Literary theory is the systematic study of the nature of literature and methods of analyzing literature. It has roots in ancient Greece and Rome but modern literary theory emerged in the 1950s under the influence of structural linguistics. There are many schools of literary theory that take different approaches, including New Criticism, formalism, structuralism, post-structuralism, Marxism, feminism, deconstruction, and reader-response theory. The key differences between theories relate to their priorities, methods, and how they define a text. Literary theory remains an important part of literary scholarship today.
One of the most influential literary critical movements of the 20th century. Speaking very generally, Russian Formalism as a critical movement was interested in identifying the specific quality of language use that separated the literary text from the non-literary text. Their approach was scientific inasmuch as they thought it was possible to establish what it is precisely that distinguishes ordinary usages of language from the poetic. Unlike the later post-structuralists, the Russian Formalists treated poetry as an autonomous form of discourse that was distinct from all other forms of discourse. They referred to this difference in qualitative terms as literaturnost (literariness) and sought to quantify (i.e. formalize) it by means of their theory of ostranenie (estrangement), which simply put is the process of making the already familiar seem unfamiliar or strange, thereby awakening in us a heightened state of perception.
I hope, it is quite helpful for the beginner to understand the concept of contemporary Literary theory. Students can take the help to study and understand the basics of contemporary literary theory. It includes concise concepts, tenets and components to make the strategic study for competitive examination at one specific study material.
Introduction: what is comparative literature Today ?JanviNakum
Abstract
There have been various definitions of comparative literature, which greatly varies from one scholar to another, but they all agree that it is one of the most modern literary sciences. Throughout the past two decades, new critical theories, such as gender-based criticism, translation studies, deconstruction and Orientalism, have changed approaches to literature and accordingly have had a profound impact on the work of the comparatists.
Sooner or later, anyone who claims to be working in comparative literature has to try and answer the inevitable question : What is it ? The simplest answer is that comparative literature involves the study of texts across cultures, that it is interdisciplinary and that it is concerned with patterns of connection in literature across both time and space.( Bassnett, p.1). "Everywhere there is connection, everywhere there is illustration," as Matthew Arnold puts it. According to Susan Bassnett, everybody who is interested in books is on the path to comparative literature.
Key Arguments
A comparative analysis you should have already read for different prominent writer for instance Chaucer, Shakespeare, Baudelaire, Poe, Joyce.
●Comparative Literature revolves around the study of literature outside the borders of one particular culture, the study of relations between literature on the one hand and other areas of human expression such as philosophy on the other hand. Critics have also related it to history as it examines the convergence (junction) of different literatures and its historical aspects of influence, considering that Comparative Literature is the essence of the history of literature, beyond the scope of one culture or language
●Another arguments is there west students of 1960 claimed that comparative literature could be put in single boundaries for comparative literature study, but she says that there is no particular method used for claiming.
●Critics at the end of the twentieth century, in the age of postmodernism, still wrestle with the same questions that were posed more than a century ago :
What is the object of the study in comparative literature?
How can comparison be the objective of anything?
If individual literatures have canon, what might a comparative canon be?
How can be comparatist select what to compare ?
Is comparative literature a discipline? Or is it simply a field of study ?
Introduction: What is comparative Literature Today ?
Susan Bassnett says that most of the people do not start with comparative literature but they end up with it in some way or other. Generally, we, first start reading the text and then we arrive at comparison. I mean to say, we start comparing that text with another that has similarities and dissimilarities. Comparative Literature emerged in 19th century. Comparative Literature is different from national literature, general literature and world literature. It was begun as “Literature Compare” in 1860 in Germany.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and TrainingAG2 Design
Explore how micro-credentials are transforming Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) with this comprehensive slide deck. Discover what micro-credentials are, their importance in TVET, the advantages they offer, and the insights from industry experts. Additionally, learn about the top software applications available for creating and managing micro-credentials. This presentation also includes valuable resources and a discussion on the future of these specialised certifications.
For more detailed information on delivering micro-credentials in TVET, visit this https://tvettrainer.com/delivering-micro-credentials-in-tvet/
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Descriptive Criticism
1. Literary theory
Discussion
Literary theory in a strict sense is the systematic study of the nature of literature and of
the methods for analyzing literature.[1] However, literary scholarship since the 19th
century often includes—in addition to, or even instead of literary theory in the strict sense
—considerations of intellectual history, moral philosophy, social prophecy, and other
interdisciplinary themes.[2] In the humanities, the latter style of scholarship is often called
simply quot;theory.quot; As a consequence, the word quot;theoryquot; has become an umbrella term for a
variety of scholarly approaches to reading texts. Mos of these approaches are informed by
t
various strands of Continental philosophy.
Contents
[hide]
1 Literary theory and literature
2 History
3 Differences among schools
4 Schools of literary theory
5 See also
6 Notes
7 References
8 External links
9 References
10 Further reading
Literary theory and literature
One of the fundamental questions of literary theory is quot;What is literature?quot;, though many
contemporary theorists and literary scholars believe either that quot;literaturequot; cannot be
defined or that it can refer to any use of language. Specific theories are distinguished not
only by their methods and conclusions, but even by how they define a quot;text.quot; For some
scholars of literature, quot;textsquot; comprises little more than quot;books belonging to the Western
literary canon.quot; But the principles and methods of literary theory have been applied to non-
fiction, popular fiction, film, historical documents, law, advertising, etc., in the related field
of cultural studies. In fact, some scholars within cultural studies treat cultural events, like
fashion or football riots, as quot;textsquot; to be interpreted. By this measure, literary theory can be
2. thought of as the general theory of interpretation.
Since theorists of literature often draw on a very heterogeneous tradition of Continental
philosophy and the philosophy of language, any classification of their approaches is only
an approximation. There are many quot;schoolsquot; or types of literary theory, which take
different approaches to understanding texts. Most theorists, even among those listed below,
combine methods from more than one of these approaches (for instance, the deconstructive
approach of Paul de Man drew on a long tradition of close reading pioneered by the New
Critics, and de Man was trained in the European hermeneutic tradition).
Broad schools of theory that have historically been important include the New Criticism,
formalism, Russian formalism, and structuralism, post-structuralism, Marxism, feminism
and French feminism, Christian, post-colonialism, new historicism, deconstruction, reader-
response criticism, and psychoanalytic criticism.
[edit] History
The practice of literary theory became a profession in the 20th century, but it has historical
roots that run as far back as ancient Greece (Aristotle's Poetics is an often cited early
example) and ancient Rome (Longinus' On the Sublime and Horace's Ars Poetica), and the
aesthetic theories of philosophers from ancient philosophy through the 18th and 19th
centuries are important influences on current literary study. The theory and criticism of
literature are, of course, also closely tied to the history of literature.
The modern sense of quot;literary theory,quot; however, dates only to approximately the 195 0s,
when the structuralist linguistics of Ferdinand de Saussure began strongly to influence
English language literary criticism. The New Critics and various European-influenced
formalists (particularly the Russian Formalists) had described some of their more abstract
efforts as quot;theoreticalquot; as well. But it was not until the broad impact of structuralism began
to be felt in the English-speaking academic world that quot;literary theoryquot; was thought of as a
unified domain.
In the academic world of the United Kingdom and the United States, literary theory was at
its most popular from the late 1960s (when its influence was beginning to spread outward
from elite universities like Johns Hopkins and Yale) through the 1980s (by which time it
was taught nearly everywhere in some form). During this span of time, literary theory was
perceived as academically cutting-edge research, and most university literature departments
sought to teach and study theory and incorporate it into their curricula. Because of its
meteoric rise in popularity and the difficult language of its key texts, theory was also often
criticized as faddish or trendy obscurantism (and many academic satire novels of the
period, such as those by David Lodge, feature theory prominently). Some scholars, both
theoretical and anti-theoretical, refer to the 1970s and 1980s debates on the academic
merits of theory as quot;the theory wars.quot;
By the early 1990s, the popularity of quot;theoryquot; as a subject of interest by itself was declining
slightly (along with job openings for pure quot;theoristsquot;) even as the texts of literary theory
were incorporated into the study of almost all literature. As of 2004, the controversy over
the use of theory in literary studies has all but died out, and discussions on the topic within
3. literary and cultural studies tend now to be consi erably milder and less acrimonious
d
(though the appearance of volumes such as Theory's Empire: An Anthology of Dissent,
edited by Daphne Patai with Will H. Corral, may signal a resurgence of the controversy).
Some scholars draw heavily on theory in their work, while others only mention it in
passing or not at all; but it is an acknowledged, important part ofthe study of literature.
[edit] Differences among schools
The intellectual traditions and priorities of the various kinds of literary theory are often
radically different. Even finding a set of common terms to compare them by can be
difficult.
For instance, the work of the New Critics often contained an implicit moral dimension, and
sometimes even a religious one: a New Critic might read a poem by T. S. Eliot or Gerard
Manley Hopkins for its degree of honesty in expressing the torment and contradiction of a
serious search for belief in the modern world. Meanwhile a Marxist critic might find such
judgments merely ideological rather than critical; the Marxist would say that the New
Critical reading did not keep enough critical distance from the poem's religious stance to be
able to understand it. Or a post-structuralist critic might simply avoid the issue by
understanding the religious meaning of a poem as an allegory of meaning, treating the
poem's references to quot;Godquot; by discussing their referential nature rather than what they refer
to.
Such a disagreement cannot be easily resolved, because it is inherent in the radically
different terms and goals (that is, the theories) ofthe critics. Their theories of reading
derive from vastly different intellectual traditions: the New Critic bases his work on an
East-Coast American scholarly and religious tradition, while the Marxist derives his
thought from a body of critical social and economic thought, and the post-structuralist's
work emerges from twentieth-century Continental philosophy of language. To expect such
different approaches to have much in common would be naïve; so calling them all quot;theories
of literaturequot; without acknowledging their heterogeneity is itself a reduction of their
differences.
In the late 1950s, Canadian literary critic Northrop Frye attempted to establish an approach
for reconciling historical criticism and New Criticism while addressing concerns of early
reader-response and numerous psychological and social approaches. His approach, laid out
in his Anatomy of Criticism, was explicitly structuralist, relying on the assumption of an
intertextual quot;order of wordsquot; and universality of certain structural types. His approach held
sway in English literature programs for several decades but lost favor during the
ascendence of post-structuralism.
For some theories of literature (especially certain kinds of formalism), the distinction
between 'literary' and other sorts of texts is of paramount importance. Other schools
(particularly post-structuralism in its various forms: new historicism, deconstruction, some
strains of Marxism and feminism) have sought to break down distinctions between the two
and have applied the tools of textual interpretation to a wide range of 'texts', including film,
non-fiction, historical writing, and even cultural events.
4. Bakhtin argued that the quot;utter inadequacyquot; of literary theory is evident when it is forced to
deal with the novel; other genres are intact already stabilized while the novel is still young
and developing.[3]
Another crucial distinction among the various theories of literary interpretation is
intentionality, the amount of weight given to the author's own op inions about and
intentions for a work. For most pre-20th century approaches, the author's intentions are a
guiding factor and an important determiner of the 'correct' interpretation of texts. The New
Criticism was the first school to disavow the role of the author in interpreting texts,
preferring to focus on quot;the text itselfquot; in a close reading. In fact, as much contention as
there is between formalism and later schools, they share the tenet that the author's
interpretation of a work is no more inherently meaningful than any other.
[edit] Schools of literary theory
Listed below are some of the most commonly identified schools of literary theory, along
with their major authors. In many cases, such as those of the historian and philosopher
Michel Foucault and the anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss, the authors were not
primarily literary critics, but their work has been broadly influential in literary theory.
American pragmatism and other American approaches
Harold Bloom, Stanley Fish, Richard Rorty
Cultural studies - emphasizes the role of literature in everyday life
Raymond Williams, Dick Hebdige, and Stuart Hall (British Cultural Studies);
Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno; Michel de Certeau; also Paul
Gilroy, John Guillory
Comparative Literature - confronts literatures from different languages, nations,
cultures and disciplines to each other
Darwinian literary studies - situates literature in the context of evolution and natural
selection
Deconstruction - a strategy of close reading that elicits the ways that key terms and
concepts may be paradoxical or self-undermining, rendering their meaning
undecidable
Jacques Derrida, Paul de Man, J. Hillis Miller, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe,
Gayatri Spivak, Avital Ronell
Gender (see feminist literary criticism) - which emphasizes themes of gender relations
Luce Irigaray, Hélène Cixous, Elaine Showalter
Formalism
5. German hermeneutics and philology
Friedrich Schleiermacher, Wilhelm Dilthey, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Erich
Auerbach
Marxism (see Marxist literary criticism) - which emphasizes themes of class conflict
Georg Lukács, Valentin Voloshinov, Raymond Williams, Terry Eagleton,
Fredric Jameson, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin,
New Criticism - which looked at literary works on the basis of what is written, and not
at the goals of the author or biographical issues
W.K. Wimsatt, F.R. Leavis, John Crowe Ransom, Cleanth Brooks, Robert
Penn Warren
New historicism - which examines a text by also examining other texts of the time
period
Stephen Greenblatt, Louis Montrose, Jonathan Goldberg, H. Aram Veeser
Postcolonialism - focuses on the influences of colonialism in literature, especially
regarding the historical conflict resulting from the exploitation of less developed
countries and indigenous peoples by western nations
Edward Said, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Homi Bhabha and Declan Kiberd
Post-modernism - criticism of the conditions present in the twentieth century, often
with concern for those viewed as social deviants or the Other
Michel Foucault, Roland Barthes, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari and Maurice
Blanchot
Post-structuralism - a catch-all term for various theoretical approaches (such as
deconstruction) that criticize or go beyond Structuralism's aspirations to create a
rational science of culture by extrapolating the model of linguistics to other
discursive and aesthetic formations
Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Julia Kristeva
Psychoanalysis (see psychoanalytic literary criticism) - Explores the role of the
subconscious in literature including that of the author, reader, and characters in the
text
Sigmund Freud, Jacques Lacan, Slavoj Žižek, Viktor Tausk
Queer theory - examines, questions, and criticizes the role of gender identity and
sexuality in literature
Judith Butler, Eve Sedgewick, Michel Foucault
6. Reader Response - focuses upon the active response ofthe reader to a text
Louise Rosenblatt, Wolfgang Iser, Norman Holland, Hans-Robert Jauss, Stuart
Hall
Russian Formalism
Victor Shklovsky, Vladimir Propp
Structuralism and semiotics (see semiotic literary criticism) - examine the underlying
structures in a text, the linguistic units in a text and how the author conveys
meaning through any structures
Ferdinand de Saussure, Roman Jakobson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roland
Barthes, Mikhail Bakhtin, Jurij Lotman, Antti Aarne, and morphology of
folklore
Eco-criticism - Explores cultural connections and human relationships to the natural
world.
Other theorists: Robert Graves, Alamgir Hashmi, John Sutherland, Northrop Frye,
Leslie Fiedler, Kenneth Burke, Paul Bénichou, Barbara Johnson
See also
List of literary terms
List of literary movements
Notes
^ Culler 1997, p.1
^ Culler 1997, p.1
^ Bakhtin 1981, p.8
[edit] References
Culler, J. (1997) Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford
university Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Michael Holquist.
Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Ho lquist. Austin and London: University of
Texas Press.
7. [edit] External links
Aristotle's Poetics (350 BCE)
Longinus' On the Sublime (1st century CE)
Sir Philip Sidney's Defence of Poesie (1595)
quot;A Bibliography of Literary Theory, Criticism and Philologyquot;, by José Ángel García
Landa
quot;Some Literary Criticism quotesquot;, by Tim Love
The Litcrit Toolkit
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: quot;Literary Theory,quot; by Vince Brewton
Annotated bibliography on literary theory
David Chandler, Semiotics for Beginners
References
Peter Barry. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory.
ISBN 0-7190-6268-3.
Jonathan Culler. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. ISBN 0-19-285383-X.
Terry Eagleton. Literary Theory: An Introduction. ISBN 0-8166-1251-X.
Terry Eagleton. After Theory. ISBN 0-465-01773-8.
Jean-Michel Rabaté. The Future of Theory. ISBN 0-631-23013-0.
The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism. ISBN 0-8018-4560-2.
Modern Criticism and Theory: A Reader. Ed. David Lodge and Nigel Wood. 2nd Ed.
ISBN 0-582-31287-6
Theory's Empire: An Anthology of Dissent. Ed. Daphne Patai and Will H. Corral.
ISBN 0-231-13417-7.
Further reading
Carroll, J. (2007). Evolutionary Approaches to Literature and Drama. In Robin
8. Dunbar and Louise Barrett, (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary
Psychology. Chapter 44. Full text
Castle, Gregory. Blackwell Guide to Literary Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing, 2007.
Culler, Jonathan. The Literary in Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.
Retrieved from quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_theoryquot;
sv