the "less good" alleles decrease. (
However, note that some traits are neither “good” or “bad”.
Biological Psychology WorksheetAnswer the following questions wi.docxlascellesjaimie
Biological Psychology Worksheet
Answer the following questions with 50- to 100-word responses.
Prepare to discuss your answers.
1.
What are the core assumptions of the biopsychological approach?
2.
What historical disciplines converge to create biological psychology?
3.
What
are some of the earliest examples of a biological approach to studying behavior?
4.
What are some examples of modern careers that have resulted from studying biological psychology?
Include an overview of the careers.
5.
How is biological psychology viewed by other professionals in psychology today?
.
Biodiversity hotspots are one conservation strategy used to direct f.docxlascellesjaimie
Biodiversity hotspots are one conservation strategy used to direct funds to areas in the globe that have the highest biodiversity and are most threatened. To qualify as a biodiversity hotspot an area must have more than 1,500 endemic plant species (0.5% of the world's total of 300,000) AND have experienced a 70% loss of habitat.
1) Each person will select a biodiversity hotspot (sign list in class) and use the Conservation Internationl Biodiversity Hotspots website as a key starting resource to find the following information to bring into class to
write on the board and share orally. USE THE WEBSITES POSTED UNDER ASSIGNMENTS/CH 1&2/HOTSPOTS to get started
:
a)
Overview
: Vital Signs Table: Total Endemic Plants, Human Population Density (
can copy and paste the table, but you must use an in-text citation
)
b)
Species
: Diversity and Endemism Table: Total Endemic Species for Plants, Mammals, Birds, Reptile, Amphibian and Fish (
copy and paste the table, but you must use an in-text citation)
c)
Threats
: List top three threats with
evidence
of why and how they impact the hotspot
d)
Projects
: What will take you the most time to find and evaluate is specific information about conservation actions in the hotspot region. You will want to include
who
(government, nonprofit, international agency) is
doing
what
(fence, antipoaching squad, protected area, farming project) at what
cost
(dollars) with
what measure of success
(#species saved over time, increase population size over time, area protected increased, % invasives reduced) and then
analyze if this is what is needed based
on the human impact and biodiversity loss data you have collected.
2) Your research results with
in-text citations
AND your list of at least
10 scientific references
using APA. You must physically have in your property and have read every source you cite.
REMEMBER YOU ARE SUMMARIZING KEY FACTS IN YOUR OWN WORDS
.
.
BIO9 Human Biology Term ProjectGoals1. Being able to understand.docxlascellesjaimie
BIO9 Human Biology Term Project
Goals:
1. Being able to understand and analyze information in the media.
2. Stimulate critical thinking and curiosity.
3. Being able to carry out bibliographical research.
4. Being able to write in a clear and precise way ideas and scientific information.
What the term project will consist of?
1. Find a news article (New York Times, Science Daily, BBC News or a different source) about some topic related to human biology that interests you.
2. Come up with a question related to that topic. The questions must be interesting enough so you can write a short paper based on it.
3. Attend the following library workshops: B, P and W (
http://www.ccsf.edu/en/library/research-help/instruction.html).These
workshops will help you to use the available resources to find scientific articles.
4. Write a paper that provides an answer to your question based on the information found in scientific articles.
What should the paper include?
1. A short summary of the news article you based your question on (no longer than half a page).
2. The question you want to answer in relation to the news article.
3. The answer to your question (2-4 pages). Include a conclusion.
4. Bibliography (at least three scientific articles).
What format should the paper have?
The paper needs to be typed, double-spaced and in 12 font.
How will the paper be evaluated?
1. Creativity: Is your question interesting enough that allows you to write a paper on it? (20 pts.)
2. Clear summary of the new article: Can I understand the main points of the news article by reading your summary? (10 pts.)
3. Do you answer the posed question? (15 pts.)
4. Does your paper have a sound conclusion? (20 pts.)
5. Did you use and cite in the proper way scientific articles? Did you attend the three library workshops? (15 pts.)
6. Is your paper written in a clear manner that makes use of proper grammar? (20 pts.)
**The news article you have chosen must be submitted by October 27th**
**The paper is due on December 3rd**
.
Bill of RightsWhen the Constitution was completed in the summer of.docxlascellesjaimie
Bill of Rights
When the Constitution was completed in the summer of 1787, approval by representatives from nine of the thirteen states was needed for it to become the nation’s law. The issue of individual rights was managed—though this, too, created conflict among the Framers—with the addition of the Bill of Rights. Change was written into the supreme law of the land; since then, legal institutionalization of changes has occurred. Since the Constitution’s adoption, change has taken place through the amendment process identified in the Constitution. Change has also occurred under the direction of the branches of government established in the Constitution: the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary.
Research
The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Review the Bill of Rights in your textbook and select one of the first ten amendments to research more thoroughly. Using the Argosy University online library resources, select at least three peer-reviewed articles about the amendment you have selected. Look specifically for articles that focus on current events or controversies related to the amendment and be prepared to summarize the content of each article.
Annotated Bibliography
Prepare an annotated bibliography of your research. Please read
Annotated Bibliography.pdf
for an overview on annotated bibiographies. Click
here
for an example of what an annotated bibliography looks like. Include the following:
For each article, write details such as the article title, author name, journal title, and publication date.
Write a summary of each article in 200–250 words.
Write the conclusions you have drawn from research and your opinion in 1–2 paragraphs.
Write a reference list of the selected articles in APA style.
Write a 2–3-page annotated bibliography in Word format. Apply APA standards for writing style to your work.
.
Biotechnology ApplicationsBiotechnology refers to the technical ap.docxlascellesjaimie
Biotechnology Applications
Biotechnology refers to the technical applications of living organisms or their functions. These applications may be used in engineering, medicine, or agriculture, to name a few. Biotechnology processes and procedures are varied and range from the domestication of animals to genetic engineering. At its core, biotechnology involves the modification of a biological process for a human defined purpose.
Use the Internet, Argosy University library resources, and your textbook to research the field of biotechnology.
Write a paper which includes the following:
Evaluate current or future applications of biotechnology in the fields of medicine or agriculture.
Provide at least three real-world examples of current or future applications of biotechnology in either of these fields. Present a minimum of three reliable references.
Write a 2–3-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention:
.
Bios of 20 Important WomenStudents will be required to complete bi.docxlascellesjaimie
Bios of 20 Important Women
Students will be required to complete bios of 20 important women contributing to American society to the Civil War. The bios should be no more than 8 sentences for each woman. You must include some of the following information about the topic:
a.
birthday and birthplace
education
family data
important events in her life
important influences in her life
historical contributions that she made or is making
awards or achievements
books, publications… by her
other data you deem important to note about her
you must use at least three sources for each bio; only one can be an electronic source.
.
Biomedical Essay: 5 sources minimum. MLA Format. Classical Argument 4-5 Typed Pgs., 1500 words min. Sources Highlighted in accordance with syllabus. Write an essay which supports your position concerning a debatable topic related to any aspect of biomedical phenomena in any social or historical context. Your essay must demonstrate classical argument form—i.e. include introduction/thesis, arguments, opposing views, refutations, and conclusion.
Topics Examples, (Do not use these topics) Create your own.
*Bio-Medical Focus: Facts, Ethics, and Corporate/Media Dynamics
Airport Searches and Scanners (Rapiscan & radiation)
*Vaccines: Pro and Con / Government Reimbursement
*GMO foods – Pro and Con
*Mental Telepathy
*Remote Viewing
*Guardasil
*Designer Babies
*Psychics
XXV.
MLA FORMAT SUMMARY: A METHOD OF DOCUMENTING SOURCES
(See also Guide in Textbook, pgs. 640-655 or
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/08/
)
(A Complete MLA Format Essay can be viewed at
http://www.dianahacker.com/pdfs/hacker-Daly-MLA.pdf
)
I IN-TEXT CITATIONS:
References in a paragraph to the source material from which research data is taken.
*In-Text citations can be in the midst of a sentence itself, or in a parenthetical reference at the end of the
sentence.
* In-text citations consist of the author’s last name (if available); if not--use
title (if available); if not—use
website from which the source is taken [in this order].
*If in-text citation lists title or website, short form should be used in in-text citation; and complete form in
Works Cited.
*List page number—only if it existed in the original source.
II.
WORKS CITED LIST:
A complete list of all source actually USED in the essay.
*Includes complete bibliographical information for each source
* Sources are listed in alphabetical order
* The Works Cited List is a separate page at the end of the essay (See textbook page 662 and examples below.
Works Cited List MUST follow these formats)
*Internet sources must include the date
you
looked at the source.
*Do not number your Works Cited List
III. NOTES
1. ALL OF THESE
MUST
BE DOCUMENTED IN MLA FORMAT:
*
Direct Quotes
: exact words from the original source
--in quotation marks or a long quote format
*
Paraphrases
: ideas taken from the original source, but the wording
is changed—no quotation marks.
*
Summaries:
Shortened version of original, but the wording is changed—no quotation marks
2. In a paragraph, the parenthetical reference goes at the end of the sentence BEFORE the period.
3.
LONG QUOTES
: (Exact words of the original author—which last more than lines.
Special rules
:
a) indent
10 spaces;
b) left justify; c) no quote marks; d) the parenthetical reference comes AFTER the period at the end of the long
quote.
SEE FOLLOWING PAGES FOR EXAMPLES
IV. EXAMPLES OF MLA CITATIONS WITH CORRESPONDING
WORKS CITED
LIST ENTRIES—
1. Direct Quote from Internet Source
--with parenthetical in-text citation
--note that .
Biology 110 Online Evolution lab Student Directions 1. Go to htt.docxlascellesjaimie
Biology 110 Online Evolution lab Student Directions: 1. Go to http://www.sasinschool.com/login 2. In the Quick Launch box (will have QL# inside) on the...
Biology 110 Online Evolution lab
Student Directions:
1.
Go to
http://www.sasinschool.com/login
2.
In the Quick Launch box (will have QL# inside) on the upper right corner of the screen, enter: 4
3.
When prompted by the popup enter the username: located5questions (it’s weird, but no password is needed with this login).
If you have pop-ups blocked you will have to allow pop-ups from SAS Curriculum (when I work in Chrome, a little red x appears at the end of the URL address box—I click on the x and am allowed the option of “always allow pop-ups from SAS Curriculum…). The program
requires Java
and maybe additional add-ons. Be sure to “allow” these in order to get the simulation to run.
4.
Clicking on the “Getting Started” tab will provide the information provided below. Be sure to read through this information prior to beginning.
5.
Clicking on the “data and observations” tab will provide the same information that I’ve included below. No need to print again. You will need to follow the directions and answer these questions as you go through the simulation.
6.
Clicking on the “analysis and conclusions” will also provide the same information as I’ve provided below after the “data and observations section”. Type your answers in as you proceed through this section.
7.
Ready to begin? Read the “About the Topic” section and proceed through the rest of the lab. Once you have completed each section, don’t forget to save the document with your name in the file name. Submit on Moodle!
About the Topic
Sources Of Genetic Variability
Genetic variations provide the raw material for
evolution
. These variations come from two sources:1.
mutations
that produce different
alleles
, and 2. sexual reproduction, in which alleles from parents segregate and recombine in offspring.
Evolution
Biological evolution involves genetic changes in a group of organisms. These changes occur on two levels:
macroevolution
(the grand scale), and
microevolution
(the small scale). On the "macro" scale of evolution, different species arise, live for a while, and then pass into extinction as new species arise to replace them (over thousands or millions of years). Microevolution involves small-scale changes within a single species. This occurs as populations respond to their own unique circumstances over a period of a few generations. Given enough time, microevolution can lead to macroevolution.
Populations Evolve, Not Individuals
Because an individual's genes are determined at conception, individuals can't evolve. But individuals are part of a
population
that may change over time. Some individuals have
genotypes
that are preferentially suited for survival. These individuals tend to produce more offspring. Thus, a larger proportion of their alleles is passed down to succeeding generations. Over time, the pr.
Biblical Worldview Essay InstructionsRationale for the Biblical .docxlascellesjaimie
Biblical Worldview Essay Instructions
Rationale for the Biblical Worldview Essay
Every person has a worldview whether he realizes it or not. What is a worldview? James W. Sire defines a worldview as:
[A] commitment, a fundamental orientation of the heart, that can be expressed as a story or in a set of presuppositions (assumptions which may be true, partially true or entirely false) that we hold (consciously or subconsciously, consistently or inconsistently) about the basic constitution of reality, and that provides the foundation on which we live and move and have our being.
[1]
Stated more succinctly, "…[A] worldview is simply the total set of beliefs that a person has about the biggest questions in life." F. Leroy Forlines describes such questions as the "inescapable questions of life." Life's inescapable questions include the following: "Is there a God? If so, what is He like? How can I know Him? Who am I? Where am I? How can I tell right from wrong? Is there life after death? What should I and what can I do about guilt? How can I deal with my inner pain?" Life's biggest, inescapable questions relate to whether there is a God, human origins, identity, purpose, and the hereafter, just to mention a few.
Satisfying answers to the "inescapable questions of life" are provided by the Holy Scriptures. The Holy Scriptures, consisting of the Old and New Testaments, form the starting point and foundation for the biblical worldview. More specifically related to our purposes, the apostle Paul reflects several components of the biblical worldview in his letter to the Romans.
The apostle Paul authored Romans toward the end of his third missionary journey, about 57 A.D. He addressed this letter specifically to the Christians in Rome. At the time the church in Rome consisted of Jewish and Gentile believers, with Gentile Christians in the majority. Paul wrote to the Christians in Rome in order to address specific concerns and challenges they were facing. While Romans was an occasional letter (not a systematic theology), Paul presents the Gospel of Jesus Christ in a very systematic fashion. The Gospel is actually the overarching theme of Romans as Paul spells this out in his programmatic statement in 1:16–17. As the systematic presentation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, Romans is foundational to the biblical/Christian worldview.
Recognizing that Romans is not a systematic theology and does not contain all the essential truths that are relevant to a worldview per se, the apostle Paul articulates truths that are foundational to the biblical worldview. In Romans 1–8, Paul addresses certain components of a worldview that relate to the natural world, human identity, human relationships, and culture.
In a 750–1000-word essay, describe what Romans 1–8 teaches regarding (1)the natural world, (2)human identity,(3) human relationships, and (4) culture. Furthermore, (5)explain how this teaching of these topics affects your worldview. Make sure that you addr.
Biblical passaes 2 Samuel 13 1-22 looking for similarity between tw.docxlascellesjaimie
Biblical passaes 2 Samuel 13: 1-22 looking for similarity between two on Sexual Issuse or not then read Two commentaries write a reflections 2 page paper answering the following questions.
What caught your attention?
Why?
What is your reaction to the reading and commentary on it ?
Think?
Wonder?
NO COVER PAGE.... Thanks love
.
Benefits of Nongoverning Volunteer Orientation and TrainingBoard G.docxlascellesjaimie
Benefits of Nongoverning Volunteer Orientation and Training
Board Governance & Volunteer Management
APA Format 1-3 pages Friday by 10pm New York Time 2-3 References
Even when volunteers come to an organization with a name that is recognized, community connections, and years of professional expertise and experience, they still require an understanding of the background, purpose, and procedures of the specific organization to which they plan to dedicate their time. Volunteer orientation serves this purpose. Volunteer training goes further. Training introduces and teaches the specific skills and expertise needed to carry out the volunteers’ roles.
Post by Friday 10pm New York Time:
a brief description of your Final Project organization
www.saveoursons.webs.com
Then describe two benefits of nongoverning volunteer orientation, and two benefits of nongoverning volunteer training, specific to the organization you selected. Use examples that illustrate why orientation and training are essential to the volunteer program at your organization.
Web Sites
Penner, M. (2002).
Volunteer Placement, Orientation and Training
. Retrieved October 23, 2009, from
https://charityvillage.com/Content.aspx?topic=volunteer_placement_orientation_and_training&last=164
.
Bernard Madoff, a once highly regarded member of the Wall Street c.docxlascellesjaimie
Bernard Madoff, a once highly regarded member of the Wall Street community, recently pleaded guilty of running a $50 billion ponzi scheme. Research the driving forces behind his seemingly unethical behavior and discuss your findings. How did favoritism and bounded ethicality come into play in this case?
Tenbrunsel, A. (2011, January 17). Notre Dame Magazine. Retrieved March 5, 2015, from http://magazine.nd.edu/news/18097-ethics-now-when-the-worst-is-done-intended-or-not/
.
Benefits of a Diverse WorkforceCommunication is of utmost import.docxlascellesjaimie
Benefits of a Diverse Workforce
Communication is of utmost importance in diverse teams. How a manager approaches a situation can determine the future direction of teamwork and ultimately the level of success achieved. When communicating with diverse teams, whether verbally, via e-mail, or in writing, managers need to consider the potential reactions as well as the intention of the message.
and the discussion of possible HR actions. Based on the review, develop a FEW page memo to the project teams addressing the following:
Remind both managers and employees of the benefits of a culturally diverse workgroup.
Make recommendations on how to avoid scheduling issues due to the religious observance.
Explain how you arrived at your decision using relevant academic references.
Justify your suggestions by using empirical evidence and reference to any applicable laws.
Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
.
Below I attached the instructions and requirements for this paper..docxlascellesjaimie
Below I attached the instructions and requirements for this paper.
It would have to be written with the idea of working in a long term care facility during clinicals.
APA format and references, citations, and plagerism will be double checked.
All requirements are in the attachment below.
.
Below is 4 questions that I need answered. I usually just get other .docxlascellesjaimie
Below is 4 questions that I need answered. I usually just get other peoples responses and take bits and pieces of every one to create mine. If you could please do the same and make my discussion question answers touch every important detail that my fellow students have also touched on. Please make my disscussion answers original not following the same answering format as my fellow students. I dont want my teacher to know that All I do is take bits and pieces of others post to create my own
*Explain what motivation is and why managers need to be concerned about it.
*Explain what leadership is, when leaders are effective and ineffective, and the sources of power that enable managers to be effective leaders.
*Explain how different elements of group dynamics influence the functioning and effectiveness of groups and teams.
*Explain why strategic human resource management can help an organization gain a competitive advantage.
Below is all of these questions answered by different classmates in my class. Please use their answers as a base to formulate your own...
Motivation is the psychological forces that determine the direction of a person’s behavior in an organization, a person level of effort and a person level of persistence in the face of obstacles. Managers should be concerned with motivation because it explains why people behave the way they do. It can explain why a waiter is mean or nice, or why the customer service representative you are dealing with is helpful and understanding or rude and unhelpful.
Leadership is the process by which a person exerts influence over other people and inspires, motivates, and directs their activities, to help achieve group or organizational goal. Leaders are affective when they can unite a group to achieve a common goal. There are five types of power that a leader must balance. Legitimate power: the authority that a manager has by virtue of their position in an organizations hierarch. Reward power: the ability of a manager to give or withhold tangible and intangible rewards. Coercive power: the ability of a manager to punish others. Expert power: power that is based on the special knowledge, skills, and expertise that a leader possesses. Referent power: power that comes from subordinates’ and coworkers’ respect, admiration, and loyalty.
There are five key elements of group dynamics. Group size: the number of members in a group can be an important determinant of members’ motivation, commitment and group performance. Group roles: a set of behaviors and task that a member of a group is expected to perform because of his or her position in the group. Group leadership: leadership is a key ingredient for high- performing groups, teams, and organizations. Group development over time: it sometimes takes a self-managed team two or three years to perform up to it true capabilities. Group norms: shared guidelines or rules for behavior that most group member follow. Group cohesivenes.
Behavioral Interventions PresentationI need only 2 slides .docxlascellesjaimie
Behavioral Interventions Presentation
I need only 2 slides with speaker notes for the highlighted topic.
Create a 7- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with detailed speaker notes that compares how behavioral theories and interventions can be used in both a community and corrections setting. Use complete sentences, with correct grammar and punctuation, to fully explain each slide as if you were giving an in-person presentation.
Include the following in your presentation:
•At least two major theorists
•
At least two major theories
•Your rationale explaining why each intervention can be used in both a community and correctional setting
Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.
I need references.
.
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes .docx
1. Benchmark - Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on
Diabetes
1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content
30.0 %Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article
Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic
Tool.
Research or evidence-based article not identified.
Research or evidence-based article identified but does not
address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a
specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a
specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool.
Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a
specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a
comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be
fully addressed.
2. 50.0 %Summary of Article Includes the Following Content:
Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and
Significance to Nursing Practice.
Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated
in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an
understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate
critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject.
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the
assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the
basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered,
methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies
are discussed, but incomplete.
Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant.
Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles.
Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn
but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in
relevance, quality, and/or currentness.
Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are
clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified
whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and
illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and
relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment
criteria.
Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information
beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates
their validity through solid, academic research where
appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and
addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final
paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development
of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and
sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how
disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
3. 5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development
of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments
and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within
the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes
the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and
coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are
established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope.
Organization is disjointed.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of
ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of
organization is evident.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some
inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to
each other.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent.
Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic
sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and
transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph
and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure
is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or
4. sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly
distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
5.0 %Format
3.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence
construction, word choice, etc.)
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of
'primer prose' indicates writer either does not apply figures of
speech or uses them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most
part.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
2.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and
direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment)
5. No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually
correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The
documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage